Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

Porsche 996 911 Buyer's Guide - 1999-2005 (Models, Engines, Suspension, Brakes, Options, & More)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 сер 2024
  • ►The Porsche 996 911 is one of the most talked-about models ever produced by Porsche for quite a few reasons, some good, some bad, some valid, some not. Perhaps its most significant claim to fame is that it represents the cheapest way for regular car enthusiasts to buy their dream car. It's the dream, the attainable reality, the *gasp*, "poor man's Porsche 911." That tired phrase has been repeated often, but is there such a thing?
    In our first Buyer's Guide featuring the FCP Euro Proving Grounds at Lime Rock Park, we demystify the monumental list of models, trims, and all the options of the Porsche 996 911. With that, we also show you precisely what you can expect and what to look out for before shopping for your first 996, and what to do once you own one.
    Follow along as Christian Schaefer, FCP Euro's Staff Writer and resident Porsche aficionado, teaches us everything we need to know about the Porsche 996 911.
    If you want to learn more about the Porsche 996, you can read the full Buyer's Guide on our blog here: blog.fcpeuro.c...
    Or, you can visit: info.fcpeuro.c...
    00:00 - Intro
    00:59 - Model Breakdown
    02:14 - Competition
    02:57 - Model differences
    06:31 - Engines
    09:15 - Transmission
    11:10 - Suspension
    12:55 - Brakes
    14:04 - Interior
    15:07 - Wrap-Up
    SUBSCRIBE: www.youtube.co...
    Get free parts from FCP Euro:
    www.fcpeuro.co...
    Follow FCP Euro on:
    / fcpeuro
    / fcpeuro
    / fcpeuro
    www.fcpeuro.com/

КОМЕНТАРІ • 162

  • @georgem5589
    @georgem5589 2 роки тому +72

    1999 996 is one of the nicest motor vehicle designs ever penned. Dual row bearing was strong. Only 300hp sub 3k lb. 911 ever made.

    • @fcpeuro
      @fcpeuro  2 роки тому +7

      We certainly like it!

    • @paulbellas8797
      @paulbellas8797 2 роки тому +1

      Agree/. 996.2 headlights always looked forced to me. Also, taco area kit really suited the style of the car.

  • @edd2184
    @edd2184 2 роки тому +12

    Don't let the IMS issue scare you, I truly believe, the cars that were affected have already sorted themselves out of existence (almost 20 years has went by). I truly believe IMS failure is more prone to happen in the cars that were casually driven and did not go through the entire rev range. Cars that basically spent their entire lives and chilling at 3K RPM, going back and forth to the office. So if you do find a well-maintained higher mileage 996 you're probably safe.
    That being said the early models do have a dual row IMS and prices are a little hot right now so I would let the market cool down a little bit.

  • @mgmoore2
    @mgmoore2 2 роки тому +31

    Great video! I absolutely love my '99 996.1 C2. Great, pure driving experience. 300 HP, less than 3K lbs, and no electronic nannies to get in the way of your fun. Mine has just over 100K miles, still runs like a champ, and pulls hard all day long!

  • @pattyjay9999
    @pattyjay9999 2 роки тому +40

    Dude, the most detailed and comprehensive review I’ve ever seen thank you👍🏾

    • @fcpeuro
      @fcpeuro  2 роки тому +2

      Glad you approve Patty jay!

    • @pattyjay9999
      @pattyjay9999 2 роки тому

      @@fcpeuro Now I just have to find a Porsche that I can afford 😜

    • @amauri_dleon7726
      @amauri_dleon7726 2 роки тому

      True

  • @leonlipinski583
    @leonlipinski583 2 роки тому +12

    I love my 996 4S. I think it is the best looking 996

  • @fsb6406
    @fsb6406 Рік тому +1

    Love my factory original 2001 996 C4. Artic silver, full boxster red interior, sunroof and 18"wheels. 190.000kms and still drives like back in 2001. I am the second owner, the previous owner was my dad. Never had any problems. Normal maintenance (oil , filters and brakepads... basically) plus some repairs (headlight washers, headlight switch, sunroof motor, ignition switch and one clutch). All repairs and 80% of the maintenance done at Porsche. Hopefully my son will enjoy it as well. Of course I expect some things to be replaced or repaired in a 20+ years old car but so far it's been a extremely reliable car.

