Would you voyage inside the Event Horizon of a Black Hole? For access to exclusive Member's only content, like Shep's answers to the "Thrilling Three" existential questions, *you need to join my mailing list* 👉 briankeating.com/mailing_list.php 📝
Definitely no. But I love Black Holes Profesor! Which I can't say about "Matrix" supposition "Stars exist only because Astronomers are looking at them"(WTF) Sorry Profesor Keating. Wonderfull Guest!
Amazing. Thanks so much! *What was your favorite takeaway from this conversation?* _Please join my mailing list to get _*_FREE_*_ notes & resources from this show! Click_ 👉 briankeating.com/mailing_list.php
Most people dont know that Einstein repeatedly said that singularities are not possible. Wherever you have an astronomical quantity of mass "dilation" (sometimes called gamma or y) will occur. Mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. There is no place in the universe where mass is more concentrated than at the center of a galaxy. 99.8% of the mass in our solar system is in the sun, 99.9% of the mass in an atom is in the nucleus. If these norms are true for galaxies than we can infer that there is 100's of trillions of solar masses at the center of galaxies. There is no way to know through observation, there is far too much interference, dilation and gravitational lensing. The mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated, in some sublime way that mass is all around us, there is no direction you can point your finger that you are not pointing to it. This is the explanation for the abnormally high rotation rates of stars in high mass galaxies (the reason for the theory of dark matter). There is no "mystery" mass, its dilated mass. Low mass galaxies (some galaxies can appear to be low mass but can have high mass at the center) have normal star rotation rates. This is what relativity would predict because there is an insufficient quantity of mass for relativistic velocities to be achieved. This is proof that Einstein was correct. General relativity does not predict singularities when you factor in dilation. Einstein repeatedly spoke about this, thats why nobody believed in black holes when he was alive. He wrote about this in the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics". Einstein formulated relativity before the existence of galaxies was known. Its clear the mass is dilated through the galaxy and not the universe as a whole. It exist everywhere and every when the galaxy has been. There is no pictures of black holes. All images and data from galactic centers are in line with relativity. Black holes and dark matter do not exist, its not a matter of opinion, its an elephant in the room.
Bravo on the changes you did to the M87* animation. It's actually more believable now than before it was modified. What I would like to know, is where are the images of Sgr A*? Or do we have to wait for the new ground based radio telescopes and the JWST to see the data on Sgr A*. ALMA all by it's lonesome is able to make precise measurements of the gas surrounding the supermassive black hole. According to data by ALMA Sgr A* is spewing massive amounts of energy, magnetic fields and even massive amounts of hot gas. The hot gas appears to be cooling, then condensing into stars. ALMA released a paper last year indicating stars are being birthed near the supermassive black hole. They admitted it was not expected because according to general relativity the conditions produced by their gravity would be too harsh for stars to form near them. But they measured outflows in the gas as if the solar winds from stars were forcing the gas away from the black hole's gravity. Yet they went over the infrared data and could not find any stars only hot gas and energy flowing away from the black hole. They could not detect any visible light. ALMA even released a Doppler image of the gas near the supermassive black hole. It showed all the gas to be moving away from the location they indicated as a giant plus sign in the middle of the gas. The white to red gas (redshift) indicated it was moving away from us. The light blue to blue colored gas (blueshift) indicated the gas moving towards us. The lighter the color of gas the faster the gas is moving, velocity. All the gas they could measure to be moving was moving in a beeline directly away from the black hole. The gas was not orbiting it extremely fast in an accretion disk. The data indicated the gas and energy was coming from the surface of the supermassive black hole, completely contrary to predictions made by general relativity, IE., nothing is suppose to escape the gravity of a black hole, not even light. Yet the data says otherwise. General relativity is clearly wrong. Why have physicists and astrophysicists said nothing about the data? Why has EHT not released the data on Sgr A*? Also, in the last few years the mass of the supermassive black hole Sgr A* has went from an estimated 2 million solar masses to a whopping 4 million solar masses. What gives? Did it double in mass over a few years? Or were your prior estimates not accurate? Is this now simply the estimated accepted value? If Sgr A* is 13.7 billion years old, then why is the quasar ULAS J1120+0641 2 billion solar masses but is estimated to be only 400 million years old some 13.2 billion light years away from us?
