I got permanently banned from Wikipedia..
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 лис 2019
- I got permanently banned from Wikipedia.. PLEASE DON'T MESS WITH ANY WIKIPEDIA ARTICLES OR I MIGHT GET SHOUTED AT AGAIN
💥 Subscribe bit.ly/2yZIHr0 | 🔔Turn on ALL notifications!🔔
🤣 MY OTHER CHANNEL (𝙎𝙐𝘽𝙎𝘾𝙍𝙄𝘽𝙀) / jacksucksatstuff
🎁 SPONSOR THE CHANNEL ua-cam.com/users/jacksucksatlifejoin
💥 MINECRAFT SERVER play.skycade.net ★ Store store.skycade.net/
💬 TWITTER / jackmasseywelsh
📸 INSTAGRAM / jackmasseywelsh
👕 MERCH jacksucksatlife.shop
😎 SEND MEMES / jacksucksatlife
🤓 HIRE ME www.cameo.com/jacksucksatlife
🎹 Outro Music • Gee - Electroswing Rev...
🎶 Skycade's Discord / discord
💻 Business email: jack @ skycade . net
👍 GET MY RECORDING SET UP & FREE STUFF:
www.amazon.com/shop/jacksucks...
💥 Watch More JackSucksAtLife:
Best Of 2018 bit.ly/2QfeYR0
Popular Uploads bit.ly/2VrkeEI - Розваги
‘It’s a willy’ - Jack Massey Welsh 2019
congraaats the heart
🤧 you deleted my 8=D comment 😂
Wow I-
“ ‘It’s a willy’- Jack Massey Welsh 2019”
-Bob Smiles 2019
Willy Wanka
"its a willy... thank you."
- Jack Massey Welsh 2019
Not gonna lie, I'd pay for a "Not Notable" shirt lmao
Dannielle S. yeah he should milk this situation and become famous enough to be put on the page
Sameeeeeee
@@minikipp8549 He should give shirts to other UA-camrs and have them encourage their audiences to join the campaign. They can't stop us all.
I'm also not notable so its relatable
GIVE US THE SHIRTS JACK!!! it would be the first time I buy something from a youtuber!
Jack: i am a very notable person
Me: yeah it is indeed very notable that you have been banned from practically everything
even ur own server
Transport Gaming that video was a joke
Moatje2005 lmoa
Would like but it's at 699
@@yustinj.3910 you can like now cause it was ruined
Honestly, just cause enough drama around this to get into the news, and then they have to add you! It's the perfect plan!
this video has only been out for 9 minutes but i still find your comment underrated
Gets in bishop aukland Wikipedia for being born there and being the guy to get in the news for spamming bishop aukland Wikipedia
I approve of this
big brain
Yes
Has anyone actually ever heard of the "notable people" on that page
fair enough lmao
Oh yeah you know that one dude that was featured on dr Phil 4 years ago? He deserves a full Wikipedia page! Oh and a UA-cam with 1mil subs? Nah not known enlugh
Notable had nothing to do with popular or famous. There is a test they apply.
Yeah man, but I live there so...
**everyone: nope**
Upcoming next:
Jacksucksatlife: banned from youtube because he is buying too many youtube play buttons
How he gonna post it mate.
Blossom _Da_Cat They never said it had to be posted on UA-cam or by jack
@@tjtjtjtjt this did put "Jacksucksatlife" .....but......
*they...
Niyashi•Edits Well it could be that the "jacksucksatlife" is apart of the title but that’s probably stretching it:
Jacksucksatlife: I got banned on Wikipedia
Me: did you try turning it on and off again
ok boomer
@@dareokoski8158 ok zoomer
@@shussainic_tm LMAO
Dareo Koski lets make this a chain
Ok boomer
Not gonna chain it zoomer
“I wanna see the male genitalia” 8:00
Jack- 2019
im starting to question his gender at this point. idk if he knows what it looks like 🤔
I think their rule against youtubers is BS, surely if a person is known to over a million people across the world that makes them notable
They just hate new media. It’s another example of the establishment abusing their power to remove anything that threatens their position.
