great observations. mitchell was in full control, no smears just every stroke was controlled layering of the materials on each other. the big difference between her twombly and pollock. pollock refined his insecurity into a genious act of revolutionary paintings by freeing the material in its last step on the canvas
Joan s paintings pulled you in. They were never boring and never repetitive. Stanley’s paintings are great but his vocabulary is limited. It repeats itself a bit too much.
Just because abstract art doesn't appeal to you or make you feel anything doesn't make it bad or insignificant & certainly not a con. Most artists never see a penny for their work; it's about expressing feelings in a visual language. People either relate to it or they don't
More Stanley! Joan Mitchell is amazing. This is brilliant and makes me want to paint all day!
I could listen to Stanley talk all day!! Plus, he is a great artist. Thanks so much for posting this!! USA
Yeah, he really hit the nail on the head describing her work, could not have said it better. Right on. 👍
Just absolutely amazing, can’t stop watching it!!
Simply amazing! Thank you
Stanley nailed it. Said it in three words what Joan was all about.
LOVE, Mitchell, and Whitney two of my favorite painters!
She knew what She wanted out of her Life Thank You Stanley Whitney
Alert Awake Aware beautiful
this is gold!
Fantastic!
I like Joan Mitchell because she makes me feel like I could be a good painter
Billy b in your heart You are ThE Best Painter period
Rhythm & Drama !
great observations. mitchell was in full control, no smears just every stroke was controlled layering of the materials on each other. the big difference between her twombly and pollock. pollock refined his insecurity into a genious act of revolutionary paintings by freeing the material in its last step on the canvas
yes - exactly - thank you!
This is great
Perfectly good starts. Again and again, repeatedly. But as soon as she's about to get somewhere, she stops.
Joan s paintings pulled you in. They were never boring and never repetitive. Stanley’s paintings are great but his vocabulary is limited. It repeats itself a bit too much.
Give me Boucher and Fragonard 🤟😆🤘🤠😈🍄😛🧇🥓🍒🥞🤷🏾♂️
and give me good LIFE
Greatest con in history, most abstract painting. Who ya know and how many socialites do they know lol.
Just because abstract art doesn't appeal to you or make you feel anything doesn't make it bad or insignificant & certainly not a con. Most artists never see a penny for their work; it's about expressing feelings in a visual language. People either relate to it or they don't