Rotax Aircraft Engines - Engine Week 2022

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 гру 2022
  • Tips and facts about owning and operating the Rotax Aircraft Engines
    👇🏼 👇🏼👇🏼 Click "SHOW MORE" to see the LINKS Below! ✈️✈️✈️
    www.flyrotax.com/
    flysmla.com/
    Please follow us on Facebook where we post nearly daily:
    / experimentalaircraftch...
    Check out our NEW WEBSITE!
    experimentalaircraftchannel.com/
    #experimentalaircraft #experimentalaircraftchannel #engines
    ***SUBSCRIBE Right Now to Experimental Aircraft Channel
    (It's FREE) and get exclusive offers below!
    Our "Sister" Podcast Channel on UA-cam: / @eacaviationpodcast9668
    Please visit our Channel Sponsors here:
    *Dynon Avionics (Avionics for Experimental, Certified and Light Sport Aircraft)
    dynonavionics.com/
    *Airtech Coatings ("We Make Paint Fly" - Fabric and Paint Manufacturer)
    airtechcoatings.com/
    *The Aviators Clinic ("Flight Medicine for Pilots by Pilots" - AME for medicals + more)
    www.aviatorsclinic.com/
    *Clemens Insurance Agency (Aircraft insurance and other insurance products)
    www.clemensinsurance.net/
    Foxtrot 95 Calhoun County Airport (Identifier F95) Panhandle of Florida
    www.flyfoxtrot95.com/
    Please visit our Affiliates Here:
    **Flying Eyes Optics - 10% Off Use Code: EXPERIMENTAL
    flyingeyesoptics.com/eyewear/...
    **Griplock Ties (Speaks for itself!) Free Shipping with Code: EXPERIMENTAL
    griplockties.com/?fill_cart=1...
    (Get FREE Shipping *USA ONLY*)
    Join the NEW Facebook GROUP where we encourage "Say it With VIDEO" build updates on YOUR current project:
    / experimentalaircraftch...
    And we are on INSTAGRAM too!
    / experimentalaircraftch...
    WE HAVE A PODCAST! Audio only can be found on iTune, GooglePlay and Podbean. Fill VideoPodcast (V-Podcast) on UA-cam by searching "EAC Aviation Podcast" or click: / @eacaviationpodcast9668
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 42

  • @mjobmi
    @mjobmi Рік тому +5

    After watching too many UA-cam videos it is refreshing to see(and hear) real knowledgeable people give us great advice on how to maintain the Rotax engines. Thanks for sharing this information. They clearly have a passion for this line of work. From the stories sounds like they are very giving of their expertise over the phone as well. I don’t own a Rotax but if I did I’d be very comfortable with these guys working on it for me.
    Great job on “Engine Week” Bryan I watched last years and 2022 is even better keep up the great work!
    For all have a great 2023! Please be good to your fellow humans.

  • @brentporter8821
    @brentporter8821 Рік тому +4

    Hey Brian, I like these technical videos on how engines work and are repaired or rebuilt. Most of us airplane junkies can recite the specs on most engines and while it does feed the monster to watch a rep talk about their engines, it’s mostly talking points that can be found on the manufacturers website. However, learning about spags, slipper clutches, and carb balancing is not something you see too often. One of my favorite videos you’ve done is of the engine rebuilds at Airworks. Thank! Keep up the good work.

  • @IggyDalrymple
    @IggyDalrymple Рік тому +1

    Sixty years ago we called it syncing the props. When the two engines are in sync there is a steady humming sound. We would sync the props while airborne. We had separate throttles for each engine and separate prop pitch controls. My experience was with a twin Beechcraft called the SNB (Secret Navy Bomber)[joke].

  • @flysport_tedder
    @flysport_tedder Рік тому +3

    this is a fantastic video on Rotaxes. I mean, there's so much information packed into it.

  • @markwebb8013
    @markwebb8013 Рік тому +1

    Great video Brian thanks for the information 👍.

  • @patway4683
    @patway4683 Рік тому +1

    Great videos!

  • @SmittySmithsonite
    @SmittySmithsonite Рік тому +3

    .001" piston-to-cylinder clearance?!? WOW!! As a mechanic of many years, that is IMPRESSIVE, and the first I've ever heard of a clearance that tight! I love these engines since they're very similar to the Japanese on and off-road engines I cut my mechanical teeth on as a kid. I've worked on 2-stroke 582's in powered parachutes a few times - very well built engines. Was always a big fan of Bombardier snowmobiles (Ski-Doo) way back in the day as well. Can't go wrong with those engines. GREAT video series, Bryan! I've got some catching up to do!

    • @ExperimentalAircraftChannel
      @ExperimentalAircraftChannel  Рік тому +1

      Thanks for stopping by! It's been a fun week learning about ENGINES! :-)

    • @piercer2
      @piercer2 Рік тому

      Stock Ford 302 pushrod V8 engines can have PTW clearance as tight as half a thou from factory. I ran 1.5 on my forged 4032 Mahle pistons, as I rev to 5k only on my 331

    • @SmittySmithsonite
      @SmittySmithsonite Рік тому

      @@piercer2 You sure about that? I've never heard of ANY manufacturer or ANY engine running that tight. 0018" -.0025" is commonplace from small engines / motorcycles / OPE, to cars / trucks.

  • @Wayneshelp
    @Wayneshelp Рік тому

    Great folks, Ronnie and Morris! Trustable source for your ROTAX service!

  • @Todd936
    @Todd936 Рік тому

    Respect 🫡
    Thanks for this man.

