"This is a gun. Can you guess which hole that goes through? That's right! It goes in the square hole." This is the reason kids need that kind of toy when growing up.
LPL has never worked under a Manager, attended a job interview, or rented an apartment. Landlord: "The only way you'll get your security deposit back is to prove you never entered your apartment!" Manager: "I had to let everyone else go. You'll have to do all their work without a raise. Just be grateful you still have a job!" Interviewer: "This is an Entry Level position. You need at least 5 years of experience!"
I believe, that as a Lawyer, he knows when he can insult someone and be sure he can prove in court, that it was not an insult, just a statement of a fact 🤣
Yeah he's legitimately mad about this one and righty so, the purpose of this safe is too important to be this flawed, and it made it past WAY too many people for this company to be taken seriously when it comes to firearm security.
As far as I know, gun safes are mostly a scam, because more often than not they're just used as a pretext for the owner to avoid accountability in case something goes wrong. They mainly serve as an excuse for the gun owners, in case the weapon gets stolen or misused for something sinister, to claim they had duly stored the weapon in a safe. The actual security of said safe is of no concern in the matter.
@@TheSmokePope You only calling particular product a piece of shit, I would also say this particular product made by piece of shits. People who make terrible designed products are piece of shits
You seem to have it mixed up, Twitter users aren't sentient, that implies consciousness and awareness of your surroundings, as well of your own existence and the implications that come with it
I work in IT, and my co-workers and I often talk to clients about the dangers of outdated security practices and technologies. One of our favorite analogies when it comes to demonstrating how broken security can be worse than no security at all is to say something along the lines of, "you've been dutifully locking the door every day but ignoring the gaping hole in the middle of it." I never thought I would see such a perfectly-designed real-life example of the concept.
The locked gate securing precious kiddos can be defeated with a piece of string or a Skinny Guy(tm) like me (6'5" 260lbs) squeezing through the gap . It's all security theater.
LPL: ... a full-sized handgun. That's important. Me: What, does it not close properly - LPL: _reaches his entire hand into the massive hole_ Me: _Oh no._
Me: hmmm why is he highlighting the gun being large? I wonder does it stop the drawer closing properly and not licking, does it interfere with the mechanism. I notice it has a threaded barrel maybe that pokes onto the latch….. oh even though it’s a big gun you can just pull it out, wow
@@pj4433 Yeah I was wondering too if the gun would prevent proper locking due being too big, nope it seems the makes of this "safe" just forgot that having a big hole in the door kind of makes it useless, even doors with windows on them (or metal framed glass doors) have glass covering up the holes in them.
Wish my uncle were still alive, I'd show this to him lol. He was always talking about how gun safety was a big priority, but then bought the absolute stupidest crap to "secure" his guns. As he was bragging about his new gun safe, I picked the cylinder lock using the edge of a strip of small staples as a tension wrench, and set the pins with a tack. As he's going on and on about how I'm wasting my time and I'll never get it open, it opens.
@@Kenny__UK @BigArmBoss There's a not-oft-used / older slang sense of "to lick" which means "to (soundly) defeat", so it could work. Not sure LPL will be adopting it any time soon though.
Honestly this seems like they tried that and the knob/digital panel/fingerprint scanner manufacturer fell through. They could at least JB Weld in the panel through, for goodness' sake
@@OdiumTV This was my first thought too...the drawer was probably straight out of a small cabinet or something and they just replaced the lock mechanism with a fingerprint lock.
I like to think this was intentionally made for those places that are, by law or something, required to have a "safe" but don't actually want the gun to be locked.
Its amusing the reviews the safe currently has are mostly complaining how fast the keypad batteries die. None of them have figured out the handy backup opening hatch yet, lol
i'm nearly speechless. I was actually thinking "I bet the weight of the 'full sized' handgun causes it to pop open when mounted under the desk", but this. Bloody hell.
@@JamesSullivan-ru4opu guys could address the problems that lead you to the feel of needing guns in the first place. They are not the solution, just a patch keeping you from solving the real problems
@@TheDasHatti you going to get rid of sharp and heavy objects, cars? Also the 2nd Amendment was to uphold the constitution. The reality of the world is there is no fix, protect yourself or don't, it's up to you.
This is why channels like this are so friggen important. To show how many companies rip people off with cheaply made garbage. This company should be embarassed if they don’t know and if they did know then that’s just criminal
@@petermgruhn Umm because when someone spends money on a “Gun safe” they usually want their gun to be safe. Please tell me your comment was sarcasm. Please.
Your video caught my attention, and I love the way you present ideas. It’s clear you put effort into your content. Excited to see what else your channel has in store!
I was looking at the door when he jiggled it and thinking "he's just gonna give the door a good pull and the lock will fail", can't believe the actual failure point was even dumber.
1:03 I have to note as well, there's a lot of wiggle room in this thing. You want a locked box to be a solid block with seemingly no way to pry it open. Not something you can destroy with the back end of a nail hammer.
There is an old Andy Griffith show where the bank robbers crack the safe. Sherriff Andy is really happy because the bank lost the combination ago so they just cut a back door into the safe. I think that show's writer designed this safe.
@antoniodominguezjr4734 you really haven't been around people in general have you? Cause if you do, you'll meet and see some dumb motherfuckers. Hell, just a couple weeks ago, I saw some dude walk out of their car into the middle of the highway. Their car was broken down in the middle lane. Literally so dumb you don't know how they're breathing. It's inevitable when you go online or go outside that you'll see dumb.
For when you want it to look safe if an inspector comes, but also need fast, discreet access because there’s a reason you keep it hidden under your desk at work. 😅
LockPickingLawyer: "It is legitimately hard for me to imagine a sentient being that is this dumb and still breathing." Me: "I take it you haven't met my coworkers."
Last week my coworker asked for help, she was trying to add a new thing to the website, ignored all obvious ways to do so(like manage pages/routes) and instead wound up in the configuration changing random values. We had to roll back the changes because she'd broken so much. After telling her not to change it again and showing her the right area she claimed she understood and went back to her desk. 10 minutes later the site was down again after she changed the config again. I sat next to her and told her exactly what to do step by step, the number of times I had to tell her to stop or no because she started going off trying to change random things or clicking random buttons had me dreading today. Some people are just dangerously incompetent and yet somehow still find work.
The casing looks so flexible (like cheap desktop PC case metal) that I'm sure you could just insert a pry bar into the top and flex the top edge to clear the latch anyway. Amazing.
My experience with engineers: the handle was originally steel with locking tabs only accessible on the inside. My experience with management: an off the shelf plastic handle is cheaper, so will save money and sell more units.
Checks out. "Sir, the safe design is tested and this thing is airtight!" "Great, how can we cut corners?" "On a device designed to secure a lethal firearm, sir!?" "CUT. THE. CORNERS!"
@@thexanderthemander might work in some places in the US, but definitely not in Canada. Even if you use a bank-quality safe you can still be charged for not having your firearms secured if someone gets their hands on them due to poor planning on your part. Eg. Going out of town for a week and leaving your house unmonitored. Our instructor had a massive gun collection and one of his friends was also a collector, and went on vacation. Thieves broke into his house and spent a couple of days getting into his gun room. He was charged for not properly securing his firearms when he reported it because it was known he had guns, so anyone knowing he was away had the time to go after them.
