Heavily Upgraded 2008 Cessna 182 Skylane TC

Поділитися
Вставка

КОМЕНТАРІ • 102

  • @kylemohundro4488
    @kylemohundro4488 2 роки тому +6

    Hey Rich, I'm new to aviation and am a massive fan of your channel! Easily my favorite aviation channel on youtube, possibly my favorite channel all together. Just wanted to drop a comment and say thanks man.

    • @FlyingwithRich
      @FlyingwithRich  2 роки тому +3

      Thanks for message Kyle - I appreciate it and glad you like the videos. Let me know if you ever make it out to CA!

  • @youtoober808
    @youtoober808 3 місяці тому +1

    182 was always my favorite airplane since I was a kid. I fly RC planes and the 182 is my favorite model.

  • @matthumphrey8774
    @matthumphrey8774 Рік тому +2

    I love the Cessna Skylane

  • @j.gregory5669
    @j.gregory5669 2 роки тому +3

    wow, what a beauty. Somene is going to love this plane. Another great video!

  • @Factory400
    @Factory400 2 роки тому +1

    I had an '04 and really loved it. My main use was a utility aircraft that allowed me to move high-value equipment for my business.
    Not exactly a thrill ride....but sooooo useful. My business rarely told a customer 'no' when I had this.

    • @FlyingwithRich
      @FlyingwithRich  2 роки тому +2

      Nice use of a 182 - tough to beat! Thanks for watching.

  • @spencerneilsen7047
    @spencerneilsen7047 2 роки тому

    I’m loving the new intro! Great video per usual 👍😎

  • @mattd4616
    @mattd4616 2 роки тому +2

    Keep ‘em coming Rich👍

  • @Hossman757
    @Hossman757 2 роки тому

    That landing was butter. Nothing like flying at dusk in calm skies. Great flight Rich.

  • @spiro5327
    @spiro5327 2 роки тому

    Will always be a great allrounder. Thanks Rich

  • @kinch613
    @kinch613 2 роки тому

    Beautiful pristine Cessna. Thats not gonna be lonely long as the song goes!

    • @FlyingwithRich
      @FlyingwithRich  2 роки тому

      I think you are right! Thanks for watching!

  • @beaufitz8993
    @beaufitz8993 2 роки тому

    Great job Rich!

  • @cabinvibenet5777
    @cabinvibenet5777 2 роки тому +1

    New sub! Liked 🐸🙏🙂🙂✌️😊

  • @rws0010
    @rws0010 2 роки тому

    Nice job Rich as always

  • @CarlosRamos-xm3hl
    @CarlosRamos-xm3hl 2 роки тому +1

    Very nice. We had a 182Q. Great plane overall.

    • @FlyingwithRich
      @FlyingwithRich  2 роки тому +2

      Love all the 182s. We might have a 1960 182C coming in - looking forward to seeing/flying it!

  • @NotTelling51
    @NotTelling51 2 роки тому +1

    Beautiful, great plane

  • @tj-mo8yl
    @tj-mo8yl 2 роки тому

    Great stuff Rich thanks. Oh by the way can you maybe do some more Phenom stuff 300 or 100 . I loved the piece you did with John and his 300 Phenom. I have watched nearly all of your videos, some of them more than once.

    • @FlyingwithRich
      @FlyingwithRich  2 роки тому

      Thanks. Planning on another 300 video soon.

  • @j.t.cooper2963
    @j.t.cooper2963 2 роки тому

    👍🏻😎 Another one of my favorites from my flight line tech days at Ryan Aviation back in the mid 80's.

  • @edumunoz3175
    @edumunoz3175 Рік тому

    Excellent ATC.

  • @enricodigenova8112
    @enricodigenova8112 2 роки тому

    Great video mate and nice plane 👍👍

  • @garylucas6511
    @garylucas6511 2 роки тому

    Tower at end of flight seemed to be enjoying his call-outs

  • @martinporter6478
    @martinporter6478 2 роки тому +1

    Looking at the power settings you were flying it at, it seems a bit slow for a 182T. Indicated 124-126kt. Ours cruise at solid 140kt just under the yellow arc. I wonder if VGs are slowing her down?

    • @FlyingwithRich
      @FlyingwithRich  2 роки тому +2

      Honestly - I thought the same thing but we were low so not sure. I have flown that same one at 7500’ and the speeds were normal. Thanks for the message.

    • @anthonyrstrawbridge
      @anthonyrstrawbridge Рік тому

      ☝️🤔

  • @barryweigle1356
    @barryweigle1356 2 роки тому +1

    I’ll talk to my son in law he and my daughter need this beauty.

