DOG BITE OR TAILLIGHT? 1. The Commonwealth’s theory is that John’s arm was hit by Karen’s polycarbonate plastic taillight at 24 mph causing it to virtually explode resulting in the cuts to Johns right arm, also spreading across the Alberts lawn leaving a wide debris field of more than 47 pieces and shards of many shapes and sizes. 2. There are nine holes on the right arm of John’s sweatshirt, but there are 20 plus wounds on Johns right arm more than twice the number of wounds compared to the holes in the sweatshirt, that doesn’t happen with shards of exploding glass or plastic, you get one hole, one wound, matching like a bullet hole. 3. The nine holes on the right arm of John’s sweatshirt are all round/ oval, and about the thickness of a pencil 6 to 8mm in diameter. What are the chances that all these pieces of taillight of various shapes and sizes made these 9 almost identical size holes in the right sleeve of Johns sweatshirt? 4. If the wounds were from a broken taillight shard, there would be a square/rectangular hole in the sweatshirt and a square/rectangular wound on John’s arm matching the hole in the sweatshirt and the shard would most likely be still lodged in his arm just like any sharp projectile hitting your body, say shattering glass or a bullet. 5. The polycarbonate plastic in this case is about one eight of an inch in thickness about 3mm, shards from this taillight will not produce round holes, no matter if they are large or small, they will always produce rectangular shaped holes. Judging by the scale next to the largest hole in the sleeve of the sweatshirt it is no more than 10 mm in diameter. Logic will tell you that a shard no bigger than 10mm x 3mm would have passed through the sweatshirt. Most all the wounds are substantially larger than the holes in the sweatshirt. 6. All the holes show pulled fibres around the edges which tells us whatever made the holes was also removed from the holes, like a stab wound, or a dog bite. If Johns wounds had been caused by shards of taillight, we would expect to find at least some splinters or fragments of plastic in the wounds. 7. A dogs canine tooth is cone shaped and it will produce round or slightly oval holes depending how deep it penetrates; this is what we see in John’s sweatshirt, and it’s also what we see on his arm, small and large puncture wounds some distorted and some elongated due to the dog attack and John pulling away defending himself. 8. On his arm we see round puncture holes, and at least four of the bites we see parallel tear-drop shaped lacerations, caused by the two front canines pulling through the skin in the same direction. 9. When you compare the damage to the sweatshirt, to John's arm it proves that it was from canine teeth not shards of taillight. Small holes on the sweatshirt opposed to the long linear wounds on the arm. The reason that the damage to the sweatshirt does not match the amount of wounds on John’s arm, is because the dogs canines were already lodged in John’s loose sleeve as it tried to bite again and again.
10. If the wounds on John’s right arm were caused from broken taillight, then the sleeve of John’s sweatshirt would match perfectly with those wounds which they do not. You can’t fit a square peg into a round hole, everyone knows that.
You could have been holding a drinking glass at the time as well.... There was no dog dna.Your analysis is although deep highly incorrect and highly speculative
@@confused86996 The wounds were not swabbed for DNA, and the evidence chain of custody logs for John’s clothing was lost. Which means we have no idea what disgraced lead investigator Procter did or didn't do with the clothes.
THIS. Tge prosecution’s attorney is being so disrespectful to this doctor, who just did exactly what sge was asked, & he’s trying to change her testimony. unbelievable!!!!!!
Every citizen should be frightened. You are not allowed a fair trial in Norfolk county. They are putting on this spectacle and never charged Farwell for Sandra Birchmore murder. Disgusting.
No there is a specific standard an expert opinion must meet. It’s not whether SHE is qualified but rather whether the opinion meets the standards and test under Daubert. As a lawyer I don’t think it comes close to
The prosecution is doing a wonderful job of what he’s getting paid to do here and that’s by trying to come up with every reason possible to discredit her to testify but unfortunately her background speaks for itself. In my opinion this is a huge waste of time and honesty makes the prosecutor look like someone who would knock his own grandmother sitting in a wheelchair in front of a bus to save himself.
