The PlayStation just does 3D much better here, keeping 30 fps all the way, with 3D rendering features like light sourcing, and gouraud shading absent on the Saturn.
The Sega Saturn actually handled gouraud shading with lighting effects... NiGHTs into Dreams, Fighting Vipers, Fighters Megamix, Burning Rangers handled these features too... albeit Burning Rangers ended up rushed due to pressure to make next gen games by mid 1997. basically the Sony PlayStation had no other 3d addon their devs to waste their time on... they focused only on Sony PlayStation hardware... hell even Gran Turismo took two full years for Polyphony Digital to code it in secrecy... Sega instead had Sega of America not wanting to stfu and put their two cents into Project Saturn since 1993... they got their way with the 32X so they only cared about that... As for Sega Saturn they forced Knuckles Chaotix to be a 32X exclusive while they shoved Bug! down 1995 Sega Saturn early adopters... Clockwork Knight was a better game than Bug! btw... so was Astal. and many other Japanese Saturn games released in 1995 Japan that were intentionally being rejected by SoA. SoA didn't want to support the 1MB ram Cartridge nor the 4MB ram Cartridge...had they at least bothered to support the 4MB ram Cartridge in 1997, that would have given the Sega Saturn devs in Japan better chances of supporting it after all by late 1996 there was over 6 to 7 million Sega Saturn consoles sold in Japan alone... mostly because of Virtua Fighter 1 in 94 and later because of VF2... Sakura Wars and many other pure 2d graphics and even 3d graphics games on Saturn were being rejected by Sega of America who were just putting pressure to kill Saturn and make next gen like spoiled children lemmings
These are completely different games. The Sega Saturn game is actually titled "Initial D: Koudou Saisoku Densetsu" and it came out a year before the Playstation game, which was the next game in the series.
I own and have played both of these games. Although the PS1 version has much better visuals, the car physics are kinda strange. It's one of those racers where the steering doesn't feel like it's coming from the front tires but rather from the center of the car. The Saturn version plays better with good steering and a nice power slide mechanic that can be mastered via a mix of shifting and hand braking. However, I found that the outside guard rails can be spammed to drive up against and sling your car around sharp corners maybe faster than proper sliding. This unbalanced game physic was an unfortunate discovery. Nevertheless, neither version of this game is exceptional or even above average, in my opinion. They're both mediocre at best.
I found exactly this between the V Rally games on Dreamcast vs PS1. PS1 steering feels like the car isn't turning, but rather the whole car is floating left or right, I didn't like it.
That's haha what I was thinking too but Saturn colors but ps1 graphics ^o^ (●￣(工)￣●)⊂(￣(ｴ)￣)⊃( • ̀ω•́ )ฅ(๑*▽*๑)ฅ!!d=(´▽｀)=b(*'▽'*)♪٩(๑~▽~๑)۶d=(´▽｀)=b٩(๑~▽~๑)۶ヾ(¯∇￣๑)٩(๑~▽~๑)۶ヾ(¯∇￣๑)٩(๑~▽~๑)۶ヾ(¯∇￣๑)٩(๑~▽~๑)۶( ^▽^)σ)~O~)＼(￣▽￣;)／ヽ（´∀｀）ノ＼(￣▽￣;)／ヽ（´∀｀）ノv(=∩_∩=)ﾌノ(・ω・)ノ`(*∩_∩*)′ノ(・ω・)ノ`(*∩_∩*)′↖(^ω^)↗\( ö )/(´⊙ω⊙`)\( ö )/ノ(・ω・)ノ\( ö )/↖(^ω^)↗`(*∩_∩*)′ʕ•ﻌ•ʔ~_~≧ω≦~_~^o^>_
Por incrível que pareça, eu zerei e me diverti muito com a versão de saturno. Um detalhe legal, é que ela aceita o controle 3d. Fica bem melhor pra jogar... Like
They are completely different games, but both look interesting. Thankfully I love both consoles :) BTW can you compare some strategy games for this systems? Like Sim City 2000, Command & Conquer, and Warcraft 2
@DaNes200581 Plus it's got less lighting on purpose. You're driving on a Mountain at night with headlamps mostly by the Starting straight. Like the Anime
This is a great example of the late-era PSX games that looked fantastic. Sony's development tools enabled programmers to kick up the system's performance another notch, and you can see this in many of the latter software titles like Gran Turismo 2, Tony Hawk Pro Skater and Spyro. The Saturn version is clearly behind, certainly matching what you'd see in 1995-1997, but now really starting to fall behind. Moreover, Genki were the developers, so you can't blame the programmers. These were good coders who knew the hardware; they weren't as good as Sega's internal teams, but they always did a good job on Saturn and Dreamcast. That said, I think the Saturn's lighting looks pretty good. You're basically driving in the dark and can barely see aside from the headlights, which is a nice effect. The speed is also very quick and smooth, and that's the most important thing for any racing videogame. It compares very well to Cave's High Velocity and King of Spirits 2 on Saturn, but not at the level of Sega Rally, the system's best racer. Playstation version has much better lighting effects for the headlights (the replays look great), and the graphics are a bit brighter so you can see more of the road. The colors and details are either smoother or washed out, depending on your personal take. The car models are a bit more refined and the speed is rock solid. Overall, Sony gets an easy win, but I'd be happy to play both versions and I'd probably enjoy both of them.
