Understanding Heteroskedasticity

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 сер 2024
  • This video explains how to understand heteroscedasticity. Coined from the Greek word hetero (which means different or unequal), and skedastic (which means spread or scatter). So, homoskedasticity means equal spread, and heteroskedasticity, on the other hand, means unequal spread. The measure of spread is the variance, hence, heteroskedasticity deals with unequal variances. Heteroskedasticity or heteroscedasticity is the same. Only be consistent. Yes! The longest word in the econometrics dictionary with 18 words. One of the assumptions of ordinary least squares (OLS) is that the model must be homoskedastic. Needed to justify the usual t tests, F tests, and confidence intervals for OLS estimation of the linear regression model, even in large samples. In general, heteroskedasticity is more likely to occur in cross-sectional analysis. This does not imply that heteroskedasticity in time series models is impossible. What are the causes of heteroskedasticity? (1) Poor data sampling method may lead to heteroskedasticity particularly when collecting primary data. (2) Wrong data transformation. For instance, over-differencing a variable may lead to heteroskedasticity. (3) Wrong model specification. Related to the functional form: log-log, log-level, and level-level models. (4) The presence of outliers can lead to your model becoming heteroskedastic. Bogus figures that stands out. Very obvious to the prying eyes. (5) Skewness of one or more regressors (closely related to outliers being evident in the data). Consequences of heteroskedasticity: (1) OLS estimators, β ̂_OLS are still linear, unbiased and consistent. Hence the regression estimates remain unbiased and consistent. (2) But the estimators, β ̂_OLS are inefficient (that is, not having minimum variance) in the class of minimum variance estimators. (3) Therefore, OLS is no longer BLUE (Best Linear Unbiased Estimator). (4) Such that regression predictors (estimates) are also inefficient, though consistent. (5) Implies that the regression estimates cannot be used to construct confidence intervals, or used for inferences. (6) Affects the variances (and standard errors) of the estimated β ̂_S. (7) OLS method under-estimates the variances (and standard errors). (8) Yields low standard errors (9) Leads to higher than expected values of t and F statistics. (10) Yields statistically significant coefficients. (11) Rejection of the null hypothesis too often (12) Causes Type I error. (13) Both the t and the F statistics are no longer reliable any more for hypothesis testing. Some heteroskedasticity tests are: Breusch-Pagan LM Test; Glesjer LM Test; Harvey-Godfrey LM Test; Park LM Test; Goldfeld-Quandt Test; White’s Test; Engle’s ARCH Test; and Koenker-Basset Test. Heteroskedasticity can be resolved by: (1) Functional Forms; (2) Generalised (Weighted) Least Squares (GLS/WLS); and (3) White’s Robust-Standard Errors. How to detect heteroskedasticity? The truth is that there is no hard and fast rule for detecting heteroskedasticity. Therefore, more often than not, heteroskedasticity may be a case of educated guesswork, prior empirical experiences or mere speculation. However, informal and formal approaches can be used in detecting the presence of heteroskedasticity such as: Informal approach: Plotting the residuals from the regression against the estimated dependent variable
    Formal approach: Perform econometric tests. There are several tests of heteroskedasticity, each based on certain assumptions. The interested reader may want to consult the references listed at the end of the video.
    Link to A&H_hprice.xlsx data (free) and dofile (Subject to payment) cruncheconometrix.com.ng/shop/
    Note: You have to CART and CHECKOUT.
    References and Readings: Asteriou and Hall (2016) Applied Econometrics, 3ed; Wooldridge, J. M. (1995). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. London, England: The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Baltagi, B.H. (1995) Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; Hsiao, C. (1986) Analysis of Panel Data, Econometric Society Monographs No. 11. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; Gujarati and Porter (2009) Basic Econometrics, International Edition; John, F. (1997) Applied Regression Analysis, Linear Models, and Related Methods, Sage Publications, California, p. 306; Mankiw, GN. (1990) “A Quick Refresher Course in Macroeconomics,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXVIII, p. 1648
    Follow up with soft-notes and updates from CrunchEconometrix:
    Playlists: / cruncheconometrix
    Website: cruncheconometrix.com.ng
    Blog: cruncheconometrix.blogspot.co...
    Facebook: / cruncheconometrix
    UA-cam Custom URL: / cruncheconometrix
    Twitter: / crunchmetrix
    Reddit: / crunchmetrix