I’ve never witnessed such disrespect for fellow attorneys (Brennan- you KNOW how to pronounce Alessi’s name) and the accusatory tone towards Dr Russell- Bev is a total bent judge- needs to be investigated
yup! 🎯. At this point, it’s blatantly problematic! Karen could land in prison for doing nothing….& how is John’s brother & rest of family, not supporting Karen, theyre suing her in civil court. They’re hearing ALL this EVIDENCE, AND seeing it! I feel for Karen, she’s got ol lazer eyes okeefe burning a hole in her suit. Dude, you need some serious help.
The reason there's no one standard is because EVERY DOG BITE IS UNIQUE!! There is a combination of approaches and guidelines and standards provided by various organizations.. methods and guidelines of which can only provide a framework for identifying dog bites, as each case is unique. Therefore, experts use a combination of approaches to reach a conclusion.
He talks about the dog and checking the teeth but yet all we heard it was rehomed. I think that the prosecution is trying to dig holes and everything knowing that it was a dog I mean, I know scientist by any means but that totally looks like dog bites the death and everything and there’s so many things to this that doesn’t make sense, but that’s why the prosecution was working really hard on her cause they don’t want her there because they don’t want her saying the truth that there was dog bites not Damage from a vehicle
No DNA because they never tested his wounds. The clothing was In proctor’s car for weeks. There’s a process called chainnn by of custody. Those clothes could have been exposed to anything, or washed.
Hank was throwing out names of supposed expert’s to Dr. Russell. You don’t know Dr. Kinsey. The person he was referencing is not a doctor! Nor an expert on dog bites! This is a joke.
she is just unbelievable! Judge Canoni won’t even let tge attorneys argue an objection!!!! she thinks she knows everything. chards planted, DNA planted!!!!!! it’s so bad, she should recuse herself, what a sh*t show she’s turned this into, she is disrespectful to Karen ans her whole team, talks to them like children,”Im allowing it”, all nasty, like tge attorney questioned her, he did nothing, neither did Karen, deserve to be called out for reacting the same as we all did.
Brennan's statement about the puncture mark at the bottom of the abrasion, implies that "the point of entry" is the "puncture".. and that's why he is not dog bite expert 😮😂 The point of entry is not always the "puncture" mark. For example, If a dog bites with a glancing blow, the dog's teeth can slide along the skin, the point of entry might be a linear abrasion or laceration, without a puncture mark, or the dog can apply force and puncture the skin elsewhere along the abrasion, not necessarily at the beginning or the end.
look how John’s brother stares right through karen. I can’t believe how displaced their feelings are, i mean helen keller can see ehat happened to John, he wasn’t hit by a SUV.
@@Energymc2or maybe she’s sick of them glaring at her when she was only good to him and his family? Why act like you know the family dynamics? John O Keefe’s mom and the brother also sit at one end of the bench to the other and seems they don’t even have a good relationship so I think there was a lot more to them then what the public knows.
guess who else didn't go to the scene... Proctor despite being the lead on the case didn't go to the scene, none of the medical experts the cw called last trial went to the scene, you Hanky didnt go to the scene. I fail to see how that matters. There are no pictures or measurements from the scene of John O'keefe or anything to help anyone figure out measurements or how he was laying or what he looked like, what direction was his head, arms, hands, legs, feet? Thats right nobody has any proof of those things because nobody documented a dang thing at the crime scene. Furthermore, the lead investigator never got a search warrant to 34 Fairview, blood was collected in red solo cups and blown away by a leaf blower when the defense attorney asked about the dog the CW said the was rehoused and they couldn’t get any information on Chloe. What a shame they are putting this women through
She seems so bias….i am not sure what her deal is but i think this trial is going to be awful. She is going to work hard for the prosecution and not be fair
She won’t even let them argue an objection, because SHE gets do decide what they think, or want to convey, to the court. Unbelievable. Judge Canoni needs recused, and if she’s friends with the prosecutor & in the DA’s pocket, she should sit in judgement of no one. She doesn’t have to sit in proson for the rest of her life, for a crime she didn’t commit!
