Don't ever compare Hinduism or sanatan dharma to radical things because Hinduism does not encourage to convert anyone or does not encourage to kill somebody...🚩🚩🚩 Jay shree ram... If you wanna go through a enjoyable way to moksha then search about vitthal rakhumai or Saint dyneshar Mauli... 🙏🙏
He listens form one 👂 and after its been recorded everything is erased from his mind! He doesn't remember anything he just wanna milk some views from india
@@hindustani5793 If he really just wanted to milk views he could have just reacted to videos but he is reading Bhagwat Geeta and anyone who doesn't want to learn about a religion will never take an actual text to read.
As long as you are a seeker, you will still be a Hindu Even if you enjoy your way of attaining the truth, which is enjoying your journey to get there & not focus on which path to take. Hinduism has a diverse pool of philosophies
This is the most stupid and ignorant comment , yet I see people repost it over and over again .. as a Hindu myself it goes against the basic tenets of sanatan dharm . If the atman is a part of the Brahman , literally every living and non living thing is part of Brahman . Krishna when he said “I am Brahman” was echoing this philosophy, rather than claim he is God . Actually it is utter stupidity to misinterpret his words and sound exactly like Christians and Muslims who also claim the same thing for Jesus and Allah Goes to show the number of ignorant Hindus out there by the number of times I have seen this comment reposted😅
@@sks4173 you don't know what's going on really? You want hindu ppl to get converted. If there're no hindutva warriors, You can see india become a christian country after 20 years
" A Fellow Hindu said this, that there is no such concept exists as Conversion in our Faith but The People just return seeking their Absolute Eternal Truth which is called Sanathana Satya and Dharma is The Righteous Duty of Protecting it as Their Way of Life. for example, a Plant Produces a White Flower has its identity and it must not be changed no matter how much people try to Color it other ways, It's The Righteous People's Divine Duty to keep it as it is since it's the Creation of God. His/Her Decision must never be Interfered or Challenged... Let The People Evolve with Experience n Time instead of changing the Color of their Divine Spirit... "
Plant or Tree cannot change the color of the leaf on their own because they lack a Brain, Consciousness, Sentience and Intelligence. But, humans can change their DNA naturally on their own and consciously through spiritual processes. No other creature can do this.
You are the most open minded person I have ever seen you always find the opportunities to learn something new. Your thoughts are so on point that it almost feels like some wise guru giving his teachings. Wish you the very best luck for reaching your goals❤
Definitely a spot on explanation on how the Geeta can be optimally experienced. One NEEDS to study it with their undivided attention and focus instead of breezing through it and making it pointless.
I just wanted to say thank you for going on this journey, it has inspired me to go through it myself as a hindu by birth. I have no knowledge of my religion, and I'm loving this journey. I know you have a strong connection to Hanuman, so I suggest listening to the hanuman chalisa rendition by hariharan. I rank it as the most beautiful. Listen to it every morning, a beautiful way to start every day
I just started my journey to delve deeper into Hinduism after being a non-believer for the past 2 decades thinking of myself as a disillusioned born Hindu and so happy to have found you here, literally following you as a guru in my journey, not just as a subscriber
You're definitely doing a great job by revealing the videos of such great and underrated content creators. Like this channel(*Dharma Speaks) and Om Dhumatkar
You are some what right, bhagwat geeta you gotta read, understand every words meanings, what does the verses mean, what's the context. What's the book is trying to teach you. There are many metaphors. Someone might misunderstand or mistranslate. Then whole context and meaning changes. You gotta concentrate a lot while reading being neutral by forgetting about everything you know until now.
There are officially 21-22 different Qurans themselves with drastic changes in them. For example, in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, the Quran they follow is a different Quran than one people from Africa reads. Some scholar guy compared all these available qurans and found 70,000-90,000 differences in those. So to answer your question, no, the Quran is not preserved, and many even claim it was just the creation of people.
This is a lie. The Quran is preserved in its original form. It's the only religious text that is preserved. Torah: The Torah (Law) is the name of the book of Prophet Moses. The Jews and the Christians use this name for the first 5 books of Old Testament: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy. Together they are called ‘Pentateuch’. Pentateuch was believed to have been written by Moses. He is probably to be dated in the fifteenth to thirteenth century BC and the belief that he wrote Pentateuch continued up to the 18th century CE; and this was in-spite of the inherent impossibilities of this belief, like the account of the death of Moses himself. In the 18th century, some Christian scholars started what is now known as ‘higher criticism’. Their views are now accepted by majority of Christians. They proved that the Pentateuch was not written by Moses; that it is not even work of a single man or single era; that it contains the works of unknown number of people right up-to 1,000 years after the death of Moses. Rev. W. K. L. Clarke in his Concise Bible Commentary1 gives the following timetable and sequence of editing: The book says that by the end of the 19th century, it was generally recognized that there were four main sources in the Pentateuch, to be assigned to 9th, 8th, 7th and 5th or 4th centuries BC respectively. “The first book at the Pentateuch shows three characteristic styles illustrated by Genesis l, Genesis 2 and Deuteronomy and the documents marked by these styles were first to be noticed.” "The obviously early source begins in Gen. 2:4. This source is called ‘J’ after the ‘J’ of Jehovah (pronounced Jahweh). 'J’ is generally thought to have been put into written form about 850 BC. “Another source...is D, so called from the book of Deuteronomy, which was the book law discovered in Josiah’s reign. “The third source is called Priestly document, P for short. The writer is particularly interested in legislation and most of the laws of Exodus and all those of Leviticus and Numbers belong to P. A large part of the Priestly Code is believed to have been composed in Babylonia and brought to Jerusalem by Ezra in 397 BC. How much of P was omitted in final compilation of Pentateuch we have no means of knowing. Nothing has been said yet about a subordinate source found in Lev. 17-28 and known as the Code of Holiness, H for short. It was adopted into P but evidently had a separate history... Opinion is divided as to its date, whether it was written before 586 or whether exiled priests after the fall of the city committed to writing the Temple traditions ..:” “Now comes the fourth source. After taking P, D and J from the Pentateuch a considerable amount of material remains, parallel to J, but in Genesis using Elohim for God and not Yahweh. This non-P Elohim matter begins in Gen. 20: 1-7... Altogether E is more mature religiously and is thought to have reached written form about 750 BC” These are the four main sources of Pentateuch. How they were compiled to form the Pentateuch? “The first step was to combine J and E. This must have been done after the fall of Samaria in 721 BC. The two were combined in a document which is called JE.” “Then in 621 Deuteronomy was discovered, or at least a large part of it. The next stage was to put JE, and D together. This will have taken place during the exile... A perceptible amount of editing of JE took place.” “P was written in Babylonia and brought to Jerusalem by Ezra in 397 BC. Later, editors used it as a frame work and incorporated JED, thus producing the Pentateuch ... in about 300 BC.” We might as well sum it up in the words of the commentator himself. “Probably a multitude of persons have combined to give us Genesis (etc.), covering in their lives a span of 1,000 years.” And this book, compiled 1,000 years after Moses is called the Book of Moses! But it appears from the same authorities that probably it was not attributed to Moses till 200 BC! Even that minority of the Christian scholars which still holds fast to the theory of Mosaic authorship of the Pentateuch has to admit that it must have been re-written by the subsequent generations to modernize the language. This concession has to be given because “it is hardly probable that the Hebrew of Moses’ day was like that of Biblical Hebrew.” (See the Westminster Dictionary of the Bible under “Pentateuch”) The Bible itself states, explicitly or implicitly, that the Torah was destroyed twice: First, in the time of Nebuchadnezzer; after a long time, it was restored or re-written by Ezra. Second time, it was ruthlessly destroyed by Antiochus. Nothing is known as to how it was restored. The early Christian scholars believed that there was no proof of the authenticity of the Old Testament until Jesus came and confirmed it. But, in fact, Jesus has never confirmed the Old Testament (which comprises of 39 or 46 books). He speaks about the authenticity of the ‘Law’ only. If further proof is needed, one has only to compare the old manuscripts known as ‘Dead Sea Scroll’ with the relevant parts of the present Old Testament, to find out how great the differences are between the two.2 We are not concerned with the judgment as to which writing is more acceptable. What we are concerned with is the fact that the scribes were free long before the coming of Jesus to add, subtract, change and alter the texts of the books attributed to the Israeli prophets including the book or books of Prophet Musa (a.s.). Bible: A century after the launch of the church, hundreds of letters and books explained who Jesus was and what he did and how to live as his follower. It became clear that some of these writings weren't authentic. Church members began to ask which books should be followed and which ignored. Eventually, Christian church leaders worldwide gathered to answer major questions, including which books should be regarded as "Scripture." These gatherings included the Council of Nicea in A.D. 325 and the First Council of Constantinople in A.D. 381After a few decades of debate, these councils largely settled which books should be included in the Bible. This show that bible that you follow is not actually the word of god but stories written by people who came after jesus. So there is a lot of chance for error.