@@cannibalholiday Canada is ridiculous these days. Like the two guys who got arrested on a train for talking to each other and someone got offended and told the police.
Your videos are superb; and your knowledge in this field is purely fascinating. I managed to open my safe (when keys were lost), simply from watching your videos.
This reminds me of one time when I was a kid. I put some money in a zipper pouch and then put a lock on it. I then showed my mom that my money was safe. She then quickly showed me that the zipper could still be opened because I locked the tips of the zipper tabs and the pouch was made of fabric. That's why I didn't go into gun safe building.
That's the flaw in most locks. If your typical thief encountered the best door that LPL has ever reviewed obstructing the door to their desired loot, they wouldn't spend an hour with picks or walk away in frustration. They'd go looking for a window to break. The good news for the lock-owner is that the thief might decide burgling the house next door is easier.
I really have to imagine there are a number of bloopers to get that scene right. LPL could be superhuman in regards to getting things correct on the first try but my god is this something that is an extra level of creating a new idiot.
The only thing I can think of as a reason would be that the point of an under desk safe isn't to keep the gun hyper secure, its to keep it available while you are at the desk but secure enough from kids or common foot traffic wherever you are. Its supposed to be 1 step up from just having it in a regular desk drawer. The access in the front could be a fail safe if the electronic lock were to ever malfunction, if someone desires access over security. The handle would be hiding it from kids or any office foot traffic that would ever look at it. Thats all I've got as even a posssible idea here....
@@antiyouthie 100% agree, military grade just means lowest bidder who meets minimum specs. And those minimum specs usually are lower than one might expect.
The best part is that this might well happen with the first thing someone does to try to get a locked drawer open. Pull hard on the handle, * pop *, “Well that was easier than expected”
@@huntedperson3147 or they slapped an existing lock on an already made drawer with that massive hole inside. You just write to the contract in China and they make sure to ask "you want item X put on item Y right", yep just do that, I want 1000 of them. "Okay boss."
Looks to me that they were thinking about making the safe easier to manufacture and completely forgot that would inherently make it easier to disassemble.
The real terrifying part would be someone not knowing this, put this in a home and their kid manages to get the handgun out and... You can see how the rest would go on.
LPL has been humiliating MasterLock for years... so today when he says "Nobody could be that stupid", this can be taken as the highest level of insult!
@@MrLind87 Well, they dont really need them, it is just some stupid requirement that no one cares about most likely. So they get cheapest crap they could find.
And I can see the design team trying to argue "But you would have to KNOW the handle comes off" (Then proceeds to shut the drawer and the handle just falls off). "Just ignore that"
When I saw the cover image, I was thinking you were nitpicking over the designer not securing the trigger from accidental discharge. I thought the gun was locked inside the hole intentionally. WOW was I wrong. That's impressive.
The worst thing about this is that someone trying to pull it open by force will automatically rip open the plastic thingy and get easy access to the gun inside. It's crazy, merely pulling on the handle will defeat the gun safe. What the hell.
Yea - definitely - first thing a thief would probably try to do is grab the handle and give it a yank and the handle just pops off revealing a big hole. Course even if not for that flaw it looks really easy to pry open with a crowbar - which is probably the next thing a thief would do.
@@bubba99009 I saw a pretty significant gap open by just him lightly pulling the handle. I can't imagine how easy it would be to break open by just pulling at full force. You could either just pull it open or pry the metal back with little effort without ever knowing about the handle vulnerability. This thing is a real piece of crap.
I was expecting him to just pop the drawer open by pulling on it with his hand. The handle coming off from pulling on it was second on the list. I'm actually a little disappointed that he used a crowbar.
There was just a story in the news about a toddler accidentally shooting another toddler. Gun safety is the biggest factor with owning a gun and so many people either do not lock up their guns or they do it poorly. A product like this could so easily be circumvented by a child, for example, and the design being intended for under a desk means it's potentially easily within reach of children.
@@HumanPerson_finalsay what you will about Australian gun laws, but the fact that owners are required to install a heavy duty gun safe before they’re allowed to buy a gun really goes a long way to preventing accidents like this.
I wouldn’t call it „insult“. We‘re taking about a gun save. Each toddler can get a gun out of this un-safe. Imagine a 3 year old take a gun out of this save…trigger…
His insulting words are beaten, by far, with the video he showed with them. You can mute the sound, and it will still be an insult to the product designer.
Unfortunately you are absolutely right. Imagine your coming home, expecting a kiss from wife and „baby“…open the door…your toddler is standing with a gun in her hand and your wife has a big hole in her head. You will complain yourself the rest of your life: Why I bought this „safe“.
That handle design is used on quite a few drawers, filing cabinets etc. In my experience after opening it a few times, you might ACCIDENTALLY break into it.
I feel like it would have been more secure if you put the gun inside 2 Ziplock 1 Gallon Freezer bags, and then used Scotch Tape to afix it to the underside of the desk. It would legitimately take you longer to open that way...
any flat instrument would bypass the locking arm just like on a normal door. It's not even flat but an angled blade to make it both easier to close and easier to pry out of the way.
@rrmordikay lol I'm not. Just stating how incredibly cheap it appeared when the handle was jostled. Metal lock boxes from Walmart have better build quality.
it's meant to appease safe storage laws. Or it's designed for Desert Eagles. 😃It's certainly not designed to keep your gun from being stolen. I'd love to see a pry bar used to pry it open. I bet it would be easy.
I like how when you checked to make sure it was locked you had to not pull to hard on the handle because you know you could have just pulled it off wihtout the prybar lol
@marsovac I have a theory. In English "should have" is pronounced like "shoot(h)av(e)". Therefore, if someone never reads books he just hears "should of". Does that sound reasonable?
I'm not any expert in security whatsoever, so i often see some quite impressive vulnerabilities that I never could've guessed. And sometimes I see stuff like that.
This is the most savage I’ve ever heard LPL be to a lock manufacturer If LPL kept his cool through the awful locks we’ve seen on the channel before, Toriexon should be deeply, deeply ashamed of themselves. To get this reaction, they’ve fallen far below even Masterlock.
I think it's especially strongly worded because the exact flaw here is so severe given it's intended use. A cheaply made lock will perform its function of detterence adequately, but this 'safe' probably wouldn't adequately deter a toddler, and you're supposed to be able to keep a deadly weapon inside. As much as I get that adult americans have a right to bare arms, this probably shouldn't be extended to curious 3 year olds.
LPL is an avid gun enthusiast (check out some of his & B Bill's shooting videos?) AND an avid Gun Safety advocate... His rips on gun securement products are heartfelt IMO... (Comes from having children in the household, I suspect...)
I'm pretty sure he's at his angriest when bad security design leads to people getting access to guns that shouldn't. Stealing a bike or breaking into a shed is one thing, but accessing a firearm is incredibly dangerous.