Bev doesn’t even allow the attorneys to argue their objections! It’s just OBJECTION, & she decides wgat the argument is!!! What kind of HERE YE, HERE YE COURT IS THIS? STAY HUMBLE, Judge Canoni. she also called karen read out for simply disagreeing & shaking her head! She needs to go, no option for not guilty, mistrial, when it wasn’t necessary..
Brennan made some good points today and he’s starting to show his teeth so to speak. I think he did a lot of over talking and made personal statements during his questioning that the judge allowed and some of the questioning wasn’t even relevant. He also interrupted Dr. Russell and didn’t allow her to finish her response. I think the judge has already ruled that she was an expert in the first trial and to disqualify her now would crazy. But you never know
I agree. He was so ignorant to a woman who has by far better qualifications than himself. Aunty Bev cannot say no to her testifying at the up & coming trial. She found in the first trial that she was qualified , so cannot say for this next trial that the isn't
@@SusanRidyard Don't you understand? This is all theater and he has to do what he's doing to disprove the insanity of the most ridiculous defense of all time
It’s all theater? wtf does that mean? I was under the impression that it was about justice for Officer John O Keefe. Were you one of the people giggling and pointing at the camera? You people are sick.
Wait. I thought Alessi was supposed to be this hotshot whipsmart lawyer? Did anyone else see that? I couldn’t believe the weakness of his argument. But then he’s stuck trying to defend Marie Russell 😬😬😬
Why the state so worried about this doctor she's the expert obviously they trying to pick and choose whenever they want how ever they want ....let justice be ....if it's real justice Karen is free .. this is a dog wound / bite .. Therefore the Alberts are the ones whom should be looked at should of been years ago
Love the way she is ignoring him ... why should she even pay ANY attention??? She made up her mind years ago, and unfortunately for Karen, she is the authority in this case. Disgraceful and downright scary.
Please, we need at least 5 professional qualified experts who take this case for once and for all! And this way, make sure if Karen' guiltily facts of that night come out to light!
Great recross from the defense. The prosecutor was ridiculous. I am not a fan of KR, but she deserves a fair trial which I do not think she is getting.
I have replied to all the questions that people asked, but I noticed that you only post what suits your narrative, which is disingenuous to your followers.
Oh but Mr Alessi, DeMunich & Pollack are not your Experts are they? So that’s not the “end of the inquiry”. You’ve got Marie Russell. And there’s no reason this court should believe DeMunich & Pollack would agree with YOUR Expert. 😏
Please we need at least 5 profesionals qualified expertsb that take this case for once and for all! And this way, make sure if Karen' guiltily facts of that night come out to light!
lol. Alessi brings up “dog bite cases” legal cases to argue why Russell should be allowed. But the Karen Read Case is NOT a “dog bite” case. That’s a DEFENSE THEORY
Alessi is absolutely sounding like a nut. Making the claim that Russell’s sight ONLY identification of the injuries on John’s Arm, can only be (or ARE) “dog bites”, to the exclusion of all of the gazillion possibilities they could be when only using her eyesight and experience, and CLAIMING that is a perfect example of a Pathognomonic Finding is as insane as Russell sounds. There’s only 2 options here. Either this Defense & this expert have all agreed to do all it takes, even lie to the Court (imo) in order to confuse the next jury, or they’re all lunatics that really believe the snake oil they’re drinking & don’t care how stupid they sound. Wow 😮
John was Beat to Death at 34 Fairview & that friggin dog attacked him. That fact that everyone involved in this Case is so willing to cover-up what the they all did The FEDS are coming for you all
Pretty sure judge is going to allow Russell to testify as she needs to give defense wide latitude That said I wholly agree w Brennan about the lack of science here, that Russell can just say whatever she wants and there’s no methodology to compare it to.
DOG BITE OR TAILLIGHT?