"the late-era PSX games that looked fantastic" I do not find at all, the resolution is often bad, hidden by unnecessary graphic effects ... I find the graphic style of the latest PS1 games rather dirty.
the graphic is a little bit better on the play and that light model seems fantastic, but even if just an excuse to mask the draw distance, i must say that, they were running at night and on the saturn it feels it's night while on the ps1 feels more like a stormy weather...
Genki was the developer in both projects? JAM in PSX Genki on SAT These two games, excluding the title, are not the same (like so many games on 16 bit era that had "same name", but are "different game", made many times for different companies). Some comparisons are out of the balance... But hey, thanks for the video!
I play these games a lot, the saturn version is so much better, maybe not to look at but gameplay-wise and course layout its leaps and bouds ahead of the ps1 game.
Let's compare two games not developed by the same developer, not released at the same date, and draw conclusions. Saturn version is actually pretty well made for the console.
As artes das cutscenes do Saturn são mais fiéis ao anime, mas os efeitos de iluminação do PS1 durante o gameplay fez o jogo ficar graficamente mais bonito. Para ficar perfeito só faltaram as músicas eurobeat.
Sega only needed another year to improve, but by then Sony had so much backing there was no way to stop it. I feel like they just spat out this game during Saturn's launch.
Sega didn't need another year, they needed loyal management staff at Sega of America because Tom Kalinske betrayed Sega by forcing his 32X... that 32X is what drained resources away from the Sega Saturn. After that and Kalinske further sabotage of the Sega Saturn during 1995 snd early 1996 you end up with Bernie Stolar who never should have been hired by Sega Japan especially when he was fired from Sony. Stolar intentionally rejected and ignored a massive amount of Japanese Sega Saturn exclusives and refused to approve them for Western release by making up a bunch of b.s. reasons which was similar to what Kalinske was doing but worse. With a different management staff at Sega of America, no 32X and support for the 1MB and 4MB ram Cartridge games in the Western world, we'd have a longer term difference... and no Dreamcast so no bankruptcy from premature hardware jump
PlayStation's hardware was always light years ahead of Saturn for 3D games and by the point this game released there were a bunch of coders really adept at making it sing. It's actually a really good looking game on PlayStation and makes the Saturn version look from a previous generation
It's very true. On paper Saturn had better hardware but in practice Sony's machine was far better set up for 3D games and far more accessible. Power is nothing without control as a famous ad once put it, and there aren't many better examples than the story of Saturn v PlayStation.
Many games prooves the exact opposite. A lot, most first party games are graphically equivalent of their PS counterpart. multiplateform games are not the best exemple to compare the 3D graphics powers of both systems. Like you said PS is more accessible for a developer and no one spend more money and times for a less successfull system. But games like Virtua Fighter 2 or Nights for exemple can't be on PS with the same resolution or backgrounds colors. Games like exhumed, Duke Nukem3D, Street Racer or Grandia have better Saturn versions. If you know the saturn library as well a i know it you will see that the facts are here.
I preempted your reply already. You aren't saying anything new. I acknowledged that Saturn's _theoretical_ performance is better than PlayStation's. The fact remains only a tiny handful of games, usually Sega ones with the budget and insider advantage got anywhere close to proving the potential of the hardware. By 1998 most other developers had completely given up on Saturn while high profile PS1 games kept coming all the way into 2000 and beyond. Raw power *ISN'T THE ONLY FACTOR* when talking about comparing system performance and never has been. The coding environment and software tools are a massive factor. PlayStation's best results on lots of retail games comfortably match the best released teeny number of games on Saturn despite the hardware differences. PlayStation was always far better for the vast majority of developers in creating fully realised 3D rendered games, and the machine itself was far less expensive to work with and indeed to manufacture. Sony nailed it from the hardware to the software. Sega screwed up both. In this sense it was light years ahead of Saturn and it was the console that revolutionised the gaming industry, while Saturn died a quick death.
i didn't speack about theoretical, i don't care about system's architectures. i speack about games and there's lot of games during all the Saturn lifespan who are largely same graphically than PS. You are right, the Playstation change the gaming industry, infortunatly, not in the better way ....
