Utility Maximization with a Cobb-Douglas Utility Function

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 107

  • @darkacademiax_
    @darkacademiax_ 2 роки тому +32

    Why do professors make this sound sooooo complicated. This is so straight forward thank you. ❤

  • @princeagyei6095
    @princeagyei6095 Рік тому +7

    thank you very much honorable i nearly dropped economics because of this, but after watching this video over and over again within 24 hrs ive understood, thank you my new lecturer

  • @proudmalaysian24
    @proudmalaysian24 2 роки тому +1

    i cannot comprehend why my lecturer make it so hard to understand, you are truly a saviour, may god bless you sir

  • @peppa_pig_
    @peppa_pig_ 7 років тому +2

    it takes my long-winded professor an hour and a half to explain these concepts.....thank you

  • @swarnasishsaha9681
    @swarnasishsaha9681 2 роки тому +9

    This working is actually very straightforward and helpful. The textbooks on the other hand, not so much

  • @angelli8762
    @angelli8762 6 років тому +86

    this is so easy and staight forward, why does textbook mess up everything and make them so complicated???

    • @bernhardkoster3095
      @bernhardkoster3095 3 роки тому +2

      Sorry, but this calculation is awkward. Just divide MUx by MUy and you`re done! This trick works always by CD-utility. I don not this instructor knows this!

  • @baileychoy9831
    @baileychoy9831 8 років тому +21

    This viedo just saved my Econ grade!!

  • @sarojdani3201
    @sarojdani3201 3 роки тому +2

    Very good explanation. Hardly good quality videos are uploaded with good explanation.👍

  • @CharityKyabanasha
    @CharityKyabanasha 6 місяців тому +1

    Ohooooo thanks have understood this it's very simple I used to struggle alot but now everything is very simple ❤❤❤❤

  • @n.morgan1428
    @n.morgan1428 4 роки тому +2

    You just saved my whole midterm. Than you!

  • @himadrinag5332
    @himadrinag5332 7 років тому +37

    Is this really a Cobb-Douglas function ?
    I knew that CDFs are of the form U = X^a . Y^(1-a)
    But here the exponents are summing up to 0.75.

    • @leoyu577
      @leoyu577 6 років тому +2

      Himadri Nag Yeah I was wondering about that as well!

    • @yifanbao8264
      @yifanbao8264 5 років тому +2

      I feel like this is more of a CES method.

    • @bernhardkoster3095
      @bernhardkoster3095 3 роки тому +1

      @@yifanbao8264 utility is ordinal, so it does not matter if you take x^0,5*y^0.25 or x^2*y or x^(2/3)*y^(1/3) try. But only the last one is homothetic which leads in an aggregation for social welfare to a concave utility possibility curve, but all this important stuff is not said in the video, it is just stupid calculation with no explanaition!

  • @mikaelrecine9486
    @mikaelrecine9486 7 років тому +2

    You're the best! Thank you for helping me finally complete my assignment!

  • @edmondlleshi8683
    @edmondlleshi8683 2 роки тому +1

    There is an error in the equation.When you multiply by 4 both sides, the left side is not anymore multiplied by 1/2 but just by 2 because 4/2=2.

  • @getaway1085
    @getaway1085 2 роки тому +1

    consumer has the utility function: u(x,y) = 5x + 6xy + y2 + 38x + 18y a) Determine the marginal utility for the two commodities. Is more always better for the consumer? b) The consumer has a budget of £40. A unit of the x commodity costs £10 and a unit of the y commodity cost £5. Write down the budget equation. c) The consumer wants to maximize his utility subject to his budget constraint. Write down the Lagrangian for this problem. d) Calculate x, y and e) Calculate the utility maximization,

  • @TheSamthaman24
    @TheSamthaman24 9 років тому +57

    l love you,I love you,I love you

  • @tjopat3866
    @tjopat3866 Рік тому

    Another classic Chuck Fin massive W

  • @farhaanahmed8924
    @farhaanahmed8924 Рік тому

    Thank you so much, my university lecturers and textbooks have a combined utility of 0.

