It's good that you remind people about the differences in earning power between economies like the U.S. and Europe versus the rest of the world. In this age of global communications, we need to remember that not everyone lives where we do or to the same standards.
UK and US have resilient economies yes, but quality of life does not correlate much with this. These are particularly stressful areas to live and work in - more people can afford a £2k camera here, but we're getting fat, autistic, stressed, and detached from nature in the process. Could be a long debate. Eitherway, that E-M5iii is looking superb.
In any economy, the bottom line for a professional photographer should be whether this new camera would increase my income? Sometimes, new convenience features would do it. Internal ND filters could be big deal for landscape photographers and videographers. This camera might do it for wildlife and sports photographers.
This is exactly what I like about Robin’s channel. It represents much better the needs of real people, but he gives us the quality of professional grade photographers. Photography involves knowing and working with the limitations of the equipment and environment. Robin’s experience working with the Olympus system finding workarounds in low light, street portraits, wild life, gives me goals to strive for.
I disagree with you. Robin has a limited range of subjects in his business. I fully understand his comments for his type of photography but it certainly doesn't match the wide range of subjects that a lot of us photograph.
@@brianlaunchbury4491 I understand that not all photographers have the same needs a Robin. That statement applies to all photographers, really. But what I like about Robin’s channel is that he is not selling you new gear. His creative ways of using m43 gear for his photography is refreshing. For example, he explains that he uses the m.zuiko 75 f1.8 as a substitute for a 70-200 f2.8 full frame, for his paid work. Not everyone can do this, but for a casual photographer wanting to enjoy a social event without lugging huge gear and wanting great results, mimicking Robin is actually a good strategy. Yes, there are other alternatives, but I like Robin’s.
@@robinwong I just subbed. I also just saw the video where you quit as a Visionary. A shame and seems very shortsighted by the new company. Still, you are completely free to speak now! I always had a soft spot for Olympus cameras since 1981 or so.
Robin, I can't recall ever seeing a better case statement. You're correct -- ''The right tool for the job' should guide us all when staring down new gear hype. Please accept my compliments for your passionate and spontaneous presentation. Yours is credible because it obviously came directly from the mind and the heart. You broke the UA-cam host mode of relying on notes, with the constant looking down. You spoke directly from start to conclusion. I too will be staying with my 5-MK III and 1-MK III.
I saw some comments, specially the guy saying that Robin haven’t seen his “great” work (he didn’t use the word great but it was like he was conveying that). Robin explained in a very clear English language that it was not necessary for his work to have more expensive equipment but if you need it you go for it. Also he explained the principles of economy that apply to his very specific case in the country in which he lived. He is a humble person that doesn’t go around bragging about his achievements or gear, just being contented with what he can do within his means. Kudos to Robin for sharing and teaching us. Some people never learns.
Very well reasoned, Robin. I'm sure many purchasers of the OM-1 are buying it just because they can, and want "the latest" even if they have no real need for it. It's all part of today's consumer-oriented world where buying things is some people's major means of satisfaction in life.
Robin, you are a true professional and a great mentor. You make sensible decisions for the practical benefit of your business, and put them in context when sharing so that it does not come across as preaching to others to follow. You deserve a huge audience because you share generous amounts of knowledge and wisdom, in between showcasing your talent. And you do it with approachable style. Watching your videos is always a treat for me.
Robin, you make good points. I tend to purchase cameras in the middle of their life cycle so I am not paying a premium price. I am also a hobbyist so I can wait it out. I also feel at current camera price points more systems need to be explored going forward. As you said the right tool for the right job. Overall my E-M1 Mk II is still plenty of camera for me at the moment.
@@ridealongwithrandy I'm careful with that combination of words. But I feel the same way about the camera. I bought a new E-M1 Mk II with 45mm/f1.2 PRO for 800 Euros a year ago on sale. Gotta love that.
@@robinwong "Yeah the pricing though! Seriously, not justified" It might depend on your current system. Like the commenter, I'm an advanced hobbyist and I tend to buy cameras in the middle of their life cycle. I currently have an E-M5 Mk II, and 90% of the time I use it with the 12-40mm f2.8 PRO lens. I was getting very close to upgrading to an E-M1 Mk III, which is now in the middle of its life cycle, but decided to wait and see what the new OM-1 was like. At this point, either the E-M1 III or the OM-1 are worthwhile upgrades from the E-M5 II, but now that I've waited this long, I feel like the extra US $500 for the OM-1 is probably worthwhile. Having said that, I fully agree that the OM-1 is probably not a reasonable upgrade from an E-M1 Mk III, unless there's a very specific use case that benefits a lot from one of the improvements.
Robin, I can’t thank you enough for your honesty and the countless hours creating these videos to educate us toward a more informed decision. You speak articulately and passionately. I have an OM-D EM-5 (which made me fall in love with its image quality and color rendering). But your review on the EM-1 mark ll convinced me upgrading to it would be a more powerful and enjoyable camera to use. A mint condition EM1-mk ll found on eBay and very happy. I love that your reviews consider economics before selecting an upgrade. I trust YOUR reviews, as highly paid photographers in US have a different perspective (out of touch with most budgets). You have earned my respect for your selfless and thorough, common sense reviews. Your customers are very lucky to have you. Thank you again.
I’m with you Robin, I have 2 EM1Xs, an EM5mkiii for UA-cam videos and I don’t see a good enough reason to upgrade. U n like you who runs a business, I on the other hand run a business called retirement, and upgrading is not worth the expenditure nor can I afford it. I have more than enough cameras and I don’t even use more than 50% of the camera abilities. On a side note, I will not give up my sensors on the EM1Xs. I go out in the desert and enjoy knowing my altitude, air pressure, compass directions, and GPS locations. I also shoot Nikon D500, and the D750. If one goes to the Photons to Photos website, the dynamic range of the OM-1(new) vs the EM1 Mkii shows that the EM1mkii has much better dynamic range. How can that be, according to the charts, the EM1 mkii has the best dynamic range, best low light ISO, and the best low light EV of ALL the OM-Ds and the new OM-1(new). I say OM-1(new) because I have the original OM-2n, and the OM2SP. Heehee Cheers!
I actually have three Olympus OM-1. They are all around 45 years old, though. The camera body is in fact the least important (to a degree) factor to become successful as a photographer. For digital photography I only have one camera, an Olympus Pen-F, and I don't have any wish to switch it for some other. It can do anything I want (and much more) and delivers the data quality I need.
I got the OM-1 for my wildlife photography and I can say that I am shooting hummingbird images at ISO 12,800 where before I wouldn't dare shoot over ISO 6400. I am getting very good images at high ISO now where before I didn't. I am loving the images I am getting from this camera. It may not be for everyone but I can say that for me its a game changer for my photography so far.
This is exactly what the OM-1 is designed for. By the way, I was surprised at how high ISO has to be used in the tropics. There is very little light in the jungle.
My experience is the same, for photographing birds I get many times more keepers with the OM-1 than with the E-M1 Mk II. Bird recognition and focus tracking are day and night from my previous camera. The faster refresh rate of the EVF makes following birds in flight a lot easier. With noise I dare to say that the noise even if present is more uniform and seems to be predominantly luminamce nose. I have also been happily using higher ISO than in the past. This does not contradict Robin's decision. The tool used needs to match the task and replacing it needs to bring enough benefit to justify the cost.
@@PedroAphalo The position of a hobby photographer is different than that of a professional one. I earn my living in a different way and I photograph for fun. Amateurs justify their equipment purchases because they just like it and want it. If they can afford it, of course. A professional has to take into account the contribution of the new technique to his business. Just as Robin did. I'm willing to travel far and spend some of that money for my photography trips, the business trip has to pay for itself economically. As far as I know photographers with the new OM-1, they are mostly just enthusiasts.
@@konradkopecny5056 I agree. I wrote that the new camera brings improvements for bird photography, and that despite this, Robin's decision makes a lot of sense. There are some professional photographers using the O-M1, at least in Finland. Mostly for nature photography. The point Robin makes about earning power vs. pricing in different countries being a major constraint for many when buying cameras is very true.
That is very exciting to hear. I just ordered one from bird photography in the January sales. I can't wait to try it out in low light conditions, which we see a lot in dingy old England! It is going to be a huge upgrade from my Nikon D7200!
It's really a pity OMD ceased to employ Robin as an Ambassador. He is way better and much more interesting with his reviews than most of the existing ones .... But I will nevertheless update to the new camera OM-1 ...
@@robinwong We understand Robin but just accept that we love you man. :) Other than a former visionary I know and am friends with. You were my favorite, Jimmy too. You two were always so active and always there to reply to questions and there for Olympus users.
Hello Robin. With this pandemic, it has impacted and still impacts many of us. For momentary and budgetary reasons, it is important to make judicious choices. Your UA-cam channel on Olympus cameras really helped me a lot because there are so many configurations that are hidden in the menus. For my part, OM-1 is what I've been waiting for from Olympus/OM Digital for a long time for several reasons, ergonomics, button and dials, video capabilities (no more small file video segmentation), photo noise control , 2 memory card slots as fast as each other, the tracking for flying birds is fantastic, the menu finally easier to use (major point for myself). By selling my old EM-1 mark II to acquire OM-1, the difference in acquisition cost remains reasonable and makes a lot of sense. I must confess that I was hoping that you would acquire the OM-1 camera and that you would demonstrate the (impressive to me) advantages of the new camera. For my part, you are the source of reference, the best teacher and popularizer to use the functions of Olympus cameras to their full potential. I hope one day to see you again with an OM-1 camera (when it makes sense to you for its features and economically) explaining the new OM-1 menus, new features and demonstrating the benefits of this little gem of camera because you are one of the best teachers in the field! I sincerely hope that your UA-cam channel will continue to grow (as a further aid to your income).
I just upgraded to OM-1 from EM1M3. I see significant improvement in image quality and AF performance is too a new high level. I do understand your viewpoint, Robin, but it should not discourage people from trying it out. Guys, do try it out before you say I won't buy.
Wow talk about getting animated over all the different makes of cameras and types of cameras in general you put your point across very well indeed. You have the current cameras that you need for your professional photographer work. Thank you for being so succinct and honest Mr Wong.