The structured precious gases is found pushing from white hole but the star that white hole comes from would be important we have stars or planets right get in one of those make white hole and gasses would need to be captured to study because one of those gas would be alternate source for understanding the black matter or darkened energies. [philosophically to discredit my self because anyone would do so I do not write book or ponder on anything I know does not breed results ] , gravity or anti gravity is only door to exit and enter holes. Not having the necessary explosion composition or powerful compound that Is going to be used for traveling the gas cataclysm which is unknown in its material markers. From specific stars 💫 that will be destroyed by man at some point when they creat device to pull planet or mine will cause the first white hole to be created by accident assumably to move into other another dimension in our real space changing physical form with out displacing the demensiin but still forming the needed star not needing time influence around it needing a time displacement algorithm to creat such a machine on top of density displacement manipulate machine all those to understand from the current Dimension to form manmade barycenter within selected current time galaxy with out the proper machines. Next the anti gravity field I’ve thought the black hole and white hole characteristics to a known variable or control for we will need to drive the energy of created white hole for gas as this will give us missing variables for Einstein algorithm of density just from master travel which will be so powerful. it is to think the math isn’t here because of scientist being A Holes about words and math not helping science I will not stop the momentum because it’s what caused us to fail but know the more energy cost is needed to get your missing variable we can draw from a manmade white hole will exert results because it would be our new power source. because of lack barycenter of manipulatively conceded dimension control in thee created no density space between the new form of matter discovers there in connections making your own theory with math you can you must know how to write these words your self so that variables can be discovered for your self ok. These white holes created from stars we would need it WILL need to be formed in specific locations start small distances and input those coordinates to see result create the black hole affix white hole LOCATION from perfect star specimen which I have not algorithmic theorized a solution to finding such star giants but must be white star or in its likeness but in words the process will be used to stabilize and slow the power exerted from such formations cleaning the ether in them for the power to be mined in reasonable density to not disrupt the needed dimension in TOW so(now) This is word vomit and it won’t get read until too late but this is what I found out through Tesla and Einstein and what’s missing but compliments to them for the drawings that was used to board my schematics of what it would look like I’ve died three times was these here in words not mathematically yet I’m sure if I had calm minds for a lifetime like in Egypt we could erect fine works of displayed power for science 🧪 but transportation portals is what’s really being discussed not just simple dark matter. Needing two planets of same compositions will help get better result for sure
John Thanks so much! *What was your favorite takeaway from this conversation?* _Please join my mailing list to get _*_FREE_*_ notes & resources from this show! Click_ 👉 briankeating.com/mailing_list.php
A great and inspirational conversation, although I would appreciate if some of the questions were more compact because there were points where the questions were so long that I forgot what the question was.
Maybe this is Shep Doeleman's typical aspect, but he always strikes me as a chap, who is perennially sleep deprived. Always interested in what he has to say.
Bill Thanks so much! *What was your favorite takeaway from this conversation?* _Please join my mailing list to get _*_FREE_*_ notes & resources from this show! Click_ 👉 briankeating.com/mailing_list.php
@@DrBrianKeating can listen to Leonard Susskind, can do the math, but the fun is guys really doing the work. Connecting all the dots in the puzzle, double checking triple checking quadruple checking to know you're not fooling yourself. Man, I love this kind of stuff thanks Brian, thanks
Just before 55 minutes he refers to black holes as “fractal”. Does this imply he subscribes to some sort of fractal dimension theory or am I reading too much into the comment? Great video!
If time slows to essentially zero at the event horizon, then how can the in-falling mass continue to the center/singularity? Wouldn't it be "frozen in time" once inside, incapable of further movement? If that's the case, black holes should be "solid" comprised of matter frozen in time at the moment of crossing the event horizon.
Form the outside it appears frozen. But General Relativity describes the Universe that has no preferred reference frame. From the point of view of in falling matter, it’s the outside Universe that appears differently.
@@kadourimdou43 Of course, but from the mass' perspective the outside universe would accelerate in time infinitely fast. In all practicality, the matter inside the even horizon, time has essentially stopped -- the mass is effectively frozen. For it to migrate to the "center" it would take the remaining age of the universe.
Time doesn’t stop at the event horizon of a black hole. It only stops relative to us. For an observer at the event horizon time will tick normally. Hope this helps.
Michael Thanks so much! *What was your favorite takeaway from this conversation?* _Please join my mailing list to get _*_FREE_*_ notes & resources from this show! Click_ 👉 briankeating.com/mailing_list.php
The other side of event horizon is the other side of the manifold, the antimatter universe. Neuron decay cosmology is Inevitable. It is the geometric topological and thermodynamic solution to cosmology and it is essentially a material physical process. QM can be replaced with a classical superfluid model
I’d like to know HOW we’ve developed the image of what we think a black hole looks like. . . the mechanism of light being bent by the black hole so that we are able to imagine what is behind the black hole.
