The Wagoneer is safest because you'll spend most of the time in your local Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep service department waiting room. Can't get in an accident if it ain't on the road.
Your emotional attachment to how distorted the vehicle looks after the accident doesn't matter in results. What matters is the injry reports to the occupant dummies. That's how these tests are analyzed, not which one visually looks more damaged.
@@chasefretwell1384 the wagoneer in my opinion was the worst out of the overlap and it got a good. The Tahoe got a poor but the expedition didn’t have curtain bags deploy. It’s all a scam if you ask me.
Imagine having your SAT test questions years ahead of time and STILL getting a “Marginal” or “Poor” score. Pathetic. And they’re asking how much for them? Fail.
You make a valid point. But these automakers are up against huge demands from the governments… they’re making everything lighter/cheaper to appease fuel economy demands.
@@jayd8547 I mean no disrespect, but I’d bet my maximum wager ($5) that I’m older than you. I say that only because I’ve enough and long enough to know that the automakers own the regulators. And the ONLY people who large corporations appease are who? The shareholders. Now and forever. Amen. The variable is the profit margin which is designed to appease who? The IIHS and the consumer? Or the shareholders?
The Expedition should have got a poor rating considering the steering wheel hit the dummy in the chest because it wasn't strong enough at the A- pillar. That's scary how much of the body came into the drivers area.
It also twisted the dummies head like a ninja snapping a neck. Ford was by far the worst. I worked at a junk uard for a while. By far the most common wreck involved the the driver front corner, one way or another. Ford is junk.
@@jimmyf1312 The Jeep Wagoneer is a full sized SUV and these are about a foot or two shorter as very large "mid-sized SUVs" but absolutely I can compare the safety and say you're way more likely to die in that.
The Chevrolet Tahoe seems to me to be the safest of the group and the Ford the most unsafe since it bends completely and the driver would be seriously injured. I don't think the ratings are fair!!!!
It's less safe, but it might help if you're in a frontal crash and then another vehicle hits your side and then the side airbags can deploy for that secondary crash.
IIHS receives it's funding from the insurance industry. GM owns 60% of the market share for full size SUV's. Ford nets 19% and Jeep/Stellantis gets a bit over 8%. The findings here help support insurance premium and policy revenue. It's not hard to see make the connection with the most popular vehicles in class being designated with higher insurance rates. Its a win win for the insurance industry.
I wish the IIHS tested these SUVs 6 or 12 months earlier. That would have given GM & Ford time to improve the Tahoe, Suburban, Yukon, Escalade, Expedition, & Navigator which have received many other updates for 2025 models.
On a conceptual basis it makes sense; the platform that is separated from itself would make sense to be less safe compared to one where the frame and safety cage are all one unit. The amount of body on frame vehicles that are Top Safety picks is much smaller than unibodies.
I'm failing to understand how the Tahoe was rated as poor for front impact, but the Wagoneer was rated as good? Tahoe seems to have faired that impact better or at the very least the same as the Wagoneer. WTF?
@harrycolonicjr.2397 yeah, and the expeditions steering wheel slammed into the dummy. No thanks, I'll take the tahoe any day. They didn't even show the damage on the tahoe either, this almost seems biased
The soundtrack sounds a lot like Terminator 2. I guess thermonuclear annihilation and wrecking your $80,000 Tahoe have similar doom and gloom implications 😂
Imagine being a dummy not knowing today will be filled with multiple injuries and near death experiences. He never even flinched as he approached the barrier.
Misconception of the century. I wil admit that as a teenager I do sometimes prefer SUV > sedan and often times the SUV IS better looking (case in point X5 vs 5series, CRV vs. Accord, just opinions here) but the safety compromises are not it
Ratings do not apply across vehicle classes. The results are respective to their class. A sub compact car that gets all “great” ratings is likely far less safe than a full size suv that gets “poor” ratings.
It's actually about impact forces to the dummy. Sometimes a vehicle that crumples up more absorbs some of the crash forces that normally the human would have felt.
Bro the editor clearly hates the Tahoe which was the clear winner of the front impact test which he edited right there then kept the poor raring it took for the lighting test ! 😂 the Chevy is the safety winner but the editor just cant handle it 😂
@@dierreprice1940based off watching the video or data off the sensors and dummies? These go through an entire post analysis, not cheap to run these tests and a lot of people look to them for accurate data.
Was it the one testing backseat occupant protection, if so get over it. Btw go do research on the Updated moderate overlap crash test to see how they rate the results.
