Rams Resolve: The Story Of The 2002 Season | Rams Yearbook

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 жов 2024
  • The 2002 Rams season could have been a lost cause, but the Rams met the challenge by displaying heart, character and resolve. This is the story of the 2002 season.
    Subscribe to the LA Rams Channel: bit.ly/3d9IrHe
    For More Exclusive Content follow the Rams:
    Twitter: ramsnfl
    Instagram: rams
    Facebook: Rams/
    Website: www.therams.com
    Get the latest on the LA Rams news, photos, and more by downloading the app!
    Android: bit.ly/3fOjmU7
    iOS: apple.co/2Nrijgw
    #LosAngelesRams #LARams #Rams #NFL

КОМЕНТАРІ • 29

  • @ericsigersmith2831
    @ericsigersmith2831 3 роки тому +10

    Not even a rams fan but gotta love the old nfl films team yearbooks they should do one for every year!

  • @redneved93
    @redneved93 3 роки тому +8

    This was actually my first season being a Rams fan. It broke my little 9 year old heart but I've stuck with them ever since #MobSquad4Life

  • @The_official_erik
    @The_official_erik 3 роки тому +5

    Thats what the rams are about. Go RAMS!!!

  • @Lonebadger567
    @Lonebadger567 10 місяців тому +2

    Those were the best uniforms in the nfl they should have never changed them

  • @noticeablyfat2412
    @noticeablyfat2412 3 роки тому +8

    still got my marc bulger jersey, guy was underrated

  • @hello-vs4me
    @hello-vs4me 3 роки тому +7

    Love 💘the old rams and the new LA rams

  • @Manimal805
    @Manimal805 3 роки тому +8

    man I miss those colors 👍😎 Rams House baby

  • @stantmf4702
    @stantmf4702 3 роки тому +12

    The 2002 St. Louis Rams season could have been a lost cause, but the St. Louis Rams met the challenge by displaying heart, character and resolve. This is the story of the 2002 season.

  • @larryloveless2967
    @larryloveless2967 2 роки тому +6

    Now we know the only reason the Rams left St. Louis was due to an indemnifciation agreement signed by Stan Krownke that NFL owners thought was going to protect them from lawsuit damages awarded to St. Louis but actually only covers litigation fees and now Kroenke is balking even over covering those expenses. St. Louis approved for funding a new outdoor riverfront stadium but Kroenke had already bought land for SOFI years prior. Therefore St. Louis could only work through the NFL and its relocation bylaws. St. LOUIS loved the Rams even through its 2-14 seasons in recent years. The St. Louis went from the Greatest Show on Turf to loveable losers with well liked players. NFL owners changed their votes away from keeping the Rams in STL to allowing Kroenke to move to L.A. based on what they thought was their protection from the indemnification agreement.

    • @AES09
      @AES09 2 роки тому

      Okie dokie

  • @chrisuncleahmad
    @chrisuncleahmad 3 роки тому +5

    Do you have the 2003 Rams Yearbook (Gateway to the Best)?

  • @HouseOfMoths
    @HouseOfMoths 3 роки тому +2

    @rams
    We need: nickell robey coleman
    ....back on the mobsquad

    • @HouseOfMoths
      @HouseOfMoths 3 роки тому

      @@Cora956 idk
      If we don't get slotgod back I will be very upset

    • @bhmch39
      @bhmch39 3 роки тому +1

      Love NRC

  • @nearzachattack
    @nearzachattack 2 роки тому

    I was at week 4 against the Cowboys

  • @user-td4fe5ng6u
    @user-td4fe5ng6u 3 роки тому +12

    Could have been a dynasty if we beat the patriots

    • @chevyavila9597
      @chevyavila9597 3 роки тому

      Would they have relocated back home had they built a dynasty? Who knows

    • @alexrosales7907
      @alexrosales7907 3 роки тому +1

      @@chevyavila9597 no their fanbase would be larger and stadium would have stayed packed. The only reason they left is attendance

    • @starstatik
      @starstatik Рік тому +2

      @@alexrosales7907 We offered the rams a new stadium but yet they still moved

    • @alexrosales7907
      @alexrosales7907 Рік тому

      @StarStatik with a low attendance. Didn't matter. Rams have been top 10 in attendance since coming to LA

    • @Lonebadger567
      @Lonebadger567 9 місяців тому

      @alexrosales7907 That wasn't the only reason they moved lol. The nfl wanted a team in LA it was a business decision made by a corrupt owner to better profit the nfl. The only reason attendance was low was because when the rumors came out that Kroenke was moving the team people stopped going to games. Kronke was going to move the team regardless it didn't matter. He just made the team a horrible team year after year so people would stop going to games.
      But I get it. It's a business move. I'm glad you guys got your team back. I just hate Kroenke, St. Louis got screwed and the nfl hates St. Louis.

  • @Lonebadger567
    @Lonebadger567 10 місяців тому +2

    Gosh I hate Kroenke stole my team from me. Wish they were still in Stl

    • @Chorizero2369
      @Chorizero2369 9 місяців тому +3

      Rams are LA’s true NFL team tho. They’ve had more successful history in La than in St. Louis and when the rams would go to California to play teams there rams fans from LA would go to San Diego or SF to chant bring back the rams to LA

  • @kevinburke6055
    @kevinburke6055 Рік тому

    They shouidve kept Bulger in there he started and had the momentum to turn season around. But I guess Warner still had the pedigree. Martz didn’t make same mistake the next year after Warner was awful in first game went to Bulger they won 13 games.

  • @erics2739
    @erics2739 3 роки тому +1

    War eagle 🦅!

  • @yoboylanden4160
    @yoboylanden4160 3 роки тому +1

    Why did you trade jared goff like really

    • @user-td4fe5ng6u
      @user-td4fe5ng6u 3 роки тому +4

      For the way he was playing we were paying him WAY too much, Stafford is easily better, and he was turning the ball over every game.

    • @epiclegend4162
      @epiclegend4162 3 роки тому +3

      @@user-td4fe5ng6u Yeah we did not need him his best season was 2018 and then he was at best just decent.