  • @asimpleton2.0
    @asimpleton2.0 Рік тому +2

    This kid was conceived born and raised by Porsche cars !!! 🤯 Kudos to you guy 🙌🔥🙌

  • @yongkim777
    @yongkim777 Рік тому +2

    Just bought a 2001 Carerra 4 with 38k miles. Its been garaged its whole life and in
    like new condition. I did tune it up & put new tires on it as the date code on the tires
    were early 2013. The IMS bearing is next and I'm loving it. Had a 1977 911S that I just
    loved but was offered a deal I couldn't refuse. Never thought I would own another😁

  • @69BigLou
    @69BigLou 2 роки тому +5

    You werent kidding when you said you were a Porsche nerd! Awesome. Very informative.

    • @fcpeuro
      @fcpeuro  2 роки тому +1

      He can be a bit much... always throwing Porsche knowledge at us everyday! Glad you found it informative Luis!

  • @fredvandevelde4576
    @fredvandevelde4576 2 роки тому +4

    Good review, owned a 2003 Carrera for 15 years, had the IMS after market bearing upgraded at 100,000km 8 years ago - original was in perfect condition, used as a daily driver. Reliable easy to drive and my wife loves driving it.

    • @fcpeuro
      @fcpeuro  2 роки тому

      Thanks for sharing!

  • @karlberneli4602
    @karlberneli4602 2 роки тому +9

    I'm in the market for a 996.2 so this was an excellent review. Found one with the IMS-bearing and RMS-seal just fixed.
    Other than that it seems that the 996 is a pretty solid car.

  • @MiamiViceStyle
    @MiamiViceStyle 2 роки тому +3

    the 996 is so underrated

  • @RayMelville
    @RayMelville 2 роки тому +18

    Missing the 40 Jahre in the review is like missing the M model in a BMW review

    • @Bebopin-69
      @Bebopin-69 2 роки тому +1

      Yes, 345hp and limited slip. This one is the most desirable in the 996 range IMO.

    • @RayMelville
      @RayMelville 2 роки тому +1

      @@Bebopin-69 Yes, but it seems that most of those not familiar with the specifics and details of the 996 models are more attracted by the wide rear end of the C4S despite it having 25 hp less, 200 lbs heavier and lacking the driving characteristics of a narrow body RWD that gave 911 its unique driving experience.

    • @adampeirce3297
      @adampeirce3297 Рік тому

      I kept waiting for them to talk about it. There was a 40 Jahre in the video that they never even mentioned. It is the hidden secret of the 996 range and I guess that FCP Euro is trying to keep it that way.

    • @dardog7734
      @dardog7734 Рік тому

      It’s not really is it

  • @richardclegg5853
    @richardclegg5853 2 роки тому

    Bought my very clean, 70k 996 a couple months ago, even though I had to replace water pump almost immediately, couldn't be happier... what a car

  • @alexanderkho1482
    @alexanderkho1482 2 роки тому +3

    missing the 996.1 GT3 and the 996.2 GT3RS, nicely detailed video.

    • @michalgondolewski8709
      @michalgondolewski8709 2 роки тому

      I noticed that as well. I think it’s because this is an American review, and those two cars were not available in the US. Still would have been nice to mention them.

  • @kdao1007
    @kdao1007 Рік тому +1

    Outstanding definition to the line up for this era. Enjoyed it. I had 2002 911Turbo - Manual. Was a fun 911.