Thanks Mary barra for making expensive trucks and pocketing the profits. And using cheap parts. Owner of multiple silverado trucks over the years. Quality has decreased 😂
Pretty bad on all accounts that car companies don't prioritize safety in 2024. Just go watch Volvo in the same tests and you will realize there is huge room for improvement.
It's really disturbing to see how low the impact point is on their crash cart. The center of gravity for it should be on par with an F-150 or higher to see how badly these do. It concerns me that the lack of variety in testing methods beyond direction and speed is causing manufacturers to focus on reinforcements to pass a given test when it may not be representative of what other vehicles on the road are. Also, with the weight of EVs being significantly more than their ICE counterparts, the testing ideology becomes even more limited.
Not sure how any headlights could be considered poor these days, all of them are blinding at night when you meet them. We don't need to see a raccoon 2 miles away! Dimmer headlights would probably cause less accidents!
You should also test worn vehicles, vehicles that are older than the year they were made. As the steel and such should be aged and weathered from use. See how it holds up.
looks like the Ford (oldest design) needs a redesign. Most newer vehicles fail the updated moderate overlap test due to rear occupant dummies flailing all over the place. Youd think headlights should be a federal standard for effect
Ok I don't like Ford because in my opinion they are building very unreliable cars now but it looks like it barely got a 15% overlap instead of the 20% so I'm wondering if it didn't get a fair shake in this test
We all agree safety and improvements are great steps forward, but this company is continuously full of crap. This company will only be satisfied when civilians are driving tanks with airbags down the road. Every time manufacturers meet this companies demands, they continue to invent new tests and find faults of perfectly safe vehicles. What the heck did they do in the 70s and 80s, just not drive? And yet somehow those kids survived. As observed and since the company has been established their "ratings" really don't add up to even their own approach. Brand loyalty is a thing
The ratings don't make sense, the Expedition has very poor safety levels since the door opens and it is worse for the driver and it doesn't have to be marginal. The Tahoe has better safety levels, it has more airbags and "the door doesn't open"... and finally the Jeep is the safest since it doesn't leave Chrysler's services 👌🏻
Ford markets the door flying off as a safety feature. If the car is on fire it's easy to get out quickly! Well except for your legs being pinned to the dashboard, but let's not focus on the negatives....
Creo que estás pruebas salen sobrando porque en la realidad estos vehículos no importa en que posición sea el impacto se hacen añicos y en su mayoría ya no hay forma de arreglarlos como estaban originalmente porque lamentablemente los materiales de estos autos son plástico y aluminio. En mi punto de vista las compañías usan estos materiales porque les sale más barato la producción. pero para el consumidor tiene que estar desembolsando cantidades elevadas de dinero en autos fabricados con plástico y aluminio y con rendimiento de vida no muy larga lamentablemente 😢
@@xo8033 oOh, man! That really is terrible. I hate to hear that. I was unaware of this decline in Ford quality that badly. I suppose Ford was a much better product 20 years ago. I know my 7.3L diesel is good for nearly 500,000 miles or more according to other owners who really used theirs. Hopefully, with only 38K miles on mine, it will last another 20+ years if I keep in the garage. I get offers of 25K every week here in rural areas. Never selling! We had a huge, Texas hail storm last week and I left it out and forgot! Quarter-sizrd hail. Not a single scratch or ding anywhere! The 2001-2011 Crown Vic's, Marquis', and Town Cars are bulletproof. Such a shame that prices have skyrocketed and value for the dollar way down. Older Explorers were great too, from 1998 - 2004. I see the new ones falling apart. Ford better clean up it's act.
OMG cars meet crash standards and theyre a 1/3 the size of these crapboxes...theses things are just a way for automaker to cash in, stupid people buy these and think theyre "safe", as you can see from the tests theyre not...
Have you ever seen a unibody car get ripped in fucking half slinging the rear occupants out of the car? I have which is why I spent the money to have a body on frame suv so my children are safer in that situation.
@Maverick09171 to be honest, if we wish to talk about safety, driving is a gamble on your life big small all it takes is for someone who isn't paying attention or doesn't care to pay attention or is just outright an ass on the road and doesn't have any business being on the road
Me parece que esta al revés el informe, ford y chevrolet sufren menores deformaciones y las estructuras se mantienen estables después de la colision no así la marca jeep que es desastroso!
