The unemployed son who moved back in with his parents should’ve left well enough alone. How dare he tell homeowners that lived in the neighborhood for over 20 years where to park. Why didn’t HE park somewhere else? He literally showed as evidence that the plaintiff could’ve parked somewhere so why didn’t he park there??
@@jasondorsett6019unfortunately you can’t control how someone will respond. You also can’t do things because you old and think people will let it ride. With that being said, the plaintiff knew she pushed that old lady down and that’s why she gotta pay her. Heck, she probably been wanting to lay hands on both of them 🤷🏽♀️
@@jmelo9993 The video evidence does not lie. The black lady did exactly that. She got in the white lady's face and gave her a push. She did it with intent to knock her over. That nasty behavior. NASTY!
The plaintiff clearly shoved the woman. For her to say, "l guess she thought about it and made herself fall to the ground." She obviously tried to imply the defendant purposely threw herself to the ground. That definitely wasn't the case. There was no pause before the defendant fell.
The plantiff wasn't being a bully. She reacted to the slap on the hand by the defendant. Although the plaintiff shove the co-defendant both women were wrong! The co-defendant receive a reactionary response to the unwarranted slap on the hand. The co-defandant shouldn't have never touched the plaintiff or confronted the plaintiff at all!
That defendant missed a serious head injury by just a few centimetres. The difference between a slap by an elderly and a shove by a much younger person is worlds apart. It is very evident that that shove was not a reflex action but pure aggression.
Let's be real, plaintiff knew she was in trouble once JJ said she wanted to see the tape. 😂 That's why she hastened to add that it wasn't shown in court, like if that would have swayed Judy's wanting to see it.
I'm not saying the plaintiff should push the old lady but if you watch the video carefully the old lady did slap Ms Marshall on her hand before she was push.. Watch the video carefully
I was with the plaintiffs until I saw the video... She is a straight up liar and should have been convicted of assault. And because that lady is a disabled elderly, it makes it worse! Both groups are rotten though.
Victims? Yes. In the sense that they are a product of their upbringing, environment, and educational background. Of course, as adults, they have agency over whether they behave civilly or not, I'm simply saying the deck tilted, but not in their direction.
@@ericrivera8410 She never, the Black woman walked up to her!!!! Then the Black woman clearly in the video pushed her face and body into the disabled woman staggering her back to which the disabled woman then maybe slapped her hand to which the Black woman shoved the disabled woman to the ground. How is it possible we both watch the exact same video yet you don't have the eye sight or comprehension to grasp what your own eyes saw... Mind boggling.
funny how you said the word disabled 5011 times but the disabled started the altercation by NOT going in the house, but instead, going back to her car, and then approaching a woman she is 'afraid of' to start arguing with. This is prime example of "F*** Around & Find Out." Once you make a move, the other reaction doesn't have to be on the same level... yeah, she paid for that push, but I bet Betty won't walk up to her again, looking for a fight! @@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
The plantiff wasn't being a bully. She reacted to the slap on the hand by the defendant. Although the plaintiff shoved the co-defendant both women were wrong! The co-defendant received a reactionary response to the unwarranted slap on the hand. The co-defandant shouldn't have never touched the plaintiff or confronted the plaintiff at all!
I knew within the first 30 seconds of the case that the defendant's son was a huge instigator. No surprise to find out that his goofy azz was trying to play parking monitor.
The plaintiff said that the video wasn’t shown in her other case. She wanted to show it because it would show the defendant fell on purpose. Then she said the charges had been dropped. I bet if they had that video the charges would not have been dropped.
@@I.am.Mrs.Mathers The producers got their hands on the video. The plaintiff did not bring it. Did you see her face when JJ said, "I understand there's a surveillance video. I'd like to see it."
I have the same parking situation where I live. I do have a certain spot I like to park in because everyone parks where they live. It’s first come first serve. We are overcrowded in this area so whoever gets a parking spot first, gets it. So I can somewhat understand the situation in this case. However I don’t agree any violence. She should’ve not pushed that old lady. She’s more vulnerable and she could’ve died.
Plaintiff is petty . She admitted she never parked in front of the defendant’s home until her son moved in. She also straight up lied that she didn’t injure the defendant and she did . Thank God for the tape . Im not saying the defendants are angels they arnt but the plaintiff is a petty nasty woman and im glad Judy saw right through her . Im sorry the court didn’t find her guilty
Why even confront the elderly lady? You already parked. Go about your business. Do not engage. Then she wouldn't have, maybe, slapped your hand and even if she did, you assaulted her. You're lucky she wasn't injured even more severely. You were let off in that case. But JJ saw what really happened. Shame on you.