This is a lie. The Quran is preserved in its original form. It's the only religious text that is preserved. Torah: The Torah (Law) is the name of the book of Prophet Moses. The Jews and the Christians use this name for the first 5 books of Old Testament: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy. Together they are called ‘Pentateuch’. Pentateuch was believed to have been written by Moses. He is probably to be dated in the fifteenth to thirteenth century BC and the belief that he wrote Pentateuch continued up to the 18th century CE; and this was in-spite of the inherent impossibilities of this belief, like the account of the death of Moses himself. In the 18th century, some Christian scholars started what is now known as ‘higher criticism’. Their views are now accepted by majority of Christians. They proved that the Pentateuch was not written by Moses; that it is not even work of a single man or single era; that it contains the works of unknown number of people right up-to 1,000 years after the death of Moses. Rev. W. K. L. Clarke in his Concise Bible Commentary1 gives the following timetable and sequence of editing: The book says that by the end of the 19th century, it was generally recognized that there were four main sources in the Pentateuch, to be assigned to 9th, 8th, 7th and 5th or 4th centuries BC respectively. “The first book at the Pentateuch shows three characteristic styles illustrated by Genesis l, Genesis 2 and Deuteronomy and the documents marked by these styles were first to be noticed.” "The obviously early source begins in Gen. 2:4. This source is called ‘J’ after the ‘J’ of Jehovah (pronounced Jahweh). 'J’ is generally thought to have been put into written form about 850 BC. “Another source...is D, so called from the book of Deuteronomy, which was the book law discovered in Josiah’s reign. “The third source is called Priestly document, P for short. The writer is particularly interested in legislation and most of the laws of Exodus and all those of Leviticus and Numbers belong to P. A large part of the Priestly Code is believed to have been composed in Babylonia and brought to Jerusalem by Ezra in 397 BC. How much of P was omitted in final compilation of Pentateuch we have no means of knowing. Nothing has been said yet about a subordinate source found in Lev. 17-28 and known as the Code of Holiness, H for short. It was adopted into P but evidently had a separate history... Opinion is divided as to its date, whether it was written before 586 or whether exiled priests after the fall of the city committed to writing the Temple traditions ..:” “Now comes the fourth source. After taking P, D and J from the Pentateuch a considerable amount of material remains, parallel to J, but in Genesis using Elohim for God and not Yahweh. This non-P Elohim matter begins in Gen. 20: 1-7... Altogether E is more mature religiously and is thought to have reached written form about 750 BC” These are the four main sources of Pentateuch. How they were compiled to form the Pentateuch? “The first step was to combine J and E. This must have been done after the fall of Samaria in 721 BC. The two were combined in a document which is called JE.” “Then in 621 Deuteronomy was discovered, or at least a large part of it. The next stage was to put JE, and D together. This will have taken place during the exile... A perceptible amount of editing of JE took place.” “P was written in Babylonia and brought to Jerusalem by Ezra in 397 BC. Later, editors used it as a frame work and incorporated JED, thus producing the Pentateuch ... in about 300 BC.” We might as well sum it up in the words of the commentator himself. “Probably a multitude of persons have combined to give us Genesis (etc.), covering in their lives a span of 1,000 years.” And this book, compiled 1,000 years after Moses is called the Book of Moses! But it appears from the same authorities that probably it was not attributed to Moses till 200 BC! Even that minority of the Christian scholars which still holds fast to the theory of Mosaic authorship of the Pentateuch has to admit that it must have been re-written by the subsequent generations to modernize the language. This concession has to be given because “it is hardly probable that the Hebrew of Moses’ day was like that of Biblical Hebrew.” (See the Westminster Dictionary of the Bible under “Pentateuch”) The Bible itself states, explicitly or implicitly, that the Torah was destroyed twice: First, in the time of Nebuchadnezzer; after a long time, it was restored or re-written by Ezra. Second time, it was ruthlessly destroyed by Antiochus. Nothing is known as to how it was restored. The early Christian scholars believed that there was no proof of the authenticity of the Old Testament until Jesus came and confirmed it. But, in fact, Jesus has never confirmed the Old Testament (which comprises of 39 or 46 books). He speaks about the authenticity of the ‘Law’ only. If further proof is needed, one has only to compare the old manuscripts known as ‘Dead Sea Scroll’ with the relevant parts of the present Old Testament, to find out how great the differences are between the two.2 We are not concerned with the judgment as to which writing is more acceptable. What we are concerned with is the fact that the scribes were free long before the coming of Jesus to add, subtract, change and alter the texts of the books attributed to the Israeli prophets including the book or books of Prophet Musa (a.s.). Bible: A century after the launch of the church, hundreds of letters and books explained who Jesus was and what he did and how to live as his follower. It became clear that some of these writings weren't authentic. Church members began to ask which books should be followed and which ignored. Eventually, Christian church leaders worldwide gathered to answer major questions, including which books should be regarded as "Scripture." These gatherings included the Council of Nicea in A.D. 325 and the First Council of Constantinople in A.D. 381After a few decades of debate, these councils largely settled which books should be included in the Bible. This show that bible that you follow is not actually the word of god but stories written by people who came after jesus. So there is a lot of chance for error. No one knows the origin of hindu texts. If it was a true religion and had an eternal truth then it should have been available for everyone. Why is that tge lower cast hindus are not allowed to read the vedas? Why is it only for selected people? Beacuse if it truly was from god then it should be for all his people.
The Birmingham Qur’an Manuscript contains parts of surahs 18-20 of the Islamic holy book, written on parchment in an early form of Arabic script known as Ḥijāzi. The result of radiocarbon dating of the parchment on which the text is written places the manuscript in the period between 568 and 645 with 95.4% probability. Bosworth Smith, a Catholic historian and biographer, stated in his provocative book, Mohammed and Mohammedanism, “We have a book absolutely unique in its origin, in its preservation, and in the chaos of its contents, but on the authenticity of which no one has ever been able to cast a serious doubt.” Philip Hitti, a Maronite Christian from Lebanon and a leading scholar of Arabic Studies in the United States, states that “Modern critics agree that the copies current today are almost exact replicas of the original mother-text as compiled by Zayd, and that, on the whole, the text of the Koran today is as Muhammad produced it. As some Semitic scholar remarked, there are probably more variations in the reading of one chapter of Genesis in Hebrew than there are in the entire Koran.” Stanley Lane Poole, a British orientalist, who was Professor of Arabic studies at Dublin University, wrote, “It is an immense merit in the Kur-an that there is no doubt as to its genuineness [...] that very word we can now read with full confidence that it has remained unchanged through nearly thirteen hundred years.” John Burton, professor of Arabic at the University of Edinburgh, says in the closing sentence of his magnum opus, The Collection of the Qur’ān, that the Qur’ān as we have it today, is “the text which has come down to us in the form in which it was organized and approved by the Prophet [...]. What we have today in our hands is the Muṣḥaf of Muhammad.” Denise Masson, French islamologist, said in the introduction of her French translation of the Qur’ān, “Eventually, in spite of these points of debate, we can say that the text presently in our possession contains the criteria of a substantial fidelity.” Hamilton A. R. Gibb, one of the leading orientalists of the twentieth century, writes, “It seems reasonably well established that no material changes were introduced and that the original form and contents of Mohammed’s discourses were preserved with scrupulous precision.” Charles Cutler Torrey, an orientalist and Semitic scholar, stated that the Qur’ān “lies before us practically unchanged from the form which he himself [i.e. Muhammad] gave it.” R. V. C. Bodley, the American orientalist, proclaimed, “Today there is no possible doubt that the Koran which is read wherever there are Moslems is the same version as that translated from Hafsa’s master copy.”
Vishnu's Deception and Rape of Vrinda "..By that time, the son ofthe Ocean embraced Vrndā and kissed her face with great mental pleasure and satisfaction Vrndā too was extremely delighted in her mind on seeing her husband (really Vishnu in disguise) once again. Staying within the forest in his company for many days, she sported about. Once at the conclusion of the sexual intercourse, she saw him in the form of Visnu. Rebuking him angrily Vrndā spoke these words: Fie upon your conduct, O Hari, you commit adultery Skanda Purana 2.4.21.17-30 Indra Rapes the Wife of a Sage "In consequence of his licentious assault on Ahalya, Indra was cursed by Gautama, her husband, through which Indra got a green beard on his face.Through that curse of Kausika Indralost, also, his own testicles, which losswas afterwards (through the kindness of the other deities) made up by the substitution of the testicles of a ram."
