Are Mongols Different From The Turkic Peoples? |
Вставка
- Опубліковано 19 чер 2021
- How Different Are The Mongols From The Turkic Peoples?
Watch Full Episode: • #AskAbhijit 3: Genghis...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUPPORT THE CHANNEL
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
►UPI (G-Pay/PhonePe/Paytm): abhijitchavda@icici
►PayPal: paypal.me/AbhijitChavda
►Become A Member on UA-cam: / @abhijitchavda
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
JOIN #AbhijitChavda
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
★Twitter: / abhijitchavda
★Instagram: / theabhijitchavda
★Facebook: / theabhijitchavda
★Website:
★Email Inquiries: inquiries.chavda@gmail.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
#AbhijitChavdaPodcast
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
★Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/1WmKYRI...
★Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
★Google Podcasts: podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0...
★Stitcher: www.stitcher.com/show/the-abh...
★Amazon Music: music.amazon.in/podcasts/c879...
★Soundcloud: / abhijitchavda
★Audible: www.audible.com/pd/item_name-...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
#AskAbhijitChavda #Abhijit #Chavda #AskAbhijitShow
Thank you for watching!
Please share the video and spread the message. 🙏
When you speak about the "European" Turks which are the modern day Azerbaijanis, Turkmens and Anatolian Turkish Turks you are referring to the Oghuz branch of Turks. You missed the opportunity to speak about the Central Asian Turks such as the Kyrgyz and the Kazakhs of the Kipchak branch of Turks who more closely resemble modern day Mongols.
yes he missed confused turkic with only Turkish people , all turkic people aren't turkish, like for example the yakutsk people of sakha republic or some people who speak some turkic languages in modern Mongolia , they nigh look very similar to modern day mongols.
Oghuz Turks are also depicted as asian looking with slanted eyes. Most anatolian Turkish and Azerbaijan population are not Turkic at all.
@@troigcyusaDon't lie.Both of them are Turkic but they heavily mixed with other peoples
@@turkoguzlu8578So much mixed that they’re not Turkic anymore.
@@troigcyusa Today english are mix of brits kelts saxons vikings all but not english many nation mixed between true centuries same Turks
Marriage by bride abduction naybe one aspect of cultural transformation. The greater impact had the gradual ismalization of the Armenian, Greek and other ethnicities. Whoever became a Muslim, also with the time became a Turk, because marriages with non-muslims were less possible.
we are very thankful to you for sharing your tremendous knowledge
Very well explained . Thank you for sharing.
We Huns made many many tribes and nations. Abhijit Chavda your channel is most excellent Thank you for mention my ancestors.
huna people kis country se aaye the
chauhan are also huns?
@@gauravpandey4940 I think hungrey
@@gauravpandey4940. Central Asia which includes Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Uzbekistan Turkmenistan Tajikistan and uighur province of China
@@lll2282 no different people
That's it.
And you can also see that the present Turkic peoples in Central Asia- except those in Anatolia- do look like the other east asian ethnic groups.
So it's obvious that they both relate.
Are arabs and turkish mote closely connected with europe
You are Pride of india sir....hats off
can you please provide us with some references or books we can review it, to prove the point to some of my friends.?
My one of my best friend is Alevilik-Turkish... this video is perfectly made for him... thank you
Yes Turks and Mongolians have same ancestors but Turks migrated towards Europe and Middle East and during the Ottoman Empire they mixed up with many other nations along the way.😊
Sir nice information 🥰
Thanks Sir
#Askabhijit sir I wanted to know that why there is no influence of indian architecture outside India (Europe)? Unlikely to the influence of roman and islamic architecture even in our own country and many parts of world?
lmao Learn the history of Europe
@@ChandranPrema123 share a link here
Come to indonesia.. we still have temple from hindu and budhist architecture
Cuz Indian architecture mainly in temples . Outside India is non hindu and not interesting in hindu architecture.
India's influence can be seen throught South East Asia. Islam has wipped out all native cultures west to India. So how will we find India's influence.
Same with Christanity. It destroys native culture and replaces it with Christian practices
Turks started migrating west during the iron age and mixed with those earlier Indo-European steppe nomads. Many non-Asian looking peoples blended into the Turkish society. They already had a fair share of Indo-European DNA in their pool during the migration into Anatolia. There is a recent genetic study made on Seljuks sultans and apparently they also had Indo-European looks 1000 years ago.
In the beginning of their history and possibly up to 2000 years ago it is quite possible they were much closer ethnically. They were closer culturally. Much has changed and they may not be so similar today.
Mongols are the real Hun descendant👍🏼 Even the word Hun has meaning “Human” in Mongolian and Hunnud/Hunnu means people.
The earliest reference to the Mongols classifies them as a Tang dynasty tribe of Shiwei during the eighth century. It was only after the fall of the Liao dynasty in 1125 that they became an important tribe on the Central Asian steppe, but tribal wars weakened their power over the ensuing century. During the thirteenth century, the term Mongol was used to refer to the Mongolic and Turkic tribes who fell under the control of Genghis Khan. The Mongols are primarily a shamanist society; their central deity is the sky god Tenger.
What is the meaning of the word "Turk" in Mongolian language? Oppressor? Bandit? Ruler? Warlord?
@@alienozdamar Why you asking me this?
Hun is turkic loan word in mongol lanaguge.it's not original mongolic word.
Biggest foreign element in mongol langauge are the Turkic loanwords.