@@ryanwalsh5019 For real. I can't count the number of times that I've seen advertisements or "trending" videos that feature some nobody celebrity or musician that I've never heard of. Slightly different situation but same motivation.
DJ Maysonic legitimately the definition of the phrase “Ok boomer”. They just don’t like the idea of the internet actually being able to make people more popular than the local news. So retarded, seems like Wikipedia need a new and less naive admin team
U
DJ Maysonic WP:IMPARTIAL , WP:DISCLAIMER
omg I want "not notable enough for wikipedia" merch
118 likes and no comments???
This Aged Badly...
i would definitely buy the “not notable enough for wikipedia” merch
i would definitely but the “not notable enough for wikipedia” merch
I don't see how you're not notable enough... One of our teachers at school - Will Randall - has his own Wikipedia page.
You see the problem is you've assumed the goal is "truth" or "being correct" or "containing accurate information". It's not.
if he has been in the news, newspapers etc. that is notanle if not then somethng is wrong
it says he may not reach the needed notability on his Wikipedia page
ok
@@natj8675 Damn. You really went all out didn't you
Jack: Gets banned on Wikipedia
Me: you had to make a video about it
Edit: 10 months on I look back at this as my most liked comment
Content boysss
MinecraftMaster there can only be one us, fake Steve
WW3 confirmed
*CoNtEnT-*
its free real estate
That piss off makes me pissed myself at wikipedia mods for thinking its actually the youtubers fault.
WAITWAITWAIT
6:36
THEY DELETED JAIDEN?!
WIKIPEDIA IS TRASH BURN IT
I demand *justice*
Petition to delete Wikipedia
Fr fr jaiden hands down the best animator UA-camr
@Arctic nah odd1sout is the best, but jaiden is second
@@psych0bs798 I say there both equal in quality and comedy, I like Jaiden's animation and stories a bit more but there both equally great
Wikipedia: "youtube celebs are not real celebs"
Me: Ok boomer
oof
gotem
@Maysen Hepi PewDiePie is an exception. He's the most popular UA-camr
They're really not, at least a majority aren't.
TheSkytherMod ok boomer
“Where’s the male genitalia? I wanna see it!”
- JackMasseyWelsh 2019
No one:
Like at all:
Not a single soul:
Jack:
HiPpiTy hOppiTy tHiS iS mY pRop-
sorry, that’s not right
*CoUgH* Wikipedia* *cOuGh*
what the f-
hAhAhA
That didn't age well
“I made a severe and continuous lapse in my judgement” Logan won’t like that one lmao
5:15 "the pages was locked" and points at the lock that indicates a secure connection from the browser xD
"I Am A Very Notable Person"
*Gets Banned From Everything Humanly Possible*
Me: Yeahhhhh Suuure You Are
Juleka writes a comment about notability.
That was unexpected.
Oh Fu- Imma Get Exposed Lol
@@bigballsbee *exposes*
Jack: *adds handsome*
Wikipedia: *Im bout to end this mans whole career*
swap it around "handsome jack" jack was in borderlands who knew!
Hey there Jack! As I'm both a fan of yours and a frequent Wikipedia editor, I felt obligated in a sense to make a "formal" reasoning for why you in particular do not meet the notability guidelines. Please don't hate me; it's just difficult for UA-camrs to meet the general notability guidelines for warranting an article. However, it's not impossible. (As an example, I was the one who accepted the draft article for Keemstar. It can be done.) I hope through this you will be able to see why these policies are as strict as they are. Now, onto the reasoning.
As a general rule of thumb for UA-camrs, 6-7 million subscribers is ideal for having an article. However, there are exceptions for either side. (As an example, Cocomelon Nursery rhymes, the third most subscribed to channel, does not have an article. Channels with low subcounts also have articles, but the reasoning probably extends beyond their UA-cam channel.) Because of the fact that channels with high subcounts may not be covered in reliable, independent sources, we can't rely on "This person has a million subscribers, so they must be notable". I don't believe you have been involved in any published controversy, nor have you been a featured subject of a news article or interview. In fact, a Google Search of your name brings up no reliable sources. Your UA-cam channel is not independent and neither is your shop, so it cannot be verified. Wikipedia, Wikitubia, Reddit, FamousBirthdays, and Urban Dictionary are user generated, so these are not reliable sources either. Because of this, an article created about you would be proposed for deletion for failing the criteria for Verifiability. (See Wikipedia:Verifiability for further information.)