  • @RedNeckWelding
    @RedNeckWelding Рік тому +1

    This was one of the most informative rotax videos I’ve seen. Thanks again Bryan for the great videos you produce, Happy New Year to you and your family.

  • @markthibault8579
    @markthibault8579 Рік тому

    Great information. It was interesting to learn more about the carb syncronisation process.

  • @jeremykemp3782
    @jeremykemp3782 9 місяців тому

    I wonder what these boys think of the edge performance lads? They would make a great team, that's a sure thing.

  • @vitordelima
    @vitordelima Рік тому +1

    Avweb had a video about engines that got cancelled, Rotax tried to sell a six cylinder gasoline aviation engine (a market with zero competition) once and it mysteriously vanished.

  • @deeremeyer1749
    @deeremeyer1749 Місяць тому

    Fully certified to "tear apart" and then "service out" your aircraft engine. Is that the same thing as "overhaul"? And what airplanes had Rotax engines 28 years ago? Ultralights?

  • @1shARyn3
    @1shARyn3 Рік тому +2

    Hint, Hint: The cap on the oil reservoir really is NOT that hard to remove :-D

  • @philipritson8821
    @philipritson8821 4 місяці тому

    What about the 80 horsepower 912UL?

  • @Factory400
    @Factory400 Рік тому

    The moral of the story..... get the EFI models. 😍

  • @Bar-barfishingofisial
    @Bar-barfishingofisial 7 місяців тому

    Where is can buy engine rotax

  • @darrenicon5172
    @darrenicon5172 Місяць тому

    I can only find MAX HP where can i find RPM to HP graphs for 912 915 916 like HP at 4000rpm 4500rpm etc. 🤷‍♂️

  • @roginutah
    @roginutah 9 місяців тому

    Constant depression carbs?

  • @deeremeyer1749
    @deeremeyer1749 Місяць тому

    So a "routine" engine oil level check involves "burping" and "operating" the engine AFTER "pulling the dipstick" to CHECK "how much oil" is in the "oil tank" before hand cranking the engine WHILE listening for "gurgling" - how much gurgling or how long to gurgle isn't "specified" - to ensure the engine is "getting oil" and the dry sump system is "primed" and THEN the engine can be."operafed" long enough to completely "burn" the excess engine out of the crankcase and THEN oil level in the oil "tank" can properly be "checked".
    A "dry sump" engine with pressure lube "burns" the excess oil out of the crankcase? So its "total loss"?
    Interesting. Dry sump means "excess oil" in the CRANKCASE "sump" is "scavenged" and returned to the "tank" (typically the "technical term" used by "certified" mechanics is RESERVOIR or SUPPLY) and there is actually LESS oil loss than if a dry-sump "high performance" engine were "wet sump" because "blowby" is reduced along with "windage" and oil "foaming".
    A "vacuum" in the crankcase (relative to intake manifold "vacuum" relative to atmospheric pressure caused by air cleaner and carb restriction) also reduces "blowby".
    So I'm having trouble buying your "expertise" or at least Rotax "engineering".

  • @eastindiaV
    @eastindiaV Рік тому +1

    Looks like a WW1 Fokker engine

  • @Agislife1960
    @Agislife1960 Рік тому

    40K for 140hp, I'll bet you could develop a turbo charged fuel injected Lycoming 0-320 engine for less than that and you'd have over 160hp at altitude

  • @cluelessbeekeeping1322
    @cluelessbeekeeping1322 Рік тому +1

    1st?

    • @parkeranderson5074
      @parkeranderson5074 Рік тому

      No, I didn’t make it on time.

    • @cluelessbeekeeping1322
      @cluelessbeekeeping1322 Рік тому

      @@parkeranderson5074 Then that would bee a 'yes.'
      & that alone makes me better than everyone on this thread, YO!

  • @henrihunter8030
    @henrihunter8030 Рік тому

    Guy sounds a lot like dr phil

  • @parulparul6436
    @parulparul6436 Рік тому

    how many price engine

  • @LTVoyager
    @LTVoyager Рік тому +1

    A computer controlled engine should never kickback. Sounds like Rotax needs to get a car company to help them program their ECU. 😁

    • @rjbishop12
      @rjbishop12 Рік тому +1

      The 912ULS is not computer controlled. CDI ignition, carbureted. The kickback is aggravated by the gearbox and a light prop.

    • @philipritson8821
      @philipritson8821 4 місяці тому

      The 914 too?

  • @tonylam9548
    @tonylam9548 Рік тому +1

    To me, Rotax came as a disappointment. Although they are the weight champion, they did not do the industry any favors in cost, Rotax are basically as expensive as the classical aircraft engines. If you want a more advanced engine, such as Suzuki, Honda etc , you can get one for about 1/2 the cost for the same HP. I guess it is a huge company, with lots of overheads and share holders to pay off. Some of the models of the engines are basically obsolete when first introduced, they came with carburators when automotive had injection more than a decade ago. Rotax is also snail slow in expanding the HP range. It is only up to 145 HP now. It is normal for a large company to be less agile and smaller companies get the jump on them, such as Edge Performance. GM too had that problem and lots of performance hardware were developed by others. But when you are a small company in the south Pacific and someone else get the jump improving your engine, it is not good optics for your R and D dept.

    • @tonyforrester9570
      @tonyforrester9570 Рік тому

      That's why I fly behind a Jabiru engine, and despite the static about their old engines, they have been good to me for nearly 15 years.

  • @ele4853
    @ele4853 11 місяців тому

    Pricey Garbage