Brahma Attempts to Rape His Own Daughter "Prajpati (i.e. Brahma) was formerly deluded,O Brahmanas . He desired like a lover of his own daughter named Vac (Speech) joyously This daughter of Prajapati became ashamed on noticing his lecherous love for her.hence she assumed the form of a Rohita deer. Inclined to have sexual dalliance with her, Brahma too took the form of a deer. As she went ahead in the guise of a female deer, he too followed her.On seeing him intent on having sexual intercourse with his daughter, all the deities condemned him: 'This Brahma is committing a deed that should not be done, i.e. attempt to have sexual union with one's own daughter." Skanda Purana 3.1.40.6-12
Hindu Gods Gangrape Married Woman "One day the sage Atri was performing tapas with his wifeAnasuya. Brahma, Visnu, and Siva came and offered him aboon, but Atri remained silent, meditating, Then the three god went to Anasuya. Siva had his linga [penis] in his hand,visnu was full of erotic feeling, and Brahma was beside himself with desire, saying to Anasuya, "Make love with me or I will die." When she heard his coarse speech. Anasuya made no reply,fir,although she feared the anger of gods,she was true to her husband. But they were overcome with delusion and they raped her by force. Then she became angry and she cursed Siva to be worshipped as a linga, Brahma to be worshipped inthe form of a head, and Visnu to be worshipped as feet, in order to ridicule them all." Bhavisya Purana 3:4:17:67-78, also see Wendy Doniger O'Flaherty,Siva: The Erotic Ascetic (Oxford Uni. Press 1973)
@@elfinfish7469 That is why you will not find any temple of brahma in the whole of India. And don't mind the person who nitpicks some parts of any religion to paint the whole religion in a bad light
Bro do not compare for the god sake...... Learn how swami vivekanand died, what things he can do with his spiritual powers...... That's on just another level @@Skyo.o
Love your take on enjoying the journey rather than being focused on the journey - this is actually one of the key takeaways of Bhagwad Gita that you are reviewing ❤
In Hinduism love also known as prem is most powerful thing and you can achieve anything by just loving everyone showing kindness and just remembering god or just doing good things you’ll achieve wisdom/ moksha …. Radhe Radhe ❤️🩹
I think what u said about enjoying the journey is somewhat true....i'd like to add that 'Learning' to enjoy the journey is also a part of journey. One can't just enjoy it by merely saying it. Learning it (what gradually happens by the grace of god i think) is part of sadhna .
Bro. I have been watching your video for few months, but boy oh boy "do you understand?". This video is the one where you are showing signs of understanding the reality. And I am glad to the core. Thank you for letting me have this blissful feeling.
So, God kept sending prophets to deliver his messages but they kept getting corrupted so he sent one final message to be delivered as the Quran which cannot be misinterpreted and corrupted? Oh, the irony.
And yes indeed it's the journey that is important that's why we Hindus have concept of endless life times which are part of our journey before attaining moksha.
There are three ways to achieve the ultimate goal in Hinduism: 1. Doing good/right things (Karma). E.g.: Being a good soilder/teacher/doctor in the right way 2. Knowing the the right thing/reality (Jnana). Knowing the true nature of reality. 3. Devotion/Love of God (Bhakti). Some sects consider this to be the only way in this era (Kali Yug)
6:06 it's actually wrong analogy inspired by thought of inferiority.you are infinite nothing is over you non is under you it's just need to be realized that's what mokhsa is . That's why we learn to realize has multiple ways to do all revolving around unconditional love and sacrifice for others.
If there is any religion that is very reliable in this modern times as well, it is for sure Hinduism (Sanatana Dharma). For Hindus, at the root level spirituality and science go hand in hand. I don't hesitate to say that the concepts of Hinduism are way forward to understand from modern science prospective. Hinduism does not encourage in 'BLIND BELIEF" concept unlike the other religions. It encourages people to question and question and keep questioning until you don't get satisfied from within..... Proud to be a Hindu...Jai Shree Ram 🚩🚩🚩
@@Unofficial-zd4cg Brother the answer is very simple..... it is for convenient conversation with other people. If you want an example here is one :- If I have to fill a form, lets say for a job I am required to use my "name" and not just say "I am you and you are me and a name is not necessary" it doesn't work like that, to navigate the material world you have to use material tools... philosophy is for the plane of mind and not for the material realm.
@@Amuse-tj4tp I understand this well, but why use the label 'Hindu'? It seems to reflect the ego identifying with a particular group, which creates division and, consequently, conflict. When someone says, "Proud to be a Hindu," what does that mean? It suggests the ego takes pride in following certain beliefs and practices perceived as superior. And what exactly is a 'Hindu' or 'Sanatani'? I have never encountered anyone identifying themselves as such in ancient texts or the Upanishads. Even in daily life, why label yourself as 'Hindu' when you could simply say you don't follow any religion? After all, Hinduism was never originally a religion.
Actually if you knew Sanskrit you would understand bhagvad gita 10 times better because its very hard to translate it even with 80℅ accuracy saying it as a indian hindu.
As a fellow Agnostic I would like to refer you Nasadaye Sukta from Rig Ved the oldest book of mankind. That I think is the earliest Provable Agnostic Thought or Idea
You are correct that it is the journey that's important. Shiva, krishna or Durga are called Trikaal darshi as they can see past present and future. So so even all your decisions and actions that you will take in future are already kind of predetermined. So even though its is already set when or how your soul reaches the ultimate truth the soul still has to make the journey. All in order to understand why the decision were made or those actions were taken by you. Even Matrix uses this as a conversation between Neo and the Oracle.
22:22 every journey ends at a destination. Journeys begin to reach a destination. Along the way some may have 100 experiences and some may have 10000000 experiences. Some may be in a rush and some take their time to enjoy and cherish the journey. But every being wants to get to that place of eternal peace eventually
You might dig the “Woven Energy” podcast run by a group of fellahs over on your side of the pond. That said, from our perspective anything within an 8 hour drive is “short distance travel.” He might not be as close as I think, but from the sounds of it I think you’d appreciate their approach to thinking. He has a lot of Eastern influence, it’s pretty cool hearing Damon explain history. Probably too long to do a reaction to, but just for personal consumption.
I think the problem with the dynamic truth is that it is too rigid by design, to make the process of belief easier it lays out straight and strict rules and u just have to follow them u dont need to sit down and think what the truth means to you because it is given on a silver plate by bible.then slowly these rules change and the truth become dynamic but with eternal truth it vague and philosophical and my truth might not be the same as u but when you understood the truth and ur own philosophy u feel enlightened.just like buddha who found his own truth And also salvation could be as easy as following a book can it? I think for salvation u NEED to look inward
You should do a video or two on Advaita Vedanta(a non-dual school of Vedanta) I just to follow that philosophy until I learned about Trika Shaivism. Swami Sarvaprinanda has some good videos on it but also Let’s Talk Religin has one on both Advaita and Trika Shaivism
i have seen hindus saying they also believe in crisht . as hundreds of rivers flows into the Ocean same goes with different religions,but untill and unless Cristian believe that jesus is the only way they get jacketed into belief and looses the whole picture. Hinduism states एक सत्य that truth is one but the way of achieving it may differ from person to person. For some krishna, shiva and for some Durga and Ganesh and Hanuman ❤
Yo bro please check out the Bhagwat Geeta explained by Dharma Speaks. He explains it all in English so you will be able to fully understand what it means.
It's either because you didn't understand the meanings in the first reading or there are multiple ways to interpret the text and so you're simply abusing the text.
Watch "IS SCIENCE COPYING HINDUISM" BY RAAZ BRAINCO which explains all the 10 avatars of vishnu and the similarities with Darwin's Theory of Evolution;There you'll know how This religion is full of symbolism
Bro try the below things once! Close your eyes, think about a problem which you are facing these days. No randomly opening a page of verse, and read. Then reply to me if you get any link. Jay Shree Krishna 🙏
Core of spirituality is conscious evolution of the DNA. When we can literally "Sense" and "Control" every cell in our body without any implants and naturally by birth, then we're closest to the source.
5:46 From my perspective, thinking of us as drop in ocean is easier to understand but still incomplete. Because this gives the idea that we have taken 'a part' of the whole. But instead what I understood is like since it [the Supreme God] is infinite and we are a 'conscience' part of that infinite, we are God himself. We just need to realise this.
