"Oh, give me a locus where the gravitons focus Where the three-body problem is solved, Where the microwaves play down at three degrees K, And the cold virus never evolved Oh Home, home on LaGrange, Where the space debris always collects, We possess so it seems, two of Man’s greatest dreams: Solar power and zero-gee sex
Zero-G sex would be interesting...and more likely problematic. On Earth, gravity takes care of the momentum problem. But without it, every movement sends you spinning and/or coasting off somewhere. I guess that's what we will use padded rooms for.
@@sab1751 from the Black Pants Legion's song writer. Check out Tex talks battletech and it will come up. I could spend hours listening to that beautiful voice smooth as lunar regolith and as sweet as the dead sea.
I have actually have a fridge(that is larger than the one in my kitchen mind you) for drinks and snacks right next to my desk. Just gotta roll the chair to the side a bit!
Electromagnetic currents connect the Sun's magnetic field to the Earth and to the other planets. Every star connects to the center of every galaxy and the center of each galaxy connects into the plasma fields that your avi so wonderfully depicts. Plasma in space acts as a superconductor. The universe is electromagnetically connected. The awakening into an electromagnetic universe feels like a religious experience.
Intelligence is like a blade: it is neutral. Only based on the motivation to use it determines good or evil. Intelligence with malice is self-serving and wreaks destruction. Conversely, intelligence driven by benevolence can serve mankind and beyond.
22:30 reminded me of an anecdote on the building of Brasilia, Brazil: there used to be an industrial size concrete-mixer that would mix concrete non-stop (yes, 24/7) until it broke & had to be replaced. the calculations showed that it was less expensive to buy a new concrete-mixer ever 30 days than turn it off for maintenance. so I can easily see companies shipping these kinds of robots to the Moon periodically & using them until it stops working (or its marginal production falls too low) & needs to be replaced.
So we are currently living inland on the plains, with some very minor settlements on the coast. We still tend to build the ships and truck them to the sea before setting sail Very close to the coast. But once we start settling fully the coasts and harbors, getting out to sea and the wider ocean becomes so much easier. Most of Human civilzation resides close to or on the coasts. I would expect space to fairly similar.
Thanks, Isaac for making these kinds of videos, really cool to see other people thinking about this kind of stuff. I don't get talk to people about these topics in everyday life, but every video is like a cool discussion on the future. Bonus points for helping broaden the imagination of what could be achieved for many people watching you for the first time. You never know who your videos could set on a path. Great work, keep it up!
@@isaacarthurSFIA Thanks for the video! The exhaust plume rising as the rocket passes at about 0:23 seems wrong. Wouldn't the exhaust plume be pushed downwards? Is there ever a situation - like in outer space, when a rocket is moving super fast - where a rocket's exhaust plume ends up moving in the same direction as the rocket, and still acts to increase the rocket's speed?
@@FLPhotoCatcher If the rocket is moving faster than the exhaust velocity, the net movement of the exhaust will be forward. The momentum transfer still happens because the exhaust is still travelling backwards with respect to the rocket.
@@cf453 That makes sense. It does seem strange that if a rocket zooms past, and its exhaust is moving in the same direction, that the exhaust could be providing additional speed to the rocket.
AmsterdamHeavy I think they both serve important but different purposes. Mars is the best option for a large colony (and large I mean millions) to be our second home, while the lunar space is better for mining, launches and orbital construction facilities.
I believe we are already an actual spacefaring civilization. Hell men have walked on the moon!! Men live in low orbit for months at a time. Mars is a fine place to colonize. So is the Moon. I think both should be colonized. If Stellaris has taught me anything its this... we need as many colonies and populations as we can get and as fast as we can get them.
@@AmsterdamHeavy Do you seriously think they are lying about the moon landing and space shuttles? Or do you mean to say that those achievements are meaningless? Either way I think you are wrong. There is evidence of those worthwhile achievements.
@@roblaquiere8220 No, the space shuttle was just very unsafe and hillariously expensive for somethign "reuseable". An upgraded Saturn 5 with 4 decades of experience in it would probably have beaten it hands down in every way possible. Cost. Power. Safety. So would have a shuttle 2.0, not engineered with too many ideas in mind while designing. The F9 is really the first modern rocket since the Saturn....everything else was just regugitation....expensive regurgitation. More boosters. More cost. More unsafe bodges. More hypergolics (looking at the russians here). More recycled 60s designs....
Isaac, your videos are some of the few that I can endure watching at normal speed (instead of 1.5 or 1.75 for the really slow speakers) because it gives me more time to enjoy the ideas you share with us. Love your content, keep it up please.
Step 1: we colonize the moon. Step 2: then colonize Lagrange points. Step 3: ? Step 4: make mobile suits. Step 5: make Gundam IRL, we may need to drop a colony on australia to do this but that is a cost I'm willing to pay.
@@bluemmmy I mean you are right, even in the Gundam series the Zeon Colony drop could not defeat all of australia. So the Kangaroos will be able to hold out.
@@bluemmmy Screw the kangaroo - fear the Emu, they won an actual declared war against the Australian Army. No vehicles, no firearms, hell not even any opposable thumbs, and they beat a modern infantry that had declared a war of genocide on them.
@@michaelggriffiths your comment doesn´t have any sense... your entire comment is summarized in the word "wisdom" of the sentence... Are you sure is Asimov who failed to understand...? Is a very simple sentence...
Says the guy who wrote about building an oligarchy and a hive society and made Golan choose anything but free will.... I love Asimov, but I would've done anything, anything, to choose something other than equality with apple trees or psychic shrinks. Better humanity end forever than to live under an unbreakable yoke.
I realized something about myself while listening arthir talk about cislunar colonisation from my miniaturised speakers conected to a computer in my poket wirelessly wearing clothes made out of a fabric developed for space exploration while siting on the floor of a log cabin warmed by a fire I made rubing two stick together and carbing a flute out of a cow bone with a stone axe I made myself I am a techno barbarian
If you speak true and not a nice story or anecdote..then yes..and you are awesome xD Would like to hang out with you and make a drum from skin of that cow..so we could play some music and add to human culture xD
Thanks you Sir, this video has arrived at the right time. I have just finished my 1st novel set on a research station at the L2 point and this video has helped with the science. Thank you Isaac Arthur, I will give you a mention if it ever gets published.
Is anyone else getting weird video lags every ~5 seconds or so? It's happening for me in 3 different browsers, at both high and low resolutions. The audio is fine, though.
upload glitches, youtube gets them sometimes in the first 24 hours on longer videos and I had to reupload this last night, normally I put them up a week or more out
I think the most useful definition of a "multiplanetary species" is that of having a human presence on another planet which is capable of surviving and growing on its own.
I've followed your stuff for years and I've got to say - your sheer output is incredible. I don't know how you have the time to create all of the stunning 3D visuals to accompany every concept you describe.