The cutscenes are both nightmare fuel. The lighting and models look better on PlayStation but they're somewhat blurry. The Saturn version is very crisp though.
Looks like two different games on two different generations of hardware. There is no denying the ps1 architecture was a 3d beast. I prefer the saturn, but ps1 3d for the most part was as if its hardware was a good couple years ahead of the saturn. There's no doubt this was the major factor that lead to the saturns demise.
Claramente superior no ps1. Efeitos de iluminação dos farois na pista muito mais fiel ao original. O degradê pra tentar simular o mesmo efeito, ficou feio no Saturn. O PS1 tb ganha na modelagem do carro, os polígonos quebram menos que no Saturn.
I'd say PS1 wins in terms of detail. You can see the headlights on the car etc. Also it just looks realistic overall. PS1, steady framerate. The PS1 does cover up the pop in better too though the view angle seems to be poor on the PS1,. I do like the view of the Saturn better, it helps to see what's ahead while driving.
Knowing Akina Very Well. I can say that the Sega Saturn is very Accurate while the PS1 game just slams in a load of recognisable places from the anime.
That's not true, it can, developers just didn't spend time getting it done...but if you look up hellslave saturn, you will see what kind of lighting the console is actually capable of.
It's obvious that PS1 is better by far, no one can deny that fact BUT there's something that really pisses me off and that's the Saturn could render that game so much better than it was made. Sonic R is the ultimate example to support this statement. What a shame, Saturn was an incredible power house but Sega screwed up big time.
I've never been a fanboy and I think both consoles produced some amazing games in the hands of good developers, and both consoles produced good enough looking graphics when effort was put in. These both look like a fun time.
it looks like sega rosso took more inspiration for arcade stage from the saturn version than from the ps1 version despite it being the worse of the two, which works for me cause arcade stage is fire
Salve UA-camr,passando por aqui para apoiar seu trabalho e deixar meu forte apoio e claro meu like,eu aqui acabei te achando e vendo seus vídeos,tb tenho um canal que é de games e sempre estou postando algo kkkk,se der passa por lá e ativa o sininho se gostar blz e gracias
Even though ps1 looks more realistic, it seems darker and harder to see. That was one thing I disliked about ridge racer type 4, too dark. So judging by this video id rather try it for saturn.
O jogo de Saturn parece quase um tech demo comparado ao jogo de PS1. Falta acabamento em tudo. Parece que criaram uma engine que rodava em um framerate decente e acharam que já estava bom e decidiram lançar o jogo de qualquer maneira. Uma pena. A única parte boa da versão de Saturn é que o controle é bem melhor. Pra jogar por mais tempo, a versão de Saturn vale mais a pena, mas o visual é muito piorado. Ainda fizeram o jogo na resolução mais baixa... Drift King, por exemplo, é MUITO melhor do que isso aí.
Well, no brainer here, PS1 all the way. Neither seem as fast as the Arcade i tried (i believe it was the 2002 ver) but even the ps1 version looks more modern than the arcade was, do to the 3D.
Was about to try the Saturn version, but nope. The car doesnt even drift, dont get the point of that. And graphically as others say, they look a generation apart.
PS1 has better lighting, colors, and resolution. I don't see any visual advantages on the Sega Saturn. Saturn version does have a more cartoony look which goes with the cartoony cutscenes.
I Love those 2 games. but I have to say the PSone is better. the Special Stage version that's on PlayStation 2 & PlayStation 3, those has to be my A-1 Favorites.
Sonic The Hedgehog PSP street stage I almost match my Stage 3 arcade times. It's almost perfect you should check it out on ppsspp. Ps3 was too floaty for me with stage 4 physics
For sure, man. I played it before on ppsspp. It was still incredible on the PSP version. I have to agree on the stage 4 physics. If only it was like "Gran Turismo" or "Sega GT" Simulated type of physics.
Diferença absurda a favor do psx, mesmo entendendo que o saturn seria inferior ao que tange processamento 3d, ainda assim creio que houve uma deficiência na portabilidade para o saturn, talvez levando em conta o hardware complexo do mesmo.
a diferença é de uma geração. Alias, os consoles da Sega sempre tiveram disso ou eles faziam jogos espetaculares e competitivos, ou eles conseguiam fazer um jogo praticamente intragável isso vem desde da época do Master, Genesis Sega Saturn e talvez só foi corrigido no Dreamcast. Massacre do PS1.
