In my opinion, math was discovered but the terminology we use to describe it was created. I completely agree with your views on that. 1+1 will always equal 2. 2+2 will always equal 4, so on and so forth. Those are always going to be universal constants - however the terminology we use to describe these constants was an invention of the human mind.
It's obvious that math can be absurd due to projections of objects having uncapped complexity. You can define something and let n->infinity and computing something specific of that space gives you something that stays consistent but tells you nothing actually useful about the object.
bro why is this ginger kinda fine
In my opinion, math was discovered but the terminology we use to describe it was created. I completely agree with your views on that. 1+1 will always equal 2. 2+2 will always equal 4, so on and so forth. Those are always going to be universal constants - however the terminology we use to describe these constants was an invention of the human mind.
It's obvious that math can be absurd due to projections of objects having uncapped complexity. You can define something and let n->infinity and computing something specific of that space gives you something that stays consistent but tells you nothing actually useful about the object.