  • @GooberPilot
    @GooberPilot Рік тому

    When you start talking about the history of the 182 2:23 you’re talking to a GoPro but what are you using to mount it like that? I’m assuming it’s nothing permanent since you move from plane to plane.

  • @paulo7200
    @paulo7200 2 роки тому

    Seems close in price to new for 14 years old. At least you're not going Full CarMax and asking MORE than new! Thanks for the cool vid and SoCal scenery.

  • @omarjunior4603
    @omarjunior4603 Місяць тому

    i also like the 172 model

  • @Dunwyche
    @Dunwyche 10 місяців тому

    Yeah!

  • @williamkennedy2069
    @williamkennedy2069 2 роки тому +1

    Does this engine have lower compression ratio because of the turbo? Or is it regular in the turbo system is actually a turbo normalizer?

  • @ronconrad3507
    @ronconrad3507 2 роки тому

    Bet it gets bought from Florida. Good luck Rich your the best.

  • @mustang1191
    @mustang1191 2 роки тому

    Yeah the 182 is a very appealing aircraft. Didn’t realize production numbers were so low.

    • @FlyingwithRich
      @FlyingwithRich  2 роки тому +2

      Sad but true, Cessna/Textron 182T deliveries - 33 in 2019, 27 in 2020, and 38 last year!

  • @bernardanderson3758
    @bernardanderson3758 2 роки тому +1

    Rich you forgot to give me a call on this flight 😀

  • @appomattoxross6751
    @appomattoxross6751 Рік тому

    Also, in the early 1980s, product liability was a major legal factor for Cessna shutting down the single engine production.

  • @michaelschiralli8523
    @michaelschiralli8523 2 роки тому

    I really enjoy your channel! I am new to aviation and have learned a lot about various planes and avionics thanks to the great information you provide in your videos. I am taking my first exploratory flight in a couple of weeks and I am so excited for it! :-)

  • @TOB-uk2xy
    @TOB-uk2xy 2 роки тому

    Rich - other than the avionics updates, do you see many noticeable updates in these 182’s throughout the years. i.e. Is a 2016 182 almost the same as a 2021 182 except for the G1000 internals?

    • @FlyingwithRich
      @FlyingwithRich  2 роки тому +1

      Correct - 2007 and newer are really the same all the way up to 2022. They did go to newer 3 in 1 standby electronic flight instruments but that’s upgradable (same with NXI). Thanks for watching!

  • @williamkennedy2069
    @williamkennedy2069 2 роки тому +4

    Could we get an STC which would allow us to run this engine at full RPM? 2700rpm, and if so would it make $285 horsepower or with this one be $310 horsepower? I hate that they've detuned this engine to make such little horsepower. Every time I watch a video where they have put the 300 horsepower IO 550 everybody says that is the right amount of horsepower for that airplane. The same like coming engine can make 310 horsepower, why don't they just put that in there? Since this engine is bent detuned can we just run into 2400 RPM all day long?

    • @FlyingwithRich
      @FlyingwithRich  2 роки тому +3

      As far as I know, no way to crank up the HP on the 540s in the newer 182s. I think there is an STC for a 260HP 540, but I believe a different variant and not turning up RPM. Thanks for watching!

  • @kevinbarry71
    @kevinbarry71 2 роки тому +1

    Personally, brand new I think I would prefer a 206

  • @Parr4theCourse
    @Parr4theCourse 2 роки тому

    Throttle & Mixture in during fuel prime, or was that a hot start?

    • @FlyingwithRich
      @FlyingwithRich  2 роки тому

      I prime them cold with throttle all the way in - fuel flows much more rapidly, less use on the pump/battery was always my thinking - probably splitting hairs though!

    • @Parr4theCourse
      @Parr4theCourse 2 роки тому

      @@FlyingwithRich Makes sense . . . Six of one . . . 1/2 dozen of the other - HA!

  • @egreens8512
    @egreens8512 2 роки тому +1

    Very nice we used to rent one those w/pilot $68 wet out of Bermuda Dunes from their flying club stable , Pilot David Cheshire fun stuff priceless , thanks Rich OCR

  • @JustaPilot1
    @JustaPilot1 2 роки тому

    The last 182 I flew was a 74 P model. Are they still as nose heavy in the 08 model?

    • @FlyingwithRich
      @FlyingwithRich  2 роки тому

      Feels very similar to the earlier 182s. Thanks for watching!

  • @mamulcahy
    @mamulcahy 2 роки тому

    I would love to have a 182T, but my wife has one leg and the cockpit climb is a challenge.