Master makes locks for mass market, that if they were not branded as high security, serve most people’s purposes. This a “safe” for a deadly weapon so that only the intended person can open it, and the handle is what you just saw. Not only is the hole big, but the handle comes off with next to no effort. Gun locks should be high security baseline, most aren’t, and this is an utter failure.
That flaw is almost better than what I thought it was based on the thumbnail. I thought that hole was where the gun got locked in place for quick access, but with the trigger and magazine unprotected could fire while it was locked in that position.
@@aliciacarr9014 What if the gun just shrunk due to cold temperature? Huh, didn't think of that, huh! Of course, I'm just joking. I mean, a gun would shrink in cold (and expand in hot) rooms, but that would be at such a minimal scale that it wouldn't affect any everyday situation.
In general, when LPL doesn't show something twice, it's either that it's trivial that it's a glaring flaw or it's trivial that it's not easy. The latter is exceptionally rare.
Absolutely. Not only is it harder to open those blister packs, I'm willing to bet you could use one of those to open this "safe". The prybar was overkill so he could show us his product (and he's already used everything from a drink can to packaging to a binder and even a lego man).
I still remember seeing at Walmart a tool designed to open blister packs. I am sure you can correctly guess how the company packaged the tool. That's right, a blister pack.
@@kbramlett6877 If I were the marketing people for that tool I would have made sure it was the hardest blister pack ever to open. and it would have said, "This is the last time you will have to deal with this." on the package.
Once again we lost good bite of lockpicking thanks to capable engineers. Truly unpickable safe they got there... since we dont have to even try to pick it...
In the UK it is a legal requirement to store firearms in a safe that has been tested to BS7558 which details how long it must withstand an attack with certain tools. Generally it must withstand 2 separate 5 minute attacks with common hand tools such as a club hammer and cold chisel. The second attack utilises knowledge of any weak spots identified in the first attack. All this to say, I don't think this passes.....
that's the harshest you'll hear from him, a man who's seen a lot, faulty locks, ridiculous exploits, excuses from lock and safe manufacturers, people challenging him to open locks and giving him more time than he needs, people sending hin lingerie for his wife, people sending him (a lawyer) stolen property, and so on, and so to hear him utter such a crushing line such as that is an indication that you're in rock bottom's basement, there's only upwards to go from there
I love that LPL took more time to introduce the gun he was using than it took to open the safe. - The level of care is reflected in the scathing review and that's what I appreciates about him.
thief 1: “there’s a hole in the safe, reach in and take what’s inside!” thief 2: “that’s too stupid to be anything but a trap. let’s move on” designer: *success*
@@swapnilmankame If your kids are young enough that they can't be taught gun safety, I'd say leaving them home alone hopefully ends with you in prison. If they are old enough and you just didn't teach them, you're not being a responsible parent nor gun owner in the first place and have bigger problems.
not just any access hole. one you will find as soon as you tug on the locked drawer hard enough like an angry child would think they can break the mechanism turns out they find a solution doing this that is way better it str8 up lets them pull out whatever is inside as if it were an intended feature
I agree the flaw probably is intentional, and I think this is an issue with a few other gun safes you've demoed. The aim isn't to protect the gun. It's for compliance, in jurisdictions where the law requires that guns be stored securely in a locked gun safe. That's fine for sporting or hunting guns, but people who own guns for self-defence reasons have an obvious problem: When there's an intruder breaking into your home, you don't want to be fumbling with a combination lock in the dark. They want their gun stored loaded and ready to grab at a moment's notice. So they look for these deliberately insecure safes - ones they know they will be able to open with a whack in the right place, even with the lights off and head foggy from interrupted sleep. As the gun enthusiasts like to say: "When seconds count, the police are only minutes away."
Thanks LPL, I didn't see a problem with this design, went and got myself checked for a traumatic brain injury as you've suggested, and managed to catch it early enough that I can still get it treated. Saving lives in more ways than one.
I thought it would be something where their fingerprint reader would just read any warmish thing. I didn't realize that they LITERALLY CUT OUT THEIR DOOR LMAO 💀
As an observer, it is easy to consider a certain product as the product of a certain virtual person who came up with everything alone and attribute all the mistakes and miscalculations to him, and wonder how such people can exist. But most of these stupidest mistakes are not the mistakes of individual people. This is a system error. If your company has well-established business processes, then one person draws what it looks like, another is tasked with designing, for example, a drawer, a third is tasked with designing a lock, and the interaction between all of them is deeply optimized. When people serve as such cogs in a company for a long time, over time they think less and less about what they are doing. I know from the example of our company that things can reach complete absurdity. Despite the fact that the purpose of building the system was to avoid the mistakes of individual people that happened before, it turned out that responsibility was diffused and not individual people are responsible for things, but a system that may “fail” in some cases. There is an obvious case where the system did not work.
![[1591] The Replicant: Pocket Key Casting Perfected!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/L5Fus7qbRZM/mqdefault.jpg)
![[1591] The Replicant: Pocket Key Casting Perfected!](/img/tr.png)
![[1595] Sentry Safe’s Lock Design Malpractice](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/aZUDFrqOSvM/mqdefault.jpg)
![[1593] NYPD Advertising For Kryptonite… Kinda.](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/7mSB83U3Yck/mqdefault.jpg)
![ПОЛНАЯ ИСТОРИЯ ЭКЗОРЦИЗМА [Топ Сикрет]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/qBySr6Bt0B8/mqdefault.jpg)
![[1453] VERY Clever “Loki” Puzzle Padlock Solved](/img/n.gif)
From the intro, i was expecting dumb. But i still wasn't prepared for "Gun sized hole in the front of the gun safe"
It was his comment on the size of the gun that clued me in.
@@jamespryor5967my hind brain clued in at that point but my front brain wouldn't believe it!😅
You must have got a different thumbnail, the one I saw showed the gun coming out the hole.
@@nope.0. apparently I'm not very observant!🤣
Someone trying the safe would have to find the flaw first and who's going to just yank a handle? Oh, crap
"This is a gun. Can you guess which hole that goes through? That's right! It goes in the square hole."
This is the reason kids need that kind of toy when growing up.
Criminally underrated joke. Or it's just me, loving that vine.
@@johnnythespent5660 Nope that video is gold. Even tho i only use UA-cam, it is here aswell. Both versions. Good acting only sell it more.
That was not a square hole
@@EGL24Xxmissed the joke.
@@kutter_ttl6786 Well aware of the joke, just pointing something out
On the plus side, it took him longer to get the gun out than it takes to open most Master Locks.
Thats because he likes us to see whats going on. He has Mcnally for speed runs.
not sure why he bothered with the prybar. one good yank on the handle would have popped it off.
It took longer to fish the gun out of the box than it did to actually open the thing
@@Nathan-dt2tu He didn't want to chip his nails on this crapy safe.
@@walizeeshan3292 Only because he didn't want to scratch the gun!
“It’s hard for me to imagine a sentient being that’s both this dumb, and still breathing”
The Lock Picking Lawyer never disappoints! 🤣
also apparently does not get out in public much.. I am blown away every single day that we humans can be as dumb as we often are
Yup, and thankfully for him he doesn't interact with any of the MAGA crowd.
i misunderstood it for "breeding"
like its darwins fault
LPL has never worked under a Manager, attended a job interview, or rented an apartment.
