WW2 British and Allies Tank Type and Size Comparison 3D
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 сер 2024
- Sherman Firefly has arrived ! WWII British and Allies Tank Type and Size Comparison
Tank Type
Light tanks
Cruiser tanks
Infantry tanks
Medium tanks
Tank Destroyers
Heavy tanks
Tanks
Vickers 6-Ton
Vickers Mk VI
Vickers Medium Mark II
Cruiser Tank MK I
Cruiser Tank MK III
Cruiser Tank MK II
Cruiser Tank MK IV
Cruiser Tank MK V
Cruiser Tank MK VI
Cruiser Tank MK VII
Cruiser Tank MK VIII Cromwell
Cruiser Tank MK VIII Challenger
Matilda Mk I
Matilda MKII
M4 Sherman
M4A1 Sherman
M4A2 Sherman
M4A3 Sherman
Sherman Firefly
M3 Grant
M3 Stuart
Carro Armato M13/40
Infantry Tank Mk III Valentine
Infantry Tank Mk IV Churchill
Carro Armato M14/41
M5 Stuart
M22 Locust
M24 Chaffee
T-14
TOG 2
Like, Share and Subscribe to AmazingViz
Help me grow this channel
Music by MultiMusic
Multi - Era of War
• [Copyright Free Orches...
Epic Battle Speech
• 🎵 Epic Battle Speech -...
3D Models
Own creations
3D Warehouse ( Awesome )
Modified and textured
Software
Google Sketchup ( Best intuitive 3D software )
can British out view Germany ? 🤔 ua-cam.com/video/eub93nHvn8Q/v-deo.html
or Soviet union ua-cam.com/video/KWaF9hLFdmQ/v-deo.html
The 1st Tank destroyer is not the Archer, its called the Gun Carrier 17-pounder Achilles.
AmazingViz the Sherman Firefly *is not* a TD
The firefly is basically a M4 with its 75mm replaced by a 17-pounder, its still a medium tank.
Tanveer Ahmed
FUCKING EXACTLY
The archer here is normally named the Achilles end the archer is a 17pounder monted on a velantine
*TOG II looking thicc*
Americans tanks be like: Sherman m4a6e9f21c64h7j8k1d2
Couple of Mistakes but a "Somewhat" good video
We aren’t paying attention to detail we just wanna watch
@@sawyerowen278 as long as its mostly accurate it's fine for me
The Universal Carrier and Lloyd Carrier aren’t tanks, they’re AFVs, also when it says the tank destroyer Archer it shows the M10 Achilles.
The first "tank destoryer" that looks like an M10 is actually "Achilles", not "Archer", similar to Sherman Firefly, the American M10's 76mm gun was interchanged with British 17-pdr gun (I mean look at the main armament description in the video), and is named "Achilles". It is one of the less well known adaption done by British tank design. And for the "Archer" namesake, it refers to the adaptation of Valentine infantry tank being armed with the aforementioned 17-pdr. I mean search the Archer tank destroyer (if you're curious) and compare with the picture and you will be surprised. This is not to put a dagger to the content developer, but it helps to remind the authenticity of historical accuracy is paramount and should not be understated.
Factory: so how many Sherman variants do you want?
America: *yes*
It was a modified model
"Hmmm im going to total forget the original design for the archer and use the Achilles model insted" is what i imagined what went through their heads
You're right, the Archer is a 17 pounder valentine not a wolverine.
lou val it’s not even a tank destroyer lmao it’s an SPG
It’s funny to me how the Pershing and other tanks didn’t make it to the list, but two transports made it to Light Tanks
this viz mainly for British tanks and lease lend of Sherman to UK. will make another viz for WWII US tanks :)
AmazingViz Thanks, love the models :)
How many war thunder players here then? ;)
Sgt.Vittie yeah and did he get archer mixed with another British tank? Archer and M10
Me lol
That’s definitely not what an archer looks like.
Yeah this is an achilles
Yea I was gonna say
3:42 . Its not Archer, its M10 Wolverine!