Тиим!!! Тиим!!!
on 2:20 u stated that modern Turks are descendent of Armenians and Greeks. I disagree. They have admixtures of Arabs, Persians and Balkan peoples'. The Ottoman rulers provided free education for children of Balkan origins. Many grew up to become influential figures throughout the Ottoman period.
Aka Albanian and Bosniak
He didnt say decendants but mix of greek armenian and Turkic migrants. And whatever is around that region that time.
He said about majority
Ottomans provided education to their colonized subjects, to be brainwashed into serving the empire of their masters
greek dna is arround or less than %5 in turkey if you check genmap of europe from google how it means turks are mix greeks ? @@gravewalker34
I am from Turkiye and I love Pakistan and Indian people a lot. You are unique, beautiful, hardworking, smart people. Bless you all❤
It sounds logical
Some Turks look white for the same reason that some Arabs do. There were a lot of female sex slaves traded over there. In Eastern Europe, we fought with them non-stop because they used to kidnap women and children, especially those of Slavic and Greek blood. In many paintings from a few centuries back, the Turks still had slanted eyes. The Russians, Greeks, Serbians, Hungarians, and Poles defeated them after centuries of invasions.
True.
greeks are not white, they are literal mediterraneans. Euroasians are white generally. check the turkic folks that live under russian control. they are blonde with slanted eyes. whiteness came to anatolia from east, not west. just like slavs being eastern.
İyi salliyorsun böylece Türklere olan düşmanlık egonu bu hiç bir dayanağı olmayan fikirlerle tatmin ediyorsun biz Türklerin çekik gözlü sarı saçlı mavi gözlü olanlarida var bunlara Kıpçak ve Tatar denir🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿❤️❤️❤️❤️🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷
Turks look like europeans because they are mixed with greeks
Not only with greeks but also with slavic people.
epicantic fold, men
Huns or Turks is the same people in Chinese ancient literature. Both Mongols and Manchurians (Both roled China including last Chinese emperor) are the decendents of Huns and speak Turkic style language. Both Korean and Japanese are the cousins of Turkic language, which are very different in grammar from Mandarin Chinese, though their writing are heavily influenced by Chinese.
Lol that is not completely true... If you love in turkey you will see a lot of people with mongloid features too. And the thing is that the mongols had turkey long time back... By now it is diluted and mixed over the years with European features... So Turkish people are one of the most beautiful mix with a lil bit of everything.
Essentially, they are mix of greeks, anatolians and armenian converts. Real turks were in minority.
@@denvergamingzone9766 bro talking like he is genetic analyser. do you have any idea about anatolian people's blood?
@@denvergamingzone9766 Nah not even close. Seljuks were not Mongols. And that's who they are.
Target: Turkish(Bolu)(NorthWest)
Distance: 1.2608% / 0.01260777
49.8 Turkmen_Uzbekistan
26.0 Greek_Cappadocia
12.6 Turkey_WestByzantine
10.4 Ukraine_ Medieval. SG
1.0 Levant_Sidon_1800BC
0.2 Armenian_Ararat
Target: Turkish(Muğla)(SouthWest)
Distance: 1.5199% / 0.01519901
59.6 Turkmen_Uzbekistan
35.0 Turkey_WestByzantine
5.2 Ukraine_ Medieval. SG
0.2 Greek_Cappadocia
@@oinotropwick1144 yes I have but i am not ignorant like over nationalist turks🤡
@@denvergamingzone9766 i am not proud or ashamed of my race. im just telling the facts. ignorance is thinking that a nomadic culture can surpass the established cultures.
their ancestors were partially central asian.
at first this didn't make sense to me until i did some reading and i gained coherence and now it all makes sense on how turks look rather european than their likes from uyghur, kazakhstan, mongolia and siberians and so on
Turks don’t look European but Anatolid Turanid you boxhead😂
Some argue if Turks were originally Eastern Eurasians Or Western Eurasians before they started mixing with one another be it willing, kinda, or by near force yeah.
Proto Turks could started out as anthropologically neither. But they were underpinned by a mongolic like phenotypical appear because of being in similar environment(and geographical location) as far easterners
about 20 percent of turkey actualy has arab descendance and i found this out just recently, some of us look syrian, iraqi, and we see the kurds in turkiye as arabs too.. arab migration did happen id say during the empire times.
Can you do topic of hazara people of Afghanistan
We are mixed mongols and chinese peoples but we are turks
I'm a barlas mongol whose ancestors mixed with some turkic tribes and then our ancestors came to India at the time of babur with him and now are settled in jammu and kashmir part of India. But if u look at kazaks they have same facial features like original turks. I also don't look like ancient mongols Or turks
Nice i want to know more about your turkic history
@@durjay21 yeh sure
Do u know once aryans also came from somewhere in modern Turkmenistan
@@durjay21 yes because before Turks came to turkmenistan, uzbekistan and other central Asian countries aryan were there and then turks and mongols came from Mongolian steppe and occupied those countries. Originally turks and mongols are same but they split from each other thousand of years ago and went to different places especially turks because they did not stay in their homeland and went to eastern Europe and central Asia while most the mongols stayed at their homeland. If u wanna speak in hindi Or urdu i can speak because I live in jammu and Kashmir. My ancestors came from central Asia but I'm born here and speak hindi Or urdu whatever u want to speak
I m from kolkata west bengal i know hindi
Today in Afghanistan hazara people also they live in queta Pakistan hazara town they also our cousins but they speak little persian word but originally pure turko Mongol people like us we also turko mongol
This is why the practice still in the Caucasus and it's people are actually Turks. That makes sense
I thought Mongolian was a mix
Nahh Turks was mix
List of central Asian mixing In India :
1) Parthavas [Now Hindu]
2) Shakas [ Now Hindu]
3) gujjars [ majority Hindu & sikh and some momins]
4) Kushanas [Hindus and Buddhists]
5) Huns [ Hindus ]
6) Turks [ formerly Hindu shahi dynasty later became momins ]
If you know more add in the list 👇🏻👇🏻
Turks are mixture of greeks and Armenians.