Wouldn't it make more sense for rotating space stations to use the momentum from the catapulting of space vessels to maintain their rotation or even to assist with station-keeping instead of having to counteract that momentum transfer with the burning of fuel to create yet another momentum transfer?
@@PGGraham Theoretically, if we have nuclear propulsion, we can accelerate at 1G for the first half of a trip and slow down at 1G for the second half. However, those are short trips of less than 100 light-years. There is a maximum speed for the engine, and once we hit it, are stuck at that speed until we reach the slow-down window.
Practically speaking, only with a spaceship drive that consumed basically no fuel. Not "perfect conversion of matter to energy" no-fuel, "probably violates conservation of energy and/or momentum" no-fuel. If fuel is a concern, people are going to point out that you could get superior or equivalent performance from short burns and lots of coasting.
Great video! So how soon can we expect all this to occur? I'm guessing not in my lifetime unfortunately. I think I'll be lucky if I make it into space at all! In any case, I'm glad to see that some folks are still seriously considering our prospects as a space-faring community.
Hi Isaac, have you ever read a Japanese sci fi novel series called Crest of the Stars? Maybe it's just me not reading enough novels, but this one is the first I read in which a galactic empire doesn't care for planets. Its first class citizens are all transhumen who live their entire life on space habitats. When the empire "invade" a planet for land marking purpose, they just have their millions of star ships do a drive by without firing on anything on the planet and announce to the planet that they have conquered the planet. In terms of scale this novel is quite good.
While I know space junk was covered a lot in Orbital Infrastructure I think it's more important than a passing mention when it comes to Colonizing Cislunar Space and the Lagrange Points. Not sure if it warrants an entire episode but giving an update on the kind of technology that could be used for cleaning up space junk. Drones for sure but how they could go about it would be interesting to know.
ISAAC, I just had the weirdest thought (and no, I'm not high). I can actually imagine using your recordings as something soothing, to help an infant go to sleep. Has anyone ever suggested something like that to you? I mean, of course anyone can read nursery stories in a soothing voice, but how many people could have their infant sitting there listening to talking about colonising space?!? I'm an Aspie, so thoughts like that tend to simply cross my mind. Thank you for your wonderful content, as always. Cheers!
He's not the only youtuber who puts me to sleep (no offence Isaac, I don't mean it THAT way) because they have a good voice. I just usually have to edit out the starting and ending music.. :)
Railguns on the Moon. One of Heinlein's most perfect predictions. And, while she might indeed be a harsh mistress, Luna is also so important to everything we need to do going forward; sort of like the crazy, hot girlfriend who is also incredibly rich . . .
Another awesome video and we Another series dealing with becoming an Interplanetary species like the expanse. Developing and colonizing our own solar system is a lot more interesting than what space opera talks about.
I have yet to read the NSS report, but I'd like to know what we're going to do with the Van Allen radiation belts if we're going to colonize cislunar space.
Is anyone else seeing an odd flickering in the video near the end? It seems to skip frames, especially visible right before the Brilliant ad at the end of the video.
I don’t think this was the first time watching this video, but he talks about space expansion to orbiting habitats. In my comments on videos about the expansion of human beings to space, I had to point out the need for Earth grade gravity, and the use of Hyper Gravity Vehicle Habitats. In this video, Issac talks about the fact that we will have our first Large Scale Space Habitats not too far from Earth… He doesn’t tell us about how we will get thousands of people to want to go through the agony of getting to orbit or wanting to stay there other than overpopulation. Of course, there will be the few who want to be there just because it’s outer space and fewer who are in shape and trained to go to orbit. Yet, in hundreds of years, humanity will need to expand to orbit just as we will run out of land on Earth for more land in space, man-made lands, habitats… Issac talks about what resources we’ll need from space, as I have commented that we will need a reason to mine the Moon and asteroids more than science experiments. Relativity Space will most likely be one of the first to start space mining to make the 3D Printing done in space more affordable, but that is done in space for space use… What we need is something to mine and bring back to earth like rare Earth elements and the Helium 3 for our future power stations, but I’ve heard about cheaper and less effective nuclear power stations. Cheaper nuclear power plants brought to us by Tech for Luddites; ua-cam.com/video/C6BGLgJY0Wg/v-deo.html Will the new cheaper power plants be cheaper than mining the Helium 3? The use of Helium 3 in the Moon's power plants because we mine the Helium 3 there, but the Moon is radiated from space radiation, so will it be easier to use the spent nuclear waste that we already have? We need a rich billionaire to fund the development of the mining of Helium 3 before we move to Mars… As I’ve commented about the need to travel through space faster is needed before we start the big space projects. It sounds as if we will be using Nuclear Thermal Propulsion soon so that within ten years we can get these projects moving faster through space… I copy all of my comments to; thenewmars.wordpress.com/ for your easy reading…
I really don't get the fascination with Mars. I have little to no interest in humans colonizing Mars. Now the Moon... I'm 100% for colonizing Luna and the area around space.
Why not both? If you can colonize the moon, you can colonize Mars. The requirements really aren't very different. Arguably, the moon may be worse, due to the extreme temperature variations and extremely long days and nights.
The appeal of Mars is long term, it would make a better permanent home than Luna. That said, we have to learn to walk before we can run, thus we need test beds close to Earth to figure out the kinks of long term space settlement, so a few spacesteads in Earth's orbit and stations on Luna are the best near term ideas.
That’s definitely one piece of technology we could use as a ship in orbit with arms on the outside and as the ship orbits its arms can grab pieces of space just. The arm puts it in I call the mouth where inside is technology that dismantled everything down to individual stuff. Then can melt it down and stored for pickup with another ship that can take the materiel and 3D print parts for space infrastructure or ships. With a small fleet we could clean earth orbit up and reuse it all
@@PerfectAlibi1 i think in a wheelchair when a wheel makes full circle is counted as a step, that is if you mark a point on a wheel and how much wheelchair moves untill that point returns to its starting place. But you can call it first roll...i guess... One should never let anything stop him/her.. if steps are not possible..then roll..if not roll..then crawl... but always there can be movement.. xD
What do you think about mining He3 on the moon, and using that for fusion, compared to power satellites? - I've heard that losses from beaming the energy though atmosphere will be rather large...
We could likely use satellites for power using current technology. Fusion on the other hand is still out of our reach. Has been "a decade away" for 60 years now lol
@@reichrunner1 That's true about Deuterium fusion. I think He3+He3 fusion is already feasible, but He3 is incredibly expensive(= rare on Earth). However: There are loads of it on the moon from solar wind, fully replenished every month (= lunar day). - We just don't pursue He3 fusion much, because it seems uneconomic (we don't have fuel for it), _but_ if we could mine it on the moon, it would actually be very economic even with importing it all the way here. - Also, it produces protons, not neutrons like 'classical' fusion. You cannot control neutrons with with magnetic fields, and they 'corrode' the reactor over time and make things radioactive. This problem disappears with protons.
