Student Shot Dead After Controversial Q&A | Law & Order
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 лют 2025
- Law & Order is streaming now on Peacock: pck.tv/46lNAcm
One student is shot dead after a controversial speaker's Q&A.
From "Talking Points" (Season 17, Episode 13): Judith Barlow (Guest Star Charlotte Ross), a controversial speaker, is participating in a Question and Answer at Grammercy College when the stage is mobbed. Someone in the crowd fires a gun, leaving one student dead. Detective Ed Green (Jesse L. Martin) and Nina Cassady (Milena Govich) question the victims friend Malcolm Yates (Guest star Louis Cancelmi), an older PhD student who creates human embryos to harvest stem cells. It is discovered that Yates has Parkinson's disease and finds Barlow's tactics as a direct threat to his job and life. Yates' attorney, Bernie Adler (Guest star Ron Silver), is from the ACLU. During the trial Silver infuriates the jury by using racial epithets, which also angers the judge.
Subscribe: / @lawandordernbc
Show Synopsis: In the criminal justice system, the people are represented by two separate yet equally important groups: the police who investigate crime and the district attorneys who prosecute the offenders. These are their stories. From Emmy-winning creator Dick Wolf, with its groundbreaking "ripped-from-the-headlines" format, comes the highly-acclaimed, longest-running crime series in television history.
#LawAndOrder #PeacockTV
Channel description:
Welcome to the official UA-cam channel for Law & Order. Watch all of the official clips from the series, some of the best moments from within the criminal justice system, where the people are represented by two separate yet equally important groups: The police, who investigate crime, and the district attorneys, who prosecute the offenders.
Google Play & iTunes links
About Peacock: The streaming service from NBCUniversal that’s as free as a bird. Current hits. Timeless classics. Timely updates. Stream Now With Peacock, stream current hits, hundreds of movies, thousands of episodes of TV shows, and exclusive Originals - plus timely news, live sports, WWE, and daily pop culture. Peacock’s got all your faves, including Parks & Rec, Yellowstone, Modern Family, and every episode of The Office.
Get More Peacock:
► Follow Peacock on TikTok: / peacocktv
► Follow Peacock on Instagram: / peacocktv
► Like Peacock on Facebook: / peacocktv
► Follow Peacock on Twitter: / peacocktv
I was in this scene. They filmed at Brooklyn College. It was fun because we all had to stand aside and watch the stunt people that did the fight rehearse so we would know their placement and no one would accidentally get decked.
Did ya get paid or was that like internship work?
@@ADJackD I was a paid background actor. Granted I was not in the Union at the time, so I didn’t get paid much. In fact the very first background gig I ever did was another Law and Order episode, “Fame.”
@@dkupke wait.. union? You have to be part of a union to be an actor in the U.S.?
@@ADJackD don’t have to, but if you want to make real money it sure helps.
@@ADJackD law an order
speaker: “…while dismissing it as irrelevant”
crowd member: “YOU’RE IRRELEVANT”
i’m wheezing that was hilarious
Irrelevant to make a 500 peoples crowd come to hear you talk
Speaker: You’re irrelevant! You’re all irrelevant! 👉🏻
Not to say the obvious, but the show is scripted. It's fictional. And of course, scriptwriters come with intense biases of their own, some of which they have no shame in pushing into their work.
Ask yourself why the scriptwriters (or their bosses) chose to make the mob look so irrational, more so than most college mobs are. Ask yourself why our mainstream media is amplifying the most extreme voices to make all partisans- and especially progressive ones- look bad.
Think about who controls the media and how they benefit from pitting Gentile against Gentile.
@@somemoreplaylists1781 Mainstream media is mostly progressive, and many progressive college students are irrational, to the point they throw a temper tantrum when they are called with the wrong pronouns, and in cases like this, they make an entire protests about some idiot who is going to give a speech, when they can simply not attend to it and make it irrelevant.
Which is weird because the fact that someone shows up proves she isn't irrelevant to them.
God bless everyone.
“I would rather have a root canal.”
Perfection.
His delivery on that line was amazing too.
I had a root canal. Now I have the urge to compare every experience I ever had to a root canal.
With no anesthesia. Anything is more pleasurable than political ranting and raving. Right, left or throwing up somewhere in between. 💯
@@curtiswhiteheadjr1322 yup. Tho if she's kinky you could choke her while doing her so she doesn't talk 😂
...in a part of the body with no teeth.
