The United States Just Created The FIRST EVER Invincible Fighter Jet!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 84

  • @ultimatediscovery
    @ultimatediscovery  5 місяців тому +24

    Thanks for visiting The Ultimate Discovery Channel! I hope you enjoy the watch! 😍

  • @Matuse
    @Matuse 5 місяців тому +7

    The SR-71 served with the United States Air Force and the USAF...we're just going to pretend that those are different organizations, are we?

  • @rockyg147
    @rockyg147 Місяць тому +1

    When one your there fuses go wrong the plane drops, these planes you discussed have been stopped.

  • @aruserios7632
    @aruserios7632 5 місяців тому +18

    The FIRST EVER Invincible Fighter Jet!? From now on, whenever I see the channel name The Ultimate Discovery, I am moving on. Jerks.

    • @BertDog1964
      @BertDog1964 2 місяці тому

      Yes, that was very deceiving…
      BUMMER DUD-e

  • @panthapraetorian3974
    @panthapraetorian3974 2 місяці тому +1

    OUTSTANDING! I enjoyed this video very much! Great job! Fast facts without leaving your audience behind. Clearly and meticulously stated statistics. Packed with information about a great many aircraft. You do your research, and you obviously write AND EDIT your script. Bravo!

  • @phillipcole-c7p
    @phillipcole-c7p 4 місяці тому +8

    In nearly two decades of official operation, no F-22 Raptor stealth fighter has ever been shot down before

  • @zed332l
    @zed332l 5 місяців тому +3

    SR 71 best we ever made......acknowledged......

  • @anomaly2990
    @anomaly2990 5 місяців тому +11

    The F22 raptor wasnt even delivered until 2012. A French Rafael did not shoot down an F22. Liar.

    • @1badhaircut
      @1badhaircut 5 місяців тому +3

      No Gen 4 can beat a Gen 5 except in an artificial scenario.

  • @robbier3661
    @robbier3661 2 місяці тому +2

    god dammed!!! this is classified materials ......bravo

  • @vgatorfl92
    @vgatorfl92 Місяць тому +1

    You said the nighthawk was the first plane to have stealth technology however, in the beginning, you said the SR 71 has stealth technology you can’t have it both ways I’m paying attention

  • @montakute1328
    @montakute1328 5 місяців тому +7

    Sure buddy. Like the Titanic, "She's invincible!"🤣

    • @zenabi5605
      @zenabi5605 4 місяці тому

      😂🤣😂🤣good one

    • @matttheonlyy3046
      @matttheonlyy3046 2 місяці тому +1

      Why we need to protect Tera with diamonds from the Wasp Planet

  • @johnbryce8267
    @johnbryce8267 5 місяців тому +2

    most impressive of all... @23:08 2060 123mm cannon rounds in the Mig 31 FoxBat...

  • @Richard-vt7it
    @Richard-vt7it 5 місяців тому +12

    The rafale shot down the f22 in a war gag. What he doesn't tell you is all the restrictions that were put on the f22 . the deck was stacked against the f22
    In a real meeting the Rafael wouldn't have a chance it would be shot Down before it knew the f22 was within 100miles

    • @administrator7573
      @administrator7573 5 місяців тому +1

      I never heard of the restrictions. Are you aware of what they were?

  • @rockyg147
    @rockyg147 Місяць тому +1

    A Top Fighter Pilot Flying A Euro Fighter Typhoon will beat everyone 😀.

  • @dennissheridan1550
    @dennissheridan1550 3 місяці тому +1

    When discussing the F-111 it would have been nice to see more than example of it flying, but instead we get numerous other aircraft.

  • @BucketWheat
    @BucketWheat Місяць тому

    Primary necessity is for the pilot to have escape capacity

  • @austininc4
    @austininc4 4 місяці тому +2

    Nothing is invisible. Jets leave a "Heat Signature.