Gujjars are descendants of Kushans
@Rosé hahaha funny
Ghaznavid
Ghorid,
Mamluk state of delhi,
Baburids (Mughal)
They all Turks
@@MrSoothsayer turks doesn’t mean only the people of Turkey...only turkish turk looks European, but central asian turks like- Kazakh,Kyrgyz,uzbek,uyghur,turkmen,uzbek they have asian facial feature
🤣
Stop mixing Mongolian with Turk because they once shared the same thing.. Mongolian is Mongolian!!
You’re missing the point, they are discussing how Turks are different from Mongols.
🔥🌨🌈
So Turks are not turk any more for the hot mix
1-Turkic and Mongolic peoples aren’t ethnically or linguistically related to each other :) They are only culturally similar also some Turks got Mongolized and some Mongols got Turkified
2-Average Turk has 35% Medieval Turkic DNA which is more than Indic DNA of Indians and Bengalis
3-By this logic Northern Indians are not Indic peoples because they don’t look Indic
"Turkic and Mongolic peoples aren’t ethnically or linguistically related to each other :)" 🤣
Turkic and mongolic people are by both ethnically and linguistically related to each other. I’m central asian uzbek turk. It’s possible to distinguish mongoloid races by their look. Central asians and mongols look like very similar. Especially nomadic turks of Central Asia.
Dude during the time of huns turks and mongols were same and modern turkey was Greece , the Turks later on started invasions/campaigns . They started to mix with the caucasians in the Modern turkey region and the new turks had european features . Due to the conversion to Islam many turkic practices were lost but are still practiced by some which are very much similar to mongols .
@@shlokjha5753 nice joke
Are you a Pakistani bot? What is exactly Indian look? The one stereotyped by White people? Get out of colonial slave mentality
Not different both they were from Altaic mountain.😊😊
Brother turkey is a country with different ethnic groups i did a dna test my heritage and i was 72% west asian and from turkey kayseri and i tap on it it says turks in turkey te rest 17.4 south italian greec and 7.6 arab 1.3 inuit 0.9 native american
myheritage is unreliable, actually, most dna tests are but gedmatch is more accurate than myheritage
There were so many turkic tribes not everybody looked same.
Jai Hind. The Turks had ruled over Indians for millinium but we Hindus are not Turkified due to our resilient culture.
Not Turks, Afghans, Turks kept getting crushed by Afghans and Sassanids, Mughal empire was Mongolian in origins not Turks, don’t believe the lies of these Turks.
They were from the Mangang(Mang) clan of Meitei who worship Teng Pan Ma-Pu.Even the European also originate from us; Lai and Tin went to the west...Even todays Meitei words has many similarities with English words for example: sorry= Soiray/Soi, meeting=mee-teen,I=I/Ei, Hen=Yen,Full=full,found=Fang,Loud= Lao,Line=Lei-ee,wood=woo, call=Kou,Serious=Sire,Fly=Pai, Pile=Pei/Pie,Local=Lai-kol/Leikai(Residence of the Lais), King=Ning thou (Mind warrior), Sound=Khond, Pond=E-kond, Torrent=Turen, Tailor=Tai/Taipa/Tailo...etc At present there are 150 Meitei words similar with english words.Mainland Indian surname like Chauhan is a Meitei word which means(eldest son)Chau=Big; Han=elder; In ancient times elder son was also called Arihan/Ari Ahan.
Bro i am surprised to find my meitei people in comment manipur ima na yaidare
Huns, turks, mongolians, korean, japanic, american Indians, alaskan, yakuts, siberian etc. came from ancient Altaic branch (b.c 20.000-a.d 1.000) . in modern days, still many words definitions, religion terms bi-directionally are same or similar meaning. languages, cultures, definitions very similar.
Japanic people are more isolated culture at japan island for long time.
Modern Turkish and Azerbaijani people are mixed too much in geography after the migrations from central asia between b.c 20.000 - a.d 1000 with other culutur such as European, persian, slavic, arabs etc.
I have japan, Azerbaijani, Xinjiang (uyghur), finnish, mongolian, uzbek friends. We have a lot of similarities in daylife and its very impressive for me.
The most bizarre things are for example japans between modern turkish cultures. They call Blue color as Kok as in japan word. We call kok(gok) as sky, sky is blue and old turkish color name is kok. Used still in uyghur as kok. 'Tengri' is the shaman god word in old turkish and modern turks uses 'tanrı' comes from kok-tengri( god is sky or god from sky) and still in day life, turks uses tanri like 'god' instead of allah('arabic defination') and central asians are still use tengri while in Islam.
Also we have mantı as food. japans has same food. Japans eat meals without table (not in modern life but still it's a culture and exist. Same as in turkey still and its not bizzare if someone invite you to land-based table without chair. Japan Language if its written in latin i definitely understand an idea about which word is object/subject/verbals/time so bizarre eventhough i dont know the meaning of words. But past tense or he she/gender etc...
Also at american indians are uses hundered words are same as in turkish like animals/numbers/colors etc...
