American Rifles & Shotguns of World War 1 I THE GREAT WAR Special feat. C&Rsenal

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 вер 2018
  • Othais from C&Rsenal tells Indy all about American rifles and shotguns from World War 1.
    » HOW CAN I SUPPORT YOUR CHANNEL?
    You can support us by sharing our videos with your friends and spreading the word about our work.You can also support us financially on Patreon: / thegreatwar
    You can also buy our merchandise in our online shop: shop.spreadshirt.de/thegreatwar/
    Patreon is a platform for creators like us, that enables us to get monthly financial support from the community in exchange for cool perks.
    » WHERE CAN I GET MORE INFORMATION ABOUT WORLD WAR I AND WHERE ELSE CAN I FIND YOU?
    We’re offering background knowledge, news, a glimpse behind the scenes and much more on:
    reddit: bit.ly/TheGreatSubReddit
    Facebook: bit.ly/WW1FB
    Twitter: bit.ly/WW1Series
    Instagram: bit.ly/ZpMYPL
    » CAN I EMBED YOUR VIDEOS ON MY WEBSITE?
    Of course, you can embed our videos on your website. We are happy if you show our channel to your friends, fellow students, classmates, professors, teachers or neighbours. Or just share our videos on Facebook, Twitter, Reddit etc.
    We are also happy to get your feedback, criticism or ideas in the comments. If you have interesting historical questions, just post them and we will answer in our OUT OF THE TRENCHES videos. You can find a selection of answers to the most frequently asked questions here: bit.ly/OOtrenches
    » CAN I SHOW YOUR VIDEOS IN CLASS?
    Of course! Tell your teachers or professors about our channel and our videos. We’re happy if we can contribute with our videos. If you are a teacher and have questions about our show, you can get in contact with us on one of our social media presences.
    » WHAT ARE YOUR SOURCES?
    Videos: British Pathé
    Pictures: Mostly Picture Alliance
    Background Map: d-maps.com/carte.php?num_car=6...
    Literature (excerpt):
    Gilbert, Martin. The First World War. A Complete History, Holt Paperbacks, 2004.
    Hart, Peter. The Great War. A Combat History of the First World War, Oxford University Press, 2013.
    Hart, Peter. The Great War. 1914-1918, Profile Books, 2013.
    Stone, Norman. World War One. A Short History, Penguin, 2008.
    Keegan, John. The First World War, Vintage, 2000.
    Hastings, Max. Catastrophe 1914. Europe Goes To War, Knopf, 2013.
    Hirschfeld, Gerhard. Enzyklopädie Erster Weltkrieg, Schöningh Paderborn, 2004
    Michalka, Wolfgang. Der Erste Weltkrieg. Wirkung, Wahrnehmung, Analyse, Seehamer Verlag GmbH, 2000
    Leonhard, Jörn. Die Büchse der Pandora: Geschichte des Ersten Weltkrieges, C.H. Beck, 2014
    If you want to buy some of the books we use or recommend during our show, check out our Amazon Store: bit.ly/AmazonTGW
    NOTE: This store uses affiliate links which grant us a commission if you buy a product there.
    » WHAT IS “THE GREAT WAR” PROJECT?
    THE GREAT WAR covers the events exactly 100 years ago: The story of World War I in realtime. Featuring: The unique archive material of British Pathé. Indy Neidell takes you on a journey into the past to show you what really happened and how it all could spiral into more than four years of dire war. Subscribe to our channel and don’t miss our new episodes every Thursday.
    » WHO IS REPLYING TO MY COMMENTS? AND WHO IS BEHIND THIS PROJECT?
    Most of the comments are written by our social media manager Florian. He is posting links, facts and backstage material on our social media channels. But from time to time, Indy reads and answers comments with his personal account, too.
    The Team responsible for THE GREAT WAR is even bigger:
    - CREDITS -
    Presented by : Indiana Neidell
    Written by: Indiana Neidell
    Director: Toni Steller & Florian Wittig
    Director of Photography: Toni Steller
    Sound: Toni Steller
    Mixing, Mastering & Sound Design: www.above-zero.com
    Editing: Toni Steller, Julian Zahn
    Motion Design: Christian Graef
    Research by: Indiana Neidell
    Fact checking: Markus Linke
    The Great War Theme composed by Karim Theilgaard: bit.ly/karimyt
    A Mediakraft Networks Original Channel
    Based on a concept by Spartacus Olsson
    Author: Indiana Neidell
    Visual Concept: David van Stephold
    Producer: Toni Steller & Florian Wittig
    Social Media Manager: Florian Wittig
    Contains licenced Material by British Pathé
    All rights reserved - © Mediakraft Networks GmbH, 2018

КОМЕНТАРІ • 480

  • @phprofYT
    @phprofYT 5 років тому +361

    "Hold on guys. I have to dry out my shotgun ammo before we attack."

    • @AlexDiaz-hl8qx
      @AlexDiaz-hl8qx 4 роки тому +16

      A Physics Professor and then the brass shell was born

    • @R281
      @R281 2 роки тому +2

      Just dry them in the fire.