  • @henryatkinson1479
    @henryatkinson1479 2 роки тому +7

    Love my 1999 996. Fantastic car. M030, sport seats LSD, and hollow spokes are great options. Really tempted to retrofit the X51 package if I ever need the motor rebuilt.

    • @fcpeuro
      @fcpeuro  2 роки тому +1

      That sounds like a great spec!

    • @paulbellas8797
      @paulbellas8797 2 роки тому +1

      Nice to have an lsd. Lucky!

    • @LetsDIYIt
      @LetsDIYIt Рік тому +1

      My 996.2 is a C4 Cab with factory X51 package. It really pulls well in the higher rpm range (like all Porsches). That little extra power though is nice for sure. Funny thing, when I bought the car, I didn't know it was an X51 car. Was a nice surprise when pulled the build sheet and realized the intake manifold was aluminum. In my dark garage when I looked at first it actually looked black to me.

  • @igglybiggly6951
    @igglybiggly6951 2 роки тому

    Love my 2000 996.1 tiptronic.....105,000 miles with original IMS....been a great coupe

  • @cabbys
    @cabbys 2 роки тому +5

    This is a great video and review of the 996 line. Thanks. I enjoyed it very much. What’s the reason reviewers always leave out the X50 and X51 spec cars? These are rare and special performance Porsches. Their production and performance numbers and overall values are rarely discussed. I own a 2004 C4S with the X51 package and it sits in a very sweet spot between the C4S and GT3. It’s a great performer on the street and on the track. Great everyday driver. It looks and sounds great and pulls all day long. It’s a fun car to drive without the track focused harshness of the terrific GT3. Subbed and looking forward to more great videos.

  • @genuineapbt6690
    @genuineapbt6690 Рік тому +1

    I loved the video. Good attention to detail. But you missed the 911 Turbo S for 2005. In my opinion, definitely worth including.

  • @FarseSpludeheim
    @FarseSpludeheim 2 роки тому +2

    Best vid on the 996 yet. Thanks for doing this!

    • @fcpeuro
      @fcpeuro  2 роки тому

      Glad we can do the chassis justice!

  • @captaincoyote1792
    @captaincoyote1792 6 місяців тому

    Excwllent review, young man…..well done! I’m in my late 60s….retired Navy, retired Federal LEO. I’m obviously in my “swan years” phase….I’m a happy owner I of a pristine 944s2 cabriolet. It gets looks and comments EVERYWHERE we go. Tail of the Dragon….up and down the Outer Banks….the Kancamangus Highway up through the Whites, the Green Mountains and back down through the Appalachians. She was my “gift to me” the year I turned 50 and promoted to O6 Captain. But I’ve always had a “green eye” on a 911. Excellent review on the 996 series…..but now I’m on the lookout for an appropriately priced 997 targa or cabriolet. I’ve got to first sell the 944: sell my Tacoma truck…….maybe restore my Jeep TJ (for crappy weather)….then I’ll pull the trigger! Again, Bravo-Zulu, well done!

  • @randallbutler2736
    @randallbutler2736 5 місяців тому

    Very well done sir. I’m in the process of buying my first Porsche and one that I can afford without my wife moving all of my clothes to the barn.
    It’s a ‘99 convertible.

  • @carrelatedshorts5937
    @carrelatedshorts5937 2 роки тому +3

    Very informative & useful.
    Thank you.
    All the best!

    • @fcpeuro
      @fcpeuro  2 роки тому

      Our pleasure !

  • @cheeeses
    @cheeeses 2 роки тому +4

    thanx for this great video! would love to see the same of the 997 line-up. greetings from europe, switzerland ;-)

    • @fcpeuro
      @fcpeuro  2 роки тому +1

      997 Buyer's Guide is coming next! We filmed it the same day as this one. Stay tuned and thanks for watching!

  • @pulehushortribs157
    @pulehushortribs157 2 місяці тому

    Enjoyable and Informative, Thank You✌❤🤗

  • @yurgle-shmurgle
    @yurgle-shmurgle Рік тому

    As a someone who is something i can honestly say that someday, something else will be somewhere

  • @the_canyon_carver
    @the_canyon_carver 2 роки тому +45

    Unfortunately, you've really got it backwards. 996.2s are a lot more prone to bore scoring and IMS issues. As others have said vehicles produced in early 1998 were far superior to later Carreras for a lot of reasons. Dual row ims, throttle cable, lightest weight, better interior plastics, etc.