  • @thumper7047
    @thumper7047 4 місяці тому +3

    Listing both "Air Force" and "USAF" is a bit redundant as both are exactly the same. IN training missions, everyone CAN shoot down anyone and everyone. When the friendly planes train with the F-22, yes, they can register a kill, but the F-22 is not using everything it has. In fact, they eliminate 2 or 3 of its greatest strengths. SO yeah, when you take the fact that they are engaged in BFM when the F-22 would have killed the other fighter LONG before getting to that point, the F-22 is also carrying external fuel tanks and weapons out on pods instead of being kept internally. This would take away the F-22s stealth and maneuverability. So yeah, when you are allowed to get closer than anyone ever would and then fight an- F-22 without stealth or maneuverability, you have a chance. it has. The try with this configuration, then that, and so on and in some of those configurations, the stealth may be off, the jet may be only going fast enough to stay airborne. They don't just try to get away.
    So, if it was an actual battle, the F-22 would not have had anything external therefor having much better maneuverability and stealthiness- not that any of that matters as they would never reach BFM (Basic Fighter Maneuver).
    If you are familiar with wrestling (Olympics not WWE) you know there is a neutral start and a disadvantaged start. Neutral, both wrestlers start standing facing one another. Disadvantaged is when one wrestler starts on his hands and knees and the other is given an advantaged start. This is how the F-22's tat get short down are starting at a disadvantaged start and even then, a "kill" is rare. In real life the F-22 would most like start in the advantaged role as it would see the Eurofighters and all LONG before they saw the F-22 and would probably have been killed before ever get close enough to ever be in BFM.

  • @Four9sFineJewelry
    @Four9sFineJewelry 5 місяців тому +13

    “Invisible” does not mean “invincible.”

    • @mikepurvis4339
      @mikepurvis4339 5 місяців тому +2

      If you can't see it. Makes defeating it problematic to say the least.

    • @brinkum948
      @brinkum948 4 місяці тому

      The Title of the clip calls it 'INVINCIBLE' not 'INVISIBLE' - on of you two are mixing facts up.

    • @Colin-hp1li
      @Colin-hp1li 3 місяці тому +1

      Wow I think it might😢

    • @richardbarron8869
      @richardbarron8869 Місяць тому

      TRUE, BUT IT HELPS A GREAT DEAL! BESIDES, WE'VE BEEN DOING THIS A LONG TIME! I THINK WE'RE PRETTY DAMN GOOD AT IT!

  • @sailr
    @sailr 5 місяців тому +6

    While discussing the F-111 aardvark, russian aircraft are shown. What's up with that? And THEN it jumps BACK to the F-15?

    • @deltavee2
      @deltavee2 5 місяців тому

      Why it has just been struck from my recommendations.

  • @davidschweikhart459
    @davidschweikhart459 4 місяці тому +3

    It leaked fuel, not oil.

  • @BreconIReviews
    @BreconIReviews 4 місяці тому +3

    The F-15 proves itself as combat supreme via longevity despite almost being discontinued many times.

  • @jay_aich
    @jay_aich 5 місяців тому +1

    “You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.”

  • @corneljackson2991
    @corneljackson2991 5 місяців тому +1

    We say this in every Gen of combat aircraft

  • @WarrenSmyly
    @WarrenSmyly 5 місяців тому +2

    The sr71 has been obsolete for 50 years wtf

  • @erinblaisure9761
    @erinblaisure9761 3 місяці тому +1

    It’s not the plane, it’s the pilot. 😊

    • @Colin-hp1li
      @Colin-hp1li 2 місяці тому

      Pilots don't fly so well without planes🐔

  • @CarlAyers-x8h
    @CarlAyers-x8h 5 місяців тому +3

    It can say 2019 but can't say 1977
    1,977 😅

  • @administrator7573
    @administrator7573 5 місяців тому +3

    This is, without doubt, the hokiest air vid on UA-cam.

  • @oldschoolfoil2365
    @oldschoolfoil2365 5 місяців тому +2

    All prototypes of the Saab viggens Canard Wings design. notice how the SU57 try to infuse canard and wing together? Give me the old F104 Starfighter. it needed no wings. the wing was its fuselage vertical just flying on horizontal tail stabilizers. heheh

  • @richardseys8014
    @richardseys8014 5 місяців тому +2

    J 20 looks a lot like our 35

  • @JamesSotomayorSotomayor
    @JamesSotomayorSotomayor 5 місяців тому +7

    Where is the invinsible Jet Fighter?

