The Complete History of Bulgaria: Every Year
Вставка
- Опубліковано 19 лют 2022
- The most complete history of Bulgaria's evolving borders available on youtube
__________________________________________________________________
Thank you for watching this video. My channel produces mapping animations which tell the stories of countries and states through their changing borders.
__________________________________________________________________
My sources, music choices and personal comments on this video can be found in this document:
docs.google.com/document/d/1S... - Фільми й анімація
THIS, ladies and gentlemen, is the BEST mapping video of all TIMES.
The details are just sick. The Bulgar migrations, uprisings, guerrilla TERRITORIES, photo of Tsar Simeon as a baby, military operations in Iraq and Austria, THE COASTLINE OF DOBRUJA.
Puts Tigerstar and other historical mapping creators to shame.
DESERVES MILLIONS OF VIEWS!
that's why I wouldn't allow myself to do historical mapping, some mappers do it much better than me like hetman. I don't even dare to imagine the time and the number of images to make this video.
For real. I can't believe that it has only 25k views
Why did the coastline change?
Wow! Very well made! Greetings from Greece everyone 🇬🇷🤝🇧🇬
☦️🇧🇬❤️🇬🇷☦️
Ya panda ORTODOHSIA RE ADERFE.
This is THE BEST AND MOST ACCURATE VIDEO OF BULGARIAN HISTORY EVER. This MUST BE A MODEL FOR EVERY OTHER UA-camR. Great job.
its not really acurate.... it is detailed but not accurate...
This is the best video in Bulgarian history that has ever been made! I am extremely glad that you did not start the history from the founding of Old Great Bulgaria in 632, but you presented cartographically the earliest information about the Bulgarians and their country in the Caucasus. I was especially impressed by the fact that you included our wars from that time, which are some of the most glorious. All the other details are also just amazing! My biggest congratulations!
orjin bulgaria turkish people
@@berkcan9240
Nonsense,
Bulgarians never Turkic
Bulgars not Bulgarians
@@petertodorov1792 Bulgars were, not Bulgarians tho.
@@dr.maxwell7832 I'm a Bulgarian and I sure as hell do, we call them the same thing but we still consider them different culturally.
Fact is we are a lot more Thracian Slavs then the Bulgars.
Clan DULO is a Sarmatian/Bulgarian name
It is found in Greek inscriptions of the Bosphoran kingdom as DOULAS
It is recorded by Armenian Ashkhahatsuyts as the TUALI tribe
And the Sarmatian tribe--DULASI /DVALI
Contemporary Ossetian names - DOLA, DULA, DULY, DULLAE, DULITAE, DULAEVI, DULUEVI
Bulgarian names -DULE, DULIO, DULCHO, DULYA
Pashtun--------------DALA-----------Tribe
Sarmatian----------DUAL,DWAL,TUAL/TWAL----Tribe
Old Iranian--TWARA/DWALA--Family, Tribe , Group of People
Avestan------DARA-------------------Army, Group of People,
IndoAryan--TOLA--------------------Group of People
IndoEuropean Root-----------------TEU/DEU---Family, Tribe
Celtic---------------------------------------DEULU/ THEULU--Family, Tribe
A.V.Gadlo.Ethnic History of Northern Caucasus.Vol. IV-X. Leningrad. 1979., pgs. 117-118
E. Steblin-Kaminsky. Etymological Dictionary of Vahan Language. St. Petersburd. 1990., pgs. 222.
Digital South Asia Library. The Online Dictionary.
Focloir Bearla-Gaeilge (English-Irish Dictionary)
T.T. Kambolov. The History of the Ossetian Language 6.2 pgs. 417-418
Oh boy the Turks are gonna be mad once they found out about this info. 😂
May God protect Bulgaria🙏🇧🇬
No
@@OhYesmapping-a Yes
Gosh this is probably one of the best and most accurate mapping videos! I can sense you did a huge amount of research for this. Good job!
As a Bulgarian myself, I am absolutely shocked at how accurate this is! Also showing stuff which I never knew like: Bulgars starting in Modern day Circassia? Bulgars around Lake Van? "Black" Bulgari autonomy in the Khazars? Vidin lasting to 1420s and Lovech Fortress to 1446? Stara Zagora Uprising? A Pomak uprising and a Pomak Republic named Tamrash Bordering Eastern Rumelia and The Ottomans? Goryani Movement? WOW!
This is the best video for History of Bulgaria ever made. Greetings from Bulgaria! 🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬
Hunnic brothers 🇦🇿🇧🇬❤
Sizləri sevirik ❤
@@mehemmedqarayev1205 No and we are not Huns.