@@reichrunner1 In theory (from what I've heard) it actually turns out cheaper and much more efficient, than huge losses from beaming energy through air, which, btw: those losses would warm up the atmosphere (although, rather little, compared to all normal sunlight, but if we had many such satellites...) - Landing huge tanks of He3 would also produce heat, but it should be relatively easy to manufacture them on the moon, so at least, we wouldn't need to launch the empty tanks to the moon. This would still produce less heat than beaming through atmosphere... (I think)
He3+Deuterium is also a possibility. Also aneutronic. By normal Deuterium fusion before, I meant Deuterium + Tritium (what ITER uses, and most conventional attempts)
I think Lagrange points push outwards, like antigravity, instead of attracting, like regular gravity... it's a vortex made of 2 gravitational fields opposing each other
@isaac, can you do an episode on the possibility of singular living or artificial entities the size of galaxies or larger(galaxy to local cluster and each step up) eventually reaching the possibility of organic, artifical and/or synthetic creations so large that it's beyond clusters possibly taking up whole voids or even filament and wall sized taking up significant chunks of our know visible universe? Kinda dipping into the lore of marvel comics and trying to assign a physical scale to their manifestation. Thanks!
Re: Solar sails. Silver is 5% more reflective than Aluminum and, due to it's high ductility, can be made into a very thin foil. Also, the moons regolith contains more silver than high grade ores on Earth so it can be sourced and delivered to a ship's in-space construction site cheaply. Silver should be considered for solar sails as an alternative to Aluminum.
@Isaac Arthur Just a note, signil merch site has an expired HTTPS cert. The certificate for www.signil.com expired on 4/6/2020. Error code: SEC_ERROR_EXPIRED_CERTIFICATE
I understand that some people are not wired to pronounce the "R" sound, and I hardly notice it, but what does catch my attention is your pronunciation of the word "volume" as "valume". I hope my comment isn't rude or annoying. I love your brilliant work!
One could only wonder how Isaac Arthur is able to create so many, such high-quality productions! One might begin to think, that Isaac is, in fact, a Jupitar Brain! :O :P :D
Really great video. How would the lag be on a phone call between someone living in the earth sun L1 point and someone on the surface of the earth? Would you be able to notice?
I wonder how those birds are flying in that rotating station. Artificial gravity by centrifugal force keeps thing on the ground, but without an attachment to the ground, you're in microgravity, right?
No, there is no magic force that keeps the air from spinning with the structure that encloses it. If a part of the spin axis is in "open air" (contiguous with the air above the "landscape"), then the birds would be in "microgravity" THERE. Below (outward from) the axis, spinning with the enclosed air gives you spin gravity; more the further from the axis. At a moderate distance from the axis, a bird (or a drone or a vehicle) might be able to remain objectively "motionless" by flying anti-spinward against the motion of the internal air. Technically, even at the outer floor, moving anti-spinward relative to the floor reduces your "weight", and moving spinward relative to the floor, increases it, but on a torus or cylinder with a large enough diameter to produce 1 G with 2 or 3 RPM, you'd never notice this effect at walking speed.
Clarification: You said the L1 point is "unstable," and the L4 and L5 points are "stable." The diagram for the Lagrange points, has arrows on one axis pointing in and perpendicular arrows are pointing out for L1, L2, and L3. Based on those arrow, I interpreted these points as semi-stable, not unstable. The arrows around L4 and L5 had all arrows around them pointed out. I interpreted these points as unstable. I was expecting a stable Lagrange point to have all arrows around it pointing in. Could you explain my error in reasoning. My quess: I am likely interpreting things in terms of math notation, particularly the notation if difeq, since I am a mathematician. However, the diagram uses physics or engineering notation which is formatted differently.
As a metallurgist, I scoff at a robot lugging around an aluminium refinery in a vacuum. Check out the electrochemistry of aluminium and how it needs electrorefining in a reducing molten salt environment.
"Cost" is a relative term in this context! Should we even be thinking of $ value in a product or should it be a function of manpower to produce the system that produces the system that eventually produces the product? Obviously we are in a cash economy here on Earth but other models become available and may even be preferable in a post scarcity economy ...... which is what this is creating! We may even get a dualistic model like we see in Star Treak where interactions can be entered into on a monetary basis but general living within the system is cash free!
I think talking about cost is still valid. Even in post-scarcity, you want to discourage certain behaviors (like ordering 1000 hamburgers at once from the replicator). If you use a quota system, then the currency might be quota credits. (Example: I'll give you 2 kJoules of my energy quota if you say "Make it so".) What the currency IS matters less than the ability to signify value. In a post-scarcity world, influencers might finally get the "exposure" currency to catch on.
Dollars are what we've got. Considering the number of political thinkers who can more easily imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism...well, it's a cost factor that's easy to research, share, and understand.
There is a $ cost element to set up for sure .... but once you get past 1st generation production it becomes availability rather than cost! The 10,000 burger order at the replicator could be stopped by peer pressure or even summary execution ... or anything in between! It is a bit like the free chocolate biscuits available for workers to eat in the chocolate biscuit factory. At first they scoff them down but it soon pales and people only take what they want/ need!
Star Trek didn't invent anything. It was only practical execution of ideas already debated on Earth, though I would not mention the name as Americans get diarrhea in the ignorance.
@@timothymclean It shouldn't be surprise, because capitalism is absolutely natural like gravity. Problem are only extreme interpretations if not worship of something what is just simple logic. Even in Star Trek there was a trade between civilizations and local exchange on Earth (mostly handmade goods). It is just that people have guaranteed Social Welfare as resources and production was so cheap, that you didn't need keep competition to keep costs even lover.
A question about the live-action segments that take place on Mars: what is the source videos for those scenes? I've looked all over the Internet for this source video, but I can't seem to find it anywhere. HELP!!!
I agree! I believe that everybody has gotten space exploration wrong since the inception of the "Space Age." Channeling imperial explorers of ages past we have treated the Moon and Mars like they were islands upon which we must plant our boots (and flags). To me this is, in the case of Mars, just romantically-driven target fixation. And what are we trying to achieve here? Colonization? Whatever that means? A few scientists occupying a small base with nothing much to do is a ridiculously expensive and ultimately unsustainable indulgence! The unspoken assumption in all these space dreams is the creation of a self-sustaining space-faring civilization. We need to re-set our thinking with this correct objective in mind. Forget Mars for now. For the foreseeable it will be a ruinous financial burden that will almost certainly fail. Phobos? First you don't "land" on an asteroid you dock with it! Any activity there will throw rocks and dust off of its near zero-G surface. We need to first develop cis-lunar industrial infrastructure - asteroid mining, manufacture and construction. Systems that log and manipulate asteroids will also give us planetary protection. Moon mining will give us fuel and other useful by-products and we can build large habitats and space-based telescopes on the dark side and the L-Points. Once we "digest" these opportunities the rest of the solar system, including Mars, is wide open to us. The objective should be the creation of a self-sustaining space-faring civilization. The mistaken assumption is that a vague multi-billion dollar programme of Mars "colonization" will give us that. It's far more likely that a landing on Mars will end up being an Apollo-style "flash in the unsustainable pan" that however momentarily impressive, will be terminated the minute there is a real shock to the world's budgets that are its only support. The only way we will ever have a self-sustaining space-faring civilization is if its finances and infrastructure are carefully marshalled and not dissipated by romantically-indulgent billion-dollar long-shots. In a field where billion-dollar budgets can be blown with not much to show for it we need to be rational about what our objective is!