Not true, many American cars have the highest safety rating available. Large cars can be dangerous to small cars, but not many of us drive small cars so it's all good. As for people, it's advisable to look both ways when crossing the road like our mothers taught us at age 3. New cars have sensors to help warn us of the people who don't listen to Mom🙂. Kidding aside, the type of impact show here is not really something cars will endure in normal driving. Power or phone poles are designed to break away when a car hits them and road barriers generally have crumple zones built on the ends of them to absorb impacts if someone hits them at the end. Hitting other cars has them both giving way and the high level of damage is what is supposed to happen as the vehicle absorbs the energy of the crash. The Expedition is the exception as it deflected too much. This should be addressed by the manufacturer but is again not something likely to occur in real driving scenarios. There were a lot of discussions when they changed the testing to use these offset barriers as they do not mimic crashes that actually happen.
The Wagoneer is safest because you'll spend most of the time in your local Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep service department waiting room. Can't get in an accident if it ain't on the road.
Underrated comment
@@iluvcamaros1912 lmboooo yooooo.. u need a time not Bru..🤣😂🤣😂
Compared to most modern cars Wagoneers are pretty reliable
Zero issues and going strong.
🤣👀 24hr in, catastrophic engine failure. Buy back underway...lol..
How was the Tahoe poor but when the ford expeditions door gets ripped off it’s marginal
Your emotional attachment to how distorted the vehicle looks after the accident doesn't matter in results. What matters is the injry reports to the occupant dummies. That's how these tests are analyzed, not which one visually looks more damaged.
@@chasefretwell1384 the wagoneer in my opinion was the worst out of the overlap and it got a good. The Tahoe got a poor but the expedition didn’t have curtain bags deploy. It’s all a scam if you ask me.
Imagine having your SAT test questions years ahead of time and STILL getting a “Marginal” or “Poor” score. Pathetic. And they’re asking how much for them? Fail.
It’s not often the IIHS test large suvs, they tested a rivian and Audi this year. It exposed the automakers who were neglecting the tests in directly
And the fact that these are the shorter wheelbase models. That’s crazy
You make a valid point. But these automakers are up against huge demands from the governments… they’re making everything lighter/cheaper to appease fuel economy demands.
@@jayd8547 I mean no disrespect, but I’d bet my maximum wager ($5) that I’m older than you. I say that only because I’ve enough and long enough to know that the automakers own the regulators. And the ONLY people who large corporations appease are who? The shareholders. Now and forever. Amen. The variable is the profit margin which is designed to appease who? The IIHS and the consumer? Or the shareholders?
@FrctvtcGrgtvtcrg shorter wheel base ? This things are lorries in most countries to big and longer than most standard vehicles
Ratings didn't stack up with the actual impact. How is the Expedition marginal in the small overlap? That was an outright fail.
I completely agree. It sous have gotten a poor rating for that spectacle. I'd rather not have the steering wheel slam into my chest thanks! Lol
Yeah right, the dash split in half and there is sheared metal in your face
Maybe IIHS knows better?
Forces applied to occupants is where the rating come from.
Impact intrusion in the driver's foot area would cause a major downgrade.
The Expedition should have got a poor rating considering the steering wheel hit the dummy in the chest because it wasn't strong enough at the A- pillar. That's scary how much of the body came into the drivers area.
Well, it was a dummy driving, you shouldn't expect great results.
It also twisted the dummies head like a ninja snapping a neck. Ford was by far the worst. I worked at a junk uard for a while. By far the most common wreck involved the the driver front corner, one way or another. Ford is junk.
Impressed by the better safety of the Jeep Wagoneer
JEEP BOT DETECTED
It's kinda garbage vs a Rivian or a Volvo
@@SuperMrgentlemandifferent vehicle class all together so you can’t really compare them
@@jimmyf1312 The Jeep Wagoneer is a full sized SUV and these are about a foot or two shorter as very large "mid-sized SUVs" but absolutely I can compare the safety and say you're way more likely to die in that.
It is not related to sales!! People buy based off of looks
How in the world is the Expedition not poor for the overlap test the dash came loose stricking the driver
$$$$$
I'm sorry you guys were paid by Ford to change/update the rating. It clearly showed the Fords steering wheel smashing into the driver...
@@mcneel16 Yea it’s who puts in the highest bid gets the highest rating .
The Chevrolet Tahoe seems to me to be the safest of the group and the Ford the most unsafe since it bends completely and the driver would be seriously injured. I don't think the ratings are fair!!!!
The GM is way behind the Wagoneer. Floor folding up, frame separating from cab
Expedition, no side airbags during overlap ?????