That was the best video about Bulgarian history in mapping history! You not only showed our version before Old Great Bulgaria, you also showed our uprising. Congratulations!
Wow, this is simply amazing! Thank you for all of your hard work 🇧🇬🙏
Man the amount of detail is just incredible well done!
Yes, it doesn't get any better than that. This is the best mapping video on the topic and it's not even close.
The most detail video about Bulgaria I have ever seen! BIG BRAVO! You have an amazing talent!
A special thank you to the creators below who helped on this project. Their work helped me a lot, please check them out!
Ebazel - ua-cam.com/channels/H-V-Lc6-8JdskMT8bc-SCA.html
Stefan Smith - ua-cam.com/channels/Gj60ClRXE0hwwAw0OcxcOg.html
Finally, released after six weeks of work.
Nice to See you Back, Hetman!!
Hetman are you in Ukraine ????
Congratulations for your video! As a Bulgarian, I find it very detailed and accurate. I would just add one detail - my home town of Stara Zagora was already a significant town during the First Bulgarian Empire and of great importance for the state, as it was the administrative center of the region of Zagora, the first region south of the Balkan mountains to be added to the territory of Bulgaria. Its name at that time period was Borui. With that being said, great job!
This video is extremely well made.Good job my laddie and all in six weeks as well.
This is magnificent! The detail and research is in depth! Great job.
This video is so high quality and detailed, you deserve a lot of views and subs, great work!!
This got me reading a little about the Bulgars in Italy and it was actually interesting. Great mapping video.
Well done!!! 👍historical events within this video was captured very well!
Fantastic video. I’m really impressed. This video is the best and most accurate in Bulgaria, it included much more than mine :)
@Ebazel
Hi
Hands down the best mapping video about the Bulgarian history! Absolutely gorgeous!
The amount of details is amazing. Great job!
One of the best mapping videos I've seen! Great work!
WE prove lthat macedonia is bulgarian,also the greatest mapping video ive ever seen
Used to be, but the people now don't identify with Bulgaria and it is their right aslong as they acknowledge their origins.
wow, such effort, thos needs a lot of attention!
This is just amazing . Very accurate video of history of Bulgaria ignore the hate comments this just deserves to have 1 billion views
great work!
great video! greetings from anatolia
My great-great grandpa fought in the Balkans wars and Ww1 - battle of tutrakan
Great job !
I subscribed for your cool chanbel!
It will be so interesting to make video about history of Odrysian kingdom with the blue colour from this video?
I love your videos! Can you find time to make video about history of Odrysian kingdom? Map history like this?
Thank You My Friend
Amazing, just simply amazing
Few people knows this details. Very great video. Sorry for my bad english 😀
This is not a video this is enciclopedy.amazing work men
Very detailed video. Certainly better than the Emperor Tigerstar's video about Bulgaria.
Great video. So much work put in it. It included the tribe of Anti(Eastern Slavic tribe) part of Proto-Bugarian union when settled at Danube. Procopius the chronologist of Belisarius and Justinian wrote in length about them. Anti was the first Slavic tribe to cross the Danube as invadors and finally settled with proto-Bulgarians.All different branches of Proto Bulgars Old state Turkic,Iranian and Slavic Almost all uprisings were covered. Kuber Proto-Bulgarians and those who settled in Italy. Including ''Ilinden -Preobravensko '' uprising with all regions of uprising covered from Krushewo on West Macedonia to Adrianople near Black sea. Ochrid-Debar (Bulgarian -Albanian) uprising against Serbian occupation in 1913. Jiiizzz people who know less become professors in history.You menaaged to squize so much info in a short clip. I am shocked in a good way. Liked and Subscribed. You are genius. That is the highest quality on the Internet.
This is the best video in the history of Bulgaria and one of the best videos in the history of a nation I've ever seen, congratulations it must have been a lot of work to do all this! I just don't understand why you put "Soviet Satellite" next to Bulgaria's name after 1946, since Bulgaria was an independent country, despite being aligned with the USSR, it was never part of it, it didn't need to have put this, but ok.
Soviet rule was brought against the will of the people by an imperialist Russian government, this is indicated by the Soviet declaration of war on Bulgaria (Bulgaria was previously neutral in the axis invasion of the Soviet Union).
Should 100% post a mapping tutorial, it’s enough to trace and what not, but how do you do the mountains and elevations? Is there any software you use to warp maps to a specific projection, or do you just move it around as seen fit, or make educated guesses?
Great video
Good video!
This is ACTUALLY the most complete history, you did it
Cool video! Not many people know about black bulgars!
Can you make video about map history of Odrysian kingdom?