    • @Joey856721
      @Joey856721 2 роки тому +2

      This only applies to Carreras though right?

    • @gregs8685
      @gregs8685 2 роки тому +6

      Far superior? 996.1 single row IMSB cars are just as vulnerable to failure as 996.2 and also have D chunk issues. Yes 996.1 cars are marginally lighter but the 3.6L power and torque make them just as great to to drive plus they are significantly quicker and faster. The 996.2 got improved interior materials so not sure where you’re coming up with the interior comment.

    • @JR_harlow
      @JR_harlow 2 роки тому +3

      I think the fail rate for those bearings was something like 5% very low. The big scare no one is really talking about is COLD WEATHER conditions and whatever it does to the cheaper engine blocks that porsche was using during this era, less nickel in the cast and something to do with cold weather has made for a horrendous combination.. any 996 or 997 as far as I'm concerned that has came from northern America is a no go. Bore scoring is almost inevitable.. and the scoring will lead to combustion/piston failure

    • @the_canyon_carver
      @the_canyon_carver 2 роки тому +2

      @@JR_harlow you're spot on. I have a 5/98 build date 996.1. I believe this motor is less prone to bore scoring (socal car) but who really knows.

    • @steverush8362
      @steverush8362 Рік тому +2

      Evan yes less than 1% FOR 98 & 99..half way thru 2000...and onwards...8% fail

  • @paulbellas8797
    @paulbellas8797 2 роки тому +3

    The 996.2 actuAlly is more prone to bore scoring and ISM issues than the 996.1. This has is because the 996.2 had a single row IMS and the larger bore put more heat and pressure the cylinder walls. Bank two more prone to scoring because of how oil flows through the motor.

  • @ryanpatterson9526
    @ryanpatterson9526 7 місяців тому

    I wish we still had those prices!

  • @tr7tr755
    @tr7tr755 2 роки тому +4

    Many thanks for this perfect revue, really clear and helpful. I got a 996.I coupe and had already 2 996 4S Cabrio….fantastic cars and never a problem with IMS etc. Cheers from Switzerland 🇨🇭

  • @rpm-qv7rw
    @rpm-qv7rw 2 роки тому +8

    The GT3 started with the 996.1 and not 996.2.

  • @antonyweisstock7167
    @antonyweisstock7167 2 роки тому +2

    I enjoyed your video, but I was waiting to hear about the 996 turbo S. I have a 2005 996 turbo S and I wanted to hear about how this car compared to the others in your lineup.
    I am slowly discovering some of the unique features of this car, but I would like to learn more! Any more info would be appreciated! Thank you! :)
    Tony

  • @techdada
    @techdada 2 роки тому +1

    Great comprehensive review! Also want to mention the Aerokit package and some had the very low take rate sunroof delete option.

  • @tu_alum5619
    @tu_alum5619 2 роки тому

    Nice video and a great job of making a scripted presentation really interesting to listen to - kept the subject focused and maintained a momentum to the delivery.

  • @996Revival
    @996Revival 2 роки тому +1

    Nicely done!

  • @lagerace227
    @lagerace227 2 роки тому +4

    Great review.
    Defiantly on my radar. oooh that flat 6 sound. Been driving a friends '02 Boxster S a few times.
    Love my Golf R and what it can do but there's nothing like getting into a true dedicated sports car.
    Especially a Porsche.