Landlord: "The only way you'll get your security deposit back is to prove you never entered your apartment!"
Manager: "I had to let everyone else go. You'll have to do all their work without a raise. Just be grateful you still have a job!"
Interviewer: "This is an Entry Level position. You need at least 5 years of experience!"
This is the first time LPL had used such strong wording. I never expected this!
My toddler came out as trans.
I believe, that as a Lawyer, he knows when he can insult someone and be sure he can prove in court, that it was not an insult, just a statement of a fact 🤣
Brutal
Yeah he's legitimately mad about this one and righty so, the purpose of this safe is too important to be this flawed, and it made it past WAY too many people for this company to be taken seriously when it comes to firearm security.
Someone breaking into your shed is all fun and games but with gun safety, things get serious for him.
Rarely see LPL call something straight stupid. RIP this company
The company likely doesn't care. This thing is mass produced in a Chinese factory, and probably sold under a dozen or more different brands.
@@TexDrinkwater care or not, at the very least several million people will know not to buy this particular piece of shit lol.
As far as I know, gun safes are mostly a scam, because more often than not they're just used as a pretext for the owner to avoid accountability in case something goes wrong. They mainly serve as an excuse for the gun owners, in case the weapon gets stolen or misused for something sinister, to claim they had duly stored the weapon in a safe. The actual security of said safe is of no concern in the matter.
@@TheSmokePope You only calling particular product a piece of shit, I would also say this particular product made by piece of shits.
People who make terrible designed products are piece of shits
you must not watch many LPL videos
"It is legitimately hard for me to imagine a sentient being who is both THIS dumb and still breathing"
LPL clearly doesn't spend much time on twitter
True
Or reddit. And can't possibly ever read his comments. Good for him.
UA-cam commenters throwing shade at other communities is like a monkey flinging its own feces.
You seem to have it mixed up, Twitter users aren't sentient, that implies consciousness and awareness of your surroundings, as well of your own existence and the implications that come with it
This rings more true every day
I burst out laughing at this! I was expecting some weird outrageous flaw in the lock, not a complete fail in the security of the safe itself!
Ah yes, nothing says lockpicking like a small crowbar.
Well done for not saying 'bursted'
I work in IT, and my co-workers and I often talk to clients about the dangers of outdated security practices and technologies. One of our favorite analogies when it comes to demonstrating how broken security can be worse than no security at all is to say something along the lines of, "you've been dutifully locking the door every day but ignoring the gaping hole in the middle of it."
I never thought I would see such a perfectly-designed real-life example of the concept.
So true. I am going to use this as an example to help explain bad security products.
@@-_.._._--_.-.-_-_-_-...-.- so... It ended up being a good for something product...
I work in IT and have used almost the same analogy. Mine is usually along the lines of "as secure as a lock on a screen door".
Now you got the perfect analogy *AND* the perfect example, buy that baby for 70$ and show that shit off to future clients lmfao
The locked gate securing precious kiddos can be defeated with a piece of string or a Skinny Guy(tm) like me (6'5" 260lbs) squeezing through the gap .
It's all security theater.
LPL: ... a full-sized handgun. That's important.
Me: What, does it not close properly -
LPL: _reaches his entire hand into the massive hole_
Me: _Oh no._
Me: hmmm why is he highlighting the gun being large? I wonder does it stop the drawer closing properly and not licking, does it interfere with the mechanism. I notice it has a threaded barrel maybe that pokes onto the latch….. oh even though it’s a big gun you can just pull it out, wow
@@pj4433 Yeah I was wondering too if the gun would prevent proper locking due being too big, nope it seems the makes of this "safe" just forgot that having a big hole in the door kind of makes it useless, even doors with windows on them (or metal framed glass doors) have glass covering up the holes in them.
Sounds like the makings of a script for the Valentine's day episode...
@@daliasprints9798The bigger thr gun, uh... 🤔
Exactly my thought I was expecting the safe just doesn’t fit, didn’t expect the big hole
Wish my uncle were still alive, I'd show this to him lol. He was always talking about how gun safety was a big priority, but then bought the absolute stupidest crap to "secure" his guns. As he was bragging about his new gun safe, I picked the cylinder lock using the edge of a strip of small staples as a tension wrench, and set the pins with a tack. As he's going on and on about how I'm wasting my time and I'll never get it open, it opens.
With enough time, patience, and spite any gun safe can be opened. :P
@@christopherrogers532some are much easier than others though
Maybe your uncle recognized the difference between gun safety and dangerous government mandated bullshit.
This is like making sure to lock all the doors of your house but leaving the first floor window open.
More like thinking glass windows somehow make your house secure.
I think its more like locking your window and leaving the front door open 😂
More like locking the door, but the door hinge isn't connected to anything.
Getting a negative superlative from LLL is quite an achievement!
Edit: "LLL" was a typo, but I'm going with "Lock Licking Lawyer" suggested below.
Lock licking lawyer
LLL - Lock Licking Lawyer?
@@Kenny__UKI thought that
@@Kenny__UKnah Lilly's little lamb
@@Kenny__UK @BigArmBoss There's a not-oft-used / older slang sense of "to lick" which means "to (soundly) defeat", so it could work. Not sure LPL will be adopting it any time soon though.
What’s sad is they could have saved money on manufacturing by not cutting out that hole and just install a knob 😅
Lol! Focus on the "drawer" with none of the "security" aspect.
Honestly this seems like they tried that and the knob/digital panel/fingerprint scanner manufacturer fell through. They could at least JB Weld in the panel through, for goodness' sake
it's probably a normal drawer retrofit with a lock so it's actually cheaper using the existing tooling
The knobs all work in the design department…
@@OdiumTV This was my first thought too...the drawer was probably straight out of a small cabinet or something and they just replaced the lock mechanism with a fingerprint lock.
"We need a simple fail-safe in case of emergency or power loss. BUT it needs to be cheap as well."
Insert concealed big hole 🐺🔧
I like to think this was intentionally made for those places that are, by law or something, required to have a "safe" but don't actually want the gun to be locked.
It's not a flaw, it's the backup access feature for when you accidentally left your finger at home.
good one. I laughed out loud
It's a Backdoor for the FBI and ATF
😂😂😂
No fingers? No problem! 🤣
Its amusing the reviews the safe currently has are mostly complaining how fast the keypad batteries die. None of them have figured out the handy backup opening hatch yet, lol
You know it's bad when he doesn't even try the lock.
Why bother when someone has already cut it open for you
*Stage of LPL Approval:*
(Stage 1) Just use fork, astronaut lego, spoon or mini plastic crowbar to open
(Stage 2) Jiggler
(Stage 3) Simple lockpick
(Stage 4) Might contain fake pins or serrated pins
(Stage 5) ''LPL Recommends that Product''
(Final Stage) Stuff Lock / Puzzle Lock
Don't need to pick the lock on the front door when it's hanging wide open.
@@deanospimoniful given how much of the hand went in you could probably 'pick' the lock from the back.
