Which one would you like? Kinetic F-16A (2022) vs Tamiya F-16CJ (2007)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
  • [4K UHD] Kinetic 1/48 F-16A vs Tamiya 1/48 F-16CJ
    Comparison between Kinetic and Tamiya
    Kinetic 1/48 F-16A MLU NATO Fighter - K48100 (2022 All New Tooling)
    Tamiya 1/48 F-16CJ Block 50 - 61098 (2007 All New Tooling)
    ★ Cooger Modelling Club Membership : / @callsigncooger
    ★ Partnership & Sponsorship Inquiries : cooger73@gmail.com
    Callsign
    Cooger
    #StopTheWar #PrayForUkraine #F16FightingFalcon

КОМЕНТАРІ • 34

  • @bobkrulish732
    @bobkrulish732 5 місяців тому

    I am currently building the Tamiya kit and really enjoy the detail and the amazing fit. Such a pleasure to work with.

  • @TheModelGuy
    @TheModelGuy Рік тому +6

    Having build both of these kits, I have to give the edge to Kinetic. It goes together really nice and has great decals out of the box. The only two negative things I can say is no seat belts/pilot and that weird 1980s engine piece. Otherwise the Kinetic detail surpasses Tamiya. Which I hope it would if you are doing a kit 16 years later.

    • @jayhendrix7343
      @jayhendrix7343 10 місяців тому

      Im building the KG kit atm and the model is gorgeous but these instructions are great for toilet paper lol

  • @benchlife9375
    @benchlife9375 Рік тому

    Built both ...both great kits ...I give tamiya a slight edge for weapons and kinetic a slight edge for exhaust nozzle. The detail on both are close but the kinetic one is a lil more detailed. I got my kinetic F-16C FOR 39+ SHIPPING and Tamiya CJ for 42 + Shipping . I would recommend both but if you can only get one go for the kinetic C for 39 and dig in the stash for aim 120 and aim 9 ...both are not great on the kinetic kit but the gbu and tanks are nice. You also get a sniper pod in the kinetic Falcon 👍 along with the jammer and older pods. I think the Kinetic A and D are around 72$ + shipping. All great kits to have a blast with HAPPY SCALING 👋.

  • @rogust76
    @rogust76 Рік тому

    옆에 대놓고 분석하니 너무 신랄하게 까이는데요. ㅎㅎ

  • @여행풍경-r4n
    @여행풍경-r4n Рік тому +6

    2022년이 2007년을 이기지 못하는.. 휠베이 쪽의 '일부' 디테일을 제외하면 키네틱의 완패로 보입니다. 가격 메리트라도 있으면 몰라도...

  • @ck1737
    @ck1737 Рік тому +1

    저는 만약 나의 인성 과 실력을 실험해 보고 싶다면 카네틱을, 나는 오늘 좀 그냥 멍 때리고 시키면 시키는 데로 한다면 타미야를..

  • @jaehyungahn691
    @jaehyungahn691 Рік тому

    쿠거님의 확인사살..

  • @전보라-y5g
    @전보라-y5g Рік тому +1

    저는 비싸도 무조건 타미야 ㅎㅎ

  • @royalmace9386
    @royalmace9386 Рік тому

    불철주야 지갑을 지켜주셔서 감사합니다 🫡

  • @davidwhiteley3879
    @davidwhiteley3879 11 місяців тому +3

    Brilliant - wish more channels would feature this kind o comparison!

  • @paingain9057
    @paingain9057 Рік тому +3

    건프라는 반다이, 밀러터리,에어로는 타미야.

  • @cfranko1860
    @cfranko1860 9 місяців тому +2

    To tell you the simple answer, if I wanted to build a NATO MLU viper I'd buy Kinetic and if I wanted to build a USAF viper I'd buy Tamiya. I've heard good things about the Kinetic one and I've already build the Tamiya ANG version, which was excellent.

  • @apov6744
    @apov6744 5 місяців тому +1

    More detailed is kinetic but i prefer Tamiya up to 30years as a plastic models, rc electric, rc with nitrous etc! Love Tamiya ❤

  • @fidelrincon2993
    @fidelrincon2993 Рік тому +3

    Tamiya

  • @raymadani270
    @raymadani270 Рік тому +2

    Thank you for the comparison Mister Cooger
    Tamiya all day long

  • @조태성-r9s
    @조태성-r9s Рік тому +1

    각자 장단점이 명확하게 보이는 리뷰네요. 고생하셨습니다.
    저는 좋은 추억을 가진 타미야 카트로 가보겠습니다. 개인적으로 디테일이 좋더라도 분할이 제대로 되어있지 않다면 의미가 없다는것을 멩 f--35를 만들면서 절실히 느꼈거든요

  • @Steve-jl2wi
    @Steve-jl2wi Рік тому +3

    Tamiya

  • @shengyi1701
    @shengyi1701 10 місяців тому +1

    I have the 2022 RSAF and Texas ANG F-16Cs from Kinetic in 1/48 and all the Tamiya 1/48 F-16s from 2007 and on. Still haven’t built them. Still got a partially-built kinetic F-16D kit (old mould) but this vid will make me wanna build them at the same time!

  • @ModelTip
    @ModelTip Місяць тому

    Good comparison video !

  • @青地秀通
    @青地秀通 Рік тому +1

    パーツ単体で見るとキネも良いけど、組んだ時のF-16らしさはタミヤ製。

  • @darkwood777
    @darkwood777 5 місяців тому +1

    Tamiya

  • @LTModels
    @LTModels 8 місяців тому

    As far as accuracy, kinetic energy. But fitment and enjoyment….. Tamiya. Kinetic requires a little elbow grease but its a great choice as well.

  • @Jolly-Rogers
    @Jolly-Rogers Рік тому +1

    에어로의 명가 타미야에 한표 던집니다

  • @soap_II
    @soap_II Рік тому

    음... 저는 키네틱이 더 끌리긴 하네요... 키네틱의 몰드가 더 선명한거같고, 타미야는 고증은 좋을지언정, 너무 몰드들이 뭉개진거같다는 느낌을 주네요... 일부 오류야 메꾸고 다시 그려주면 되고... 타미야 패널라인 싹 다시 파주는것보단 키네틱이 낫네요... 단점은... 키네틱의 무장 분할인데, 무장이야 잔뜩 쟁여놓다보니 저한테는 단점도 아니군요...

  • @jdcookiemonster
    @jdcookiemonster Рік тому

    Tamiya for fitment but nice looking details on the kinetic kit.

  • @tonydrake462
    @tonydrake462 Рік тому

    I'd got kinetic - if it builds as well as their F104 it'll be brilliant.

  • @mkkim0425
    @mkkim0425 Рік тому +1

    키네틱 렌딩기어 베이를 타미야에 이식 가능할가요?

    • @CallsignCooger
      @CallsignCooger  Рік тому

      GE엔진 사양의 부품을 세팅하면 얼추 될 것 같은데...엄청난 삽질을 할 것 같아서 좀 두렵습니다. ^^;

    • @CallsignCooger
      @CallsignCooger  Рік тому

      복좌형 키트 구입하게되면 한번 해볼께요 ^^

  • @СергейАртёмчик-ю5н

    .....подождемммм MINIBASE....-сравнимммм.....

  • @andrewivan9954
    @andrewivan9954 9 місяців тому +1

    Tamiya ever best! ❤❤❤ Kinetic is so-so brand... 😊

  • @ashby1672
    @ashby1672 Рік тому +1

    디테일도 그렇지만 오래 살고 싶어서 타미야 선택할 겁니다. 키네틱 건들면 수명 줄어들 거 같아요...