Just beautiful
@Ebazel 1984
@Ebazel ok
Great work, brat! You mapped our history in such great detail, why did you leave out our inclusion in the EU (a supranational entity) post 2007?
Can you make video about map history of Odrysian kingdom? I like your videos! !
It was going to be extremely hard if you had to add the Khazan Khanate history and Black Bulgarian history on thr caucasus (Balkars) but its still the most detailed and well done video ever !
By 1400, the Danubian Bulgarians and Volga Bulgarians are too different in culture for the two be in the same video. It is a history of Bulgaria, not of the Bulgars. I plan on covering the history of the Volga Bulgars in more detail in a video on the Idel-Ural's history.
@@arsha1434 yes i totally get it. I would love to see the The Urals History Video 👍🏻
@@arsha1434 Bulgars and Bulgarians are different peoples with completely unrelated languages
@@papazataklaattiranimam
Hanim
There is only Bulgarians
@@papazataklaattiranimamI have seen you a lot on the comment sections of these historical videos and maybe some religious ones too.
Nikov is the first Bulgarian historian to pay special attention to, and attri bute great significance to, the Turkic components in the Bulgarian ethnogen esis (i.e., after the Bulgars) and among the ruling aristocracy. He elaborated on the issue of the "Turkic element's" influence upon Bulgarian history in a 1928 unpublished manuscript (delivered as a public lecture). Nikov began with the following policy-setting statement:
There is no period in our history on which the Turkic element did not exert its strongest influence and did not leave the deepest traces in the development of our people. [...] None of the Balkan peoples has experi enced the Turkic influence so strongly as our people,
The Turkic pressure began from Central Asia and had two directions to the northwest through southern Russia, and to the southwest through Persia and Asia Minor. The Bulgarian state was founded due to one of the Turkic peoples, the Bulgars, who themselves joined a number of Turkic tribal alliances (of Huns, Kutrigurs, Utigurs, Avars, and Khazars). During Byzantine rule, the Turkic Pechenegs and Uz came from the north; many of them crossed the Danube and were assimilated by the Bulgarian people. Then came the Cumans, without whose decisive help the uprising of Asenevtsi would hardly have succeeded. Thus, just as the First Bulgarian Kingdom was founded with the help of the Turkic Bulgars, the Second Kingdom was founded with "the decisive collabora tion of the Turkic Cumans."129 Not only did Cumans settle south of the Danube and become assimilated and absorbed by the Slavic-Bulgarian people, but they were also of great significance politically in the Second Kingdom, whose dynas ties all had Cuman blood in them. There were also many Bulgarian boyars of Cuman origin, including Balic in Dobrudzha. It could even be said that the Cumans acquired a dominant position in the political life of the state. 130 There followed the influence of the Mongol Tartars, who even supplied one Bulgarian king, Chaka. But of greatest importance were the Ottoman and Seljuk Turks, who conquered the Balkans from Asia Minor. Concerning the Cumans, Nikov considers the "transfusion of blood" from Turkic "elements" an asset, a means of rejuvenating and strengthening the "race" and enhancing the vitality of the Bulgarian people (in contrast with the conquering Turks).
LOL🤣
Hanim
No Bulgarian Believes in the FAKE turkic theory
In 20 years the turkic theory will be taught only in Turkish universities along with denial of the Armenian Genocide
THE BULGARS were not Turkic, but Iranic. There are TONS of evidence suggesting this. Mainly burial practices (very similar to those of the Alans and Sarmatians), Genetic and linguistic evidence - groznijat.tripod.com/b_lang/bl_oldwords.html
You can CLEARLY SEE, that most Bulgar words were from Pamirian (Iranic) origin.
@@petertodorov1792 "Denial of the Armenian genocide" WHAT 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@Orthosaur7532 unreliable cherrypicking source, nice try though
Brother
Only turkish universities deny the Armenian Genocide
During the early Middle Ages, pre-Christian Bulgaria (680-864/5) was one of the most important powers of Southeastern Europe. Historians have commonly explained its survival and success in terms of a par- ticular ethnic symbiosis between Slavic commoners and Bulgar elites of Turkic origin, who ultimately gave their name to the Slavic-speaking Bulgarians. Bulgar khans, archons, or kings' ruled over territories that are now within Bulgaria and Romania. In Romanian historiography, which has traditionally viewed Romanians as a Romance-language island in a Slavic and Hungarian sea, the Bulgars play no serious role in national history. Archaeological assemblages that can be dated between the late seventh and the late ninth century are consistently attributed to "proto-Romanians." By contrast, the Bulgars are the quintessential part of Bulgarian national identity, a marker of distinction from all other histories of Slavic-speaking nations. As a consequence, studying the Bulgar (or, as it is commonly known in Bulgaria, "proto-Bulgarian") archaeology was an essential component of Bulgarian nationalism, especially in the interwar decades, as well as recently. It is only in the years after the Soviet occupation of 1944 that the emphasis in Bulgarian archaeology was forcefully shifted to the study of the Slavs."
