Why Charter Change may worsen corruption?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 вер 2024
  • The Congress goes down to the last round of voting before they totally approve of the proposed amendment of the Constitution which only focuses on the economic issue. According to a constitutional expert, this may be the cause of a greater corruption in Philippine politics.
    Subscribe to ABS-CBN News channel!
    bit.ly/TheABSCB...
    Watch the full episodes of Bandila on TFC.TV
    bit.ly/BANDILA-...
    and on IWANT.TV for Philippine viewers, click:
    bit.ly/BANDILA-...
    Visit our website at www.abs-cbnnews...
    Facebook: / abscbnnews
    Twitter: / abscbnnews

КОМЕНТАРІ • 40

  • @pauliandelrosario
    @pauliandelrosario 3 роки тому +17

    The Philippines makes itself poorer and poorer, China is corrupt but look at their foreign investments and infrastructures. Politicians only want their title but not the people of the Philippines. #YesToCharterChange #EconomicBoom

  • @exaltrestudio9489
    @exaltrestudio9489 4 роки тому +13

    Tingin ko wag na talaga umasa ang mga Pilipino. Maluto na lang tayo sa sarili nating mantika at panatiliin natin na yung mayaman lang ang yumayaman at mga ordinaryong pilipino ay pahirap lang ng pahirap.
    Kung hindi mapapasa ang federalism parliamentary na reform dito sa pilipinas ay wala na pag asa at wala ng mang yayari.

    • @P1utia
      @P1utia 2 роки тому

      CoRRECTors are stupid. They want parliamentary system when we cant even remove religious politicians which they are more divisive and corrupt than regular politicians. Better off on Fed-Parl-FDI variant than Parl because its obvious.

  • @celsoespejo908
    @celsoespejo908 Рік тому +4

    DON’T SELL OUR LAND TO FOREIGNERS!

  • @EckonOmyst-jv1ro
    @EckonOmyst-jv1ro 7 місяців тому +2

    Marcos Jr’s Cha-cha will only equate to the wanton plunder of our remaining land and natural resources. Instead of devoting our land and resources to the genuine development of domestic agriculture, economy, and industries, ChaCha will allow more foreign-owned extractive industries, logging, ecotourism, real estate projects, expansion of agro-corporation plantations, and other business operations intended for profit-making.
    Furthermore, 100 percent foreign ownership of land may also further drive the displacement and ejection of farmers and indigenous people.
    Land agents will rush into land grabbing, coercive land purchases, land banking, and land selling. This implies a broader displacement of farmers and indigenous people, imposition of higher land rents, further losses for farmers, cessation of farming activities, land conversion, and the dissolution of agricultural livelihoods.
    the proposed Charter Change will end jeopardizing food security and livelihood for Filipinos, leading to widespread hunger, loss of livelihoods, and increased poverty

    • @EZDEVLO
      @EZDEVLO 4 місяці тому +1

      Look at vietnam, They are a socialist state yet they give 100% percent foreign ownership of lands, And now look at them, They have a better gdp and gdp per capita than us now, On the 1960s they used to be a lot more poorer than us, Also giving 100% foreign ownership will encourage investors to rely on Philippines, Why stand against change when it is needed, Don't listen to these politicians, They also want land ownership to gain power and money for their own.

    • @EZDEVLO
      @EZDEVLO 4 місяці тому

      Look at Vietnam today, They are a socialist state yet they give 100% percent foreign ownership of lands, And now look at them, They have a better GDP and GDP per capita than us now, On the 1960s they used to be a lot more poorer than us, Also giving 100% foreign ownership will attract foreign investors to invest on Philippines, Why stand against change when it is needed, Don't listen to these politicians, They also want land ownership to gain power and money for their own.

  • @lawlevph
    @lawlevph 7 місяців тому

    Up

  • @EckonOmyst-jv1ro
    @EckonOmyst-jv1ro 7 місяців тому

    Just look at what will happen after everything gets privitized. Here is an example:
    Filipinos should brace for higher passenger service charges (PSC) of as much as 95 percent at the Ninoy Aquino International Airport (NAIA) when its management goes to the hands of a private group.
    The Manila International Airport Authority (MIAA), regulator of NAIA, is proposing a schedule of rate hikes for NAIA services in preparation for the impending turnover of airport operations to a private firm.
    A document seen by The STAR showed that the PSC for domestic travelers will almost double to P390, from P200, in the first year of the operations and maintenance under a private group.

