Thank you for watching. Comments are welcomed and encouraged - what do you think? I heart comments I have seen, and reply to those UA-cam notifies me off. FEEDBACK: 1:04:47 Citation numbers should be 55 not 4 KEY COMMENTS:
i love it when YT algorithm recomends me randomlly a hour or more long video, on a topic that i'm mindlly interested in by a small channel that i never seen before.
Thanks! This was an amazing watch. It made me wonder how those ideas could be applied to martial arts like judo where repetition is at the core of a training session.
As an asian person with an american-educated dad, I used to hate the rote-repetition method to learning and training that's often used in asia. I was able to excel on many things, like football and studying the sciences, but I think i could have reached higher levels if I wasn't so averse to repetition. There are some things in life that's impossible to understand, at least for me. It helps to simply try it repeatedly until you "get" it, even if it's inexplicable. It's a shortcut and often the only way to keep progressing.
we need a new category for videos like this. "so you can follow this video as you read through the book if you want to" its not quite a summary, or review, more like an interpretation? idk. just a thought for the trend setters to think about.
Interesting. I watch at x2 speed so get through videos far faster than written text. Even listening to a video normal speed is faster than reading text for me. The script is in the linked sources doc. Not word for word to the video. I could export the transcription and make it a PDF but there would be words that are specific to images shared on screen which would take time I would rather use doing other videos.
@@Danny.Hatcher Actually I checked but missed the source link, thanks. Just a transcript as a PDF would be fine. I don't mind missing things because there are no visuals. Watching videos at double speed would be torture for me. :) Reading is generally faster because of the cognitive load and the difference in reading versus listening speeds. An achievable fast reading speed for most people, with practice, is typically around 400-600 words per minute (wpm). This range allows for faster reading while maintaining good comprehension. Also, you might need to eliminate subvocalisation, as it helps you read faster. Using a pointer or guide (such as following along with a finger or pen) really helps too. It’s possible to read more than 1,000 pages a day using certain methods. There's a channel named Danny Talks Tech, the guy sounds exactly like you. I wanted to ask if you two are the same person. I couldn't tell. No offence, but you humans all look the same. 👽🤷♂️
TL;DW: The whole is greater than the sum. Especially when the sum really doesn't add up to the whole because of hidden variables, hence it is preferable to do the action one seeks to perfect than other more simpler tasks designed to facilitate the acquisition of that skill, furthermore adding variability/noise/dynamic-enviroment/handicaps tot he training dramamtically improves performance. Now how to activate glutes while walking? Let's get some useful practical infrmation here,rather than all this theory stuff. Not that it isn't useful in general, but just not very useful for knowing to move. Some Remarks: 14:00 this is darwinian pixy dust. This explanation is simply unacceptable, How exactly are flocks supposed to alter individual behavior, how is it that this individual now became a part of this hypothetical super-thing? This is magical thinking, a dead end. As for brain training, it is true, but only because of its quantization, if on the other hand it involves large complex tasks (e.g. multiplication without tricks) there is actual significant changes down tot he anatomical level, furthermore, we have actual cases of acquired savant syndrome that go against both explanations. To me it appears for the brain P = NP. That is it, how? Well, that's a different story. 33:00 the explicit instruction group is nonsenseical. They did not learn how to do the action following this 'explicit' method, especially that it's insufficient, omits most of what is actually happening. The only way to actually implement explicit instructions would be to have an animation with their body kinematics being displayed and what the correct movement ought to be. This kind of explicit instruction would result in a much greater improvement than anything implicit. 56:00 there needs to be more discretization regarding which hemisphere does what, it appears that the right is what maybe referred as functional while the left perceptual. For vision I happened across interesting stuff recently eyeport device, works of jacob liberman and more mainstream stuff, Frederick Brock's brock string.
Thank you for watching. Comments are welcomed and encouraged - what do you think?
I heart comments I have seen, and reply to those UA-cam notifies me off.
FEEDBACK:
1:04:47 Citation numbers should be 55 not 4
KEY COMMENTS:
i love it when YT algorithm recomends me randomlly a hour or more long video, on a topic that i'm mindlly interested in by a small channel that i never seen before.
Welcome aboard!
this was life-changing bro
Not enough love for this video!! Fantastic website as well.