Hanim
Did Turkic people originate in the Caucasus as you claim
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The Turkic nation of the Bulgars - indigenous to the Caucasus, was also known to Movses Khorenatsi:
A post from you is a blessing, praise!
@@arsha1434 Thanks. It's also great that your videos are detailed and accurate.
Are they not Romanian lands then? Is your point that they are Bulgar?
Pre-Christian Bulgaria was considered powerful yes. But Bulgaria only reached its zenith when it became christian. Not to mention the only reason the Bulgarian identity survived is because of christianity.
I like how you show how decentralized the first bulgarian empire was
Nowdays Bulgaric Countries: Bulgaria , North Macedonia , Chuvashia , The Population Of "Tatarstan" , Balkaria , Karachai-Cercessia , Gagauzia.
There are probably more countries related to the bulgaric people but their origin is not bulgaric they are just influenced by our blood or we are brother nations like Hungary , Croatia Some viliges in Italy and Our Neighbors who stole lands whit majority of bulgaric people.
OGHUR TURKİC BULGARS 😍😍😍
@@gokhan2970 They ware mostly Scytho-Sarmatian but probably got tribes in west influenced whit Turkic stuff
Turkic Bulgars and Bulgarians are not the same thing at all, we only really got our name from the Turkic people's.
@@user-gy1jf5xt6x they were mostly turkic but with iranic elements
@@rawka_7929 i know.
ASPARUKH IS AN IRANIAN NAME
Asparukh
Gender Male
Origin
Word/name Iranian
Meaning
Possessor of Shining Horses (aspa + rauk)
Horse-souled (aspa + rah)
Asparukh is a Middle Iranian male name,[1] attested in ancient Georgia and early medieval Bulgaria. It is a compound with the two elements: "aspa" (horse) and "rauk" (shine), meaning "he who has shining horses".[2] Some other researchers claim that the name is derived from "aspa" (horse)
According to Prof. Raymond Detrez, who is a specialist in Bulgarian history and language, such views are based on anti-Turkish sentiments and in serious scholarly circles it is well known that the Bulgar language was a Turkic one: Developing cultural identity in the Balkans: convergence vs divergence, Raymond Detrez, Pieter Plas, Peter Lang, 2005, p. 29
However the linguistic impact of the Iranian world on the Turkic Bulgars is indisputable. For instance the name of the founder of Danubian Bulgaria was Asparukh, which is old Iranian in origin: "The Huns, Rome and the Birth of Europe", Hyun Jin Kim, Cambridge University Press, 2013,, p. 68.
@@papazataklaattiranimam
Hanim,
Your moving to Germany is anti Turkish
You can't stand living with your own people😂😂
@@papazataklaattiranimam
Hanim
You are a beautiful dancer
So this is why you moved to Germany
ua-cam.com/video/SWi1G_JNaCI/v-deo.html
@@papazataklaattiranimam
Hanim
Your Moving to Germany shows you are anti Turkish
You can't stand living with your own people
PAPAZA TAKLA ATTIRAN IMAM
ua-cam.com/video/axUixg0RFaI/v-deo.html&ab_channel=Zennediva
I would like a collab like this too with the full history of morroco (including all dynasties)
With regard to topology, the obtained tree divides the modern Turkic languages into six principal sub-branches (in the order of their divergence): Bulgharic, North Siberian, South Siberian, Khalaj-Salar, Oghuz, and Kipchak-Karluk (‘Macro-Kipchak’). The time-depth of the Turkic family on the maximum credibility tree is estimated to be around 2,066 years BP (median height of the node), with a 95% highest posterior density between 1,517 and 2,755 years BP. The topology and the age of the obtained tree are discussed in further detail in Section 6.
The early split between the Bulgharic branch and the Common Turkic languages shapes the Turkic language family as a clear-cut binary structure. This agrees with most of the previous classifications of the Turkic language family, whether they are based on the historical-comparative or lexicostatistic approaches (Tekin 1990: 16; Menges 1995: 60-1; Johanson 1998: 81-3; Dybo 2006: 766-817, 2013: 18; Mudrak 2009: 172-79).