However, let's say that an article is created anyway. Because the article is a biography about you, you are living, and you are a person, that article would be a BLP, or a biography of a living person. For legal / verification reasons, BLPs have much stricter requirements than other articles, say about a chemical compound or a naval ship. (See Wikipedia:BLP for further information.) BLPs can only exist with the proper referencing to reliable, independent sources, which we have established do not currently exist for you. This is because we cannot give anybody to create an article about themselves and provide bogus links to prove their non-existent notability. If the article is improperly referenced, it will be quickly listed at Articles for Deletion (usually). Let's say you were garnering mainstream attention and have be the subject of reliable publications; at this point, we would have a different case on our hands. However, as of this moment, that is not currently the case.
Finally, your ban. I am not an administrator, but because your fanbase followed you to Wikipedia and edited disruptively, it's safer that you are banned so that something to this effect doesn't happen in the future. Thank you for understanding the rationale, and being a good sport about your ban. I hope you understand the reasoning behind it, and thank you for requesting that viewers do not continuously vandalize the site. Even if you aren't technically notable for Wikipedia's standards, I'll still be a fan.
Cheers, ~Utopes
So, UA-cam decided to toss this video in my recommendations for some reason.
And I'm curious what would classify as a reputable source?
For instance would another UA-camr who's been Given the go ahead to have there page and hosts a show that's like a news thing for UA-camrs count?
Given I know he's popped up on Drama alert which is run by Keem for his Breaking UA-cam video.
I'm not sure if that was before or after this video, but would that not make him a little more applicable?
of course it’s jack who got banned from wikipedia.
All i can say is
*No LoNg TeRm DaMaGE*
What film would you love to see made out of clips the film can be up to 16 minutes long so you can choose the title and the length and ill make it 😁
@@djcol68 ???????
@@cavalryow7427 pick a fan film of any choice
"I wanna see the male genitalia" -Jack Massey welsh 2019
Their criteria for youtubers is honestly ridiculous. They don’t even bother telling you the criteria and just tell you not to bother instead. I bet it’s something dumb like whether or not they’ve overheard their kids talk about that person. Strange how a website that was once the forefront of a new way of thinking is rejecting the modern concept of notability. There were seriously people on that rejected list who are more notable than a lot of wiki pages combined will ever be.
Also they themselves state notability rules are for pages/lists and not content, therefore youtubers should be allowed to be on notable residents/alumni lists on Wikipedia. They would have a different criteria. Do you really think that guy with 3 million subscribers isn’t the best thing that came out of your small town in the middle of nowhere Brenda?
do you want me to shout at them, maybe wake them up? :)
😂😂
5:48
“Like news articles”
you’ve been on Drama Alert, that’s enough
Jack: Lets Edit this Wikipedia Page
Wikipedia: No You Will be banned
Jack: Noooooooooo
R.I.P Jacks Wikipedia Edit
2019 - 2019 You Will Be Missed
I love how Wikipedia says that it’s not a place for UA-camrs when UA-camrs literally have articles there
Nowhere does it say it's not a place for UA-camrs.
Articles about UA-camrs can very much be made, as long as they're notable (have reliable secondary sources), and there are no restrictions on UA-camrs editing Wikipedia (as long as they're following all the policies and guidelines)
No one:
Literally no one:
Jack: *changes his wikipedia to “the handsome jack” 😂
No one:
Jack: dOeS aNyOnE kNoW hOw To EdIt It
No one:
Me: I do!
Oh god-
Me: Sees Title
Also Me: Oh No
congrats on getting officially banned from wikipedia, jack. never really heard anyone do that.
I nearly pulled that off just trying to make an article not sound angry. The people who watched that page literally couldn't have any of their decisions challenged and basically insta reverted any edit. I got a threat that they would report me as a troublemaker or some such (this was 3 years ago now I suspect).
