Did You Know In PETER PAN 2: RETURN TO NEVERLAND…
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 жов 2022
- You’ll notice that there have been some modifications made to the design of a specific Neverland species in the movie. Take note of the look the mermaids have in this sequel. They are now all seen to be wearing brassieres when on screen for their short appearance. This is likely due to how the appearance of some of the mermaids in the first Peter Pan movie was heavily criticized and considered to be too sexualised for a young target audience, with some only having their hair or long necklaces covering their upper private parts.
Movie: Peter Pan 2: Return to Never Land
Subscribe: bit.ly/3AVCNs1
#Shorts #MovieFacts #DidYouKnow - Розваги
I think just having the hair cover them or a necklace makes them look even more magical
And more accurate. How many mermaids would actually wear living animals on their breasts?
@@gayjayy Exactly 😂😅
True. Its kids more natural
@@gayjayy true
@@gayjayydid you know a seastar's mouth is at the center of its body?
I’m gunna be honest, as a kid I never even noticed that
I was too focused on the fact there were cool slightly murderous mermaids on screen to notice
As a kid I noticed but my mom said she knew I was lesbian when I was 7 so maybe that was just me
@@emmanone621 Damn, got outted by Peter Pan? I feel that
I just thought “magical mermaid were so cool” they were covered up so in my child’s brain it might as well have been bras.
I always thought of them as mean bitches.
@@emmanone621 Yeah my mom said she knew I was a breast man when I was still a toddler. XD
angry moms :"this generation is so sensitive"
also moms:
There has never been criticism about this of the mermaids or about the mermaid in general, there's nothing about it on movie trivias, not on IMDb, nor on Wikipedia, not on Disney Wiki! He made it up! Neo-puritan Disney under Micheal Eisner and Bob Iger simply created a problem and then "fixed" it! I also remind you that the age target audience of the older Disney animated movies was more mature than the one more recent from Micheal Eisner to Bob Iger eras, and I also remind you that (non-canon and unsuccesful) Peter Pan 2: Return To Neverland was made by the more kid-friendly and defunct DisneyToon Studios!
@@dandycrow2821 even still. parents are so suprised that their kids are entitled and sensitive when their the ones who made them that way by coddling their children and thinking no one can hurt them
@@pileofsaltOG Those angry moms, unironically, were and are usually feminist and liberal neo-puritan Karens. In fact, Walt Disney was conservative, and Japanese artists and developers are conservatives. Coincidence?
People have been sensitive for decades they just get on different things to be offended over, and thanks to the internet everyone and their mom can share their opinions on any given topic
@@frogking6416 no but fr. people who call others snowflakes are also as well technically snowflakes. everyone gets offended by something but for some reason older generations act like it's just gen z
What young child would be thinking "Mermaid obscenity! Throw it out mother!" A child wouldn't even notice 😂
To be honest I didn’t notice either I watch that movie all the time and I’m 13!
I noticed but didn't see anything wrong with it
I didn't notice it untill it was pointed out
@@Anon12077 It's like in classical paintings and statues. Fairies and mermaids afaik were always depicted being naked and nobody gave a shit until movies became a thing.
A feminist
Dude if mermaids existed I am pretty sure they wouldn't even be wearing bras. Even if they did, they wouldn't be mutilating clams over it lmfao
Boobs hurt when they bounce even in water.
I'm not sure they'd have breasts in the first place, since I doubt they'd feed their young that way.
@@Dan_- omg you're right
@@Dan_- i don't know in my mind there might just be two or more types of mermaids if they did exist mammals and more fish like so they could breastfeed their young
@@Dan_- If they do, chances are, mermaid breasts would probably be there purely to protect vital organs or for some other purpose. Some people have similar speculations on the inklings' and octolings' breasts in Splatoon for similar reasons.
