Rafale Jet Fighter - breakdown of the new Indian purchase - (Long Format)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 786

  • @Millennium7HistoryTech
    @Millennium7HistoryTech  4 роки тому +28

    Support me on Subscribestar www.subscribestar.com/millennium-7-history-technology
    Support me on Patreon www.patreon.com/Millennium7

    • @man15h
      @man15h 4 роки тому

      Would you be comfortable to share the name of music which you have used @2:52

    • @stupidburp
      @stupidburp 4 роки тому

      Could you please consider making a video about the Chengdu J-10? It seems like it would make a nice addition to your delta wing fighter series. As the most numerous fighter currently in the People's Liberation Army Air Force it also seems relevant to current events.

    • @man15h
      @man15h 4 роки тому

      (I know have already asked this,but assuming you didn't receive it ,) pls share the 🎶 @2:52, and yes I agree Rafael is one of the best 4.5++ gen fighter jet but I think the radio used at the nose portion could have been better considering its 2020

    • @man15h
      @man15h 4 роки тому

      Oh sorry i thought you said 40 km but I turned the subtitles on

    • @Millennium7HistoryTech
      @Millennium7HistoryTech  4 роки тому

      @@man15h It is a track called "Aphrodite" from Filmstro.com

  • @r.blakehole932
    @r.blakehole932 4 роки тому +176

    One thing I have to give the French credit for is maintaining an independent aerospace and defense capability despite the...challenges.

    • @aymericdelansalut2760
      @aymericdelansalut2760 3 роки тому +7

      It’s paramount to us !

    • @samarkand1585
      @samarkand1585 3 роки тому +7

      it's not fully independant however

    • @liammarra4003
      @liammarra4003 3 роки тому +7

      Of course. After the fremch government losing their nation-state on mamy occasions. It would behoove them to ensure such independence. Theyre lucky they were on the wests side and were strong to be so independent, or else they probably would've been slapped doiwn, embargoed, sanctioned to death, and hell, throw in a US-UK backed coup for good measure.

    • @fjordsiekl1492
      @fjordsiekl1492 3 роки тому +3

      @@liammarra4003 Can you give examples when they lost their nation-state other than WW2?

    • @stevendouglas3860
      @stevendouglas3860 3 роки тому +1

      France is already occupied by a 5th colonm

  • @tangodman
    @tangodman 4 роки тому +67

    This is hands down the best and most detailed explanation on Rafale present on any media platform. Your knowledge on this subject is exceptional. Glad I found this channel.

    • @Enuogyan
      @Enuogyan 4 роки тому

      Ok so now step 1 : spell Rafale properly 😁

    • @tangodman
      @tangodman 4 роки тому

      Thanks for finding the mistake. Autocorrect error.

    • @morso1
      @morso1 3 роки тому +2

      Aerospace engineer here....agree, great quality content

    • @NATObait
      @NATObait 2 роки тому

      @@morso1 If not factually correct.
      Rafale has not got similar performance to EFT
      Rafale engines rated;
      Dry 50kN ,Wet 75kN. Top Speed Mach 1.8
      EFT engines rated.
      Dry 60kN. Wet 90kN. Top Speed Mach 2+
      In war setting the EJ2000 give 69kN dry.
      German Airforce give Mach 2.35 as the top speed of its EF.
      EFT can Supercruise at Mach 1.5 with weapons
      Rafale can Supercruise at Mach 1.4 Clean.
      Looking at basics like Ferry Range
      Rafale with 3 X tanks 3760k
      EFT with 3 X tanks. 3700k
      When conformal tanks are fitted it would be
      greater for Rafale but EF has experimental not production tanks so it is hard to compare as we don't know what extra volumes they offer.
      The height capabilities of EFT are 19,812m
      The Rafale height capabilities are 15,835m
      The possibility of launching a missile from high speed and height give Meteor a 30% increase in range.
      So this is not a very good comparison video for the facts that are known are airbrushed .... simply the Rafale does not have similar performance.

  • @docteurpimousse2117
    @docteurpimousse2117 3 роки тому +69

    Thank you for showing respect to the French baguette. We'll always fight for it.

    • @doogleticker5183
      @doogleticker5183 3 роки тому +4

      Its origins are not French. But who cares? Fresh (warm) French baguettes are so awesome. Perfect with butter and ham slices...