@@minipandora22 wasn’t a side impact.
@@bigbubba357m frontal side impact , airbag should deploy to control head 👤movement
It's less safe, but it might help if you're in a frontal crash and then another vehicle hits your side and then the side airbags can deploy for that secondary crash.
IIHS receives it's funding from the insurance industry. GM owns 60% of the market share for full size SUV's. Ford nets 19% and Jeep/Stellantis gets a bit over 8%. The findings here help support insurance premium and policy revenue. It's not hard to see make the connection with the most popular vehicles in class being designated with higher insurance rates. Its a win win for the insurance industry.
I wish the IIHS tested these SUVs 6 or 12 months earlier. That would have given GM & Ford time to improve the Tahoe, Suburban, Yukon, Escalade, Expedition, & Navigator which have received many other updates for 2025 models.
Ford expedition ☠️
Background music is relaxing and good car crash it’s like science fiction thriller movie type
I wonder if it’s more difficult to create a safe crash worthy body on frame vehicle vs a unibody vehicle.
On a conceptual basis it makes sense; the platform that is separated from itself would make sense to be less safe compared to one where the frame and safety cage are all one unit. The amount of body on frame vehicles that are Top Safety picks is much smaller than unibodies.
Unibodies are extremely expensive to repair, I imagine…
@@VV-if7ye they are, which is why they are almost always totaled in accidents.
Jeep Wagoneer 👍
I'm failing to understand how the Tahoe was rated as poor for front impact, but the Wagoneer was rated as good? Tahoe seems to have faired that impact better or at the very least the same as the Wagoneer. WTF?
That's what I was thinking too
What matters are the loads on the dummy
Tahoe better
Wagoneer is a fiat
@harrycolonicjr.2397 yeah, and the expeditions steering wheel slammed into the dummy. No thanks, I'll take the tahoe any day. They didn't even show the damage on the tahoe either, this almost seems biased
The Expedition and Tahoe have gotten facelifts, but they really haven't improved their crash structures in years. And these test results bear that out
The soundtrack sounds a lot like Terminator 2.
I guess thermonuclear annihilation and wrecking your $80,000 Tahoe have similar doom and gloom implications 😂
As a body man with over 40 years in the business, watching these crashes just drive me crazy. I realize it's necessary, but.
Imagine being a dummy not knowing today will be filled with multiple injuries and near death experiences. He never even flinched as he approached the barrier.
The dummies are better drivers than some of the ones I've seen out on the roadways too!
"I got an SUV because it's safer."
Misconception of the century. I wil admit that as a teenager I do sometimes prefer SUV > sedan and often times the SUV IS better looking (case in point X5 vs 5series, CRV vs. Accord, just opinions here) but the safety compromises are not it
Lol. No kidding!
@@trevorshark16 it’s still safer
@@Alwayswatchingyou-pc9fe Safer to roll over?
Ratings do not apply across vehicle classes. The results are respective to their class.
A sub compact car that gets all “great” ratings is likely far less safe than a full size suv that gets “poor” ratings.
Chevy guys see how poorly it did. "It's rigged! Chevy's the best!"
Chevy does well in another test by the same group. "Great test! Chevy's the best!.
It's amazing how much plastic is in these vehicles. Those things should get 50 mpg.
Did the ford passenger airbag deploy?
If nobody was sitting in that seat, it shouldn't have.
Now why would yall do Tahoe like that 😂the expedition did the worst!
It's actually about impact forces to the dummy. Sometimes a vehicle that crumples up more absorbs some of the crash forces that normally the human would have felt.
That's a lot of money, 3 vehicles, possibly 4 tests each, at 80k per vehicle ... damn near $1M just in vehicles
What’s with the creepy music?
Where the Gmc Yukon?
It's a Chevy
chevy tahoe represents the gmc yukon and Cadillac escalade. the ford expedition also represents the lincoln navigator
Bro the editor clearly hates the Tahoe which was the clear winner of the front impact test which he edited right there then kept the poor raring it took for the lighting test ! 😂 the Chevy is the safety winner but the editor just cant handle it 😂
That’s absolutely not how these tests go and your statement is extremely ignorant and ridiculous sounding because you like chevy.
I was thinking the same thing because the Tahoe is better than all of them after they crashed
@@dierreprice1940based off watching the video or data off the sensors and dummies? These go through an entire post analysis, not cheap to run these tests and a lot of people look to them for accurate data.
the description says it all. Also if you saw the back seat, the seatbelt went below the dummy which can cause injuries to internal organs.
