I record through my Apollo with light compression. Then when I’m mixing the vocals, I use the virtual mix rack as a plug-in. I normally use the sony c800 emulators.
If you’re wanting the vibe from the Avalon while tracking, just put the preamp in the slot UNDERNEATH the Unison slot and set console to monitor only. I’ve heard about people tracking just fine with the Unison and the modeling afterwards with plenty of success. Good vid, though, dude. I was conflicted about this same thing.
Exactly... Only thing is that your suggested method is no longer utilizing the unison preamp technology. When you use the preamp as an insert you will notice that it used significantly less dsp power. as an insert underneath the unison slot, and the sonic impact on the signal is different as well. You will definitely still get decent results, but most people are paying for the unison preamps to take advantage of the unison modeling technology.
@@Callthatreverendmusic if that’s the case, you could always use a line out from the Apollo right back into the unison preamp just like you would with outboard gear. Again, that’s just for tracking vibe.
That is what I was wondering now that the offer is back on! I love apollo technology to record already printed signals and save on DSPs so the Slate one might be fun as you said only if out first in the chain without any unison technology plug activated on insert in the uad console. Great video and great analysis
Thank you sir , you have helped me tremendously as I have the Slate mic and Apollo as well and have been having issues as to how I would record my vocals. Thank you again for giving me options. 👍🏾
I don’t understand because on my VMS one, I use the emulation also use the unison preamp, and when it’s in the daw, I can switch through microphones and change a different sound for each microphone, or I can do it your way, use as many plugins as I want and not run out of DSP because I have a UAD2 8 core satellite
I was wondering, I got the Slate digital mic but I also have the Scarlett 2i2 interface, I really want to use the virtual microphones is it still possible?
Rev. Great Video. I got a question. I have the Apollo Twin MKII with the Slate VMS ML-1 mic. I'm new the that Slate ML-1 is there a way to track live? Hear how it's going to sound of the emulator before I start recording. 7:28 example have the Trimmer Meter moving while changing to different mics to hear the sound.
If you have the VMS emulation in your inserts and you are monitoring from the DAW then you will be able to hear. You can also put the Apollo emulations in your inserts as well... I think that is what you are asking...hopefully I'm right, but if I'm not understanding the question, let me know. We'll figure it out together.
@@Callthatreverendmusic I got it to work. Here Is what I did. I wanted to be able to test the Sounds before I recorded no afterward. In the Customize Display Bar Check Software & Audio Monitoring Turn on the Software Monitoring (Green Button on the bar) I know you know this lol Press the Record & Input monitoring button (R/I) Then you can test it before you record it.
@@Callthatreverendmusic Now I'm trying to figure out the next part which is what you did. using the console with this mic and the UAD Plugins while still being able to test before I record.
Thumbs up for your clear honest opinions. As has been mentioned by other comments cool looking studio :) Ive been researching this and opinion seems to be that the apollo interfaces have a clean sound . It was mentioned while i was researching this that the Apollo duo should be able to hit 99.9% mic emulation if used directly in the signal path. I was wondering though whats the difference with the VMS-One pre amp? is it designed in some way to enhance the mic emulation or just basically a good pre amp? Do you agree with the 99.9%? I havent found any comparison videos to check it out. Thanks.
Nice question! I’m waiting for the ML1 to go on sale but I was also looking to see if there’s an advantage to the Slate VMS One over the Apollo twin MK2 (or one of the Apollo interfaces). I know there’s an entire ecosystem around Slate so do you lose out on any of that if I combined Apollo + ML1 (seems to work for Reverend)
Apollo is a clean mic pre. It is no different then the Slate VM-1 preamp. You record with the apollo, and up the mic pre and emu post recording. Monitor it with the slate plugins on the return track.
How do you feel about this microphone for voiceover work? if I wanted a crispier/brighter microphone and select the c800 option or go for something a little darker and choose the 47 emulation
@@Callthatreverendmusic just like send it out to the Apollo again and re-record it. Just like all guitars are reamped in modern rock music. Might need a reamp box. But never tried it before. So I don’t know if it works or it’s beneficial…
@@Callthatreverendmusic DOPE! Thanks! I went thru both but may have to eliminate the Slate Pre…can you shoot me an image or send the preset of the AVALON settings? Since you already have it setup right would be GREAT!
thats what i was wondering too, but i see dude never even replied back. i have it turned down and monitoring thru the daw, but it sounds like shit..distorted
Yes indeed. That’s a great interface. I don’t think you should be concerned. Furthermore, I think slate is aware that their preamp is the weak link in the vms system. That is why they choose to do so much more promo on the mic.
I have a budget of £1,000 for a new mic what would you recommend if you could choose any for that price? I will be using it for singing. Just want to get the best option for that price. Looking for advice!