Now im wondering just how good the actual lock is... Maybe the hole can be welded shut and the safe used after all
I came fully prepared for something so dumb but I wasn't prepared for this kind of dumb 😂
i'm nearly speechless. I was actually thinking "I bet the weight of the 'full sized' handgun causes it to pop open when mounted under the desk", but this. Bloody hell.
LPL takes gun safety very seriously, and I'm all for it. Thank you for shaming and sharing.
yeah, I thought it was hyperbole, and then I saw it. FFS. That's dumb!
@@jbphilly1234 literally nobody said that, just said that the gun should be readily available to the owner, not kids dumbass.
@@JamesSullivan-ru4opu guys could address the problems that lead you to the feel of needing guns in the first place.
They are not the solution, just a patch keeping you from solving the real problems
@@TheDasHatti But until the problem is solved? Here in norway, no reason for carrying a gun, if I lived in the US, ccw all the way.
@@TheDasHatti you going to get rid of sharp and heavy objects, cars? Also the 2nd Amendment was to uphold the constitution. The reality of the world is there is no fix, protect yourself or don't, it's up to you.
Remember, if you ever say "Nobody could be that stupid" the universe takes it as a challenge.
I live by my motto - "never underestimate the power of stupid, it can affect anyone at anytime"
26 years in emergency services and I agree.
"If you make something idiot-proof, they'll just make a better idiot."
and every time the universe stands zero chance against the human race... we're the only species that silences the universe because of sheer shock
@@K4RN4GE911 I always say when someone calls something idiot-proof, the universe takes offense to that and goes out of it's way to prove them wrong.
This is why channels like this are so friggen important. To show how many companies rip people off with cheaply made garbage. This company should be embarassed if they don’t know and if they did know then that’s just criminal
"Look, it's in a government recognized safe and I can still use it." Where's the rip off?
@@petermgruhn Umm because when someone spends money on a “Gun safe” they usually want their gun to be safe. Please tell me your comment was sarcasm. Please.
Your video caught my attention, and I love the way you present ideas. It’s clear you put effort into your content. Excited to see what else your channel has in store!
Im into safe humiliation and this channel never disappoints.
woah! youre like me but blue!
@@repentandbelieveinJesusChrist1repent to allah, not his prophet jesus, that’s a mistake.
@@Sans_The_SkeletonSans not rockin’ with JESUS⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️
@@ThePhrog714 hey papyrus, bro, i believe in islam now bro!
@@ThePhrog714 I’m just meming around
I was expecting him to reach in, push down the lever and open the "safe". I was not expecting the whole gun to fit through the hole 😂😂
Same, the idea to fit such enormous hole into "safe" is beyond my imagination.
Just look at it. Hole in a safe. Like you even come up with this?
Same
I was looking at the door when he jiggled it and thinking "he's just gonna give the door a good pull and the lock will fail", can't believe the actual failure point was even dumber.
I was, but only because he made a point of the size of the handgun.
I know!! I was gonna say, "can we even really call it a safe"? 😶
1:03 I have to note as well, there's a lot of wiggle room in this thing. You want a locked box to be a solid block with seemingly no way to pry it open. Not something you can destroy with the back end of a nail hammer.
Or a butter knife!
There is an old Andy Griffith show where the bank robbers crack the safe. Sherriff Andy is really happy because the bank lost the combination ago so they just cut a back door into the safe.
I think that show's writer designed this safe.
LPL: "Its main flaw has to be intentional"
Safe Designer: "Hooray! As promised we have made it into the Lockpicking Lawyer's YT channel"
Safe designer then gets told they probably have brain damage 😂😂
“Jeffrey, you’re fired”
😂☠️💀
So this won’t be on sale for $70 anymore?
@@cyberpunk.386 Right. They're updating the listing to sell for $200, "featured on Lock Picking Lawyer!"
"it is legitimately hard for me to imagine a sentient being who is both this dumb and still breathing"
me every day working retail
You think that every day? You sound like a lovely person.
@@antoniodominguezjr4734says the one who clearly hasn't worked retail.
@@RainbowDashShadesOfApproval ah, the classic justification to oneself for being ignorant and condescending.
@antoniodominguezjr4734 you really haven't been around people in general have you? Cause if you do, you'll meet and see some dumb motherfuckers. Hell, just a couple weeks ago, I saw some dude walk out of their car into the middle of the highway. Their car was broken down in the middle lane. Literally so dumb you don't know how they're breathing. It's inevitable when you go online or go outside that you'll see dumb.
@@antoniodominguezjr4734Karen mode activated 😎
For when you want it to look safe if an inspector comes, but also need fast, discreet access because there’s a reason you keep it hidden under your desk at work. 😅
Ive never before heard someone say something so disrespectful while sounding like the most polite man ever
The person who designed this probably tried to put square blocks into round holes as a toddler.
as an adult*
That’s right it goes into the square hole
Everything fits in the square hole
@@comradesam975😂... Beat me to it
All of the blocks will fit in the square hole
LockPickingLawyer: "It is legitimately hard for me to imagine a sentient being that is this dumb and still breathing."
Me: "I take it you haven't met my coworkers."
I feel your pain. I can raise you "State Government" employees.
Last week my coworker asked for help, she was trying to add a new thing to the website, ignored all obvious ways to do so(like manage pages/routes) and instead wound up in the configuration changing random values.
We had to roll back the changes because she'd broken so much.
After telling her not to change it again and showing her the right area she claimed she understood and went back to her desk.
10 minutes later the site was down again after she changed the config again.
I sat next to her and told her exactly what to do step by step, the number of times I had to tell her to stop or no because she started going off trying to change random things or clicking random buttons had me dreading today.
Some people are just dangerously incompetent and yet somehow still find work.
You work at Toriexon?
🤭🤭😅😂🤣🤣
That's pronounced cow-orkers.
I heard "... and still breeding" which is a scary thought in itself.
I saw the front and thought... Cost cutting into functionality. The plastic handle even looks cheap.
I get a deja vu on this one.
The casing looks so flexible (like cheap desktop PC case metal) that I'm sure you could just insert a pry bar into the top and flex the top edge to clear the latch anyway. Amazing.
My experience with engineers: the handle was originally steel with locking tabs only accessible on the inside.
My experience with management: an off the shelf plastic handle is cheaper, so will save money and sell more units.
Design by committee be like:
Checks out.
"Sir, the safe design is tested and this thing is airtight!"
"Great, how can we cut corners?"
"On a device designed to secure a lethal firearm, sir!?"
"CUT. THE. CORNERS!"
I think you hit the Nail on the Head. 95% sure that's more or less how it went.
Yup. Profit above all else
@@linksbetweendrinks7032*literally cuts the corners off with a angle grinder* there you go sir. Better?
I'm suddenly starting to believe all the people who say their guns were locked up when someone got their hands on it
The purpose of this safe is likely not to secure guns but to satisfy the legal requirement of having a gun "secured."
More likely it's made by some Chinese company that just wants to sell products to people who search for " gun safe" on Amazon.
