People don't realize that the Tu160 was a response and equivalent to (if not a cruder half copy of) the B-1A, which the USAF CANCELLED in the late 1970s under President Carter. Both could carry lots of bombs (though the B1 could carry more internally), have swing wings, and fly at more than Mach 2 as a high-speed, high altitude bomber (the Tupelov is considerably bigger, because the Soviets built everything big and didn't have as much miniaturization technology). By contrast, the B-1B though it looks similar to both is actually a very different bomber under the skin. It could still carry all the bombs (way more than B2 or even B52), but had stealth features though it's not a flying wing design--its RCS (radar cross section) is about the same as a much smaller 4th generation fighter, and probably 1/10 or less than that of the Tu160. It can only fly at half the top speed at a little above Mach 1 because it's designed for low-level penetration. It won't be impossible to shoot down a Tu160--the Ukrainians will need to have good intel and know when they take off and where, and then forward deploy some fighters or long range air defense missile close enough to take it down in an ambush. Detecting the Tu160 won't be a problem--it's having long enough of a spear to spear it that is the challenge. Catching 1 or more on the ground is a more likely possibility, and the Ukrainians are exceedingly good at doing that using drones and other hard-to-defend long-range weapons--I think that's already rumored to have happened, no? They already caught at least one Su57 and more than a few Russian AWACs (A50), which are just as valuable as the 160 (the 57 more for symbolic value, the 50 because Russia has so few of them).
很難，Tu-160 都是在俄羅斯境內發射射程2千公里巡弋飛彈，要用F-16發射AIM-120擊落Tu-160就要飛進防空飛彈林立的俄羅斯領域內，畢竟連速度慢的Tu-95也還沒有被烏克蘭空軍戰機擊落過。除非用F-35之類的匿蹤戰機深入俄羅斯領空內擊落Tu-160。用游擊隊攜帶小型自殺無人機在俄羅斯境內發射襲擊俄羅斯空軍基地或用長程無機毀傷Tu-160是目前比較可行的，而且無人機也確實擊毀過10多架Tu-95和幾架Tu-160過。
擊落160，最小的成本是在地面上，空中擊落要用價格昂貴的導彈。
烏克蘭基本在戰場上已經完全輾壓俄羅斯了，就等庫斯克的烏軍高歌猛進，包圍克林姆林宮逮捕普丁，結束戰爭了。
有道理
@@damon1938目前明明是俄羅斯站些微優勢（雖然優勢不大），烏軍則陷入被動
预警机指挥携带AIM120的F16或者携带流星的幻影2000
支持
源頭打擊再會飛飛再高總要起降及終休回航
F16對地比A10更勁！對付Tu160絕對無問題！
務必使用絕對使用絕對武力，收復克里米亞，澤倫斯基真的帥氣報表。
澤倫斯基已說不會用武力收復克里米亞，這樣他還帥嗎?
@@孫悟空-r7w 當然帥
怎樣都帥
@@hsuwei-yen472 不用武力拿回克里米亞就拿不回來這樣也帥? 那就等於割土
@@hsuwei-yen472 那為了拿克里米亞死那麼多人，現在才說不用武力拿，這樣也帥，你標準還真好笑
@@hsuwei-yen472
自由時報引用福斯新聞:
擔心川普上任中斷援助 澤倫斯基警告：烏克蘭將輸掉戰爭
2024/11/21 18:18
〔編譯管淑平／綜合報導〕
{
澤倫斯基說，.....我們無法為了克里米亞回歸，而犧牲我們成千上萬條人命，我們了解克島能夠透過外交拿回來」。
}
说的好像已经击落tu160一样
把隱身突防講的好像很神
那為什麼美軍還要保留B52和B1呢？
People don't realize that the Tu160 was a response and equivalent to (if not a cruder half copy of) the B-1A, which the USAF CANCELLED in the late 1970s under President Carter. Both could carry lots of bombs (though the B1 could carry more internally), have swing wings, and fly at more than Mach 2 as a high-speed, high altitude bomber (the Tupelov is considerably bigger, because the Soviets built everything big and didn't have as much miniaturization technology). By contrast, the B-1B though it looks similar to both is actually a very different bomber under the skin. It could still carry all the bombs (way more than B2 or even B52), but had stealth features though it's not a flying wing design--its RCS (radar cross section) is about the same as a much smaller 4th generation fighter, and probably 1/10 or less than that of the Tu160. It can only fly at half the top speed at a little above Mach 1 because it's designed for low-level penetration.