I viewed this once and was looking for it to show my son. The plaintiff’s behavior was absolutely inappropriate. The defendant gait is slow and not steady. There was rage and anger which led to this unfortunate incident! People choose not to get along, behaving similar to grade school students. I understand the defendant’s son wanting his mother to have the closest parking to her home. You have to buy private property in order to have the right to park in front of your house. The plaintiff and defendant need to buy private properties . They don’t know how to compromise.
Why couldn’t the son just park where he told the plaintiffs to park and be done with??? The defendant literally showed judge Judy that there were other spaces to park but HE chose to park in front of the plaintiff’s house knowing that they would park in front of his mother’s house. That’s why he stood there. If he wanted his elderly mother to have the parking spot in front of her house which I understand why didn’t he just park down the street and walk and not cause problems, where there weren’t any problems for 20 years???? This man is just an unemployed entitled jerk. That’s the problem with America. That’s why this country is going to hell. I’m not excusing the plaintiff’s behavior at all no elderly person should be assaulted in such a manner but HER son is the one causing ALL the problems.
According to the diagram, they both have driveways. Why can't they use them for parking instead of the street? Did I miss something? I feel my car is safer in my driveway rather than on the street.
Everyone is wrong because they are constantly pushing each other's buttons. In the incident in the video, the plaintiff makes it sound like the defendant comes up to the plaintiff and she was defensive only. The defendant may have initiated it (may because you can not see plaintiff behind the car and could have talked first) but the plaintiff is the one who closes the distance and gets right in the defendant's face. And she did not last see her standing, she saw the fall.
Just be a kind neighbor and leave the old lady have her spot. I realize street parking is public parking and you have a right, But…. try to be a Kinder person. One day you will older! AND never push an elder like that! JJ was your karma for that deed.
The defendants aren't even parking in front of the plaintiffs home. The plaintiffs aren't parking across from there home but down a house across the street. This is all crazy
The ridiculous irony is, by his own testimony, his own car was parked across the street from where he wanted his parents to park. If he didn't want his neighbors parking there, why not just move his car to that spot and give the neighbor the spot on their side of the street and when his parents arrive, he can either have them stop at their driveway and he can help his mother into the house and they can park the car elsewhere, or he can move his car and allow his parents to park there WITHOUT blocking a parking spot on a public street, and they can park close to the house and he can help his Mom inside. THAT sounds like a MUCH more sensible plan to me, rather than deliberately blocking an open parking spot and causing a ruckus on a public street and antagonizing his neighbors, when he is parked on their side to begin with, just because he feels so selfish and entitled to have ALL his cars be parked close to his house, for the sake of convenience, and who cares where the neighbors park.
If there were other places to park, as the defendant said & showed on the diagram. Then why didn’t he park there?? These people have lived in this neighborhood for over 20 years. The defendant just moved into to his parent’s house and he wants to control where people can park on a public street??? The entitlement is unbelievable.
You know how THEY do! They are USED to getting their way towards us. That mom, for SURE grew up listening to her daddy and granddaddy talk about their slaves....
The law is the law It does not have "morality" or "sympathise" with your cause, Sir. If there is no legal position to take then you dont have a case. However that shove is a different story
I assume it’s because the plaintiffs sued both the son and the mother; the son for the damage to the car and the mother for the “false police report”. Since they were both listed as the defendants, they had a joint judgment.
Because they're now a "protected class"... They aren't responsible for ANY of their illegal actions anymore. They have criminals like George Floyd being martyrs for criminality.
![Judge Judy [Episode 9874] Best Amazing Cases Season 2024 Full Episodes HD](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/VazKOj1bwjI/mqdefault.jpg)
Well done Judge Judy. You have to put those people in their place.
The bully plaintiff should’ve left well enough alone and she lost 😂
She wasn’t a bully. The old lady got in her face and hit her.
@@jmelo9993she's a bully, you don't respond to a slap on the wrist to a push into the ground.
The unemployed son who moved back in with his parents should’ve left well enough alone. How dare he tell homeowners that lived in the neighborhood for over 20 years where to park. Why didn’t HE park somewhere else? He literally showed as evidence that the plaintiff could’ve parked somewhere so why didn’t he park there??
@@jasondorsett6019unfortunately you can’t control how someone will respond. You also can’t do things because you old and think people will let it ride. With that being said, the plaintiff knew she pushed that old lady down and that’s why she gotta pay her. Heck, she probably been wanting to lay hands on both of them 🤷🏽♀️
@@jmelo9993 The video evidence does not lie. The black lady did exactly that. She got in the white lady's face and gave her a push. She did it with intent to knock her over. That nasty behavior. NASTY!
The plaintiff clearly shoved the woman. For her to say, "l guess she thought about it and made herself fall to the ground." She obviously tried to imply the defendant purposely threw herself to the ground. That definitely wasn't the case. There was no pause before the defendant fell.