1. The Commonwealth’s theory is that John’s arm was hit by Karen’s polycarbonate plastic taillight at 24 mph causing it to virtually explode resulting in the cuts to Johns right arm, also spreading across the Alberts lawn leaving a wide debris field of more than 47 pieces and shards of many shapes and sizes.
2. There are nine holes on the right arm of John’s sweatshirt, but there are 20 plus wounds on Johns right arm more than twice the number of wounds compared to the holes in the sweatshirt, that doesn’t happen with shards of exploding glass or plastic, you get one hole, one wound, matching like a bullet hole.
3. The nine holes on the right arm of John’s sweatshirt are all round/ oval, and about the thickness of a pencil 6 to 8mm in diameter. What are the chances that all these pieces of taillight of various shapes and sizes made these 9 almost identical size holes in the right sleeve of Johns sweatshirt?
4. If the wounds were from a broken taillight shard, there would be a square/rectangular hole in the sweatshirt and a square/rectangular wound on John’s arm matching the hole in the sweatshirt and the shard would most likely be still lodged in his arm just like any sharp projectile hitting your body, say shattering glass or a bullet.
5. The polycarbonate plastic in this case is about one eight of an inch in thickness about 3mm, shards from this taillight will not produce round holes, no matter if they are large or small, they will always produce rectangular shaped holes. Judging by the scale next to the largest hole in the sleeve of the sweatshirt it is no more than 10 mm in diameter. Logic will tell you that a shard no bigger than 10mm x 3mm would have passed through the sweatshirt. Most all the wounds are substantially larger than the holes in the sweatshirt.
6. All the holes show pulled fibres around the edges which tells us whatever made the holes was also removed from the holes, like a stab wound, or a dog bite. If Johns wounds had been caused by shards of taillight, we would expect to find at least some splinters or fragments of plastic in the wounds.
7. A dogs canine tooth is cone shaped and it will produce round or slightly oval holes depending how deep it penetrates; this is what we see in John’s sweatshirt, and it’s also what we see on his arm, small and large puncture wounds some distorted and some elongated due to the dog attack and John pulling away defending himself.
8. On his arm we see round puncture holes, and at least four of the bites we see parallel tear-drop shaped lacerations, caused by the two front canines pulling through the skin in the same direction.
9. When you compare the damage to the sweatshirt, to John's arm it proves that it was from canine teeth not shards of taillight. Small holes on the sweatshirt opposed to the long linear wounds on the arm. The reason that the damage to the sweatshirt does not match the amount of wounds on John’s arm, is because the dogs canines were already lodged in John’s loose sleeve as it tried to bite again and again.
10. If the wounds on John’s right arm were caused from broken taillight, then the sleeve of John’s sweatshirt would match perfectly with those wounds which they do not. You can’t fit a square peg into a round hole, everyone knows that.
You could have been holding a drinking glass at the time as well....
There was no dog dna.Your analysis is although deep highly incorrect and highly speculative
It’s common for DNA to not be present when an article of clothing has been wet.
@@momsaccount3474 It was most likely washed a few times who knows?
@@confused86996 The wounds were not swabbed for DNA, and the evidence chain of custody logs for John’s clothing was lost. Which means we have no idea what disgraced lead investigator Procter did or didn't do with the clothes.
THIS. Tge prosecution’s attorney is being so disrespectful to this doctor, who just did exactly what sge was asked, & he’s trying to change her testimony. unbelievable!!!!!!
This Woman is obviously qualified. This is Public Display of Age Dicrimination.
Every citizen should be frightened.
You are not allowed a fair trial in Norfolk county. They are putting on this spectacle and never charged Farwell for Sandra Birchmore murder. Disgusting.
No there is a specific standard an expert opinion must meet. It’s not whether SHE is qualified but rather whether the opinion meets the standards and test under Daubert. As a lawyer I don’t think it comes close to
You didn’t finish a sentence. I highly doubt your a lawyer.
Trooper Paul was the Commonwealth’s highly qualified crash reconstruction expert.
Right. Let's not forget that!!! Laughable! Yet CW has an issue with Dr. Russell. The irony.