  • @jodiancampbell3939
    @jodiancampbell3939 9 років тому +10

    Why did you differentiate with respect to X for du/dy? I thought it would have been .5y .5-1, with X held constant

    • @banstaman
      @banstaman 8 років тому +2

      Probably too late to know, but deriving it results in: x^.25 * .5y^.5-1, but you can move that all the way to the front of the equation, it won't make a difference. It's just much easier to work with that way.

    • @Emreznvlda
      @Emreznvlda 2 місяці тому

      @@banstaman never late man :d

  • @bethwelkimutai5026
    @bethwelkimutai5026 6 років тому +2

    Great video thank you for sharing this knowledge I can now better my economics grade

  • @pavanialahakoon6315
    @pavanialahakoon6315 2 роки тому +1

    Most important lesson.thank you soo much

  • @disintegratev6951
    @disintegratev6951 Рік тому

    really easy to understand, thank you! And some white noise for free :D

  • @marcusbowman6214
    @marcusbowman6214 3 роки тому +6

    Hi thanks for the great explanation ! I have a quick question. when you take the partial derivative with respect to x ,for example, why don’t you treat y as a constant which would equal 0.

    • @EconomicsinManyLessons
      @EconomicsinManyLessons  3 роки тому +6

      Example. Let U = XY + Y. Take Partial derivative of U with respect to X (we treat Y as a constant). For the sake of argument, say Y = 5 (a constant) and replace Y with 5 in the equation above, so U = 5X + 5. Take the derivative of this last equation wrt to X: dU/dX = 5 + 0 = 5. Now, replace 5 with Y, so dU/dX = Y and you get the correct partial derivative of the utility function with respect to X.

  • @piercebedell5923
    @piercebedell5923 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you, this was very helpful.

  • @patthazard6044
    @patthazard6044 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks for the heads up😪

  • @yayassanyang4516
    @yayassanyang4516 Рік тому +1

    I like the way you lecture

  • @gx1313131
    @gx1313131 8 років тому

    thank god, your video just saved me.

  • @oasisrocks
    @oasisrocks 3 роки тому

    Need help. Why didn't we multiply everything with 4 at 4:06

  • @bernardcotton721
    @bernardcotton721 7 років тому +3

    merci pour cette video cobb douglas utility function: it also works with 3 variables (private goods , leisure, public goods); see philip graves; merci à youtube !

  • @emmanuelroosevelt6840
    @emmanuelroosevelt6840 4 роки тому

    I'm so happy, you helped me so much..

  • @HiPh0Plover1
    @HiPh0Plover1 8 років тому +1

    error @ 4:31 4* .25x-.75y.5= x.25 and 4y.5 not just y .5

    • @jpratt8676
      @jpratt8676 8 років тому +2

      Happy Turtle The 4 is outside the fraction and it's implied that it is multiplying the whole thing but that is an astute observation

    • @oasisrocks
      @oasisrocks 3 роки тому

      @@jpratt8676 but he never actually multiplies with the 4 on the left side. My question is why doesn't cross multiplying not work.

  • @liviantus
    @liviantus 8 років тому +1

    thank youuuuuuuuuuuu your the best saved me thank you thank you can you do example like that on income and substitution effect

  • @collinskibet2992
    @collinskibet2992 4 роки тому

    Thank you 😊 you have helped me alot

  • @tomwebster7500
    @tomwebster7500 Рік тому

    Absolute legend!!!

  • @Ausiedundan
    @Ausiedundan 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much!!