I love the fact that this character is so arrogant that she thinks it’s funny that someone is dead. And sees no irony in anything.
The character does see the irony but acknowledges it with shameless rhetoric. All she's care about is exposing how much the government sucks and humanity's unrelenting bias towards opinions and concepts.
@@TheMightyN That’s a good point I’m gonna have to watch the clip again and look at it from that perspective.
@@thebossjasonwilliams Make sure you stamp the Chris Rock slap as your footnote adjacent to critical perception.
Good thing nobody like that exists in the real world today.
@@TonesOverthinksIt That is a joke, I get. It is not funny, but I get it.
I like how Van Buren gets the idea to break him just by having the woman talk to him.
Ngl, i’d break too.
when you get insane people, talking logic makes them mad and unhinged.
Ha!
@@tymoore2117 except she’s the one who’s unhinged. Hence why she needs feminine wiles to be taken seriously. People who know the books don’t need to use the looks.
so does that mean he did it and the bullet hit his friend instead?
judge "I'll sign anything" Barski, what a nickname to have.
Rule number 1: it’s ok to disagree but never ever physically attack.
@@chloegrobler4275 Even the Liberals don't believe that anymore, or haven't you noticed that they're getting scared and lashing out at the prospect that America might get 4 more years of greatness?
@@chloegrobler4275I disagree. It’s not a liberal take to not choose violence. You can have a civil conversation about an issue without resorting to violence. That’s what nonsense extremists do.
TELL THAT TO THE ISREALIS! force wins when people dont want to talk or listen. thats just the truth. @@sweethistortea
@@chloegrobler4275Always got to make it a liberal vs conservative thing. You’ll rot your brain thinking of everything as being ‘them vs us’.
liberal as in capital L liberal, not some american thing my dude. @@Mugiwara2k
I love the detectives reaction and comment to the ladies flirting advances " I would rather have a root canal" I can't blame him for saying that either
Well if Charlotte Ross thunder flirted with me like that .... ohhhh yeah 😂
I wish I could afford a root canal.
I didn't watch this episode, but his malice and *apparent* intent to kill her after being provoked isn't even close to a confession. They already knew he hated her, but so did everyone in the auditorium. How is that grounds for an arrest?
Him getting his hands on her with obvious intent to harm gets him an assault or attempted assault charge.
@@slateGray5649 I would say assault and battery. She’s loathesome but I would use my words.
@@slateGray5649 Assault and battery.
@@slateGray5649It's the double standards. You intentionally provoke a suspect with a political zealot, of course words will fail and instinct reigns supreme. Like cornering an animal into corner; it's a safety mechanism.
@@TheMightyN yeah normal humans dont want to kill someone because a difference of opinions
0:37 “Some people are more equal than others.”
-Animal Farm
@BCTMB back when i was a kid growing up in ireland, i was deemed less than human because i was a catholic living in a protestant part of town, been shot twice before i was even 10, just google "the troubles" and see what life was for those deemed "lesser"
Thanks Cap.
It's true tho no one's truly equal we're all too different for that to make any logical sense.
We do however all deserve equal rights.
NO ONE IS EQUAL LIFE ISNT EQUAL get over it.
@@Squiiiiiiii117 is that a justification for slavery, racism, or any form of oppression?
“Sorry, I don’t speak French.”
I love that line.
I love the actress playing ‘NOT Ann Coulter’, she gives off that smug sense of some who thinks they’re smarter than everyone when in reality they’re vapid and dense as a brick wall.
Hoillywood only makes conservatives look evil in tv shows and movies then wonder why the country is divided.
@@tdestroyer4780 because Conservatives are evil
They even nailed "NOT Ann" being attracted to black men LOL!
@@tdestroyer4780 Conservatives are passing bigoted bills and shouting about how the high gas prices are Biden’s fault while also believing outlandish conspiracies. How they’re portrayed in media is not far from the truth.
Charlotte Ross
I love how Loo called him Justin and less than 30 seconds later they call him Jason.
Well spotted.
Script supervisor and editor both missed that one.
Welcome to the world of Justin's bring mistaken for Jason's XD
@@adamplace1414 > so did the actor
Unless the detective wanted to rile him up to throw him off his guard -- I didn't watch the show way back that far so honestly don't know if that was a particular interrogation technique of that detective.
When you try being an assassin but are also a horrible shot…
And he completely lost control when his target began to taunt him in a police station, thus proving him to be the assassin.