They are the same like Wolverine, T25/2, Hellcat, Archer, Achilles, M10. Its the same model. But its still Archer.
That's not a Archer and the Sherman Firefly is not a tank destroyer it's a medium tank!
The archer looks like a achilles
And isn't the Church Hill mk 7 50 tones not 40
Well it's a Sherman that mounted a 17 pounder so its quite obviously intended to destroy _something_
The Firefly was intended to be a tank destroyer.
@@southamptontrainspotter553The archer does not look like the fucking Achilles, the archer's gun is backwards and does not have a turret, unlike the Achilles, the archer's engine is at the front and you need to turn the entire vehicle to shoot the enemy at your front
you forgot the M26 pershing heavy tank
At 3:44 that's not archer, but Achilles, while the Archer is missing completely
Also, Pershing tank is missing
Also Sherman firefly isn't tank destroyer, but rather a medium tank
Pershing was an American tank
This was mostly just what the Brits made and were lent by allies
Everything is missing.
@@kingappollyon "Mostly" because Americans never gave M4A3s (also E8s) to anyone, what they usually lent was M4A2s, not even M4s and M4A1s (because they put the 76mm gun on them and wet ammo stowage)
they forgot about Avengger...
I don’t really think that’s an Archer. It’s a M10 Wolverine, correct?
PhotographerDonn yeah but its got a 17 pounder
It's an Achilles.
Tank destroyers:
Archer **shows pic of an M10*
Where is the M18?
Where is the Jackson?
Where is the Tortoise?
And where is the T95?!
And the Firefly is not a tank desoroyer! Is a medim with a 17 pounder. If the criteria for TDs is big guns, why is the Challenger a cruiser tank? Has a 17 pounder. Is on a medium chasis
Well the tortoise and the t95 didn't see service but I agree with you
@Commander Biswas yes ik, wot is kinda bs. But the Challenger is designated as a cruiser tank with an AT gun and the Firefly is a MEDIUM tank, not a tank destroyer!
@@arthurmorgan4434 Neither did the TOG.
The tortoise never made it to WW2
@@firepower7017 neither the TOG or the T14, but you dont see me complaining about it
Archer is actually an M10 17lb Acillies IIc, you are missing the Archer which is a backward facing Valentine with casemate and 17lb gun ?
Title: Archer
*Showing Achilles*
That's not an Archer, it's an Achilles, and the Firefly is not a tank destroyer, it's a medium tank
Due to its long range attack capability Firefly is considered as tank destroyer.
@@srisunkrish3513 source?
@@astrorick2910 According to Sherman class tanks Firefly is armed with 17 pounder anti tank, due to that it has long range attack when compared to other Sherman classes, usually tank destroyers got long range attack.
www.militaryfactory.com/armor/detail.asp?armor_id=248
please refer this.
@@srisunkrish3513 yeah but they classified as medium tanks
This video was interesting, however the director is confused about TDs, labelling the Achilles as "Archer" and not showing the Archer at all. The Firefly was an upgunned Medium, not a TD.
@@p00t77 all Firefly Shermans were used in platoons alongside 75mm tanks.
How can you fuck up on the Archer.. the thing you showed is legit an M10 wolverine..
And the Firefly IS NOT a Tank Destroyer, it's a Medium Tank..
And you forgot the M4A3E2, it's a heavy tank..
Actually it might be Achilles - British version of M10 Wolverine with 17-pounder gun
M4A3E2 Jumbo its an assault tank, reinforced armour for break enemy lines
The Sherman Firefly is not a tank destroyer,but a medium tank with a 17 pounder
even if its a destroyer its still a tank
You mean its gun weigh 17 pound?