As a Hindu, im a seeker and open to information from any insight of any tradition. It actually didn't take me that long to figure out that, unfortunately, Christianity, islam, and even Judaism were really just political constructs made for the sole purposes of crowd control by imperialistic regimes. If you are indeed anything to do with god or discovery of spiritual nature, why would mediums, ie those with access to insight into the spiritual world, be threatened and punished by stoning? Where is the search or investigation? Where is dialogue or the spirit of learning? I'm fully convinced that these systems are purely political for the very fact that they dont tolerate any viewpoint that is incongruent with their own. You see, amerindians, native Australians, Maoris, Mbuntu, kahunas, Shinto, Daoists, and Hindus, have no problem with anyone. But these three, with the one book and only true god have a problem with everyone. Why? Their missions either preceded or appeared rapidly after the wholesale murder, looting, and rapine of a society. Why? Yet they make it a point to stress to the world that they believe in love and peace! Buddhists never need to tell anyone anything about themselves. Everyone knows it already. It's simply called propaganda. We need to recognise political machinery and term it what it is. Christian seekers such as Emmanuel Swedenborg soon found parallels in his visions and spiritual journeys with a worldview not to dissimilar to the Hindu one. Because he was a seeker, not a believer. The queen of Sweden placed him under royal patronage and protection from non other than the christian church lest he be tried for heresy and burnt by the inquisitors. Now, isn't that something? To be protected by those who talk and preach about love and God. Interesting, isn't it.
thats why most hindus don't have a problem going to a dargah(islam place) or a church or a buddhist monsatary or a Gurudwara. they just see it as a holy place.
As a Hindu I am telling you that those Hindus are just idiots which you are mentioning. They don't know about Christians and Islamists views on Hindus and Hinduism.
Hinduism is the most open and tolerant religion... I am born Hindu.. but I dont worship anything nor go to any temple.. But I believe in doing my "Karma"... and your Karma is the only thing that matters.... your actions decide your future...
When you will start believing and practicing Hinduism it will be too late it takes time to go into that state years of practice of kriya yoga but it also depends on the intensity of the practice and even if you aren't able to fulfill in this life time you can continue it in another life time....and one can't compare Hinduism with a religion because it's not it's a way of life that's why it's called sanatan dharm (eternal duty)
you said at the end you want to "believe-in" you al ready started in a wrong foot. "sanatana dharma" widely known as Hinduism is an umbrella term for land of seekers....
in islam - if olla gave it to whom ever and it got corrupted but then again he should know the future , therefore we can say that time is greater than olla or whomever , how can you make the same mistake again and again .
20:14 Hi, I am not muslim myself but I think muslims also believe that Jesus (whom they call Isa) will come on some sort of Day of Judgement similar to the Christian belief. I guess this is a message that did not get corrupted.
Quran is not only preserved in its written form. it's memorised by millions of muslims around the globe from cover to cover, so if anyone changes or makes and mistake that will be immediately pointed out. Its also the only religious text and the only book to be memorised by millions. The Birmingham University also has the earliest manuscripts of quran that can be dated back to the time of prophet Muhammad pbuh.
Truth is not in the religion. One should strive to arrive at the truth. Sanatana Dharma is best suited as it lets people to choose their own path to truth.
Truth is never controversial it is always simple and straight. People weave lies around it to make it controversial because THEY CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!@@Skyo.o
The Quran is God (Allah)'s word to Prophet Muhammad Scribed into the Quran book by his Scribes Later after Muhammad, the notes were compiled into the Quran and the God's words were ilustrated and from the example of Prophet Muhammad's biography. And this where very human kings and ppl .... started deciding on interpreting and penning the Word of the God, in ways they could make sense ... and made it gospel as Islam we know of today.
Here I have to say that the journey of salvation on earth is suffering you cannot enjoy it if you enjoy the journey then you will generate karma and won't get salvation it's clearly explained in Bhagwad Gita. This life is full of suffering and enjoyment but these are all temporary so our goal is to get out of this concept of enjoyment and suffering that is done with yoga. Yoga can lead to salvation it has nothing to do with enjoyment of the journey because enjoyment is done through senses. But Shri Krishna says one must live life with devotion and only enjoy God by transcendental senses and not the journey in this material world.
Abrahmic and santana religions have very low to arguably no way of reconciliation with each other, both have fundamentally different approaches to everything!
Please react to Indian Archelogist Annica Mann in podcast with Ranveer Alhabadia you will get to know alot about Ancient India and Ancient Indian Spritituality.
19:54 The Doomsday Prophecy in the Abrahamic Texts is quite similar to the Avatāra of Kalki in Sanātana Dharma...... In the Revelation texts, The Second Coming of Christ is mentioned as Him coming on a White Horse to Judge. In the Hadith texts of Islam, it is described that Al-Mahdi would come on a White Horse during Doomsday. Interestingly, way before the Abrahamic Texts, the various Purāṇas of Sanātana Dharma talk about the Descent of Kalki Avatāra on a White Horse called Devdutt, around 427k years from now, when the Kali-Yuga ends. There's a lot more detail about this in the Purāṇas: The birth place of Kalki, His parents and their names, how He will train Himself in spiritual knowledge and ethical warfare, etc. The planetary positions are also mentioned in the Bhāgavata Mahā Purāṇa, indicating the time He would descend.
One should not compare abrahmic religion with indic religion. Cause for comparing we should have atleast some common or anti things but we are totally different. One can compare hindu baudh and jain , one can compare jews islam and christian.
I suggest you should watch videos of Sadhguru, shri shri ravi shankar, osho they are enlightened Indian guru which will be life changing experience for you
Don't ever compare Hinduism or sanatan dharma to radical things because Hinduism does not encourage to convert anyone or does not encourage to kill somebody...🚩🚩🚩 Jay shree ram... If you wanna go through a enjoyable way to moksha then search about vitthal rakhumai or Saint dyneshar Mauli... 🙏🙏
You have understood Hinduism better than most Hindus today!
He listens form one 👂 and after its been recorded everything is erased from his mind! He doesn't remember anything he just wanna milk some views from india
And who are you to decide who is better than whom?
No i dont buy that shit
@@hindustani5793 If he really just wanted to milk views he could have just reacted to videos but he is reading Bhagwat Geeta and anyone who doesn't want to learn about a religion will never take an actual text to read.
The goal n process to achieve if there is anything to achieve is to become a Yogi in doing all your actions
As long as you are a seeker, you will still be a Hindu
Even if you enjoy your way of attaining the truth, which is enjoying your journey to get there & not focus on which path to take.
Hinduism has a diverse pool of philosophies
Jesus:-i am the son of god
Muhammed:-i am the prophet of god
Krishna:- I AM GOD
Mohamed
Yeah, he is the one and only one who said he's the god himself after manifesting his some energy form as human.
This is the most stupid and ignorant comment , yet I see people repost it over and over again .. as a Hindu myself it goes against the basic tenets of sanatan dharm . If the atman is a part of the Brahman , literally every living and non living thing is part of Brahman . Krishna when he said “I am Brahman” was echoing this philosophy, rather than claim he is God . Actually it is utter stupidity to misinterpret his words and sound exactly like Christians and Muslims who also claim the same thing for Jesus and Allah
Goes to show the number of ignorant Hindus out there by the number of times I have seen this comment reposted😅
@@sks4173 you don't know what's going on really? You want hindu ppl to get converted. If there're no hindutva warriors, You can see india become a christian country after 20 years
A Hindu would say all three are Gods since the God resides in every person
" A Fellow Hindu said this, that there is no such concept exists as Conversion in our Faith but The People just return seeking their Absolute Eternal Truth which is called Sanathana Satya and Dharma is The Righteous Duty of Protecting it as Their Way of Life.
for example, a Plant Produces a White Flower has its identity and it must not be changed no matter how much people try to Color it other ways, It's The Righteous People's Divine Duty to keep it as it is since it's the Creation of God. His/Her Decision must never be Interfered or Challenged...
Let The People Evolve with Experience n Time instead of changing the Color of their Divine Spirit... "
Plant or Tree cannot change the color of the leaf on their own because they lack a Brain, Consciousness, Sentience and Intelligence. But, humans can change their DNA naturally on their own and consciously through spiritual processes. No other creature can do this.
that's why gita is life changing for alot of people
You are the most open minded person I have ever seen you always find the opportunities to learn something new. Your thoughts are so on point that it almost feels like some wise guru giving his teachings. Wish you the very best luck for reaching your goals❤
Your grasp and understanding of the subtle teachings of Hinduism is truly appreciable!!