@@theforgeryttv6449 yeah, he definitely wasn‘t cut out for it.
@@theforgeryttv6449Civil prestige must've contaminated your brain stem. Let's not forget any against a quick tongue like while already on the defense will attack said person. It's basic nature.
@@Swissswoosherjust like the guy in Butler
Strange how impressively Law & Order called this years before.
Man…they called a LOT of stuff
@@aaronburgin1442 Yeah, they really HAVE called a bunch of stuff.
What'd they call?
It’s lowkey not that strange since politics is pretty cyclical. Also, there’s Sociology which makes people easily predictable.
They've been talking about these kinds of things since Season 1, the show was a pioneer for a long time.
"You want a cup of...hot black disappointment?"😂😂😂😂😂
“I’d rather have a root canal” that is now my go to line to turn down assholes
Great idea, I will use it too!
Mine is "I'd rather have a colonoscopy
Glad to see guy who can't stop working while being questioned about murder is alive and well.
A john mulaney fan?...me too..😂😂
It's easy to be mouthy to someone when they're being held back.
It's easy to claim to be in the right when you're threatening to lynch your opposition into silence.
The guy in the lab they talked to was in another episode where he drugged his employee and she crashed a car full of kids
I disliked that fellow
I literally just watched that episode today and said "Hold up-"
I guess with big, long running shows like this, they actually cast actors repeatedly fairly often
@@azariazulu Considering that Law and Order's raw total for episode count, it's likely they didn't hold such a major expectation people would actually watch *EVERYTHING* just to keep track of repeat faces.
Phew, I thought only I noticed that :D
The guy in the lab played Harry Crane in the Mad Men series with John Hamm.
“If it was valid whatsoever, the corporate world would be all over it…”
No, if it was *profitable* corporations would be all over it
Great casting, great dialogue
if there is no profit to be had, viability suffers since little funding outside government, which means a waste of a few million for little gained research. only reliable thing is eccentric people who usually go into inventions or research.
@@tymoore2117
There is also the potential PR issue. A company entering into an area that has significant political ramifications ends up being hated by the people on the other side of the issue. Some companies have been boycotted and had significant declines in their stock value for these kinds of things.
@@tymoore2117i’d argue curing cancer would be “valid” but too much money is made treating rather than curing
Prioritizing profits holds back progress, primarily because corporations want as much profit as quickly as possible
Who cares if Nuclear is by far the best source of power? It’s more profitable to convince the government there’s a war in some part of the globe most people couldn’t find and raise the price of oil by using the cover of “increased demand”
Who cares if the average person would wildly benefit from reliable public transit? Build cities to be impossible to navigate without a car, have the government pay for it, and have the government mandate car insurance, you’ve just profited three industries at the cost of billions of taxpayer dollars a year
Who cares if 40% of people have no savings? Bribe officials to not change minimum wage, don’t pay taxes, then call people lazy when 60 hrs a week isn’t enough to put a roof over their head so they have to rely on tax dollars (which, remember, you’re not paying) just to live
Who cares if justice is blind? Convince the people privatization is the best thing since sliced bread and own the prisons, then bribe politicians to “declare war” on any number of things, causing people with addictions to avoid seeking help and bettering their life
So many problems can be traced back to the government prioritizing “people” who “speak”
And before you come back with “the government is the issue” look up what company towns were like
Spoiler alert: corporations don’t have to abide by the constitution
The idea that intelligence could somehow be linked to your right to vote is dangerous. What defines intelligence is very debatable. Once your 18 you have the right to vote unless you violate the law and for most that’s temporary.
It's not dangerous, it's smart. Why don't they just make the voting age 5? Seems just as BIAS that it's 18.
@@kerenton5897 Who decides whose "smart enough" to vote? You'll cheer it on until you're also deemed unfit. You want a dictatorship? Because that's how you get a dictatorship.
@@kerenton5897 that’s mental illness. I believe she’s saying that you have to take an IQ test to vote. That could easily be abused.
It's quite clear what intelligence means and IQ tests measure it pretty well. Even experts admit there isnt racial bias in them either when you look at studies that control for variables like education, nutrition, familial background etc.
@@kerenton5897 Intelligent people are very often authoritarians, left and right. If you're going to restrict franchise, there are other criteria that would make more sense. Service to your country, for example.