The prosecution is doing a wonderful job of what he’s getting paid to do here and that’s by trying to come up with every reason possible to discredit her to testify but unfortunately her background speaks for itself. In my opinion this is a huge waste of time and honesty makes the prosecutor look like someone who would knock his own grandmother sitting in a wheelchair in front of a bus to save himself.
This judge is the absolutely worst. She acts like a petulant child.
What timestamp does she act like a child? I must’ve missed it.
No timestamp needed. It’s pretty much the entire time.
I’ve never witnessed such disrespect for fellow attorneys (Brennan- you KNOW how to pronounce Alessi’s name) and the accusatory tone towards Dr Russell- Bev is a total bent judge- needs to be investigated
How much are you being paid?
yup! 🎯. At this point, it’s blatantly problematic! Karen could land in prison for doing nothing….& how is John’s brother & rest of family, not supporting Karen, theyre suing her in civil court. They’re hearing ALL this EVIDENCE, AND seeing it! I feel for Karen, she’s got ol lazer eyes okeefe burning a hole in her suit. Dude, you need some serious help.
The reason there's no one standard is because EVERY DOG BITE IS UNIQUE!!
There is a combination of approaches and guidelines and standards provided by various organizations..
methods and guidelines of which can only provide a framework for identifying dog bites, as each case is unique. Therefore, experts use a combination of approaches to reach a conclusion.
It would be.
So but there is no dna therefore no animal
He talks about the dog and checking the teeth but yet all we heard it was rehomed. I think that the prosecution is trying to dig holes and everything knowing that it was a dog I mean, I know scientist by any means but that totally looks like dog bites the death and everything and there’s so many things to this that doesn’t make sense, but that’s why the prosecution was working really hard on her cause they don’t want her there because they don’t want her saying the truth that there was dog bites not Damage from a vehicle
It doesn’t seem that complicated… yet that attorney tried to concoct & impeach, a MEDICAL EXPERT!!!!! Come ON, Judge!
No DNA because they never tested his wounds. The clothing was In proctor’s car for weeks. There’s a process called chainnn by of custody. Those clothes could have been exposed to anything, or washed.
Hank was throwing out names of supposed expert’s to Dr. Russell. You don’t know Dr. Kinsey. The person he was referencing is not a doctor! Nor an expert on dog bites!
This is a joke.
How can the prosecutor emphatically state that Dr. Russell isn’t an expert on diagnosing a dog bite. Is he?
This judge is so disgusting! They need to investigate her
The judge is great
she is just unbelievable! Judge Canoni won’t even let tge attorneys argue an objection!!!! she thinks she knows everything. chards planted, DNA planted!!!!!! it’s so bad, she should recuse herself, what a sh*t show she’s turned this into, she is disrespectful to Karen ans her whole team, talks to them like children,”Im allowing it”, all nasty, like tge attorney questioned her, he did nothing, neither did Karen, deserve to be called out for reacting the same as we all did.
@@confused86996 Yes. No wonder you are confused.
@@confused86996
You definitely confused yes
Brennan's statement about the puncture mark at the bottom of the abrasion, implies that "the point of entry" is the "puncture".. and that's why he is not dog bite expert 😮😂
The point of entry is not always the "puncture" mark.
For example,
If a dog bites with a glancing blow, the dog's teeth can slide along the skin, the point of entry might be a linear abrasion or laceration, without a puncture mark, or the dog can apply force and puncture the skin elsewhere along the abrasion, not necessarily at the beginning or the end.
Exactly. There are so many ways to show and prove this. If the almighty Bev would allow.
He is now saying that medicine is a soft science like handwriting analysis?
look how John’s brother stares right through karen. I can’t believe how displaced their feelings are, i mean helen keller can see ehat happened to John, he wasn’t hit by a SUV.
EXACTLY! SMH
Regardless the seating should be changed. It’s not the fng Salem witch trials where the accusers can stare her down, laugh and mock her. Sick.