' Who am i' by swami sarvapriyananda is a good lectures into upanishad and vedanta 😊
finally after 2 weeks, good to be back
Definitely a spot on explanation on how the Geeta can be optimally experienced. One NEEDS to study it with their undivided attention and focus instead of breezing through it and making it pointless.
I just wanted to say thank you for going on this journey, it has inspired me to go through it myself as a hindu by birth. I have no knowledge of my religion, and I'm loving this journey.
I know you have a strong connection to Hanuman, so I suggest listening to the hanuman chalisa rendition by hariharan. I rank it as the most beautiful. Listen to it every morning, a beautiful way to start every day
I just started my journey to delve deeper into Hinduism after being a non-believer for the past 2 decades thinking of myself as a disillusioned born Hindu and so happy to have found you here, literally following you as a guru in my journey, not just as a subscriber
You're definitely doing a great job by revealing the videos of such great and underrated content creators. Like this channel(*Dharma Speaks) and Om Dhumatkar
You are some what right, bhagwat geeta you gotta read, understand every words meanings, what does the verses mean, what's the context. What's the book is trying to teach you. There are many metaphors. Someone might misunderstand or mistranslate. Then whole context and meaning changes. You gotta concentrate a lot while reading being neutral by forgetting about everything you know until now.
I really love the curiosity you have to learn about new cultures .Keep it up bro and keep the fire of curiosity alive
love you from INDIA
There are officially 21-22 different Qurans themselves with drastic changes in them. For example, in India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, the Quran they follow is a different Quran than one people from Africa reads. Some scholar guy compared all these available qurans and found 70,000-90,000 differences in those. So to answer your question, no, the Quran is not preserved, and many even claim it was just the creation of people.
This is a lie. The Quran is preserved in its original form. It's the only religious text that is preserved.
Torah:
The Torah (Law) is the name of the book of Prophet Moses. The Jews and the Christians use this name for the first 5 books of Old Testament: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy. Together they are called ‘Pentateuch’. Pentateuch was believed to have been written by Moses. He is probably to be dated in the fifteenth to thirteenth century BC and the belief that he wrote Pentateuch continued up to the 18th century CE; and this was in-spite of the inherent impossibilities of this belief, like the account of the death of Moses himself.
In the 18th century, some Christian scholars started what is now known as ‘higher criticism’. Their views are now accepted by majority of Christians. They proved that the Pentateuch was not written by Moses; that it is not even work of a single man or single era; that it contains the works of unknown number of people right up-to 1,000 years after the death of Moses.
Rev. W. K. L. Clarke in his Concise Bible Commentary1 gives the following timetable and sequence of editing:
The book says that by the end of the 19th century, it was generally recognized that there were four main sources in the Pentateuch, to be assigned to 9th, 8th, 7th and 5th or 4th centuries BC respectively.
“The first book at the Pentateuch shows three characteristic styles illustrated by Genesis l, Genesis 2 and Deuteronomy and the documents marked by these styles were first to be noticed.”
"The obviously early source begins in Gen. 2:4. This source is called ‘J’ after the ‘J’ of Jehovah (pronounced Jahweh). 'J’ is generally thought to have been put into written form about 850 BC.
“Another source...is D, so called from the book of Deuteronomy, which was the book law discovered in Josiah’s reign.
“The third source is called Priestly document, P for short. The writer is particularly interested in legislation and most of the laws of Exodus and all those of Leviticus and Numbers belong to P. A large part of the Priestly Code is believed to have been composed in Babylonia and brought to Jerusalem by Ezra in 397 BC. How much of P was omitted in final compilation of Pentateuch we have no means of knowing. Nothing has been said yet about a subordinate source found in Lev. 17-28 and known as the Code of Holiness, H for short. It was adopted into P but evidently had a separate history... Opinion is divided as to its date, whether it was written before 586 or whether exiled priests after the fall of the city committed to writing the Temple traditions ..:”
“Now comes the fourth source. After taking P, D and J from the Pentateuch a considerable amount of material remains, parallel to J, but in Genesis using Elohim for God and not Yahweh. This non-P Elohim matter begins in Gen. 20: 1-7... Altogether E is more mature religiously and is thought to have reached written form about 750 BC”
These are the four main sources of Pentateuch. How they were compiled to form the Pentateuch?
“The first step was to combine J and E. This must have been done after the fall of Samaria in 721 BC. The two were combined in a document which is called JE.”
“Then in 621 Deuteronomy was discovered, or at least a large part of it. The next stage was to put JE, and D together. This will have taken place during the exile... A perceptible amount of editing of JE took place.”
“P was written in Babylonia and brought to Jerusalem by Ezra in 397 BC. Later, editors used it as a frame work and incorporated JED, thus producing the Pentateuch ... in about 300 BC.”
We might as well sum it up in the words of the commentator himself. “Probably a multitude of persons have combined to give us Genesis (etc.), covering in their lives a span of 1,000 years.” And this book, compiled 1,000 years after Moses is called the Book of Moses! But it appears from the same authorities that probably it was not attributed to Moses till 200 BC!
Even that minority of the Christian scholars which still holds fast to the theory of Mosaic authorship of the Pentateuch has to admit that it must have been re-written by the subsequent generations to modernize the language. This concession has to be given because “it is hardly probable that the Hebrew of Moses’ day was like that of Biblical Hebrew.” (See the Westminster Dictionary of the Bible under “Pentateuch”)
The Bible itself states, explicitly or implicitly, that the Torah was destroyed twice: First, in the time of Nebuchadnezzer; after a long time, it was restored or re-written by Ezra. Second time, it was ruthlessly destroyed by Antiochus. Nothing is known as to how it was restored.
The early Christian scholars believed that there was no proof of the authenticity of the Old Testament until Jesus came and confirmed it. But, in fact, Jesus has never confirmed the Old Testament (which comprises of 39 or 46 books). He speaks about the authenticity of the ‘Law’ only.
If further proof is needed, one has only to compare the old manuscripts known as ‘Dead Sea Scroll’ with the relevant parts of the present Old Testament, to find out how great the differences are between the two.2 We are not concerned with the judgment as to which writing is more acceptable. What we are concerned with is the fact that the scribes were free long before the coming of Jesus to add, subtract, change and alter the texts of the books attributed to the Israeli prophets including the book or books of Prophet Musa (a.s.).
Bible: A century after the launch of the church, hundreds of letters and books explained who Jesus was and what he did and how to live as his follower. It became clear that some of these writings weren't authentic. Church members began to ask which books should be followed and which ignored. Eventually, Christian church leaders worldwide gathered to answer major questions, including which books should be regarded as "Scripture." These gatherings included the Council of Nicea in A.D. 325 and the First Council of Constantinople in A.D. 381After a few decades of debate, these councils largely settled which books should be included in the Bible.
This show that bible that you follow is not actually the word of god but stories written by people who came after jesus. So there is a lot of chance for error.
This is a lie. The Quran is preserved in its original form. It's the only religious text that is preserved.
Torah:
The Torah (Law) is the name of the book of Prophet Moses. The Jews and the Christians use this name for the first 5 books of Old Testament: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy. Together they are called ‘Pentateuch’. Pentateuch was believed to have been written by Moses. He is probably to be dated in the fifteenth to thirteenth century BC and the belief that he wrote Pentateuch continued up to the 18th century CE; and this was in-spite of the inherent impossibilities of this belief, like the account of the death of Moses himself.
In the 18th century, some Christian scholars started what is now known as ‘higher criticism’. Their views are now accepted by majority of Christians. They proved that the Pentateuch was not written by Moses; that it is not even work of a single man or single era; that it contains the works of unknown number of people right up-to 1,000 years after the death of Moses.
Rev. W. K. L. Clarke in his Concise Bible Commentary1 gives the following timetable and sequence of editing:
The book says that by the end of the 19th century, it was generally recognized that there were four main sources in the Pentateuch, to be assigned to 9th, 8th, 7th and 5th or 4th centuries BC respectively.
“The first book at the Pentateuch shows three characteristic styles illustrated by Genesis l, Genesis 2 and Deuteronomy and the documents marked by these styles were first to be noticed.”
"The obviously early source begins in Gen. 2:4. This source is called ‘J’ after the ‘J’ of Jehovah (pronounced Jahweh). 'J’ is generally thought to have been put into written form about 850 BC.
“Another source...is D, so called from the book of Deuteronomy, which was the book law discovered in Josiah’s reign.