Alexander Savelyev, Martine Robbeets, Bayesian phylolinguistics infers the internal structure and the time-depth of the Turkic language family, Journal of Language Evolution, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2020, Pages 39-53
Hanim
Bulgarians never turkic
1. Give PRIMARY SOURCES that show tengrinism in Bulgaria
2. Give PRIMARY SOURCES that show the name Bulgarian comes from bulgamak
@@petertodorov1792Yes bulgarians isnt Turkic.But BULGARS Is Turkic
@@petertodorov1792bulgarlar tanrıya ( tengri ) tangra derdi
@@mehemmedqarayev1205
No tengri, tangra or tarzan in Bulgaria
Today Volga Bulgaria is Tatarstan and Chuvash republic
Greetings from your Hungarian friends 🇭🇺❤️🇧🇬
And Hunic cousin ! ❤Hungary 🇭🇺 and brave Hungarian people ❤
Hetman
The title Kanasubigi dates only from Krums time
Krum got it from the Avars when he took over eastern Avaria
Before this Bulgarians used the title Bat
@Ebazel
Brother,
Read the works of our scholar Dr. Zhivko Voynikov online
Kubrats first son was Bat Bayan
And there was a Chionite King from the 3rd century AD whose name was Grum Bat
Grum Bat is the same name as our great Krum
Bat is an Iranian title and means Lord
But Krum was a Pannonian Bulgarian , so he knew the Avar nobility very well and after he conquered them ,
He took their title Kanasubigi.
It shows that the Bulgarians were an Iranian people not Turkic
The Avars were a Tungus/Manchurian/protoMongolian people NOT Turkic
@@petertodorov1792 Actually on Krum lead seal the title is "Arkon Ubigi" A mix of Bulgarian and Greek. Arkon (Arhont) mean souveren ruler in Greek. Bulgarian title "Kanas Ubigi" was translated in Greek as "O ek Theo Arkon" (King from God) Before 10th century Greek was official writing language of First Bulgarian Empire. Kanas Ubigi do sound a lot like the Avar title Kanizauchi mentioned in French sources.
@@Bayganu
Brother,
You are right , Krum was a Pannonian Bulgarian and so had intimate knowledge of the Avar aristocracy
When he conquered east Avaria , he brought the Avar aristocracy with him to Bulgaria
Krum took up this title to say he was the succesor to the Avars
The title Kanasuvigi means in Avar "Ruler under God" just like "O ek Theo Arkon"
The Avars were a Tungus/Manchurian people NOT Turkic
All this is explained by Dr. Voynikov online in Bulgarian "The Avar Origin of the Title Kanasuvigi"
@@petertodorov1792 voynikov is 100% not part of RELIABLE ACADEMIC SOURCE category you blockhead😂
@@petertodorov1792 The exact origin of his name is not fully known. Hyun Jin Kim etymologized his name as *Qurum-pat, "ruling prince";[1][2] containing Iranian element pat "chieftain, ruler"[3] and Turkic qurum "rule, leadership, administration"[3][4][5] which is attested in the name of Bulgarian khan Krum.[2][5]
What are those Bulgar migrations at the beginning of the video? Could sb pls give me the sources? Anyways this is the best mapping video I've seen incredible job!
This is the most accurate history mapping of Bulgaria so far. Now many of our bulgarian brothers must realize that Bulgarians are not white with blue eyes.
The South Slavic tribal groups moved south and southwest from their Pripet homeland, eventually entering the Byzantine-controlled Balkan Peninsula as either allies of or refugees from the invading Turkic Avars during the second half of the sixth century. Their search for a new, permanent homeland proved successful. Today their descendants solidly inhabit virtually all of the northwestern, central, and southeastern regions of the Balkans.
Turks comprise a third ethnic component of the Balkan population. Although today numerically small-a little over 1 million people (about 2 percent of the total population) they have played a role in shaping the history of the Balkans far beyond their numbers.
In late antiquity the rolling plains of the Danube and Prut rivers in the Balkans' northeast served Turkic tribes from the Eurasian steppes as an open door into the heart of the peninsula and the riches of the Eastern Roman Empire. Huns and related tribes swept through the Balkans in the fifth and sixth centuries, followed by the Avars and their allies in the sixth and seventh. Among these latter were the Bulgars, who established a state south of the Danube. Unlike the Avars, whose settlements in the Balkans proved transitory, the Bulgar state persisted in the face of concerted Byzantine pressures. By the ninth century the Bulgars were challenging the Byzantine Empire for political hegemony in the Balkans, but by that time they also were well on the way toward ethnic assimilation into their Slavic-speaking subject population. The conversion of the Turkic Bulgar ruling elite to Orthodox Chris-tianity at midcentury opened the gate to their rapid and total Slavic assimilation. Within a hundred years of the Bulgar conversion, most traces of their Turkic origins had disappeared, except for their name-the Bulgars had been transformed into Slavic Bulgarians
Oğuz, Pecheneg, and Cuman Turkic tribes appeared in the Balkans between the ninth and eleventh centuries. Most of them eventually suffered an ethnic fate similar to the Bulgars and left little lasting impression, although the Gagauz Turks of Bessarabia, a region lying east of the Prut River (now known as Moldova), and some Turks living today in the eastern Balkans may be direct ethnic descendants of those medieval Turkic interlopers. Additionally, the Ottoman Turks' five-century rule over most of the Balkans established numerous scattered enclaves of Turkish- speaking groups throughout much of the southern portion of the peninsula, with a heavy concentration in the southeastern region of ancient Thrace.