КОМЕНТАРІ • 48

  • @CrunchEconometrix
    @CrunchEconometrix  4 роки тому +7

    I want to appreciate all my subscribers from across the globe (Africa, Asia, Europe, the Middle East, The Americas, and The Pacific). Thank you all for your support. I am encouraged by your comments, questions, likes and critiques. They keep me focussed and poised to do better. I will continue to contribute my little quota such that every student and researcher will independently analyse his/her data. My teaching approach is very practical. I adopt a do-as-I-do style. Many thanks to those who have supported me by telling others. Once again, CrunchEconometrix loves to teach, support my Channel with your subscription, likes, feedbacks and sharing my videos with your cohorts. Please do not keep me to yourself (lol) inform your friends, students and academic networks about my Channel. Tell them CrunchEconometrix breaks down the econometric jargons and teaches with simplicity. Follow me on Facebook, Twitter and Reddit. Love you all, greatly!!! 

    • @donasp5391
      @donasp5391 3 роки тому

      Your videos are a great resource! Thank you so much for your effort!

  • @nchimbar
    @nchimbar 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you Prof. You're making Econometrics simple.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 роки тому

      I'm humbled and encouraged by your comment, Chimbar. Thank you. Please may I know from where (location) you are reaching me?

  • @iamgroot3834
    @iamgroot3834 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you enormously! Your videos are so clear and easy to understand!

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 роки тому +1

      U're welcome, Iamgroot 😊. Please be a progress partner and share with your students and the academia. May God bless you as you do, amen 🙏

  • @mmworks.6767
    @mmworks.6767 4 роки тому +1

    Prof. you are simply amazing. I have watch your videos one after the other like I promised, they're all classic. Thank you for demystifying econometrics. From Nigeria

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 роки тому +1

      Thanks for the encouraging feedback, Elijah. I am grateful!🙏

  • @Dr_Shiny
    @Dr_Shiny 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you Ma'am Professor ....

  • @nswid5465
    @nswid5465 4 роки тому +1

    Thank You very much for this set of videos, God bless you.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 роки тому +1

      You are welcome, Ife. Thanks! Please may I know from where (location) you are reaching me?

  • @dilaraesmer
    @dilaraesmer 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much for your labor, you clearly explained it. :)
    Best wishes for you 💐

  • @ashisdeb1140
    @ashisdeb1140 3 роки тому +1

    I am really impressed by the detailed explanation.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  3 роки тому

      Thanks for the positive feedback, Ashis...deeply appreciated!

  • @brunoanthoine860
    @brunoanthoine860 3 роки тому

    Excellent video, very thorough, clear and straight to the point. Thank you very much!

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  3 роки тому

      Thanks for the encouraging feedback, Bruno. Deeply appreciated! 🙏 ❤️

  • @magnificent9872
    @magnificent9872 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much you have been making my journey in econometrics easier. I know you meant 18 letters and not 18 words. Good job prof.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  2 роки тому +1

      Hahahaha thanks, Esther. Yeah meant letters. Funny I didn't realize I said that until you pointed it out 🙏😊

  • @grtion
    @grtion Рік тому +1

    Nice explanation🙏

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  Рік тому

      Thanks, Puju for your encouraging feedback. Deeply appreciated 🙏🥰

  • @warugongo11
    @warugongo11 4 роки тому +1

    This is excellent

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 роки тому

      Hi Ngugi, thanks for the positive feedback. Grateful! Kindly assist me in sharing this, thanks!❤️🙏

  • @nawrajbhatta2733
    @nawrajbhatta2733 4 роки тому

    thank you CrunchEconometrics for video. please upload the video about autocorrelation also. im waiting for that too.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 роки тому

      U're welcome, Naw. I'll do my best to upload your suggestion once I have all information. Thanks a lot!