  • @preciousntobeng328
    @preciousntobeng328 Рік тому

    Thank you so much 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼. ❤️

  • @dagmawiyohannes7405
    @dagmawiyohannes7405 4 роки тому

    Suppose a particular consumer has 8 birr to be spent on two goods, A and B. The unit price of good A is 2 birr and the unit price of B is 1 birr. The marginal utility (MU) she gets from consumption of the goods is given below. Quantity 1 36 30 2 24 22 3 20 16 4 18 12 5 16 10 6 10 4 A) Based on the cardinal analysis, what is the combination of the two goods that gives maximum utility to the consumer? B) What is the total utility at the utility maximization level?
    Expert's answer I need the answer pls

  • @enriquesanzposse6197
    @enriquesanzposse6197 9 років тому +1

    very useful, but from where did you got that cobb douglas equation, how do you calculate it?

    • @billyoung8118
      @billyoung8118 8 років тому +4

      I'm sure it is far too late for you to get this answer now, but I wanted to respond. The Cobb-Douglas equation is a really big deal in advanced economics classes. Its form is: Y=A*Labor^(beta)*Capital^(alpha). In this case, they changed the formula a bit to become U=X^a*Y^b (with a and b being constants). It has a lot of uses, for instance to show how to continue to grow a business when efficiency really can't be improved (machines and workers can only work so fast). There are entire books written about that formula and entire programs of study in masters degrees devoted to it. It is really not possible to go into enough detail here, as this formula is really the mac-daddy of economics equations.

    • @richardhufnagle5438
      @richardhufnagle5438 7 років тому

      how do you get the beta and alpha though still very confused on this equation.

    • @bernhardkoster3095
      @bernhardkoster3095 3 роки тому

      @@billyoung8118 Sorry but CD first semester and has nothing to do with advanced stuff. Its just the geometric mean, or you ask for a function with substitution elasticity of 1

  • @anndiaz-exposito3924
    @anndiaz-exposito3924 3 роки тому

    BETTER THAN THE TEXTBOOK

    • @bernhardkoster3095
      @bernhardkoster3095 3 роки тому

      No!!!! Because the why is missing! It is just stupid wicked calculation, with no deeper inside!

  • @eugeneokiri6617
    @eugeneokiri6617 3 роки тому

    awesome. thank you very much

  • @nikogg93
    @nikogg93 5 років тому +3

    Not a Cobb-Douglas, exponents must add to 1

    • @EconomicsinManyLessons
      @EconomicsinManyLessons  5 років тому +1

      The exponents do not need to sum to 1; each exponent only needs to be a positive constant.

    • @bernhardkoster3095
      @bernhardkoster3095 3 роки тому

      NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! utility is ordinal, therefore the exponents does not need to add up to 1!!! You Prof should have told you!

  • @bernhardkoster3095
    @bernhardkoster3095 3 роки тому

    Why you do not just say that p_y=2p_x and 0.5 the coefficient at x is twice 0.25 the coefficient of y and therefore you directly see, without any calculation by symmetry of the problem that y=x???

  • @tr3vorbwir343
    @tr3vorbwir343 3 роки тому

    Thank you so much man🇺🇬

  • @AlokJadva
    @AlokJadva Рік тому

    So you don’t need a Lagrangean for this ?

  • @jojazenande8852
    @jojazenande8852 5 років тому

    i dont understand why did we have to multiply by 4 and the exponents are not equal to 1

    • @EconomicsinManyLessons
      @EconomicsinManyLessons  5 років тому

      It's fine if the exponents do not sum to 1--the example is still in Cobb-Douglas format. I multiplied both sides by 4 to get rid of the 4 in the denominator on the right hand side of the equation; on the left hand side, 4 x 0.25 = 1.

  • @nuaminemoges6170
    @nuaminemoges6170 3 роки тому

    Very helpful

  • @SweetAlexMore
    @SweetAlexMore 8 років тому

    Can anyone help here?
    What if im given an income (m = 20), and prices of both goods (px = py = 1), and told the slope of a nicely convex indifference curve at bundle (10, 10) = -2. How do I work out the utility function, or the budget, or work out the best bundle she can buy?