@@thexanderthemander might work in some places in the US, but definitely not in Canada. Even if you use a bank-quality safe you can still be charged for not having your firearms secured if someone gets their hands on them due to poor planning on your part. Eg. Going out of town for a week and leaving your house unmonitored. Our instructor had a massive gun collection and one of his friends was also a collector, and went on vacation. Thieves broke into his house and spent a couple of days getting into his gun room. He was charged for not properly securing his firearms when he reported it because it was known he had guns, so anyone knowing he was away had the time to go after them.
@@cannibalholiday Canada is ridiculous these days. Like the two guys who got arrested on a train for talking to each other and someone got offended and told the police.
@@zetsumeinaito At least we don't execute people during traffic stops, have a Constitution-Free Zone, and draconic drug laws.
Your videos are superb; and your knowledge in this field is purely fascinating.
I managed to open my safe (when keys were lost), simply from watching your videos.
This reminds me of one time when I was a kid. I put some money in a zipper pouch and then put a lock on it. I then showed my mom that my money was safe. She then quickly showed me that the zipper could still be opened because I locked the tips of the zipper tabs and the pouch was made of fabric. That's why I didn't go into gun safe building.
That's the flaw in most locks. If your typical thief encountered the best door that LPL has ever reviewed obstructing the door to their desired loot, they wouldn't spend an hour with picks or walk away in frustration. They'd go looking for a window to break. The good news for the lock-owner is that the thief might decide burgling the house next door is easier.
This is the best day ever for Masterlock. They are officially promoted to 2nd place, while Toriexon takes the prize.
😂😂😂
I'm tempted I find out if Master Lock owns that name... haha
both losers won today !!!
Don't confuse 2nd place with 2nd to last
LPL is almost always perfectly even-toned, so hearing the slight hint of a laugh when he pulls the gun out is *really* telling
RIGHT??
I really have to imagine there are a number of bloopers to get that scene right. LPL could be superhuman in regards to getting things correct on the first try but my god is this something that is an extra level of creating a new idiot.
I think the tone was more aggravated than humorous.
Nice pfp.
That moment when a safe is so bad it's cracked without even bothering with the locking mechanism
The only thing I can think of as a reason would be that the point of an under desk safe isn't to keep the gun hyper secure, its to keep it available while you are at the desk but secure enough from kids or common foot traffic wherever you are. Its supposed to be 1 step up from just having it in a regular desk drawer.
The access in the front could be a fail safe if the electronic lock were to ever malfunction, if someone desires access over security. The handle would be hiding it from kids or any office foot traffic that would ever look at it.
Thats all I've got as even a posssible idea here....
Next up: this $999 Military grade gun safe ismade out of gingerbread and can be dissolved completely with warm milk
But where can we get warm milk??
as a former military guy, anything "military grade" to screams C- on the best of days
With a covert instruments warm milk spreader that he and Bosnian Bill workshopped.
Military grade = minimum standard quality that is still available for mass production
@@antiyouthie 100% agree, military grade just means lowest bidder who meets minimum specs. And those minimum specs usually are lower than one might expect.
The best part is that this might well happen with the first thing someone does to try to get a locked drawer open. Pull hard on the handle, * pop *, “Well that was easier than expected”
bump!
Exactly! Even a toddler would figure this out too by accident.
This was exactly what I was thinking.
Even with the thumbnail, I wasn't ready for this. 😅
Just checked on Amazon, it is still on sale, only one buyer comments the flaw. Really incredible. Thanks, LPL, excellent info, as usual
This was the first time that even the LPL couldn't hold back his emotions by that amount of stupidity
Oh come on. This is just a back door in case you forgot your fingerprint.
@@kekistaniattackhelicopter2242more like a front door with a bead curtain
Engineers: Y'all know what this gun safe needs? A gun sized hole in the door!
QA testers: Looks good to me!
What QA testers, I bet this went straight from design to production, hell a prototype probably never existed
@@huntedperson3147 or they slapped an existing lock on an already made drawer with that massive hole inside. You just write to the contract in China and they make sure to ask "you want item X put on item Y right", yep just do that, I want 1000 of them. "Okay boss."
Management shot the engineers and went into production...
Who needs QA? It looks good, ship it!
Looks to me that they were thinking about making the safe easier to manufacture and completely forgot that would inherently make it easier to disassemble.
The real terrifying part would be someone not knowing this, put this in a home and their kid manages to get the handgun out and...
You can see how the rest would go on.
It’s NRA-approved 😉
#1. Excellent choice of a gun. #2. Sweet little pry-bar. #3. Funniest script ever.
LPL has been humiliating MasterLock for years... so today when he says "Nobody could be that stupid", this can be taken as the highest level of insult!
Master Lock just went "Thank God we didn't have anything to do with this!"
@@carlbruschnigjr1757you sure? I would think they are thinking how can we relabel this so we can get our number one spot back.
That stood out to me as well. LPL directly calling the designer "dumb" I was a bit shocked, but he wasn't wrong, that design was horrible.
@@funfromabove9728 Indeed, and "dumb" might well be an understatement!
They could easily fix that by putting a “warrant void if removed” sticker on that handle
Covering over the hole with Warranty Void if Removed stickers instead of the handle might be more secure.
Or some hot glue or epoxy or any sort of adhesive to keep the handle on
Just make it illegal to remove the handle and... problem solved!
@@TonyHammitt I mean the real way would be to add metal boxing around the handle. Not amazingly secure but definitely better than a gaping hole 🤣
More like, not responsible for items stored inside sticker !
I was expecting a fail…I wasn’t expecting this one to be so gargantuan-
Genuinely baffled by this. Had no idea where he was going then I saw what it was and my brain for a second.
I saw one of these in a law office recently. The guys biggest complaint was that the plastic handle kept coming out when he pulled on it too hard.
Was that their COMPLAIN!? 😂
@@MrLind87 Well, they dont really need them, it is just some stupid requirement that no one cares about most likely. So they get cheapest crap they could find.
If that was their complaint, they shouldn't be armed or a lawyer.
Complaint? More like product has failed completely
And I can see the design team trying to argue "But you would have to KNOW the handle comes off" (Then proceeds to shut the drawer and the handle just falls off).
"Just ignore that"
Design team was probably 100% against the idea, but project management saw a "cost savings."
"The front fell off"
@@Jarls I'm not saying it isn't safe; it's just perhaps not quite as safe as some of the other ones.
When I saw the cover image, I was thinking you were nitpicking over the designer not securing the trigger from accidental discharge. I thought the gun was locked inside the hole intentionally.
WOW was I wrong. That's impressive.
That material on the number code thing looks like it could easily get fingerprints on it showing the combo
The worst thing about this is that someone trying to pull it open by force will automatically rip open the plastic thingy and get easy access to the gun inside.
It's crazy, merely pulling on the handle will defeat the gun safe. What the hell.
Yea - definitely - first thing a thief would probably try to do is grab the handle and give it a yank and the handle just pops off revealing a big hole. Course even if not for that flaw it looks really easy to pry open with a crowbar - which is probably the next thing a thief would do.