KR turns and smirks at him time to time. She never looked at Paul's wife until the last day of trial and she smirked at Erin. She's evil.
@@Energymc2or maybe she’s sick of them glaring at her when she was only good to him and his family? Why act like you know the family dynamics? John O Keefe’s mom and the brother also sit at one end of the bench to the other and seems they don’t even have a good relationship so I think there was a lot more to them then what the public knows.
@@Energymc2 I agree with you Erin is evil.
How many times is Brennan going to “Fiddle” his papers 🤔 Weird
guess who else didn't go to the scene...
Proctor despite being the lead on the case didn't go to the scene, none of the medical experts the cw called last trial went to the scene, you Hanky didnt go to the scene. I fail to see how that matters. There are no pictures or measurements from the scene of John O'keefe or anything to help anyone figure out measurements or how he was laying or what he looked like, what direction was his head, arms, hands, legs, feet? Thats right nobody has any proof of those things because nobody documented a dang thing at the crime scene. Furthermore, the lead investigator never got a search warrant to 34 Fairview, blood was collected in red solo cups and blown away by a leaf blower when the defense attorney asked about the dog the CW said the was rehoused and they couldn’t get any information on Chloe. What a shame they are putting this women through
is it possible that Brennan is worse than Lallypop
Yes
Oh BIG TIME !
Auntie Bev ‘I’m going to allow that question.’
She seems so bias….i am not sure what her deal is but i think this trial is going to be awful. She is going to work hard for the prosecution and not be fair
She allows all questions for prosecutors. She is friends of one of them! Favoritism and bad judge!
She won’t even let them argue an objection, because SHE gets do decide what they think, or want to convey, to the court. Unbelievable. Judge Canoni needs recused, and if she’s friends with the prosecutor & in the DA’s pocket, she should sit in judgement of no one. She doesn’t have to sit in proson for the rest of her life, for a crime she didn’t commit!
Bev doesn’t even allow the attorneys to argue their objections! It’s just OBJECTION, & she decides wgat the argument is!!! What kind of HERE YE, HERE YE COURT IS THIS? STAY HUMBLE, Judge Canoni. she also called karen read out for simply disagreeing & shaking her head! She needs to go, no option for not guilty, mistrial, when it wasn’t necessary..
Same thoughts! Objecting without giving the opportunity to add to the record! Scary!!!
This young over paid lawyer, wanna be prosecutor sounds just like the original lalle!, He sounds just like him ! Maybe a Nephew!🥴😳🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
Brennan made some good points today and he’s starting to show his teeth so to speak. I think he did a lot of over talking and made personal statements during his questioning that the judge allowed and some of the questioning wasn’t even relevant. He also interrupted Dr. Russell and didn’t allow her to finish her response. I think the judge has already ruled that she was an expert in the first trial and to disqualify her now would crazy. But you never know
OMG can't watch this!
She is far from an expert
@@confused86996so who would you say is an expert ?
Without commentary to the defence but we listened to it nonstop for hours from the prosecution
The prosecution is doing a good job of challenging the dog bite expert. The lack of dog DNA is a problem.
The commonwealth needs to investigated by the Federal Government they would all be replaced.
He got nerve picking her apart when he got no problem w the police work that the citizens rely on
every single human feels the same”God, I miss you” pain she feels, because we have lost someone too. not one dry eye here. Brutal 💔💔💔
Omg, Hank is such a liar!!
Oh my god hank is actually a great attorney
I agree. He was so ignorant to a woman who has by far better qualifications than himself. Aunty Bev cannot say no to her testifying at the up & coming trial. She found in the first trial that she was qualified
, so cannot say for this next trial that the isn't
@@SusanRidyard Don't you understand?
This is all theater and he has to do what he's doing to disprove the insanity of the most ridiculous defense of all time
It’s all theater? wtf does that mean?
I was under the impression that it was about justice for Officer John O Keefe.
Were you one of the people giggling and pointing at the camera?
You people are sick.
@@confused86996 wow I see your name everywhere… Who are you related to, auntie Bev?