How do you arrange designations of LaGrange Points? That is, would L4 between Earth and the Moon be called "Earth/MoonL4?" Would "Sun/EarthL4" be the LaGrange point between the Sun and the Earth?
Translunar cycler picks up KE through continual Lunar slingshots then transfers this via a 1000 km zipline to suborbital capsules lofted from Earth that then take mag-break rides at 3Gs. You could build 1300 of these for a interplanetary trip at suborbital launch cost every half hour. After a decade's operation this is a mere million humans roaming around Sol system. The same system helps lift cargo from your station on Luna's trailing edge.
2:18 - 2:27 "Vanguard" space shuttle created by 3D artist Kibarreto. Available for sale through [a major 3D animation software website]. I have it, it's a great 3D model, and I like seeing it in someones film work.
about that lunar rover swarm prospecting for resources, I can imagine a company that builds and sends the robots to the Moon with telepresence features, then allowing folks on Earth to try their hand at driving the rover around for a cost like a monthly subscription game. Heck, if people find resources the company might allow the finder to keep a portion of the profits and we have minecraft on the Moon (well, all mining, not a lot of crafting)
How much material could be taken off the moon before it destabilizes its orbit or lessens the title forces on the earth in ways that would have an effect on earths environment? Would that also be a reason to start mining the asteroid belt sooner than later and just keep as much of that material on the moon for lunar purposes like, lunar city’s and factories?
Looking at that cis-lunar space map, L3 would be the perfect place to set up solar powered factories. Smelting plant to process all that space ore into building material.
Having learned that the Earth's hill sphere is around 3 000 000 km I thought about connecting orbital rings in a line to make a cooling disk. I estimated that it could easily radiate away 10 000 times the sun light which falls on the earth's surface and thus we could become with this at least 1.4 or 1.3 on the Kardashev scale. One part for cooling and one part for collecting sun light but the interesting part is the cooling function. I estimated 400 W/m² to be radiated away at cozy temperatures.
To me this video makes the case that it is a good thing that the earth has an "overpopulation" "problem," if we are moving toward becoming a spacefaring species or civilization, I would think having billions of people on Earth, would be a good thing, because we would have numerous people to colonize other places, like the Moon, Mars, or space stations in various locations around any of those celestial bodies. So why do we see any negative feedback about the worlds population by the news media or scientists? I have my theories, but don't want to go into a multiple chapter comment here, so I'll leave it at that for now, and only plant the seed of that thought in the minds of those who read this comment. Question everything!
Hey isaac I realized after years of listening to you, you're my internet bae. I dont think I'll ever forget you or your channel. You trap me with every episode. One thing though... can we get some more inside jokes? I miss the cheeseburger jokes, your voice sounds nice though. Im glad youve gotten over the pronunciation problem. Keep it up xox =)
"Oh, give me a locus where the gravitons focus
Where the three-body problem is solved,
Where the microwaves play down at three degrees K,
And the cold virus never evolved
Oh Home, home on LaGrange,
Where the space debris always collects,
We possess so it seems, two of Man’s greatest dreams:
Solar power and zero-gee sex
Sung with melody from Home on the Range... dude you made a space cowboy song!
I wish I could like this comment more than once.
Zero-G sex would be interesting...and more likely problematic. On Earth, gravity takes care of the momentum problem. But without it, every movement sends you spinning and/or coasting off somewhere.
I guess that's what we will use padded rooms for.
@@sab1751 from the Black Pants Legion's song writer. Check out Tex talks battletech and it will come up. I could spend hours listening to that beautiful voice smooth as lunar regolith and as sweet as the dead sea.
That was fabulous, thank you.
Oh, what a coincidence! It's about 31 steps from my room to the fridge for a snack and a drink!
I have actually have a fridge(that is larger than the one in my kitchen mind you) for drinks and snacks right next to my desk. Just gotta roll the chair to the side a bit!
Legendary comment
What drink and snack do you prefer??
"Maa, bathroom!"
@@rickandelon9374 I prefer some cashews and my fav beer.... Bud light
I'm not religious.
But videos like these give me something to believe in.
I have faith in mankind, we'll screw it up, somehow.
Electromagnetic currents connect the Sun's magnetic field to the Earth and to the other planets. Every star connects to the center of every galaxy and the center of each galaxy connects into the plasma fields that your avi so wonderfully depicts. Plasma in space acts as a superconductor. The universe is electromagnetically connected. The awakening into an electromagnetic universe feels like a religious experience.
Intelligence is like a blade: it is neutral. Only based on the motivation to use it determines good or evil. Intelligence with malice is self-serving and wreaks destruction. Conversely, intelligence driven by benevolence can serve mankind and beyond.
@@GeneraluStelaru No the opposite.
@@GeneraluStelaru Um, are you alright dude?😬😬😬
Quality science discussions as always. 3D illustrations are just icing on the cake. 🍰
Thank you kindly!
22:30 reminded me of an anecdote on the building of Brasilia, Brazil: there used to be an industrial size concrete-mixer that would mix concrete non-stop (yes, 24/7) until it broke & had to be replaced. the calculations showed that it was less expensive to buy a new concrete-mixer ever 30 days than turn it off for maintenance.
so I can easily see companies shipping these kinds of robots to the Moon periodically & using them until it stops working (or its marginal production falls too low) & needs to be replaced.
@@levetbyck well, if you want to build a new capital in 5 years, you don't replace parts, you replace the whole thing just after it breaks down.
@@jgr7487 News Flash, our Capital is already broken!
@@Ramiromasters I'm from there, & it's been broken for quite a long time.
@@Ramiromasters therefore, a new one is needed!
@@jgr7487 My country's capital is broken, but I don't think making a new one would help much. The broken parts would just come with.
So we are currently living inland on the plains, with some very minor settlements on the coast. We still tend to build the ships and truck them to the sea before setting sail Very close to the coast. But once we start settling fully the coasts and harbors, getting out to sea and the wider ocean becomes so much easier.
Most of Human civilzation resides close to or on the coasts. I would expect space to fairly similar.
Interesting analogy.🤔🤔
Thanks, Isaac for making these kinds of videos, really cool to see other people thinking about this kind of stuff. I don't get talk to people about these topics in everyday life, but every video is like a cool discussion on the future. Bonus points for helping broaden the imagination of what could be achieved for many people watching you for the first time. You never know who your videos could set on a path. Great work, keep it up!
My pleasure!
Seconded... ^^
@@isaacarthurSFIA Thanks for the video!