So bizzare. That is the reason ethnically modern turks DNA's mixed in last 1k reason of long time period ottoman empire time with slavs/greek/arabs/ mesopotamian cultures/DNA but still cultures carrying a lot of similarity in daylife with beliefs/definitions/logic/respectfully rules etc... Between turks,mongols,uzbek,turkmen as i said while turks similarities between Japan are %5 percent, mongol and japan can be more such as %10-15 and korean betwen japan can be %20-25 but korean and mongol can be %10-15 etc...
Avrupalıların forumlarından kopyalayıp gelmişsin afferin. Türkler ve Moğollar ortak atadan gelmiyor, Türkler daha çok İskitler'in torunlarıdır. İlk Türkler Andronova kültüründe görülür. İlk Türklerin çoğu beyaz ve badem gözlüydü. Doğuya gidildikçe moğollarla bir kısmı karıştı. Yapılan gen analizlerine göre Anadoluda hâlâ Göktürk gen benzerliği var ve kadim Hitit, Frig, Asur vb. Gibi halkların da genleri var. Avrupalılar bizi Yunan, Sami, Moğol göstermeye çalışıyor ve bu konuda baya gayretliler.
U have the real turkmens also like me
The mongols was tengerism and shamanizm i think turks got mixed
I also believe that the Turks are descendants of the ancient Huns !
Turkish people did their thing with europeans. That's it
You're not right , turks are nomads , when they territories they take the peoples also , they build a empire , when you change climat they face change also.
Göcebe değil konar göçer.
Todays Turks in Turkey are mixed raced people, they have also slavic parts in them.
Xiongnu were mostly Turkic while at the same time period they went at it with the "Donghu" and later Xianbei who were mostly Mongolic and Tungusic.
Donhu means Southern Hu. 😊 All the northern nomads called by Hu.
Donghu means Eastern(Dong) and Hu(barbarian) lol You can literally look up "Donghu tribes" lol
@teovu5557 Yes, probably. So ? There is not such thing as Turkic in ancient Mongol. Tureg/ Mongol is not today's Turks, which are Indo-European people. Sorry, bro.
@@enkhzayazundui1063 youre weird. lol
@@teovu5557 I am Mongol. Not weird.
Turkics are Eastern Iranians.
look at the comments. everybody says that turks are originally part of their nation. the greatest war is the war against ignorance. Middle Eastern sharia victims and European so-called genetic scientists, who are not even aware of the groups called Oguz Turks and Kipchak Turks, are trying to decide which nation the Turks belong to.
the turks of anatolia are first and foremost the oghuz turks. the oghuz turks are a tribe that includes the turks and turkmens living today in anatolia, azerbaijan, the caucasus, the balkans, northern iran. it is even believed that the uyghur turks belong to the oghuz group. the kipchak turks are a group that includes kazaks, kyrgyz, uzbeks, tatars and other turks. Before the oghuz Turks migrated from asia, they lived in western asia. the kipchak Turks lived further east of them. since the Turks were spread over a wide geography in asia, the phenotypes in the east and west were already different due to geography. the oghuz Turks were never as slant-eyed or black-haired as the kipchak Turks. Today, over 300 million Turks still speak the same language. Kazakhs, Turkmen, Altai and Siberians speak the same Turkish. They speak a very different language than the Mongols you claim to be from them.
the turks living in anatolia today have mixed with the greeks, armenians and other natives of anatolia, which is the most common thing in the world, and their phenotypes are slightly different from their ancestors. when you look at the Yörük Turks who live in Turkey and mix less with Anatolian tribes, you can see the West and Central Asian phenotype. Among my friends, there are many people with slanted eyes and rosy cheeks. it is natural to think that an englishman living in england today is completely anglo saxon, or a german is completely Germanic, but when it comes to turks, everyone tries to claim that turks are not actually turks. it is a terrible lie.
Anatolian turks are still predominantly Caucasian, Western and Central Asian in character. it is a ridiculous claim that a nomadic turkish culture could come to anatolia and suppress the settled greek and armenian cultures. no one denies that we mixed with greeks and armenians, we respect all nations, but we still have predominantly turkish blood, culture and language. the fact that a handful of armenians and greeks are trying to decide where the turks belong as a result of hatred born out of longing for asia minor makes them look even more childish.
Are turks mix of Europeans and mangols.
They look caucasoid but may have some mangoloid ancestry.
It depends which turks you are talking about. Central asia (Turkestan) is the homeland for most of the turks. Turkish people in turkey is mixed with Armenians and greeks.
@@user-wp7kg6qw1g I think they are not white Caucasoid. They are 60 percent white Caucasoid, 40 percent mangoloid. Same thing is true in case of tartars. Some tartars,turks have caucasoid facial features. Culture and religion are important than race. We feel more connected with people who live like us. A Philippines muslim feels more connected with people in Saudi Arabia than with Christians in phillipines.
@@srikanthtupurani6316 it depends which turks you comparing.
Yakut
Karachay-cherkes,
Kabardino - bolkar,
Azeri,
Bashkirs,
Kumyks,
Tatars,
These all live in Russia.
There are 20-30 mln azeris live in Iran which are turkic people. They are similar just like azeri.
Gagauz turks look like ukrainian.
Uzbeks and Turkmans look like somewhat 30-40 east asian mongoloid
60-70 middle eastern mix with white people.
Kazakhs and Kyrgyzs look like mongolian.
So turks are widespread for 1000 years. Named people all speak turkic language but all look like different from one another.