So why is Mass Gov questioning an expert witness that has been approved as an expert? Cats chasing a tail…
Why don't you bring the dog to testify and give you it's DNA!
Wait.
I thought Alessi was supposed to be this hotshot whipsmart lawyer?
Did anyone else see that?
I couldn’t believe the weakness of his argument.
But then he’s stuck trying to defend Marie Russell 😬😬😬
Why the state so worried about this doctor she's the expert obviously they trying to pick and choose whenever they want how ever they want ....let justice be ....if it's real justice Karen is free .. this is a dog wound / bite ..
Therefore the Alberts are the ones whom should be looked at should of been years ago
This prosecutor is a jerk. If I was a juror I would be against his presentation. The doctor is doing a great job. Prosecutor. Not so much.
Love the way she is ignoring him ... why should she even pay ANY attention??? She made up her mind years ago, and unfortunately for Karen, she is the authority in this case. Disgraceful and downright scary.
Then they can’t say it wasn’t a dog bite
Ugh the small awkward courtroom
Please, we need at least 5 professional qualified experts who take this case for once and for all! And this way, make sure if Karen' guiltily facts of that night come out to light!
Great recross from the defense. The prosecutor was ridiculous. I am not a fan of KR, but she deserves a fair trial which I do not think she is getting.
Is lalli still being paid for sitting in this courtroom after he was replaced by that other disrespectful so called lawyer? And who’s paying
If it was from the taillight, it wouldn't be all down his arm, it would just be in one spot! Those are from an animal, period!
I have replied to all the questions that people asked, but I noticed that you only post what suits your narrative, which is disingenuous to your followers.
Oh Bev rushing it along again
Nap time
6:40:36 she’s NOT LISTENING 🤢🤮
She was playing solitaire on her phone.
She never does. She didn't in the first trial hasn't today and won't in 3 weeks time
What’s in the “water bottle “?
Oh but Mr Alessi, DeMunich & Pollack are not your Experts are they?
So that’s not the “end of the inquiry”.
You’ve got Marie Russell. And there’s no reason this court should believe DeMunich & Pollack would agree with YOUR Expert. 😏
I predict this testimony will be excluded. Fails to meet daubert.
Please we need at least 5 profesionals qualified expertsb that take this case for once and for all! And this way, make sure if Karen' guiltily facts of that night come out to light!
There was no dog bite fact! Confirmed by experts!
It is 100 percent a dog bite.
Of there is an expert stating other wise he will be on the stand.
I been biten by dogs before badly i see dog bites just like the ones i got ...
🤓☝️You didn't know whether Mr. okeef was levitating when he was hit. Did you, Dr Russell?
lol. Alessi brings up “dog bite cases” legal cases to argue why Russell should be allowed.
But the Karen Read Case is NOT a “dog bite” case. That’s a DEFENSE THEORY
Bev is a dirty judge in my opinion. Her bias is so blatant. Shocking.
Alessi is absolutely sounding like a nut. Making the claim that Russell’s sight ONLY identification of the injuries on John’s Arm, can only be (or ARE) “dog bites”, to the exclusion of all of the gazillion possibilities they could be when only using her eyesight and experience, and CLAIMING that is a perfect example of a Pathognomonic Finding is as insane as Russell sounds.
There’s only 2 options here.
Either this Defense & this expert have all agreed to do all it takes, even lie to the Court (imo) in order to confuse the next jury, or they’re all lunatics that really believe the snake oil they’re drinking & don’t care how stupid they sound.
Wow 😮
She should be taken to Fairview and then maybe she can qualify. What kind of BS is that when the lead investigator never even went to Fairview!!
John was Beat to Death at 34 Fairview & that friggin dog attacked him.
That fact that everyone involved in this Case is so willing to cover-up what the they all did
The FEDS are coming for you all
Pretty sure judge is going to allow Russell to testify as she needs to give defense wide latitude
That said I wholly agree w Brennan about the lack of science here, that Russell can just say whatever she wants and there’s no methodology to compare it to.