O jogo é mais bonito no Playstation, mas acho que o Saturn faz um trabalho decente sim. O jogo é bonito no Saturn, graficamente no quesito corrido talvez só perde pro Sega Rally.
PS1 with its 8 bit goraud shading and dithering looks specially better on darker environments like these. Saturn is supposed to be dark but it isn't dark, just the skybox is black. Switch that for a white one and it makes no difference.
Quando um jogo é inferior no playstation,é porque o playstation é ruim. Quando um jogo é inferior no saturn,é culpa da produtora que não soube programar. Seguistas odeiam o playstation.
The artworks in the Saturn version look like they have been drawn by five year olds... 7:56 that facial expression of the driver xD Thats how propably most Saturn owners looked at the game if they saw the Playstation version first :D :D :D
I know that Initial D is known for their 3D Rendered sequences, but man that PS1 game took it like if it was all 3D.
Thanks alot
Goodnight
The PlayStation just does 3D much better here, keeping 30 fps all the way, with 3D rendering features like light sourcing, and gouraud shading absent on the Saturn.
Right
The Sega Saturn actually handled gouraud shading with lighting effects... NiGHTs into Dreams, Fighting Vipers, Fighters Megamix, Burning Rangers handled these features too... albeit Burning Rangers ended up rushed due to pressure to make next gen games by mid 1997.
basically the Sony PlayStation had no other 3d addon their devs to waste their time on... they focused only on Sony PlayStation hardware...
hell even Gran Turismo took two full years for Polyphony Digital to code it in secrecy...
Sega instead had Sega of America not wanting to stfu and put their two cents into Project Saturn since 1993... they got their way with the 32X so they only cared about that...
As for Sega Saturn they forced Knuckles Chaotix to be a 32X exclusive while they shoved Bug! down 1995 Sega Saturn early adopters... Clockwork Knight was a better game than Bug! btw... so was Astal. and many other Japanese Saturn games released in 1995 Japan that were intentionally being rejected by SoA.
SoA didn't want to support the 1MB ram Cartridge nor the 4MB ram Cartridge...had they at least bothered to support the 4MB ram Cartridge in 1997, that would have given the Sega Saturn devs in Japan better chances of supporting it after all by late 1996 there was over 6 to 7 million Sega Saturn consoles sold in Japan alone... mostly because of Virtua Fighter 1 in 94 and later because of VF2... Sakura Wars and many other pure 2d graphics and even 3d graphics games on Saturn were being rejected by Sega of America who were just putting pressure to kill Saturn and make next gen like spoiled children lemmings
Cool Logo they Made some Awesome Games back in the day
@@apollosungod2819 I think Sega of Japan knows better than Sega of America in terms of Sega Saturn.
These are completely different games. The Sega Saturn game is actually titled "Initial D: Koudou Saisoku Densetsu" and it came out a year before the Playstation game, which was the next game in the series.
I like the artwork in the Saturn version more, but the PS version looks much nicer during races, albeit kind of dark.
I own and have played both of these games. Although the PS1 version has much better visuals, the car physics are kinda strange. It's one of those racers where the steering doesn't feel like it's coming from the front tires but rather from the center of the car. The Saturn version plays better with good steering and a nice power slide mechanic that can be mastered via a mix of shifting and hand braking. However, I found that the outside guard rails can be spammed to drive up against and sling your car around sharp corners maybe faster than proper sliding. This unbalanced game physic was an unfortunate discovery. Nevertheless, neither version of this game is exceptional or even above average, in my opinion. They're both mediocre at best.
Racing
I found exactly this between the V Rally games on Dreamcast vs PS1. PS1 steering feels like the car isn't turning, but rather the whole car is floating left or right, I didn't like it.
imagine if they had square make a game?
What if someone made a mix of both of these games
The PS1 opening , the Saturn cutscenes , the PS1 loading times and PS1 gameplay
Good idea.