As someone whos met turks in real life theyre more similar to other middle eastern countries, theyre more european than mongoloid even
Turkish in turkey genetically is 10% east eurasian/mongoloid, it is higher than expected, higher than some place in central asia
I find the term European offensive. Looks mean little and to infer Turks look European is feeble. Turks and Mongols genetically are distant, but their language structures are similar. Overall point, it matters not the differences - just the behaviors. And some of todays groups behave as evil as those that came before them. We should classify people based on behavior.
Anatolia was Anatolic land not Hellenic or Armenian also Turks look Turkic+Anatolian not Greek or Armenian
Greeks themselves don’t look Hellenic lol
I will drop a burnol here...
Your great great granddaddy is Greek why you mad at your ancestors lil Greek ?
Stop crying you turkified Greek lol 😂
My grandpa was a Turk (Giresun)
Ny grandma was a Mongolian.
My dad looked like a mongolian
And even i have mongolian blood in me .
Humans today have 32 teeth.
I have 36 (4 extra molers 1 on each side)
My iranien dentist sayd how can that be as a Dutch boy.
That only ancient people have.
Than my mom told the dentist his grandma was a mongolian.
Than the dentist sayd there its coming from mongolians never breeded with other races on the steppes.
So there dna didnt change much.
Years later i saw a tv program that confirmed what the dentist sayd.
This is not completely true. Yes, Turks have mixed with the different groups in Anatolia, however when some of the historical illustrations include Turkish people Turks are not drawn as slant-eyed but more caucasoid and in some you can see ginger-haired people. It is highly possible that the people near Lake Aral may not have been completely carrying the misconception of having excessive Asiatic features.
Sen kimsin ve bu saçma yalanları kimden öğrendin?
@@melisay12 doğrusu bu. oğuz türkleri zaten kıpçak türkleri kadar çekik gözlü ya da siyah saçlı değildi.
#Ask Abhijit are Jatts , some rajput clans belong to Hun tribe or central Asians??
kaishe jatt hai hai tujhe kaishe pata
Jatts are natives who originate in Balochistan or eastern Iran
Huns were Turkic people not ancestors of Mongols
Huns were actually Mongolian direct ancestors, there a lot of genetic and archeological studies which confirm this. Still to today we are far much more related to our Xiongnu ancestors then today Turkish people
@@barguttobed so call “Mongols”
The earliest reference to the Mongols classifies them as a Tang dynasty tribe of Shiwei during the eighth century. It was only after the fall of the Liao dynasty in 1125 that they became an important tribe on the Central Asian steppe, but tribal wars weakened their power over the ensuing century. During the thirteenth century, the term Mongol was used to refer to the Mongolic and Turkic tribes who fell under the control of Genghis Khan. The Mongols are primarily a shamanist society; their central deity is the sky god Tenger.
@@barguttobed Mongolians are mix of Turkic and Mongolic peoples that’s why kiddo🐙
@@papazataklaattiranimam And I can say Turkic are Mongolian Slab Grave culture mixed with East Iranic aka Sarmatians. Beside the science even in the shamanist priest Buryats and Mongols mention Xiongnu as ancestors but you don’t know anything about this cause Tengri is too far from your Islamic mind
@@papazataklaattiranimam Proto mongols Rourans litterally continuity of Xiongnu they descends from them
Haha... yes... Like it or not, contemporary Turks are a mix of Greeks, "Real" Turks, Armenians and Arabs. Deal with it 😎
"Bride Kidnapping" an Islamic practice? Can you show any documentary evidence of its normative practice in India as Muslims were in power for centuries. Not interested in isolated cases. That can be Hindu to Hindu, too.
Your wrong I am Turkic and my tribe is Qongrat it's mean Brown Horse the same tribe chengiz khan wife and his mother why chengiz Khan chose Qongrat because we have a warrior bloodline today we part of Kazakhstan Uzbekistan and Afghanistan also. In turkey we speak like oldest Turkic and we believe that god Allah in our language is tengi it's mean god and also we believe before Islam we was Muslim we was worship one and only Tengri the sky god (gok Tengri)
As a Serb, id say Turks are mostly greek and armenian but a little arab as well, also kurdish. They trend a little darker to me
Turks doesn't mean people of turkey and Azerbaijan.
It means the great turk race who migrated from central asian steppes and forms the people of different turk nations although they and Mongolian have same ancestor HUNS .
@@Bujbjjhfhhyfyvhvvyou guys Obsessed with turks DNA guess what the whole World is mixed
Turkish and mongols belong to the Altaic ethnic family
Hi bitopan please ei bapare aro kichu info chai turk r mongol der origin niye
Turk and Mongols have common ancestor then they split but in history there's a another time came when they two cousins had to meet with each other by that some Turks momgolified and most of the Mongols turkified.
They belongs to great uralic tribe came from Siberian steppes and forms the different ethnicity like Turks(later some of them mixed with Indo-European) Japanese(mixed up with hans) Siberian ulengov peoples, central American peoples and native Americans.
Today Turks have two tribes
Oghush turk( mixed with Indo-European) found in West Asian turkey Azerbaijan and Iran.
Kipchak turk( have no racial contamination) that's why they look like Mongols and Chinese.
The peoples in our northeast indian except Assam some are from the same Mongolian roots that's why they still practice religion similar tengeric religion and culture mostly the people of arunachal pradesh ...
@@Shemo-3700 Tatars dont look asian they look european more.
@@ordafles5360 bcz they're mixed up with east European ancestry
Turks are mixed with Indo-European. Mongols are not.