TIGER P no the 17 pounder was a 76.2mm caliber anti tank gun
@@p00t77 wait, weren't they high velocity or something like that
the title: M3 Stuart
*showing an M5 Stuart*
M3 Grant ❌
M3 Lee ⭕️
AmazingViz is not really military fan by the way. Appreciate his work but he always made mistakes on the stats. Hope he'll come up with modern tanks comparison next.
ehhhhhhh both are O, it was known as the Lee in USA, and Grant in UK, also, the Acher wasn't a M10 Wolf, it was an arse backwards tank, meaning it was driving with the arse towards the action, XD
Oh,
I was not studying enough.📝
It’s not an M10, it’s an Achilles. British M10 variant carrying a British 17 lb. anti-tank gun.
The Grant and the Lee are two slightly different tanks. The difference is in the turret and the placement of the radio, with the Lee having the radio in the hull and the Grant having the Radio in the Turret, allowing the 37mm loader double up as the radio operator, giving the Grant a crew of 6, instead of the Lee's crew of 7. The Grant was almost exclusively used by the British, while the Lees were used by the Americans and some were sent to Russia. The tank depicted in the video is a Lee, but the crew of 6 that is stated in the video is correct for the Grant
This is not Archer ( in 3:40 ) but Achilles. Archer looked completely different. And many other tanks are missing.
The backwards tank
What about the light tank mk4 with a 15mm besa machine gun it is missing in the light tank section
Crusader and tortoise is missing too.
il Magnifico
Crusader is there.
Tortoise is a bit too obscure.
ApacheHelicopter i saw the second time! You're right!
The archer is an achilles, the archer was backwards, had the gun mounted above the engine, so it could reverse into position then drive away quickly when spotted.
Where’s the Comet, Excelsior and Black Prince?
SticksandStones the black prince was never used in ww2 only prototyped
what is italian M13-40 doing in this video?
The tank destroyer labeled as an Archer is actually an Achilles. The Archer was built on a Valentine chassis with the rear of the tank facing forward.
3:40 It is an Archilles, a British modified M10 with 17-pounder. NOT Archer. Completely different.
The archer is a turretless td that usually has a fast reverse speed and your right there
The hull of the Archer is same chassi as valentine
William Johanzon just reversed. The gun’s on backwards
You do know the Sherman was in service from 1942, it's first action was the Kassarine Pass in North Africa.
Churchills almost all have hull mounted weapons (Where is Crocodile?)
The T14 was NEVER deployed or mass produced, it was a prototype only.
The Challenger is technically a tank destroyer just like the Achilles and Wolverine.
Neither the TOG and the T14 where deployed
3:49 that's the achilles, it's not the archer
Ikr , the creator doesnt seem to notice it
M10
@@ronnievosco1298 and m18
Hellcat m18 wolverine m10
M36 Jackson
The Archer was on the Valentine Chassis, the “Archer” you’re 3D render shows is the Achilles, based off the M10 Wolverine. But with a 17pdr gun. A much better gun by comparison.
3:40 that's not an archer, it is an achilles
The archer is very different
Panzerjäger Nashorn 100 % difference
Panzerjäger Nashorn also the M3 is a lee not a grant because the grant was a British version
Archers a valentine on steriods
1.09 this is M3 Lee. Grand had modified turret
Are you mad or what? Was Sherman Firefly a tank destroyer?
No it isn't, it's a tank that has a 17 pounder shoved so far up your ass
Yes it was
@@200010michal it was a medium
@@gas8828 british treated them like TDs, less games more books
When they call sherman firefly tanks as tank destroyers but cannot penetrate Tiger's front and side armor only the rear. wtf
Explain this kind of bullshitery
Edit: or maybe its a modified sherman firefly mounted with an anti-tank gun
Where is M36 Jackson, M5 Stuart, Where is Comet, Where is M6a1, Churchill 3,Where is Light Vic, Where is Covenanter ??????
And the Tetrarch?
And B1
@@pierreguillermet3665 B1 is a french tank
Video: Here are British and the Allies tank comparsion in 3D!
Me who expected the AC1 and AC3 in the cruiser tank part: My disappointed is immeasurable and my day ruined
Why is the Achiles tank destroyer named the archer, the archer is completely different
* Sherman jumbo left the chat*
3:35 it's not archer
It's Achilles
It doesnt even look like an achilles XD
3:42 thats not an archer...