    • @amparoconsuelo9451
      @amparoconsuelo9451 5 місяців тому

      The phrase "unless otherwise provided by law" is literally and figuratively a black hole, a bottomless pit and an abyss where everything is allowed and possible. It can be used to perpetuate power by providing that incumbent legislators shall be lifetime members of a constitutionally created body that approves projects and programs and formulates policies.

  • @RatedJBR
    @RatedJBR 2 роки тому +5

    Kapal ng pagmumukha ni Monsod!!! 🤮🤦🏻‍♂️
    Nauto ako sa "no to chacha" na yan.
    Dapat mag Fed-Parl-FDI na thru Charter Change!

    • @ahkapajurr9923
      @ahkapajurr9923 2 роки тому

      Nasira ehhh dati si Fidel Ramos gusto ng Charter Change nasira dahil sa propaganda, ito namn si Erap nasira dahil sa rally kasi gusto amendahan ang 1987 cons. ito namn si PGMA Cha-cha propaganda rin

    • @P1utia
      @P1utia 2 роки тому

      No, not this stupid Parl system, it should be only what Cory provided, i meant the presidential system. But obviously im in favor of a more better Fed-Pres-FDI than Fed-Parl-FDI. We would be like India or Bangladesh if we use parliamentary and we will not achieve or even surpass Singapore in growth if we copied them.

    • @TimeMakerDotPH
      @TimeMakerDotPH Рік тому +3

      ​@@P1utiaProblema sa mga cinite mo na examples is WALA TALAGA SILANG PROBLEMA PAGDATING SA PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM, India and Bangladesh have healthy and stable democracy kung saan tumatagal ng ilang taon yung mga prime minister.
      Nagkaroon sila ng problema sa ECONOMIC POLICY kasi they were protectionist socialist countries in the past and they've just began liberalizing their economy in the 1990s.
      It is the economic policy NOT the political system.
      Ikaw na nagsabi ng Singapore. Hindi mo ba alam Singapore is unitary (since maliit silang bansa) parliamentary-FDI
      India and Bangladesh are federal (unitary Bangladesh since small country din) parliamentary pero HINDI OPEN TO FDI IN THE PAST.
      Hay nako, misinforming a lot of people, you need to do a lot of proper research before mag-comment.

    • @P1utia
      @P1utia Рік тому

      @@TimeMakerDotPH Ignore it. Neutral on the parl system i dont care about it anymore.

  • @jeunpadilla8825
    @jeunpadilla8825 6 місяців тому

    Jointly please. Hindi hiwalay. Jointly discuss the ammendments. Ya more money in government more money to steal.

    • @amparoconsuelo9451
      @amparoconsuelo9451 5 місяців тому

      The phrase "unless otherwise provided by law" is literally and figuratively a black hole, a bottomless pit and an abyss where everything is allowed and possible. It can be used to perpetuate power by providing that incumbent legislators shall be lifetime members of a constitutionally created body that approves projects and programs and formulates policies.

  • @rockzfunk1661
    @rockzfunk1661 3 роки тому +5

    China syndicates puwede ng mag tayo ng company
    100 %

    • @bossmadammoose1948
      @bossmadammoose1948 2 роки тому

      Ang gawin nilang restriction is "The President of the Philippines can put restrictions through Executive Order/ Presidential Proclamation or Presidential Decrees. After 60 days of implementation, these restrictions will be automatic invalid or expired

    • @_deeayedee
      @_deeayedee Рік тому

      What a conspiracy theory. 🤡💀

  • @giovannialigaen857
    @giovannialigaen857 Рік тому

    What no stable government, 4 pumas☺😈

  • @bahemisadan3684
    @bahemisadan3684 3 роки тому +1

    Biwist. Gusto nyo pa rin ang 1987 constitution? 30 plus years na yan.

  • @tohanan3426
    @tohanan3426 2 роки тому

    Bubu rockz

  • @getfrank25
    @getfrank25 Рік тому

    worsen daw? baliw talaga tong abs cbn ahaha

  • @ronaldfoyagao6894
    @ronaldfoyagao6894 6 місяців тому

    the problem with chacha is that rumauldez, and his oligarch cohorts surely influence the crafting..almost all tongressman owns or not invenators of big corp. surely they will craft laws favoring thier own interest..