Was it the one testing backseat occupant protection, if so get over it. Btw go do research on the Updated moderate overlap crash test to see how they rate the results.
Someone needs to bring back bumper struts.They're an awesome idea
Thanks Mary barra for making expensive trucks and pocketing the profits. And using cheap parts. Owner of multiple silverado trucks over the years. Quality has decreased 😂
Chevrolet Tahoe is the best in this challenge.🤗
Agree
Agree
No, the Tahoe didn’t absorb the impact well
Lol
No it's not
Pretty bad on all accounts that car companies don't prioritize safety in 2024. Just go watch Volvo in the same tests and you will realize there is huge room for improvement.
Why would I buy one of these if I could an x3/5, Eqe, Tiguan/ Tourag or whatever???
I never believe any of these tests. There's always money involved somewhere, but i do enjoy watching the crashes
It's really disturbing to see how low the impact point is on their crash cart. The center of gravity for it should be on par with an F-150 or higher to see how badly these do. It concerns me that the lack of variety in testing methods beyond direction and speed is causing manufacturers to focus on reinforcements to pass a given test when it may not be representative of what other vehicles on the road are. Also, with the weight of EVs being significantly more than their ICE counterparts, the testing ideology becomes even more limited.
It’s 2024 … how in the heck with today’s technology can a vehicle have poor headlights? Come on Chevy
2025’s are getting new headlights
Who cares about headlights?
Everyone cars about headlights until they have to replace them
Pedestrians at night @@clevelandrocksdzd
@@clevelandrocksdzd other drivers. I can't see these trucks at night, let alone the road because of the glare and brightness of them
Stellantis must've paid money to these people.
Not sure how any headlights could be considered poor these days, all of them are blinding at night when you meet them.
We don't need to see a raccoon 2 miles away! Dimmer headlights would probably cause less accidents!
Why did the Ford Expedition at 2 min, 40 seconds perform som much better than the Ford Expedition at 4 min, 45 seconds?
Wagoneer all the way
To the dealer for warranty repairs? Absolutely.
You should also test worn vehicles, vehicles that are older than the year they were made. As the steel and such should be aged and weathered from use. See how it holds up.
Would be nice if they specified the speeds as well
looks like the Ford (oldest design) needs a redesign. Most newer vehicles fail the updated moderate overlap test due to rear occupant dummies flailing all over the place. Youd think headlights should be a federal standard for effect
Jeep Wagoneer wins!!!
@@DanielBeard-bt7mn Unfortunately it is one ugly vehicle
To be honest the Wagoneer is a very nice car and the crash test for it was painful to watch.
Ok I don't like Ford because in my opinion they are building very unreliable cars now but it looks like it barely got a 15% overlap instead of the 20% so I'm wondering if it didn't get a fair shake in this test
Wagoneer did the best
Captain obvious has entered the chat
Ah so dodge put in the highest bid so they get the highest rating .😂
For the prices you have to pay for these large SUV's competing with EU SUV's you would hope you get the same safety performance.
I think it’s a joke every crash isn’t an offset crash.do one with a tractor trailer doing 55mph head on with these trucks
It depends on how much they are paying
Poor Cars. 😭
That’s not areal test every crash is not offset.do a head on test with a tractor trailer doing 65 mph.
Jeep is KING 🤴
تاهو و اكسبيديشن 😮
GMC 👍🏼
At least all three do a great job absorbing the impact, because the reliability in all three is rated negative five stars ⭐️ still they are junk 😂😂😂
We all agree safety and improvements are great steps forward, but this company is continuously full of crap. This company will only be satisfied when civilians are driving tanks with airbags down the road. Every time manufacturers meet this companies demands, they continue to invent new tests and find faults of perfectly safe vehicles. What the heck did they do in the 70s and 80s, just not drive? And yet somehow those kids survived.
As observed and since the company has been established their "ratings" really don't add up to even their own approach. Brand loyalty is a thing
Bro how much did fiat pay you?
The ratings don't make sense, the Expedition has very poor safety levels since the door opens and it is worse for the driver and it doesn't have to be marginal. The Tahoe has better safety levels, it has more airbags and "the door doesn't open"... and finally the Jeep is the safest since it doesn't leave Chrysler's services 👌🏻
Ford markets the door flying off as a safety feature. If the car is on fire it's easy to get out quickly! Well except for your legs being pinned to the dashboard, but let's not focus on the negatives....
