Hi I have a discussion, I agree with your step that the idea of using the Multiphase model is near to the real condition, the primary flow will suck the secondary flow which normally is a different type of fluid but, in a term of high velocity in the nozzle exit (exp mach 4) shouldn't we use density-based model? but the problem when we choose density-based model is we can't click the multiphase, the only option we have is wet steam thanks -Rahadyan
the problem is a little different since the liquid phase is entered the domain and is different from the wet steam model. you can mail us for more consideration. info@mr-cfd.com
Hi I have a discussion, I agree with your step that the idea of using the Multiphase model is near to the real condition, the primary flow will suck the secondary flow which normally is a different type of fluid
but, in a term of high velocity in the nozzle exit (exp mach 4) shouldn't we use density-based model?
but the problem when we choose density-based model is we can't click the multiphase, the only option we have is wet steam
thanks
-Rahadyan
the problem is a little different since the liquid phase is entered the domain and is different from the wet steam model. you can mail us for more consideration. info@mr-cfd.com