I switched from EM1 mk2 to Sony A7III and love the sony much more. I can take good pics with the EM1 but it's just more limited. Eye AF is amazing and the better dynamic range helps a ton when you mess up.
Robin, Due to your background and experience with the Olympus system and products, we all want to know your opinion on the OM1. That doesn’t mean that you have to purchase one OM1 to test it and review it. Somehow, get a loaner camera and let us know, what you think, if possible.
I imagine, from a fellow photographer in your area. Through your contacts in the industry. Perhaps a rental from a camera rental service in your area if that service exist. I would gladly lend you mine, but I am still waiting for it, with no date in sight. It can’t be that difficult, Robin Wong is famous!
I agree that for many, the pursuit of gear has overtaken developing skills. I was a very early adopter of the classic Canon 5D. I used that camera for over 10 years before I bought my first M43 camera, and Olympus EP3. After eight years, mirrorless technology advanced sufficiently for me to take the next step, and I bought an EM1.2. That camera, my EP3 and the older Canons still take great photos, but because I do wildlife and motorsports photography as a hobby, the next step up to an OM-1 makes sense. However, it will likely be my last camera as I am nearing retirement.
This has happened with my other interest in electronic music in the past 15 years, especially withanalogue synthesizers. There is a lot of snobbery in that area. So many videos and posts are all about what gear people have that others don't have - rather than having any music on them!
I tell you that is one of your best, informative and eye opening video recently. BTW, you are the honestly youtuber who didn't change during covid-19 pandemic time. you stay with both leg on the ground and not going with hype.
Robin...I started watching your videos a few years ago. I started with a ep1..then em10...then Em1Mk2. I use my cameras in my work as a newspaper reporter, and also as a hobby. I appreciate your honesty and passion for the craft, and the many things I have learned from your videos. Thanks so much for all you do!
You correctly concluded that in your case that the cost benefit isn't there for you and would have come to the same conclusion, nice vlog. For me replacing my aging EM10Mk1, I debated between getting the EM1Mk3, now reduced in price, or OM1 and considered moving to FF Nikon Z6ii similarly priced body. My choice of getting the OM1 was driven by the following: wanting to keep the camera-lens combo size down for travel and extra cost of system switch for similar lens capability (about $1500 more) eliminated the FF option, this being a long term commitment (8-10yrs) in a new camera I was hesitant to start off with an already 3yrs old model, and hope to appreciate having the better EVF and processing speed of the OM1 for computational features as a bonus not forgetting firmware updates. Video does not matter for me, IQ was not a consideration.
The right tool for the right job is what's important. I love bird photography and the 2x reach advantage plus the smaller lenses seem ideal with OM-1. The recent improvements in AF and the fact that it's much faster being a stacked sensor makes the OM-1 a fantastic upgrade for me from Canon 7Dmk2 if I can get hold of one and get rid of some older Canon stuff. In the UK we are not rolling in money either and the price of Canon and Sony is ridiculous for us too. The US prices seem better. If I was doing photography professionally weddings and events etc I would rather use full frame or even Fuji GFX100s. I would buy grey market from HK as I said UK prices are ridiculous.
You may want to wait a couple weeks to see what Canon comes out with at the end of this month. There are strong rumors that they're about to announce an R7, the first APS-C camera in the new mirrorless R-series. That would allow you to keep shooting with any lenses you already have for use with your 7D Mark II. You'll need an adapter to do that, but many report there's no loss of performance adapting EF/EF-S lenses for use on the R-system. Some users even say they feel the lenses work even better adapted, than they did on their DSLRs. One caveat... Apparently some 3rd party lenses don't adapt well, if you have any of those. But any problems seem to be older 3rd lenses, not those currently in production. Of course, there wouldn't be as much reduction in size and weight as with the OM-1... Since you'd be using the same lenses on the same sensor format with an R7. There may be some minor size and weight reduction in the camera body itself, somewhat offset by needing to use am adapter. But if you eventually migrate to the RF lenses there will be additional size/weight savings. For example, both the RF 70-200s are considerably smaller and lighter than their EF counterparts. The RF 100-500mm not only has 100mm more reach than the EF 100-400mm II, but it also weighs about a half lb. less. I'm not knocking the new OM-1... In fact if it lives up to the claims, it sounds like a very nice camera and I've recommended it to some sports and wildlife shooters for consideration. But it's different when you are looking at changing systems, since you'll need a whole new kit of camera and lenses, while taking significant loss selling your used gear. It's usually easier and much less expensive to upgrade within your current system, if possible. P.S. Keep in mind that your UK prices include VAT. Here in the US sales taxes are added to the prices you see listed. That varies by state and even city... But, for example, where I live the sales tax in almost 10%, on top of that list price. Even if I buy from a seller in another state, they have to collect the sales tax and send it to my local tax collector.
@@alanm.4298 Thanks for the reply and yes I never rush to buy will wait as you say see what Canon does but I don't see them doing a stacked crop sensor it's quite usual for Canon to create new models from old sensors for years to come. The 90d/M6mk2 sensor it seems is what the rumors suggest they will use. That is not a match for the OM-1 stacked sensor it will be a disappointment. Fuji are also coming out with a stacked sensor soon. You really need to see the prices of the RF lenses in our UK camera stores. One Canon lens price equals equivalent Olympus lens plus new Camera plus another lens. Have a look at the prices in the link. www.srsmicrosystems.co.uk/lenses/canon-rf
You will downgrade if you go from 7Dmk2 to OM-1. Don’t be fooled by the m4/3 fanatics. Get yourself a r7 if the r5/r6 is to expensive. It gives you a much bigger sensor and much better autofocus and it’s cheaper.
And the OM sensor is inferior to other stacked sensors with its slow read speeds. Believe me, the noise in m4/3 is crazy, and this new sensor is just slightly better then the old.
My mother in law is a pro photographer, she still runs a fuji xt3 and old Nikon d80 for certain situations. When i ask her why she hasn't upgraded her reply was interesting. (Paraphrasing) "Id like to have a brand new camera, but these fit my needs just fine, i know they're bulletproof, and i know how the results will turn out. I upgraded to mirrorless purely because holding a DSLR all day got exhausting. Super high resolution images just take up way too much space for limited benefit." It's an interesting perspective to have.
First, you have a great review of the Olympus E-1, and, made it fun to step back and just enjoy the craft! Now, this honest and clear information about what it takes to be a professional photographer, the investments in equipment, overhead, and time! Thanks; very refreshing Mr. Wong!!!
Mr. Wong, I started photography as a hobby in 1986, and had the honor of working in the photography industry in Chicago in the mid-late 1990s, supplying professionals like yourself. I wasn't in sales, but rental and repair. You spoke accurately about the investments needed in equipment, and, the decisions to upgrade or completely change camera systems/formats; it should never be a rush decision! I had a difficult trying accepting digital as a format, even though my favorite medium was Polaroid! Great videos, Mr. Wong!
It always wiser to buy MFT gears used. Recently i upgraded to em1 II because the last seller decided to go FF, so here is it, spent 380USD for a camera thar can do 1s handheld at ISO400 with Lumix 7-14 F4 lens, I need that motion blur on my snaps, so I will cling on Olympus for the time being.
Good on you Robin. Keep doing what you are doing please. I think your street photography is 2nd to none, and you have inspired me heaps up to now, so I'm looking forward to what you do in the future.
THANK YOU Robin, your video speaks to me from heart. I do not earn so much money, too. And the hype of the OM1 is suggesting, that all is better in opposite to the older OMD 1Mark II/III. Are they now bad cameras? I have spent many effort, to save the money to buy an OMD 1 II. And I was satisfied with the camera. So you make courage to stay with it. 👍
You have pointed out a fundamental truth about any and all commercial businesses. Any and all new equipment is a cost against the business and should be justified through extra income, better productivity or cost saving compared to existing tools/machinery/computers/cameras/trucks/tractors/whatever.
Robin, this is refreshing and why I follow your posts. The mantra of bigger, better, more expensive kit to improve your photography is what the manufacturers espouse, but that doesn't necessarily contribute to the professional's bottom line or improvement of the enthusiast's skills. Horses for courses as the British are fond of saying.
I don't own a Mk III, but I know from watching video reviews the eye A/F is much better than the Mk ii, and from what I've read, the OM 1 is even better. That alone is enough for me to want to get OM 1 and skip the Mk iii. It's not always about IQ, sometimes it's about improvements on features that allow you to do your job more efficiently.
@@robinwong Hello Robin... , Have you received my email about a Telegram and a prize won...?? 🤔, I ask you if that is authentic or a hoax... 🤔 Greetings
Oh Robin how I wish you were still on board the ship, I have been using Olympus Cameras for years now and love them, what you are saying is fair enough and I'm not going to argue as I still love my MK2, the new OM-1 has been a worthwhile upgrade for me and I love it, I'm not sure if you have used one as yet, anyway I still love and appreciate your work and really hope you don't drift away, anyway all good points and just proves how good the Olympus system was and still is, the OM-1 is a appreciated evolution of that very system and my new OM-1 has Olympus proudly displayed and that means a lot to me
@@robinwong This OM-1 is special then with the Olympus name on it, would dearly love to hear your thoughts and set ups, tricks and tips and all your usual stuff on the OM-1, anyway keep up your great work and thanks for that
I was a long time Panasonic user but I wanted to see what the Olympus would do with its focusing system... And I found out that the EM1 Mark II was a game changer. I recently bought a used Olympus set that had the pro lenses that I wanted and a Mark III body. I have to say that I'm really seriously considering selling the Mark 3 to recoup some of the money spent on the lens kit because the two has done such a great job for me so I can easily see where you are coming from. In the end it is all about the images and quite frankly I'm pretty happy with the Mark II.. and for video I have a full frame Panasonic S5 so I feel like my bases are covered and not really needing all the so-called latest and greatest...
@@robinwong I agree Robin.. I had purchased a few Olympus 4/3 lenses with an MMF 3 adapter.. like the 50-100 2.8.. and on the G9 it was absolutely useless.. but on the EM1 Mark II it just snapped right into place like it was a current lens.. same goes for my 8 mm and my 12-60 2.8 4/3 zoom.. that legacy Glass by the way is amazing if the lenses are in good shape...