    • @secretbaguette
      @secretbaguette 2 роки тому +3

      *BLOWDRIES SHOTGUN SHELLS WITH TRENCH RAIDING INTENT*

    • @KBell119
      @KBell119 Рік тому +1

      Paper hulls were were pretty much the standard up until plastic hulls first appeared in the 1960s.

    • @kingmichealthefirstofroman2278
      @kingmichealthefirstofroman2278 Рік тому +1

      *loads brass shotgun shells*

  • @scheewheed8285
    @scheewheed8285 5 років тому +508

    “Give us a semi-auto”
    “Here’s a bolt action”
    Lmao, reminds me of the time when I was told bring 2 pencils but I brought 1 ballpen

    • @MrPaul-bn9cl
      @MrPaul-bn9cl 5 років тому +20

      Look, everyone gets a bolt action, and everyone is gonna damn well like it!

    • @Crimethoughtfull
      @Crimethoughtfull 4 роки тому +3

      BAR meets an M14?? I'm so confused...

    • @DarnedYankee
      @DarnedYankee 4 роки тому +2

      @Sean
      Don't tell the marines that, they'll actually try it!

    • @charlesnichols3204
      @charlesnichols3204 3 роки тому +2

      @@MrPaul-bn9cl ppl llll

    • @kingmichealthefirstofroman2278
      @kingmichealthefirstofroman2278 2 роки тому

      You mean bring two bolt actions but you brought an auto loader

  • @Wladislav
    @Wladislav 5 років тому +172

    Interesting to hear that the shotguns were so unpopular in WWI.

    • @DarnedYankee
      @DarnedYankee 4 роки тому +25

      As the Europeans would say: "Completely uncivilized"

    • @loetzcollector466
      @loetzcollector466 3 роки тому +5

      @Evolved Dragon They have their time and place. The Great War was not it.

    • @Goatzies
      @Goatzies 3 роки тому +33

      It wasn’t the guns themselves, but the ammo: the shot shells were made out of paper, so in the wet trenches, yeah, not so effective.

    • @cdeezy2718
      @cdeezy2718 3 роки тому +2

      Who wants a shotgun when u got a KAR, and dual pistols

    • @Wladislav
      @Wladislav 3 роки тому +2

      @@cdeezy2718 and grenades, loads of grenades!

  • @roberthoyer3835
    @roberthoyer3835 4 роки тому +32

    I briefly owned a pattern 14 in Afghanistan. It was found by one of the teams and kept as a curiosity. The theory is that it was a surplus weapon given to the Afghan army by the British and found its way into a farmer/militant’s hands where it was captured. As it was still in working order, I wasn’t allowed to bring it home. As far as I know, it’s floating somewhere around Bagram airfield today...

    • @thekalamazookid4481
      @thekalamazookid4481 5 місяців тому

      That's a damn shame man, we couldn't even take knives home when I was there. I hate how soft the U.S is getting/ has gotten. Especially here in NY it seems like they want to ban everything. What happened to freedom of choice.

  • @snowwhite7677
    @snowwhite7677 5 років тому +168

    Note: The people who like the Krag were not forced to use it in a War.

    • @Life4Metalcore
      @Life4Metalcore 5 років тому +17

      Snow White i can’t imagine the fouling from hand loading in the trenches

    • @anthonyhayes1267
      @anthonyhayes1267 4 роки тому +4

      I like it simply from a sportsman's perspective

    • @semperfi1587
      @semperfi1587 4 роки тому +1

      What about the soldiers in the Spanish-American War?

    • @angrynoodle5572
      @angrynoodle5572 4 роки тому +4

      @@semperfi1587 I have heard stories of troops Ditching krags for Spanish rifles but I can't find sources

    • @CdogofNod1
      @CdogofNod1 3 роки тому

      @@angrynoodle5572 I heard that too, though I also heard that they didn't care for the mauser's recoil.

  • @sans8758
    @sans8758 4 роки тому +315

    Germans: “trench guns are illegal in warfare and are cruel weapons”
    America: shame

    • @planescaped
      @planescaped 4 роки тому +23

      To be fair, getting hit by 00 buck at long range is never going to kill someone, but it is going maim and cause undue harm and wounding.
      From that perspective I can understand the Germans saying they're cruel weapons. But I also agree with the US war department when they said the wounding is no different than shrapnel.

    • @GoTfan-eb8tk
      @GoTfan-eb8tk 4 роки тому +57

      @@planescaped In my opinion, the Germans had forfeited the moral high ground when they used poison gas.

    • @gunslinger1824
      @gunslinger1824 4 роки тому +3

      Brandon Korner well said

    • @adolfgaming1761
      @adolfgaming1761 4 роки тому +13

      Sans let me introduce my ... FLAMMENWERFER!

    • @thestaubful
      @thestaubful 4 роки тому +17

      @@adolfgaming1761 Flammenwerfer, a classic. It werfs the Flammen. :D

  • @hankw69
    @hankw69 5 років тому +122

    I had a 1917 Remington/Enfield, USMC. it was a beautiful, family heirloom with unit stamps. Several years ago it was stolen by meth-head trash along with my 1950's, pump action, 22 and never recovered. Probably sold for drug money. what a waste...