The exhaust plume rising as the rocket passes at about 0:23 seems wrong. Wouldn't the exhaust plume be pushed downwards? Is there ever a situation - like in outer space, when a rocket is moving super fast - where a rocket's exhaust plume ends up moving in the same direction as the rocket, and still acts to increase the rocket's speed?
@@FLPhotoCatcher If the rocket is moving faster than the exhaust velocity, the net movement of the exhaust will be forward. The momentum transfer still happens because the exhaust is still travelling backwards with respect to the rocket.
@@cf453 That makes sense. It does seem strange that if a rocket zooms past, and its exhaust is moving in the same direction, that the exhaust could be providing additional speed to the rocket.
Seeing you mention "your friend Joe Scott" makes me inexplicably happy
Ive always said the yammering about Mars was stupid. This is the first step in becoming an actual spacefaring civilization.
AmsterdamHeavy I think they both serve important but different purposes. Mars is the best option for a large colony (and large I mean millions) to be our second home, while the lunar space is better for mining, launches and orbital construction facilities.
I believe we are already an actual spacefaring civilization. Hell men have walked on the moon!! Men live in low orbit for months at a time.
Mars is a fine place to colonize. So is the Moon. I think both should be colonized.
If Stellaris has taught me anything its this... we need as many colonies and populations as we can get and as fast as we can get them.
@@roblaquiere8220 Until we can settle at L4 or L5, the rest is all bullshit - like the space shuttle was.
@@AmsterdamHeavy Do you seriously think they are lying about the moon landing and space shuttles?
Or do you mean to say that those achievements are meaningless?
Either way I think you are wrong. There is evidence of those worthwhile achievements.
@@roblaquiere8220 No, the space shuttle was just very unsafe and hillariously expensive for somethign "reuseable". An upgraded Saturn 5 with 4 decades of experience in it would probably have beaten it hands down in every way possible. Cost. Power. Safety. So would have a shuttle 2.0, not engineered with too many ideas in mind while designing. The F9 is really the first modern rocket since the Saturn....everything else was just regugitation....expensive regurgitation. More boosters. More cost. More unsafe bodges. More hypergolics (looking at the russians here). More recycled 60s designs....
Isaac, your videos are some of the few that I can endure watching at normal speed (instead of 1.5 or 1.75 for the really slow speakers) because it gives me more time to enjoy the ideas you share with us.
Love your content, keep it up please.
Step 1: we colonize the moon.
Step 2: then colonize Lagrange points.
Step 3: ?
Step 4: make mobile suits.
Step 5: make Gundam IRL, we may need to drop a colony on australia to do this but that is a cost I'm willing to pay.
You honestly think a Gundam could handle the might of a Kangaroo?
nah nah, he said colony drop. We'd be dropping space australia onto australia. No gundams necessary.
@@bluemmmy I mean you are right, even in the Gundam series the Zeon Colony drop could not defeat all of australia. So the Kangaroos will be able to hold out.
@@bluemmmy Screw the kangaroo - fear the Emu, they won an actual declared war against the Australian Army. No vehicles, no firearms, hell not even any opposable thumbs, and they beat a modern infantry that had declared a war of genocide on them.
@@humiecrusher "Neo Australia" would be the proper term.
“The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom.”
― Isaac Asimov
No it's that science has been politicized and curtailed when it doesn't bow.
What Asimov failed to understand is that Science is a _part_ of Society.
Without society there can be no science.
@@bryanclark7608 ... "wisdom" is a reference to that...
@@michaelggriffiths your comment doesn´t have any sense... your entire comment is summarized in the word "wisdom" of the sentence... Are you sure is Asimov who failed to understand...? Is a very simple sentence...
Says the guy who wrote about building an oligarchy and a hive society and made Golan choose anything but free will....
I love Asimov, but I would've done anything, anything, to choose something other than equality with apple trees or psychic shrinks. Better humanity end forever than to live under an unbreakable yoke.
All these jokes about 'colonizing translunar space,' and I'm just like: "Yes, that's when we get to the Jupiter system. It will be awesome."
Only if ""translunar" meant "interlunar". Even then Mars has two moons and is closer.
The lagrange points form a giant peace sign, got it!
An interesting parallel. Coincidence, if you believe in such a concept.
The hippies were actually just aliens! They were trying to teach us
Peace is the way to prosperity.
I realized something about myself while listening arthir talk about cislunar colonisation from my miniaturised speakers conected to a computer in my poket wirelessly wearing clothes made out of a fabric developed for space exploration while siting on the floor of a log cabin warmed by a fire I made rubing two stick together and carbing a flute out of a cow bone with a stone axe I made myself
I am a techno barbarian
If you speak true and not a nice story or anecdote..then yes..and you are awesome xD Would like to hang out with you and make a drum from skin of that cow..so we could play some music and add to human culture xD
Thanks you Sir, this video has arrived at the right time. I have just finished my 1st novel set on a research station at the L2 point and this video has helped with the science. Thank you Isaac Arthur, I will give you a mention if it ever gets published.
Everytime i watch one of your videos i end up playing KSP the whole day...
Ha ha ha
For me it's Endless Space 2 :P Gotta assimilate those aliens
Arthursday is the best day. Thank you for giving us your wisdom.
Today is my birthday and Isaac’s video came out yay :)
Happy birthday man
Happy cake day!
@Sal Vastola don't go thinking it's going to be easier after the 31st of December just because the year is out^^
Happy birthday!
I also have a birthday this year.
Is anyone else getting weird video lags every ~5 seconds or so? It's happening for me in 3 different browsers, at both high and low resolutions. The audio is fine, though.
Yeah, I see it too. Mostly noticeable closer to the end
They're render glitches
upload glitches, youtube gets them sometimes in the first 24 hours on longer videos and I had to reupload this last night, normally I put them up a week or more out
I think the most useful definition of a "multiplanetary species" is that of having a human presence on another planet which is capable of surviving and growing on its own.
I keep getting flashbacks to Anno 2205, it amazes me how perfect the game imitates this real-life systems.
Great game.
Great video, thank you!
Wow, your speech have improved so much over the years! All that hard work paid off ^_^
:Rubs away snack crumbs from under my nose: I can quit Isaac‘s channel any time I want.
I've followed your stuff for years and I've got to say - your sheer output is incredible. I don't know how you have the time to create all of the stunning 3D visuals to accompany every concept you describe.
He's got people for that
The last time I optimized paper clips this early they were papyrus clips.
I love the witty quips at the beginnings of these videos, but this one was especially good.
Always a good day when there is a new Isaac Arthur video!
Get to the lagrange points. That's where the von neuman probes are located
love this series so much
Wouldn't it make more sense for rotating space stations to use the momentum from the catapulting of space vessels to maintain their rotation or even to assist with station-keeping instead of having to counteract that momentum transfer with the burning of fuel to create yet another momentum transfer?
Oh, hey, Joe Scott shoutout!