@@robinwong I bought a GH6. Many complain about the autofocus. I'm happy with it. I had a Nikon D70, a Nikon D300, an OM-D EM-5, an EM-5 III, an EM-1 II and an EM-1 III. Then I bought a used GH5 for videography. And now a GH6. I like the Olympus cameras, but to be honest, I feel at home with the GH5 and GH6. The video performance is awesome. The photo autofocus is very fast. And with the right settings, the autofocus on videos also works very well.
In my opinion, you are a voice of reason. Keep telling it like it is, and keep shooting what suits YOUR needs. Most people buy what they want rather than what they need, and I am not only referring to camera gear here. I recently unsubscribed to another UA-cam channel where the message was that the poster/creator of this channel felt sorry for himself after buying all sorts of Leica cameras because he could not afford their best lenses to go along with those camera bodies. Good lord, if you consider that sort of thing a problem, you had a pretty easy life. Anyways, thanks for sharing, I always enjoy your content. Ciao from Portugal. Jan.
Robin, thanks for a good down to earth video. Another factor to consider is which region you live in the World. The further away from the Equator and Mediterranean regions the lower the light and longer the winters.
Hi Robin, I made the same decision as you did and will be staying with my existing Olympus camera bodies (two E-M1X plus my wife's E-M1 Mark III). Based on the work that I do, my E-M1X bodies more than meet my professional and personal needs. I just didn't see a sufficient difference with the OM-1 to justify making a business investment for that particular camera. What many folks don't realize or appreciate is that professional photographers need to be very conscious of their cash flow as well as their depreciation schedule. In Canada camera gear is written down by 10% in the first year of professional ownership, then at 20% on the declining balance from that point onward. This means that it takes many years to recoup most of the cash flow that has been invested in camera gear. I've been moving away from client assignments the past year or so, but when I was very active with client business my specialty was industrial safety videos. As long as I created videos that met the communication needs of my clients, all of them could have cared less about the camera gear that I used to create their projects. For many years I used Nikon gear for my paid client weork before moving to Olympus gear in June 2019. Pro photographers tend to keep their gear for longer periods of time than do typical consumers. This really just comes down to business considerations and getting the most ROI from the camera equipment that they own. Tom
The Olympus OM-D E-M1X ... is a fantastic camera... 👌🏻👍🏻💖💖 , I don't see that it has such worse differences with respect to the new Olympus - OM SYSTEM OM-1 ... , I even see , in my point of view , that the E-M1X still has some better features than the new OM-1 ... , such as ergonomics and grip... , the fact that it has a built-in field sensor and GPS as well I see it as a superior and more useful feature for me , and I have not had any problems with high ISO in low light photography either... 👌🏻👍🏻 Greetings
@@joanantonim.p.2400 Hi Joan, I have large hands and I absolutely love the comfort and handling of the E-M1X. I regularly shoot my E-m1X at ISO-6400 and have gone a bit higher on occasion. I've owned full frame, APS-C and Nikon 1 gear in the past. The E-M1X is the finest camera I've ever owned regardless of sensor size. Tom
Thanks for the great input Thomas, and we are in the same conclusion that we need to weigh in business factor in decision making, cameras are costs to the business! You are right about clients being happy with results and not caring about system of choice, same for me too here!
Great video. A lot of what you say here makes sense and it is honestly how I operate when deciding to buy new equipment or not. I'm using a Mk II currently and thought about upgrading to the Mk III, 1X or the OM1... but I was hoping to get considerably better performance for my money before coming out of pocket. So far, I have found software solutions to my noise issues the best upgrade... I think I'll keep my camera for now.
I have seen in two tests that the OM 1 is no better than my E1 Mark III up to ISO 6400, which is why I am not buying the OM 1 either. I preferred to buy the Olympus 100-400. I have much more of it for my photography.
That’s a great choice! I’m also saving for the 100-400. Although some say it’s not super sharp at 400mm, just imagining all the cool stuff I can do with an AF super telephoto lens makes me smile.
@@siyuq5620 In good lighting conditions, the lens is of a great quality and at a very good price. I am happy. When I am on the road, then often only with the 12-100 and with the 100-400. That is all covered.
@@robinwong Exactly, dear Robin. I do the same. Unless I'm shooting in handheld highres; then I can go up to ISO 6400. Everything beyond that is rather theoretical and of importance for pixel peepers.
The ISO performance of the OM-1 is actually quite fantastic. Side by side with an A7IV it's honestly not much worse, and the sensor speed is MUCH slower on the A7IV with a maximum fps of 10(but more like 6-7 if you're doing lossless). It's all about needs. OM-1 is aimed at wildlife photographers, which it definitely is better than the A7IV at with the exception of low light performance(but not by much).
Hey Robin, great video. I definitely agree with you regarding not needing to get the best and for most people the OM-1 is not something they will see a need to get it. But I definitely do think the OM-1 is better than those other cameras in that price range (R6 and A7IV) ONLY in terms of speed and in action photography. If you shoot street it definitely not something you'll see a benefit from. Great video.
Recently, I finally splurged and got an Em1Mk2 renewed body to partner with my PenF. Wonderful! “Discounts” and business needs matter! I’m not a pro, and your logic seems sound to me. True story: about 55 years ago, I was having a coffee with my mother and I announced I was plunging into photography and truly passionate about the whole idea! Her response was, “thank goodness I hadn’t chosen race horses to invest in!” Lol! She was right, of course! Robin, your talents & skills are solid!
Hi Robin! It'sso satisfying to be you! I totally agree with you! You are the most ethical person and professional person I know, honestly,, I enjoy see you and all your videos, your comments have the sense and sincerity we all need, I'm a Olympus user sin e 1974, I sad to know the new company doesn't keep you as an ambassador, still following you
This would be my dream camera if I were in the market for one. But in the meantime, I am more than happy with my EM-5 Mark III and EM-10 Mark III and Pen E-PL 7, which I use as backups. If you include film cameras, I already have too many and do not want to give in to GAS.
Thankfully I’m not the only one in the minority. I respect your honest review of the new features in the OM-1. I have felt the same way. I do not feel that the updates made to the OM-1 are enough for me to upgrade from my E-M1x. A great many of the features I have no use for in my landscape photography. I am perfectly happy with my E-M1x,
Fair review I think. No one should be pressured any one into buying anything let alone something they don't need. Though I hope someone buys it. I just recently bought into the whole MFT thing. I appreciate that the products are very good for hiking and backpacking, which I do a lot of. I hope OMDS sell enough to continue making and improving the product.
It's refreshing to see a working professional outlining the case for (or against) buying the latest gear. Too many people seem to assume that professionals just fart money every time they take a picture and that they will always have the latest gear. The truth has always been more nuanced, and may professionals make do with what works, rather than what is the shiniest/trendiest piece of equipment. I've switched to Panasonic after nearly 30 years with Canon (the EOS 1 was my first Canon camera). I haven't done this because Panasonic is better, but because I needed to shoot more video for clients and Panasonic beat Canon on that score. It also worked out cheaper to make the switch than stay with Canon, so again and economic consideration. Thanks for bringing this subject to the fore, well done.
Robin, great video as always. You remain my favorite reference in photography is the micro four thirds and I really appreciate your intellectual and professional honesty. Well done! I am a happy owner of the OM-1 which I believe to be very good but, as you say, it is definitely not WOW ;-) however it is a great camera.
For the work you do, I think any EM5.2 / f/1.8 combination would serve. The only downside would be the lack of 4K video and most of us still view the majority of content in 1080p. You’re right on all counts and far enough ahead of the game in terms of real needs to be future-proof for years to come.
Hi Robin! I'm so glad you put things in perspective and worded my very thoughts so well. As an Olympus and Sony user, I'm aware of the pros and cons of both systems, and I totally agree with what you said, if one were to spend all what the new OM1 costs, why not spend the same amount of money on a more capable, yet heavier, piece of equipment, with better performance in the iso and DR department, like a Sony a7iii, which I happen to have. I think M43 makers have, little by little, moved away from the initial advantage that that system used to offer compared to FF, and full frame cameras have been getting smaller and smaller, to a point that nowadays it's really hard to see a clear advantage of siding with M43 cameras. Let's see how much longer all this lasts. The OM1 might be a rebirth of M43, which I hope, or just the last gasps of air of an agonizing system. Only time will tell.
Full frame cameras are getting lighter but their lenses aren’t. Carry a few full frame lenses in a camera bag for a day and you’ll be knackered by the time you get home! 😬
Thanks Jose, I was hoping that OM-1 would be priced lower. Well, if their original bold claim of 2 stops better high ISO holds any water, then the price is justified for sure. But that's obviously not the case.
The reason I keep coming back to this channel, besides Robin's great energy, is that he's a straight shooter. I have no interest in getting the OM-1, but I enjoy seeing all the different perspectives on this new camera. I can't speak for the UK or Malaysia, but the US is a massive country, and while our popular UA-camrs from places like LA, NY, etc... may constantly be upgrading to the latest and greatest, I can assure you Robin, most people are not. Especially not right now. These new cameras cost as much as a month's rent is costing people in even low income areas today. Therefore, I think this video is very relevant right now to what's going on in the world.
I partially agree, I sold my em1 markii and markiii with some lenses I never or hardly used and was able to get the OM-1 for just 450 euro! That in my opinion was a no brainer. The new features on the OM-1 are very welcome and the subject ai works great for my style of shooting (mostly wildlife and BIF) I still have my EM1X but I am going to trade that in also for another OM-1 body when they will be in stock more regularly. So if you are able to get a good price for your old camera's than trading them in for the OM-1 is definitely worth considering.
I fully agree with you, I own an EM1 MarkII and it's still an excellent camera. In fact much better than I photographer. Now I am the weakest link in the chain :D.
Thanks for this video! I am always thankful for those who talk sense instead of just praising the latest upgrades. The OM-1 doesn't bring you more business, but it does even less to hobbyists like me. Of course I want hand held high-res and live ND, but other than that it would give me NOTHING over my E-M1 II, but for a HUGE price.