Turks have Arab and Persian blood also, only Greek and Armenian
Turks are: Arabs, Persians, Balkans, Armenians, Greeks and of course step people. You need to do more research sir. Also, there are plenty of Turks that look Asian and Arabic, just go to Turkeyi and you will see them everywhere.
@@Bujbjjhfhhyfyvhvv think about what you just said 🤔
Mongols are not Turks. Their languages have some similarities but they are not the same. Mongols are from Manchuria, the region above North Korea (what was known as Goguryeo, an ancient Korean kingdom). Manchus had different ethic groups like Xianbei and Donghu. Mongols are Xianbei and Donghu that migrated towards Mongolia.
They are Turks.
@@efootballunitedyt.4685 no they arent. Turk is not even a race like white, black, or asian. Turk simply refers to people that speak Turkic languages. Mongols don't speak Turkic languages. They are similar but not the same.
@@James-sn5mg culturally similar too. But are the Mongol people Chinese tribes then?? Their ancestors were Xianbei and i think Xianbei were nomadic Chinese tribes who were not Hans but other Chinese tribal people of the north.
@@efootballunitedyt.4685 Culture being similar has nothing to do with being the same. The Xiongnu and the Turks did influence the Mongol culture but that doesn't mean they are related by blood and DNA. Xianbei is Manchu.
@@James-sn5mg then who are the original Mongols. Were they some Tribal people of China (Non- Han Chinese)?? Where did they come from, that's what i asked.
Türkish , ozbek, Turkmen from Turkmenistan spaek the same , ozbek and Turkmen , turkish look the same these are Ogus tribes , the others are kipcak turks kazak , Kyrgyz tribes .
People like greeks, France they want write our history's but your wrong Indians are all Pakistanis
Uzbek don't look like Turkish people. Stop lying. Maybe Tajiks living in Uzbekistan can look like Anatolian Turkish. Uzbeks look closer to Kazakhs, Hazaras and Uyghurs.
Wrong. Turkik people are different from Mongolian people. Mughals were of Mongolic origin. Turkik people are not. in fact Turkik tribes fought against Mongols.
What is turkey?😮😮😮
When people say Turks , they only think of Turkey 🇹🇷 lol 😂
Very ignorant
There are many other Turks some who look like Chinese or East Asian and some who are mixed and some who are still original Turkic look of Siberian like Yakuts
Yakuts don’t represent original Turkic looking
@@papazataklaattiranimam Well Turks were central /North Asian and still are . Their homeland is Mongolia and further east they were similar to mongols , Chinese Etc
The Turkish people in modern state of Turkey are no different than Iranian people who also have Turkish dna
@@papazataklaattiranimam There is not “Turkic” look since y’all have different DNA and appearance turkic is purely linguistic term
@@barguttobed Altai and Khakas represent original Turkic looking as well as many Mongolized Turkic peoples.
@@barguttobed it is actually an ethno-linguistic concept such as Tai, Indic, Sinitic, Tungusic or Germanic etc.
Whereas Mongol used to mean army of Genghis Khan not Mongolic
Turks are originally from the Scythian tribes. I am a Khazar, which used to be known as Athegary while we were part of the Scythian empire. We are Indo-Europeans, and originally, red haired and blue eyed. We are related to the Celtic people. When we started to move East, we encountered people who wer a mix of Europeans and Asians, and we mixed with them. When we got to Mongolia, we mixed with them. And by the time we came back to Europe, we were definitely Eurasian people. But we are NOT, of the same descent as MONGOLIANS, but who by now and over thousands of years of mixing together are definitely a brother group to us.
Sythian are not Turks. White people are not Turks. You caucasian looking people trying to larp as Turkic horse nomads from steppes are delusional.
Khazars were Jewish Turks. Are you from Israel?
@@kronicturbo8327 Old Chinese sources don't say that.
Not accurate
@@kronicturbo8327 Thats very rude.
Anatolia was Armenian as well
Partially, the eastern side of Anatolia was Armenian
Anatolia 🇬🇷🇦🇲🇮🇷
Turkic funny race😂😂😂
But Turks still look like Magnolias in central Asia countries. Also people of today's Turkey are a mix of Turks, Europeans, Persian and Arabs.
This is wrong. This is the wrong history written by Europeans. We are descendants of the white Scythians. People living in Anatolia mostly have Turkish genes besides ancient Anatolian peoples genes.
@@luxeffere Most modern Anatolian Turks have only about 5%-10% Northeast Asian DNA in average. In contrast, Kazakhs have about 70%-80% Northeast Asian DNA. Kazakhs are also a Turkic people. The Turkic Yakuts have about 90% Northeast Asian DNA.
Thus today's Anatolian Turks as phenotype and genotype are closer to their neighbors
The root of East Asians, such as Chinese, Koreans, or Japanese, but also Northeast Asians, Siberians as well as Southeast Asians, Pacific Islanders and Native Americans, can be traced back to the “Ancestral East Asians” (also known as Basal-East Asians or basal East-Eurasians “bEE”).
The ANEA/The Northern East Asian can be differentiated into broadly four sub-groups, namely the “Ancient Northeast Asians“ (ANA), “Neo-Siberians", "West Liao River farmers", and "Yellow River farmers".
