Until President signs a bill into law, the courts have no business intervening - Bagbin

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 лип 2024
  • Parliamentary business: Until President signs a bill into law, the courts have no business intervening. - Bagbin
    #upfront
    #MyJoyOnline
    #JoyNews
    www.myjoyonline.com/ghana-news/
    Subscribe for more videos just like this:
    / @myjoyonline
    Follow us on:
    Facebook: / joy997fm
    Twitter: / joy997fm
    Instagram: bit.ly/3J2l57
    Click on this for more news:
    www.myjoyonline.com/

КОМЕНТАРІ • 24

  • @rawlingsjay1
    @rawlingsjay1 27 днів тому +5

    I agree with him.

  • @ishmaeldjkomfa7847
    @ishmaeldjkomfa7847 27 днів тому +9

    Courts talk or interpret Law , they don’t talk or interpret Bill , Same way Parliament dont talk Law , they discuss Bill
    Seperation of powers must be respected

  • @nelisco9797
    @nelisco9797 27 днів тому +5

    Overuse of the courts

  • @ebenezergarbrah5255
    @ebenezergarbrah5255 27 днів тому +5

    So long as the legislative processes do not go against the constitution and standing orders of the parliament. No one can interfere with the work of parliament. Remember that the constitution is the supreme law of the land.

    • @akuamoahboateng9603
      @akuamoahboateng9603 26 днів тому

      You are 100% correct. The House is loosing it power to the court.

  • @hetty7891
    @hetty7891 27 днів тому +8

    I hope they will listen to him.

  • @abrahamklutsey8094
    @abrahamklutsey8094 27 днів тому +1

    I said this long time ago. Now the courts want to be part of parliamentary processes.

  • @Haus-of-Gh-Kennels
    @Haus-of-Gh-Kennels 27 днів тому

    Speaker is right buy I watched some of the proceedings today and realised that the issue is against the speaker as a person and not parliament as an institution so the supreme court can determine such a matter.

    • @bosby8742
      @bosby8742 25 днів тому

      Please we are talking Law not emotions Go to Article 93(2) Article 125(3) am given uou another Article 2(1) and Article 130(1) Article 106 hives the procedure of making Bills in Ghana They did and in the case of Ezuame Manaan v AG The Supreme Court struck portion down the had to in Psrliament review the Bill and it was noticed Parliament erred such that they font have power of making any law if the bill goes through it must as 108 satisfy the condition laid out in the Constitution.
      Again. His assertion that Nobody...Read Article 3..Art 4,Art 55 Parliament is injunction from making laws making Ghana a one party state.There is another concept the Doctrine of Necessity and The Doctrine of ripeness ....so let's see how it's played out on 17th July

  • @defiatfm3159
    @defiatfm3159 27 днів тому +6

    Hmm, this Akuffo Addo government is always playing with our minds

  • @kwamek9
    @kwamek9 27 днів тому +2

    When idiots rule, everything mess up

  • @Nana-z5h
    @Nana-z5h 27 днів тому +4

    Is this guy joking? He must be living in an alternative Ghana 😂😂😂

    • @frederickasamoah1308
      @frederickasamoah1308 27 днів тому +7

      He's making the corrections that everyone is carelessly ignoring

    • @sethjoseph4382
      @sethjoseph4382 27 днів тому

      That is position of the constitution, but when you elect a tyrant they have no respect for constitution.

    • @niijekay4435
      @niijekay4435 27 днів тому +1

      What do you mean by joking. Do you know more thank him?

    • @Mohammedadjei-ln9pw
      @Mohammedadjei-ln9pw 27 днів тому +2

      Your mind is dead

    • @servant1tv765
      @servant1tv765 27 днів тому +1

      Just like how Nana/Bawumia have lost touch of reality. Nkwaseasɛm

  • @issakayusif4152
    @issakayusif4152 27 днів тому

    Prejudicial...!!!

    • @niijekay4435
      @niijekay4435 27 днів тому

      How is this pre judicial when the law governing your work is very clear.