Thank you!
somehow the youtube algorithm brought me here and im not even a bit disappointed
Well I will thank the UA-cam algorithm 😁
I read the book already but this video is great as a refresher 😁
Hopefully there are things in here that maybe add to your reading experience 🤷♂️
Thanks! This was an amazing watch. It made me wonder how those ideas could be applied to martial arts like judo where repetition is at the core of a training session.
As an asian person with an american-educated dad, I used to hate the rote-repetition method to learning and training that's often used in asia. I was able to excel on many things, like football and studying the sciences, but I think i could have reached higher levels if I wasn't so averse to repetition.
There are some things in life that's impossible to understand, at least for me. It helps to simply try it repeatedly until you "get" it, even if it's inexplicable. It's a shortcut and often the only way to keep progressing.
This is fantastic!
Can you also do "Learning to Optimize Movement" by Rob Gray?
It is on my list 😁
we need a new category for videos like this.
"so you can follow this video as you read through the book if you want
to"
its not quite a summary, or review, more like an interpretation? idk.
just a thought for the trend setters to think about.
Agreed!
Video essay I what I refer to it as, but it isn't a summary or review...
Many of us don't have time to watch lengthy videos. Could you please publish these in text format on a website?
And if that's easy for you, perhaps add an option to download them in EPUB format, etc.
Interesting. I watch at x2 speed so get through videos far faster than written text. Even listening to a video normal speed is faster than reading text for me.
The script is in the linked sources doc. Not word for word to the video.
I could export the transcription and make it a PDF but there would be words that are specific to images shared on screen which would take time I would rather use doing other videos.
@@Danny.Hatcher Actually I checked but missed the source link, thanks. Just a transcript as a PDF would be fine. I don't mind missing things because there are no visuals.
Watching videos at double speed would be torture for me. :) Reading is generally faster because of the cognitive load and the difference in reading versus listening speeds. An achievable fast reading speed for most people, with practice, is typically around 400-600 words per minute (wpm). This range allows for faster reading while maintaining good comprehension. Also, you might need to eliminate subvocalisation, as it helps you read faster. Using a pointer or guide (such as following along with a finger or pen) really helps too. It’s possible to read more than 1,000 pages a day using certain methods.
There's a channel named Danny Talks Tech, the guy sounds exactly like you. I wanted to ask if you two are the same person. I couldn't tell. No offence, but you humans all look the same. 👽🤷♂️
Or maybe he's your evil twin? Those things happen, right?
@@ordinarryalien UA-cam's auto transcript works well...
TL;DW: The whole is greater than the sum. Especially when the sum really doesn't add up to the whole because of hidden variables, hence it is preferable to do the action one seeks to perfect than other more simpler tasks designed to facilitate the acquisition of that skill, furthermore adding variability/noise/dynamic-enviroment/handicaps tot he training dramamtically improves performance.
Now how to activate glutes while walking? Let's get some useful practical infrmation here,rather than all this theory stuff. Not that it isn't useful in general, but just not very useful for knowing to move.
Some Remarks:
14:00 this is darwinian pixy dust. This explanation is simply unacceptable, How exactly are flocks supposed to alter individual behavior, how is it that this individual now became a part of this hypothetical super-thing? This is magical thinking, a dead end. As for brain training, it is true, but only because of its quantization, if on the other hand it involves large complex tasks (e.g. multiplication without tricks) there is actual significant changes down tot he anatomical level, furthermore, we have actual cases of acquired savant syndrome that go against both explanations. To me it appears for the brain P = NP. That is it, how? Well, that's a different story.
33:00 the explicit instruction group is nonsenseical. They did not learn how to do the action following this 'explicit' method, especially that it's insufficient, omits most of what is actually happening. The only way to actually implement explicit instructions would be to have an animation with their body kinematics being displayed and what the correct movement ought to be. This kind of explicit instruction would result in a much greater improvement than anything implicit.
56:00 there needs to be more discretization regarding which hemisphere does what, it appears that the right is what maybe referred as functional while the left perceptual.
For vision I happened across interesting stuff recently eyeport device, works of jacob liberman and more mainstream stuff, Frederick Brock's brock string.
Great comment, thank you for sharing. 😁