Well said Robin! If you don’t need it don’t buy it! If what you have is doing the job there is no need to buy a new camera just to have the latest kit! Sounds like a sound business decision to me!
I have an EM1 MKii ( OK, I also have a few other digital cameras but they are all old, obsolete if you believed the marketing jives ). It does whetever I want. I don't shoot birds, chickens, sparrows, nor do I need two dozen auto focus modes. I don't do video, I think EM1 MKII does 4K or something similar. I still use my EM5 MKii and I don't feel that I am missing on anything for what I am shooting. If sports, ' wildlife ' or ' fashion ' photography is your thing, then you might consider something like the OM System or the new Nikon Z9 monster, but there deep pockets are required.
If I was using S-AF and MF the majority of the time I wouldn't bother with an upgrade to an OM-1 either. For birds in flight though I think the ISO and tracking / focus upgrades will definitely bring increased productivity. In saying that - I'm happy with my Om-D E-M1 Mkii and simply working within its limitations for my bird photography.
Take an OM-1 or EM10 markII or EM1 markII or EM5 Mark II. Make some good shots and use all bodies in the same situation or same image in the EVF. Ask people what photos correspond to what cameras. I am sure that the conclusion will be not the same for everybody. Technological evolution is made by litle steps. You should buy the latest camera if money is no issue or if there is a specific feature that is very important for your work. That's just my point of view... Thank you Robin for one more nice and honest video !
I've been on the fence about the R7 because of it's amazing autofocus. I have a lumix G9 that I love everything about EXCEPT it's crappy autofocus! But if I get the R7 I'd have to invest in lenses where as if I got the OM-1 I'd have all of my awesome leica lenses. I know that the OM-1 has better autofocus than the G9 so that's kind of the way I'm leaning since I do a lot bird's in flight and military jet photography and the G9 just doesn't autofocus well on those. Decisions decisions... Lol
Perhaps 62 years experience in photography may give credibility to my perspective. I have used formats from the old Minox 8mm sub-miniature film (but more often, the Minolta 16mm sub-miniatures) through 8"x10" view cameras, and digital cameras from the first through my latest, but not THE latest, Sony A7R III with high resolution and focus stacking so that I often have several gigabytes' information in one final image. I've used these primarily for photojournalism, including 15 years for major world publications around Asia, (Karachi>KL>Kuantan>Kalinga, Robin) but I've done just about everything in between. Vogue cover, weddings, the birth of children including my own, focus stacked looks into agates and fossils. One of my Micro 4/3 focus stacks was just mounted 16' x 9' on two walls of a new complex; it is spectacular. Wish I could include an image of it. There is a visible difference in the technical quality, of course there is, but in any photography that counts as soul-food, the emotional impact is far, far more vital than how many pixels are involved. The most important tool in your photography is your brain! Help it run smoothly, perception through execution and presentation, and you'll be far better along than the poor forum people worrying incessantly about a few grams or millimeters or pixels. I have two OM-D E-M1 Mk IIIs, do not anticipate upgrading from them in Micro 4/3. I did get rid of an OM-D E-M1 Mk II, not because it had perceptibly lower performance, but because Olympus moved things around in the menu and camera controls. Fluency is key, Perception is King. Terimah kasi.
I upgraded from the E-M1 to the E-M1 mark ii because I thought the improvement in the sensor was enough to warrant the cost. Since then I have stayed with the mki ii. Lenses, lighting, backgrounds etc. are also important.
Good points on earning power and providing value as a pro photographer vs enthusiast or hobbyist. I visited a camera store and the GH6 was in stock. I was more interested in the "old" em-1 mk3 and g9 for many reasons you stated. I'm not a professional and the OM1 or GH6 are not a big leap. The other brands have impressive gear but enough to make me switch not even close. I'll keep looking at what's going on and stay on the fence for now.
I've seen plenty of top notch photographers in 2021, healthy paid on stage, shooting with their 5Dmkll and 5Dmklll and being perfectly fine with their clients. May be they just know how to take good pictures?
This is what most business people call a "cost / benefit analysis". You definitely want the benefits gained from a purchase to justify the cost of making the purchase. As long as your current gear meets your needs, there's no reason to upgrade. Over the last year, I replaced my Nikon D800 and Sony AX100 cameras with a GH5M2 and now a GH6. I went this direction since 90% of my business is video, and I like the video options in the Lumix line. I expect to keep using these cameras for 10 years or more, regardless of what other cameras come out during that time. At some point, I may replace my DVX200 camcorder with another mirrorless, but for now, it makes a great C camera. In my work, the 5.7k video from the GH6 with a wide angle lens allows me to do enough post-process cropping to make a locked-off camera work like a 2nd camera operator, and that alone justified the purchase.
Hi Robin. Just subbed. I have an old OM1 film camera. Well an OM1N.🤣😅😂 A lot cheaper. Cannot afford the new top tier digital stuff but I love the OMD EM10II, which was the most gorgeous little camera I had ever seen. It rekindled my liking for the brand. I'm just getting a nice version of a secondhand OMD EM1 first version. That's affordable to me now! At last!🤣🍺👍
I agree with you. Therefore with the cost and my interest in portrait photography I have switched to Nikon Z7ii instead of upgrading my em1 mkII; it is a high investment but I really want more resolutions for cropping photos. I am not going to ditch my Olympus OM system as I do take avian shots occasionally and with my Leica 100400 I can get amazing photos. Anyhow first time I am doing my comment and a pat on the back to you. PS. Just bought you a coffee also. Cheers!
Hi Robin, I understand fully what you said and agree! Also, I would recommend not wasting your time with people that are critical, it is not worth it and you are a fantastic person! I can only recommend you focus on creation of beautiful pictures, your art, your business and cut off the negative people around you, you are not bound to communicate with people if you do not wish to! Keep up the fantastic work friend! :)
Wonderfully honest. I needed a reliable view of the new sensors high iso performance. (MFT will be great in 10 years.) After this video I will not upgrade from my em1 ii. I am now planning to keep my EM-1 and jump to Fuji APSC H2 next year when this camera appears. Many thanks.
You are absolutely correct. Just because you are a professional photographer doesn’t mean you have to buy every new whiz bang camera that comes out. I don’t use half the features on my camera.I don’t do video and I don’t need 12fps or super fast focusing in my style of photography. I totally agree with you.
Totally agree. I am a pro snapper in the UK. My E M1 MkII is still going strong, I have now had 3 of them! I will keep this one and add the MkIII soon. The MkIII is of course now discontinued, but for me it will do what I want, cost me less and give great results.
It's good that you remind people about the differences in earning power between economies like the U.S. and Europe versus the rest of the world. In this age of global communications, we need to remember that not everyone lives where we do or to the same standards.
This deserves a pin!
UK and US have resilient economies yes, but quality of life does not correlate much with this. These are particularly stressful areas to live and work in - more people can afford a £2k camera here, but we're getting fat, autistic, stressed, and detached from nature in the process. Could be a long debate. Eitherway, that E-M5iii is looking superb.
@@LexTNeville agreed. I was just referencing people’s purchasing ability, which we sometimes forget varies by country.
In any economy, the bottom line for a professional photographer should be whether this new camera would increase my income?
Sometimes, new convenience features would do it. Internal ND filters could be big deal for landscape photographers and videographers. This camera might do it for wildlife and sports photographers.
That earning power in the west is about to change I think! To the negative.
This is exactly what I like about Robin’s channel. It represents much better the needs of real people, but he gives us the quality of professional grade photographers. Photography involves knowing and working with the limitations of the equipment and environment. Robin’s experience working with the Olympus system finding workarounds in low light, street portraits, wild life, gives me goals to strive for.
I disagree with you. Robin has a limited range of subjects in his business. I fully understand his comments for his type of photography but it certainly doesn't match the wide range of subjects that a lot of us photograph.
@@brianlaunchbury4491 I understand that not all photographers have the same needs a Robin. That statement applies to all photographers, really.
But what I like about Robin’s channel is that he is not selling you new gear. His creative ways of using m43 gear for his photography is refreshing.
For example, he explains that he uses the m.zuiko 75 f1.8 as a substitute for a 70-200 f2.8 full frame, for his paid work.
Not everyone can do this, but for a casual photographer wanting to enjoy a social event without lugging huge gear and wanting great results, mimicking Robin is actually a good strategy.
Yes, there are other alternatives, but I like Robin’s.
Thanks Eric, appreciate that a lot
@@brianlaunchbury4491 but you don't see 99% of the images I do for my business. I can't be posting my clients images here without permission.
@@robinwong I just subbed. I also just saw the video where you quit as a Visionary. A shame and seems very shortsighted by the new company. Still, you are completely free to speak now! I always had a soft spot for Olympus cameras since 1981 or so.
Excellent vlog .. too many people just want to buy the latest gear .. when they don’t know his to get the best from their old gear .. 👍
Yeah I agree with you Rob, knowing your gear is important
@Eckart Hofmann That reminds me, I should dust off my E-P1 and take it for a spin...
Love your passion without fanboyism. I appreciate UA-camrs who don’t always push the latest stuff.
Robin, I can't recall ever seeing a better case statement. You're correct -- ''The right tool for the job' should guide us all when staring down new gear hype. Please accept my compliments for your passionate and spontaneous presentation. Yours is credible because it obviously came directly from the mind and the heart. You broke the UA-cam host mode of relying on notes, with the constant looking down. You spoke directly from start to conclusion. I too will be staying with my 5-MK III and 1-MK III.
Awwww... you have no idea how much this means to me. You made my day!
To be entirely honest I did look at my phone for notes from time to time in between takes. But thanks so much
I saw some comments, specially the guy saying that Robin haven’t seen his “great” work (he didn’t use the word great but it was like he was conveying that). Robin explained in a very clear English language that it was not necessary for his work to have more expensive equipment but if you need it you go for it. Also he explained the principles of economy that apply to his very specific case in the country in which he lived. He is a humble person that doesn’t go around bragging about his achievements or gear, just being contented with what he can do within his means. Kudos to Robin for sharing and teaching us. Some people never learns.