I feel like the old movie covered more than the new one
There has never been criticism about this of the mermaids or about the mermaid in general, there's nothing about it on movie trivias, not on IMDb, nor on Wikipedia, not on Disney Wiki! He made it up! Neo-puritan Disney under Micheal Eisner and Bob Iger simply created a problem and then "fixed" it! I also remind you that the age target audience of the older Disney animated movies was more mature than the one more recent from Micheal Eisner to Bob Iger eras, and I also remind you that (non-canon and unsuccesful) Peter Pan 2: Return To Neverland was made by the more kid-friendly and defunct DisneyToon Studios!
@@dandycrow2821 cringe
@@ngrjordi2352 Me? Why, scuse me?
Not really
Yes from the movies I've seen.@@rawdasalmataman7908
"upper private parts" at this point call them lumps of flesh
I'm editing this comment because I have literally gotten 4 notifications every day that someone has commented on here to say this.
Chesticals
@@abnormalcaffeineintake2532 ha
@@Yeno__ 😃
@@abnormalcaffeineintake2532 NAHHH IM CALLING MY TITS THIS NOW
@@FuzaketeSatsugai That's what I call mine😂
That's not even the worst bit ....THEY CHANGED THERE TAIL COLOURS!! the original ones had SKY BLUE but now they have a SEAFOAM GREEN similar to Ariel
Aren’t they related to Ariel?
@@angelacooper8973 not officially, they could be cousin's of Ariel, but not directly. people theorize that queen Athena( Ariel's mum, from "Ariel's beginning") was a Neverland mermaid but I don't think that's the case. Theyer....a different breed to Ariel is, as if you look at there tails, the Neverland mermaids don't have the fins Ariel does, even the mermaid with the ponytail ( who's speculated to be Athena) doesn't. When they re designed the mermaids in PP2:RN , they could have added the fins onto there desighn but they didn't
Their*
....why?
@@Spacebugg inconsistency💀
People freak out way too much over women’s chest
ong, and its not like they were bare chested and flashing the camera 😭 they were legit just existing onscreen
Yeah and they don't freak out over a man not wearing a shirt
“FBI Open up”
True, it's something I never really got, there is pretty much no problem with seeing a man without his shirt, including overweight men, while it's considered scandalous for a woman to not wear a shirt because a part of their body sticks out a bit and can bounce, and yet it's not scandalous when a 300 pound man is on the beach with his shirt off and there is plenty of flesh sticking out and bouncing.
What I love is when a man gets a sex change on TV, and before the surgery they show his chest and after they blur it out. We’re a nation of prudes! 😂
“We were only trying to drown her”
That line stuck out to me more than anything…
The old movie was more modest cause they added less shape to the chest
There has never been criticism about this of the mermaids or about the mermaid in general, there's nothing about it on movie trivias, not on IMDb, nor on Wikipedia, not on Disney Wiki! He made it up! Neo-puritan Disney under Micheal Eisner and Bob Iger simply created a problem and then "fixed" it! I also remind you that the age target audience of the older Disney animated movies was more mature than the one more recent from Micheal Eisner to Bob Iger eras, and I also remind you that (non-canon and unsuccesful) Peter Pan 2: Return To Neverland was made by the more kid-friendly and defunct DisneyToon Studios!
@@pillowdragon5576 And A cups don't exist either...
@@serasv1249 not everyone is gonna be flat
@@serasv1249 most people are not flat
What r yall arguing about? Op just saying they had smaller breasts, thats all.
As a child who LOVED Peter Pan; I can say that I literally NEVER noticed and I watched it daily. People complain about these things but kids literally don't notice.
It's like dress codes at school where only the teachers and staff notice how "inappropriate" the students are.
@@monsterhanna6691 EXACTLY!
Same this was my favorite movie as a kid but I never noticed
@@monsterhanna6691 "those distractive shoulders".
A lot of people also don't realize how racist Peter Pan is, but that doesn't make it okay.
The young audience was literally at most 7 years off of using those “upper private parts” as a source of warmth, food, and connection to their maternal figures
'mermaids try to pull wendy in the water to possibly drown her and peter is laughing at it' mom 'they are wearing no bras, how indecent! grab the pitchforks!