That's haha what I was thinking too but Saturn colors but ps1 graphics ^o^ (●￣(工)￣●)⊂(￣(ｴ)￣)⊃( • ̀ω•́ )ฅ(๑*▽*๑)ฅ!!d=(´▽｀)=b(*'▽'*)♪٩(๑~▽~๑)۶d=(´▽｀)=b٩(๑~▽~๑)۶ヾ(¯∇￣๑)٩(๑~▽~๑)۶ヾ(¯∇￣๑)٩(๑~▽~๑)۶ヾ(¯∇￣๑)٩(๑~▽~๑)۶( ^▽^)σ)~O~)＼(￣▽￣;)／ヽ（´∀｀）ノ＼(￣▽￣;)／ヽ（´∀｀）ノv(=∩_∩=)ﾌノ(・ω・)ノ`(*∩_∩*)′ノ(・ω・)ノ`(*∩_∩*)′↖(^ω^)↗\( ö )/(´⊙ω⊙`)\( ö )/ノ(・ω・)ノ\( ö )/↖(^ω^)↗`(*∩_∩*)′ʕ•ﻌ•ʔ~_~≧ω≦~_~^o^>_
and saturn maps cuz those are more accurate
After work
You know these two Initial D games are different.
PlayStation wins hands down. Better graphics, smoother performance, and additional media in content in FMV videos.
hababacon the playstation one was like a battle gear 2 game
Yes, but on Sega really Akina Downhill and old anime style in cut-scene)))
Oh, and on PS very hard driving))
youre here again, so talkative
Talk game good
Wow! PS version truly represented Initial D!
Por incrível que pareça, eu zerei e me diverti muito com a versão de saturno. Um detalhe legal, é que ela aceita o controle 3d. Fica bem melhor pra jogar... Like
They are completely different games, but both look interesting. Thankfully I love both consoles :)
BTW can you compare some strategy games for this systems? Like Sim City 2000, Command & Conquer, and Warcraft 2
same
Game
poor draw distance on saturn no excuse for that.
Saturn vers looks a generation behind sadly. No lighting at all, poor textures and horrible draw distance :(
The car is Gouraud-shaded, but that's it.
Yeah, It looks like is on the Nintendo Original DS port :(
@DaNes200581 Plus it's got less lighting on purpose. You're driving on a Mountain at night with headlamps mostly by the Starting straight. Like the Anime
@@sonicthejetsetbeat7465 DS is more powerful than both...
This is a great example of the late-era PSX games that looked fantastic. Sony's development tools enabled programmers to kick up the system's performance another notch, and you can see this in many of the latter software titles like Gran Turismo 2, Tony Hawk Pro Skater and Spyro. The Saturn version is clearly behind, certainly matching what you'd see in 1995-1997, but now really starting to fall behind. Moreover, Genki were the developers, so you can't blame the programmers. These were good coders who knew the hardware; they weren't as good as Sega's internal teams, but they always did a good job on Saturn and Dreamcast.
That said, I think the Saturn's lighting looks pretty good. You're basically driving in the dark and can barely see aside from the headlights, which is a nice effect. The speed is also very quick and smooth, and that's the most important thing for any racing videogame. It compares very well to Cave's High Velocity and King of Spirits 2 on Saturn, but not at the level of Sega Rally, the system's best racer.
Playstation version has much better lighting effects for the headlights (the replays look great), and the graphics are a bit brighter so you can see more of the road. The colors and details are either smoother or washed out, depending on your personal take. The car models are a bit more refined and the speed is rock solid.
Overall, Sony gets an easy win, but I'd be happy to play both versions and I'd probably enjoy both of them.
"the late-era PSX games that looked fantastic" I do not find at all, the resolution is often bad, hidden by unnecessary graphic effects ... I find the graphic style of the latest PS1 games rather dirty.
Ps2 game
the graphic is a little bit better on the play and that light model seems fantastic, but even if just an excuse to mask the draw distance, i must say that, they were running at night and on the saturn it feels it's night while on the ps1 feels more like a stormy weather...
Sega Saturn 1998
PlayStation 1999.
Sega Saturn (June 25, 1998)
Playstation (January 7, 1999)
*difference of months = 6*
Í....
6 month is long time in video games evolution ....
yes, but 6 months =/= 1 year
Genki was the developer in both projects?
JAM in PSX
Genki on SAT
These two games, excluding the title, are not the same (like so many games on 16 bit era that had "same name", but are "different game", made many times for different companies).
Some comparisons are out of the balance...
But hey, thanks for the video!
I'm not being a fanboy but I just prefer how the Saturn version looks and the play speed.
Running in the 90s
MAX POWER,( 2X)
Running in the Late 90s
I play these games a lot, the saturn version is so much better, maybe not to look at but gameplay-wise and course layout its leaps and bouds ahead of the ps1 game.
Let's compare two games not developed by the same developer, not released at the same date, and draw conclusions. Saturn version is actually pretty well made for the console.