“The third source is called Priestly document, P for short. The writer is particularly interested in legislation and most of the laws of Exodus and all those of Leviticus and Numbers belong to P. A large part of the Priestly Code is believed to have been composed in Babylonia and brought to Jerusalem by Ezra in 397 BC. How much of P was omitted in final compilation of Pentateuch we have no means of knowing. Nothing has been said yet about a subordinate source found in Lev. 17-28 and known as the Code of Holiness, H for short. It was adopted into P but evidently had a separate history... Opinion is divided as to its date, whether it was written before 586 or whether exiled priests after the fall of the city committed to writing the Temple traditions ..:”
“Now comes the fourth source. After taking P, D and J from the Pentateuch a considerable amount of material remains, parallel to J, but in Genesis using Elohim for God and not Yahweh. This non-P Elohim matter begins in Gen. 20: 1-7... Altogether E is more mature religiously and is thought to have reached written form about 750 BC”
These are the four main sources of Pentateuch. How they were compiled to form the Pentateuch?
“The first step was to combine J and E. This must have been done after the fall of Samaria in 721 BC. The two were combined in a document which is called JE.”
“Then in 621 Deuteronomy was discovered, or at least a large part of it. The next stage was to put JE, and D together. This will have taken place during the exile... A perceptible amount of editing of JE took place.”
“P was written in Babylonia and brought to Jerusalem by Ezra in 397 BC. Later, editors used it as a frame work and incorporated JED, thus producing the Pentateuch ... in about 300 BC.”
We might as well sum it up in the words of the commentator himself. “Probably a multitude of persons have combined to give us Genesis (etc.), covering in their lives a span of 1,000 years.” And this book, compiled 1,000 years after Moses is called the Book of Moses! But it appears from the same authorities that probably it was not attributed to Moses till 200 BC!
Even that minority of the Christian scholars which still holds fast to the theory of Mosaic authorship of the Pentateuch has to admit that it must have been re-written by the subsequent generations to modernize the language. This concession has to be given because “it is hardly probable that the Hebrew of Moses’ day was like that of Biblical Hebrew.” (See the Westminster Dictionary of the Bible under “Pentateuch”)
The Bible itself states, explicitly or implicitly, that the Torah was destroyed twice: First, in the time of Nebuchadnezzer; after a long time, it was restored or re-written by Ezra. Second time, it was ruthlessly destroyed by Antiochus. Nothing is known as to how it was restored.
The early Christian scholars believed that there was no proof of the authenticity of the Old Testament until Jesus came and confirmed it. But, in fact, Jesus has never confirmed the Old Testament (which comprises of 39 or 46 books). He speaks about the authenticity of the ‘Law’ only.
If further proof is needed, one has only to compare the old manuscripts known as ‘Dead Sea Scroll’ with the relevant parts of the present Old Testament, to find out how great the differences are between the two.2 We are not concerned with the judgment as to which writing is more acceptable. What we are concerned with is the fact that the scribes were free long before the coming of Jesus to add, subtract, change and alter the texts of the books attributed to the Israeli prophets including the book or books of Prophet Musa (a.s.).
Bible: A century after the launch of the church, hundreds of letters and books explained who Jesus was and what he did and how to live as his follower. It became clear that some of these writings weren't authentic. Church members began to ask which books should be followed and which ignored. Eventually, Christian church leaders worldwide gathered to answer major questions, including which books should be regarded as "Scripture." These gatherings included the Council of Nicea in A.D. 325 and the First Council of Constantinople in A.D. 381After a few decades of debate, these councils largely settled which books should be included in the Bible.
This show that bible that you follow is not actually the word of god but stories written by people who came after jesus. So there is a lot of chance for error.
No one knows the origin of hindu texts. If it was a true religion and had an eternal truth then it should have been available for everyone. Why is that tge lower cast hindus are not allowed to read the vedas? Why is it only for selected people? Beacuse if it truly was from god then it should be for all his people.
The Birmingham Qur’an Manuscript contains parts of surahs 18-20 of the Islamic holy book, written on parchment in an early form of Arabic script known as Ḥijāzi.
The result of radiocarbon dating of the parchment on which the text is written places the manuscript in the period between 568 and 645 with 95.4% probability.
Bosworth Smith, a Catholic historian and biographer, stated in his provocative book, Mohammed and Mohammedanism, “We have a book absolutely unique in its origin, in its preservation, and in the chaos of its contents, but on the authenticity of which no one has ever been able to cast a serious doubt.”
Philip Hitti, a Maronite Christian from Lebanon and a leading scholar of Arabic Studies in the United States, states that “Modern critics agree that the copies current today are almost exact replicas of the original mother-text as compiled by Zayd, and that, on the whole, the text of the Koran today is as Muhammad produced it. As some Semitic scholar remarked, there are probably more variations in the reading of one chapter of Genesis in Hebrew than there are in the entire Koran.”
Stanley Lane Poole, a British orientalist, who was Professor of Arabic studies at Dublin University, wrote, “It is an immense merit in the Kur-an that there is no doubt as to its genuineness [...] that very word we can now read with full confidence that it has remained unchanged through nearly thirteen hundred years.”
John Burton, professor of Arabic at the University of Edinburgh, says in the closing sentence of his magnum opus, The Collection of the Qur’ān, that the Qur’ān as we have it today, is “the text which has come down to us in the form in which it was organized and approved by the Prophet [...]. What we have today in our hands is the Muṣḥaf of Muhammad.”
Denise Masson, French islamologist, said in the introduction of her French translation of the Qur’ān, “Eventually, in spite of these points of debate, we can say that the text presently in our possession contains the criteria of a substantial fidelity.”
Hamilton A. R. Gibb, one of the leading orientalists of the twentieth century, writes, “It seems reasonably well established that no material changes were introduced and that the original form and contents of Mohammed’s discourses were preserved with scrupulous precision.”
Charles Cutler Torrey, an orientalist and Semitic scholar, stated that the Qur’ān “lies before us practically unchanged from the form which he himself [i.e. Muhammad] gave it.”
R. V. C. Bodley, the American orientalist, proclaimed, “Today there is no possible doubt that the Koran which is read wherever there are Moslems is the same version as that translated from Hafsa’s master copy.”
Faster than light 😎🤏🏻
17:53 Because Hebrew, Greeks…all got to know the reality of Islam & Quran…😂 So Quran declared them as corrupted…(i feel pity for that 6 yo girl😢)
Vishnu's Deception and Rape of Vrinda
"..By that time, the son ofthe Ocean embraced Vrndā and kissed her face with great mental pleasure and satisfaction Vrndā too was extremely delighted in her
mind on seeing her husband (really Vishnu in disguise) once again. Staying within the forest in his company for many days, she sported about. Once at the conclusion of
the sexual intercourse, she saw him in the form of Visnu. Rebuking him angrily Vrndā spoke these words: Fie upon your conduct, O Hari, you commit adultery
Skanda Purana 2.4.21.17-30
Indra Rapes the Wife of a Sage
"In consequence of his licentious assault on Ahalya, Indra was cursed by Gautama, her husband, through which Indra got a green beard on his face.Through that curse of Kausika Indralost, also, his own testicles, which losswas afterwards (through the kindness of the other deities) made up by the substitution of the testicles of a ram."
Brahma Attempts to Rape His Own Daughter
"Prajpati (i.e. Brahma) was formerly deluded,O Brahmanas . He desired like a lover of his own daughter named Vac (Speech) joyously This daughter of Prajapati became ashamed on noticing his lecherous love for her.hence she assumed the form of a Rohita deer. Inclined to have sexual dalliance with her, Brahma too
took the form of a deer. As she went ahead in the guise of a female deer, he too followed her.On seeing him intent on having sexual intercourse with his daughter, all the deities condemned him: 'This Brahma is committing a deed that should not be done, i.e. attempt to
have sexual union with one's own daughter."
Skanda Purana 3.1.40.6-12
Hindu Gods Gangrape Married Woman
"One day the sage Atri was performing tapas with his wifeAnasuya. Brahma, Visnu, and Siva came and offered him aboon, but Atri remained silent, meditating, Then the three god went to Anasuya. Siva had his linga [penis] in his hand,visnu was full of erotic feeling, and Brahma was beside himself with desire, saying to Anasuya, "Make love with me or I will die."
When she heard his coarse speech. Anasuya made no reply,fir,although she feared the anger of gods,she was true to her husband. But they were overcome with delusion and they raped her by force. Then she became angry and she cursed Siva to be worshipped as a linga, Brahma to be worshipped inthe form of a head, and Visnu to be worshipped as feet, in order to ridicule them all."