I feel like this is going to be an interesting comment section in a week or two, I'll have to check back in
I have a feeling everyone's gonna be at each other's throats.
By then it's gonna be worse than halfway through the Royal Rumble 💪 I'm coming back too and see how many people have attempted to DDT someone else 😃
You’re in luck
Judith is insufferable. The professor is insufferable. Two sides of the same coin, each screaming at the other about how right they are and how wrong the other is. Politics are the worst.
Only one was deliberately interfering with the other to try and stop their speech.
@@obliviouz It wasn't a speech. It was a QNA. Meaning she and they were having an open debate about politics.
The protest you're thinking of was outside.
The event was supposed to have both sides talking.
"I'd rather have root canal" 😂
WOW! I had no idea Charlotte Ross guest starred in L&O. I remember when she used to star in NYPD Blue during the latter part of the series.
When he lashed out at her, did he like confessed to the murder?
he said "i should have shot you and not (whatever the dude's name was i already forgot)"
Jason.
@@ameliakyle7054 I’m pretty sure that not what he said. Lol…
He didn't confess, he just said it SHOULD have been her and NOT Jason.
@@ShamanSZN that's basically confession
I like this episode. Debate is important for anyone whatever political ideas you hold. Some people can’t handle that and go in guns a-blazing. Literally and not in a good way.
I agree that Debate is important, but the Character she was portraying was not their to debate, but rather to make people angry enough to cause as least one of them to loose their temper, so she could ether pretend to be the victim, or to pretend the other side doesn't have reason backing there beliefs.. Its kind of funny you know, at one point in time, if a speaker drove a crowed to rage, that speaker would be held legally accountable for what they did, as well as those in the crowed that violently attacked folks or damaged things. Inciting violence used to be actually considered a crime, but not much any more..
But I do agree that actual Debate is important, its just too bad the folks going to campus's are not trying to debate people.. The whole point of a debate was always to come to a answer, not just personally but as a group. Lets say me and you were actually debating, and you said something that proved me wrong, its my roll in that debate to admit I was wrong. If I proved that a fact you stated was wrong, a definition was wrong, or a talking point you used was wrong, you would no longer use said talking point, you would admit you were wrong and we could keep moving forward. It doesn't matter if we are debating something to do with religion or politics or some small part of a theory in Science, we both correct ourselves when we are wrong, and one of us is at one point going to need to accept that our stance in the debate was wrong..
The best debates may seem to be the ones you watch or listen to on the radio, but those are almost never debates.. Real debates are going to take weeks or months, and they are almost always written. In a honest debate, you want your interlocutor to have time to Fact Check what you said, and themselves before responding. The only way we could have such a thing on T.V. is if each person had a few days between each individual person reading their responses to one another. Such a thing would be best recorded over weeks or months until one side is proven correct, and then splice those responses together to appear as if people are responding in almost real time to one another... It would take a bit of work, but that could be a real debate, but that is not what we get.....
@@lfaf9509 all those words, not reading them all. Just know that moderated debate is a bs excuse for a lack of free speech.
@@Billybobjoe_151
I can tell you didn't read what I said at all, because your response doesn't address anything I really said. Your response is more of a pre-canned talking point type response, and mine was a decently worded explanation of something complicated.
@@lfaf9509 I mean free speech isn't supposed to be regulated, and you expect me to respect your essay just because it is written by "debate based" conventions. Debate and online comment sections are not compatible.
@@Billybobjoe_151
In my First response, I covered a few topics, the first one was what the character was doing, which was not debating but trying to enrage a crowed of people/drive them to do violence. Also known as inciting violence which is a crime. The Second topic was what is and is not a debate and what makes it a debate. The third was how a actual debate has to work to be a actual debate..
All rights are regulated to some degree or another, case in point you can say pretty much what ever you want online, but if you threaten to kill or harm someone, you can and often enough will go to jail for that threat. Just remember that old saying, you have a right to swing your fist, but that right ends at my nose.. Well its the same idea :)
I hope all is well, please try to read what I said this time. Good day and good luck :)
I hate it when somebody starts out with "..so you are saying..." or "in other words ...". It tells me they are hell-bent on misinterpreting what I just said and intend to put words into my mouth that I never said.
It's the "I like pancakes" "oh so you are saying you hate waffles" all over again!
Yes because weak statements are prone to being torn apart
No sometimes there actually is just context between the lines. Please chill.
dumb take, learn how to speak
My favorite part is the "Jackass Judy" protestor holding the sign upside-down.