I would want to know what else is in your chain. What preamp are you using, what interface are you using. Because if those aren't right, we might want to split up that investment.
I love the TLM103. I would tell you to get both lol. But if you have to choose, get the slate. Reason? You are practically getting several mics for the price of one. If you record different voices/instruments, you will appreciate versatility of the Slate
@@Callthatreverendmusic Thank you! I only record my voice. Do you think that there is a better option at 1000 dollars?. And if I choose the TLM 103, do you think that I need a better interface for it to sound as it should sound or it's the Focusrite 2i2 enough?
Hey bro.... The best Mic, always has to do with your situation, the voice of the person being recorded or the instrument, sometimes It's how well the mic pairs with other hardware in your chain. However, I will tell you that this is definitely in my opinion the most versatile Mic in the 500's / $600 range. I would tell you that it is the most versatile mic under $1,000. And just remember if you're considering purchasing it now, that normally it sells for $800. This $500 price is a sale that they usually only run once or twice a year. Lastly, it's versatility does not sacrifice quality. So, without knowing your specific situation, I would say The ML 1 Is the safest mic You can purchase with $500, and it's the one most likely to have the ability to give you the results you are looking for.
@@Callthatreverendmusic thanks man yea ive seen a lot of reviews and seems to be a good choice for the price i just sold a AT3035 im trying to do a upgrade around 500 . and the apollo not sure if the solo or the twin duo for more future proof
I got the solo and within a week wished I got a twin. Once you start using the UAD plugins you'll want them on every channel and the solo doesn't have enough processing power
@@Callthatreverendmusic yea thats true well im planning to use only the free pligins i wanted autotune but is no longer free when u buy the apollo :( i still can use it on my daw. i just dont know how much latency i will get. i think the new solo can handle at least 3 plugins? pre amp compressor and eq ? i do only one track at the time
You honestly don't have to do all of that since studio one allows you to record plugins on input, you can literally keep uad setup and still utilize the slate mics on input in studio one
@@Callthatreverendmusic It could still work if you add the avalon preamp on the Record In (Input) track and not an insert and it would be printed in order?
The yellow tracks at 4:00 all have the same plugins from what it looks like. Couldnt those all be routed to the same bus with those plugins to save cpu? Legit question not tryna come off the wrong way btw
No offense taken, I just didn’t know what you were referring to. The tracks in yellow are on a vox bus.. but they do have some slight differences in the plugins on that chain. The 4 verse vox tracks include background and ad libs with different settings than the lead.
I doubt it. Spark does not include all of their plug-ins. But you gave me a great idea. I’ll do a video where we compare the Avalon plug-in as an insert versus as a Unison preamp.
@@Callthatreverendmusic right. Because now we don’t need to use the Apollo interface to use uad plug ins. I’m sure eventually the rest will become available. I just Bought a new interface I’m a bit annoyed but this is still new.
I record through my Apollo with light compression. Then when I’m mixing the vocals, I use the virtual mix rack as a plug-in. I normally use the sony c800 emulators.
I actually use the ml1 into my hardware 1073 into bluey 1176 to la 2a..while tracking..i mainly use the emulations if given a session i didnt track!
If you’re wanting the vibe from the Avalon while tracking, just put the preamp in the slot UNDERNEATH the Unison slot and set console to monitor only.
I’ve heard about people tracking just fine with the Unison and the modeling afterwards with plenty of success.
Good vid, though, dude. I was conflicted about this same thing.
Exactly... Only thing is that your suggested method is no longer utilizing the unison preamp technology. When you use the preamp as an insert you will notice that it used significantly less dsp power. as an insert underneath the unison slot, and the sonic impact on the signal is different as well. You will definitely still get decent results, but most people are paying for the unison preamps to take advantage of the unison modeling technology.
@@Callthatreverendmusic if that’s the case, you could always use a line out from the Apollo right back into the unison preamp just like you would with outboard gear.
Again, that’s just for tracking vibe.
Appreciate your Video and you getting back to me! Thank You
I'm glad to help. Thanks for watching bro!
That is what I was wondering now that the offer is back on! I love apollo technology to record already printed signals and save on DSPs so the Slate one might be fun as you said only if out first in the chain without any unison technology plug activated on insert in the uad console. Great video and great analysis
Respect King!!
Thank you sir , you have helped me tremendously as I have the Slate mic and Apollo as well and have been having issues as to how I would record my vocals. Thank you again for giving me options. 👍🏾
Thanks for watching! I'm so glad I was able to help. 💯💯
is the ml1 compatible with the focusrite solo?
@@lazyg4836 yes it is.
Thank u for this video !
