Solidworks balsa bridge structural analysis

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 вер 2024
  • This is a self demonstrated soldiworks exercise to evaluate
    loading capacity of a small scale bridge made of balsa wood
    material.
    By carrying static structural analysis of balsa bridge using
    solidworks simulation, we will evaluate maximum bending stress,
    deformation as well as factor of safety parameters.
    If bending stress is more than material yield strength, then factor
    of safety will be less than one. Multiply that FoS with applied
    load to determine loading capacity of bridge with solidworks.
    For more soldiworks simulation tutorials, please subscribe
    our channel.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 6

  • @sirclippliers
    @sirclippliers 2 роки тому +1

    I was just wondering, how would this compare to having one end of your "bridge" as a fixed (immovable) point and the other as a roller/slider, versus the fixed both ends? Is there a correct way to analyse it?

    • @cadingal
      @cadingal  2 роки тому

      OK, will be uploaded tutorial for this issue.

    • @tomislavbunjevcevic9912
      @tomislavbunjevcevic9912 Рік тому +1

      It's a bridge. one side must be roller. If both ends are fixed you will get unrealistic results. it will apear that the bridge is way more strong than it really is. It's one of the greatest pitfalls of noobs using FEA

  • @tomislavbunjevcevic9912
    @tomislavbunjevcevic9912 Рік тому +1

    Solidworks is really bad for this kind of work. You have to make the 3d model of the profiles instead of just defining them in the analysis. Profile library is basically empty

    • @cadingal
      @cadingal  Рік тому

      I respect your opinion but not too much.

    • @tomislavbunjevcevic9912
      @tomislavbunjevcevic9912 Рік тому

      @@cadingal in most other software packages you could just draw one simple sketch. Beam/truss elements are usually defined as idealizations, so there is no need to have any 3d geometry. But solidworks forces you to make 3d model, which is not trivial as its beam profile library is by default mostly empty. You can populate it or draw your own sections, but it is all extra work. I hope i made myself a bit more clear. It is not a matter of opinion but a fact.