This is the formula generation, actually. So have pity on them.
@@velvety2006 I'm okay with topless women drowning me. That's a cool way to die. Especially if they're monsters.
That's like one tier down from being fucked to death by hot minotaur babes.
@@InternetMameluq Do you have a problem with formula or something?
@@twist_ending7545 What do you mean, formula? You mean the invention? No. You mean Nestle? Yes.
“They're called boobs, Ed” - E.Brockovich
I've literally never heard anyone call breasts "upper private parts".
I haven't heard in this decade. But it's a thing, I assue you. Especially in 1000 AD.
@@InternetMameluq I'm more of a 1000 BC kind of dude
@@Pharaoh_TutankhamenLet's disco dance, Hammurabi.
@@Pharaoh_TutankhamenIronically the Mameluq Sultanate was almost exactly 1300 AD, compared to Tutankhamun's 1300 BC.
Old fairytale Illustrations would usually have mermaids covered up like that or even have their chests out. It wasn't perverted it was whimsical, like of course they don't have clothes in the sea, they're basically fish!
I miss old fairy tales. I think the whole "protecting the youth" changes kinda ruined the point of a lot of them and removed the magic of what made them special.
@@renomiz2373 i dunno. Making the little mermaid walk on knives, or have pinocchio literally be a murderer might not have been the best even back then
@@troywright359 That's the thing, Pinocchio and The little mermaid aren't exactly fairy tales. They are more like Alice in wonderland or the Land of OZ than stories from folklore. Tbf pinnochio actually lived in the book and didn't really die and the knives were a metaphor for the pain.
Fairy tales like by the Grimms actually weren't as dark as people seem to think they are.
@@renomiz2373I have the grimms fairytales and they're a lot darker than most people realize.
Bro, they're the ones making it Inappropriate. 💀
'mermaids try to pull wendy to possibly drown her and peter laughs at it' moms seeing the movies: gasp the mermaids wear no bras! how indecent, grab the pitchforks!
Exactly they're the ones who see breasts as sexual things 🙄. They're the ones saying that.
@@justanothermortal1373 well, the naked human body is really sexualized (even tho at the start clothes didn't exist and humans were naked bc, well... it's our body, but humans created clothes and decided it's sexual not to wear them), mostly boobs, and that will probably always be like that :/
@@Cixzag It is evolutionary intented.
Just call them breasts. Half the population has them
Exactly it sounds like they're just dirty calling them upper privates which they freaking aren't!🤦🏻♀️
Actually 100% of the population has breasts. We just colloquially only refer to women this way. That’s why males have nipples and can get breast cancer
All of the population has them.
We don't censor organs based on size, that's stupid. What size do your fingers need to be before they're 'indecent'?
@@Creepystalker102 Yeah, did you know that men's breasts used to be considered just as sexual as women's breasts? That's why you can see all those old timey protestant men wearing full body swimsuits around 1900 AD. They passed laws to make men's chests acceptable bare, but not womens...
Well, for most places in Anglo america. There's a patchwork of 'right to bare breast' locales, like my own British Columbia.
@@InternetMameluq male chest was never seen as sexual at all. Only their muscle is often contemplated. The difference is that in old times being exposed in any way in public was considered inappropriate. Men & Women used complete clothes, including swimsuits & pajamas. It isn't like men grow breast tissue during puberty.
It never bothered me when I was a kid watching the mermaids in the 1st Peter Pan.
Because their mermaids and it made sense to me as a young child Why mermaids didn't wear clothes.
There was nothing wrong with the design they were quite decent.
It's not like they showed Peter Pan playing with their Boobs.
Same, I never paid attention to that
They went from the Lost Boys to the Hardy Boys!
Im pretty sure all kids are aware their moms and other women in their lives have breasts, they're a normal part of human bodies. Covering up or deleting them in movies to avoid letting kids notice them literally makes no sense
@@12Tecpatl of course
But even if Peter pan did play with them, why would that have bothered anyone?