@@bubba99009you can see how thin that sheet metal is, you could turn it to shreds in a second
@@bubba99009 I saw a pretty significant gap open by just him lightly pulling the handle. I can't imagine how easy it would be to break open by just pulling at full force. You could either just pull it open or pry the metal back with little effort without ever knowing about the handle vulnerability. This thing is a real piece of crap.
And it sells for $130!
I was expecting him to just pop the drawer open by pulling on it with his hand. The handle coming off from pulling on it was second on the list. I'm actually a little disappointed that he used a crowbar.
I think this is the most derisive I've seen LPL, and I'm here for it. Gun safety is important.
He gets mad everytime he brings a gun safe onto the channel. He takes firearm safety very serious and I love it.
Yeah. That was straight-up vicious.
There was just a story in the news about a toddler accidentally shooting another toddler. Gun safety is the biggest factor with owning a gun and so many people either do not lock up their guns or they do it poorly. A product like this could so easily be circumvented by a child, for example, and the design being intended for under a desk means it's potentially easily within reach of children.
eh, it wasnt as bad as his reviews on masterlock
@@HumanPerson_finalsay what you will about Australian gun laws, but the fact that owners are required to install a heavy duty gun safe before they’re allowed to buy a gun really goes a long way to preventing accidents like this.
I mean, the beep would alert someone that you're taking the gun out from under the desk. This design feature allows you to remove it discreetly.
Wow, this is seriously worthy of a safety-related full product recall!!!
Wow this might be the worst ive seen LPL insult a product and designer.
I wouldn’t call it „insult“.
We‘re taking about a gun save. Each toddler can get a gun out of this un-safe. Imagine a 3 year old take a gun out of this save…trigger…
His insulting words are beaten, by far, with the video he showed with them. You can mute the sound, and it will still be an insult to the product designer.
You are being generous in calling this metallic turd a “product”, that was “designed”...it was simply excreted.
@@petergrunendahl8799 to add insult to murder, a child will likely find it easier. children have smaller hands.
Unfortunately you are absolutely right.
Imagine your coming home, expecting a kiss from wife and „baby“…open the door…your toddler is standing with a gun in her hand and your wife has a big hole in her head.
You will complain yourself the rest of your life: Why I bought this „safe“.
That handle design is used on quite a few drawers, filing cabinets etc. In my experience after opening it a few times, you might ACCIDENTALLY break into it.
Now imagine if the door is locked closed so you pull on it to try and open it and… I’m sure you get what just might happen.
yeah lol, that handle looks super cheap
I thought it was a door that you pull the gun from with an internal locking mechanism
For a device with such high liability implications as a gun safe, you'd think they'd contract a penetration tester to find such flaws.
I feel like it would have been more secure if you put the gun inside 2 Ziplock 1 Gallon Freezer bags, and then used Scotch Tape to afix it to the underside of the desk. It would legitimately take you longer to open that way...
LOL. Classic zing.
Yes, I literally have more trouble opening the packing tape wrapped packages I get from China with my cheap crap from Temu.
yes of course, but this safe are for people who can't afford the duck tape and the freezer bag
@@manstersr omfg yes... why do they need to use an entire roll of tape?
You raise a valid point 😂
Based on the amount of play on the closed drawer when it was being jostled, I'd say there are a few more very easy ways to bypass this locking system.
Probably use that same tool to bend down the front panel a bit to bypass the latch.
You could probably brute force the draw open with a fork if you wanted
any flat instrument would bypass the locking arm just like on a normal door. It's not even flat but an angled blade to make it both easier to close and easier to pry out of the way.
Why are you looking for other ways to open it ? It has a HANDGUN SIZED HOLE in the front. There is no need to keep looking.
@rrmordikay lol I'm not. Just stating how incredibly cheap it appeared when the handle was jostled. Metal lock boxes from Walmart have better build quality.
This is the sort of jank you'd see in daytime TV crime drama's. Ill make extra sure to keep an eye out to stop those bad boys up on the silver screen.
it's meant to appease safe storage laws. Or it's designed for Desert Eagles. 😃It's certainly not designed to keep your gun from being stolen. I'd love to see a pry bar used to pry it open. I bet it would be easy.
I like how when you checked to make sure it was locked you had to not pull to hard on the handle because you know you could have just pulled it off wihtout the prybar lol
He literally should of just did that!!!! 😂
@@UA-camsucks.. That would have been amazing! lol
@@UA-camsucks..should have. Not "should of". In fact "should of" is never correct. It is used only by those that are uneducated
@marsovac I have a theory. In English "should have" is pronounced like "shoot(h)av(e)". Therefore, if someone never reads books he just hears "should of".
Does that sound reasonable?
@@marsovac🤡🤓
I saw the bolt go up before closing and immediately thought “Here comes the magnet” before the mental flash bang of product design came strolling by
My first thought was just to steal the table or prying the drawer open. I would have never of thought of prying the handle off.
I'm not any expert in security whatsoever, so i often see some quite impressive vulnerabilities that I never could've guessed.
And sometimes I see stuff like that.
I expected dumb but I wasn’t prepared for that level.
This is the most savage I’ve ever heard LPL be to a lock manufacturer
If LPL kept his cool through the awful locks we’ve seen on the channel before, Toriexon should be deeply, deeply ashamed of themselves. To get this reaction, they’ve fallen far below even Masterlock.
Yeah, at least Masterlocks often require AT LEAST another Masterlock to open. This could've been opened with a folded over soda can sheet metal piece.
@@Mrminesheeps Maybe even a napkin and a paperclip.
I think it's especially strongly worded because the exact flaw here is so severe given it's intended use. A cheaply made lock will perform its function of detterence adequately, but this 'safe' probably wouldn't adequately deter a toddler, and you're supposed to be able to keep a deadly weapon inside. As much as I get that adult americans have a right to bare arms, this probably shouldn't be extended to curious 3 year olds.
That's one of his big consistencies--he takes gun safety very seriously, and you see language like this from him in many of his gun lock videos.
LPL is an avid gun enthusiast (check out some of his & B Bill's shooting videos?) AND an avid Gun Safety advocate...
His rips on gun securement products are heartfelt IMO... (Comes from having children in the household, I suspect...)
That is the harshest he has ever been. You know there are people who work at Master who are like, "Damn, I'm glad we never pissed him off like that."
I'm pretty sure he's at his angriest when bad security design leads to people getting access to guns that shouldn't. Stealing a bike or breaking into a shed is one thing, but accessing a firearm is incredibly dangerous.
@@andrewphilos maybe we should all be grateful that Master never made a gun safe.
Did you see the one he used a Lego to unlock?
Master makes locks for mass market, that if they were not branded as high security, serve most people’s purposes. This a “safe” for a deadly weapon so that only the intended person can open it, and the handle is what you just saw. Not only is the hole big, but the handle comes off with next to no effort. Gun locks should be high security baseline, most aren’t, and this is an utter failure.
@@psugab if I remember, that was a trigger lock
This have to be now my new number one on the dumbest stuff sold at Amazon.
That flaw is almost better than what I thought it was based on the thumbnail. I thought that hole was where the gun got locked in place for quick access, but with the trigger and magazine unprotected could fire while it was locked in that position.
"It is legitimately hard for me to imagine a sentient being who is both this dumb, and still breathing" 🤣🤣🤣 LPL with the zinger!