  • @juicynarwal6272
    @juicynarwal6272 5 років тому +175

    Speaking of those combat shotguns, those things were so popular here that it left a lasting impression on our military. Most of our security guards use either modernised versions or the exact same shotgun.
    EDIT: from the Philippines.

    • @HaggisNinja
      @HaggisNinja 5 років тому +2

      Juicy Narwal where is “here?”

    • @juicynarwal6272
      @juicynarwal6272 5 років тому +18

      General_Fratton ah sorry forgot to mention, the security business is very big here in the Philippines, and nearly every company uses those shotguns (either modernised or exact same model) with their guards or very rarely an AR gun.

    • @juicynarwal6272
      @juicynarwal6272 5 років тому +18

      jake jones no but my point is that us Filipinos liked it so much, that even decades after the Americans left, there is still widespread use despite the fact it comes from WWI.

    • @scheewheed8285
      @scheewheed8285 5 років тому +8

      Seems agreeable, I saw multiple guards with those shotguns guarding a man adding cash into an ATM

    • @fightingbear8537
      @fightingbear8537 5 років тому +1

      The shotgun was the gun that really won the west!

  • @stephengalindo6340
    @stephengalindo6340 5 років тому +64

    Inaccutate over 1400 yards. You cant hardly SEE that far in the first place!

    • @RobbyGAMEZ
      @RobbyGAMEZ 4 роки тому +10

      They were using vickers guns and other machine guns to fire a mile or more, sometimes pointing the barrels at extreme angles so the bullets rained down in an area to deny ground to the enemy. At the end of the day these were not meant to be used to kill individuals at that range. You've got to imagine a line of hundreds of guys with their sights set at a single range firing all at once at targets very far away. It's primarily going to keep German heads down while mortars and artillery find their range

  • @adolfgaming1761
    @adolfgaming1761 4 роки тому +178

    “So were goin’ into a muddy rainy terrain?”
    “Yes”
    “With paper cartridges?”
    “Yes?”
    “Cool thanks, can i sign my death certificate?”
    “Yes”

  • @charlesinglin
    @charlesinglin 5 років тому +50

    One of those curious facts: When the British lost much of their equipment at Dunkirk the US sent them M1917 Enfield from US war reserves, ultimately somewhere near 1 million. Because of the difference in caliber they were issued to the Home Guard, freeing up .303 rifles for more pressing needs, becoming the Home Guard's primary long arm. This also contributed to those famous photos of US recruits drilling with dummy rifles until new production replaced the war reserves.

    • @CrossOfBayonne
      @CrossOfBayonne 5 років тому +6

      We also supplied them with lots of Thompsons and 1911s too

    • @teufelhund4921
      @teufelhund4921 5 років тому +10

      They dumped those rifles into the Atlantic after the war. Thats gratitude for you...

    • @slamblamboozled1245
      @slamblamboozled1245 4 роки тому +5

      @@teufelhund4921 Well they were obsolete and unneeded.

    • @hasaki5474
      @hasaki5474 4 роки тому +10

      Couldve been sold to the civilian populace instead i suppose

    • @slamblamboozled1245
      @slamblamboozled1245 4 роки тому +3

      @William Wykoff No. I gave a pretty clear, rational reason.

  • @LtJackboot
    @LtJackboot 4 роки тому +11

    14:57 'Now in terms of long-arms we are out of rifles'. Me, looking behind him says, really?

  • @nate_thealbatross
    @nate_thealbatross 5 років тому +348

    Paper cartridges.
    In trench warfare.
    *stares*
    I'm guessing that the swearing from people issued paper cartridges was audible from space. That is windows on a submarine level stupid.

    • @Anomaly188
      @Anomaly188 5 років тому +53

      After watching so many episodes of the Great War series it's pretty universal that the decision-makers in WW1 were drooling dipshits.

    • @riograndedosulball248
      @riograndedosulball248 5 років тому +20

      Noo... Windows in a submarine can have some utilities. Copying a typical phrase from my country, it's like a car horn... In an aeroplane

    • @LOUDcarBOMB
      @LOUDcarBOMB 5 років тому +6

      There are windows on a submarine that are universal still to today since they're called periscopes (they're also mirrored as well).

    • @Flight_of_Icarus
      @Flight_of_Icarus 5 років тому +6

      I mean it's far from the first dumb decision in WWI. Regardless, this is more of a military supply problem than a bad tactical choice or anything. They used what they had, and what they had was commercially produced paper cartridges. It probably was some army quartermaster arguing that "well they did fine in the last war, and they're easier to get!"

    • @gf4670
      @gf4670 4 роки тому +2

      @@Flight_of_Icarus Yeah. In the 19th Century they used brass shells when shotguns were basically all break action. They were basically just giant shell casings crimped shut. When the pump actions came in is when you really saw paper cartridges become preferred. Why they didn't go with brass shells for the trench guns I don't really know, especially if they were getting a ton of complaints, other than they really weren't different from commercial guns and the action possibly couldn't handle the weight or rigidity of the brass. Or they just didn't care, which is likely in the military.