  • @JoshColon264
    @JoshColon264 2 роки тому +1

    Great job Christian 🙌

  • @gregs8685
    @gregs8685 2 роки тому

    Great video, although I would not track any 996 or 997.1 (excluding Mezger engined GT3, GT2 and turbos) unless it has an aftermarket deep oil pan with baffle. Even with this mod the M96/M97 engines are fragile compared to previous 911 engines. *The 2001 turbo is actually a 996.1 car.
    X51 power kit was an option for all 996.2 Carreras (and standard on the 49th Anniversary Editions) and made 345 hp.
    The x50 was an optional power kit for the turbo and made around 450 hp, same engine was standard on the 2005 996.2 Turbo S. Manual x50 and Turbo S cars also came with a steel gears synchros instead of brass for the first 2 gears IIRC.

  • @mry82
    @mry82 2 роки тому

    Well done, I like the candid moment left in at the end.

  • @stoss-11
    @stoss-11 2 роки тому +1

    You guys should do this for BMW M's F8x Generation and E46 Generation!!!

  • @bcut
    @bcut Рік тому

    This was fantastic! I appreciate this so much. thank you!! :)

  • @hugohugo2832
    @hugohugo2832 2 роки тому

    I had a 1997 996.1 back in the day two years earlier than your stated start date. Great car too. I bought an 03 c4s 996.2 which was not as good to replace it

  • @bluezklewz8351
    @bluezklewz8351 2 роки тому +3

    Definitely need a 997 version

    • @fcpeuro
      @fcpeuro  2 роки тому +1

      It's being edited as we type this 🙂

    • @9jfd1
      @9jfd1 2 роки тому

      Just cover up the headlights to make them round and upgrade the tail lights, my porsche mechanic thought my 996 was a 997 first time he saw it, lol.....

    • @robinoconnor1203
      @robinoconnor1203 2 роки тому +1

      If you are going to buy a 997 get a gen2, the gen1 had similar engine issues to the 996, in some cases they were even worse.

    • @larshenssen335
      @larshenssen335 2 роки тому +1

      @@robinoconnor1203 Yeah. Among many other issues, mine had a failed cylinder coating after just 90k km. Needed a new block. The 3.8l S-version is beyond reasonable wall sizes.
      Worst piece of German engineering ever made (and I am a German engineer...).

  • @Indian-313
    @Indian-313 2 роки тому +1

    Very nicely done 👍👍

  • @henryw5762
    @henryw5762 Рік тому

    Great descriptions and info. Ty

  • @RichardSiegel-yj8hn
    @RichardSiegel-yj8hn 4 місяці тому +1

    What about the 40 year anniversary model. The best of all 996s

  • @luissantamarina7579
    @luissantamarina7579 2 роки тому

    Outstanding review. Thank you

  • @rafgomez333
    @rafgomez333 2 роки тому

    Great video. Thanks so much!

  • @nicogarbella
    @nicogarbella 2 роки тому +2

    Love the videos! Can u go over the 996 charging cable, alternator, and starter service? A lot of 996 have bad starts which is related to this cable. Thanks :)

    • @fcpeuro
      @fcpeuro  2 роки тому +2

      Thank you, we will add it to our list!

  • @adampeirce3297
    @adampeirce3297 Рік тому

    Good video, shame you didn't talk about the 40 Jahre that you show in the video. X51, M030 and mechanical limited slip in a narrow body that weighs under 3,000lbs.

  • @ahemgee9542
    @ahemgee9542 Рік тому

    Love my 2002 C4S Manual.

  • @bombardierboerboels
    @bombardierboerboels 2 роки тому

    Fantastic video thank you

  • @john7643
    @john7643 Рік тому

    Correction ! 2001 models of the carrera 4 can be a mix of either gen 1 or gen 2 ! I’ve found this out because my car might have one of either ims bearings, they it depends on the month it was built !

  • @seniorscientist590
    @seniorscientist590 Рік тому

    That was a lot of info, great job!