Very well reasoned, Robin. I'm sure many purchasers of the OM-1 are buying it just because they can, and want "the latest" even if they have no real need for it. It's all part of today's consumer-oriented world where buying things is some people's major means of satisfaction in life.
Nothing wrong to get the OM-1 or any latest gear too, if you can afford them
Robin, you are a true professional and a great mentor. You make sensible decisions for the practical benefit of your business, and put them in context when sharing so that it does not come across as preaching to others to follow. You deserve a huge audience because you share generous amounts of knowledge and wisdom, in between showcasing your talent. And you do it with approachable style. Watching your videos is always a treat for me.
If I would own the Olympus EM1 MkIII, I would not buy the OM1 to replace. You are right Robin in your point of view.
Thanks
Robin, you make good points. I tend to purchase cameras in the middle of their life cycle so I am not paying a premium price. I am also a hobbyist so I can wait it out. I also feel at current camera price points more systems need to be explored going forward. As you said the right tool for the right job. Overall my E-M1 Mk II is still plenty of camera for me at the moment.
i still use e-5 mirror 12mpx and very happy ^-)
@@bonjour88-x7u me too!
Yeah the pricing though! Seriously, not justified
@@ridealongwithrandy I'm careful with that combination of words. But I feel the same way about the camera. I bought a new E-M1 Mk II with 45mm/f1.2 PRO for 800 Euros a year ago on sale. Gotta love that.
@@robinwong "Yeah the pricing though! Seriously, not justified"
It might depend on your current system. Like the commenter, I'm an advanced hobbyist and I tend to buy cameras in the middle of their life cycle. I currently have an E-M5 Mk II, and 90% of the time I use it with the 12-40mm f2.8 PRO lens. I was getting very close to upgrading to an E-M1 Mk III, which is now in the middle of its life cycle, but decided to wait and see what the new OM-1 was like. At this point, either the E-M1 III or the OM-1 are worthwhile upgrades from the E-M5 II, but now that I've waited this long, I feel like the extra US $500 for the OM-1 is probably worthwhile.
Having said that, I fully agree that the OM-1 is probably not a reasonable upgrade from an E-M1 Mk III, unless there's a very specific use case that benefits a lot from one of the improvements.
Robin, I can’t thank you enough for your honesty and the countless hours creating these videos to educate us toward a more informed decision. You speak articulately and passionately.
I have an OM-D EM-5 (which made me fall in love with its image quality and color rendering). But your review on the EM-1 mark ll convinced me upgrading to it would be a more powerful and enjoyable camera to use. A mint condition EM1-mk ll found on eBay and very happy. I love that your reviews consider economics before selecting an upgrade.
I trust YOUR reviews, as highly paid photographers in US have a different perspective (out of touch with most budgets).
You have earned my respect for your selfless and thorough, common sense reviews. Your customers are very lucky to have you. Thank you again.
I’m with you Robin, I have 2 EM1Xs, an EM5mkiii for UA-cam videos and I don’t see a good enough reason to upgrade. U n like you who runs a business, I on the other hand run a business called retirement, and upgrading is not worth the expenditure nor can I afford it. I have more than enough cameras and I don’t even use more than 50% of the camera abilities. On a side note, I will not give up my sensors on the EM1Xs. I go out in the desert and enjoy knowing my altitude, air pressure, compass directions, and GPS locations. I also shoot Nikon D500, and the D750. If one goes to the Photons to Photos website, the dynamic range of the OM-1(new) vs the EM1 Mkii shows that the EM1mkii has much better dynamic range. How can that be, according to the charts, the EM1 mkii has the best dynamic range, best low light ISO, and the best low light EV of ALL the OM-Ds and the new OM-1(new). I say OM-1(new) because I have the original OM-2n, and the OM2SP. Heehee Cheers!
👌🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Thanks for sharing Randy, appreciate it and you already have such a great setup to begin with!
I actually have three Olympus OM-1. They are all around 45 years old, though.
The camera body is in fact the least important (to a degree) factor to become successful as a photographer. For digital photography I only have one camera, an Olympus Pen-F, and I don't have any wish to switch it for some other. It can do anything I want (and much more) and delivers the data quality I need.
Yes, yes, yes 👏 !
Thanks Robert, you have the best OM-1 I believe!
I got the OM-1 for my wildlife photography and I can say that I am shooting hummingbird images at ISO 12,800 where before I wouldn't dare shoot over ISO 6400. I am getting very good images at high ISO now where before I didn't. I am loving the images I am getting from this camera. It may not be for everyone but I can say that for me its a game changer for my photography so far.
This is exactly what the OM-1 is designed for. By the way, I was surprised at how high ISO has to be used in the tropics. There is very little light in the jungle.
My experience is the same, for photographing birds I get many times more keepers with the OM-1 than with the E-M1 Mk II. Bird recognition and focus tracking are day and night from my previous camera. The faster refresh rate of the EVF makes following birds in flight a lot easier. With noise I dare to say that the noise even if present is more uniform and seems to be predominantly luminamce nose. I have also been happily using higher ISO than in the past. This does not contradict Robin's decision. The tool used needs to match the task and replacing it needs to bring enough benefit to justify the cost.
@@PedroAphalo The position of a hobby photographer is different than that of a professional one. I earn my living in a different way and I photograph for fun. Amateurs justify their equipment purchases because they just like it and want it. If they can afford it, of course. A professional has to take into account the contribution of the new technique to his business. Just as Robin did. I'm willing to travel far and spend some of that money for my photography trips, the business trip has to pay for itself economically. As far as I know photographers with the new OM-1, they are mostly just enthusiasts.
@@konradkopecny5056 I agree. I wrote that the new camera brings improvements for bird photography, and that despite this, Robin's decision makes a lot of sense. There are some professional photographers using the O-M1, at least in Finland. Mostly for nature photography. The point Robin makes about earning power vs. pricing in different countries being a major constraint for many when buying cameras is very true.
That is very exciting to hear. I just ordered one from bird photography in the January sales. I can't wait to try it out in low light conditions, which we see a lot in dingy old England! It is going to be a huge upgrade from my Nikon D7200!
It's really a pity OMD ceased to employ Robin as an Ambassador. He is way better and much more interesting with his reviews than most of the existing ones ....
But I will nevertheless update to the new camera OM-1 ...
Agree. His enthusiasm is unmatched.
No worries Jens, whatever happened has happened and it is time to move on.
@@robinwong We understand Robin but just accept that we love you man. :) Other than a former visionary I know and am friends with. You were my favorite, Jimmy too. You two were always so active and always there to reply to questions and there for Olympus users.
@@robinwong does Nikon have a presence in
Malaysia? You really should be a brand ambassador for somebody!😉
Great points, Robin. If your gear is meeting your expectations then that is good enough!
Thanks, and yeah, sufficiency!
Hello Robin. With this pandemic, it has impacted and still impacts many of us. For momentary and budgetary reasons, it is important to make judicious choices. Your UA-cam channel on Olympus cameras really helped me a lot because there are so many configurations that are hidden in the menus. For my part, OM-1 is what I've been waiting for from Olympus/OM Digital for a long time for several reasons, ergonomics, button and dials, video capabilities (no more small file video segmentation), photo noise control , 2 memory card slots as fast as each other, the tracking for flying birds is fantastic, the menu finally easier to use (major point for myself). By selling my old EM-1 mark II to acquire OM-1, the difference in acquisition cost remains reasonable and makes a lot of sense. I must confess that I was hoping that you would acquire the OM-1 camera and that you would demonstrate the (impressive to me) advantages of the new camera. For my part, you are the source of reference, the best teacher and popularizer to use the functions of Olympus cameras to their full potential. I hope one day to see you again with an OM-1 camera (when it makes sense to you for its features and economically) explaining the new OM-1 menus, new features and demonstrating the benefits of this little gem of camera because you are one of the best teachers in the field! I sincerely hope that your UA-cam channel will continue to grow (as a further aid to your income).
Thanks for the support. Appreciate you being here, but OM-1 won't happen. That shop has sailed, and I have to move on. I hope you understand
I just upgraded to OM-1 from EM1M3. I see significant improvement in image quality and AF performance is too a new high level. I do understand your viewpoint, Robin, but it should not discourage people from trying it out. Guys, do try it out before you say I won't buy.
Wow talk about getting animated over all the different makes of cameras and types of cameras in general you put your point across very well indeed. You have the current cameras that you need for your professional photographer work. Thank you for being so succinct and honest Mr Wong.
Thanks, I try my best to be as honest as I can
Bravo!!! Well reasoned and well presented. So nice to see a logical and reasoned approach to gear. Thank you!
Heyyyyyyyy Kirk! So so happy to see you here again. Thanks for the kind words.
I switched from EM1 mk2 to Sony A7III and love the sony much more. I can take good pics with the EM1 but it's just more limited. Eye AF is amazing and the better dynamic range helps a ton when you mess up.
Robin,
Due to your background and experience with the Olympus system and products, we all want to know your opinion on the OM1. That doesn’t mean that you have to purchase one OM1 to test it and review it. Somehow, get a loaner camera and let us know, what you think, if possible.
How to get a loaner?
I imagine, from a fellow photographer in your area. Through your contacts in the industry. Perhaps a rental from a camera rental service in your area if that service exist.
I would gladly lend you mine, but I am still waiting for it, with no date in sight.
It can’t be that difficult, Robin Wong is famous!
I agree that for many, the pursuit of gear has overtaken developing skills. I was a very early adopter of the classic Canon 5D. I used that camera for over 10 years before I bought my first M43 camera, and Olympus EP3. After eight years, mirrorless technology advanced sufficiently for me to take the next step, and I bought an EM1.2. That camera, my EP3 and the older Canons still take great photos, but because I do wildlife and motorsports photography as a hobby, the next step up to an OM-1 makes sense. However, it will likely be my last camera as I am nearing retirement.
I love love love the original Canon 5D!
This has happened with my other interest in electronic music in the past 15 years, especially withanalogue synthesizers. There is a lot of snobbery in that area. So many videos and posts are all about what gear people have that others don't have - rather than having any music on them!
I tell you that is one of your best, informative and eye opening video recently. BTW, you are the honestly youtuber who didn't change during covid-19 pandemic time. you stay with both leg on the ground and not going with hype.
