I appreciate your kind words. I make up these examples, based on personal and professional experience. I am glad you find them helpful. Have a lovely day.
@@parthlapalikar 😊 Normally yes, but for this major occupancy you have to use T.3.7.4.9. for the WC. And in that table you can see that it gives you both the WC and the lavatories (look at the name of the right-most column). I hope this makes sense.
Professor, on slide #5 why did you deduct 130? Not 100 ! I understand it as over 100 we need one W.C for each 30 so 197-100=97 now we divide 97 by 30 Does it make sense?
That's a great questions. It's because between 100 and 129 persons (pp) it is still 6 WC. It is only once your reach 130 pp that you add 1 WC to 6 WC to get 7 WC. Please refer to the table showed at 11:03 . I always use this longer table to calculate WC because I find the wording in the Tables so confusing (i.e.: "6 plus 1 for each additional increment of 30 persons...). I hope this makes sense.
Hello. The wording in the Tables for the "over 100...plus 1 for each additional increment of 30 persons" is notoriously confusing, and that is why I prefer the "Table method". My interpretation is that "30 pp = +1". So "29 pp = no change" I will try to show what I mean with the first increment of 30 above 100... 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 At this point, there are zero increments of 30 in excess of 100, because there are only 29 pp. So the number of WC is unchanged from the what the Table reads for "over 100" (i.e.: 6). However, as soon as we hit the 130 pp, we are now at an increment of 30 pp "over 100", which means "+1". So 6 + 1 = 7 at 130 pp. Ditto for 160, 190, etc. I hope this makes sense.
thank you so much Dear Francesco for clear and complete explanation. so useful 👏
Great explanations! Thanks for making things so easy to understand
Thanks a lot 👏🏻
You made me laugh between the 8th and 9th minute of the video 😅.... Thanks for the help Prof!
Happy to help!
😁
Very easy to understand. Thanks, Professor!
Thank you very much for making video. From where did you learn these examples?
I appreciate your kind words.
I make up these examples, based on personal and professional experience.
I am glad you find them helpful.
Have a lovely day.
isnt it 1 lav for every 2 wc?
@@parthlapalikar 😊
Normally yes, but for this major occupancy you have to use T.3.7.4.9. for the WC. And in that table you can see that it gives you both the WC and the lavatories (look at the name of the right-most column).
I hope this makes sense.
@@FrancescoTangorra thank you!!
Professor, on slide #5 why did you deduct 130? Not 100 ! I understand it as over 100 we need one W.C for each 30 so 197-100=97 now we divide 97 by 30
Does it make sense?
That's a great questions.
It's because between 100 and 129 persons (pp) it is still 6 WC. It is only once your reach 130 pp that you add 1 WC to 6 WC to get 7 WC.
Please refer to the table showed at 11:03 . I always use this longer table to calculate WC because I find the wording in the Tables so confusing (i.e.: "6 plus 1 for each additional increment of 30 persons...).
I hope this makes sense.
Got it, thank you so much.
at 11:10 you are wrong, 160-130=30, 30/30=1, so 6+1=7. so 160 should be 7. 131-160 are 7 watercloset. 101-130 are 6 watercloset......and so on
Hello.
The wording in the Tables for the "over 100...plus 1 for each additional increment of 30 persons" is notoriously confusing, and that is why I prefer the "Table method".
My interpretation is that "30 pp = +1". So "29 pp = no change"
I will try to show what I mean with the first increment of 30 above 100...
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
At this point, there are zero increments of 30 in excess of 100, because there are only 29 pp. So the number of WC is unchanged from the what the Table reads for "over 100" (i.e.: 6).
However, as soon as we hit the 130 pp, we are now at an increment of 30 pp "over 100", which means "+1". So 6 + 1 = 7 at 130 pp.
Ditto for 160, 190, etc.
I hope this makes sense.
One more thing, if you disagree please let me know so that we may discuss it further.
You're awesome.
👍