It's almost as if some scriptwriters, directors, or even producers had some not-so-secret political biases and wanted to distort reality and make extremists look even more extreme and stupid than they actually are.
You know exactly who controls our media. Hollywood is chock full of a certain self-segregating ethnic minority, many of them with dual citizenship or with guaranteed emigration "rights" to their safety valve country in the Middle East. When America falls apart, this minority will be unscarred, while the rest of us- the 97% not born to the right mothers' mothers- suffer.
Fwiw, a panopticon, a 360 degree surveillance post, located on a village green, was also prominently featured in an episode of Midsomer Murder. The things you learn from watching murder mysteries.
Going out on a limb here, but I suspect that the audience cross section who would watch Law and Order *AND* Midsomer Murders would be very small. You and I belong to a very exclusive club here. I do remember that MM episode. It was a Victorian era piece of equipment.
Gotta love the upside down sign on the left at the very beginning lol
This episode demonstrates, perfectly, why I hate both ends of the political spectrum.
malding?
WAT that's what you took from this???? americans pls the cognitivie dissonance, my brain
Same. Makes people act like wild animals just because they're in a different political party. Same with sports.
Definitely dislike both sides. If one isn't gaslighting the other surely is.
Look on the bright side if we weren't the majority one party would have all the power by now.
Here is how this should have went down
Lady detective: oh we’re gonna be here for awhile
Suspect: no we’re not, lawyer.
Are we just… ignoring the upside down sign?
Its almost like they want something like this to happen
Hoping i could watch full episode please 🙏🙏🙏♥️✌
Huge kudos to the actress playing the woman at the beginning, I was VIBRATING with rage and I had the luxury of pausing the scene
Edit: Some of y'all need a hobby. Touch grass
Hah made you look. Commenting here isn't the "lol triggered libtards owned" statement you think it is. I'm making a statement on the impressive ability of the actress, the same as I would for a Caitlin Riley video about a crafted character. It's sad, m'dude, I made this like three months ago and you're still mad about it. It's a law and order clip not congress.
It takes a good actor to play a horrible person convincingly. Or you just got a horrible person who's an actor, either way
Were you *literally shaking* too? That a TV show, with an actor, portraying a different political opinion made you vibrate to the point of having to pause UA-cam? Get a grip and come back down to reality
@@gipsydanger5020 stop taking everything so literally, you sound like Ben Shapiro
Must've been the feminist comment that got you.
@@gipsydanger5020 you're not very sharp are you?
best show ever
Nothing can compare ❤❤
I remember this episode. That guy was convicted in court because he claimed his Parkinson’s Disease made him slip with the gun and it discharged by accident. Jack McCoy proved that he was lying because he claimed he was working with his chemistry set beforehand. How could he have done that safely if he had been suffering from tremors? Caught him hook, line and sinker.
Linus Roache. Richard Brooks. Anthony Anderson. Jeremy Sisto. Stephanie March. Raul Esparza. Annabella Sciorra.
Why was the arrest scene oddly satisfying?
That's Charlotte Ross from DOOL. So it was the Grad Student? He aimed wrong? Dude almost choked her! 🙄
Thanks, I knew she looked familiar.
Charlotte Ross also played Connie in NYPD Blue.....best cop show ever 💜
Had no idea detective west was an officer in multiple cities
2:07 I completely forgot that Mrs Goodwin from Chicago MED was also in Law and Order! 😮
Back when Donna Smoak first met Joe West. If you know, you know.
Wait that was Felicities mom? I knew she looked familiar she was so good in Arrow.
People who act violent over words/politics should be locked in a cage forever.
i agree
So that includes politicians that incite the violence right?
@@glambertgurl1117 I said people, politicians are people :)
@@dannyhouchinjr.4852 Fair point. Sorry lol.
And u don't think that makes u any better?
College student gets shot, some thought Barlow was the target, but all Barlow does is treat it like a joke.
Was that kid from Ned survival school classified as that Professor LOL
“I’d rather have a root canal” 😂 perfect…
This is our country right now. A little rhetoric goes a long way.
This blonde girl actually represents a girl in the news and political industry from what I remember. Seen her appear on fox news and stuff just can't remember her name
There are many of them on Fox News!
Ann Coulter
You're probably thinking of Tomi Lahren(a.k.a. Privileged Barbie). She's a neo-conservative and mainly concentrates on economic politics.