  • @jimmym5262
    @jimmym5262 5 років тому +75

    Maybe most don’t but I have one of my great uncles personal war diary from ww1 and he was issued a shotgun and 1911 as a bugler. He liked it according to his diary. It could sweep a whole trench if he got the jump on them apparently. But before he was captured he tossed it away as he heard shotgun soldiers were killed and not captured. Whether that was true or not that is what he was told. He was given brass shells though as far as I remember from reading the diary as it’s been a while

    • @BassicBear
      @BassicBear 5 років тому +15

      Brass shells would be correct. It is true that ze Germans didn't like shotgunners. "Sweep the whole trench"? If granddad was a boss, it's not impossible.

    • @jimmym5262
      @jimmym5262 5 років тому +12

      BassicBear well he was a marksman with it before the war as my great uncles and grandfather also went on the poncho villa expedition and had to practice for horse to horse combat with them. Had to ride their horse all the way down from Hartford to Mexico which is ridiculous.

    • @BassicBear
      @BassicBear 5 років тому +5

      @@jimmym5262 sure

    • @jimmym5262
      @jimmym5262 5 років тому +15

      BassicBear that’s what I was told over the years that is. They were national guard so kinda got the cheap end of everything. From what i was told they stopped and trained along the way but took months. But that’s what I’ve been told. I wasn’t there watching in 1917.

    • @Jarod-vg9wq
      @Jarod-vg9wq 5 років тому +2

      He probably only spend a few weeks or months in pow camps.

  • @Bullheadrecords
    @Bullheadrecords 5 років тому +6

    I can’t believe that it’s almost over. One hundred years ago, the first of two of the biggest conflicts in history ended. And yet we still rember each man who fought to this day

  • @nate_thealbatross
    @nate_thealbatross 5 років тому +23

    Number of successful hits past 1,400 yards with incorrectly calibrated sight is equal to the number with a correctly calibrated sight.

  • @absurdist5134
    @absurdist5134 4 роки тому +23

    "Once you know what you're talking about it's a bit pedantic"
    A lesson for every internet argument where people are arguing over definitions.

  • @golddog0113
    @golddog0113 5 років тому +156

    I'm sad that this show will be over in November

    • @golddog0113
      @golddog0113 5 років тому +2

      That's when ww2 ended

    • @golddog0113
      @golddog0113 5 років тому +19

      Hey lol I meant ww1. 1 is right beside the 2!😂

    • @golddog0113
      @golddog0113 5 років тому +1

      Oh ok I didn't know that

    • @golddog0113
      @golddog0113 5 років тому

      Ah smh....

    • @jorda.2412
      @jorda.2412 5 років тому +2

      Opposite of the vets take

  • @timex513
    @timex513 5 років тому +28

    see folks what we have here is a simple shotgun with a point and click interface.

  • @MakeMeThinkAgain
    @MakeMeThinkAgain 5 років тому +11

    Considering that the standard German rifle had sights that were useless at less than 400 yards (?), the paper shotgun shell problem was just a minor SNAFU.

  • @TOTALLYsup
    @TOTALLYsup 5 років тому +23

    LOL Othais just gotta show off his Air-Service.

  • @robbrown5702
    @robbrown5702 5 років тому +8

    I have owned several P-17s and find the Remington version to be my favorite bolt gun. A little heavy as you noted but smooth,accurate and well made.

  • @davidjohansson1459
    @davidjohansson1459 7 місяців тому

    This episode actually is released on my birthday. Denna episod/video är faktiskt släppt på min födelsedag.

  • @TheMoen22
    @TheMoen22 5 років тому +5

    I love these cross over episodes that cover the specific weapons. Great job and keep them coming!

  • @cantbefucked49
    @cantbefucked49 5 років тому +5

    I never thought I'd be a gun guy, but I love these videos! Othias is really great too!

  • @zuovelightning3510
    @zuovelightning3510 5 років тому +58

    Hey Indy could you do WWI knives and trench clubs? Please

    • @gokuss15
      @gokuss15 5 років тому +8

      Zuove Lightning they did. It was a collaboration with inrangetv, it’s over on their channel.

  • @quantitativeease
    @quantitativeease 5 років тому +10

    I love Othias and I am glad this episode was so long, because I hope to eventually watch the unedited videos with him. I am from the South and I miss great fried chicken among other things. I appreciate Othias's nerdiness and great research. He's way better than Tales of the Gun. Anyone who loves peace but also physics and engineering cannot help but find military technology fascinating, so I appreciated his last remark.

  • @panavista70mm29
    @panavista70mm29 5 років тому +8

    Love the content and loads of information each video , keep it going ;)

  • @Owen_5505
    @Owen_5505 5 років тому

    I’ve been waiting on this! Thank you guys

  • @ace_of_beavers9793
    @ace_of_beavers9793 4 роки тому +2

    Man I love the Winchester M1897

  • @whocares427
    @whocares427 5 років тому +88

    In 2120 are you going to start a WW3 show?