Thursday is payday only once every two weeks, but every thursday is SFIA day!!! Woot woot!
JWST made it! The science has been incredible and we get 20 years! 🥳 🍾🥂
Isaac, can we have gravity for long trips by purely accelerating and decelerating during the trip?
Yes, but that takes a lot of fuel, or propulsion tech that we don't have - yet.
@@PGGraham Theoretically, if we have nuclear propulsion, we can accelerate at 1G for the first half of a trip and slow down at 1G for the second half. However, those are short trips of less than 100 light-years. There is a maximum speed for the engine, and once we hit it, are stuck at that speed until we reach the slow-down window.
Realistically probably not, even with a better drive system it isn't very efficient
To moon yes mars Venus Hard interstellar no
Practically speaking, only with a spaceship drive that consumed basically no fuel. Not "perfect conversion of matter to energy" no-fuel, "probably violates conservation of energy and/or momentum" no-fuel.
If fuel is a concern, people are going to point out that you could get superior or equivalent performance from short burns and lots of coasting.
Just yesterday I wondered when another part of the upward bound series will come out... And here it is! Thanks isaac
Refound this channel and subscribed. This video informative, but the graphics and music really make it something fun to watch. Thanks!
Great video! So how soon can we expect all this to occur? I'm guessing not in my lifetime unfortunately. I think I'll be lucky if I make it into space at all! In any case, I'm glad to see that some folks are still seriously considering our prospects as a space-faring community.
One for the algorithm, love these videos and finally caught up lol
Hi Isaac, have you ever read a Japanese sci fi novel series called Crest of the Stars? Maybe it's just me not reading enough novels, but this one is the first I read in which a galactic empire doesn't care for planets. Its first class citizens are all transhumen who live their entire life on space habitats. When the empire "invade" a planet for land marking purpose, they just have their millions of star ships do a drive by without firing on anything on the planet and announce to the planet that they have conquered the planet. In terms of scale this novel is quite good.
While I know space junk was covered a lot in Orbital Infrastructure I think it's more important than a passing mention when it comes to Colonizing Cislunar Space and the Lagrange Points. Not sure if it warrants an entire episode but giving an update on the kind of technology that could be used for cleaning up space junk. Drones for sure but how they could go about it would be interesting to know.
Maybe the space junk could be salvaged
ISAAC, I just had the weirdest thought (and no, I'm not high). I can actually imagine using your recordings as something soothing, to help an infant go to sleep. Has anyone ever suggested something like that to you? I mean, of course anyone can read nursery stories in a soothing voice, but how many people could have their infant sitting there listening to talking about colonising space?!? I'm an Aspie, so thoughts like that tend to simply cross my mind. Thank you for your wonderful content, as always. Cheers!
He's not the only youtuber who puts me to sleep (no offence Isaac, I don't mean it THAT way) because they have a good voice. I just usually have to edit out the starting and ending music.. :)
Railguns on the Moon. One of Heinlein's most perfect predictions. And, while she might indeed be a harsh mistress, Luna is also so important to everything we need to do going forward; sort of like the crazy, hot girlfriend who is also incredibly rich . . .
Another really fascinating video!!
Thanks for this Issac!!
I love this show!
It's not Thursday until the SFIA video is uploaded.
Happy Arthursday
Always in awe of your content and research. Love your channel
Another awesome video and we Another series dealing with becoming an Interplanetary species like the expanse. Developing and colonizing our own solar system is a lot more interesting than what space opera talks about.
I have yet to read the NSS report, but I'd like to know what we're going to do with the Van Allen radiation belts if we're going to colonize cislunar space.
To first order, I suppose we are not going to put space colonies in the Van Allen Belts.
Is anyone else seeing an odd flickering in the video near the end? It seems to skip frames, especially visible right before the Brilliant ad at the end of the video.
Happy New Year Isaac! Well 5 hours into to it at this point. New Zealands time zone is fun
Yet another informative video as always Isaac.
I don’t think this was the first time watching this video, but he talks about space expansion to orbiting habitats. In my comments on videos about the expansion of human beings to space, I had to point out the need for Earth grade gravity, and the use of Hyper Gravity Vehicle Habitats. In this video, Issac talks about the fact that we will have our first Large Scale Space Habitats not too far from Earth…
He doesn’t tell us about how we will get thousands of people to want to go through the agony of getting to orbit or wanting to stay there other than overpopulation. Of course, there will be the few who want to be there just because it’s outer space and fewer who are in shape and trained to go to orbit. Yet, in hundreds of years, humanity will need to expand to orbit just as we will run out of land on Earth for more land in space, man-made lands, habitats…
Issac talks about what resources we’ll need from space, as I have commented that we will need a reason to mine the Moon and asteroids more than science experiments. Relativity Space will most likely be one of the first to start space mining to make the 3D Printing done in space more affordable, but that is done in space for space use… What we need is something to mine and bring back to earth like rare Earth elements and the Helium 3 for our future power stations, but I’ve heard about cheaper and less effective nuclear power stations.
Cheaper nuclear power plants brought to us by Tech for Luddites; ua-cam.com/video/C6BGLgJY0Wg/v-deo.html
Will the new cheaper power plants be cheaper than mining the Helium 3? The use of Helium 3 in the Moon's power plants because we mine the Helium 3 there, but the Moon is radiated from space radiation, so will it be easier to use the spent nuclear waste that we already have? We need a rich billionaire to fund the development of the mining of Helium 3 before we move to Mars…
As I’ve commented about the need to travel through space faster is needed before we start the big space projects. It sounds as if we will be using Nuclear Thermal Propulsion soon so that within ten years we can get these projects moving faster through space…
I copy all of my comments to; thenewmars.wordpress.com/ for your easy reading…
I really don't get the fascination with Mars. I have little to no interest in humans colonizing Mars.
Now the Moon... I'm 100% for colonizing Luna and the area around space.
Why not both? If you can colonize the moon, you can colonize Mars. The requirements really aren't very different. Arguably, the moon may be worse, due to the extreme temperature variations and extremely long days and nights.
Oh well, thanks for letting us know. We can rearrange everything for you.
The appeal of Mars is long term, it would make a better permanent home than Luna. That said, we have to learn to walk before we can run, thus we need test beds close to Earth to figure out the kinks of long term space settlement, so a few spacesteads in Earth's orbit and stations on Luna are the best near term ideas.
I want to vacation on the moon in a glass high-rise tower and I want to go swimming in a pool on the top floor!!🤙😁
@@michaelcox1071 I know right? It's a little late now! Wish he spoke up about 15 years ago...sheesh.
That’s definitely one piece of technology we could use as a ship in orbit with arms on the outside and as the ship orbits its arms can grab pieces of space just. The arm puts it in I call the mouth where inside is technology that dismantled everything down to individual stuff. Then can melt it down and stored for pickup with another ship that can take the materiel and 3D print parts for space infrastructure or ships. With a small fleet we could clean earth orbit up and reuse it all
“The journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.”
