The mistake is not understanding that if you sue for libel, you will be required to disclose all relevant electronic documents. The kicker was that the judge was able to draw an adverse i defence that the documents that were lost or destroyed would have been harmful to Vardy. Once the court thinks you are being less than honest you will likely not prove your case on a balance of probabilities. This pseudo-WAG thought that Vardy was nailing her outfits? She overdressed and came across as spoiled and entitled.
This is not journalism. Keep to the facts.
The mistake is not understanding that if you sue for libel, you will be required to disclose all relevant electronic documents. The kicker was that the judge was able to draw an adverse i defence that the documents that were lost or destroyed would have been harmful to Vardy. Once the court thinks you are being less than honest you will likely not prove your case on a balance of probabilities.
This pseudo-WAG thought that Vardy was nailing her outfits? She overdressed and came across as spoiled and entitled.
Sisterhood?? Are you on drugs girl 😂😂😂😂