Marjorie Taylor Greene?
Fortunately Ann Coulter has kind of faded away. Unfortunately, MTG is like the newer, stupider version of bimbo.
I’m confused, so did he intend to kill him or the girl
Her last quote was paraphrasing Gore Vidal after Norman Mailer decked him😹
Seriously, what body guard, in the 2000s, carries .38s as a principle weapon?
His students are morally opposed to violence… yet they support Fidel Castro 😂
Why do you belief they all share the same ideals?
I find it funny that all commie leaders are super evil according to you guys, but Fidel and his commie government wasn't responsible for 9/11.The first one, not the second.
Why Victimized 😂🤣
Based. To both.
I like the “Judith” (blonde) character. I find her condescending remarks, endearing.
She definitely knows how to push people's buttons. And, oddly, it is endearing.
Very talented
but she is speaking the truth the bold Baren truth that no one wants to except because it goes against everything that many people force themselves to believe about the world it's true propaganda is everywhere. people who lie are hailed as Einsteins you should listen and those. Who speak the heavy truth are to be shunned and hated, I can't stand that I tell the truth I never say what people want to hear I always say what people need to hear and many hate me for it but even more respect me for it.
@@OODLESMCBOODELS lol
@@OODLESMCBOODELS Did you ask an AI to pretend its trump to write that?
9:00 No counterargument just an indirect insult. Way to prove her point.
"Do you talk like this in public" doesn't sound very friendly either.
Ed Green just turned down Charlotte Ross? Insanity
I'm gay and I would have considered it
Very interesting.
Look, I'm no conservative but complaining about big brother while having the Cuban Flag represented in your office seems a little hypocritical
Yes. It's the sort of hypocrisy that is sadly very common in extremists anywhere on the political map, but that specific example (along with the Che poster) is a really blatant 'left-but-crazy-or-shallow' signal.
To say nothing of the fact he's got a photo of Chairman Mao in pride of place on his blackboard.
@@princecharon Yeah that professor gave me "Left-in-name" Vibes.
Man had communism all over that room
far left and far right are the same insane scumbags
Showed my bf this the " I'd rather have a root canal." I have never seen him cackle. It was delightful
so asking anyone who's seen this one, did he actually kill Jason and if so was it because he was aiming for the woman and missed?
Everyone is equal. Some are more equal than others.
Why did they ask the person in Yates' lab about Kirsten, saying she was Yates' girlfriend? I thought she was established to be the victim's girlfriend.
They were trying to get a better feel on what kind of a person Yates was, and that implying he had a girlfriend, they could either confirm Kirsten was cheating and it could be a lover's triangle situation, or that it wasn't and makes Yates look more suspicious. Plus, Yates had said they visited all the time. That right away proved a lie.
When you have 2 people,1 who makes a point to be knowledgeable and well informed and really care about things,and 1 who couldn't care less about anything,1 DOES have the right to voice their opinion on issues because they know of what they speak of,but 1 really DOESN'T because they know little or nothing to be capable of speaking.take a guess which is which.
2:36 Both actors will meet again in their respective DC shows in a few years
Donna Smoak and Joe West!
That part at 9:15 is very satisfying and smart of Barlow
Do you think if the producers approached the real Anne Coulter to star in this episode that she would agree to it?
Considering they were intentionally attempting to portray her in the worst light possible in order to propagandize against the American right...I doubt it.
@@guyledouche4102 I don't think you understand what the world "propaganda" means, dearie.
@@strangerinastrangeland3613 Oh I do. This is propaganda. You're just pathetically naive if you think otherwise. This was a direct smear against Anne Coulter.
@@strangerinastrangeland3613
"Information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view."
No, they used it correctly. This is a caricature of Ann Coulter or an amalgam of similar female pundits.
Nice
🇷🇺
I will say one thing, she’s not entirely wrong about the female police officer bit. While not said in the best way by any means (making allowances for the fact this was a TV show) I have seen multiple videos of women police officers getting overpowered by male perpetrators. Not saying women can’t be good police officers, only they should have good backup.
Considering that women police officers are a higher ratio of "accidental firearm discharge". That coupled with being taught to always be on edge, it is not a job that a vast majority of women can handle.
She's speaking facts fr 1:20
Woah, they got Lauren Southern on Law and Order a decade before she was a political figure???
Truly, a show ahead of its time!
It’s funny you see Lauren Southern in a character who is meant to represent Ann Coulter. Same schtick, different decade.