Do i really need to wait ten years and then drag up my UA-cam posts as all the big bang promoters (i use that word since other models are so intentionally avoided) attempt to reposition themselves pleading that "we had no good evidence or theories contradicting big bang! How could we have known?" Sheesh. You don't explore by staying inside your conceptual yard.
#BrianKeating ... why are you adapting for-Profit subscription-model SAM HARRIS model... instead of the for-KNOWLEDGE model of Andrew Huberman, Lex Friedman and the master himself #JoeRogan
If SPIRAL 'Black Hole Illusion Resolution' hypothesis, there is no ongoing hyper-density at galactic centers. We do see most of the universe from the light that departed stellar objects when they were denser. Over radius 'I' the more distant, the denser. reference 'Pearlman SPIRAL' cosmological redshift hypothesis and model.
The universe having attained mature size and density within 4/'I'(365) a fraction of history. The entire universe approximates the visible universe w/ a radius of about 2B LY. 'I' = the LY distance to the nearest stellar object whose light arrives here and now and has ever been subjugated to any cosmic expansion. While some think I is up to 5M +/-. others 15k +/- , in Pearlman YeC we predict it will pan out at 5,782 to date. Taking 'Pearlman' vs Hubble, SPIRAL 'BLITZ' on the cosmic distance ladder, and SPIRAL 'cosmic blue-shift offset, regarding cosmic expansion.
Would you voyage inside the Event Horizon of a Black Hole?
For access to exclusive Member's only content, like Shep's answers to the "Thrilling Three" existential questions, *you need to join my mailing list* 👉 briankeating.com/mailing_list.php 📝
Definitely no. But I love Black Holes Profesor!
Which I can't say about "Matrix" supposition "Stars exist only because Astronomers are looking at them"(WTF)
Sorry Profesor Keating.
Wonderfull Guest!
This was a good conversation , great to see some more details being discussed. Rather than the typical talk you see in the regular media....
Thanks very much. That was my goal here
“we made a parabolic telescope the size of the earth”. Yup . That got me. Something even I can understand
Thanks
I love these videos and this one was fantastic.
Amazing. Thanks so much! *What was your favorite takeaway from this conversation?* _Please join my mailing list to get _*_FREE_*_ notes & resources from this show! Click_ 👉 briankeating.com/mailing_list.php
@@DrBrianKeating will do!
Most people dont know that Einstein repeatedly said that singularities are not possible. Wherever you have an astronomical quantity of mass "dilation" (sometimes called gamma or y) will occur. Mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. There is no place in the universe where mass is more concentrated than at the center of a galaxy. 99.8% of the mass in our solar system is in the sun, 99.9% of the mass in an atom is in the nucleus. If these norms are true for galaxies than we can infer that there is 100's of trillions of solar masses at the center of galaxies. There is no way to know through observation, there is far too much interference, dilation and gravitational lensing.
The mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated, in some sublime way that mass is all around us, there is no direction you can point your finger that you are not pointing to it. This is the explanation for the abnormally high rotation rates of stars in high mass galaxies (the reason for the theory of dark matter). There is no "mystery" mass, its dilated mass. Low mass galaxies (some galaxies can appear to be low mass but can have high mass at the center) have normal star rotation rates. This is what relativity would predict because there is an insufficient quantity of mass for relativistic velocities to be achieved. This is proof that Einstein was correct.
General relativity does not predict singularities when you factor in dilation. Einstein repeatedly spoke about this, thats why nobody believed in black holes when he was alive. He wrote about this in the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics".
Einstein formulated relativity before the existence of galaxies was known. Its clear the mass is dilated through the galaxy and not the universe as a whole. It exist everywhere and every when the galaxy has been.
There is no pictures of black holes. All images and data from galactic centers are in line with relativity. Black holes and dark matter do not exist, its not a matter of opinion, its an elephant in the room.
What’s inside a Blackhole?
My Bank account.
Lol 😂
Bravo on the changes you did to the M87* animation. It's actually more believable now than before it was modified.
