I think the Honda looks nicer but the Husky looks cooler, the Honda is faster by over 10mph and a few hundred cheaper.......... unfortunately the Honda is a fair bit smaller......... decisions decisions.
Im my opinion the Honda is 10 times better. The engine is brandnew and not 10 years old like the Husqvarna (KTM engine), it's about 25kg lighter which is very inportant in this low cc-class and i think that it looks better but that's very objective
10 times, netter? Both bikes looking great. Both motors are equally the same. Your opinion is not objective ... its subjective :-) The only downgrade i can see here, is the price. Imo to pay over 5k for a 125cc bike is too much. But this is subjective too.
Heavier bikes are more stable. Husqvarna's tall seat height and center of gravity compensate for the weight. I ride a Husqvarna 250 cc and it has never given me any trouble, its engine is butter, I don't feel the weight even during cornering and twisties. I have test driven a Honda cb300. It is an excellent bike in terms of throttling and gear shift, but difficult to maneuver around corners and lane splitting. You can feel its weight despite it being lighter. Not mention Husqvarna uses a trellis frame, which is extremely tough compared to Honda's unibody frame. I don't think Honda is 10 times better, because that's an arbitrary number. They are almost the same but feel different.
In my opinion the Husqvarna look much better and cooler !!
I think the Honda looks nicer but the Husky looks cooler, the Honda is faster by over 10mph and a few hundred cheaper.......... unfortunately the Honda is a fair bit smaller......... decisions decisions.
Im my opinion the Honda is 10 times better. The engine is brandnew and not 10 years old like the Husqvarna (KTM engine), it's about 25kg lighter which is very inportant in this low cc-class and i think that it looks better but that's very objective
10 times, netter?
Both bikes looking great.
Both motors are equally the same.
Your opinion is not objective ... its subjective :-)
The only downgrade i can see here, is the price. Imo to pay over 5k for a 125cc bike is too much. But this is subjective too.
@@rubberfooty yeah i meant subjective
For me, the Honda, I believe there engines are the most reliable.
Heavier bikes are more stable. Husqvarna's tall seat height and center of gravity compensate for the weight. I ride a Husqvarna 250 cc and it has never given me any trouble, its engine is butter, I don't feel the weight even during cornering and twisties. I have test driven a Honda cb300. It is an excellent bike in terms of throttling and gear shift, but difficult to maneuver around corners and lane splitting. You can feel its weight despite it being lighter. Not mention Husqvarna uses a trellis frame, which is extremely tough compared to Honda's unibody frame.
I don't think Honda is 10 times better, because that's an arbitrary number. They are almost the same but feel different.
@@AjayKumar-hh6hx I was thinking its about 132% better
There is no vs or competition, CB125R is far superior