@@SwordsmanRyan never watched Ann Coulter but i distinctly recall Southern getting attacked like this at least once.
The right wing always needs attractive blonde woman or lecherous old men to tell them what to think and how to feel.
@@imcallingjapan2178 why you gotta come here with them negative waves, man?
@@dfmrcv862 Don't shoot the messenger. That's the trouble with the American public, and the reason such right wing pundits are successful: you prefer a nice lie to an uncomfortable fact.
This episode aged frighteningly well.
This comment section should be interesting.
lmao fr
How dare you!! Blocked and reported.
Somebody please tell me what happened with this episode!
they kida just mixed and matched political views on this one. The professor saying the government it too intrusive is kinda an oxymoron when supporting Communists and socialist's governments when all their power comes from an overbearing government. And the right activist saying that people are too stupid to vote ignores her whole ideal that every life should have the same rights. Maybe that wanted to make a commentary on it but Idk, just seems like a lot of holes
Exactly! I had to rewatch because I was incredibly confused
If the left thinks that socialist communist country is where everyone is equal..... I dont know what more to tell... We know whats life like in communist USSR, we know what china is like under mao. Just look up how many genocides & famines caused by these "socialist".
Well, we are fed this false idea that Liberals are Communists and Conservatives are Nazi's, but the reality is much more complex than simple left vs right b.s. that is usually fed to us on T.V. Think about it, during the hippy days who was saying the government should stay out of their lives the loudest? It was those liberal Hippies who wanted to smoke weed and make love not war.. That doesn't make liberals seem as if they want a over bearing government now does it? Don't get me wrong, conservative folks have had movements who wanted the government to stay out of their lives as well, but that is usually a response to folks not wanting to pay taxes. But sometimes you do get conservative voters who want the government to stay out of their personal lives as well, you know the whole "Get Off My Land you stinking Feds" grouping of Conservative voters..
My point is simple, its not simple as liberal=Communists Conservative=Nazi.. Though Communists were liberal, not all liberal folks are communist's, just like the Nazi's were Conservatives, but not all conservatives are Nazi's.. The world rarely works in a simple way, even if a lot of folks want to believe it is simple, most things are just not that simple.
@@stressedwimp7529 don’t think too much about it. It’s not a real commentator, it’s a funny character. What they say makes no sense but it doesn’t have to to be enjoyable
they kinda nailed both with it though. which is what makes both problematic since they do not have a clue what they are saying, granted the right activist is also trying to rile students up since its easy to get them to rage and scream. Maybe have someone actually think for once, which usually produces people who hates both sides.
I've always been a fan of Charlotte Ross. Loved her on NYPD Blue: she was better than Delaney, in my opinion!✌️
Wow 😮
If Judith Barlow isn't supposed to be Anne Coulter, then I don't know who she's supposed to be.
Right?
My favorite part of this episode is when McCoy and Rubirosa meet up with Yates and his attorney.
Yates: I had no reason to shoot Jason.
McCoy: I agree. You intended to shoot Judith Barlow.
Yates' lawyer: *turns to look at Yates* Oh, God bless you.
😆😆😆
The opening part of this scene would make John Munch smile.
i love the swipe at bill maher the actress does. his statement about religious people being mentally ill was horrid.
Religious people may not be mentally ill, but I don't think they're anywhere near the pinnacle of peak human intelligence, sorry. Blind faith and believing everything someone who came a generation before you also said was absolute truth just shows that certain people are weak-minded and need a coping mechanism to get through life
@@gipsydanger5020 Yikes buddy, you must be a great human being and not some anti-religion supremacist of sorts
@@gipsydanger5020 the issue is religion isn't the only thing that happens with
Political are the same way based on what previous people built
Same for country allegiance and a million other things.
@@gipsydanger5020 religion has its purpose for a few different things but mainly its based of wonderment and how could probilitlity of 0.0000000000000000000000000000000001% exist, ie earth being inhabitable along with all the other things for existence. So people believe that someone or thing made it. people would rather believe that than there is no purpose other than to live, die and repeat. Also tbh everything you mostlikely believe in came from the generation before you, else you would believe the world is a sphere, (which thb is similar thinking as Sir Bacon nothing outside of himself exists)
I don’t think religious people are mentally ill, but I do believe the MAGA crowd have created a cult around Trump. They have become deranged and can’t acknowledge any fact that challenges their world view. It’s quite scary.
captain had a big brain moment at the end.