"Upper private parts"🤣🤣I'm dying
I actually like the original mermaids in the original Peter Pan, it seems more realistic and feels how mermaids would actually be
when I was a child I never thought of the mermaids in such way, children are not the dirty minded ones, the adults are!! if you believe something to be inappropriate that is YOU, the child won't see what you see.
Too sexualised for kids? I can honestly say I never, ever thought of them in that way and never have 🤣 they were just pretty mermaids and that was it.
I didn’t even notice the mermaids weren’t fully covered until this video. 👁👄👁
Having their hair or necklaces cover them is more realistic. What kind of mermaid just slaps on a starfish and thinks “hm, yes… this is comfortable”💀
And how would they get sea star to stay there unmoving if it is still alive. They are carnivorous animals.
@@turkoositerapsidi Still very unrealistic.
@@panda_cute8856 Yes, but I did made one month stake, not all sea stars are carnivorous, but some are.
You could and would not keep them like that.
Clam shells would actually make sense because mermaids would likely eat clams anyway.
@panda_cute8856
Bras were Not available to Mermaids Back Then , They Had to Use Seashells & Seastars to Cover Their BOOBS.
😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
@@davidwesley2525 Obviously but more realistically they would’ve just used their hair or necklaces OR just didn’t care and let them hang out.
I always thought it was to give them a look more like Ariel in Peter Pan 2. So that you know the Disneyverse is connected.
Kids literally don't sexualize the human body until way later in life.
This was unnecessary
And the mermaids themselves weren’t even sexualized either, they’re just existing
They do if they've been sexually assaulted.
@@sadespain01even then, they don’t understand being sexualized like the mermaids were.
Personally I liked them just having the necklace or hair covering their chest because it seemed more realistic and made them more mythical to me because I never thought that mermaids would actually wear shells and starfish to cover themselves. Basically they wouldn't be embarrassed about showing skin is how I always thought of it
I don't remember hearing anyone criticizing the mermaids .
Must have been some rich fussy people who paid $ to have their Criticism heard.
Conservatives. Plain and simple.
well, that was 70 years ago
Back in another time, this was a staple of purity, a mind of innocence and freedom.
It’s possible to though, the mermaids are underage so they have to be more careful compare to the old days where a myth was myth.
I actually like the way the hair or the necklaces cover their chest, it feels more real and its closer to legends of sirens
Same. I love mythology and it kind of bugs me when they modify how the real creatures look. Unless it’s something that really shouldn’t be shown in a kids movie, I see no problem with having mythological creatures look like how they really would.
But aren't sirens sea bird people?
@@turkoositerapsidiit depends on which sirens you’re looking at. Greek sirens, yes, those were the bird women who couldn’t leave their island. Other stories of sirens were actually half fish women, some were mermaids who went mad or were the spirits of vengeful women who were drowned.
@@BPJD2004 Yeah I remember that some time the description of sirens did change in some areas to became half fish women, and that word is used for mermaid in some languages today. Was it many or few Latin languages like Italian or Spanish? I think I should see from online dictionary.
They complained about that, but didnt complain that the mermaids actively tried to drown wendy?
and peter laughing while they were trying
Well, it's like that one South Park episode, where they say parents won't care if something is violent as long as it has sexual stuff in it!
Just look at GTA's HOT COFFEE MOD controversy (there was a GTA game that had a scrapped SEX mini game which could be enabled with mods & parents got miffed, despite the game being Rated M for Mature 17+ known for its violent content)! Its just sad, how people fail to realize they aren't wearing bras cause they are magical creatures who lack any shame regarding their bodies (its like those tribes where the women walk around topless cause its considered completely normal in their culture & may be even practical as they may live in a hot climate, or they simply never developed clothing to cover a woman's breasts) & don't wear bras simply cause they are effectively fully nude as their mermaid tails are meant to be part of their bodies even if you can't see any visible genitalia (as it may be internal or eggs are fertilized outside of the mother's body like some species of fish, as some sharks species do give birth to live young, with bull sharks even cannibalizing their siblings in the womb, so there might be some mermaids that give birth to live young & possibly breast feed their children like humans especially if your a fan of Aquatic Ape theory being an explanation for how mermaid evolution might work)!