Probably an jackson
@@cosmin7414 It's an Achilles.
Hmm, where is M6? it wasn’t shipped to combat but at least got itself into testing
Jerry Huynh to be fair if they're gonna feature the Covenantor (which was the least successful LMS design of WW2, loosing out to the 8F locomotive) they should feature the M6
Not brittish
you sure that Wherman Firefly is a TD? lol
Yep
Sherman. It specifically said medium tank under it.
Its medium bruh :')
Wherman?
It Carries 17 pounder anti tank gun, so yes
3:39 that’s not an archer
Yes, that's M10 Achiles
You want a cookie?
@@pomp5216 No, thanks
Its actually Wolverine
Wait that wolverine is not a archer
No it is a Achilles, wolverine was American and it was carrying a 17 pounder cannon
You missed the Tetrarch Mk VII and the Achilles Tank Destroyer. And the Comet I, the Daimler, the Black Prince... :))
Hey, where is black prince? (Or churchill mk Vll, modification Black prince)
The Black Prince was ready at the end of the war, it was just a wider Churchill Mk. VII with the same armor profile, engine and speed but a new weapon.
Also, The Black Prince is not a Churchill 7. They're very different.
This has several problems:1:Italy wan not an Allied
2:that M3 Grant was a M3 Lee(The m3 grand existed but had a different turret, and didnt had a radioman)
3: That 'archer' was an Achilles
Italy was allied from 1943-45, British Army refer to it as the archer, Americans call it the Achilles
Also I'm pretty sure the Sherman's are bigger than the cruisers
@@fable1109 there was a tank called the archer at had a 17pdr mounted on a Valentine chassis backwards, so the video is not correct in calling it the archer it's the achilles
Ah yes the Sherman Firefly what a beautiful TANK DESTROYER
It had a anti tank gun fitted into it so it makes it a tank destroyer
@@Telmuun.amartuvshin The firefly was classifed as a Medium tank and if you dont belive me search it up
@@Lore_Thunder i just did one source said it is a tank destroyer and tha other one said its a medium tank
@@Telmuun.amartuvshin Which source said it was a tank destroyer?
3:47 he put it as a medium tank
3:39 that things is not an archer I think it's a wolverine (correct me if I am not right)
ButIDon'tKnow 2019 hun it’s a Achilles TD
@@mndunkerque2497 thanks🍆
Why is there a eggplant?
The Achilles uses a 17 pounder gun (76.2 mm) and is built on the M10 wolverine
@@mndunkerque2497 soo... innocent
The archer is not an M10 tank destroyer. Thats an Achilles Also What is that stuart tank? also the firefly was a medium
TANK DESTROYERS
*Sherman Firefly*
Type: Medium tank
seems legit
Missing a few tanks
3:46 It's not Archer in the graphic (It's Wolverine or Achilles)
Also, the image you used for the Archer isn't the correct one. And the T-14 was a prototype assault tank, not a heavy tank.
The Archer they showed was actually the Achilles
If he put T-14 it’s incorrect, the americans had the T14, T-14 is the T-14 Armata.
TOGll was super slow and very long.
Chuchill crocodile had a flamethrower and it one of my favourite tanks.
Churchill Mark I:
*Does my very existence as a tank that led to a new line of Churchills not exist to you?*
3:48 What Sherman Firefly is a TD
in World of Tanks yes in real life no (in wot couse of its gun its classified as a td but it real life its a medium tank like all of the shermans )
The archer is actually an M10 tank destroyer
No it's the m10 wolverine
Negative its an Achilles.... Not a wolverine
@@Fiberous_Pulley Achilles* wolverine had a shorter barreled 76mm whereas the Achilles has the British 17 pdr
Oh yeah it is Achilles. Sry
No archer this Achilles 🙂😄
I can say you are a good 3D modeler, but not good at gathering and organizing information. You should work with good historian or some specialists to make a great video!!