    • @jean-loupdesbordes4833
      @jean-loupdesbordes4833 2 роки тому +1

      @@doogleticker5183 Well in fact if the form isn't originally french it is not the case of the recipe of the past and I am sorry but both are necessary to make it french. And as french I live the invention of the french fries to the belgians who really do know how to make them.

    • @Taketimeout3
      @Taketimeout3 11 місяців тому

      @@jean-loupdesbordes4833 Met or Zonder?

  • @atacorion
    @atacorion 3 роки тому +62

    I worked extensively alongside French Rafales in Africa. Its an amazing Aircraft with fantastic ground crews and pilots. Their mission success rate was very high and its a very mature airframe with a lot of capabilities.

    • @H3x4r35
      @H3x4r35 2 роки тому

      Are there any anecdotes you'd be willing to share without breaking OPSEC?

    • @atacorion
      @atacorion 2 роки тому

      @@H3x4r35 lotta dead jihadis in Nigeria and Chad/Mali

    • @NATObait
      @NATObait 2 роки тому

      In the Libyan conflict Gripens provided recognisance flights and didn't get targeted due to their on board abilities. When the airfield they operated from was closed by an accident they flew from the taxiway.....very impressive, just perfect for Ukraine!

    • @M1984FA
      @M1984FA Рік тому

      @@NATObait You mean when the US war machine destroyed the wealthiest and most functional country in Africa AFTER Gaddafi gave up his nuclear ambitions? Now look at the place... slave markets and Al Quaeda flags. Something to be proud of.... not

  • @paulmakinson1965
    @paulmakinson1965 3 роки тому +26

    For those interested in the Rafale, I recommend the channel of "Até", a retired French navy pilot who flew the Rafale M.

  • @nicolaspeigne1429
    @nicolaspeigne1429 3 роки тому +22

    When i saw the baguette, i couldn't help it but stand up and salute.

    • @koaalor
      @koaalor 2 роки тому

      En chantant la marseillaise :-)

  • @pritidodhia5059
    @pritidodhia5059 4 роки тому +44

    Hello sir, I am amazed with the knowledge you possess on these subjects. I have watched many of your videos before: EXTRAORDINARY!!!!

  • @gumnaamaadmi007
    @gumnaamaadmi007 3 роки тому +13

    A lot of Indians do not know this - the French have NEVER delayed the delivery of, or asked more money for(after the initial contract has been signed) any aircraft they delivered to the IAF. Unlike the Russians who keep upping the price and making us pay more and more even after a contract has been signed, the French have ALWAYS followed through on time and within budget. Remember how the cost of the INS VIkramaditya ballooned from an initial $700M to $2.5B? Or how they asked for a fortune to integrate the Brahmos to the Su-30s? Or how the Mig-29Ks have to make a trip to the hangar after every sortie due to reliability issues? Russian equipment is proving troublesome. Previous Indian governments were admittedly foolish when Dassault time and again offered to shift the M2000's assembly line here, and offered us the first -5's and -9s that the line produced. I sincerely believe that India should agree to host a future Rafale production line(if offered) and join the Franco-German-Spanish 6th gen fighter project while keeping the AMCA alive.

    • @christophechaumont2735
      @christophechaumont2735 2 роки тому +2

      Agreed

    • @NATObait
      @NATObait Рік тому

      Belgium have been refused a membership to the FCAS project and India would be given the same "you can look but not touch" answer should they ask. France never promised to build Rafale in India by setting up and certifying a production line, it was just Indian Paper Talk. As for France sticking to its cost price.......$255m dollars per unit gave a significant margin!

    • @willisfernandes2366
      @willisfernandes2366 5 місяців тому

      As an indian I agree with each and everything that you've mentioned.

  • @didierchaumet
    @didierchaumet 4 роки тому +27

    The intelligent description of the Libya mission is very compelling, and demonstrates the plane is extremely cost effective when all associated mission costs are factored in.

  • @ericksubverter8696
    @ericksubverter8696 4 роки тому +120

    _" Expensive Maybe but Really EXCELLENT!!! " , this looks Like European Chef Presenting BEST Dish in his Restaurant_
    _Much love and Respect from India !_

    • @Snp2024
      @Snp2024 4 роки тому +4

      Especially french dish minus frog legs

    • @ericksubverter8696
      @ericksubverter8696 4 роки тому +1

      @@Snp2024 lol Yeah right 👍😁

    • @VuLamDang
      @VuLamDang 4 роки тому +2

      Lol most french things in a nutshell

    • @Fabio-om4kb
      @Fabio-om4kb 4 роки тому +1

      Non pas expensive, proportionnelle a ces capacités. Sera jamais aussi chère qu'un F35 sur toute sa durée de vie.