It won't be impossible to shoot down a Tu160--the Ukrainians will need to have good intel and know when they take off and where, and then forward deploy some fighters or long range air defense missile close enough to take it down in an ambush. Detecting the Tu160 won't be a problem--it's having long enough of a spear to spear it that is the challenge. Catching 1 or more on the ground is a more likely possibility, and the Ukrainians are exceedingly good at doing that using drones and other hard-to-defend long-range weapons--I think that's already rumored to have happened, no? They already caught at least one Su57 and more than a few Russian AWACs (A50), which are just as valuable as the 160 (the 57 more for symbolic value, the 50 because Russia has so few of them).
英國軍隊前面退役武器沒多久這些英國退役武器裝備出現在烏克蘭軍隊的裝備序列中！逼著俄軍消耗龐大軍事力量和彈藥摧毀這些烏克蘭的英製武器！
圖160最高速度是2馬赫，f-16最高速度也是2馬赫，要攔截擊落問題不大
速度不是最关键的，3马赫的飞机都能拦截。看是正面发射还是后方发射，正上方发射最理想，aim120A最快的速度段可以到达4马赫。而且不同战机的最高速度海拔不一样，1000米海拔开2马赫F16会解体的。
如果有電戰戰鬥機是可以配合圖160轟炸機進行作戰任務！
Tu~160飛2.3馬赫或更快,打得中只有Tu~95應該出勤更高,睇嚟都係慳啲玩啦😂🎉❤！
只要解禁武器的使用和加大援烏就能擊落，或進入烏領土也能擊落！這個話題沒太大意義
低軌衛星以後不知道會不會掛導彈.或激光發射
衛星打地面目標啊
不管用上帝之杖還是衛星雷射砲
首先你要考慮一個問題
衛星本體要怎麼移動到目標攻擊點
衛星又不是說動就可以馬上到目標軌道上
說不定到目標處時候
早就不曉得過幾個禮拜了
再說你能讓衛星到達目標軌道上了
那上帝之杖的砲彈跟雷射砲能量從哪裡來
根據能量守恆定律
你要成功攻擊目標的能量之前就得要準備同等量的能量來用
以上幾個問題沒解決
基本上衛星攻擊就是一個概念戰略武器
當然以前美國的確有計畫衛星當砲台來直接全方位無死角攻擊
不過估計所需成本高到美國直接說不搞
低轨卫星才多大？
普京:如果烏軍擊落圖160 將不排除動用核武!
Thank you 火力君 一口氣看到尾 看完再看 🏆 🏆 🏆 🏆 🏆 ☘ 😄 🌺 🀄 😃 💐 ☕ 🌸 😁 🏵 😀 🧧 🎉 😇 🌺 😎 🎊 🏮 🍀
笑死
AIM-120打圖160？
你是當戰機零時逼近三十公里內發射嗎？
這款飛彈射程只有一百二十公里
圖160一旦開跑
飛彈追到一半就掉下來了
而且誰說圖160沒有防禦手段？？？？
假如？假如俄羅斯使用氫彈攻擊基輔怎麼辦？
基輔人民死傷悽慘
但
普京會被烏軍全力追殺
普京還想當萬年皇帝
會想找死嗎？
對說的是打他們的戰機.
可以派敵後特工加以破壞!
情報和速度
全程2馬赫？還得多了解了解飛機。
覺對不能給邪惡國家AI 會很難對付
克里米亚是黑海最重要的要塞，因此成为乌克兰近年苦难的根源，俄罗斯侵占克里米亚，乌克兰肉疼，就遭灭顶之灾。
同样的灾难，百年前发生在中国。蒙古作为欧亚大陆最重要的地缘战略高地，苏联势在必得，中国不愿意痛失生死存亡之地，因此惨遭颠覆分裂直到灭亡。1920年苏联出兵蒙古，同年派遣特务维京斯基和马林到中国制造地下恐怖组织，1924年制造蒙古人民共和国，1931年制造苏维埃中华共和国，1944年制造东突厥斯坦人民共和国，1948年制造朝鲜人民共和国，1949年制造中华人民共和国，1974年制造越南人民共和。
乌克兰和中国一样悲剧，盖因匹夫无罪，怀碧其罪。
冬季已经来临，春天还会远吗？
🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
👍
驾驶舱内部看起来好落后啊
澤倫斯基超帥的 別人的孩子死不完
八月時北約女空官駕F16擊落一架Su35，若烏克蘭掛載AIM-120要幹掉俄所有轟炸機非常輕易絕無問題
北约女拿帝国歼星舰都打下来了，tu160随便打
假如烏納戰敗 昂薩分裂 島內回歸 雙標君剩啥能吹？🤣
如何擊落圖160是烏克蘭可以做到的？.....................就這樣毫無顧忌的踐踏自己的專業完全沒有下限誒
戰況不利沒東西講。開始做白日夢了😂
F16不可以嗎？
全程1.5倍音速?能超巡?超音速10分钟都开不了！装弹可能都不能超音速!