Basically Mermaids don't wear clothes cause they are like fish & probably cause stories of naked women with fish tails was more appealing to sailors who often went on long voyages & were so starved for female companionship, that some mistook Manatees & Dugongs for mermaids! Sure you could argue the entire idea of mermaids may be a perverted male fantasy, but then again not all mermaids were friendly & some were basically sea monsters that took the form of beautiful women or would lead sailors to their doom (sailors were a superstitious lot & considering some considered it bad luck to have a woman onboard a ship, one could imagine that line of thinking leading some men to view mermaids as bad luck for the same reasons, which come to think of it was probably for the best, as I imagine having a single female onboard a ship full of men sounds like a potential recipe for disaster, human or mermaid, though at least in the mermaid's case she could flee by jumping ship & swimming away)!
@@velvety2006 Another reason why the 2003 remake was actually really nice. Not only because they made it a strong love story between Peter and Wendy but in that scene Peter protected Wendy from the mermaid trying to drown her.
Peter: Hey, girls, I see you’re wearing seashells and sea stars now.
Mermaids: Well, we’d like to start a new custom. Our hair and necklaces are just too loose.
Boomers - "DoNt Be A sNoWfLaKe!"
Also Boomers - "BOOBS?!"
Terrifying how Disney went from "insinuating toplessness is bad" to "Every single Disney product must include sexuality and knowing the orientation of each character.
A child wouldn’t understand the fact that their bare chested, people need to stop freaking out over woman’s chest
Yeah, women have other organs we can complain about.
Ok but-
Mermaids don’t wear anything in the “lumps of flesh”
(lol someone said that)
So they where making it accurate👁_👁
Honestly, I never paid attention to that as a little girl and even now as an adult woman
Hell, a couple of the mermaids probably went to sleep while eating and ended up with starfish covering their tatas and just never bothered to remove them lol
@@MadameSomnambule maybe that’s what happened lol
@@MadameSomnambule wait- don’t starfish have mouths?-
@@No0neKn0ws Yes. They also have tube feet at underside of their arms that they use in feeding and movement for example.
Upper private parts? I've heard many things over the years but this is truly a first
To those people: I have never noticed this, and Peter Pan was the movie I watched all the time as a kid.
Do people not realize that the “target audience” aka five year olds don’t care or even notice these things.
JUST CALL THEM BREASTS IT IS NOT HARD
The Narrator Can't Say Breasts or Boobs Because They're Naughty Words.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
It amazes me sometimes how while I do understand the thoughts behind this as an adult, it also has never occurred to me to notice this detail. Not as a kid and not as an adult 🤨 part of me wonders why it matters this much
When you have hangups about something, it becomes something you focus on.
It's why in some cultures ankles and elbows were considered indecent to show, while others male and female breasts were not regarded as being different levels of indecent.
My question is why a part of anatomy which children are required to interact with for the first few years of their lives are regarded as indecent for children to see, but male nipples aren't.
@@the_last_ballad because the female body is constantly sexualized for no reason. sad society we live in
"Did you know in Peter Pan 2..."
There's a Peter Pan 2?!
"upper private parts"
Sir the word you were looking for is "chest". Everyone has a chest, some are just rounder and bigger than others.
“Upper private parts”?
Ok I know women shield their nips but I really wouldn’t call them private parts
As a kid, I can say I did not notice or care. I just loved the mermaids
I love mermaids too
Bro just call them their name at this point-
To be honest, I never really saw anyone complain about the mermaids, but I'd believe it.
I can’t believe you didn’t mention the fact that Peter did mature a little …
Tbh, I've never even noticed it in the first movie, I just felt sorry for Wendy, who was so excited to see mermaids, only to have them be jerks to her for no reason 😕
They were jerks because they liked Peter Pan. Just like Tinkerbell did
That is the most cursed thumbnail
Other people: "Wow, that's a neat detail!"