@@SgtKOnyx what’s the page
Happens a lot, people are blocked for edit warring, vandalism etc.
congrats on getting officially banned from wikipedia, jack. never really heard anyone do that:
Jacksucksatlife : I made a severe lapse of judgement
- me 2019
I dont know, wikipedia admins sound like boomers that think "Oh YoUTubERS DonT HAve JoBS" or that youtube isnt a job
Yeah, I understand maybe not spamming youtubers on non-related pages, but banning them from creating their own page is pretty dumb.
Kal Then a bunch of you tubers with a thousand subscribers will get articles. People shouldn’t make articles about themselves as it is normally biased. Only youtubers who have the power to influence in real life get articles. EG DanTDM has been on multiple BBC interviews while Jack has been on none.
@@colonelkk Yes, i agree making articles on yourself is pretty bad, but if someone is popular enough to the poinjt that someone that has never even spoken to the youtuber makes an article on the youtuber, i feel like that should be fine
Gael epic channel of awsomness But surely that criteria would mean anyone that I have heard of at least once would get a Wikipedia article even if only 5 people know that person?
@@colonelkk Thats not even close to what i mean, Theres many i mean MANY youtubers out there that even if they havent been on a newspaper,etc still in my opinion deserve a wikipidia article because of there fame on the youtube world, ones that are rather popular and have done alot of stuff, im just saying not all of them deserve one but some do
Can we discuss how in the email from Wikitubia, the guy blew a kazoo at the end for Jack? I love that.
LittleGuardian94 wouldnt be an email to jack without doing so.... *Blows Kazoo*
wikitubia>wikipedia
Always wondered why your accent was so familiar. Great to see a local lad doing so well!
I used to work as a volunteer on wikiHow, a different and more weird website. I can say this much: repeated vandalism on an article is very annoying to rollback, as you have to just repeatedly rollback the edits over and over again while telling the vandaliser a warning (basically to get the crap off of the website but in a nice way). It does get very annoying for us to have to revert the edits over and over. However, the edits can be pretty funny sometimes, and I do have some personal favorites from when I was on the site. :)
As a Wikipedian, I laughed at how you react at all serious editor's actions lol
As a Wikipedian, I laughed at how you react at all serious editor's actions lol
Somebody needs to make a fan fiction called “It’s A Willy Jack!”
Been here since 200k, keep up the stellar content
5:53 you did a voice acting for a game! Does that not count?🤣🤣🤣
I was listening to the song from up and then jack posted this, seems appropriate
Either jack added an extra period... or he forgot a third period in his ellipse
I'd love to see a newcomer scroll through and see this series of youtubers
Love the vids , carry on the good work
Wikipedia: bans him
Everyone hated that
Jack should do the Guinness world record for the longest kazoo chain to become notable enough
Jack should do the Guinness world record for the longest kazoo chain to become notable enough
Hilarious. You were really thorough looking at the guidelines as always. FIVE MIL GUYS LET'S GET THAT WIKI ARTICLE
Dantdm should have his own wiki,he's hosting a movie.
You need to censor the ip addresses 2:30
hi
hi
Hi
hi
Hi
hi
Fun fact: this channel has at least 4 mentions in news articles. Most of them are on opinion articles though, which is an issue as literally anybody can submit an opinion article I believe. As long as he keeps making new videos and growing, he'll get more mentions in articles, and if he gets an article in an actual news vendor strictly about himself, that will help a lot.
Can you do more videos on wikitubia/other fandom wikipedias (such as the Minecraft fandom wikipedia or the Parappa The Rapper fandom wikipedia)?
why did i see this coming?
Jack: I am the great jack Massey Welsh and the wiki shall not ban me
Wiki:JaCk mAsSeY WeLsH YoU aRe pERmAnEnTly bAnNeD
“I made a severe and continuous lapse in judgement.” I’m going to use this.
Howdy, I love what you're doing for the community of Wikipedia and the MC community.
It’ll take awhile to figure out how much you’ve been banned from
Id have looked up the Wiki for that, but.........