    • @bernhardkoster3095
      @bernhardkoster3095 3 роки тому

      u=x^a*y^b m=p_x*x+p_y*y -> x*=[a/(a+b)]/p_x and x*=[b/(a+b)]/p_y this should have been told you in your first semester in microeconomics! Do not forget this!!!

  • @danuka9639
    @danuka9639 2 роки тому

    Superb 🔥

  • @kumaripooja9847
    @kumaripooja9847 4 роки тому

    Thank you very much

  • @ruchikumari6658
    @ruchikumari6658 3 роки тому +1

    Thank_You so much

  • @milanpal2634
    @milanpal2634 2 місяці тому

    MRS should be Y/2X

  • @age.b46
    @age.b46 3 роки тому

    please show me this solution U= -4Q2+80Q

  • @raihankhan4374
    @raihankhan4374 6 років тому +2

    OMG THANK YOU WHY TF does the textbook have like 50 pages just to explain these simple steps. I hope this is right tho sounds to good to be true

  • @rachelmace7683
    @rachelmace7683 7 років тому

    Thank you sooooo much

  • @Samirkoful
    @Samirkoful 6 років тому

    Thanks man!!!

  • @Yokchen
    @Yokchen 6 років тому

    You save me life

  • @migzwrld909
    @migzwrld909 3 роки тому

    thank you

  • @daydreamer2315
    @daydreamer2315 5 років тому

    simple. Thanks

  • @khayalamimahlalela7904
    @khayalamimahlalela7904 5 років тому

    Thanks man

  • @bianca83
    @bianca83 10 місяців тому

    I still do not understand why he differentiated with respect to x for du/dy. It makes this whole thing less intuitive to follow.

  • @joetom1023
    @joetom1023 2 роки тому

    Can i share a question and you do it for me

  • @quanvu2100
    @quanvu2100 8 років тому

    thank you so much yes yes yes

  • @thekayespace
    @thekayespace 4 роки тому

    Hi! why is it -.75?

    • @EconomicsinManyLessons
      @EconomicsinManyLessons  4 роки тому +1

      The exponent on the X variable after the derivative is X^(0.25 - 1), which simplifies to X^(-0.75)

    • @thekayespace
      @thekayespace 4 роки тому

      Thank you. Also, this video really helps me. ❤️

  • @simonblay773
    @simonblay773 5 років тому +1

    This solution looks a little confusing. COBB DOUGLAS WITH THE EXPONENTS NOT UP TO 1.

    • @EconomicsinManyLessons
      @EconomicsinManyLessons  5 років тому +1

      There is no requirement for the exponents on a Cobb-Douglas function to sum to 1. The exponents only need to be positive.

    • @bernhardkoster3095
      @bernhardkoster3095 3 роки тому

      do you know the difference between cardinality und ordinality look it up!

  • @taqi7109
    @taqi7109 Рік тому +1

    I love you from the bottom of Mariana Trench

  • @avinashkour9966
    @avinashkour9966 5 років тому

    Gud explain sir .....👍thnx

  • @edgarallanpoe8309
    @edgarallanpoe8309 5 років тому

    thanks lad

  • @johniechronicles3297
    @johniechronicles3297 3 роки тому +1

    Just saved a brother

  • @impolitikful
    @impolitikful 6 років тому

    I thought U = square of x*y ?

    • @EconomicsinManyLessons
      @EconomicsinManyLessons  6 років тому

      A utility function can take on many different forms. U = square root of X*Y is just another example of a Cobb-Douglas utility function. The general Cobb-Douglas form can be written as U = (X^a)(Y^b).

    • @impolitikful
      @impolitikful 6 років тому

      thanks

  • @betitg8681
    @betitg8681 Рік тому

    Tnxs🙏🙏

  • @ellykalchenko323
    @ellykalchenko323 5 років тому

    i love you) thank you

  • @bonangmafokate9922
    @bonangmafokate9922 8 років тому +1

    Thanks bra

  • @lucsolberg8466
    @lucsolberg8466 5 років тому

    SAVIOR!