Thanks for the kind words! Appreciate the support
To me it's the only MFT camera with a usable autofocus, if I ever need it.
If there were more people like Robin Wong in the world it would be a beautiful place! Love your work man!
Thanks for sharing. Good points from my perspective at least.
Thanks! Enjoyed your OM-1 impressions
Robin...I started watching your videos a few years ago. I started with a ep1..then em10...then Em1Mk2. I use my cameras in my work as a newspaper reporter, and also as a hobby. I appreciate your honesty and passion for the craft, and the many things I have learned from your videos. Thanks so much for all you do!
You correctly concluded that in your case that the cost benefit isn't there for you and would have come to the same conclusion, nice vlog. For me replacing my aging EM10Mk1, I debated between getting the EM1Mk3, now reduced in price, or OM1 and considered moving to FF Nikon Z6ii similarly priced body. My choice of getting the OM1 was driven by the following: wanting to keep the camera-lens combo size down for travel and extra cost of system switch for similar lens capability (about $1500 more) eliminated the FF option, this being a long term commitment (8-10yrs) in a new camera I was hesitant to start off with an already 3yrs old model, and hope to appreciate having the better EVF and processing speed of the OM1 for computational features as a bonus not forgetting firmware updates. Video does not matter for me, IQ was not a consideration.
Of course, if cost is not an issue, you can afford it, go for OM-1, it is the best Micro Four Thirds camera today
The right tool for the right job is what's important. I love bird photography and the 2x reach advantage plus the smaller lenses seem ideal with OM-1. The recent improvements in AF and the fact that it's much faster being a stacked sensor makes the OM-1 a fantastic upgrade for me from Canon 7Dmk2 if I can get hold of one and get rid of some older Canon stuff. In the UK we are not rolling in money either and the price of Canon and Sony is ridiculous for us too. The US prices seem better. If I was doing photography professionally weddings and events etc I would rather use full frame or even Fuji GFX100s. I would buy grey market from HK as I said UK prices are ridiculous.
I'd get full frame, but probably not the medium format - bigger files for weddings is nightmare, trust me
You may want to wait a couple weeks to see what Canon comes out with at the end of this month. There are strong rumors that they're about to announce an R7, the first APS-C camera in the new mirrorless R-series. That would allow you to keep shooting with any lenses you already have for use with your 7D Mark II. You'll need an adapter to do that, but many report there's no loss of performance adapting EF/EF-S lenses for use on the R-system. Some users even say they feel the lenses work even better adapted, than they did on their DSLRs. One caveat... Apparently some 3rd party lenses don't adapt well, if you have any of those. But any problems seem to be older 3rd lenses, not those currently in production.
Of course, there wouldn't be as much reduction in size and weight as with the OM-1... Since you'd be using the same lenses on the same sensor format with an R7. There may be some minor size and weight reduction in the camera body itself, somewhat offset by needing to use am adapter. But if you eventually migrate to the RF lenses there will be additional size/weight savings. For example, both the RF 70-200s are considerably smaller and lighter than their EF counterparts. The RF 100-500mm not only has 100mm more reach than the EF 100-400mm II, but it also weighs about a half lb. less.
I'm not knocking the new OM-1... In fact if it lives up to the claims, it sounds like a very nice camera and I've recommended it to some sports and wildlife shooters for consideration. But it's different when you are looking at changing systems, since you'll need a whole new kit of camera and lenses, while taking significant loss selling your used gear. It's usually easier and much less expensive to upgrade within your current system, if possible.
P.S. Keep in mind that your UK prices include VAT. Here in the US sales taxes are added to the prices you see listed. That varies by state and even city... But, for example, where I live the sales tax in almost 10%, on top of that list price. Even if I buy from a seller in another state, they have to collect the sales tax and send it to my local tax collector.
@@alanm.4298 Thanks for the reply and yes I never rush to buy will wait as you say see what Canon does but I don't see them doing a stacked crop sensor it's quite usual for Canon to create new models from old sensors for years to come. The 90d/M6mk2 sensor it seems is what the rumors suggest they will use. That is not a match for the OM-1 stacked sensor it will be a disappointment. Fuji are also coming out with a stacked sensor soon. You really need to see the prices of the RF lenses in our UK camera stores. One Canon lens price equals equivalent Olympus lens plus new Camera plus another lens. Have a look at the prices in the link. www.srsmicrosystems.co.uk/lenses/canon-rf
You will downgrade if you go from 7Dmk2 to OM-1. Don’t be fooled by the m4/3 fanatics. Get yourself a r7 if the r5/r6 is to expensive. It gives you a much bigger sensor and much better autofocus and it’s cheaper.
And the OM sensor is inferior to other stacked sensors with its slow read speeds. Believe me, the noise in m4/3 is crazy, and this new sensor is just slightly better then the old.
Youre missing out...the OM-1 is state of th art and a clear improvement on all previous cameras...
My mother in law is a pro photographer, she still runs a fuji xt3 and old Nikon d80 for certain situations. When i ask her why she hasn't upgraded her reply was interesting.
(Paraphrasing)
"Id like to have a brand new camera, but these fit my needs just fine, i know they're bulletproof, and i know how the results will turn out. I upgraded to mirrorless purely because holding a DSLR all day got exhausting. Super high resolution images just take up way too much space for limited benefit."
It's an interesting perspective to have.
After all they did to you, I wouldn’t get one either. I do love my OM-1.
No worries, what happened has happened, and I don't make my decisions based on emotions.
First, you have a great review of the Olympus E-1, and, made it fun to step back and just enjoy the craft! Now, this honest and clear information about what it takes to be a professional photographer, the investments in equipment, overhead, and time! Thanks; very refreshing Mr. Wong!!!
Thanks, I share what I can
Mr. Wong, I started photography as a hobby in 1986, and had the honor of working in the photography industry in Chicago in the mid-late 1990s, supplying professionals like yourself. I wasn't in sales, but rental and repair. You spoke accurately about the investments needed in equipment, and, the decisions to upgrade or completely change camera systems/formats; it should never be a rush decision! I had a difficult trying accepting digital as a format, even though my favorite medium was Polaroid! Great videos, Mr. Wong!
It always wiser to buy MFT gears used. Recently i upgraded to em1 II because the last seller decided to go FF, so here is it, spent 380USD for a camera thar can do 1s handheld at ISO400 with Lumix 7-14 F4 lens, I need that motion blur on my snaps, so I will cling on Olympus for the time being.
The 5-Axis IS is amazing right, even on the older E-M1 Mark II!
Good on you Robin. Keep doing what you are doing please. I think your street photography is 2nd to none, and you have inspired me heaps up to now, so I'm looking forward to what you do in the future.
THANK YOU Robin, your video speaks to me from heart. I do not earn so much money, too.
And the hype of the OM1 is suggesting, that all is better in opposite to the older OMD 1Mark II/III.
Are they now bad cameras?
I have spent many effort, to save the money to buy an OMD 1 II. And I was satisfied with the camera.
So you make courage to stay with it. 👍
E-M1 Mark II is an amazing camera! I still use it
Yes. If only a new camera is out - the older isn't bad.
You have pointed out a fundamental truth about any and all commercial businesses. Any and all new equipment is a cost against the business and should be justified through extra income, better productivity or cost saving compared to existing tools/machinery/computers/cameras/trucks/tractors/whatever.
Yeah things are different when business decisions start to play a part, not just getting the camera for fun anymore!
Stellar video and sound advice for 99.9% of photographers upgrades.
Robin, this is refreshing and why I follow your posts. The mantra of bigger, better, more expensive kit to improve your photography is what the manufacturers espouse, but that doesn't necessarily contribute to the professional's bottom line or improvement of the enthusiast's skills. Horses for courses as the British are fond of saying.
I don't own a Mk III, but I know from watching video reviews the eye A/F is much better than the Mk ii, and from what I've read, the OM 1 is even better. That alone is enough for me to want to get OM 1 and skip the Mk iii. It's not always about IQ, sometimes it's about improvements on features that allow you to do your job more efficiently.
👌🏻👍🏻👍🏻🙏🏻
Great reflection and thought , Robin... 👌🏻👍🏻
👋🏻🙋🏻♂
Cheers
@@robinwong Hello Robin... , Have you received my email about a Telegram and a prize won...?? 🤔, I ask you if that is authentic or a hoax... 🤔
Greetings
Here to support you Robin, after watching the Camera Conspiracies video trashing you. keep up the great work Robin.
Oh Robin how I wish you were still on board the ship, I have been using Olympus Cameras for years now and love them, what you are saying is fair enough and I'm not going to argue as I still love my MK2, the new OM-1 has been a worthwhile upgrade for me and I love it, I'm not sure if you have used one as yet, anyway I still love and appreciate your work and really hope you don't drift away, anyway all good points and just proves how good the Olympus system was and still is, the OM-1 is a appreciated evolution of that very system and my new OM-1 has Olympus proudly displayed and that means a lot to me
Unfortunately they also said it would be the last time the name is being kept. Moving on it will be OM System for sure.
@@robinwong This OM-1 is special then with the Olympus name on it, would dearly love to hear your thoughts and set ups, tricks and tips and all your usual stuff on the OM-1, anyway keep up your great work and thanks for that
I really appreciate our honest reason why you are not buying the new camera. It touched many areas that we always needs to consider.
I was a long time Panasonic user but I wanted to see what the Olympus would do with its focusing system... And I found out that the EM1 Mark II was a game changer. I recently bought a used Olympus set that had the pro lenses that I wanted and a Mark III body. I have to say that I'm really seriously considering selling the Mark 3 to recoup some of the money spent on the lens kit because the two has done such a great job for me so I can easily see where you are coming from. In the end it is all about the images and quite frankly I'm pretty happy with the Mark II.. and for video I have a full frame Panasonic S5 so I feel like my bases are covered and not really needing all the so-called latest and greatest...
the only thing that Olympus did differently than Panasonic in AF is using Phase Detect, which I dont understand why panasonic refuses to do so!