The plantiff wasn't being a bully. She reacted to the slap on the hand by the defendant. Although the plaintiff shove the co-defendant both women were wrong! The co-defendant receive a reactionary response to the unwarranted slap on the hand. The co-defandant shouldn't have never touched the plaintiff or confronted the plaintiff at all!
That defendant missed a serious head injury by just a few centimetres. The difference between a slap by an elderly and a shove by a much younger person is worlds apart. It is very evident that that shove was not a reflex action but pure aggression.
@@pamjsbShe shoved an elderly woman hard and she fell to the ground. She shouldn't of slapped her but what she did was much worse
@@pamjsbif that's her reaction to being slapped on the hand by an elderly lady?? Then she's got problems
Let's be real, plaintiff knew she was in trouble once JJ said she wanted to see the tape. 😂 That's why she hastened to add that it wasn't shown in court, like if that would have swayed Judy's wanting to see it.
I'm not saying the plaintiff should push the old lady but if you watch the video carefully the old lady did slap Ms Marshall on her hand before she was push..
Watch the video carefully
This man is outrageous 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂So sad Judge Judy get him❤❤❤❤
I was with the plaintiffs until I saw the video... She is a straight up liar and should have been convicted of assault. And because that lady is a disabled elderly, it makes it worse! Both groups are rotten though.
Victims? Yes. In the sense that they are a product of their upbringing, environment, and educational background. Of course, as adults, they have agency over whether they behave civilly or not, I'm simply saying the deck tilted, but not in their direction.
If she's disabled she shouldn't get up in people's face
@@ericrivera8410 She never, the Black woman walked up to her!!!! Then the Black woman clearly in the video pushed her face and body into the disabled woman staggering her back to which the disabled woman then maybe slapped her hand to which the Black woman shoved the disabled woman to the ground. How is it possible we both watch the exact same video yet you don't have the eye sight or comprehension to grasp what your own eyes saw... Mind boggling.
funny how you said the word disabled 5011 times but the disabled started the altercation by NOT going in the house, but instead, going back to her car, and then approaching a woman she is 'afraid of' to start arguing with. This is prime example of "F*** Around & Find Out." Once you make a move, the other reaction doesn't have to be on the same level... yeah, she paid for that push, but I bet Betty won't walk up to her again, looking for a fight! @@WaterspoutsOfTheDeep
The plantiff wasn't being a bully. She reacted to the slap on the hand by the defendant. Although the plaintiff shoved the co-defendant both women were wrong! The co-defendant received a reactionary response to the unwarranted slap on the hand. The co-defandant shouldn't have never touched the plaintiff or confronted the plaintiff at all!
Ms marshall has such a smug smile throughout
Both sides are smug
The defendants are entitled, but the plaintiff messed up by pushing her. It was an angry push.
He should apply for a "handicap parking spot". Then no one can park in that spot without getting towed.
He'll likely squawk about having to pay more taxes for that. His behaviour shows he's unreasonable and thinks he can do what he wants.
No one complains or rushed to save parking on my street cause it’s all paid parking 😂
I’m with the defendants.
No that wasn’t a “reflux” lmao
I knew within the first 30 seconds of the case that the defendant's son was a huge instigator. No surprise to find out that his goofy azz was trying to play parking monitor.
All this over a parking spot? Grow up people!!!
It was the white people let me park infront of your house
The level of entitlement is baffling, neither person wanted to compromise and resorted to bickering like children.
The plaintiff said that the video wasn’t shown in her other case. She wanted to show it because it would show the defendant fell on purpose. Then she said the charges had been dropped. I bet if they had that video the charges would not have been dropped.
Wow. The plaintiff brought that in?? 😂 “way to cook your own goose” 🪿 😂😂😂
@@I.am.Mrs.Mathers The producers got their hands on the video. The plaintiff did not bring it. Did you see her face when JJ said, "I understand there's a surveillance video. I'd like to see it."
I have the same parking situation where I live. I do have a certain spot I like to park in because everyone parks where they live. It’s first come first serve. We are overcrowded in this area so whoever gets a parking spot first, gets it.
So I can somewhat understand the situation in this case. However I don’t agree any violence. She should’ve not pushed that old lady. She’s more vulnerable and she could’ve died.
And all around you see an EMPTY street with tons of parking.
I can’t imagine being upset over something so PETTY
Plaintiff is petty . She admitted she never parked in front of the defendant’s home until her son moved in. She also straight up lied that she didn’t injure the defendant and she did . Thank God for the tape . Im not saying the defendants are angels they arnt but the plaintiff is a petty nasty woman and im glad Judy saw right through her . Im sorry the court didn’t find her guilty
Why even confront the elderly lady? You already parked. Go about your business. Do not engage. Then she wouldn't have, maybe, slapped your hand and even if she did, you assaulted her. You're lucky she wasn't injured even more severely. You were let off in that case. But JJ saw what really happened. Shame on you.