Turkic, Mongolian, Tungusic, Korean, Japanese, Native American，they share the same ancestor - Ancient Northeast Asians, ANA and the Yellow River farmers (Han Chinese) are derived from the same ancestor - ancient North-East Asians
This is the reason why they look alike
A 2023 study published in the Journal of Systematics and Evolution analyzed the DNA of Empress Ashina, a royal Göktürk, whose remains were recovered from a mausoleum in Xianyang, China. The authors determined that Empress Ashina belonged to the North-East Asian mtDNA haplogroup F1d. Approximately 96-98% of her autosomal ancestry was of Ancient Northeast Asian origin, while roughly 2-4% was of West Eurasian origin, indicating ancient admixture
The authors state that their results are consistent with a North-East Asian origin of the royal Ashina family and the Göktürk Khanate.This study weakened the Indo-Iranian hypothesis of Ashina tribe. However, they also noted that central-steppe Türks and early medieval Türks exhibit a high (but variable) degree of West Eurasian ancestry, which indicates that there was genetic sub-structure within the Türkic empire. For example, the ancestry of early medieval Turks was derived from Ancient Northeast Asians for about 62% of their genome, while the remaining 38% was derived from West Eurasians (BMAC and Afanasievo), with the admixture occurring around the year 500 CE.
West Eurasian ancestry in the Türks combined Sarmatian-related and BMAC ancestry, while the East Eurasian ancestry was related to Ancient Northeast Asians
The ancient Türkic royal family of the Göktürk Khaganate was found to share genetic affinities to post-Iron Age Tungusic and Mongolic pastoralists, while having heterogeneous relationships towards various Turkic-speaking groups, suggesting genetic heterogeneity and multiple sources of origin for the population of the Turkic empire. According to the authors, these findings "once again validates a cultural diffusion model over a demic diffusion model for the spread of Turkic languages" and refutes "the western Eurasian origin and multiple origin hypotheses" in favor of an East Asian origin for the royal Ashina family.
They are a mix of Northeast Asians (share genetic affinities to Tungusic and Mongolic pastoralists) and Indo-Iranian
These Turkified Indo-Iranians in turn assimilated the Anatolians（share genetic affinities to Greeks, Lebanese, Caucasians, Armenians...）
@@user-rn6nb2ey7e Because Kıpchak tribe mixed with east asian populations and there are test that match with Turkish peoples and Turkic peoples dna but you still are gonna claim that Turkics were Chinese looking so is that why in the old Chinese sources Chinese people said Turkic people don't look like us?
@@ordafles5360 The Transeurasian language family that includes Japanese, Korean, Mongolian, Turkish, and Tungusic languages has had its origins traced back 9000 years, to early farming communities in what is now north-east China, according to a report published in the journal Nature that ‘triangulates’ genetics, archaeology, and linguistics in a unified perspective.
A very small minority of people in Turkey carry genetic markers that are also found in Mongolia, Korean, Janpanese .
Turkic peoples never became a majority in Anatolia, even up to the present day. The Turks of today are the historic Anatolians who have simply taken on a Turkish identity as they had previously taken on a Greek identity.
Using linguistic, archeological and genetic evidence, an international team of researchers from Asia, Europe, New Zealand, Russia and the U.S. found that the languages can be traced back to the beginning of millet cultivation in China’s West Liao River. Over time, these millet farmers - who belong to the Amur gene pool - migrated to neighboring regions and left their descendants admixing with other populations.
Whether the five languages descended from one common ancestor has long been a subject of debate. However, recent studies have shown “a reliable core of evidence” supporting the theory, the researchers said.
The spread of the languages reportedly involved two major phases. The first phase, which occurred in the early to middle Neolithic Ages, saw the spread of Amur-related millet farmers in the West Liao River to contiguous regions. The second phase, which occurred in the late Neolithic, Bronze and Iron Ages, saw the mixture of their descendants with Yellow River, western Eurasian and Jomon people. During this period, they also started farming rice and western Eurasian crops in addition to raising livestock.
A qualitative analysis using data from 250 vocabulary concepts in 98 Transeurasian languages allowed the researchers to identify which words emerged in particular regions at a particular time. For instance, ancestral languages that separated during the Neolithic Age -- the final division of the Stone Age -- used words related to millets but not other crops.
Aside from linguistic analysis, the researchers studied data from 255 archaeological sites in northern China, Japan, Korea and the Primorye in Far East Russia. They also conducted genome analyses of 19 ancient individuals from Korea, Kyushu, the Amur and the Ryukyus and combined them with existing data on those who lived in north and east Asia between 9,500 and 300 years ago.
@@ordafles5360 Black South Africans also speak English. Are their ancestors Anglo-Saxons?
The modern Turkish people are just Turkified Greeks, Kurds, Iranians ...🤣🤣
Today's people of Central Asia are a mix of Iranic and Turkic peoples and today's Turkiye is a mix of Native Anatolian, Iranic, Turkic, Baltic, Arabic, Caucasian peoples.
Iranic peoples were the original inhabitants of Central Asia from the proto Indo Europeans peoples that came out of the Ukraine area.
These Iranic peoples were lighter skinned with colored hair and eyes. They were known as the Scythians . They were all known for their pointy long and sometimes very decorative hats.
As a result of Turkic peoples expansion, Turks who were a primarily East Asian peoples moved out of the Eastern Kazakhstan/Western Mongolian and into Central Asia
These Turkic peoples began to assimilate with the Iranic locals of Central Asia. Thats why today Central Asian have this caucasian/oriental phenotype.