    • @fcpeuro
      @fcpeuro  Рік тому

      Glad you enjoyed it!

  • @unenmaths
    @unenmaths 2 роки тому +1

    Very nice video.

    • @fcpeuro
      @fcpeuro  2 роки тому

      Thank you very much!

  • @robinoconnor1203
    @robinoconnor1203 2 роки тому +2

    Good video, it may have been worth mentioning, the gen1 996 shared many parts with the Boxster, part of Porsche cost cutting.

  • @garage19builds
    @garage19builds 2 роки тому

    They made a 996.1 GT3 due to the 25 year rule those will be able to import, rare expendive for sure but definitely worthy or mentioning, the early year produced 996.1s don't have amber turn signals in the headlights lights. They were clear.

  • @knightrida6829
    @knightrida6829 Рік тому

    Awsome job bro

  • @thromeas1
    @thromeas1 Рік тому

    Great video!

  • @jahblessin3996
    @jahblessin3996 2 роки тому

    Great video. Always loved the 996 turbo. I learned how to drive a stick on an old 911 (g series) and was in love since. Looks like I slept too long as pricing is wild but it will be mine. Oh yes it will be mine.

    • @fcpeuro
      @fcpeuro  2 роки тому

      What a great vehicle to learn in!

  • @corychecketts
    @corychecketts 2 роки тому +2

    I have a friend who owns 20 Porsches and he told me that he really thinks the MY1999 911s will go down as one of the greatest models of the 911 lineup. Basically, he views the 911 in three distinct eras: air-cooled, water-cooled, and hybird/electric.
    Similar to how SWB cars are crazy desireable for being the first of the line, he views the early water-cooled cars in the same way, especially since Porsche very well could be moving 911s to hybrid and electric with the upcoming 994 and 998 platforms.
    Anyway, just buy a 996 while they're still affordable.

    • @suzukitaka4470
      @suzukitaka4470 2 роки тому

      i bought 1999 996.1 carrera couple with 28000 miles. Polar silver metallic and metro blue interior. Love the car and can't wait to hit 100,000 miles! It is my first porsche and hope he is right!

  • @edventures9884
    @edventures9884 Рік тому

    Woah this video is perfect

  • @failforwardfast8609
    @failforwardfast8609 9 місяців тому

    Thank you!

    • @fcpeuro
      @fcpeuro  8 місяців тому

      You're welcome!

  • @unenmaths
    @unenmaths 2 роки тому

    996.1 exist in GT3 and turbo. All 996.1 did not have turn signals ambrer...some latest version were transparent...

  • @icetroll734
    @icetroll734 11 місяців тому

    Nice guys! But how can you say the interior doesn't last, have you not seen cracked 993 964v interiors? 996 was a massive leap forward in interior longevity (and cheap as chips to replace if ever needed)

  • @Pedropereira-eb3mk
    @Pedropereira-eb3mk Рік тому

    The targa is 2wd… the last targa with rear wheel drive made by Porsche

  • @philippesimoen8472
    @philippesimoen8472 Рік тому

    This is a great review but can anyone tell me how rebuild a 996 to a competition car for racing ?

  • @essexdrainageltd5910
    @essexdrainageltd5910 2 роки тому +5

    Very detailed video just one point I thought the early 996 had the dual role bearing being stronger than the later Single bearing which had all the problems

    • @RicknWRX
      @RicknWRX 2 роки тому

      Ims is a non issue though with all the upgraded and replacement bearing options.

    • @RayMelville
      @RayMelville 2 роки тому +1

      Issue has to do with lack of lubrication of the sealed bearing after seal gets compromised not strength. That’s why both are subject to the issue

  • @wanderingandroid
    @wanderingandroid 2 місяці тому

    996.1 911's are also called 911 boxster

  • @thomasdiederich7781
    @thomasdiederich7781 2 роки тому +2

    There was never a Targa 4 for the 996 - sadly :-(
    The Targa was only available with 2 wheel drive.