    • @drunkcat1713
      @drunkcat1713 4 роки тому +2

      🤣🤣🤣

  • @arghya1611
    @arghya1611 4 роки тому +124

    One word for the Rafale: Elegance. Much like the French. Bring on the croissants!

    • @jamesmani5985
      @jamesmani5985 4 роки тому +4

      Sir Ji💪🚀 ♥️🏋️ Real Meaning of Rafal is power ful One of Angel of God Fight against Evils 😍

    • @vinjagvijya
      @vinjagvijya 4 роки тому +2

      You making me feel hungry and given me a travel idea

    • @max2008abhi
      @max2008abhi 4 роки тому +6

      @@jamesmani5985 that's Raphael, not rafale. Rafale is French and Raphael is Hebrew.

    • @jamesmani5985
      @jamesmani5985 4 роки тому +1

      @@max2008abhi okay 👍

    • @kloschuessel773
      @kloschuessel773 3 роки тому +1

      Well, looks like an f16 with two engines and take ins and a delta wing

  • @kolerick
    @kolerick 4 роки тому +95

    when you're so early nobody spelled it rafael yet...

    • @thepny_chasseur_de_tricera5361
      @thepny_chasseur_de_tricera5361 4 роки тому +3

      rafael is comming

    • @everlearner8974
      @everlearner8974 4 роки тому +6

      Some dumb politician in India tried to make the Rafale deal a controversy by invoking corruption but he utterly failed. He also involved Former president Francois Hollande and his girlfriend's names as well.
      Since he is dumb, he always pronounced the Fighter as Rafael jet, which the Indian media also pounced upon without any regard for cross-verification. It's pathetic but it is what it is. That's why most Indian people who just follow news don't know its original pronounciation.
      Actually, the Israeli company, Rafael should sue this Indian politician :)

    • @vinjagvijya
      @vinjagvijya 4 роки тому +1

      @@everlearner8974 @Frenchpie he is an i-talian decent so you see he is dumb - 1/10 indian 3/4 italian and remains may be a slough dna. Who wanted to purchase these f-2 version which was just for eye wash - it's like a 2002 model with a outdated interrioirs and avionics. And fool the nation to showcase it's the lates F-3 c

    • @spartanx9293
      @spartanx9293 4 роки тому

      @Frenchpie could be because it's a theoporic name

    • @vinjagvijya
      @vinjagvijya 4 роки тому +1

      @Frenchpie 🙂 got that sound and clear - the remaining 36 they want to build in india it self like the Russian multirole one. Not sure will it be manufactured here or assembled here. Need to wait and watch but good info on what has improved and what stays as is

  • @rasputin4u1
    @rasputin4u1 4 роки тому +9

    This is a most enlightening video on the capabilities of the Rafale..so far no one had treated this topic with as much depth and indepth knowledge .

  • @off_grid_javelin
    @off_grid_javelin 2 роки тому +16

    One of the biggest plus points of purchasing rafale for IAF was the fact that Eurofighter was joint venture and bad ties with any of the participants (UK, our former coloniser for e.g.) nations in future could create lack of cooperation to maintain eurofighter fleet.
    While rafale also has some components from other nations but they are replaced by french seeing that India and other future customers would highly prefer it, Although Indian indigenous tejas mk2 will be more than sufficient for IAF's need in future but the French has always came to our rescue as they're the most autonomous nation that is a part of nato.

    • @NATObait
      @NATObait 2 роки тому +1

      Don't buy FCAS that is a joint effort 🇧🇪🇪🇸🇫🇷 stick to Tejas and it's 🇺🇲 engines etc.

    • @off_grid_javelin
      @off_grid_javelin 2 роки тому +2

      @@NATObait well we won't, our plans differ as far as 5th and 6th gen fighters are concerned, read about AMCA, it's wind tunnel model is already finished since half a year ago and 1st flight will be before 2025.
      The American engines are an emergency substitute until an indigenous one is developed with French assistance.

  • @neo3804
    @neo3804 4 роки тому +31

    Good work bro, from India.
    🇮🇳🇨🇵🇮🇳🇨🇵🇮🇳🇨🇵🇮🇳🇨🇵🇮🇳🇨🇵

  • @andrewlambert7246
    @andrewlambert7246 3 роки тому +9

    The good thing with French is that they during combat exercises dont put on their radars and try not to show the capabilities of their weapons even to their allies. They usually only sniff around at exercisers and try to snap up electronic emissions of other nations radars. The Indians are also very careful about their radars.