Me: "There's a Peter Pan 2?"
Boobs in an art museum (nobody panics) because it's all part of the plan.
Boobs in animated media(everyone loses their mind).
Upset the established order.
Introduce a little anarchy.
"The thing about Chaos is
That it's fair"
Media has different standards and regulations than art. Also, some people feel more comfortable with more modesty, regardless of whether it's accurate or not.
Did you know this is actually an underrated Disney sequel? Sure it's not the original, but it's still the same characters with the new character written well, has a nice musical score, and the animation is spectacular!
I didn’t even know there was a Peter Pan 2 😭
Their hair and necklaces actually cover like 30% more than the shells
“Upper private parts”?
I’m glad I’m not the only one who was bothered by this lol
Men have sexualized us to the point that area isn't even remembered for it's main purpose of why they are different from the chest of a man and we have to either embrace them and be called a slut or hide them in shame but still get harassed none the same sad...
Seriously, why is it that mermen are allowed to be topless but mermaids aren't?! Sheesh, the hypocrisy...
I was too busy being down bad for tinkerbell to notice the mermaids
I think that not having actual clothes makes it more like they happen to exist and have breasts while making sure that they have bras makes it sexualized that they exist and have breasts
I don't think it works that way
@@rawdasalmataman7908 got a better explanation?
@@Dejected_Child I mean without bras they still look like they have breasts
At least that's for me
@@rawdasalmataman7908 oh no the original commenter meant to emphasize the sexualization part, not the looking like they have breasts part
@@Dejected_Child Yes I understand
The original commenter meant the sexualization in the second movie is more obvious than the first movie , am I right?
I love Return to Never Land (2002).
so if breasts (mammary glands) are reproductive organs, and mermaids cant exactly give birth, why would they need them/need to cover them??- Besides the necklaces and hair worked fine
People make breasts sexualized, it’s simply there for females to be able to feed their babies, not for men or other women to enjoy them.
It’s a part of the human body..deal with it.
You're completely wrong, breasts are also a sexual organ to show maturity in females. It's a good thing that men are attracted to a sign of adulthood. Men cannot help feeling attracted to breasts because evolution shaped their minds that way. If men weren't attracted to the markers of adulthood then we'd have a problem 💀
Not entirely true. They are, in fact, secondary erogenous zones, in both males and females.
I loved Peter Pan as a child. I didn’t know (besides the mermaid covering her boobs with her hair) that they didn’t have tops of any sort on. It never crossed my mind- even watching the movie recently. It was never an issue and it didn’t need to be “fixed”. The mermaids from the first movie look more “realistic” as to what most think of mermaids anyways
“Upper private parts” Bro, just never approach a woman. Please.
I never knew Peter Pan had a sequel.
It was a straight-to-video sequel afaik. There was also Lion King II: Simba’s Pride, Lady & the Tramp 2: Scamp’s Adventure, Hunchback of Notre-Dame II and The Little Mermaid 2: Return to the Sea.
@@Hyper_Drud I did watch Lion King 2, it's the best. But I don't know why Disney has to endlessly make sequels for literally anything.
Bruh how did u never notice they didn’t really have shirts in the first one. My child brain was just like “Oo mermaids!” And nothing more
"Upper private parts" as a women never call them that again EW. Do we call Adams apples upper private parts? no. so gross
"Upper Private Parts" God help us
The Narrator was TOO Much of a Prude to Say BOOBS .
😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
Gen Z: Peter Pan's depiction of Natives is racist and the mermaids are really mean.
Boomers: CARTOON BOOBIES COVERED UP BY NOTHING BUT HAIR AND NECKLACES IS A DISGRACE!!!
I'm gonna say that both are wrong
My dumbass: THERES PETER PAN 2!?!?!?
The thumbnail💀
ah yes. THAT was the character designs of peter pan that people are uncomfortable with. Nothing else....not at all...