    • @badwolfno9
      @badwolfno9 5 місяців тому +1

      That's what I was wondering.....

    • @jan22150
      @jan22150 4 місяці тому +1

      You can't see it, it's invisible!

  • @garyjohnstone6422
    @garyjohnstone6422 2 місяці тому +1

    tell us about the invincible one

  • @jamesmohr3187
    @jamesmohr3187 4 місяці тому +1

    the image's don't correspond the dialog. for example McDonald Douglas never made a Soviet aircraft

  • @edwardseghini5023
    @edwardseghini5023 3 місяці тому +1

    Higher # of flares.

  • @Vokieeeee
    @Vokieeeee 5 місяців тому +2

    Somebody will bypass that and still shoot it down ,lol ! They need Star Wars type Aircraft/Flying Saucers with Ray Beams that will demolish anything plus a Force Field that cannot be penetrated ,lol !

  • @WilliamCollins-sh6lm
    @WilliamCollins-sh6lm 5 місяців тому +2

    Build a better mouse an surely someone will build a better mouse trap !!!
    Nothing is Invensible long !!!
    Several times the Black Bird was intercepted an was pulled for a reason !!!

    • @brinkum948
      @brinkum948 4 місяці тому

      "Invensible long" - hmm

  • @tomfilipiak7103
    @tomfilipiak7103 Місяць тому

    Itlecked fuel not oil.

  • @WilliamCollins-sh6lm
    @WilliamCollins-sh6lm 5 місяців тому

    And I thought something new was going to be shown ???
    There's many toys in the toy box how about some of the new one's ???

  • @alexanderschmidgall8781
    @alexanderschmidgall8781 Місяць тому

    Tired of mislabeled videos

  • @BruceClark-lb1gg
    @BruceClark-lb1gg 3 місяці тому

    Although the F35 is a very formable aircraft , I still don't like it , I think it's under powered a is limited bye having only one engine

  • @CharlesRoberts-i4n
    @CharlesRoberts-i4n 4 місяці тому

    In 1966 and you thank we don’t have something so much faster. Take a look at the F22 I guess they just lied. Because the F 22 hads never lost on ben shot down. But that’s not the point the cow old the rafter is and do you think we don’t have something faster than that I can guarantee you we have something that’s way better than that.

  • @alevans51
    @alevans51 2 місяці тому +2

    Russia still has a long way to go.

  • @user-gs9ll5ud4c
    @user-gs9ll5ud4c Місяць тому

    Pure bovine scatology.......

  • @pekjinoei1042
    @pekjinoei1042 4 місяці тому

    SR71 is not stealth aircraft...

  • @sharonburmeister4149
    @sharonburmeister4149 2 місяці тому

    Pe Dogh Qo'

  • @Davidher480
    @Davidher480 5 місяців тому +1

    J-'20 and Russian jets are torfu ,is not what it show( torfu jets)

  • @dsmoke1972
    @dsmoke1972 5 місяців тому +2

    Wtf?

  • @SeanHorton-ky6ds
    @SeanHorton-ky6ds 5 місяців тому +1

    I need to correct you on that, The raptor smokes in the aircraft out there.

  • @Yellow-et1ig
    @Yellow-et1ig 5 місяців тому +1

    I wonder will this be in the air show because they have one already in the show that is silver

  • @SpaghettiFPV-tg3qh
    @SpaghettiFPV-tg3qh 5 місяців тому +1

    invisible.... not INVINCIBLE

  • @stevenkoski228
    @stevenkoski228 Місяць тому

    Peddling propaganda I see🙈.

  • @tax905972
    @tax905972 4 місяці тому

    I think this is a Russian-made video. So the headcount of those Russian jets is minimal.

  • @TommieChavez-h3x
    @TommieChavez-h3x 5 місяців тому

    🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏HOLY HOLY HOLY LORD GOD ALMIGHTY WHO WAS WHO IS AND WHO IS TO COME..