    • @noobda4932
      @noobda4932 Рік тому +1

      Are you usaf pilot ? Do you do exercises with other nations??

  • @jetaddicted
    @jetaddicted 3 роки тому +5

    Complete and accurate.
    There are a few channels that provide quality content, this one is possibly the best of them, at least in my opinion, such luxury in details!
    Bravo.

  • @davidsuzukiispolpot
    @davidsuzukiispolpot 3 роки тому +9

    That was great. I didn't know France made such a good plane, and the sensors and sensor fusion looks very good.

  • @celestialboy
    @celestialboy 4 роки тому +43

    Took me 3yrs to find such a channel to end my curiosity 😁🙃

    • @arthurvandeman
      @arthurvandeman 3 роки тому +1

      yes, where has this channel been? nothing like it on utube.

  • @Snp2024
    @Snp2024 4 роки тому +78

    I hope India buy 110 more of these .

    • @dgap4724
      @dgap4724 4 роки тому +9

      India will have a total of 72 of them, means 36 more on IAF wishlist as of now. The ADA and DRDO/HAL are really pushing for Tejas MK2 around 2025 and the AMCA around 2024. People have doubt over it, watching the track record of hal/iaf's everchanging wish of Tejas's capabilities/flowing of funds. And Tedbf too is on the list which will gonna replace carrier-based mig29ks around 2029.

    • @dgap4724
      @dgap4724 4 роки тому +3

      @ no, I think there is no future of mmrca 2.0. that's in the dustbin now if you see the way things are taking place. There will be very less chance that IN will opt for Rafale, even if it does..the number will certainly not be 90. I think there won't be any rafale in Navy. Both navy and the govt is focusing on TEDBF . mig29ks will start phasing itself out from 2033 and TEDBF first flight is scheduled for 2029. So govt is going in that path. TEFBf is also given green light so that the air force version of it ORCA can be developed quickly on the TEFBf structure. So, if you ask me, then another 36 rafale for IAF will end the saga of buying foreign fighters IF EVERYTHINGS STAYS ON THE RIGHT PATH. And 42 sqrdn cant be achieved before 2035-40

    • @Millennium7HistoryTech
      @Millennium7HistoryTech  4 роки тому +39

      The Rafale needs at least a 70mts catapult to take off. The V. carrier doesn't have one. Maybe it could TO from the sky jump but I am pretty sure that the payload will be severely affected, up to the point of not being worth considering.
      Adding the catapult is a terribly complex job that heavily taxes the ship structure, either steam or EMALs.
      Unless India buys a new catobar, no Rafales for the Indian Navy.

    • @dgap4724
      @dgap4724 4 роки тому +6

      @@Millennium7HistoryTech Exactly. And chaps who are saying that Rafale for IN are not entirely wrong either. But things have changed in last 2-3 years and IN is seriously thinking to boost the Submarine fleet rather than diverting the fund to a new aircraft carrier, IN has 1 carrier right now i.e INs Vikramaditya and 1 will soon join the fleet in 2022 i.e INs Vikrant. but IN had a plan of constructing a CATOBAR type carrier.
      "INS Vishal, also known as Indigenous Aircraft Carrier 2 (IAC-2), is a planned aircraft carrier to be built by Cochin Shipyard Limited for the Indian Navy. It is intended to be the second aircraft carrier to be built in India after INS Vikrant (IAC-1). The proposed design of the second carrier class will be a new design, featuring significant changes from Vikrant, including an increase in displacement. An Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) CATOBAR system is also under consideration.[8] Its name Vishal means 'giant' in Sanskrit.[9]"-Wikipedia
      but as things are panning out, IN wants a large submarine fleet , than constructing a new carrier.

    • @mangeshchalan8786
      @mangeshchalan8786 4 роки тому +1

      @@Millennium7HistoryTech well we are developing orca for the carriers so I don't think we need rafel-m in airforce maybe we do

  • @manassurya2019
    @manassurya2019 4 роки тому +9

    India already paid all the initial costs for the rafale in the first batch, such as weapons, training costs, simulators, infrastructure modification, spare parts, India specific modifications, etc. That's why the initial 36 rafales cost 8.4 billion USD. If India decides to buy 36 more, the next batch will cost only about 4 billion USD. India will most probably order 36 more, for a total of 72 rafales.