Well Well Well.
If the son cared so much he would park in that spot then move when the mother got home. End of story.
Oh wow pushing an elderly person like that?
I viewed this once and was looking for it to show my son.
The plaintiff’s behavior was absolutely inappropriate. The defendant gait is slow and not steady.
There was rage and anger which led to this unfortunate incident!
People choose not to get along, behaving similar to grade school students.
I understand the defendant’s son wanting his mother to have the closest parking to her home. You have to buy private property in order to have the right to park in front of your house.
The plaintiff and defendant need to buy private properties . They don’t know how to compromise.
What's wrong with their private driveways?
Why couldn’t the son just park where he told the plaintiffs to park and be done with??? The defendant literally showed judge Judy that there were other spaces to park but HE chose to park in front of the plaintiff’s house knowing that they would park in front of his mother’s house. That’s why he stood there. If he wanted his elderly mother to have the parking spot in front of her house which I understand why didn’t he just park down the street and walk and not cause problems, where there weren’t any problems for 20 years???? This man is just an unemployed entitled jerk. That’s the problem with America. That’s why this country is going to hell. I’m not excusing the plaintiff’s behavior at all no elderly person should be assaulted in such a manner but HER son is the one causing ALL the problems.
According to the diagram, they both have driveways. Why can't they use them for parking instead of the street? Did I miss something? I feel my car is safer in my driveway rather than on the street.
Everyone is wrong because they are constantly pushing each other's buttons. In the incident in the video, the plaintiff makes it sound like the defendant comes up to the plaintiff and she was defensive only. The defendant may have initiated it (may because you can not see plaintiff behind the car and could have talked first) but the plaintiff is the one who closes the distance and gets right in the defendant's face. And she did not last see her standing, she saw the fall.
Just be a kind neighbor and leave the old lady have her spot. I realize street parking is public parking and you have a right, But…. try to be a Kinder person. One day you will older! AND never push an elder like that! JJ was your karma for that deed.
The plaintiff has a driveway use it! All this nonsense! Petty & pushing the lady please grow up. The son needs to grow up too.
The male defendant looks like he uses alcohol often....
The defendants aren't even parking in front of the plaintiffs home. The plaintiffs aren't parking across from there home but down a house across the street. This is all crazy
The ridiculous irony is, by his own testimony, his own car was parked across the street from where he wanted his parents to park. If he didn't want his neighbors parking there, why not just move his car to that spot and give the neighbor the spot on their side of the street and when his parents arrive, he can either have them stop at their driveway and he can help his mother into the house and they can park the car elsewhere, or he can move his car and allow his parents to park there WITHOUT blocking a parking spot on a public street, and they can park close to the house and he can help his Mom inside. THAT sounds like a MUCH more sensible plan to me, rather than deliberately blocking an open parking spot and causing a ruckus on a public street and antagonizing his neighbors, when he is parked on their side to begin with, just because he feels so selfish and entitled to have ALL his cars be parked close to his house, for the sake of convenience, and who cares where the neighbors park.
That video was revolting. Bad behaviour by all parties.
If there were other places to park, as the defendant said & showed on the diagram. Then why didn’t he park there?? These people have lived in this neighborhood for over 20 years. The defendant just moved into to his parent’s house and he wants to control where people can park on a public street??? The entitlement is unbelievable.
You know how THEY do! They are USED to getting their way towards us. That mom, for SURE grew up listening to her daddy and granddaddy talk about their slaves....
@@msgina6880wtf why would you say something so despicable
Try College Point NY,good luck 😅
The law is the law It does not have "morality" or "sympathise" with your cause, Sir. If there is no legal position to take then you dont have a case. However that shove is a different story
Mrs Fugate does not look like she should be driving!
❤❤❤❤❤😂😂😂😂
I knew it. I knew it
Why does the mother have to pay for the deductible for the son's damage to plaintiff's car??
I assume it’s because the plaintiffs sued both the son and the mother; the son for the damage to the car and the mother for the “false police report”. Since they were both listed as the defendants, they had a joint judgment.
Disgusting how that entitled bull would confront and push an elderly woman. She could have been severely hurt from the push.
two wrongs won't make it right
All this over a parking spot. Grow up people.
Entitled meets Entitled. Stupid behavior on both parts . . .ESPECIALLY by BULLY plaintiff.
Why wasn’t the black woman charged?
Because they're now a "protected class"... They aren't responsible for ANY of their illegal actions anymore. They have criminals like George Floyd being martyrs for criminality.
YES, poor elderly lady, lucky she didn't have any broken bones. 😢😢