There are many tanks that hasn’t been added into this video, and I found the choice and arrangement of tanks are a bit weird. How can you call a universal carrier, a vehicle mainly designed for transportation of infantry and small firearms,as a tank? If T14, a tank never entered into the battle, is in the video, why another planned tank, Excelsior, cannot be in the video? Comet is the LAST tank of cruiser series, one of the distinguished features of British tanks. Where is it??? and so on.... :(
The Centaur was also missing.
Tog best tank tho
American tanks: exist*
British Army: *PIMP MY TANK*
What you call Archer is actually an Achilles I think. Good video though!
I went to the tank museum at bovington and saw the oldest Sherman surviving Sherman tank and comparing the different aspects compared to the newer versions was quite fun
What
@@helenward4342 it’s was sent to England from America as a sample piece and it is apparently the oldest Sherman surviving it also has a nickname( Michael)
Lol the Churchill VII is listed as having the 95mm Howitzer, not its actual 75mm gun. The mk.VI was the howitzer equipped variant
You mean the Mk VIII, The Mark VI was a Mark IV up gunned to 75mm.,
*tank destroyers*
*shows sherman firefly*
“Type: medium tank”
Stingy's Hairline there were actually different variants of the Sherman firefly,one version was a medium tank and the other a Tank destroyer and another variant
The M4 Sherman became the Sherman Ic
The M4 composite Sherman became the Sherman Ic Hybid
And the M4A4 Sherman became the Sherman vc
All of these variants were the Sherman firefly
A duck They probably came straight from world of tanks before seeing this video, they don’t know what they are saying.
Italy was in axis not allies
Italy Surrendered On 1943 and Joined The allies
Norbert Brodnicki: Italy changed sides in 1943 and declared war on Germany so from that point onwards they were allies.
learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/13/oct-13-1943-italy-switches-sides-in-world-war-ii/
Why is Italian tank doing here?
Captured vehicle
You dont know that italy join allies ?
@@sovietunion9241 oh right, I forgot
1st: Sherman Firefly was a medium tank, like Easy Eight, which are comparable. 2nd: It's not an Archer but Achilles. So on, if american and british tanks are presented, why you missed M10 Wolverine, M36 Jackson, M18 Hellcat, A34 Comet, M26 Pershing? And proper Archer?
The M3 Grant was actually a British variant which removed the radio man and moved the radio up to the commander and the main 37 mm turret
1:10 I know these are details but I think M3 grant doesn't have commanders turret so this might be just M3 Lee
They are the same vehicle.
@@CatAdvantage well yes but actually no
czech ace in exile
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/M3_Lee
Same tank with different gun
This IS M3 Lee
M3 Lee and M3 Grant are the same, the difference is that the first one is American service and the second one is British service, AKA the same as Sherman 76 and Sherman firefly, both objectively the same but British versions are just modified for their "pounder" guns.
Your Archer its an M10 Achilles (british version of the american M10 Wolverine)
Churchill got me at the end :D
Hmmm i smell some "PRO TANK" that based on WOT OR WT in the comment section
They are spreading cringe cause they play WoT and they think that they know everything but inside they are bot tomatos
Actually, real facts. Lol
Ikr these people think everything in wot saw service in ww2
@@awsomeoperation2405 and thats as far from the truth as possible lol. IS-7. Very popular in wot. Only 2 prototypes where made. 1 is in Kubinka tank museum in Belarus. Didnt see combat. Centurion AX, bluebrint tank. Any KV from the KV-2 are bp tanks. E50/50M, E25, E10 aka Leopard (not Leopard 1) are all blueprint tanks. The whole japanese and chinese tech tree are almost fully made out of bp tanks. The only tech trees that are made out of IRL built tanks are the 277 line, old IS-7 line, STRV 103 B and Kranvagn line and the Obj 268 line. And to ad to that, not every tank that was built and tested saw combat. Look at the Maus. Built, tested, never saw combat. Same with the IS-7, T-10 (M) and the IS-4 (M)
@@guvyygvuhh298 Yes but people think the t95, a39 tortoise, the m46 patton, and the centurion with many others saw combat in ww2 im am not saying they never existed because the m46 patton and the centurion did see service after the war im saying that wot players dont know what was massproduced or is only a prototype.