The Central Asian genetic makeup is a composition of early Iranic peoples and later Turkic arrivals. Mainly Uzbeks, Turkmens, Tajiks, Uyghurs posses varying ratios of this Turkic-Iranic admixture
As the Oghuz Turk peoples (who are now a mix of Turkic and Iranic) expanded into the Iranian plateau under the Seljuk Empire and eventually migrated further west into Asia Minor. As a result of the Mongol invasions of Iran, many Seljuks fled Iran entirely for Anatolia
In Asia Minor these Oghuz peoples assimilated with the local Anatolians that made up a combination of Ancient Greek ，Armenians and Kurdish peoples
During Ottoman Empire many different peoples arrived into Anatolia as part of the Ottoman recruitment including Baltic peoples, Arabs, Caucasian peoples etc and further mixed the population
The homeland of early proto-Turkic peoples is in Northeast Asia, specifically along the Liao river region. The later Turkic homeland stretched from the Liao river in Northeast Asia through Mongolia up to the Baikal lake.
Proto-Turks probably around 97% Northeast Asian ancestry on average.
The Medieval Turks derived (on average) around 62,2% from these Ancient Northeast Asians, associated with the spread of Turkic languages, 27,1% from Sintashta or Afanasievo, associated with the spread of Indo-European languages, and 10,7% from the BMAC, Neolithic Iranians.
First, the Turks assimilated some Saka, Scythians, Sogdians.....Shaped the Eurasian race (Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, Turkmens)
Then,these Turkified Indo-Iranian speakers entered Anatolia, killed and assimilated the Byzantines ( Anatonians，Armenians, Greeks.....）
Now, lots of Anatonians worshiped their “turkic dad ”and slaughtered their blood brothers.....What irony!
Turkics and Mongolics are different. They dont share same ancestory. They had similiar cultures bc of same shared geograhpy. Since their culture are similiar people taught that they were one people which is wrong. Modern linguists are saying that Mongolic and Turkic do not share same origin.
U forgot about the Kurds in Anatolia.
Turks converted to islam but never ever practice islam from day one till today.
Doesn't matter they ruined civilizations by spreading it... especially in Indian subcontinent
Completely false.
@@Glowxity1234 can you mention one famous Muslim scholar from Turkey ?
@@Karla_1987 Said Nursi سيد نورس his books are Risalah noor رساله نور. his books were translated in all languages incuding Arabic. but orginal books are Turkish.
@@Karla_1987 Turkish orginal islamic فقه scholars in history.
1.EBÛ MUTI’ EL-HAKEM B.MESLEME B.ABDÜRAHMAN
B. EL-BELHİ
2.EBÛ’L-FAZL MUHAMMED B. MUHAMMED B. AHMED
B. ABDULLAH EL-MERVEZÎ
3.EBÛ CA’FER MUHAMMED B. ABDULLAH B.
MUHAMMED EL-BELHİ
4.AHMED B. MUHAMMED B. MUHAMMED B. MAHMUD
EL-GAZNEVÎ
5.EBÛ CA’FER MUHAMMED 5.EBÛ CA’FER MUHAMMED BAYKENDİ
6.EBÛ HAFS ÖMER B.MUHAMMED EN-NESEFÎ
7.EL-HÜSEYN B. EL-HIDIR B. MUHAMMED B. YUSUF EN- NESEFÎ
8.EBÛ CA’FER MUHAMMED B. AHMED B. ABDÜ’L-AZİZ
EL-BUHÂRÎ
9.MUHAMMED B. AHMED B. ABDÜ’L-AZİZ B. ÖMER B.
MÂZA EL-BUHÂRİ
10.EBÛ ZEYD ABDULLAH B. ÖMER B. İSA ED-DEBÛSÎ
11.EBÛ’L-LEYS NASR B. MUHAMMED B. AHMED B.
İBRAHİM ES-SEMERKANDÎ
12.EBÛ BEKR MUHAMMED B. AHMED ES-SEMERKANDÎ
13.FATIMA HÂTUN BİNT-İ EBÛ BEKR ALÂUDDİN
MUHAMMED B. AHMED ES-SEMERKANDÎ
14.EBÛ’L-HUSEYN ALİ B. EL-HASEN B. MUHAMMED ES- SOĞDÎ
15.EBÛ BEKR MUHAMMED B. ALİ B. İSMAİL EL-KEFFAL
EŞ-ŞÂŞÎ
16.EBÛ’L-HASEN EL-KÂSIM EBÛ BEKR B. MUHAMMED
B. ALİ B. İSMAİL EŞ-ŞÂŞÎ
17.ALİ B. MUHAMMED B. İSMAİL B. ALİ B. AHMED EL- İSBİCÂBÎ
18.MUHAMMED B. MUHMUD B. EL- HÜSEYN EY- UŞRUSENÎ
19.ALÂU’D-DİN EBÛ BEKR MESUD B. AHMED B. EL- KÂSÂNÎ
20.EBÛ’L-HASAN ALİ B. EBÛBEKR B. ABDÜ’L-CELİL EL- MERGİNÂNÎ
21.EBÛ ABDULLAH MUHAMMED B. MUHAMMED
ÖMER EL-AHSİKESÎ
22.EBÛ ABDULLAH MUHAMMED B. MUSA EL- BALASAGUNÎ
23.EBÛ BEKR MUHAMMED B. MUSA. MUHAMMED EL- HAREZMÎ
24.EBÛ’L-ABBAS AHMED B. İSMAİL B.AHMED ET- TİMURTÂŞÎ
25.EBÜ’R-RECÂ MUHTAR B. MAHMUD B. MUHAMMED
EZ-ZÂHİDİ EL-GAZMÎNÎ