  • @MuhammadAhmad-ei1ib
    @MuhammadAhmad-ei1ib 4 роки тому +1

    Respect from Pakistan. Thanks ma'am.

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 роки тому

      Nice to hear from you, Muhd...compliments of the season. Thanks for the support you gave me and for sharing my videos. I wish you the best of year 2020!

    • @MuhammadAhmad-ei1ib
      @MuhammadAhmad-ei1ib 4 роки тому +1

      @@CrunchEconometrix Well thanks ma'am

    • @hoygaiftiinka5826
      @hoygaiftiinka5826 3 роки тому

      @@CrunchEconometrix 1

  • @claretergu9801
    @claretergu9801 5 місяців тому +1

    Hello, please How do I perform the Breush Pagan LM cross sectional dependency in STATA? Thank you

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  5 місяців тому

      I don't have a specific video on this. So, you can resort to Stata HELP Menu for detailed guidance.

    • @claretergu9801
      @claretergu9801 5 місяців тому +1

      @@CrunchEconometrix alright thank you

  • @asanteka.2403
    @asanteka.2403 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks Prof

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 роки тому +1

      My pleasure. Wish you the best of year 2020 in Jesus' name, amen!

    • @asanteka.2403
      @asanteka.2403 4 роки тому +1

      @@CrunchEconometrix thanks very much and same to you my dear.

    • @asanteka.2403
      @asanteka.2403 4 роки тому

      @@CrunchEconometrix Hey prof , i've Just encountered an intricacy and would like to here what you think about It.
      I estimated a Linear model where human capital had no role in promoting growth. But when interacted with another macroeconomic variable, the interaction variable is positive and significant. However, human capital becomes negative. So my worry is, Is It normal for human capital to have a negative and significant impact on growth in the presence of the interaction variable? What Can be a plausible interpretation ?

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 роки тому

      @@asanteka.2403 Such findings are common with studies on SSA countries due to the poor development of the labour force becomes a drag on growth.

    • @asanteka.2403
      @asanteka.2403 4 роки тому +1

      @@CrunchEconometrix thanks very much prof, you are Just wonderful
      Best wishes for this year and we'll be waiting for many more Lectures for thé upcoming 2020.

  • @vinayakk5786
    @vinayakk5786 3 місяці тому

    Thomachan padipichapo Ellam korch confusion ayrnu chechi.. ipo ath manasilayi 😮

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  3 місяці тому

      Can you please give the English interpretation of your comment? Thanks.

  • @fadijasmin1
    @fadijasmin1 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you for this appreciated explanation. . But I have a question related to the inefficient estimate caused by such problem. In fact an inefficient estimate, as you say, means that this estimate does not have the minimum variance, so that it has a big variance and hence a big standard error?? Consequently a smaller t or F statistic than it should be??
    So here an error of type II

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 роки тому +2

      Hi Matar, thanks for the feedback but you are mixing things up. Heteroskedasticity implies that the variance is not constant which can be increasing or decreasing. Het UNDERESTIMATES the SE which is the sqrt of the variance. I will encourage you to consult further references indicated at the end of the video. Please may I know from where (location) you are reaching me? Thanks.

    • @fadijasmin1
      @fadijasmin1 4 роки тому +1

      Thank you sincerely for your reply
      I will do a quick revision of the cited references to clarify this idea
      I reach you from Syria and always wish you the best a+

    • @CrunchEconometrix
      @CrunchEconometrix  4 роки тому

      @@fadijasmin1 No worries 😊. I'll appreciate it if you can share the link to my UA-cam Channel with your friends and academic community in Syria 🇸🇾. They will find the content helpful too 😊.

  • @EstherOgundare
    @EstherOgundare 3 місяці тому +1

    Up up crunch encomentrice globally receive more strength and favour and grace from the Almighty God and man IJMN. More subscriber's Globally IJMN.This is evidence of hard studying and dedication to impact your generation. Weldon ooooooo Dr Ngozi Adeleye. Greatest God will bless the works of your hands IJMN.Mum.