    • @heavypupper1219
      @heavypupper1219 5 років тому +2

      Hah lol I hope. I feel it would be more 2119 tho

    • @cousinbocephus8226
      @cousinbocephus8226 5 років тому +1

      As far as i know ww3 is gonna be the end due to slangin nukes at each other but i would hope so

    • @digi7altrauma792
      @digi7altrauma792 5 років тому +10

      Can't wait to hear about space force gunners complaining because they asked for full auto laser blasters, and were given bolt action laser blasters instead.

    • @flipvdfluitketel867
      @flipvdfluitketel867 4 роки тому +2

      @@digi7altrauma792 with paper cartridges

    • @schottiey
      @schottiey 4 роки тому +1

      I do not know with what weaponsWorld War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stone! ~ Albert Einstein

  • @mtnmist1
    @mtnmist1 5 років тому +2

    Excellent point about the paper cartridges!

  • @mikemanners1069
    @mikemanners1069 3 роки тому +5

    Sgt. York actually carried a M1917 Enfield rifle into combat.....not the 1903 Springfield. In the famous Gary Cooper movie where he played Sgt. York it showed him using a 1903 and carrying a Luger.

    • @harrymichaels3877
      @harrymichaels3877 2 роки тому

      Little late but why a Luger?

    • @yorecf9641
      @yorecf9641 Рік тому

      @@harrymichaels3877 also late but the reason I heard was because the studio had access to 9mm blanks but not .45 ACP blanks.

  • @natelowman7646
    @natelowman7646 5 років тому

    Hey I remember you said this would come! Glad to see it! Keep up the awesome work Indy and crew! You guys have put me ahead of my history class!😂

  • @scottlogan9729
    @scottlogan9729 5 років тому +6

    Thank you my own research into shotguns in WWI kept switching between they where great, they had major issues. glad to get real information.

    • @Bruciando
      @Bruciando 5 років тому +1

      Moral of the story: keep your ammo dry, load up with fresh out of the package stuff right b4 the assault & hope for the best...

  • @armin1500
    @armin1500 4 роки тому

    your guys' intro always gives me chills, i dont know why... maybe its the tone of the music, or the footage? i dont know!

  • @fightingbear8537
    @fightingbear8537 5 років тому

    Great video 👍

  • @baron_von_brunk
    @baron_von_brunk 5 років тому +49

    16:29 - Pun intended?

  • @jphil-mk8bw
    @jphil-mk8bw Рік тому

    6:02 “yo fr tho this rifle be straight bussin”

  • @nostradamusofgames5508
    @nostradamusofgames5508 5 років тому +20

    you forgot to mention that mauser sued springfield due to the rifle being so similar to the 1898, they won the case.

    • @BunkerJunker
      @BunkerJunker 5 років тому +2

      As far as I am aware the outbreak of the war prevented any payments to Mauser for copying their design.

    • @teufelhund4921
      @teufelhund4921 5 років тому +2

      We couldve sued them for a thousand different things. Luger for example depended on the Maxim toggle action. An American even funded Georg Mauser's early work. We even gave them the machinegun and the barbed wire.

    • @lynnwood7205
      @lynnwood7205 4 роки тому +1

      Hmm, interesting point. I wonder if an infringement of patent was determined. Then the obligation to pay for the use of their patent.
      Which leads us to where Germany as part of the post war reparations had to sign over patents to American Industry, thus cutting off revenue from patent royalties for Germany to use for reperations payments.
      A whole new chapter to go into.

    • @ferdonandebull
      @ferdonandebull 4 роки тому +4

      Actually they didn’t have to sue.. Springfield recognized they had infringed copyrights in three areas and sent notifications to Mauser .
      A friendly negotiation ended up happening where Springfield paid a relatively small licensing fee.

    • @0Asterite0
      @0Asterite0 4 роки тому +2

      @@ferdonandebull They sued over the spitzer pointed bullet. The US had documentation of their own pointed bullet research so the patent wasn't valid, but since the US confiscated the useless patent illegally, they had to pay up anyway.

  • @Crimethoughtfull
    @Crimethoughtfull 4 роки тому

    The level of detail about heat and vibration and all this stuff that the average person (and clearly the average WWI General) never thinks about. Clearly a knowledgeable gun enthusiast w/o being a gun nutter. Very cool. :-)

  • @DREDCLAN
    @DREDCLAN Рік тому +2

    ❤we need that air force rifle in battlefield 1

  • @danerdog
    @danerdog 5 років тому +23

    Othais and Indy, you left out the US Model 1916 rifle - Remington and Westinghouse Mosin Nagant rifles in 7.62x54R. Fighting for the US did not end until 1919 - reference the Polar Bear Expedition into North Russia.

    • @andreivaldez2929
      @andreivaldez2929 5 років тому +4

      Daner Dog That's just a Russian rifle being produced by Winchester. It technically would be the same thing they'd cover in a video on Russia's weapons.

    • @danerdog
      @danerdog 5 років тому +1

      Andrei Valdez , actually they were made by Remington and Westinghouse. But, they were technically a US-issued rifle for the Polar Bears. Thanks!