  • @richardgraham1167
    @richardgraham1167 Рік тому

    Hans Mezger designed the turbo engine. Not Metzger.

  • @mgr207
    @mgr207 11 місяців тому

    I‘m missing the 996 GT3 MK1

  • @koolkat969
    @koolkat969 2 роки тому

    I enjoyed the buyers guide but how come there's no mention of the gt3rs?

  • @JR_harlow
    @JR_harlow 2 роки тому

    2001 there was targa, turbo, GT2 and GT3..options. That is a 996.1 car so that makes
    1.carrera 2
    2.carrera 4
    3.GT2
    4.GT3
    5.turbo
    6.targa also the 2 and for both available in convertible as well.....
    The 996.2 had the 4S that's the only model i know of that's a gen 2 specific difference in model range.

    • @JR_harlow
      @JR_harlow 2 роки тому

      There is so much wrong in this video and so much left out... the whole bit about the interior didn't mention the missing glove box on the early models the difference in the headlights between 99 to 01 the difference steering wheels in the first gen the different performance packages like the x50 option, wild video indeed to sound and have all the cars there yet so much (typo) I dare say information?!?!

  • @RSADYNAMICS
    @RSADYNAMICS 2 роки тому

    How does the chassis compare on the turbo model I know the rear quarter panels are 65 mm wider what other differences are there ? Or where can I find a full list of all changes and modifications

  • @xliu37
    @xliu37 2 роки тому +4

    Why not mention x50 and turbo S

  • @cgoldens
    @cgoldens 2 роки тому

    Also a turbo S in 2005

  • @Garfang_
    @Garfang_ Рік тому

    There was a MK1 GT3 though...

  • @MrLambo234
    @MrLambo234 2 роки тому +2

    No mention of turbo S?

    • @cabbys
      @cabbys 2 роки тому

      Was there an official Turbo S version? I think the 996 Turbo with X50 package is considered the Turbo S of the 996 line? Not sure about this.

    • @golf1diesel
      @golf1diesel 2 роки тому

      @@cabbys Turbo S was made in 2005,had the X50 spec on it.

  • @Sandiegocruiser
    @Sandiegocruiser 2 роки тому

    U didn’t mention which engine is used in 996.2 targa

  • @jason22spurs
    @jason22spurs 2 роки тому +1

    What about 98 car ???

  • @jackleonard2088
    @jackleonard2088 8 місяців тому

    Did I miss the years for each model?

  • @JR_harlow
    @JR_harlow 2 роки тому

    No targa 4 was offered in 996.. neither first gen or second gen 996.. targa 4 or (all wheel drive) wasn't offered until 997. In fact targa is my favorite model personally and in 2004 specifically it had a super low production number, something like less than 1800 made total. It is the only 911 model with the rear glass that opens like a hatchback..

  • @andraynapolez3593
    @andraynapolez3593 11 місяців тому

    40th Anniversary, Millennium Edition,,,,?

  • @cayman9873
    @cayman9873 2 роки тому

    Looking for a base coupe w manual. Sport suspension if possible. My budget is 40 k. Any chance I can find a base 997 in my budget ?? Hope to see a similar video on the early 2005 997 porsche when you can. Thanks

    • @fcpeuro
      @fcpeuro  2 роки тому

      We are working on a 997 buyers guide as we type!

  • @alex329
    @alex329 2 роки тому +1

    Where's the 996.1 GT3 ?

    • @fcpeuro
      @fcpeuro  2 роки тому

      Sadly in Europe and not here with us in NA.

  • @nickplaks1
    @nickplaks1 Рік тому

    Fcp euro, what suspension package is on the silver 3.4 that you feature in this clip? Looks lower than stock. Thanks

    • @fcpeuro
      @fcpeuro  Рік тому

      Hi Nick, that one is sitting on Öhlins Road and Track coilovers. ua-cam.com/video/BJiQzTthDCU/v-deo.html

    • @nickplaks1
      @nickplaks1 Рік тому

      When are you guys going to start selling fcp euro t shirts again?