Jack: been banned on Wikipedia
Me: U BANNED ME ON SKYBLOCK 🤬
8:06 the one second i was in a jacksucksatlife video. This is the proudest day of my life
i'd be devastated, hope ur okay xx
Wikipedia admins are salty lol, he is famous.
Next video:
I got banned from life
nobody:
Jack starting every video: *Okay*
This is the best apology video ever
Me: *adds one single dot to a wikipedia page*
Wikipedia: *get out just-just GET OUT*
“jack sksksksk at life”
Noo please nooo
I Love how this thumbnail and the last vids thumbnail goes together xD
1 million=Farm life ep 4
2 million=Plays Mario
3 million=brings back cow onesie
4 million=changes UA-cam name to jacksurrrrrrrrcksatleef
5 million=gets back on wikipedia
10 million=well will Jack be alive?
I did the “most famous for the ‘I let - edit my my video’ series”
Now that he has a world record I wonder if he can get on the notable list and get his own page
Not notable enough, still
Now that he has an world record I wonder if he can get on the notable list and get his own page
So according to wikipedia, a guy from Bishop Auckland that invented something is more important than a pretty well known youtuber.
It sounds like they genuinely need to update the terms to be added. People look up things current and new and thats what youtubers are. More people want to know about youtubers than the guy that invented something.
i have a botnet that regularly edits wikipedia. eventually what happened was one of the bots used the computer belonging to a regular editor there and he got banned because the edit was traced to his computer lol. i don't know if he ever got back on, but to this day, they continue to edit the site.
*reads title*
👏WELL DONE👏😂😂
:7-*
Me when reading the title: *Niiiiiiceeeee going, Jack* 🤦🏼♀️😂
Jack: -changes Wikipedia-
Wikipedia: You’re Cancelled. 😏
1:06" and I dont expect to be forgiven"
the “notability” guidelines for youtubers seems extremely patronizing and extremely ironic coming from a website that struggles with being taken as a serious informational site
4:40 OMG I PUT THAT JACK LMAO YES
this reminds me of the "Shane and Ryan's bridge" thing on Wikipedia, except that was on a much greater scale
Lol love the vids bro, they are always funny too watch o nthis channel and on your other channel.
Petition for Jack to change his username to : JackNoLongerSucksAtLife
Bald people be like:
Hippity hoppity my head has no toppity
TBFred how is this relevant to the video? Or funny in any way?
Charlieegan6 I know
TBFred still haven’t answered the question
As someone who did some work on Wikipedia it seems like Wikipedia have gone to far. Should of locked the page earlier instead of just letting it go on.
A famous entertainer is a notable person. Refusing to officially ad him is hypocrisy and unjustified prejudice
Lol
Yea lol
Pretty lol
@Spectrum Z omg yes so lol
Loooool
Yea so lool
hi random person who is scrolling through the comments
have a nice day
Thanks
Big boss jack back at it again with the getting banned from stuff pog
Don't worry, we care about you
So I get that the Bishop Aukland page was vandalized and that some people took this way too far, but the Wikipedia mod/mods were highly unprofessional. There is no reason to get as mad as the one mod did, especially just for Jacks article.
Love my new poster Jack! Thanks!!
I saw you banned a TON of people on skycade bans expecting a hackers trolling soon
Oh my god Jack. You've gone n done it again
Jack: stay away from wikipedia
Me: but i need some knowledge since i am not big brain
can you do a video about looking at what country watches your videos the most or the least
I worked really hard on a wikipedia page for a web series once and it took me months to get it published by the approval system. Those volunteers are hardcore there
fr, they act like it's some 9-5 job.
I worked really hard on a wikipedia page for a web series once and it took me months to get it published by the approval system. Those volunteers are hardcore there
Wiki mods tend to get butthurt pretty quickly, and are known to power trip pretty hard. The Ajit Pai incident was a great example. Such is life.
The vandalism was bad, definitely, but it's hardly Jack's fault for that. :/
Also, umm... There are Wikipedia's for each of Genghis Khan's first dozen wives (individuals that I SERIOUSLY doubt pop up for any but the most extreme of limited cases), so I mean I think the mods are just too slow to accept online personalities as important people.