Log odds interpretation of logistic regression

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 жов 2013
  • This video explains how the linear combination of the regression coefficients and the independent variables can be interpreted as representing the 'log odds' of success.
    Check out oxbridge-tutor.co.uk/undergrad... for course materials, and information regarding updates on each of the courses. Check out ben-lambert.com/econometrics-... for course materials, and information regarding updates on each of the courses. Quite excitingly (for me at least), I am about to publish a whole series of new videos on Bayesian statistics on youtube. See here for information: ben-lambert.com/bayesian/ Accompanying this series, there will be a book: www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1...
  • Навчання та стиль

КОМЕНТАРІ • 32

  • @minhha8981
    @minhha8981 Рік тому +2

    A 5 mins lecture >>>>>> An 1 hour and a half in class lecture. Mind blowing. Thank you.

  • @flashguy234
    @flashguy234 5 років тому +2

    Cheers Ben, this cleared up my understanding wonderfully!

  • @zgbjnnw9306
    @zgbjnnw9306 2 роки тому

    Excellent explanation! Always come to your channel when I got confused in class! Thank you so much : )

  • @prithviprakash1110
    @prithviprakash1110 2 роки тому

    Great explanation there. Can't believe this was posted way back in 2013. Still relevant nearly 10 years later!

  • @quocanhhbui8271
    @quocanhhbui8271 2 роки тому

    Omg just the right explanation im looking for. My professor introduced everything out of thin air and it was hard to put pieces together even though I have some backgrounds on logistic regression.

  • @pedrocolangelo5844
    @pedrocolangelo5844 2 роки тому

    Ben Lambert certainly has one of the best UA-cam channels ever

  • @anooshiravanrazmavar9814
    @anooshiravanrazmavar9814 3 роки тому

    Thank you very much professor Lambert that was very helpful.

  • @jorgepriegomoreno3224
    @jorgepriegomoreno3224 2 роки тому

    Can't stress enough how gratefoul I'm woth you kind Sir, my college degree in economics will be dedicated to you

  • @captainalan
    @captainalan 7 років тому +1

    this was very helpful; thanks!

  • @FlyingSavannahs
    @FlyingSavannahs 10 років тому +3

    Thanks simple videos to understand. Helps with many basic concepts....sometimes requiring review. hope to see more. Taking Categorical Data Analysis in the Spring....Doctoral level and I am not a Biostats major in Public Health....I am Epi. Looking forward to watching all to help review basic concepts I may have let go of.

    • @SpartacanUsuals
      @SpartacanUsuals  10 років тому +1

      Hi, many thanks for your message and kind words. If you are willing it would be great to see your syllabus; this would allow me to add these videos to the list. Best, Ben

  • @Azam_Pakistan
    @Azam_Pakistan 6 років тому +5

    Very nice. Please raise the audio volume, its very difficult to follow on my laptop.

  • @vimalkumar2992
    @vimalkumar2992 3 роки тому

    Your video is 'To the point'

  • @YouUndeground
    @YouUndeground 4 роки тому

    Thank you!

  • @kylevietti8700
    @kylevietti8700 Рік тому

    Thanks for showing but when doing 1-p. When you say the num and denim simplifying to one (you circled in purple) isn’t it just the number values of e^betas positive and negative values equaling zero then leaving you with 1/1+e^betas.

  • @bathanthegazy6083
    @bathanthegazy6083 7 років тому

    Thank you

  • @rodrigomorales5841
    @rodrigomorales5841 Місяць тому

    So to make sure; one can say that log of the odds is equivalent to the dot product (wT dot X) which is where we get our linear combination?

  • @smakarevich
    @smakarevich 8 років тому

    Nice!

  • @TheJourneyFootballVideos
    @TheJourneyFootballVideos 5 років тому

    Thanks :)

  • @zgbjnnw9306
    @zgbjnnw9306 2 роки тому

    Is the logistic regression part of GLM? Do you have videos explaining other GLM models in which the dependent variable follows other non-normal distributions, such as Gamma, poisson, negative binomial? Thank you!

  • @user-vk7cg7ik1h
    @user-vk7cg7ik1h Рік тому

    How to explain about linear regression and linear regression in interviewer frequently asking this questions could you make the video

  • @FlyingSavannahs
    @FlyingSavannahs 10 років тому +2

    Also, are you ever available for questions? Answered by video of course. In the U.S.. we have language barriers unless one is of Asian or Indian descent.

    • @SpartacanUsuals
      @SpartacanUsuals  10 років тому +1

      Hi, yes I am. I am also looking into getting my videos transcribed to help people with non-native English to understand the videos better. Many thanks, Ben

  • @kenjiyamazaki8802
    @kenjiyamazaki8802 10 років тому +3

    Is this about log of odds, not log of odds ratio? I believe odds is different from odds ratio.

    • @MAHANTING
      @MAHANTING 9 років тому +3

      they are same i think

    • @woodpeckersonfirs
      @woodpeckersonfirs 6 років тому +3

      No. Logit is log odds. Odds ratio is a ratio of odds

  • @yadavsanderamniwas
    @yadavsanderamniwas 4 роки тому +2

    this is not correct definition of odds ratio. p/1-p is odds, not odds ratio.
    odds ratio is altogether a different thing than odds. When you have a categorical predictor variable X and target variable Y, odds ratio is the ratio of odds .
    odds ratio=(odds of Y when X=1)/ (odds of Y when X=0)
    Please research and correct me if I am wrong.

    • @lastua8562
      @lastua8562 3 роки тому

      I am not sure I understand this correctly, specifically why your X is binary which is not necessary in Logit. Could you please review your comment and elaborate, if accurate?

  • @kumaraswamy7848
    @kumaraswamy7848 5 років тому +1

    how can we find beta0,beta1 values

    • @selfmadev85
      @selfmadev85 5 років тому

      Using maximum likelihood

  • @Unknown30799
    @Unknown30799 Рік тому

    👍