  • @PapaG603
    @PapaG603 2 роки тому +2

    Miss my 4s..wish i never sold it

  • @user-ee1te8ty8p
    @user-ee1te8ty8p 2 роки тому

    What about the cabriolet?

    • @fcpeuro
      @fcpeuro  2 роки тому +1

      They were too cold to come out and play that day!

  • @jason22spurs
    @jason22spurs 2 роки тому +1

    1997-2005 not 99
    Not late 98 !!!

  • @edanielk2
    @edanielk2 2 роки тому

    I have a 2003 4S. An information card that appears to have originally come with the car says the HP on the 4S is 345 but in every video I watch it is stated as 315 or 320. I have never been able to find a clear answer on if its 345 or 320. I do not an X51. Can anyone shed light on this?

    • @johnconnor818
      @johnconnor818 2 роки тому

      US spec 4S has 320bhp, euro spec I believe has 315bhp. It's the exact same motor as the Carrera 2 unless optioned otherwise.

    • @cabbys
      @cabbys 2 роки тому +1

      The X51 package provides 345 HP. In the U. S. standard C4S was 320 HP.

    • @edanielk2
      @edanielk2 2 роки тому

      @@cabbys So the S has the same HP as the 3.6 .2Carrera and the S (in this generation) is just an appearance and equipment package?

    • @pedoloverfortheages
      @pedoloverfortheages 2 роки тому

      @@edanielk2 c4s uses the turbo wide body (with the excel of the engine lid and rear bumper - unique to the c4s), suspension, 4wd and brakes.

  • @drivinivan
    @drivinivan 2 роки тому

    A nice buyer's guide, very informative. Here's the 996 I chose, and my full buyer's guide and driving review as well: ua-cam.com/video/_o1JlPN9w3w/v-deo.html

  • @steverush8362
    @steverush8362 2 роки тому

    Fun opinion...but some glossed over holes...so complete, correct...ah, no

  • @mark_n_r
    @mark_n_r 2 місяці тому

    Who calls them "dot" ???
    They are called version 1 and version 2.
    If you to claim to be an expert then... be an expert.

  • @deltabravoyalfa1027
    @deltabravoyalfa1027 Рік тому +1

    🏁911 GT1 >>> Porsche 996🏁🇩🇪

  • @unenmaths
    @unenmaths 2 роки тому

    996 targa 4 does not exist.

  • @mikaelolofson7700
    @mikaelolofson7700 2 роки тому +1

    The first version came 1997, not 1999…

    • @henryatkinson1479
      @henryatkinson1479 2 роки тому +2

      There were 14 996s built in 1997, all prototypes. There were a few really early cars (3/98 and before) sold in Europe as 1998 model years (less than 1200 cars), and the rest were all sold as 1999s or later.

  • @ernestcapbert3175
    @ernestcapbert3175 2 роки тому

    It’s light, it’s fast, but the interior looks like a late 90’s Ford bronco. We spend so much time inside these cars, when we’re driving them and I know it’s subjective, but for this kind of car, too much plastic, interior design really is bad.

    • @paulbellas8797
      @paulbellas8797 2 роки тому +1

      Early 911’s had horrible air conditioning and heating. The 966 had mor creature comforts than previous models but yes some of the plastics do look cheep. Overall though, I like the style and use of leather at touch points. Just some of the shiny plastic bits are cheesy. You can change a lot of these parts out with carbon fiber after market stuff if you are willing to spend some $$$

  • @modellbobby
    @modellbobby 6 місяців тому

    Advise buyers Guide. Don’t buy an ugly 996 at all. Shit car and even more shitty engine. Only buy 996 turbo. Other motor

    • @C4S911
      @C4S911 3 місяці тому

      Wrong!