What I would like to know, is where are the images of Sgr A*? Or do we have to wait for the new ground based radio telescopes and the JWST to see the data on Sgr A*. ALMA all by it's lonesome is able to make precise measurements of the gas surrounding the supermassive black hole. According to data by ALMA Sgr A* is spewing massive amounts of energy, magnetic fields and even massive amounts of hot gas. The hot gas appears to be cooling, then condensing into stars. ALMA released a paper last year indicating stars are being birthed near the supermassive black hole. They admitted it was not expected because according to general relativity the conditions produced by their gravity would be too harsh for stars to form near them. But they measured outflows in the gas as if the solar winds from stars were forcing the gas away from the black hole's gravity. Yet they went over the infrared data and could not find any stars only hot gas and energy flowing away from the black hole. They could not detect any visible light. ALMA even released a Doppler image of the gas near the supermassive black hole. It showed all the gas to be moving away from the location they indicated as a giant plus sign in the middle of the gas. The white to red gas (redshift) indicated it was moving away from us. The light blue to blue colored gas (blueshift) indicated the gas moving towards us. The lighter the color of gas the faster the gas is moving, velocity. All the gas they could measure to be moving was moving in a beeline directly away from the black hole. The gas was not orbiting it extremely fast in an accretion disk. The data indicated the gas and energy was coming from the surface of the supermassive black hole, completely contrary to predictions made by general relativity, IE., nothing is suppose to escape the gravity of a black hole, not even light. Yet the data says otherwise. General relativity is clearly wrong. Why have physicists and astrophysicists said nothing about the data? Why has EHT not released the data on Sgr A*?
Also, in the last few years the mass of the supermassive black hole Sgr A* has went from an estimated 2 million solar masses to a whopping 4 million solar masses. What gives? Did it double in mass over a few years? Or were your prior estimates not accurate? Is this now simply the estimated accepted value?
If Sgr A* is 13.7 billion years old, then why is the quasar ULAS J1120+0641 2 billion solar masses but is estimated to be only 400 million years old some 13.2 billion light years away from us?
The structured precious gases is found pushing from white hole but the star that white hole comes from would be important we have stars or planets right get in one of those make white hole and gasses would need to be captured to study because one of those gas would be alternate source for understanding the black matter or darkened energies.
[philosophically to discredit my self because anyone would do so I do not write book or ponder on anything I know does not breed results ] , gravity or anti gravity is only door to exit and enter holes. Not having the necessary explosion composition or powerful compound that Is going to be used for traveling the gas cataclysm which is unknown in its material markers. From specific stars 💫 that will be destroyed by man at some point when they creat device to pull planet or mine will cause the first white hole to be created by accident assumably to move into other another dimension in our real space changing physical form with out displacing the demensiin but still forming the needed star not needing time influence around it needing a time displacement algorithm to creat such a machine on top of density displacement manipulate machine all those to understand from the current Dimension to form manmade barycenter within selected current time galaxy with out the proper machines. Next the anti gravity field I’ve thought the black hole and white hole characteristics to a known variable or control for we will need to drive the energy of created white hole for gas as this will give us missing variables for Einstein algorithm of density just from master travel which will be so powerful. it is to think the math isn’t here because of scientist being A Holes about words and math not helping science I will not stop the momentum because it’s what caused us to fail but know the more energy cost is needed to get your missing variable we can draw from a manmade white hole will exert results because it would be our new power source. because of lack barycenter of manipulatively conceded dimension control in thee created no density space between the new form of matter discovers there in connections making your own theory with math you can you must know how to write these words your self so that variables can be discovered for your self ok. These white holes created from stars we would need it WILL need to be formed in specific locations start small distances and input those coordinates to see result create the black hole affix white hole LOCATION from perfect star specimen which I have not algorithmic theorized a solution to finding such star giants but must be white star or in its likeness but in words the process will be used to stabilize and slow the power exerted from such formations cleaning the ether in them for the power to be mined in reasonable density to not disrupt the needed dimension in TOW so(now)
This is word vomit and it won’t get read until too late but this is what I found out through Tesla and Einstein and what’s missing but compliments to them for the drawings that was used to board my schematics of what it would look like I’ve died three times was these here in words not mathematically yet I’m sure if I had calm minds for a lifetime like in Egypt we could erect fine works of displayed power for science 🧪 but transportation portals is what’s really being discussed not just simple dark matter. Needing two planets of same compositions will help get better result for sure
Love Shep. His passion and accomplishments are extraordinary....
Thank you for the video.
John Thanks so much! *What was your favorite takeaway from this conversation?* _Please join my mailing list to get _*_FREE_*_ notes & resources from this show! Click_ 👉 briankeating.com/mailing_list.php
Just incredible, yes i take the trip, but only at 90 years old.....
A great and inspirational conversation, although I would appreciate if some of the questions were more compact because there were points where the questions were so long that I forgot what the question was.
Maybe this is Shep Doeleman's typical aspect, but he always strikes me as a chap, who is perennially sleep deprived. Always interested in what he has to say.