― Lao Tzu
Lao Tzu: 😏
Me: what if you're wheelchair bound? How do you make that first STEP? XD
@@PerfectAlibi1 i think in a wheelchair when a wheel makes full circle is counted as a step, that is if you mark a point on a wheel and how much wheelchair moves untill that point returns to its starting place. But you can call it first roll...i guess...
One should never let anything stop him/her.. if steps are not possible..then roll..if not roll..then crawl... but always there can be movement.. xD
@@DreamskyDance
Fair enough
@@PerfectAlibi1 Gundam.
@@adaeptzulander2928
I think I got that reference, though not entirely sure... It's been a VERY long time since I last saw that Anime... XD
What do you think about mining He3 on the moon, and using that for fusion, compared to power satellites?
- I've heard that losses from beaming the energy though atmosphere will be rather large...
We could likely use satellites for power using current technology. Fusion on the other hand is still out of our reach. Has been "a decade away" for 60 years now lol
@@reichrunner1 That's true about Deuterium fusion. I think He3+He3 fusion is already feasible, but He3 is incredibly expensive(= rare on Earth). However: There are loads of it on the moon from solar wind, fully replenished every month (= lunar day).
- We just don't pursue He3 fusion much, because it seems uneconomic (we don't have fuel for it), _but_ if we could mine it on the moon, it would actually be very economic even with importing it all the way here.
- Also, it produces protons, not neutrons like 'classical' fusion. You cannot control neutrons with with magnetic fields, and they 'corrode' the reactor over time and make things radioactive. This problem disappears with protons.
@@reichrunner1 In theory (from what I've heard) it actually turns out cheaper and much more efficient, than huge losses from beaming energy through air, which, btw: those losses would warm up the atmosphere (although, rather little, compared to all normal sunlight, but if we had many such satellites...)
- Landing huge tanks of He3 would also produce heat, but it should be relatively easy to manufacture them on the moon, so at least, we wouldn't need to launch the empty tanks to the moon. This would still produce less heat than beaming through atmosphere... (I think)
He3+Deuterium is also a possibility. Also aneutronic.
By normal Deuterium fusion before, I meant Deuterium + Tritium (what ITER uses, and most conventional attempts)
I think Lagrange points push outwards, like antigravity, instead of attracting, like regular gravity... it's a vortex made of 2 gravitational fields opposing each other
Great video. Ate not the VanAllen belts a big enough deal that they should be included in any discussion of Lagrange points for settlements?
@isaac, can you do an episode on the possibility of singular living or artificial entities the size of galaxies or larger(galaxy to local cluster and each step up) eventually reaching the possibility of organic, artifical and/or synthetic creations so large that it's beyond clusters possibly taking up whole voids or even filament and wall sized taking up significant chunks of our know visible universe? Kinda dipping into the lore of marvel comics and trying to assign a physical scale to their manifestation. Thanks!
I always wondered if it was a bad idea to remove mass from the moon. A billion large habitats being okay puts it in perspective.
Re: Solar sails.
Silver is 5% more reflective than Aluminum and, due to it's high ductility, can be made into a very thin foil.
Also, the moons regolith contains more silver than high grade ores on Earth so it can be sourced and delivered to a ship's in-space construction site cheaply.
Silver should be considered for solar sails as an alternative to Aluminum.
SO well done man, as always. Long live the human race.
@Isaac Arthur
Just a note, signil merch site has an expired HTTPS cert.
The certificate for www.signil.com expired on 4/6/2020.
Error code: SEC_ERROR_EXPIRED_CERTIFICATE
@omgomgomgd this is probably your browser not the website. I won’t DOX your browser however you can fix this issue on your own if you look up how too.
We need to get the voyager station built that’s an absolute must!
I understand that some people are not wired to pronounce the "R" sound, and I hardly notice it, but what does catch my attention is your pronunciation of the word "volume" as "valume".
I hope my comment isn't rude or annoying.
I love your brilliant work!
Or almost "vallium" ;-)
United Federation of Planets, here we come!
I really like the Upward Bound theme at the start
Elon has mentioned getting 100mt to LEO for $2M USD with Starship. For Kalpana, 100,000 launches would cost $200B USD.
11:00 hey the LaGrange points make a peace symbol ☮️. I wonder if there's anything connection there?
🌍
One could only wonder how Isaac Arthur is able to create so many, such high-quality productions!
One might begin to think, that Isaac is, in fact, a Jupitar Brain! :O :P :D
Really great video. How would the lag be on a phone call between someone living in the earth sun L1 point and someone on the surface of the earth? Would you be able to notice?
Yes. The earth-moon signal delay is ~2 seconds. The Earth-Sun L1 is much further out than the orbit of Earth's moon.
@@jeremiahgrubbs3462 I guess I could try email. Or if I were on the moon I could play multiplayr games with someone on earth.
Voice messages could be used like a CB radio, along with text. It'd just be delayed, but the sent time could be tagged onto the message.
Zachary
You could definitely play turn-based games like Chess.
I wonder how those birds are flying in that rotating station. Artificial gravity by centrifugal force keeps thing on the ground, but without an attachment to the ground, you're in microgravity, right?
True haha
No, there is no magic force that keeps the air from spinning with the structure that encloses it. If a part of the spin axis is in "open air" (contiguous with the air above the "landscape"), then the birds would be in "microgravity" THERE. Below (outward from) the axis, spinning with the enclosed air gives you spin gravity; more the further from the axis. At a moderate distance from the axis, a bird (or a drone or a vehicle) might be able to remain objectively "motionless" by flying anti-spinward against the motion of the internal air. Technically, even at the outer floor, moving anti-spinward relative to the floor reduces your "weight", and moving spinward relative to the floor, increases it, but on a torus or cylinder with a large enough diameter to produce 1 G with 2 or 3 RPM, you'd never notice this effect at walking speed.
Thank you for FINALLY helping me understand Lagrange Points
Clarification: You said the L1 point is "unstable," and the L4 and L5 points are "stable."
The diagram for the Lagrange points, has arrows on one axis pointing in and perpendicular arrows are pointing out for L1, L2, and L3. Based on those arrow, I interpreted these points as semi-stable, not unstable.
The arrows around L4 and L5 had all arrows around them pointed out. I interpreted these points as unstable. I was expecting a stable Lagrange point to have all arrows around it pointing in.
Could you explain my error in reasoning.
My quess:
I am likely interpreting things in terms of math notation, particularly the notation if difeq, since I am a mathematician. However, the diagram uses physics or engineering notation which is formatted differently.
As a metallurgist, I scoff at a robot lugging around an aluminium refinery in a vacuum. Check out the electrochemistry of aluminium and how it needs electrorefining in a reducing molten salt environment.
"Cost" is a relative term in this context! Should we even be thinking of $ value in a product or should it be a function of manpower to produce the system that produces the system that eventually produces the product?