@@robinwong I agree Robin.. I had purchased a few Olympus 4/3 lenses with an MMF 3 adapter.. like the 50-100 2.8.. and on the G9 it was absolutely useless.. but on the EM1 Mark II it just snapped right into place like it was a current lens.. same goes for my 8 mm and my 12-60 2.8 4/3 zoom.. that legacy Glass by the way is amazing if the lenses are in good shape...
@@robinwong I bought a GH6. Many complain about the autofocus. I'm happy with it.
I had a Nikon D70, a Nikon D300, an OM-D EM-5, an EM-5 III, an EM-1 II and an EM-1 III. Then I bought a used GH5 for videography. And now a GH6. I like the Olympus cameras, but to be honest, I feel at home with the GH5 and GH6. The video performance is awesome. The photo autofocus is very fast. And with the right settings, the autofocus on videos also works very well.
In my opinion, you are a voice of reason. Keep telling it like it is, and keep shooting what suits YOUR needs. Most people buy what they want rather than what they need, and I am not only referring to camera gear here.
I recently unsubscribed to another UA-cam channel where the message was that the poster/creator of this channel felt sorry for himself after buying all sorts of Leica cameras because he could not afford their best lenses to go along with those camera bodies. Good lord, if you consider that sort of thing a problem, you had a pretty easy life. Anyways, thanks for sharing, I always enjoy your content. Ciao from Portugal. Jan.
Thanks Jan! Appreciate you sharing about the Leica shooter. Yeah for us here in Malaysia one Leica camera can feed us for a year!
Robin, thanks for a good down to earth video. Another factor to consider is which region you live in the World. The further away from the Equator and Mediterranean regions the lower the light and longer the winters.
Some of us here dream of having snow!
Hi Robin,
I made the same decision as you did and will be staying with my existing Olympus camera bodies (two E-M1X plus my wife's E-M1 Mark III). Based on the work that I do, my E-M1X bodies more than meet my professional and personal needs. I just didn't see a sufficient difference with the OM-1 to justify making a business investment for that particular camera.
What many folks don't realize or appreciate is that professional photographers need to be very conscious of their cash flow as well as their depreciation schedule. In Canada camera gear is written down by 10% in the first year of professional ownership, then at 20% on the declining balance from that point onward. This means that it takes many years to recoup most of the cash flow that has been invested in camera gear.
I've been moving away from client assignments the past year or so, but when I was very active with client business my specialty was industrial safety videos. As long as I created videos that met the communication needs of my clients, all of them could have cared less about the camera gear that I used to create their projects. For many years I used Nikon gear for my paid client weork before moving to Olympus gear in June 2019.
Pro photographers tend to keep their gear for longer periods of time than do typical consumers. This really just comes down to business considerations and getting the most ROI from the camera equipment that they own.
Tom
Agreed, see my post above. Cheers!
The Olympus OM-D E-M1X ... is a fantastic camera... 👌🏻👍🏻💖💖 , I don't see that it has such worse differences with respect to the new Olympus - OM SYSTEM OM-1 ... , I even see , in my point of view , that the E-M1X still has some better features than the new OM-1 ... , such as ergonomics and grip... , the fact that it has a built-in field sensor and GPS as well I see it as a superior and more useful feature for me , and I have not had any problems with high ISO in low light photography either... 👌🏻👍🏻
Greetings
@@ridealongwithrandy 👌🏻👍🏻👍🏻
@@joanantonim.p.2400 Hi Joan, I have large hands and I absolutely love the comfort and handling of the E-M1X. I regularly shoot my E-m1X at ISO-6400 and have gone a bit higher on occasion. I've owned full frame, APS-C and Nikon 1 gear in the past. The E-M1X is the finest camera I've ever owned regardless of sensor size.
Tom
Thanks for the great input Thomas, and we are in the same conclusion that we need to weigh in business factor in decision making, cameras are costs to the business! You are right about clients being happy with results and not caring about system of choice, same for me too here!
Great video. A lot of what you say here makes sense and it is honestly how I operate when deciding to buy new equipment or not. I'm using a Mk II currently and thought about upgrading to the Mk III, 1X or the OM1... but I was hoping to get considerably better performance for my money before coming out of pocket. So far, I have found software solutions to my noise issues the best upgrade... I think I'll keep my camera for now.
I have seen in two tests that the OM 1 is no better than my E1 Mark III up to ISO 6400, which is why I am not buying the OM 1 either. I preferred to buy the Olympus 100-400. I have much more of it for my photography.
That’s a great choice! I’m also saving for the 100-400. Although some say it’s not super sharp at 400mm, just imagining all the cool stuff I can do with an AF super telephoto lens makes me smile.
@@siyuq5620 In good lighting conditions, the lens is of a great quality and at a very good price. I am happy. When I am on the road, then often only with the 12-100 and with the 100-400. That is all covered.
Exactly Michael, and I don't go higher than ISO3200 for 99% of my jobs.
@@robinwong Exactly, dear Robin. I do the same. Unless I'm shooting in handheld highres; then I can go up to ISO 6400. Everything beyond that is rather theoretical and of importance for pixel peepers.
The ISO performance of the OM-1 is actually quite fantastic. Side by side with an A7IV it's honestly not much worse, and the sensor speed is MUCH slower on the A7IV with a maximum fps of 10(but more like 6-7 if you're doing lossless). It's all about needs. OM-1 is aimed at wildlife photographers, which it definitely is better than the A7IV at with the exception of low light performance(but not by much).
Hey Robin, great video. I definitely agree with you regarding not needing to get the best and for most people the OM-1 is not something they will see a need to get it. But I definitely do think the OM-1 is better than those other cameras in that price range (R6 and A7IV) ONLY in terms of speed and in action photography. If you shoot street it definitely not something you'll see a benefit from. Great video.
Thank you Robin, for your advice.
Thanks and glad I can share
Recently, I finally splurged and got an Em1Mk2 renewed body to partner with my PenF. Wonderful! “Discounts” and business needs matter! I’m not a pro, and your logic seems sound to me. True story: about 55 years ago, I was having a coffee with my mother and I announced I was plunging into photography and truly passionate about the whole idea! Her response was, “thank goodness I hadn’t chosen race horses to invest in!” Lol! She was right, of course! Robin, your talents & skills are solid!
Thanks Jeff, and the E-M1 Mark II is still a great camera, I won't hesitate using it for jobs today.
Hi Robin! It'sso satisfying to be you! I totally agree with you! You are the most ethical person and professional person I know, honestly,, I enjoy see you and all your videos, your comments have the sense and sincerity we all need, I'm a Olympus user sin e 1974, I sad to know the new company doesn't keep you as an ambassador, still following you
Thanks Gustavo, appreciate the kind words and support. No worries about what happened, I am ok and I need to move on.
It’s unbelievable that OM Systems (or whatever they’re called) doesn’t keep Robin on, as he has been a consistent shill for MFT for years.
Your straight talking is so refreshing among the ‘visionary’ hype
This would be my dream camera if I were in the market for one. But in the meantime, I am more than happy with my EM-5 Mark III and EM-10 Mark III and Pen E-PL 7, which I use as backups. If you include film cameras, I already have too many and do not want to give in to GAS.
Excellent gear choice. E-M5 Mark III is my main UA-cam video camera, and my default street shooting camera too.
Thankfully I’m not the only one in the minority. I respect your honest review of the new features in the OM-1. I have felt the same way. I do not feel that the updates made to the OM-1 are enough for me to upgrade from my E-M1x. A great many of the features I have no use for in my landscape photography. I am perfectly happy with my E-M1x,
E-M1X is still a beast
Fair review I think. No one should be pressured any one into buying anything let alone something they don't need. Though I hope someone buys it. I just recently bought into the whole MFT thing. I appreciate that the products are very good for hiking and backpacking, which I do a lot of. I hope OMDS sell enough to continue making and improving the product.
Oh I am sure they will do fine. The OM-1 is in backorder everywhere in the world
Hi Robin, it’s not a matter of having a sufficient camera, we want want want
but my bank account says no
It's refreshing to see a working professional outlining the case for (or against) buying the latest gear. Too many people seem to assume that professionals just fart money every time they take a picture and that they will always have the latest gear. The truth has always been more nuanced, and may professionals make do with what works, rather than what is the shiniest/trendiest piece of equipment.
I've switched to Panasonic after nearly 30 years with Canon (the EOS 1 was my first Canon camera). I haven't done this because Panasonic is better, but because I needed to shoot more video for clients and Panasonic beat Canon on that score. It also worked out cheaper to make the switch than stay with Canon, so again and economic consideration.
Thanks for bringing this subject to the fore, well done.
Robin, great video as always. You remain my favorite reference in photography is the micro four thirds and I really appreciate your intellectual and professional honesty. Well done! I am a happy owner of the OM-1 which I believe to be very good but, as you say, it is definitely not WOW ;-) however it is a great camera.
Glad you have the OM-1 and do shoot more with it
For the work you do, I think any EM5.2 / f/1.8 combination would serve. The only downside would be the lack of 4K video and most of us still view the majority of content in 1080p. You’re right on all counts and far enough ahead of the game in terms of real needs to be future-proof for years to come.
Hi Robin! I'm so glad you put things in perspective and worded my very thoughts so well. As an Olympus and Sony user, I'm aware of the pros and cons of both systems, and I totally agree with what you said, if one were to spend all what the new OM1 costs, why not spend the same amount of money on a more capable, yet heavier, piece of equipment, with better performance in the iso and DR department, like a Sony a7iii, which I happen to have. I think M43 makers have, little by little, moved away from the initial advantage that that system used to offer compared to FF, and full frame cameras have been getting smaller and smaller, to a point that nowadays it's really hard to see a clear advantage of siding with M43 cameras. Let's see how much longer all this lasts. The OM1 might be a rebirth of M43, which I hope, or just the last gasps of air of an agonizing system. Only time will tell.
Full frame cameras are getting lighter but their lenses aren’t. Carry a few full frame lenses in a camera bag for a day and you’ll be knackered by the time you get home! 😬
Thanks Jose, I was hoping that OM-1 would be priced lower. Well, if their original bold claim of 2 stops better high ISO holds any water, then the price is justified for sure. But that's obviously not the case.