    • @viharamonastry
      @viharamonastry 4 роки тому +1

      @Marcos B Indian centric r&d cost 1.8 bil $
      Training/infrastructure cost another 1 bill
      So next 36 will come for 5 bill $

  • @Taketimeout3
    @Taketimeout3 11 місяців тому +2

    You forgot to mention the stowage holes for baguettes in the cockpit. This, of course, is the most important upgrade that explains its ability to operate missions exceeding 12 hours duration.

  • @thondupandrugtsang
    @thondupandrugtsang 4 роки тому +58

    I'm thrilled that India choose the Rafale.

    • @dranzergigs8333
      @dranzergigs8333 3 роки тому +22

      It was a logical choice. Russian planes are very outdated , American planes are very expensive and have humiliating user agreement clauses, gripen is not very impressive and the eurofighter has a very complex supply chain since it s an entire EU project. France has been a reliable supplier to India for decades so the trust factor was also there.

    • @doogleticker5183
      @doogleticker5183 3 роки тому

      @@dranzergigs8333 - How many have been bought? Nuff said.

    • @dranzergigs8333
      @dranzergigs8333 3 роки тому +11

      @@doogleticker5183 36 at the moment.
      Although some unconfirmed reports say the air force is demanding 36 more.

    • @doogleticker5183
      @doogleticker5183 3 роки тому +4

      @@dranzergigs8333 - Then that is good news! Namaste.

    • @prashanthb6521
      @prashanthb6521 2 роки тому +6

      @@doogleticker5183 Indian Navy has started testing Rafale since yesterday.

  • @JDSFLA
    @JDSFLA 4 роки тому +9

    Rafale is the new jet fighter acquired BY India....from France. Thanks for the video from which I learned a lot about this plane.

    • @jamesmani5985
      @jamesmani5985 4 роки тому +1

      Yes and Customized To IAF
      Further Fighters will be Assembled. made in India 50/50💪🚀

  • @bob_leponge2277
    @bob_leponge2277 10 місяців тому +1

    Great video and content. Nice to see France still has a few strong points in its industry and engineering. It's probably worth mentioning that the French (since De Gaulle) try to maintain they sovereignty and independence when it comes to strategic industries such as defense or energy. This is one of the big competing of the last few governments which have taken damaging steps against French capability to remain truly independent militarily.
    Nevertheless, the Rafale if an incredible machine and a thing of beauty, but to be fair Dassault have done it before. The various Mirage variants are incredible machines not totally obsolete today, and in my eye the most amazing looking fighter.

  • @neelscooldude1
    @neelscooldude1 4 роки тому +97

    India should immediately order 72 more of these birds. They perfectly fit Indian needs

    • @vinjagvijya
      @vinjagvijya 4 роки тому +12

      It literally replaces 4 fighters 2 intercepter 2 bombers. That is the main reason it's called the omnirole combact aircraft

    • @haseebahmed1320
      @haseebahmed1320 4 роки тому +9

      do you have 72 more abhinandan ?

    • @neelscooldude1
      @neelscooldude1 4 роки тому +60

      @@haseebahmed1320 Abhinandan takes a 1960 MiG. Chases F16 squadron into Pakistan territory and shoots down a 2007 model F16. Then Pak in its sheer terror closes its airspace for 45 days. Imagine if Abhinandan had a Rafale. Ur F16 pilot didn't even get a janaza. Now they won't even take off

    • @pravinmeher2036
      @pravinmeher2036 4 роки тому +26

      @@haseebahmed1320 we have more abhinandans than the number of f-16's you have. Lol. Tumhare nikamme pilots ne f16 ki izzat ka faluda bana diya.
      Khairat me planes to mil gaye. Fly suar ki aulade karenge yo hashra to yahi hoga.

    • @pravinmeher2036
      @pravinmeher2036 4 роки тому +16

      @@neelscooldude1 kargil me maranewaloko janaza haasil nahi hua. Unanki lashe le janeke liye bhi paisa nahi tha en bhikhariyoke pass.

  • @williamtell1477
    @williamtell1477 4 роки тому +14

    One of the best channels on UA-cam!!

  • @inwedavid6919
    @inwedavid6919 4 роки тому +6

    In a video from indian army they talk about the MICA and adapt it on the SU30, in this official video they explain that the Mica is a little superior to the AAMRAM and a lot to its Russian counterpart, making the SU30 a far more efficient plane with it.