Mr Detective Guy standing there like not realizing how good looking he is when he received her number. 😅
Sounds to me like this guy wanted his friend gone so his gains wouldn’t go under siege- seems like even a sarcastic public speaker can even break a suspects conscience 🤣😏
"I've got drinks with Rush"
Well that aged poorly.
Well so did he, so it's appropriate. Rest in Hell, Rush.
?
As despisable as she is, how are they so sure that the speaker was the intended target? The killer could have killed the right guy after all.
Hey! I made it into Law and order! Guess I’m a judge now? :D
Good Morning Actors
Strawman aside, how is inequity caused by people's indivdual choices racist?
Because the activists say so. That way they can convince people that literally every single inconvenience a “person of color” comes across in life can be blamed on racism.. while also insisting that because of it, they must lower educational requirements (“to make it fairer for people of color” which is basically them ironically acting like people with dark skin are inherently dumber) and hire people based primarily on how much they fulfill a “diversity” checklist.
(All but saying that they think “blacks can’t do anything on their own without a gigantic crutch”)
They now insist that there is a deliberate racist reason why there have been more successful “whites” than “blacks” (when in reality it’s been mostly because of a general population numbers thing) while simultaneously telling students it’s “assimilating into white culture” if a person with dark skin gets anywhere in life on their own merits and/or behaves/looks like anything other than a walking “geto” stereotype.
It’s “gentrification” if “white” people move to a place that happens to have “blacks”, and it’s “white flight” if they move away from said place. The entire movement has become littered with these contradictory mindsets that seem to exist just to encourage paranoia and make people think every other “white” person is secretly some closet nazi.
Exactly. There cannot be absolute equality of outcomes in society because that doesn't even exist within families. My siblings and I had the same upbringing, but very different outcomes due to different life choices.
It is ignorant.
Individual black person MAY largely be responsible for living underpriviliged life because of their choices, but since blacks are not dumber as a group there is no basis to assume that Black People as a group are responsible for living worse life with their choices.
this episode felt like it was pointing out why both sides are so annoying.
only one side is attacking people physically for disagreeing.
I like how the actual target seemed so sure that her intelligence would be part of those she considered to be worthy of having a chance to vote.
Forgetting that there are people smarter than her who would obviously consider otherwise and it won't be long before she has to use her brawn with her brains than her brains alone.
"Do not exclude someone because of a characteristic. You never know until you meet someone with a better characteristic than you and that person judges you the same."
Ms. Barlow: Some people are better than others.
Me: Who gets to decide? A drug dealer like you?
Then try to join the NBA or NFL, somehow I don't think they'll take your defense of their racist seriously when you fail. lols
Is this a joke? I used to watch L&O back in the day and it was great. This looks like it was written by a college dropout
Worse. Mariska Hargitay.
say what you want but that chant was catchy af
Liberals and conservatives have different thought ideology, but can have common ground. Remember, we may have different view points and opinions, but we all still have the same color blood, red. But yes, this is making conservatives look bad.
Of course it is. It's a liberal show
there are idiots, many I might add, on both sides.
Only place with many saints is Newark in The Sopranos' universe
Aren't the liberals the ones doing the shooting, killing and fighting in the episode? (Even during civil debates)
Sure back ago but now? Nah there is no longer any common ground.
the professor doesnt look any better, talking about how anti violence his students are while hanging up a picture of mao, lol
if you pick a side and stick to it instead of hearing out both sides you’re not intelligent
I believe that in order to vote you need some sort of ID. That could be a Library card, a student ID, a DL, or something else like that.
Sounds like a no-brainer to me. Why shouldn't people confirm who they are when voting?
In Australia it is compulsory to vote for Australian citizen.
Republicans have admitted they only want the system in place so they can stop anyone they identify as liberal from voting. Republicans are psychotic & out of touch with reality because they think a fictional character will reward them for their hatred. They're a terrorist group that works for Russian interests over American citizens.
@@diosoth Yeah......got any proof of that? lol
I mean...the NYT only confirmed that Hunter Biden's laptop and all the connections to China were real. Whereas...didn't the Mueller report result in negative bupkis for the most part on Russian interference in the 2016 election? And wasn't the Steele Dossier proven to be a manufactured work of fiction paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign?
What the heck are the protesters screaming at the beginning? I listened a few times and couldn’t figure it out.