These videos are great. This video especially allowed me to understand the essay more fully and helped in the essay I’m currently writing :))) keep on w it
Thanks! I understand better now if i read the author function by Foucault and the death of author by Barthe. I happy to find your video of these two essay of author function. They are not so easy essays.
Soz, too fast, too complicated, far too many references before defining the basic premises of Foucault's theory in a simple straightforward manner. But perhaps I need to find something more elementary.
I think that Butler is almost totally redundant of Foucault, yes. I thin she became super famous within the academy more for the "political relevance" of her ideas than for their originality. Meanwhile, truly original thinkers like Ted Kaczynski or David Icke remain ignored by the academy because their ideas run counter to the ideology dominant in the industry.
Absolutely brilliant video mate. One of the best literary criticism vids I've seen on here. Crystal clear.
Thanks a lot and thanks for watching! :D
This is helpful. I was struggling with Foucault.
These videos are great. This video especially allowed me to understand the essay more fully and helped in the essay I’m currently writing :))) keep on w it
Thanks a lot for watching!
And good luck with the essay- sure it will be awesome.
Thanks! I understand better now if i read the author function by Foucault and the death of author by Barthe. I happy to find your video of these two essay of author function. They are not so easy essays.
Great explanation, but it ends so suddenly i feel i missed out on something! But really great work!
This helped so much with my essay!! Shame I cannot reference you 😭
Agree!It’s indeed helpful 😊
You are the author dude
I used to think I was totally unique in one respect, but now I see that at least one other person read Ward Churchill’s book.
Haha I was wondering when someone would notice that. Thanks for the comment
If everything is relative there's no need for this video. It says nothing and that is 100% aligned with my 'gutfeelings'.
greay job!
Soz, too fast, too complicated, far too many references before defining the basic premises of Foucault's theory in a simple straightforward manner. But perhaps I need to find something more elementary.
Do you feel like Judith a Butler is just a total reapproporiation of Foucault?
I think that Butler is almost totally redundant of Foucault, yes. I thin she became super famous within the academy more for the "political relevance" of her ideas than for their originality. Meanwhile, truly original thinkers like Ted Kaczynski or David Icke remain ignored by the academy because their ideas run counter to the ideology dominant in the industry.
@@chadahaagphilosophychannel7329 Is that a joke? What happened to you?
@@chadahaagphilosophychannel7329 what an idiotic analysis.
@@gannonapoliticalteen9694 that's Chad analysis You virgin!
piErRe dUpOn
hOMEr