Why!! Why does the opening of the video make me wish I was the girl
These moms don't realize that the kids won't even even notice, they're the only ones who did 😂
Bro this was my favorite movie as a kid and I didn't even notice that lol
Yeah
There has never been criticism about this of the mermaids or about the mermaid in general, there's nothing about it on movie trivias, not on IMDb, nor on Wikipedia, not on Disney Wiki! He made it up! Neo-puritan Disney under Micheal Eisner and Bob Iger simply created a problem and then "fixed" it! I also remind you that the age target audience of the older Disney animated movies was more mature than the one more recent from Micheal Eisner to Bob Iger eras, and I also remind you that (non-canon and unsuccesful) Peter Pan 2: Return To Neverland was made by the more kid-friendly and defunct DisneyToon Studios!
i mean, mermaids don't get bras tho.. they live underwater, but i get it.
ok:
When I was young, like 5 years I never noticed that the mermaids from Peter Pan 1 had nothing on their chest.
And here I am wondering why mermaids would have breasts (and bellybuttons) in the first place if they breed like fish.
*The Waffle House has found it’s new host*
the waffle house has found it’s new host
It's over buddy, he's said it's time to stop, go to a waffle house or diner near by, and give em a good tip. Time to stop.
NPC spotted
I known that real quick. When I was little I was like, “oh they have bras now”
How have I never realized that they were showing chest as a kid-
The Waffle House has found its new host
The Waffle House has found its new host
The first peter pan is kinda bad all around, but again a cherished movie in my heart
There has never been criticism about this of the mermaids or about the mermaid in general, there's nothing about it on movie trivias, not on IMDb, nor on Wikipedia, not on Disney Wiki! He made it up! Neo-puritan Disney under Micheal Eisner and Bob Iger simply created a problem and then "fixed" it! I also remind you that the age target audience of the older Disney animated movies was more mature than the one more recent from Micheal Eisner to Bob Iger eras, and I also remind you that (non-canon and unsuccesful) Peter Pan 2: Return To Neverland was made by the more kid-friendly and defunct DisneyToon Studios!
@@dandycrow2821 They were racist as fuck to the native americans
@@TariotFrog Too bad they were simply faithful to the source material and faithful to the comedic nature of the Disney version at the same time, and too bad they weren't even real Native Americans but "Indians" natives of Neverland figment of the imagination of 1800s/early 1900s British children. Someone here didn't inform themselves before embarassing themselves with mere feelings and ignorance instead of facts and information you could easily find on IMDb trivia and Disney Wiki. And I'm sure you watch South Park and Family Guy, though. Nice try, normie clown. 🤡🐑🐂💩
@@dandycrow2821 bestie this isnt reddit
As a kid i literally never noticed 💀
I can’t imagine the pain women go through having to cover two parts of their body
The waffle house has found it’s new host
The Waffle House has found it’s new host
The Waffle House has found it’s new host
@@ForggyFan ?
“ Guys what do you think my clam size is? “
Moms: YOU CAN NOT BE WATCHING THIS
Another change:
Tinkerbell no longer has the measurements of Marilyn Monroe, one of the reasons why is because most actresses who played Tinkerbell in Disneyworld aren't built like that.
Wait until they find out Peter pan gets the lost boys to fight for his own entertainment 💀
Bro my entire life watching this movie and I didn't even notice, no one cares except weirdo moms
I paused it in the wrong spot at the beginning 😭 Peter looks waaay too excited to be holding her
And this why I still have the VHS tapes to play for my kids.
I didn’t even notice that they weren’t fully covered when I was a kid
My Headcanon is that they simply realised that going topless in an island with immortal prepubescent boys isn't gonna sit right in their conscience, no matter which legend they originate from
Still reeks of victim-blaming. The mermaids have my support and sympathy.
Even as an adult, I didn't think much of the mermaids in the original.
OhHh nOoO meRmAId tIdDiEs. They still covered them.
When i watched peter pan as a child, i didn't even notice the mermaids didn't have those uper seashell sort of things.