Bhavisya Purana 3:4:17:67-78, also see Wendy Doniger O'Flaherty,Siva: The Erotic Ascetic (Oxford Uni. Press 1973)
@@elfinfish7469 That is why you will not find any temple of brahma in the whole of India. And don't mind the person who nitpicks some parts of any religion to paint the whole religion in a bad light
@@Amuse-tj4tpwhat about vishnu and siva
Good to have you back after long time. Great video and very basic but important stuff in this video
Comparing an ocean with ponds. Not even logical 😂
Please Do Reaction on "Swami Vivekanand's" UN historic speech.
You will get all the information about Hinduism and the essence of living life🙏🙏
Sadhguru still better
@Skyo.o thts wht uh think kid ..
I respect Sadguru but Vivekananda is voice of Krishna.
So there is no comparison between Satguru & vivekananda.
@@Skyo.olmao 😂
Bro do not compare for the god sake...... Learn how swami vivekanand died, what things he can do with his spiritual powers...... That's on just another level @@Skyo.o
Do a chapter by chapter discussion
That’s a great idea…
That’s actually a great idea!
A great Idea
Love your take on enjoying the journey rather than being focused on the journey - this is actually one of the key takeaways of Bhagwad Gita that you are reviewing ❤
the truth is always within us
In Hinduism love also known as prem is most powerful thing and you can achieve anything by just loving everyone showing kindness and just remembering god or just doing good things you’ll achieve wisdom/ moksha …. Radhe Radhe ❤️🩹
I think what u said about enjoying the journey is somewhat true....i'd like to add that 'Learning' to enjoy the journey is also a part of journey. One can't just enjoy it by merely saying it. Learning it (what gradually happens by the grace of god i think) is part of sadhna .
Bro. I have been watching your video for few months, but boy oh boy "do you understand?". This video is the one where you are showing signs of understanding the reality. And I am glad to the core. Thank you for letting me have this blissful feeling.
21:51 congratulations ,you cracked the code man
You are absolutely right. Religious texts are not mere stories(goes for most religions afaik). You have to read and contemplate.
So, God kept sending prophets to deliver his messages but they kept getting corrupted so he sent one final message to be delivered as the Quran which cannot be misinterpreted and corrupted? Oh, the irony.
Also, the last one was the most corrupt prophet of them all. 😂😂
@@RareSweetyTrue 😂😂😂
More number of times you read 'Vagbat Gita ' you find more points of knowledge. Every repeatation you find new valuable understanding.
Now I feel like watching your videos again, please watch more videos of Dharma Speaks .
And yes indeed it's the journey that is important that's why we Hindus have concept of endless life times which are part of our journey before attaining moksha.
In Hinduism you have to seek, learn and evolve. No spoonfeeding and force-feeding.
Mûslims don't believe Jesus as God but they believe Jesus as Prophet because if they don't do that then how they will claim Islam is best 😂🤣🤣
There are three ways to achieve the ultimate goal in Hinduism:
1. Doing good/right things (Karma). E.g.: Being a good soilder/teacher/doctor in the right way
2. Knowing the the right thing/reality (Jnana). Knowing the true nature of reality.
3. Devotion/Love of God (Bhakti). Some sects consider this to be the only way in this era (Kali Yug)
Great..U reacted To Dharma Speaks Channel. Plz react more videos of this channel. There is a Bhagwat Geeta Series. U will learn a lot. Thank You.
Thanks 🙏
My brother Understanding Dhram at its best. More power to you bro
At the moment I am listening to a series of talks on the Purusuktam which captures the same amazing philosophy in a slightly different way.
6:06 it's actually wrong analogy inspired by thought of inferiority.you are infinite nothing is over you non is under you it's just need to be realized that's what mokhsa is .
That's why we learn to realize has multiple ways to do all revolving around unconditional love and sacrifice for others.
If there is any religion that is very reliable in this modern times as well, it is for sure Hinduism (Sanatana Dharma).
For Hindus, at the root level spirituality and science go hand in hand. I don't hesitate to say that the concepts of Hinduism are way forward to understand from modern science prospective.
Hinduism does not encourage in 'BLIND BELIEF" concept unlike the other religions. It encourages people to question and question and keep questioning until you don't get satisfied from within.....
Proud to be a Hindu...Jai Shree Ram 🚩🚩🚩
So, here I question: Why do you identify yourself as a 'Hindu' when it is the exact opposite of what the philosophy teaches?
@@Unofficial-zd4cg Brother the answer is very simple..... it is for convenient conversation with other people. If you want an example here is one :- If I have to fill a form, lets say for a job I am required to use my "name" and not just say "I am you and you are me and a name is not necessary" it doesn't work like that, to navigate the material world you have to use material tools... philosophy is for the plane of mind and not for the material realm.
@@Amuse-tj4tp I understand this well, but why use the label 'Hindu'? It seems to reflect the ego identifying with a particular group, which creates division and, consequently, conflict. When someone says, "Proud to be a Hindu," what does that mean? It suggests the ego takes pride in following certain beliefs and practices perceived as superior. And what exactly is a 'Hindu' or 'Sanatani'? I have never encountered anyone identifying themselves as such in ancient texts or the Upanishads.
Even in daily life, why label yourself as 'Hindu' when you could simply say you don't follow any religion? After all, Hinduism was never originally a religion.
@@Unofficial-zd4cg do you have any suggestion?
@@a-fact-ed For what?
Actually if you knew Sanskrit you would understand bhagvad gita 10 times better because its very hard to translate it even with 80℅ accuracy saying it as a indian hindu.
As a fellow Agnostic I would like to refer you Nasadaye Sukta from Rig Ved the oldest book of mankind. That I think is the earliest Provable Agnostic Thought or Idea
Watch why hindu worship so many gods ep 32
You are correct that it is the journey that's important. Shiva, krishna or Durga are called Trikaal darshi as they can see past present and future. So so even all your decisions and actions that you will take in future are already kind of predetermined. So even though its is already set when or how your soul reaches the ultimate truth the soul still has to make the journey. All in order to understand why the decision were made or those actions were taken by you. Even Matrix uses this as a conversation between Neo and the Oracle.
22:22 every journey ends at a destination. Journeys begin to reach a destination. Along the way some may have 100 experiences and some may have 10000000 experiences. Some may be in a rush and some take their time to enjoy and cherish the journey. But every being wants to get to that place of eternal peace eventually
You might dig the “Woven Energy” podcast run by a group of fellahs over on your side of the pond. That said, from our perspective anything within an 8 hour drive is “short distance travel.” He might not be as close as I think, but from the sounds of it I think you’d appreciate their approach to thinking. He has a lot of Eastern influence, it’s pretty cool hearing Damon explain history. Probably too long to do a reaction to, but just for personal consumption.
I think the problem with the dynamic truth is that it is too rigid by design, to make the process of belief easier it lays out straight and strict rules and u just have to follow them u dont need to sit down and think what the truth means to you because it is given on a silver plate by bible.then slowly these rules change and the truth become dynamic but with eternal truth it vague and philosophical and my truth might not be the same as u but when you understood the truth and ur own philosophy u feel enlightened.just like buddha who found his own truth
And also salvation could be as easy as following a book can it? I think for salvation u NEED to look inward
22:00 You are a Bhakt (devotee). Bhakts don’t want liberation. We only want to serve Shree Krishna in his eternal realm.
Only through Bhakti can you enjoy the journey here and in next lives. Knowledge Yoga etc are very tough in Kaliyuga.
You should do a video or two on Advaita Vedanta(a non-dual school of Vedanta) I just to follow that philosophy until I learned about Trika Shaivism.
Swami Sarvaprinanda has some good videos on it but also Let’s Talk Religin has one on both Advaita and Trika Shaivism
Please react to The Indo-European History of Halloween by Project Shivoham.
i have seen hindus saying they also believe in crisht .
as hundreds of rivers flows into the Ocean same goes with different religions,but untill and unless Cristian believe that jesus is the only way they get jacketed into belief and looses the whole picture.
Hinduism states
एक सत्य
that truth is one but the way of achieving it may differ from person to person.
For some krishna, shiva and for some Durga and Ganesh and Hanuman ❤
Yo bro please check out the Bhagwat Geeta explained by Dharma Speaks. He explains it all in English so you will be able to fully understand what it means.
It is a popular saying that if you read Geeta and learn something then you read it some time later you will learn something new again and again
It's either because you didn't understand the meanings in the first reading or there are multiple ways to interpret the text and so you're simply abusing the text.
6:06 That is close to the Vishishtadvaita Darshan(philosophy) expounded by Ramanujacharya.
React to one more video from this channel it's "why Hindu gods are so human"
Watch "IS SCIENCE COPYING HINDUISM" BY RAAZ BRAINCO which explains all the 10 avatars of vishnu and the similarities with Darwin's Theory of Evolution;There you'll know how This religion is full of symbolism
Bro try the below things once!