    • @Bruciando
      @Bruciando 5 років тому +7

      Go to C&Rsenal's site, watch the *3* episodes on Mosins: Othais covers everything in depth on his channel, but his usual over an hour-long episodes aren't going to fly here as a guest shot [pun intended] on TGW... ;-)

  • @hquiller
    @hquiller 3 місяці тому

    If you ever went hunting with paper shells on a rainy day, you know what he's talking about.
    Got a jam after the fist shot and had to disassemble the shotgun to remove the other shells from the magazine and pieces of the shell from the barrel.
    Never used them again.

  • @tamlandipper29
    @tamlandipper29 2 роки тому +1

    I cannot overstate how relaxed and nice C&Rsenal is. Do check them out.

  • @thebeanzgriffins2346
    @thebeanzgriffins2346 4 роки тому +1

    I have shot the m17 and it is amazing you hit everything you aim at

  • @altonfrancisco8027
    @altonfrancisco8027 5 років тому

    BTW love the show!

  • @milankolarski8876
    @milankolarski8876 5 років тому

    Hey guys, awesome video as usual. I just wonder how long does it take to clean all of those guns and rifles ? I mean the properly cleaning (the leaky tube and the rest of the guns and rifles). :D

  • @CrossOfBayonne
    @CrossOfBayonne 5 років тому

    My fav is the springfield and some of my friends trained on it prior to the transitioning to the M1 Garand.

  • @Punchmckic
    @Punchmckic 5 років тому

    I know only about the Krag-Jorgensen because hackers seem to love using it in Battlefield V. It's kinda cool to learn more about it!

  • @Dsdcain
    @Dsdcain 5 років тому +3

    I remember watching this live. *:)*

    • @eRahja
      @eRahja 5 років тому

      Inrange have video on that made for the great war

  • @hanzwillford5141
    @hanzwillford5141 5 років тому +1

    Nice

  • @thomas_asunto
    @thomas_asunto 5 років тому +14

    Germans: Das ist too OP. Please Don't Use Shotguns in the battle. Ist inhumane.
    Americans: Nope, Did you use Mustard Gas and Flamethrower?

    • @bandit5747
      @bandit5747 5 років тому +5

      germany: NIEN! Shotguns nicht gud
      Entente: what about-
      Germany: **kicks mustard gas and flamthrowers under the table**

  • @MisterMan-md9kz
    @MisterMan-md9kz 2 роки тому +2

    America:(useing shotguns) Germany:UNFAIRRRR
    also Germany:mp18 ment for clearing trench’s

  • @trapperscout2046
    @trapperscout2046 2 роки тому +1

    The army that gave paper shotgun cartridges to it's troops for trench combat is the same army that would issue "Universal" Camouflage Pattern uniforms to its troops for desert combat three-quarters of a century later.

  • @johnqpublic2718
    @johnqpublic2718 5 років тому +1

    Yay!

  • @rayyanma1608
    @rayyanma1608 3 роки тому +3

    Very late to the party, but I think if World War I continued into 1919, the problems with the shotgun shells would have probably been solved. Imagine how effective and devastating those would have been.

  • @indianajones4321
    @indianajones4321 5 років тому +47

    Weapons time

  • @cseivard
    @cseivard 5 років тому +4

    The shotgun info was fascinating. It dismisses the conventional wisdom. Genuine research!

  • @DeadBoyHK1
    @DeadBoyHK1 5 років тому +2

    I wonder if Jeff Cooper knew about that Springfield M1903 air service. I say that, because it almost fits his description of what he wanted for a scout rifle... Almost.

    • @blairbuskirk5460
      @blairbuskirk5460 4 роки тому

      Too heavy with that huge box mag of 25 rounds of 30-06. I think a standard Springfield 1903 fits closer to the bill.

    • @marks_sparks1
      @marks_sparks1 3 роки тому +1

      Both 1903s variants are too heavy for a Scout rifle unless they are lightened significantly. Cooper specified max 3kg limit as the rifle was going to be carried a lot and shot very little by frontiersman, survivalist or military scout.

  • @Jarod-vg9wq
    @Jarod-vg9wq 5 років тому +1

    The Krag Jorgensen is one of my favourite rifle❤️

  • @QseftJohn
    @QseftJohn 5 років тому +16

    Boom! C&Rsenal disproves another myth

  • @timhimes3649
    @timhimes3649 4 роки тому

    Enjoying the show, I have a 10 gauge flare pistol made by Remington for use in WW1I really can’t find any information. I’ve contacted Remington and they really have nothing either. Can you maybe find more information on this.

  • @markg117
    @markg117 4 роки тому

    My Buddy has his Grandfather"s Krag Jorgensen which he carried in France in the Great War. I believe his Grandfather was an MP and was either a reservist or a Pennsylvania National Guardsman and was in a support role. So some Krag's did make it to Europe. Great job guys!

  • @FrttMs
    @FrttMs 5 років тому +2

    Fun fact: I believe the Danish Sirius Patrol still use the M1917 (or a version of it) known as the M/53 on Greenland. 100 years after it's implementation.