I don’t understand because on my VMS one, I use the emulation also use the unison preamp, and when it’s in the daw, I can switch through microphones and change a different sound for each microphone, or I can do it your way, use as many plugins as I want and not run out of DSP because I have a UAD2 8 core satellite
Great video!!! I have both and you are right best of both worlds!! salute to you brother!! you just made another subscriber!!
Thanks for watching fam!
I was wondering, I got the Slate digital mic but I also have the Scarlett 2i2 interface, I really want to use the virtual microphones is it still possible?
Absolutely.
Great content!
Rev. Great Video. I got a question. I have the Apollo Twin MKII with the Slate VMS ML-1 mic. I'm new the that Slate ML-1 is there a way to track live? Hear how it's going to sound of the emulator before I start recording. 7:28 example have the Trimmer Meter moving while changing to different mics to hear the sound.
If you have the VMS emulation in your inserts and you are monitoring from the DAW then you will be able to hear. You can also put the Apollo emulations in your inserts as well... I think that is what you are asking...hopefully I'm right, but if I'm not understanding the question, let me know. We'll figure it out together.
@@Callthatreverendmusic I got it to work. Here Is what I did. I wanted to be able to test the Sounds before I recorded no afterward. In the
Customize Display Bar
Check Software & Audio Monitoring
Turn on the Software Monitoring (Green Button on the bar) I know you know this lol
Press the Record & Input monitoring button (R/I)
Then you can test it before you record it.
@@Callthatreverendmusic Now I'm trying to figure out the next part which is what you did. using the console with this mic and the UAD Plugins while still being able to test before I record.
please advise which one is better Slate ML-1 or Sony C-80
Thumbs up for your clear honest opinions. As has been mentioned by other comments cool looking studio :) Ive been researching this and opinion seems to be that the apollo interfaces have a clean sound . It was mentioned while i was researching this that the Apollo duo should be able to hit 99.9% mic emulation if used directly in the signal path. I was wondering though whats the difference with the VMS-One pre amp? is it designed in some way to enhance the mic emulation or just basically a good pre amp? Do you agree with the 99.9%? I havent found any comparison videos to check it out. Thanks.
Nice question! I’m waiting for the ML1 to go on sale but I was also looking to see if there’s an advantage to the Slate VMS One over the Apollo twin MK2 (or one of the Apollo interfaces). I know there’s an entire ecosystem around Slate so do you lose out on any of that if I combined Apollo + ML1 (seems to work for Reverend)
Great video, but I think it's just convinced me to snag an SM7B instead. Love your studio space. Its dope
Thanks bro... I'm glad to help any way I can. 😎
Apollo is a clean mic pre. It is no different then the Slate VM-1 preamp. You record with the apollo, and up the mic pre and emu post recording. Monitor it with the slate plugins on the return track.
Do you use the vms one preamp bro?
Short answer, yes you can use the Unison Emulation. I am sure the Slate’s good. I think the UA Sphere is better, if you can afford it.
Still using the Slate mic? Not sure if should keep it with the VMS One. Still in it's box. Zzounds told me the VMS is discontinued. Thanks.
Still use it every day.
You should be able to put the Avalon on the input fx
You can, but not using the unison preamp feature. There is a sonic difference between the Avalon as an insert effect vs in unison preamp mode.
What do you use on the console as a gate plugin?
I don't use a gate on the UA console. I'm most likely to use waves RVOX as the gate in my inserts after recording.
How do you feel about this microphone for voiceover work? if I wanted a crispier/brighter microphone and select the c800 option or go for something a little darker and choose the 47 emulation
So what about Using the ML-1 Emulations as normal and then "reamp" the tracks through the Unison Preamps?
How?
@@Callthatreverendmusic just like send it out to the Apollo again and re-record it. Just like all guitars are reamped in modern rock music.
Might need a reamp box. But never tried it before. So I don’t know if it works or it’s beneficial…
Is the apollo pre amp better than the slate pre amp??
From what I’ve heard the slate pre amp just makes it a flatter signal coming in so the emulations can shape it after the fact
So what are your settings for the AVALON sound YOURE getting? Are you using the SLATE pre-amp into Apollo or straight into the Apollo?
Straight to the Apollo. I use the avalon as the unison preamp.
@@Callthatreverendmusic DOPE! Thanks! I went thru both but may have to eliminate the Slate Pre…can you shoot me an image or send the preset of the AVALON settings? Since you already have it setup right would be GREAT!
so if i’m recording into the mic emulation should i turn of the pre amp button on my apollo and then add a amp emulation after the mic one
thats what i was wondering too, but i see dude never even replied back. i have it turned down and monitoring thru the daw, but it sounds like shit..distorted
You don't use the slate digital pre amp?;
I don’t
@@Callthatreverendmusic okay. Been debating on it. Just bought the mic after seeing your video. Then i saw the pre amp and im unsure bout it
What preamp do you have right now?