Avars were TUNGUS/MANCHURIAN people NOT turkic
@@petertodorov1792 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@papazataklaattiranimam
Hanim
KANASUBIGI is a TUNGUS/MANCHURIAN word NOT turkic
@@petertodorov1792 The Buyla inscription which is the only attested epigraph in the native language of the Pannonian Avars was identified as Oghuric thereby making their Turkic origin a reality in the academic world.
Furthermore evidence is provided by a Khazar ruler who lists Pannonian Avars among exclusively Turkic tribes. Letter of Khazar Khagan Joseph ben Aaron :
"You ask us also in your epistle: "Of what people, of what family, and of what tribe are you?" Know that we are descended from Japhet, through his son Togarmah. I have found in the genealogical books of my ancestors that Togarmah had ten sons."
Agyor (Orkhon Uyghurs)
Tiros (Göktürks)
Ouvar (Avars)
Ugin / Uguz (Oghuz Turks)
Bisal (Pechenegs)
Tarna (Tarniach)
Khazar (Khazars)
Zanor (Janur)
Balnod (Bulgars)
Savir (Sabirs)
Hanim
KANASUBIGI is neither a turkic word or a turkic concept🤣🤣
I love the music
Can you make video about map history of Odrysian kingdom? With the same colour?
🇷🇴❤🇧🇬
What is your source for Stanko Kusan and the Lovech bandits? I’m aware that Lovech survived until 1446, but I can’t find any info about that particular Boyar leading any resistance past that date
lovechtoday.eu/за-последната-българска-крепост-падн/, last few paragraphs.
Има малко повече информация за това събитие, както за самия Станко Кусам и предполагаемото му потекло в "Домът на Шишман" на Петър Зиков.
There is the book "The House of Shishman" by Peter Zikov - a historical analysis of the last ruling medieval Bulgarian dynasty Shishman and their descendants, which Stanko Kusam is presumably related to based on circumstantial evidence and also talks about this event. It came out fairly recently and only available in Bulgarian unfortunately.
Edit: I had the exact name of the book wrong.
@@BanJanuka
Thank you so much
There are some mistakes but overall , great video , approved on behalf of the BA
Can you make video about map history of Odrysian kingdom?
The great Persian scientist Abu Zayd al-Balkhi 850-934 AD
Says that Bulgarians worshipped the god
EDFU and his idol FA
In the same text he says the Turks worshipped BIr Tengri
He clearly distinguishes between Bulgarians and Turks
M . Tahir, Le livre de la creation de el-Balhi, Paris , 1899 ,v. IV, 56
Look panturks no tengri in Bulgaria
Epic
Some cardinals are mentioned in the Danube Bulghar List of Princes, i.e. wać 'three, tot 'four, alti 'six', citi seven', wutur 'thirty'. Ordinals are formed by (+(D)m), e.g. wäćim 'third', tot-im 'fourth, alti-m 'sixth', citi-m 'seventh', segt-im 'eighth, wtir-im 'thirtieth'; cf. East Old Turkic (+()ně) in uč-inč, tort-inċ, alti-nč, yeti-nč, and Volga Bulghar väčim 'third', tüwätim 'fourth', altis 'sixth', čiyetis 'seventh'.
Johanson, L. and Csató, É.Á. (2022) The Turkic languages. London: Routledge.
Hanim
Were Pre Manzikert Anatolians Turkic because they speak Turkish now?
The Bulgars were Iranic. They spoke an Iranic language, since most words are very similar to the Pamirian (Iranic) ones.
groznijat.tripod.com/b_lang/bl_oldwords.html
@@Orthosaur7532 nice cherrypicking source though😂
@@papazataklaattiranimam Not like your constant copy-and-paste from Wikipedia 🤣🤣🤣
@@Orthosaur7532 this joke Bulgarian site is worse than Wikipedia😂
Great detail, didn't look if there are mistakes that much, some things aren't clear to me to say if they are correct.
you make tigerstar and ollie bye look like novices by comparison, how do you not have 1 million subscribers?!