Great interview. What Fun!!! Thanks :)
Bill Thanks so much! *What was your favorite takeaway from this conversation?* _Please join my mailing list to get _*_FREE_*_ notes & resources from this show! Click_ 👉 briankeating.com/mailing_list.php
@@DrBrianKeating can listen to Leonard Susskind, can do the math, but the fun is guys really doing the work. Connecting all the dots in the puzzle, double checking triple checking quadruple checking to know you're not fooling yourself. Man, I love this kind of stuff thanks Brian, thanks
What is the only thing that cannot sink into the black hole?
Answer this question correctly and you are streets ahead of the rest!
Just before 55 minutes he refers to black holes as “fractal”. Does this imply he subscribes to some sort of fractal dimension theory or am I reading too much into the comment? Great video!
Heino's surname is Falcke, not Flacke.
If time slows to essentially zero at the event horizon, then how can the in-falling mass continue to the center/singularity? Wouldn't it be "frozen in time" once inside, incapable of further movement? If that's the case, black holes should be "solid" comprised of matter frozen in time at the moment of crossing the event horizon.
Form the outside it appears frozen. But General Relativity describes the Universe that has no preferred reference frame. From the point of view of in falling matter, it’s the outside Universe that appears differently.
@@kadourimdou43 Of course, but from the mass' perspective the outside universe would accelerate in time infinitely fast. In all practicality, the matter inside the even horizon, time has essentially stopped -- the mass is effectively frozen. For it to migrate to the "center" it would take the remaining age of the universe.
@@lohphat From inside the outside Universe appears as a single point, and time appears to be going faster. As far as I know.
Bottom Line: Brain hurts
Time doesn’t stop at the event horizon of a black hole. It only stops relative to us. For an observer at the event horizon time will tick normally. Hope this helps.
Einstein didn't like fiction, like Keating. Physics is lost in magic.
Good video
Michael Thanks so much! *What was your favorite takeaway from this conversation?* _Please join my mailing list to get _*_FREE_*_ notes & resources from this show! Click_ 👉 briankeating.com/mailing_list.php
The other side of event horizon is the other side of the manifold, the antimatter universe.
Neuron decay cosmology is Inevitable. It is the geometric topological and thermodynamic solution to cosmology and it is essentially a material physical process.
QM can be replaced with a classical superfluid model
I’d like to know HOW we’ve developed the image of what we think a black hole looks like. . . the mechanism of light being bent by the black hole so that we are able to imagine what is behind the black hole.
Ok ok... am I the ONLY ONE who sees Soyjak pointing at a blackhole??? O_O
*just a joke, not a commentary on Dr.Keating or the video at all!
Oh Come on why did you change the thumb nail?! = )
“Therefore do not deceive yourself. Of all deceivers, fear most yourself.” - Soren Kierkegaard … suspect that Feynman got it from there.
“ best and brightest in the multiverse” haha!
It’s true!
@@DrBrianKeating oh I know:)
Thanks Doug
People refuse to count their own fingers, FFS.
GABH Galazy Anchoring Black Holes have counterparts. QFFF
#PhilosophyOfTimeTravel #infons #januspoint #SUSY #3767
👌👌👌👌👍👍👍👍
Do i really need to wait ten years and then drag up my UA-cam posts as all the big bang promoters (i use that word since other models are so intentionally avoided) attempt to reposition themselves pleading that "we had no good evidence or theories contradicting big bang! How could we have known?"
Sheesh. You don't explore by staying inside your conceptual yard.
#BrianKeating ... why are you adapting for-Profit subscription-model SAM HARRIS model... instead of the for-KNOWLEDGE model of Andrew Huberman, Lex Friedman and the master himself #JoeRogan
🤧
If SPIRAL 'Black Hole Illusion Resolution' hypothesis, there is no ongoing hyper-density at galactic centers.
We do see most of the universe from the light that departed stellar objects when they were denser. Over radius 'I' the more distant, the denser.
reference 'Pearlman SPIRAL' cosmological redshift hypothesis and model.
The universe having attained mature size and density within 4/'I'(365) a fraction of history. The entire universe approximates the visible universe w/ a radius of about 2B LY. 'I' = the LY distance to the nearest stellar object whose light arrives here and now and has ever been subjugated to any cosmic expansion.
While some think I is up to 5M +/-. others 15k +/- , in Pearlman YeC we predict it will pan out at 5,782 to date. Taking 'Pearlman' vs Hubble, SPIRAL 'BLITZ' on the cosmic distance ladder, and SPIRAL 'cosmic blue-shift offset, regarding cosmic expansion.