As artes das cutscenes do Saturn são mais fiéis ao anime, mas os efeitos de iluminação do PS1 durante o gameplay fez o jogo ficar graficamente mais bonito. Para ficar perfeito só faltaram as músicas eurobeat.
Lol the Cutscene music in the Playstation 1 version is Reggae.
I love both Consoles uniquely. Either one gives me huge nostalgia & vibes when playin'.
Probably a reference to that one famous Master Mix Amigo drift video where the guy is blasting Shabba Ranks and Supercat
Pusa laro
Sega only needed another year to improve, but by then Sony had so much backing there was no way to stop it. I feel like they just spat out this game during Saturn's launch.
Sega didn't need another year, they needed loyal management staff at Sega of America because Tom Kalinske betrayed Sega by forcing his 32X... that 32X is what drained resources away from the Sega Saturn.
After that and Kalinske further sabotage of the Sega Saturn during 1995 snd early 1996 you end up with Bernie Stolar who never should have been hired by Sega Japan especially when he was fired from Sony.
Stolar intentionally rejected and ignored a massive amount of Japanese Sega Saturn exclusives and refused to approve them for Western release by making up a bunch of b.s. reasons which was similar to what Kalinske was doing but worse.
With a different management staff at Sega of America, no 32X and support for the 1MB and 4MB ram Cartridge games in the Western world, we'd have a longer term difference... and no Dreamcast so no bankruptcy from premature hardware jump
DC gc ps2 Xbox
PlayStation's hardware was always light years ahead of Saturn for 3D games and by the point this game released there were a bunch of coders really adept at making it sing. It's actually a really good looking game on PlayStation and makes the Saturn version look from a previous generation
that's not true at all but this game is not the best exemple ..... there more than 6 month between both release by the way.
It's very true. On paper Saturn had better hardware but in practice Sony's machine was far better set up for 3D games and far more accessible. Power is nothing without control as a famous ad once put it, and there aren't many better examples than the story of Saturn v PlayStation.
Many games prooves the exact opposite. A lot, most first party games are graphically equivalent of their PS counterpart. multiplateform games are not the best exemple to compare the 3D graphics powers of both systems. Like you said PS is more accessible for a developer and no one spend more money and times for a less successfull system. But games like Virtua Fighter 2 or Nights for exemple can't be on PS with the same resolution or backgrounds colors. Games like exhumed, Duke Nukem3D, Street Racer or Grandia have better Saturn versions. If you know the saturn library as well a i know it you will see that the facts are here.
I preempted your reply already. You aren't saying anything new. I acknowledged that Saturn's _theoretical_ performance is better than PlayStation's. The fact remains only a tiny handful of games, usually Sega ones with the budget and insider advantage got anywhere close to proving the potential of the hardware. By 1998 most other developers had completely given up on Saturn while high profile PS1 games kept coming all the way into 2000 and beyond. Raw power *ISN'T THE ONLY FACTOR* when talking about comparing system performance and never has been. The coding environment and software tools are a massive factor. PlayStation's best results on lots of retail games comfortably match the best released teeny number of games on Saturn despite the hardware differences. PlayStation was always far better for the vast majority of developers in creating fully realised 3D rendered games, and the machine itself was far less expensive to work with and indeed to manufacture. Sony nailed it from the hardware to the software. Sega screwed up both. In this sense it was light years ahead of Saturn and it was the console that revolutionised the gaming industry, while Saturn died a quick death.
i didn't speack about theoretical, i don't care about system's architectures. i speack about games and there's lot of games during all the Saturn lifespan who are largely same graphically than PS. You are right, the Playstation change the gaming industry, infortunatly, not in the better way ....
No Saturn parece um jogo de 32X mal portado. A única explicação é que foram feitos por softhouses diferentes.
They both look similar, only on PS1 they gave more care to the dynamic lighting.
when do you make some video about exclusive VS ? like last Bronx VS soul calibur, Daytona Usa VS Ridge Racer, Wing Arms VS air combat etc .
The Saturn one looks like a Sega CD game
I was thinking 32X :P
64x my sega
PlayStation wins !perfect !!
The cutscenes are both nightmare fuel. The lighting and models look better on PlayStation but they're somewhat blurry. The Saturn version is very crisp though.
Genki a que fez Virtua Fighter 3 TB pra Dreamcast?
Nice video! Funny...they are completely different. Now I need the saturn version :(
Looks like two different games on two different generations of hardware. There is no denying the ps1 architecture was a 3d beast. I prefer the saturn, but ps1 3d for the most part was as if its hardware was a good couple years ahead of the saturn. There's no doubt this was the major factor that lead to the saturns demise.