What tool do you use for this?
Paint.net and Davinci Resolve
North Macedonia always was Bulgaria
We are thracian
never was, isn't and never will be
@@andrejsekulovski7801 Iam macedonian tho and yes we sre bulgarians by Kuber and by bitola writing and Ohrid was capital of Bulgaria
Indeed.
@@andrejsekulovski7801bulgarian
@@BringBackCyrillicBGindeed
How do you make these type of videos
What is the first song called i think its Chuvashian Folklore song im i right ?
Yes, ua-cam.com/video/r6aTqcJC2TY/v-deo.html the first song in this compilation.
@@arsha1434 çuvaşia rapuplic of turkish bulgaria turkish orjin dna test genetic turkis orjin bularia rapuplik of turkish
Also is pogKPP still working on his version of this?
I don't know, I didnt see any announcements from him
@@arsha1434
Hmm ... I’d recommend you send your video to him.. it may help :)
@@stefansmith4372 he's working on Hungary
@@tahsin6743 he finished it
Bulgaria on 3 seas huh?
Is there a problem with that ?
*Great video!*
But the Bulgarians have 80 uprisings against ottomans!
Such as?
What abour kazan, astrakhan its too was bulgaria
What if you did the weltreich Bulgaria lore with this video?
Ok , in order to clearify situation :
Clan Dulo is Hunnic. Huns are turkic-siberian people came from Siberia.
But when they reached middle asia and crossed Ural mountains, huns completely mixed with Iranian people who were settled from Ukraine to Siberia. That's how appeared white huns / Hephthalites.
On the territory of Great Bulgaria Hephthalites of Dulo mixed with Sarmatians. After Attila united with many germanic tribes and attacked Roman Empire. Thereby, in Attila's army appeared doubles names : Hunnic-Iranian and Germanic. For example, Crimean Goths who were neighbor of Proto Bulgarians had lived till 16 century in Crimean peninsula.
And finally, Great Bulgaria was small empire where were residing many nations: turkic, huns, germanic, proto Bulgarians, slavs and even greeks and Baltic people
Clan DULO is a Sarmatian/Bulgarian name
It is found in Greek inscriptions of the Bosphoran kingdom as DOULAS
It is recorded by Armenian Ashkhahatsuyts as the TUALI tribe
And the Sarmatian tribe--DULASI /DVALI
Contemporary Ossetian names - DOLA, DULA, DULY, DULLAE, DULITAE, DULAEVI, DULUEVI
Bulgarian names -DULE, DULIO, DULCHO, DULYA
Pashtun--------------DALA-----------Tribe
Sarmatian----------DUAL,DWAL,TUAL/TWAL----Tribe
Old Iranian--TWARA/DWALA--Family, Tribe , Group of People
Avestan------DARA-------------------Army, Group of People,
IndoAryan--TOLA--------------------Group of People
IndoEuropean Root-----------------TEU/DEU---Family, Tribe
Celtic---------------------------------------DEULU/ THEULU--Family, Tribe
A.V.Gadlo.Ethnic History of Northern Caucasus.Vol. IV-X. Leningrad. 1979., pgs. 117-118
E. Steblin-Kaminsky. Etymological Dictionary of Vahan Language. St. Petersburd. 1990., pgs. 222.
Digital South Asia Library. The Online Dictionary.
Focloir Bearla-Gaeilge (English-Irish Dictionary)
T.T. Kambolov. The History of the Ossetian Language 6.2 pgs. 417-418
@@petertodorov1792 Dulo was hunnic clan. Huns themselves weren't Sarmatians. But they dissolved in iranian people
@@nname3754
DULO is a pure Sarmatian name
You have your sources
Look them up for yourself
@@petertodorov1792Hun Attila was from clan Dulo. Were Huns Sarmatians ?
@@nname3754
Show the PRIMARY SOURCE then ?
I'm here for the comments😂
Typical bulgarian nationalists
Almost there.
Hey can you post the sources?
DM me on discord, Hetman#9122
@@arsha1434
Brother,
Bulgarians and Huns are different people
Armenian sources place Bulgarians from at least the 1st Century AD in Vanand --the present Kars area
And the Kuban area as you show
All this is in Movses Khorenatsi and Ananias Shirakatsi
Please read Dr. Zhivko Voynikov's article "Who are the Ancient Bulgarians or ProtoBulgarians "
And Petar Goliyski PhD " In the Slopes of Elbrus "
@@petertodorov1792that’s a completely unreliable source which is product of Pseudo-historical Bulgarian academy
@@papazataklaattiranimam
LOL🤣🤣
Hanim
Why is the source unrealiable
Is it because it completely contradicts your pan turk fantasy world view😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Can anyone tell me about the vlechov conspiracy?
unironically based
“Cyril the general retired into the city named Odyssus, and stayed there while Vitalian withdrew into the province of Bulgaria.” - (Chr., LXXXIX, 75)
The author of the clip has no idea what he is doing and planting false information. Province of Bulgaria, at the time of Vitalian, what does it mean? How long does it take to establish a name for a certain territory?