Close your eyes, think about a problem which you are facing these days. No randomly opening a page of verse, and read.
Then reply to me if you get any link.
Jay Shree Krishna 🙏
One should be reading Darshana Shastras including all Hindu, Buddhist and Jain ones. Most of the Shastras have either agnostic or athiestic stands.
Yes there is only universal truth for every religion wheather you accept or not only ways are different
In Hinduism, it is believed that Vishnu will incarnate as Kalki, the tenth and final avatar, at the end of the current age or yuga.
Core of spirituality is conscious evolution of the DNA. When we can literally "Sense" and "Control" every cell in our body without any implants and naturally by birth, then we're closest to the source.
22:20 The way your describing that we should enjoy the process is what Krishna teaches too. Focus on the work and not the result
5:46 From my perspective, thinking of us as drop in ocean is easier to understand but still incomplete. Because this gives the idea that we have taken 'a part' of the whole. But instead what I understood is like since it [the Supreme God] is infinite and we are a 'conscience' part of that infinite, we are God himself. We just need to realise this.
Who is going to realise that?
@@Unofficial-zd4cg "We" as I wrote.
Both the concepts are derived from the Vedas
@@mehul050 Yes, who are 'we,' or rather, what is this 'we' that is going to realize this?
Read Asta vakra geetha. This book will give you a great insight of self. Life changing book.
As a Hindu, im a seeker and open to information from any insight of any tradition. It actually didn't take me that long to figure out that, unfortunately, Christianity, islam, and even Judaism were really just political constructs made for the sole purposes of crowd control by imperialistic regimes. If you are indeed anything to do with god or discovery of spiritual nature, why would mediums, ie those with access to insight into the spiritual world, be threatened and punished by stoning? Where is the search or investigation? Where is dialogue or the spirit of learning? I'm fully convinced that these systems are purely political for the very fact that they dont tolerate any viewpoint that is incongruent with their own.
You see, amerindians, native Australians, Maoris, Mbuntu, kahunas, Shinto, Daoists, and Hindus, have no problem with anyone. But these three, with the one book and only true god have a problem with everyone. Why?
Their missions either preceded or appeared rapidly after the wholesale murder, looting, and rapine of a society. Why? Yet they make it a point to stress to the world that they believe in love and peace!
Buddhists never need to tell anyone anything about themselves. Everyone knows it already. It's simply called propaganda. We need to recognise political machinery and term it what it is.
Christian seekers such as Emmanuel Swedenborg soon found parallels in his visions and spiritual journeys with a worldview not to dissimilar to the Hindu one. Because he was a seeker, not a believer. The queen of Sweden placed him under royal patronage and protection from non other than the christian church lest he be tried for heresy and burnt by the inquisitors. Now, isn't that something? To be protected by those who talk and preach about love and God. Interesting, isn't it.
Christianity - My way or Highway
Islam - My way or Highway
Sanatan Dharma - life cycle is never ending. Its a journey so its alwayas Highway.
thats why most hindus don't have a problem going to a dargah(islam place) or a church or a buddhist monsatary or a Gurudwara. they just see it as a holy place.
As a Hindu I am telling you that those Hindus are just idiots which you are mentioning. They don't know about Christians and Islamists views on Hindus and Hinduism.
You should watch " who am I " by Swami Sarvapriyananda.
Read Introduction to Bhagwat Gita by AC Bhaktivedant Shrila Prabhupad. It is short and easy for Bhakti Marg.
Hinduism is the most open and tolerant religion... I am born Hindu.. but I dont worship anything nor go to any temple.. But I believe in doing my "Karma"... and your Karma is the only thing that matters.... your actions decide your future...
When you will start believing and practicing Hinduism it will be too late it takes time to go into that state years of practice of kriya yoga but it also depends on the intensity of the practice and even if you aren't able to fulfill in this life time you can continue it in another life time....and one can't compare Hinduism with a religion because it's not it's a way of life that's why it's called sanatan dharm (eternal duty)
Please react to why genghis khan didn't invade India by abhijit chavda
you said at the end you want to "believe-in" you al ready started in a wrong foot. "sanatana dharma" widely known as Hinduism is an umbrella term for land of seekers....
in islam - if olla gave it to whom ever and it got corrupted but then again he should know the future , therefore we can say that time is greater than olla or whomever , how can you make the same mistake again and again .
20:14 Hi, I am not muslim myself but I think muslims also believe that Jesus (whom they call Isa) will come on some sort of Day of Judgement similar to the Christian belief. I guess this is a message that did not get corrupted.
Hinduism is philosophy centric, while abrahamic faith is history centeric . Problem is new data can negate historical claims.
Honduras in Mexico is Hanuman u can do u r research on that
When you reach chapter 10 in bhagwat Geeta you'll learn something that I guess draw towards Krishna drastically
Quran is not only preserved in its written form. it's memorised by millions of muslims around the globe from cover to cover, so if anyone changes or makes and mistake that will be immediately pointed out. Its also the only religious text and the only book to be memorised by millions. The Birmingham University also has the earliest manuscripts of quran that can be dated back to the time of prophet Muhammad pbuh.
Truth is not in the religion. One should strive to arrive at the truth. Sanatana Dharma is best suited as it lets people to choose their own path to truth.
Please be consistent now
doing controversy are we hehe!!
how..btw truth is always controversial
@Skyo.o o it was a joke, I didn't mean it lol. I meant this kind of video will get loads of views
how much?
Truth is never controversial it is always simple and straight. People weave lies around it to make it controversial because THEY CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!@@Skyo.o
You told in the end that you don't know what to believe in, I would say seek it why you want to believe something.
The Quran is God (Allah)'s word to Prophet Muhammad
Scribed into the Quran book by his Scribes
Later after Muhammad, the notes were compiled into the Quran
and the God's words were ilustrated and from the example of Prophet Muhammad's biography.
And this where very human kings and ppl .... started deciding on interpreting and penning the Word of the God, in ways they could make sense ... and made it gospel as Islam we know of today.
*I don't know if you should react to this kind of videos publicly, but if the video is well made then it's fine I think.. 🧡🧡
Please react to other videos of that channel. Many good videos are there
Here I have to say that the journey of salvation on earth is suffering you cannot enjoy it if you enjoy the journey then you will generate karma and won't get salvation it's clearly explained in Bhagwad Gita. This life is full of suffering and enjoyment but these are all temporary so our goal is to get out of this concept of enjoyment and suffering that is done with yoga. Yoga can lead to salvation it has nothing to do with enjoyment of the journey because enjoyment is done through senses. But Shri Krishna says one must live life with devotion and only enjoy God by transcendental senses and not the journey in this material world.
I should react on Swami mukundananda devotional lecture
Abrahmic and santana religions have very low to arguably no way of reconciliation with each other, both have fundamentally different approaches to everything!
Please react to Indian Archelogist Annica Mann in podcast with Ranveer Alhabadia you will get to know alot about Ancient India and Ancient Indian Spritituality.
19:54 The Doomsday Prophecy in the Abrahamic Texts is quite similar to the Avatāra of Kalki in Sanātana Dharma......
In the Revelation texts, The Second Coming of Christ is mentioned as Him coming on a White Horse to Judge.
In the Hadith texts of Islam, it is described that Al-Mahdi would come on a White Horse during Doomsday.
Interestingly, way before the Abrahamic Texts, the various Purāṇas of Sanātana Dharma talk about the Descent of Kalki Avatāra on a White Horse called Devdutt, around 427k years from now, when the Kali-Yuga ends. There's a lot more detail about this in the Purāṇas: The birth place of Kalki, His parents and their names, how He will train Himself in spiritual knowledge and ethical warfare, etc. The planetary positions are also mentioned in the Bhāgavata Mahā Purāṇa, indicating the time He would descend.
One should not compare abrahmic religion with indic religion.
Cause for comparing we should have atleast some common or anti things but we are totally different.
One can compare hindu baudh and jain , one can compare jews islam and christian.
But bro said he will do one Gita discussion when he comes back. 😢
I suggest you should watch videos of Sadhguru, shri shri ravi shankar, osho they are enlightened Indian guru which will be life changing experience for you
Proud pagan proud kafir after knowing Abrahamic ideologies
Wait until you will pick up Maha Geeta(Ashtavakra Geeta) which is given the title of greatest Geeta from rest of all geetas
Please react to Swami Saravriyananda, I'm requesting from long time 😊
To me the concept of 'original sin' is the most disgusting of them all.. It takes away power from ALL humanity. Its the ultimate form of tyranny