Professor, when you introduce the definition of inner product around 5:45, I wondered why you wrote it as a linear with respect to second component. By the definition of the inner product, it is a linear with respect to the first component. For the second component, if the field is a real number, this is not a problem, but if the field is a complex number, it will be conjugate.
Hey, first I (hopefully a future physicist) want to say I really love and admire your work! Thank you. Secondly, I'm really curious how you managed to upload videos of the same topics but with a dark background without recording them from scratch.
Im trying to teach myself wuantum mechanics and this tipic is quite relevant.
Indeed! For quantum mechanics you need a good knowledge of Hilbert spaces and operators on them.
Hello Bewwy Cwipke
Professor, when you introduce the definition of inner product around 5:45, I wondered why you wrote it as a linear with respect to second component. By the definition of the inner product, it is a linear with respect to the first component. For the second component, if the field is a real number, this is not a problem, but if the field is a complex number, it will be conjugate.
There are two conventions around how to define the inner product. I chose this one because it has advantages in remembering some formulas.
Amazing:) please keep it up, im doing this course right now, interested to see your teaching in comparison to my professors :)
Thanks :)
This video came at the perfect time, I have this on my linear algebra midterm
Hey, first I (hopefully a future physicist) want to say I really love and admire your work! Thank you. Secondly, I'm really curious how you managed to upload videos of the same topics but with a dark background without recording them from scratch.
Thanks a lot. And thanks for the support. The dark version is just colour swapping.
@@brightsideofmaths color of conjugate.