6:57 when a baby tsar simeon II joins WW2
and it became prime minister in 7:17
Hi
Varna crusCade?
Тия детайли малко хора ги знаят българин ли си? 🙂
We are not turks😃
It's bolyar with A L in Bulgarian not Boyar
Питам се дали автохтонния народ на Балканите, покорен от Римската империя, част от него е бягал към източния бряг на Черно море е образувал държава около 400 година в близост до Крим е решил да събере сили, за да се върне пак на Балканите под формата на държавност да нападне остатъка от покорените не избягали българи под римско робство.
Bulgaria, which was under the auspices of the Ottoman Empire for more than 400 years 😅
so basically early bulgarians were turkic and they are nowadays slavic? So they are not related to their ancestors
The Bulgars were the slave owners of the slavs the same way that the ottomans would later control Bulgaria and the balkans it's honestly surprising that the Bulgarians didn't adopt the ottoman national identity
BULGARİA 🦁 🇧🇬 ❤ 🇦🇿 🐺 AZERBAİJAN
No, we are with Armenia 🇧🇬❤️🇦🇲
its not really accurate.... it is detailed but not accurate...
?
@The Hetman Mapping the misconception about Bulgaria losing territories from the Hungary during Simeon The Great is false. Hungary was never been to the Carpatian Mountains during his reign - maybe in 970 when Tsar Petar died but no earlier. Where in internet says that Bulgaria reached Transilvania - it doesnt mean that they were at the bottom of it, their territory was almost above Transilvania, not at the southest part of it. Also Bulgars were never parth of the Turkic Khagan, they werent Gokturks at all, they are dessending from Iran/iraq , south of the Turks. Turky has made the assumptions that because Bulgaria was under its yoke for 5 centuries that means they are them, no, and also Turks and Turkey have almost nothing in common. Also Boris 1 never lost control over philippopolis during his reign or path to the Adriatic sea. Tsar Simeon had core territories up to Peloponesse border. There are a lot of mistakes about this mapping over the first, second and third Bulgarian empire even tho its detailed.
@@arsha1434 but the 3rd Bulgarian empire you got right 95%, i only dissagree with minor details.
This is not what my research found, which showed Simeon's neglect of the territories beyond the Danube during his wars against Constantinople to be significant. That being said, I do not see the problem, as I show Transylvania under Bulgarian control until the large defeat in the W.l.d.n.r battle. The Gokturks may or may not have held influence that far West, my sources were not clear on this. I have not claimed in the video modern Bulgaria and Turkey are similar ethnically. Plovdiv was certainly lost under Boris-Mikhail's reign until 964 when it was returned as part of a peace deal with Constantinople. However, my sources were not clear on the extent of these losses, with the loss of the Adriatic coast being a generous interpretation for the Byzantines. I am certain these mistakes are not so but rather different sources speaking different information
I know the sources are different, i am Bulgarian myself and i know that what they have toughted me at school is way different than what they have been in other countries on the Balkan Peninsula, but the Bulgarian ones are the most accurately represented (when we were vassals of the Mongols and fought back with Ivailo, ect). But a matter of fact is that Bulgaria was there way before anybody, we never stole history nor made something to look way above our standarts. I know you probably wouldnt care much about it, but the sources of a more distanced countries (UK, US, Western Europe) are neglecting and underestimating what was achieved by mediavel Bulgaria.
lets start with Simeon, the only thing he did wrong is that he spended all the money from the national treasury into war deffenses (up north) and major offenses (at the Roman Empire), which left the next rulers to suffer. He held the Carpatian mountains up until tsar Petar, Serbia was getting little more territories up west but Hungary (Moravia) never really extended that further into those romanian mountains, they werent that big of the time around Simeon. Plovdiv is laying on the river Maritsa, which was way higher territory to be held by the Roman Empire. Tsar Roman and Samuil managed to reconquer much of Wallaicha and Dobrudja, but this reign was cut short because when Samuel saw 15k of his soldiers blinded he got a heart attack. Tsar Ivan Asen 2 helf a LARGE amount of territory and the only vassals were on the greek territory up south.
I recommend you to check this channel, it is pretty accurate - Bulgarian Empire Mapping