    • @slamblamboozled1245
      @slamblamboozled1245 4 роки тому

      Didn't they upgrade to more modern .308s? Like the Canadian rangers who recently ditched their Lee Enfields.

    • @HaNsWiDjAjA
      @HaNsWiDjAjA Рік тому

      @@slamblamboozled1245 No those hardy Danes still retained their WW1 rifles. It still works perfectly for their need so why change it? The original rifles are still available in significant numbers, and parts are even still being manufactured for the US civilian market.
      They are using mostly civilian. 30-06 hunting ammo, which is perhaps the most widely available hunting ammo in the world, so sourcing it is hardly a problem. And the tiny extra oomph of the .30-06 over the .308 is not exactly a bad thing to have, when the primary purpose of the gun is fending off polar bears and musk ox.
      They do carry the modern Glock 20 pistol chambered in the very powerful 10mm auto cartridge though, which again is because of the polar bear issue.

  • @toddjlyons
    @toddjlyons Рік тому

    My Grandfather carried a 30-40 Krag in WW1. He got to keep it but he had it sporterized in the 1930s.

  • @pat8988
    @pat8988 2 роки тому +1

    Love the video, but why doesn’t the speaker ever tell us what the barrel length?

  • @sgtmayhem7567
    @sgtmayhem7567 2 роки тому +1

    The complaints from the German regarding the use of the US use of shotguns wasn’t politically motivated. It was because of the wounds caused by buckshot, there are 8 .33 caliber pellets in each shell and in the days before x-rays it was extremely difficult for doctors to locate all the pellets.

  • @kkpppgjhv
    @kkpppgjhv 4 роки тому

    its weird i got this gut feeling that indy is probably a real nice person

  • @danditto4864
    @danditto4864 3 роки тому +1

    U.S. Army Ordinance continued to issue paper cartridges Calvary carbines throughout the Civil War, even though they already had access to carbines with brass or Gutta perch’s cartridges. Logic was not their strength.

  • @andrewdavidson9171
    @andrewdavidson9171 5 років тому +1

    What did left handed people use? The bolt on the right side of the rifle sounds clumsy to operate if you're a left.

  • @willsee1822
    @willsee1822 2 роки тому +1

    My great grandfather wrote in his diary of carrying a karg in France. While on MP duty in the great war.

  • @forthrightgambitia1032
    @forthrightgambitia1032 5 років тому +2

    More of a out of the trenches question, but do you have any information on the Catalan volunteers for the French army? I ask because I've been living in Barcelona a few years and there is a fairly large monument in the Montjuic cemetery to them. It seems to have been allowed to remain in some form during the years of the Franco regime, despite the fact that it is now a small shire to the Catalan independence project, but is not a topic widely discussed in the books I've read. Of course the Catalans living in the French part of what in Spain they call Northern Catalonia obviously fought in the war like any other French citizens, but the suggestion seems to be that said Catalans wished to fight alongside their Catalan brother in arms and saw affirming their traditional connection to France and its identity as part of the development of the Catalan nation consciousness.

    • @williamkeith8944
      @williamkeith8944 4 роки тому

      Not well noted in English, more remembered in Spanish and French history.

  • @thekalamazookid4481
    @thekalamazookid4481 5 місяців тому

    Springfield and Enfield have been beefing it out for the hearts of American service men since the 1860s lol

  • @owenwolfco.8344
    @owenwolfco.8344 5 років тому

    So the shotguns were very effective in trench warFare, but the ammunition jammed up a lot? How did the brass cased ones do? I’m asking because I want to know if it still had popularity...

  • @rajyavardhan8593
    @rajyavardhan8593 4 роки тому

    Yes the weapon designers had their own limitations I read in a farewell to arms that the Austrians had something called the potato mashers it just had explosive in them filled with all forms of chips of metals even screws and bolts

  • @archstanton5113
    @archstanton5113 5 років тому +26

    aargh, where are the firing segments!!!

    • @canicheenrage
      @canicheenrage 5 років тому +10

      C&Rsenal youtube channel. :)

    • @warshipsatin8764
      @warshipsatin8764 4 роки тому

      dude theyre common old bolt actions and a common pump shotgun, you can find plenty of videos of them firing and its not a big deal. this is about the history of them

  • @thebeanzgriffins2346
    @thebeanzgriffins2346 4 роки тому +1

    The model 97 Winchester doesn't have a trigger disconnect so you can pump the whole tube in a few seconds

    • @dmytro732
      @dmytro732 2 роки тому

      Same with the Remington Model 10, Winchester Model 12, and Ithaca M37. Most early pump shotguns were capable of slam fire.

  • @pudgeboyardee32
    @pudgeboyardee32 3 роки тому +2

    What about rice? Soldiers in SE asia mightve stored their ammo in rice to keep it dry. Any reports of that? Might help explain how exactly they managed to keep rounds dry during periods of longer exposure.