People said "where is the other tanks"
But they never said "thank you for vid" 🙁
I really like his videos, bit there are quite a bit of tanks missing here
Farell Hartono: Okay, thank you for the video. Now, where are the other tanks?
TO EVERY WORLD OF TANKS FAN
1:TANKS SHOWED IN THE VID ARE MOST PRODUCED HISTORICAL TANKS
2:YES ITS ACHILLES
3:DONT EXPECT ANY FV IN THIS VID
4:WOT ISNT A SIMULATION, ITS RPG.
5:IM WRITING THIS WITH CAPS LOCK BECAUSE YOU ARE ANNOYING, PLS STOP SPREADING CRINGE.
PS: You think that you know everything about tanks cause you play wot? Inside you are a tomato bot.
I have a joke about Tog but its too long.
Truee
This doesn't mean Wot is bad. Btw before you start hating WoT, atleast look at its genre. It is MMO.
@@tomiik5195 bruh... I didny say that WoT is shit. I play WoT.
@@tomiik5195 what is MMO? WoT is rpg
@@gooberbunchofrandomnumbers ITS NOT ARCHER
ITS ACHILLES DUMB PERSON
IF HE DOESN`T KNOW THE NAMES MAYBE HE SHOULD DO SOME F-ING RESEARCH BEFORE
I'm confused, theres the T14 Assault tank prototype and even the TOG II but no Comet I, M26, M36 Jackson, M18 Hellcat, M10. The M3 light tank is a M5 variant. Am I missing something
This person probably forgot about it, I mean. Can’t really blame this person since there was so much vehicles from the allies (including prototypes and on paper designs). For example the Pershing.
Man, Tank fanatics like me are cringing so hard in the comment section...but at least you tried...next time just try do a little more research.
What about the Comet tank?
Excuse me, but Poland is also allies, and I didn't see any TKS in the beginning
So are the soviets
I like how Matilda 1 is like just bones and then Matilda II is like chad level upgrade
Great vid, but I gotta say, there's a lot more tanks missing here and made some mistakes
That's an Achilles man
Just feel like pointing out that the tank shown in place of an Archer is an Achilles. Which is based off an M10, whereas the Archer was based off a valentine and is probably one of the most interesting TDs ever produced. Honest mistake, just felt like pointing it out. :)
That M3 Stuart looks more like an M5 Stuart. Overall though, the models look pretty accurate. Keep up the good work. We'll be glad to see more in the future.
3:44 that’s not the Archer
if its not the archer what is that???
Memes Hunter I know it’s not the archer search it up
It's the Achilles
@@zyrondevera4561 it was m10 achilles
It's the wolverine
Where tf are archer,sexton,locust,calliope M6,wolverine,hellcat,jackson,pershing gone mate?
Hi, this viz mainly for British tanks and lease lend of Sherman to UK. will make another viz for WWII US tanks :)
XANDER PIPO They’re on vacation bro
@@AmazingViz and the tetrarch?
@@AmazingViz and the Harry Hopkins
End the real archer the archer here I normally named Achilles
According to LindyBeige the universal carrier is actually an armored battle taxi.
TOOOOOOG II!
TOG was "The Old Guard" - designers who worked originally on WW-I tanks!
Where is A34 comet
And the french tank
The churchill crocodile had a towed bowser for the fuel for the flame thrower
M3 grant (UK version m3 lee) is by UK M3 LEE IS FOR USA
And the tank pictured is the Lee (British designation for the US pattern M3 used by the British and its Commonwealth), not the Grant (UK exclusive variant) as is labeled.
The M4 Sherman series of tanks started in service in 1942 not 1944
Thank you
Sherman firefly is not a TANK DESTROYER it's medium tank
yes
Its made from us
That explains why the Matilda I has never entered any services in games
Love seeing Italy in there
They switched sides though lol