Obviously we are in a cash economy here on Earth but other models become available and may even be preferable in a post scarcity economy ...... which is what this is creating! We may even get a dualistic model like we see in Star Treak where interactions can be entered into on a monetary basis but general living within the system is cash free!
I think talking about cost is still valid. Even in post-scarcity, you want to discourage certain behaviors (like ordering 1000 hamburgers at once from the replicator). If you use a quota system, then the currency might be quota credits. (Example: I'll give you 2 kJoules of my energy quota if you say "Make it so".)
What the currency IS matters less than the ability to signify value. In a post-scarcity world, influencers might finally get the "exposure" currency to catch on.
Dollars are what we've got. Considering the number of political thinkers who can more easily imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism...well, it's a cost factor that's easy to research, share, and understand.
There is a $ cost element to set up for sure .... but once you get past 1st generation production it becomes availability rather than cost!
The 10,000 burger order at the replicator could be stopped by peer pressure or even summary execution ... or anything in between! It is a bit like the free chocolate biscuits available for workers to eat in the chocolate biscuit factory. At first they scoff them down but it soon pales and people only take what they want/ need!
Star Trek didn't invent anything. It was only practical execution of ideas already debated on Earth, though I would not mention the name as Americans get diarrhea in the ignorance.
@@timothymclean It shouldn't be surprise, because capitalism is absolutely natural like gravity. Problem are only extreme interpretations if not worship of something what is just simple logic. Even in Star Trek there was a trade between civilizations and local exchange on Earth (mostly handmade goods). It is just that people have guaranteed Social Welfare as resources and production was so cheap, that you didn't need keep competition to keep costs even lover.
A question about the live-action segments that take place on Mars: what is the source videos for those scenes? I've looked all over the Internet for this source video, but I can't seem to find it anywhere. HELP!!!
Got my snack and drink!! “Arthur-Thursday’s” has arrived!
It’s 9:24 PM, just in time for an Isaac vid and dinner
That intro made me hit the like button
I agree! I believe that everybody has gotten space
exploration wrong since the inception of the "Space Age." Channeling
imperial explorers of ages past we have treated the Moon and Mars like they
were islands upon which we must plant our boots (and flags). To me this is, in
the case of Mars, just romantically-driven target fixation. And what are we
trying to achieve here? Colonization? Whatever that means? A few scientists
occupying a small base with nothing much to do is a ridiculously expensive and
ultimately unsustainable indulgence! The unspoken assumption in all these space
dreams is the creation of a self-sustaining space-faring civilization. We need
to re-set our thinking with this correct objective in mind. Forget Mars for
now. For the foreseeable it will be a ruinous financial burden that will almost
certainly fail. Phobos? First you don't "land" on an asteroid you
dock with it! Any activity there will throw rocks and dust off of its near
zero-G surface. We need to first develop cis-lunar industrial infrastructure -
asteroid mining, manufacture and construction. Systems that log and manipulate
asteroids will also give us planetary protection. Moon mining will give us fuel
and other useful by-products and we can build large habitats and space-based
telescopes on the dark side and the L-Points. Once we "digest" these
opportunities the rest of the solar system, including Mars, is wide open to us.
The objective should be the creation of a self-sustaining space-faring
civilization. The mistaken assumption is that a vague multi-billion dollar
programme of Mars "colonization" will give us that. It's far more
likely that a landing on Mars will end up being an Apollo-style "flash in
the unsustainable pan" that however momentarily impressive, will be
terminated the minute there is a real shock to the world's budgets that are its
only support. The only way we will ever have a self-sustaining space-faring
civilization is if its finances and infrastructure are carefully marshalled and
not dissipated by romantically-indulgent billion-dollar long-shots. In a field
where billion-dollar budgets can be blown with not much to show for it we need
to be rational about what our objective is!
How do you arrange designations of LaGrange Points?
That is, would L4 between Earth and the Moon be called "Earth/MoonL4?"
Would "Sun/EarthL4" be the LaGrange point between the Sun and the Earth?
Translunar cycler picks up KE through continual Lunar slingshots then transfers this via a 1000 km zipline to suborbital capsules lofted from Earth that then take mag-break rides at 3Gs. You could build 1300 of these for a interplanetary trip at suborbital launch cost every half hour. After a decade's operation this is a mere million humans roaming around Sol system. The same system helps lift cargo from your station on Luna's trailing edge.
Brilliant as usual mate 👌
2:18 - 2:27
"Vanguard" space shuttle created by 3D artist Kibarreto.
Available for sale through [a major 3D animation software website].
I have it, it's a great 3D model, and I like seeing it in someones film work.
about that lunar rover swarm prospecting for resources, I can imagine a company that builds and sends the robots to the Moon with telepresence features, then allowing folks on Earth to try their hand at driving the rover around for a cost like a monthly subscription game. Heck, if people find resources the company might allow the finder to keep a portion of the profits and we have minecraft on the Moon (well, all mining, not a lot of crafting)
How much material could be taken off the moon before it destabilizes its orbit or lessens the title forces on the earth in ways that would have an effect on earths environment?
Would that also be a reason to start mining the asteroid belt sooner than later and just keep as much of that material on the moon for lunar purposes like, lunar city’s and factories?
Looking at that cis-lunar space map, L3 would be the perfect place to set up solar powered factories. Smelting plant to process all that space ore into building material.
Having learned that the Earth's hill sphere is around 3 000 000 km I thought about connecting orbital rings in a line to make a cooling disk. I estimated that it could easily radiate away 10 000 times the sun light which falls on the earth's surface and thus we could become with this at least 1.4 or 1.3 on the Kardashev scale. One part for cooling and one part for collecting sun light but the interesting part is the cooling function. I estimated 400 W/m² to be radiated away at cozy temperatures.
How would we deal with the Van Allen radiation belts?
Well thought out.
To me this video makes the case that it is a good thing that the earth has an "overpopulation" "problem," if we are moving toward becoming a spacefaring species or civilization, I would think having billions of people on Earth, would be a good thing, because we would have numerous people to colonize other places, like the Moon, Mars, or space stations in various locations around any of those celestial bodies. So why do we see any negative feedback about the worlds population by the news media or scientists? I have my theories, but don't want to go into a multiple chapter comment here, so I'll leave it at that for now, and only plant the seed of that thought in the minds of those who read this comment. Question everything!
Hey isaac
I realized after years of listening to you, you're my internet bae. I dont think I'll ever forget you or your channel. You trap me with every episode. One thing though... can we get some more inside jokes? I miss the cheeseburger jokes, your voice sounds nice though. Im glad youve gotten over the pronunciation problem. Keep it up xox =)
thank you for answering my Facebook question:)
I love this channel but it is the science equivalent of "this could be us but you playing".
Why does the national space society's banner-thing at 0:37 look like it jumped out of KSP
Where is the planet Ulthe I can't find it on any star maps.
I was a member of the L5 society. When they merged I got fed up and dropped out because it was apparent to me the group had lost it's way.
There's a Cis-Lunar joke in here somewhere. I hope we can find it!