I'm not quite convinced yet. You took the limit as h approached zero, however we were treating the entire term x+h as the x in the limit example. If we are not taking the limit as x+h goes to zero, I'm not sure how this works.
I think you did not prove the standard result. The standard result you have stated is just the other form of the limit you want to prove. So you use the formula itself to prove itself. Can I have the proof of the standard result of limit you have stated????
The limit you say is given by m/na^(m-n) is trivially wrong. as x tends to 0 you just end up with a^m/a^n. The limit is a^(m-n). In addition to that, even if it was correct you do not apply it correctly as x+h tends to x as h tends to 0, not to 0.
I am student of class 12th of Jawahar Navodaya Vidayalaya from India.Now a days i am preapering for IIT-JEE. I like your teaching style too much which is very useful for poor students who are unable to take coaching for making his future.but in your videos i can't watch in a successive manner. At last i & my friend requested you to please please please edit & rename your video title serially like Calculas part-01 Calculas part-02 Calculas part-03 ................ so on.
Oh my god u proved it damn easy sir
Well.... nobody did like this tnx
ua-cam.com/video/CXYDJeJC1Pw/v-deo.html
I'm not quite convinced yet. You took the limit as h approached zero, however we were treating the entire term x+h as the x in the limit example. If we are not taking the limit as x+h goes to zero, I'm not sure how this works.
At 2:10 can someone link a video where he proved that limit?
thx^^
this came out in my test and Im scared it come out again~
u solve all my question^^
I think you did not prove the standard result. The standard result you have stated is just the other form of the limit you want to prove. So you use the formula itself to prove itself. Can I have the proof of the standard result of limit you have stated????
The limit you say is given by m/na^(m-n) is trivially wrong. as x tends to 0 you just end up with a^m/a^n. The limit is a^(m-n). In addition to that, even if it was correct you do not apply it correctly as x+h tends to x as h tends to 0, not to 0.
How do you proof that limit?
I've never encountered that limit formula..
I am student of class 12th of Jawahar Navodaya Vidayalaya from India.Now a days i am preapering for IIT-JEE.
I like your teaching style too much which is very useful for poor students who are unable to take coaching for making his future.but in your videos i can't watch in a successive manner.
At last i & my friend requested you to please please please edit & rename your video title serially like
Calculas part-01
Calculas part-02
Calculas part-03
................ so on.
I understand thank you!!!
deribidib
What is with your accent sir?
Nor from India nor from West!!!
And stop saying right every time
Hey, can i say i love you?