Interesting conversation. Thanks! The more I see how dependent LLM's performance seems to be from been trained on ALL the data vs SOME of the data, the more they look to me as the ultimate socializers of COLECTIVE knowledge. One question that comes to mind is: To what extent the wealth created by LLM's should go to the creators of the technology vs to everyone? The dynamics mentioned where the biggest models beat all the rest is a winner takes all on steroids. I hope that in the same way that, as the skills of those tools keep expanding, "less skilled" people risk becoming irrelevant, a similar process happens with those at the top. Who knows? Maybe AI (used in a fair way) will finally end history in the sense that no human will be in a position of exploiting others ...
Peter was a great interviewer, great questions and prep work
Very informative conversation and much appreciated Ethan and Peter, thank you for sharing your time and work, peace
Thanks for tuning in! We're glad you found Ethan's interview as insightful as we did!
Interesting conversation. Thanks! The more I see how dependent LLM's performance seems to be from been trained on ALL the data vs SOME of the data, the more they look to me as the ultimate socializers of COLECTIVE knowledge. One question that comes to mind is: To what extent the wealth created by LLM's should go to the creators of the technology vs to everyone? The dynamics mentioned where the biggest models beat all the rest is a winner takes all on steroids.
I hope that in the same way that, as the skills of those tools keep expanding, "less skilled" people risk becoming irrelevant, a similar process happens with those at the top.
Who knows? Maybe AI (used in a fair way) will finally end history in the sense that no human will be in a position of exploiting others ...