  • @eglide73
    @eglide73 2 роки тому

    Wow, why the need after all these years for full span VGs???

    • @FlyingwithRich
      @FlyingwithRich  2 роки тому +1

      Slower stall speed than clean wing. I agree - how much slower do you need to go in a Skylane, but pretty cheap upgrade, and makes a difference!

    • @415sbaird
      @415sbaird 2 роки тому

      I have VGs on my 2004 C-T182T & notice that power on stalls are difficult to demo because of a much lower stall speed. Prob best feature of the VG is the added safety margin for low level maneuvering like in the traffic patterns.

    • @FlyingwithRich
      @FlyingwithRich  2 роки тому

      Agree. Thanks for watching!

    • @FlyingwithRich
      @FlyingwithRich  2 роки тому

      Nice. I agree. Thanks for watching!

  • @louissanderson719
    @louissanderson719 2 роки тому +1

    Lovely aircraft! I bet that NXI upgrade cost a lot 😂

  • @bernardanderson3758
    @bernardanderson3758 2 роки тому +1

    I’m not to excited with what the information on the feds are raising up the interest rate again Rich and if it happens we will see prices on aircraft drop tremendously but overall there are still buyers for these T 182T and the new 172 price of 2022 is at $600K

  • @ronconrad3507
    @ronconrad3507 2 роки тому

    My Dad never had Turbos is in our planes. To much trouble back then he said.

    • @FlyingwithRich
      @FlyingwithRich  2 роки тому +2

      They used to bolt turbo chargers on NA engines and has some issues. The news are turbo charged out of the box automatic wastegates, and de-rated so pretty solid engines. Thanks for watching!

    • @williamkennedy2069
      @williamkennedy2069 2 роки тому +1

      @@FlyingwithRich you don't really benefit from the turbos until you get like 10,000 ft or more, correct? So for most people that stay under $10,000 you'd be better off just getting a bigger motor, old playing with the io 550. Do you agree?

    • @FlyingwithRich
      @FlyingwithRich  2 роки тому +1

      Tough call - benefits to both the 550 upgrade (you can’t do that on 182T), and the stock TIO 540. I like turbo charged airplanes, and you are correct on paying off at higher altitudes. Also benefit on take off performance at high density altitude airports. I really like both options so I guess really depends on where you are operating and budget. Thanks for the message.

    • @ronconrad3507
      @ronconrad3507 2 роки тому

      @@FlyingwithRich I Believe the DC7s were Turbo Supercharger and intercooled monster's.

    • @FlyingwithRich
      @FlyingwithRich  2 роки тому

      Correct!

  • @hawkdsl
    @hawkdsl 2 роки тому

    I think it goes without saying that the high wing Cessna's are the aviation equivalent of cardboard.

  • @Mr5875874
    @Mr5875874 11 місяців тому

    625,000 for a 2008. Or 725,000 for a new one. New one every time

    • @FlyingwithRich
      @FlyingwithRich  11 місяців тому

      I would buy a new too at $725k , but don’t that’s possible.

  • @MichaelVanHeemst
    @MichaelVanHeemst 2 роки тому

    Too bad these things have only a 950lb useful load. The R models would have close to 1200lb useful load with the same exact wing…

  • @renoguy25
    @renoguy25 2 роки тому

    Morning Rich ,
    Nice plane ... you wouldn't know what this coming weeks winning lottery numbers are ? ( you can PM me ...I promise not to tell anyone else 🙂 ) And I come see you pronto

  • @williamkennedy2069
    @williamkennedy2069 2 роки тому +1

    Rpm"S". LOL

    • @FlyingwithRich
      @FlyingwithRich  2 роки тому +1

      Are you the one who calls me out on RPMs?

    • @williamkennedy2069
      @williamkennedy2069 2 роки тому +1

      @@FlyingwithRich no, this video was the first time I've ever heard that it was a problem, I say it just like you say it

    • @FlyingwithRich
      @FlyingwithRich  2 роки тому +1

      Somebody always calls that out saying it’s Revolutions per minute so you don’t add the s on the acronym. Tough habit to break, and what about when talking about a twin!

    • @williamkennedy2069
      @williamkennedy2069 2 роки тому +1

      @@FlyingwithRich too funny

  • @billyrogers7499
    @billyrogers7499 2 роки тому

    Looked at this plane a year and 200k ago … nice bird, but the priciest out there

  • @arip9234
    @arip9234 Рік тому

    Great airplane but at that price range, not attainable for most people.

  • @arip9234
    @arip9234 Рік тому

    Great airplane but at that price range, not attainable for most people.