Lol I thought he said ", and still breeding"
Hey that had to go through a whole bunch of approvals to get to market. And if purchased from a shop a whole different group again.
@@samuel2291 the problem is that they probably are…
Edit: which makes me fear for the future of humanity.
I've never seen LPL be so scathing before. 😮😮😮
He's damn right angry at this manufacturer!
You know something is really bad when he doesn't try it a second time to make sure it was not a fluke
I’m curious how ‘the handle comes off leaving a hole big enough for the entire gun to fit through’ could possibly be a fluke…
@@aliciacarr9014 What if the gun just shrunk due to cold temperature? Huh, didn't think of that, huh!
Of course, I'm just joking. I mean, a gun would shrink in cold (and expand in hot) rooms, but that would be at such a minimal scale that it wouldn't affect any everyday situation.
@@kikixchannel and let's try another joke to make sure that was not a fluke
In general, when LPL doesn't show something twice, it's either that it's trivial that it's a glaring flaw or it's trivial that it's not easy.
The latter is exceptionally rare.
that would've been too brutal even for LPL.
This is like one of the best Amazon products I've seen in years
To be fair, this safe would probably keep people out who are as dumb or dumber than the designer itself...
With how easily you pulled the handle out with the pry bar you could probably do it almost as easily bare handed.
You would be risking breaking a nail. You better use a pry tool...
@@isaacclark9825😂 are you for real? Why would you be scared of breaking a nail while stealing a gun or in a situation that needs a gun?
Or just use a fork?
@@benedictjajohe was making a joke bro.
@@benedictjajobecause breaking a nail leaves DNA evidence.
Yet more proof that plastic blister packs are better security than most lockboxes/safes
Absolutely. Not only is it harder to open those blister packs, I'm willing to bet you could use one of those to open this "safe". The prybar was overkill so he could show us his product (and he's already used everything from a drink can to packaging to a binder and even a lego man).
I still remember seeing at Walmart a tool designed to open blister packs. I am sure you can correctly guess how the company packaged the tool. That's right, a blister pack.
@@kbramlett6877 Yeah, so you have to buy *two*.
@@kbramlett6877 If I were the marketing people for that tool I would have made sure it was the hardest blister pack ever to open. and it would have said, "This is the last time you will have to deal with this." on the package.
@@kbramlett6877reminds me of the time when I bought a new pocket knife and couldn't get it out of the packaging 😂
Once again we lost good bite of lockpicking thanks to capable engineers. Truly unpickable safe they got there... since we dont have to even try to pick it...
In the UK it is a legal requirement to store firearms in a safe that has been tested to BS7558 which details how long it must withstand an attack with certain tools. Generally it must withstand 2 separate 5 minute attacks with common hand tools such as a club hammer and cold chisel.
The second attack utilises knowledge of any weak spots identified in the first attack.
All this to say, I don't think this passes.....
“It’s hard to me to imagine a sentient being who’s both this dumb and still breathing”
is my new favorite quote
I heard a similar one a bit ago: "How did you make it to adulthood without swallowing your tongue!?"
that's the harshest you'll hear from him, a man who's seen a lot, faulty locks, ridiculous exploits, excuses from lock and safe manufacturers, people challenging him to open locks and giving him more time than he needs, people sending hin lingerie for his wife, people sending him (a lawyer) stolen property, and so on, and so to hear him utter such a crushing line such as that is an indication that you're in rock bottom's basement, there's only upwards to go from there
I love that LPL took more time to introduce the gun he was using than it took to open the safe. - The level of care is reflected in the scathing review and that's what I appreciates about him.
Is that what you appreciates about him, Mazereaugh?
Take about 20% off there
I'm glad I am able to appreciate this perfect set of three comments once
@@adamj7198you really missed the opportunity to say "appreciates"
My wife said you’d probably be better off putting it in an old Spider-Man lunch box and letting him protect the weapon.
This is actually a smart move - if you lost your fingers and forgot the code, but urgently need access to a weapon, you can easily get your gun
Really!!! Explain to me How are you going to open that without having Fingers???
Let alone Use a Gun without Fingers Moron!🤦♂
thief 1: “there’s a hole in the safe, reach in and take what’s inside!”
thief 2: “that’s too stupid to be anything but a trap. let’s move on”
designer: *success*
it's not for thiefs, Gun safes are usually to protect against kids alone at home
Im 1000 percent confident a mildly curious toddler could get the gun from this safe.
@@swapnilmankame If your kids are young enough that they can't be taught gun safety, I'd say leaving them home alone hopefully ends with you in prison. If they are old enough and you just didn't teach them, you're not being a responsible parent nor gun owner in the first place and have bigger problems.
@@AParticularlyConcernedCitizen
some kids are mischievous ..its part of being a kid
@@swapnilmankame then the hole is even worse as they can reach right inside even easier than an adult just did.
I have never actually laughed in disbelief at an LPL video before. A safe with an access hole in it. 😂
not just any access hole. one you will find as soon as you tug on the locked drawer hard enough like an angry child would think they can break the mechanism
turns out they find a solution doing this that is way better
it str8 up lets them pull out whatever is inside as if it were an intended feature
Bro, I laughed so loud. Didn’t expect this at all
I agree the flaw probably is intentional, and I think this is an issue with a few other gun safes you've demoed. The aim isn't to protect the gun. It's for compliance, in jurisdictions where the law requires that guns be stored securely in a locked gun safe. That's fine for sporting or hunting guns, but people who own guns for self-defence reasons have an obvious problem: When there's an intruder breaking into your home, you don't want to be fumbling with a combination lock in the dark. They want their gun stored loaded and ready to grab at a moment's notice. So they look for these deliberately insecure safes - ones they know they will be able to open with a whack in the right place, even with the lights off and head foggy from interrupted sleep.
As the gun enthusiasts like to say: "When seconds count, the police are only minutes away."
Thanks LPL, I didn't see a problem with this design, went and got myself checked for a traumatic brain injury as you've suggested, and managed to catch it early enough that I can still get it treated. Saving lives in more ways than one.
Just remember - breath goes in, breath goes out, repeat!
;-)
I thought it would be something where their fingerprint reader would just read any warmish thing. I didn't realize that they LITERALLY CUT OUT THEIR DOOR LMAO 💀
As an observer, it is easy to consider a certain product as the product of a certain virtual person who came up with everything alone and attribute all the mistakes and miscalculations to him, and wonder how such people can exist.
But most of these stupidest mistakes are not the mistakes of individual people. This is a system error. If your company has well-established business processes, then one person draws what it looks like, another is tasked with designing, for example, a drawer, a third is tasked with designing a lock, and the interaction between all of them is deeply optimized. When people serve as such cogs in a company for a long time, over time they think less and less about what they are doing. I know from the example of our company that things can reach complete absurdity. Despite the fact that the purpose of building the system was to avoid the mistakes of individual people that happened before, it turned out that responsibility was diffused and not individual people are responsible for things, but a system that may “fail” in some cases. There is an obvious case where the system did not work.
Thats like locking the door next to a wide open window 🤣