@@mikelemoine4267 Instead of taking care of your brand and defending it, be realistic...
Why cant manufactures make cars with a strong frame made from iron, steel, metal or something stronger than this crap
Dam shame how much plastic is in the front end of vehicles
bigger isn’t safer i fear
Expedition 🤢🤮👎 !!! il futuro parlera'
Wow
Creo que estás pruebas salen sobrando porque en la realidad estos vehículos no importa en que posición sea el impacto se hacen añicos y en su mayoría ya no hay forma de arreglarlos como estaban originalmente porque lamentablemente los materiales de estos autos son plástico y aluminio. En mi punto de vista las compañías usan estos materiales porque les sale más barato la producción. pero para el consumidor tiene que estar desembolsando cantidades elevadas de dinero en autos fabricados con plástico y aluminio y con rendimiento de vida no muy larga lamentablemente 😢
Looks like the chevy did the worst
Bien madreadas la neta
قمة الفشل
احد يعرف احد يوظفني عنده تكفون تكسب أجر
Chevy the safest because it's always broke down 😅
Worst SUVs ever
The one thing I see most with all of these as all the sharp plastic projectiles flying through the air😢
Being a Ford guy, I would take my chances in the Ford Expedition, being the best-styled and highest resale value vehicle shown.
the new expeditions quality sucks (like most manufacturers) my dad bought a 2023 last year and it was in the shop for 5 of the 6 months he had it
@@xo8033 oOh, man! That really is terrible. I hate to hear that. I was unaware of this decline in Ford quality that badly. I suppose Ford was a much better product 20 years ago. I know my 7.3L diesel is good for nearly 500,000 miles or more according to other owners who really used theirs. Hopefully, with only 38K miles on mine, it will last another 20+ years if I keep in the garage. I get offers of 25K every week here in rural areas. Never selling! We had a huge, Texas hail storm last week and I left it out and forgot! Quarter-sizrd hail. Not a single scratch or ding anywhere!
The 2001-2011 Crown Vic's, Marquis', and Town Cars are bulletproof. Such a shame that prices have skyrocketed and value for the dollar way down.
Older Explorers were great too, from 1998 - 2004. I see the new ones falling apart. Ford better clean up it's act.
Expedition is the lowest resale of the category . You have initial lease then second hand Uber SUV fleet vehicle no one touched them after that
Styling and resale value don't help much in a crash.
Typical Ford fan lol. The Ford and Chevy are extremely outdated they're still using old chassis
OMG cars meet crash standards and theyre a 1/3 the size of these crapboxes...theses things are just a way for automaker to cash in, stupid people buy these and think theyre "safe", as you can see from the tests theyre not...
Have you ever seen a unibody car get ripped in fucking half slinging the rear occupants out of the car? I have which is why I spent the money to have a body on frame suv so my children are safer in that situation.
So a smaller vehicle is safer to you
That’s not how it works
@Maverick09171 to be honest, if we wish to talk about safety, driving is a gamble on your life big small all it takes is for someone who isn't paying attention or doesn't care to pay attention or is just outright an ass on the road and doesn't have any business being on the road
@@fireflyraven2760 agreed. But I’m not sure what that has to do with the OP comment.
American car all🇺🇸
Or it could be that the wagoneer IS safer😮😊
i don’t rlly care about the pedestrian safety tbh
Me parece que esta al revés el informe, ford y chevrolet sufren menores deformaciones y las estructuras se mantienen estables después de la colision no así la marca jeep que es desastroso!
they usually focus more on the back seat as of now, also it's not the structure but the footwell that is the problem
Parece todo has visto al revés... Jajajaja.
American cars has always been crap snd dangerous for both drivers, other cars or people
Not true, many American cars have the highest safety rating available. Large cars can be dangerous to small cars, but not many of us drive small cars so it's all good. As for people, it's advisable to look both ways when crossing the road like our mothers taught us at age 3. New cars have sensors to help warn us of the people who don't listen to Mom🙂. Kidding aside, the type of impact show here is not really something cars will endure in normal driving. Power or phone poles are designed to break away when a car hits them and road barriers generally have crumple zones built on the ends of them to absorb impacts if someone hits them at the end. Hitting other cars has them both giving way and the high level of damage is what is supposed to happen as the vehicle absorbs the energy of the crash. The Expedition is the exception as it deflected too much. This should be addressed by the manufacturer but is again not something likely to occur in real driving scenarios. There were a lot of discussions when they changed the testing to use these offset barriers as they do not mimic crashes that actually happen.