Fueron desarrollados por distintas compañías. De ahi la GRAN diferencia.
Everyone's talking about the graphics, but can we all notice that the drifting on the PS1 is way more satisfying?
It kinda looks like the anime lol
3d film
I actually like both
initial d street stage on psp is bloody excellent
Dessa vez não tem desculpa. A versão do Saturn é uma PIADA perto da do PlayStation.
the characters animation at Saturn has funny
Claramente superior no ps1. Efeitos de iluminação dos farois na pista muito mais fiel ao original. O degradê pra tentar simular o mesmo efeito, ficou feio no Saturn. O PS1 tb ganha na modelagem do carro, os polígonos quebram menos que no Saturn.
I'd say PS1 wins in terms of detail. You can see the headlights on the car etc. Also it just looks realistic overall. PS1, steady framerate. The PS1 does cover up the pop in better too though the view angle seems to be poor on the PS1,. I do like the view of the Saturn better, it helps to see what's ahead while driving.
As a big Saturn Fan i must say the the Playstation Version wins clearly here !
[Junião] Bom dia! Seria possível obter seu e-mail para contato? Gostaria de te mandar algo de forma privada. Grato! Junião.
Knowing Akina Very Well. I can say that the Sega Saturn is very Accurate while the PS1 game just slams in a load of recognisable places from the anime.
playstation 1999 a year for upgrad
sega saturn 1998 standard
*6 months
*8 months
The Saturn can't do lighting very well.
That's not true, it can, developers just didn't spend time getting it done...but if you look up hellslave saturn, you will see what kind of lighting the console is actually capable of.
Under DC
They look like 2 completely different games!
It's obvious that PS1 is better by far, no one can deny that fact BUT there's something that really pisses me off and that's the Saturn could render that game so much better than it was made. Sonic R is the ultimate example to support this statement. What a shame, Saturn was an incredible power house but Sega screwed up big time.
Esse do PSX com uma resolução maior, já se passaria por jogo de Dreamcast... achei muito bonito! Vou até tentar uma jogada qualquer dia desses...
Leo Oliveira em alguns poucos jogos 3D eu acho que o Saturno está melhor, é o caso do Grandia por exemplo.
Como eu já tinha comentado anteriormente, no PSX os gráficos evoluíram muito, já no Saturn os jogos de 98 têm praticamente o mesmo visual da 1a safra.
A diferença é gritante a favor do PlayStation.
I've never been a fanboy and I think both consoles produced some amazing games in the hands of good developers, and both consoles produced good enough looking graphics when effort was put in. These both look like a fun time.
it looks like sega rosso took more inspiration for arcade stage from the saturn version than from the ps1 version despite it being the worse of the two, which works for me cause arcade stage is fire
Cool 😎 initial D ! We need for PlayStation 4 and 5!
Salve UA-camr,passando por aqui para apoiar seu trabalho e deixar meu forte apoio e claro meu like,eu aqui acabei te achando e vendo seus vídeos,tb tenho um canal que é de games e sempre estou postando algo kkkk,se der passa por lá e ativa o sininho se gostar blz e gracias
Even though ps1 looks more realistic, it seems darker and harder to see. That was one thing I disliked about ridge racer type 4, too dark. So judging by this video id rather try it for saturn.
It's not really the same game. Still, the PlayStation is lightyears ahead on the technical side.
I wish if the ps1 version would be released for the ps2 in 2000
Imo this game looks way better on PlayStation than on Saturn
It looks and it runs way better on the PlayStation over the Sega Saturn cars are actually drifting on PlayStation
O jogo de Saturn parece quase um tech demo comparado ao jogo de PS1. Falta acabamento em tudo. Parece que criaram uma engine que rodava em um framerate decente e acharam que já estava bom e decidiram lançar o jogo de qualquer maneira. Uma pena. A única parte boa da versão de Saturn é que o controle é bem melhor. Pra jogar por mais tempo, a versão de Saturn vale mais a pena, mas o visual é muito piorado. Ainda fizeram o jogo na resolução mais baixa... Drift King, por exemplo, é MUITO melhor do que isso aí.
Well, no brainer here, PS1 all the way. Neither seem as fast as the Arcade i tried (i believe it was the 2002 ver) but even the ps1 version looks more modern than the arcade was, do to the 3D.
Was about to try the Saturn version, but nope. The car doesnt even drift, dont get the point of that. And graphically as others say, they look a generation apart.