I somewhat knew beforehand what you would bring up - you are very consistent in this regard. And I agree with what you said. ;-)
I hope the consistency is a good thing
@@robinwong Yes, it is. At least in my opinion.
The reason I keep coming back to this channel, besides Robin's great energy, is that he's a straight shooter. I have no interest in getting the OM-1, but I enjoy seeing all the different perspectives on this new camera. I can't speak for the UK or Malaysia, but the US is a massive country, and while our popular UA-camrs from places like LA, NY, etc... may constantly be upgrading to the latest and greatest, I can assure you Robin, most people are not. Especially not right now. These new cameras cost as much as a month's rent is costing people in even low income areas today. Therefore, I think this video is very relevant right now to what's going on in the world.
Agreed, see my post above. Cheers!
thanks, I really do appreciate that. To add a bit more drama - the OM-1 costs more than my rent for one full year. I am not joking.
It's an honest personal view. Appreciate it. Greetings from Jakarta
Thanks, I think honesty is important
Wife purchased two em-1 mk iii recently… go figure
Your wife is very smart!
I partially agree, I sold my em1 markii and markiii with some lenses I never or hardly used and was able to get the OM-1 for just 450 euro! That in my opinion was a no brainer.
The new features on the OM-1 are very welcome and the subject ai works great for my style of shooting (mostly wildlife and BIF) I still have my EM1X but I am going to trade that in also for another OM-1 body when they will be in stock more regularly. So if you are able to get a good price for your old camera's than trading them in for the OM-1 is definitely worth considering.
I only buy what I need. I have nothing to trade for.
Another great and informative video Robin! New does not always mean better. All the best!
Thanks Victor, agreed
you are absolutely right Robin, greetings from Chile.
I fully agree with you, I own an EM1 MarkII and it's still an excellent camera. In fact much better than I photographer. Now I am the weakest link in the chain :D.
Don't be too hard on yourself, we are all improving the more we shoot
Thanks for this video! I am always thankful for those who talk sense instead of just praising the latest upgrades.
The OM-1 doesn't bring you more business, but it does even less to hobbyists like me. Of course I want hand held high-res and live ND, but other than that it would give me NOTHING over my E-M1 II, but for a HUGE price.
Well said Robin! If you don’t need it don’t buy it! If what you have is doing the job there is no need to buy a new camera just to have the latest kit! Sounds like a sound business decision to me!
Thanks Caitlin, appreciate it
I have an EM1 MKii ( OK, I also have a few other digital cameras but they are all old, obsolete if you believed the marketing jives ). It does whetever I want. I don't shoot birds, chickens, sparrows, nor do I need two dozen auto focus modes. I don't do video, I think EM1 MKII does 4K or something similar. I still use my EM5 MKii and I don't feel that I am missing on anything for what I am shooting. If sports, ' wildlife ' or ' fashion ' photography is your thing, then you might consider something like the OM System or the new Nikon Z9 monster, but there deep pockets are required.
I still use E-M1 Mark II alongside my E-M1 Mark III for jobs! The images and AF performance are identical to E-M1 Mark III
@@robinwong Thank you for that Robin. Good to know.
I hope that Robin will come to Japan, a paradise of camera.
What you say makes total sense to me, sound reasoning for your needs which you expressed very well. 👍🇬🇧
Thanks, I share what I can
If I was using S-AF and MF the majority of the time I wouldn't bother with an upgrade to an OM-1 either. For birds in flight though I think the ISO and tracking / focus upgrades will definitely bring increased productivity. In saying that - I'm happy with my Om-D E-M1 Mkii and simply working within its limitations for my bird photography.
As always, your videos are very objective and real, Robin. Thank you for all you do. Stay safe and healthy!
Take an OM-1 or EM10 markII or EM1 markII or EM5 Mark II. Make some good shots and use all bodies in the same situation or same image in the EVF. Ask people what photos correspond to what cameras. I am sure that the conclusion will be not the same for everybody. Technological evolution is made by litle steps. You should buy the latest camera if money is no issue or if there is a specific feature that is very important for your work. That's just my point of view... Thank you Robin for one more nice and honest video !
You make a very good point! In fact I have been playing with very old DSLR cameras lately and I am still very happy with what they can do
I really admire your intellectual honesty.
Thank you
Canon just shook up the camera world with the price points of the R7 and R10 here in Australia
I've been on the fence about the R7 because of it's amazing autofocus. I have a lumix G9 that I love everything about EXCEPT it's crappy autofocus! But if I get the R7 I'd have to invest in lenses where as if I got the OM-1 I'd have all of my awesome leica lenses. I know that the OM-1 has better autofocus than the G9 so that's kind of the way I'm leaning since I do a lot bird's in flight and military jet photography and the G9 just doesn't autofocus well on those. Decisions decisions... Lol
Perhaps 62 years experience in photography may give credibility to my perspective. I have used formats from the old Minox 8mm sub-miniature film (but more often, the Minolta 16mm sub-miniatures) through 8"x10" view cameras, and digital cameras from the first through my latest, but not THE latest, Sony A7R III with high resolution and focus stacking so that I often have several gigabytes' information in one final image.
I've used these primarily for photojournalism, including 15 years for major world publications around Asia, (Karachi>KL>Kuantan>Kalinga, Robin) but I've done just about everything in between. Vogue cover, weddings, the birth of children including my own, focus stacked looks into agates and fossils. One of my Micro 4/3 focus stacks was just mounted 16' x 9' on two walls of a new complex; it is spectacular. Wish I could include an image of it.
There is a visible difference in the technical quality, of course there is, but in any photography that counts as soul-food, the emotional impact is far, far more vital than how many pixels are involved.
The most important tool in your photography is your brain! Help it run smoothly, perception through execution and presentation, and you'll be far better along than the poor forum people worrying incessantly about a few grams or millimeters or pixels.
I have two OM-D E-M1 Mk IIIs, do not anticipate upgrading from them in Micro 4/3. I did get rid of an OM-D E-M1 Mk II, not because it had perceptibly lower performance, but because Olympus moved things around in the menu and camera controls. Fluency is key, Perception is King. Terimah kasi.
Yeah, I didn't get one as well. Moved to full frame :)
I upgraded from the E-M1 to the E-M1 mark ii because I thought the improvement in the sensor was enough to warrant the cost. Since then I have stayed with the mki ii. Lenses, lighting, backgrounds etc. are also important.
If you plan on staying with M43, the EM1X is a bargain.
Agreed, see my post above. Cheers!
Too big. My wrists/shoulders/neck/fingers/arms/back say no
I got an OM1 with 50mm f1.4, it feels pretty good when I take the photo.
Good points on earning power and providing value as a pro photographer vs enthusiast or hobbyist. I visited a camera store and the GH6 was in stock. I was more interested in the "old" em-1 mk3 and g9 for many reasons you stated. I'm not a professional and the OM1 or GH6 are not a big leap. The other brands have impressive gear but enough to make me switch not even close. I'll keep looking at what's going on and stay on the fence for now.
No rush to get anything new, and whatever you have, shoot more with them!
I've seen plenty of top notch photographers in 2021, healthy paid on stage, shooting with their 5Dmkll and 5Dmklll and being perfectly fine with their clients.
May be they just know how to take good pictures?
5D Mark II and 5D Mark III are excellent cameras!
This is what most business people call a "cost / benefit analysis". You definitely want the benefits gained from a purchase to justify the cost of making the purchase. As long as your current gear meets your needs, there's no reason to upgrade. Over the last year, I replaced my Nikon D800 and Sony AX100 cameras with a GH5M2 and now a GH6. I went this direction since 90% of my business is video, and I like the video options in the Lumix line. I expect to keep using these cameras for 10 years or more, regardless of what other cameras come out during that time. At some point, I may replace my DVX200 camcorder with another mirrorless, but for now, it makes a great C camera. In my work, the 5.7k video from the GH6 with a wide angle lens allows me to do enough post-process cropping to make a locked-off camera work like a 2nd camera operator, and that alone justified the purchase.
Ohhhhh if I am doing video stuff the GH6 is at the top of my list!
Hi Robin. Just subbed. I have an old OM1 film camera. Well an OM1N.🤣😅😂 A lot cheaper. Cannot afford the new top tier digital stuff but I love the OMD EM10II, which was the most gorgeous little camera I had ever seen. It rekindled my liking for the brand. I'm just getting a nice version of a secondhand OMD EM1 first version. That's affordable to me now! At last!🤣🍺👍
I agree with you. Therefore with the cost and my interest in portrait photography I have switched to Nikon Z7ii instead of upgrading my em1 mkII; it is a high investment but I really want more resolutions for cropping photos. I am not going to ditch my Olympus OM system as I do take avian shots occasionally and with my Leica 100400 I can get amazing photos. Anyhow first time I am doing my comment and a pat on the back to you. PS. Just bought you a coffee also. Cheers!
Robin u are right. I think the OM system is supreme but the pricey OM1 is far too expensive even to recover the wedding cost.
Yeah, the camera is great and all, I just wish they lower the asking price.
Hi Robin, I understand fully what you said and agree! Also, I would recommend not wasting your time with people that are critical, it is not worth it and you are a fantastic person! I can only recommend you focus on creation of beautiful pictures, your art, your business and cut off the negative people around you, you are not bound to communicate with people if you do not wish to! Keep up the fantastic work friend! :)
Wonderfully honest. I needed a reliable view of the new sensors high iso performance. (MFT will be great in 10 years.) After this video I will not upgrade from my em1 ii. I am now planning to keep my EM-1 and jump to Fuji APSC H2 next year when this camera appears. Many thanks.
I totally agree. I rather invest my money to buy prime lens and pro lens unless my old olympus camera body breaks down.
Getting lenses allow you to do more.
You are absolutely correct. Just because you are a professional photographer doesn’t mean you have to buy every new whiz bang camera that comes out. I don’t use half the features on my camera.I don’t do video and I don’t need 12fps or super fast focusing in my style of photography. I totally agree with you.
Good job, Robin!
Thanks
Totally agree. I am a pro snapper in the UK. My E M1 MkII is still going strong, I have now had 3 of them! I will keep this one and add the MkIII soon. The MkIII is of course now discontinued, but for me it will do what I want, cost me less and give great results.