  • @GunDrone
    @GunDrone 4 роки тому +2

    The 1903 Springfield did have an issue you neglected to mention. During the making of the receiver and error was made that the heat treating was guessed at instead of measured. This made some 1903's burst when fired. There were at least 6 cases of this happening before the problem was fixed. There are certain serial numbers they suggest you should not fire because they have this issue.

  • @StarDark4
    @StarDark4 5 років тому

    I have a question maybe he mentioned it but i missed it, what about firing slugs out of the shotgun? Why didn't they fire slugs its lethal at close range and has stopping power that along with a bayonet seems pretty lethal close up, also no paper wrapping. With support from riflemen and a light gunner in a small storm trooper like squad, that seems lethal and efficient.

  • @killuminatepeacefulness3948
    @killuminatepeacefulness3948 5 років тому

    I cant wait for ww2 content

  • @crazyzombiebos7778
    @crazyzombiebos7778 5 років тому +3

    Mr Nidel and Crew what do you guys think about the 1939 novel Johnny Got His Gun based in World war 1. What was the closest situation in real life Joe Bonham faced?

    • @gordonholon
      @gordonholon 5 років тому +1

      Landmine has taking my sight taken my speech taken my hearing

  • @brokenbridge6316
    @brokenbridge6316 4 роки тому +1

    I loved this episode. American guns were great. Shame the US couldn't make enough of them. Great job.

  • @voobroo297
    @voobroo297 7 місяців тому

    They were issued brass shelled rounds.

  • @cavscout888
    @cavscout888 Рік тому +1

    The British didn't design the 1917 or even the 1913/14. They actually took Springfield 1903 rifles, the physical rifles, and made as many of their desired changes as they could without actually having to really do any design work. They never 'designed it for modern manufacturing.' It already was, because it was an American designed rifle.

    • @atfyoutubedivision955
      @atfyoutubedivision955 Рік тому +1

      Not even close. The patern 13/14 were designed in the UK, the 1903 had nothing to do with it.

    • @cavscout888
      @cavscout888 Рік тому

      @@atfyoutubedivision955 It's documented dude. This is why the P13 is just a Springfield 1903 and only the 'requirements' implemented for the 'P13' were ones that you could unskillfully tack on to a 1903. Even the bend in the charging handle was lazy.

  • @McNubbys
    @McNubbys 5 років тому

    (Preps caps locked fury on the shotgun...pauses)...I will wait, in Othias I trust lol🤣

  • @andreasnielsen75
    @andreasnielsen75 3 роки тому +2

    I have Seen the original bluprint of that gun

  • @BilgePump
    @BilgePump 4 роки тому +1

    We gotta remember they woulda hadta waterproof the cartridges with what he had. Can u imagine what mighta happened if they decided use Shellac?

  • @bennettguns3809
    @bennettguns3809 3 роки тому +1

    I truly do not understand Utube's subscribe policies? I've subscribed to yours and many other gunvideo channels but, have never received any kind of notices for any of them?

  • @moosemaimer
    @moosemaimer 5 років тому

    The Mythbusters tested shooting live grenades with different guns, and shotguns effectively dismantled them and prevented an explosion. High-velocity rifle rounds produced enough of an impact to detonate the main charge, much like a tannerite bomb.

    • @andreivaldez2929
      @andreivaldez2929 5 років тому +1

      moosemaimer Yeah but how often is someone going to throw a grenade high enough for someone who just happens to be at the ready with his shotgun to shoot it in midair? It could possibly have happened but it's not something that's practical.

  • @Cdre_Satori
    @Cdre_Satori 5 років тому +1

    Strange, I watched the peterson device episode and got the idea that it was a great idea that came too late. And if you combined it with that Airforce gun you would get longer M1 carabine in ww1 I suppose (

  • @loetzcollector466
    @loetzcollector466 3 роки тому +1

    Usefulness aside, I want a Winchester 1897 trench gun. That has to be the meanest looking fun of all time.

  • @jtstonewallaggieclassof2005
    @jtstonewallaggieclassof2005 4 роки тому

    Why no mention of the Browning A5?

  • @mr_chillmann6316
    @mr_chillmann6316 4 роки тому +1

    Im ging to play bf1 now

  • @Jarod-vg9wq
    @Jarod-vg9wq 5 років тому +2

    How effective was the Springfield and BAR rifle on the front of the war?

    • @Pijawek
      @Pijawek 5 років тому +1

      Springfield was your standard bolt action rifle. Not bad, bit nothing special compared to others. BARs were efficoent for covering fire etc. but there were too little of them.

  • @COLEBURRUP
    @COLEBURRUP 10 місяців тому

    My great great grandpa carried a krag in the battle of the Argonne forest.

  • @thebeanzgriffins2346
    @thebeanzgriffins2346 4 роки тому +1

    Dum dum ammo is actually not blunt nosed ammo rather ammo produced at Dum Dum arsenal in India

  • @jacrispy3275
    @jacrispy3275 4 роки тому +5

    Germany: no trenchguns, ist cruel and inhumane.
    America: *how bout I do anyway?*

  • @WalterBurton
    @WalterBurton 4 роки тому

    So about those shotguns.... :-)