Tachibana itsuki car AE85 corolla levin is red colours in sega saturn version
both game are completely different
Love Saturn, but clearly PSX is the winner in terms of graphics.
PS1 has better lighting, colors, and resolution. I don't see any visual advantages on the Sega Saturn. Saturn version does have a more cartoony look which goes with the cartoony cutscenes.
Jeez those PS1 cutscenes are appalling! What's worse is that they couldn't even license any of the Eurobeat music
eu acho que o Impact Racing do Saturn vs Playstation parece pau a pau as duas versões se eu estiver certo.
I Love those 2 games. but I have to say the PSone is better. the Special Stage version that's on PlayStation 2 & PlayStation 3, those has to be my A-1 Favorites.
Sonic The Hedgehog PSP street stage I almost match my Stage 3 arcade times. It's almost perfect you should check it out on ppsspp. Ps3 was too floaty for me with stage 4 physics
For sure, man. I played it before on ppsspp. It was still incredible on the PSP version. I have to agree on the stage 4 physics. If only it was like "Gran Turismo" or "Sega GT" Simulated type of physics.
Saturn character cutscenes look better
3d initial d us just awkward
Something isn't quite right... I could buy a clue, but even a single euro beats a hundred yen...
Initial D on PlayStation has unskipable dialog for days
Nossa!! este anime conseguiu tocar nesta geração dos 32 bits! nem sonhava que tinha este game. gostei da versão SS.
This PSX is clearly the winner.
Again I like the coloring more of the Saturn, but that short draw-distance is horrible.
PSX>Saturn.
Parece mais que estavam fazendo uma versão para o 32x e só portaram para o Saturn.😂😂😂
Why does itsuki have shingos car?
The saturn lightning engine is horrid. The only thing better on saturn are the cut scenes and black level.
Diferença absurda a favor do psx, mesmo entendendo que o saturn seria inferior ao que tange processamento 3d, ainda assim creio que houve uma deficiência na portabilidade para o saturn, talvez levando em conta o hardware complexo do mesmo.
a diferença é de uma geração. Alias, os consoles da Sega sempre tiveram disso ou eles faziam jogos espetaculares e competitivos, ou eles conseguiam fazer um jogo praticamente intragável isso vem desde da época do Master, Genesis Sega Saturn e talvez só foi corrigido no Dreamcast. Massacre do PS1.
You can't drift in the saturn version
Yes... you can.
No you did
Difficult to choose! Saturn best cinematic psone best graphism!! 😅
Some of the characters in this anime look like Pepé the Frog. The guy can draw cars well, but faces...not so much...
Man, everything about the PS1 version took forever to get going. Intro FMV, FMV cutscene at school, FMV cutscene before the race. I just wanna drive!
Can't you just skip the scenes?
Movie bagyong
i like 2d artstyle from saturn. but ps gameplay look better.
they are 2 diferent games
I love the ps1 initial d
Draw Distance do Saturn é menor , tem umas ociladas nos fps Tb , mas eu prefiro as intro do Saturn
PlayStation wins, but would not want to play either game.
Feel sorry for saturn version
O jogo é mais bonito no Playstation, mas acho que o Saturn faz um trabalho decente sim. O jogo é bonito no Saturn, graficamente no quesito corrido talvez só perde pro Sega Rally.
psx looks like your not going that fast
PS1 with its 8 bit goraud shading and dithering looks specially better on darker environments like these.
Saturn is supposed to be dark but it isn't dark, just the skybox is black. Switch that for a white one and it makes no difference.
Ps1 better on atmosphere and graphics
On sega better HUD
Wait. . . THIS IS ACTUALLY A GAME SERIES?
Quando um jogo é inferior no playstation,é porque o playstation é ruim.
Quando um jogo é inferior no saturn,é culpa da produtora que não soube programar.
Seguistas odeiam o playstation.
PlayStations version look way way more polished (I never played either)... but those loading times on the Saturn was the nail in the coffin ;)
Actually, it doesn't.
Don't know
I'm a Saturn fanboy, but PS1 easily wins this one.
The artworks in the Saturn version look like they have been drawn by five year olds... 7:56 that facial expression of the driver xD
Thats how propably most Saturn owners looked at the game if they saw the Playstation version first :D :D :D
Playstation version, even with trembling polygons and warping textures xD... Althoug Saturn offers a hard fight! mega power... haha, regards.
Even being different devs is not acceptable for how poor the Saturn version is. Draw distance is atrocious.
Ps1 mais muito wins.....se nao me engano a do saturno sai primeiro....