@@Callthatreverendmusic I'm using the RME Babyface Pro interface. Ran me about 800 not sure if your familiar
Yes indeed. That’s a great interface. I don’t think you should be concerned. Furthermore, I think slate is aware that their preamp is the weak link in the vms system. That is why they choose to do so much more promo on the mic.
I have a budget of £1,000 for a new mic what would you recommend if you could choose any for that price? I will be using it for singing. Just want to get the best option for that price. Looking for advice!
I would want to know what else is in your chain. What preamp are you using, what interface are you using. Because if those aren't right, we might want to split up that investment.
great video, subbed :D
Just run vocals in a different project? with accord, fix em, and just put the vocals in the track :D less plugins useD?
Slate VMS or Neumann TLM 103 (keep in mind that I'll use the TLM 103 with a Focusrite 2i2) ?
I love the TLM103. I would tell you to get both lol. But if you have to choose, get the slate. Reason? You are practically getting several mics for the price of one. If you record different voices/instruments, you will appreciate versatility of the Slate
@@Callthatreverendmusic Thank you! I only record my voice. Do you think that there is a better option at 1000 dollars?. And if I choose the TLM 103, do you think that I need a better interface for it to sound as it should sound or it's the Focusrite 2i2 enough?
@@mikemiller9533 you can get the Slate mic alone for around $500 and use a clean preamp you already have.
hey do you think the slate ML-1 is the best on the 600 -500 dollar range?
Hey bro.... The best Mic, always has to do with your situation, the voice of the person being recorded or the instrument, sometimes It's how well the mic pairs with other hardware in your chain. However, I will tell you that this is definitely in my opinion the most versatile Mic in the 500's / $600 range. I would tell you that it is the most versatile mic under $1,000. And just remember if you're considering purchasing it now, that normally it sells for $800. This $500 price is a sale that they usually only run once or twice a year. Lastly, it's versatility does not sacrifice quality. So, without knowing your specific situation, I would say The ML 1 Is the safest mic You can purchase with $500, and it's the one most likely to have the ability to give you the results you are looking for.
Call That Reverend do u use the vms preamp. I’m thinking about getting the mic but no sure if I should get it with thier preamp or the Apollo twin?
@@Callthatreverendmusic thanks man yea ive seen a lot of reviews and seems to be a good choice for the price i just sold a AT3035 im trying to do a upgrade around 500 . and the apollo not sure if the solo or the twin duo for more future proof
I got the solo and within a week wished I got a twin. Once you start using the UAD plugins you'll want them on every channel and the solo doesn't have enough processing power
@@Callthatreverendmusic yea thats true well im planning to use only the free pligins i wanted autotune but is no longer free when u buy the apollo :( i still can use it on my daw. i just dont know how much latency i will get. i think the new solo can handle at least 3 plugins? pre amp compressor and eq ? i do only one track at the time
Am i need preamp for this microphone i have apollo twin
No. The Apollo will serve as you preamp
@@Callthatreverendmusic is it better than lewitt 441 flex ?
You honestly don't have to do all of that since studio one allows you to record plugins on input, you can literally keep uad setup and still utilize the slate mics on input in studio one
You can, but the chain would still be illogical. Unison preamp would still come before the mic emulation.
@@Callthatreverendmusic It could still work if you add the avalon preamp on the Record In (Input) track and not an insert and it would be printed in order?
Why are you not using a bus track?
For?
The yellow tracks at 4:00 all have the same plugins from what it looks like. Couldnt those all be routed to the same bus with those plugins to save cpu? Legit question not tryna come off the wrong way btw
No offense taken, I just didn’t know what you were referring to. The tracks in yellow are on a vox bus.. but they do have some slight differences in the plugins on that chain. The 4 verse vox tracks include background and ad libs with different settings than the lead.
Hi bro make video from the avalon 737 with the slate mic nobody have videos 🔥🔥
Bet
Slate Digital ML 1 VMS + Apollo Twin Duo
hey , the foucsright 2i2 can power the slate ml1 mic ?
Yes
UA just went native. Makes me feel like that unison vibe was a scam!
I doubt it. Spark does not include all of their plug-ins. But you gave me a great idea. I’ll do a video where we compare the Avalon plug-in as an insert versus as a Unison preamp.
@@Callthatreverendmusic right. Because now we don’t need to use the Apollo interface to use uad plug ins. I’m sure eventually the rest will become available. I just Bought a new interface I’m a bit annoyed but this is still new.
Trash!! absolutely no need to get a emulation mic. You should use the emulations then create groups busses in your DAW, then use the Avalon there.
We were discussing two different types of emulations, which ones are you referring to. Break down the chain.