  • @likklej8
    @likklej8 4 роки тому +28

    French built aircraft design is beautiful it’s like fine art in the air, really good looking airplanes.I loved the Caravelle airliner!

    • @kloschuessel773
      @kloschuessel773 3 роки тому

      This plane looks like the f16 just with two engines and the delta wing design
      And french planes used to be really fucking ugly

    • @theric66
      @theric66 3 роки тому +3

      @@kloschuessel773 it doesnt look like a f16 but a mirage 2000 first the f16 didnt have a delta wing ,no canards and only one engine and lots of things are different , the f16 is the plane created by the us but has no resenblance with the rafale the f35 is certainly an ugly plane

    • @kloschuessel773
      @kloschuessel773 3 роки тому +1

      @@theric66 all nonsense
      Especially saying the f35 is ugly
      Totally retarded statement
      Have yet to see an ugly stealth plane

    • @kloschuessel773
      @kloschuessel773 3 роки тому

      @@theric66 boeings version of that one engined stealth plane was indeed to thicc

    • @theric66
      @theric66 3 роки тому +2

      @@kloschuessel773 stealth plane doesnt mean nice the shape of the f35 is ugly and dont insult me for saying that, grow up and respect the fact that some people dont agree with you

  • @hectorherbert6585
    @hectorherbert6585 3 роки тому +5

    Dassault Aviation has integrated their combat systems in the late private jet FALCON where the pilots can fly only by visuals on a large screen in any weather with an all weather camera even by a foggy night on a blacked out runway ,very impressive..

  • @hangie65
    @hangie65 3 роки тому +2

    Excellent series of videos reviewing the Rafale in all its version. Many thanks for posting!

  • @betterworld6166
    @betterworld6166 Рік тому +1

    Very informative video , very clear explanation. This is also the first video of yours which i was able to understand fully. i have tried many others videos as well.

  • @yumyum7309
    @yumyum7309 4 роки тому +3

    Greetings from France! Great video, nice to see you again!

  • @mrspaceman2764
    @mrspaceman2764 Рік тому +1

    I didn't know that part about the French in Libya. Pretty bad ass!

  • @abrahkadabra9501
    @abrahkadabra9501 3 роки тому +11

    Just subscribed and really enjoying the content. 👍 This is probably the only combat aviation channel on UA-cam that actually presents factual quality information and refrains from tribal chest thumping. You should have 10 X the subscribers you have now!

  • @bernardotorres2532
    @bernardotorres2532 3 роки тому +12

    I liked the slow paced way in which the host talked,, if it had been an American or an British host he would have talked noticeably faster, and slow paced talk is a good thing for a listener who is hearing matters that are rather different to what he/she is familiar with.

  • @XR190190
    @XR190190 4 роки тому +7

    I live in France and saw 2 Rafale training in the sky. Then suddenly the two of them had like a bubble popping around them ? Then 2 consecutive big BOOM, making my windows shake ! It was 2 days ago and the news said those 2 Rafale were training going past the wall of sound and that it was the cause of the big BOOM ! Such an incredible plane !

    • @XR190190
      @XR190190 4 роки тому +1

      @Pavan Kumar They do in France, it's not that unusual

  • @hectorherbert6585
    @hectorherbert6585 3 роки тому +9

    Note that the Rafale has 'killed' a F22 twice in simulated combat in the USA....the talent of a pilot is most important too..!!

  • @परशुरामएकशिवभक्त

    People comparing Rafale with J20,but let me tell you this *_"A knight in shining armor is a man who has never had his metal truly tested."_*
    J20 hasn't been into any war or battle whereas Rafale is battle tested and actively participated in Libyan war and ongoing Syria & Iraq conflict...

    • @bing3820
      @bing3820 4 роки тому +3

      Sure. Combat experience in war zones with practically no enemy air power is better than nothing I guess

    • @prasmitkumarpradhan1497
      @prasmitkumarpradhan1497 4 роки тому +1

      @@bing3820 😂😂😂 but Turkish army get bombed by this plane bcoz they didn't get it in radar

    • @jkmcgregor7797
      @jkmcgregor7797 2 роки тому

      Libya and Syria with no opposition in the air is not battle tested.

    • @alainprostbis
      @alainprostbis 2 роки тому

      @@jkmcgregor7797 simply not true. ground-to-air-missiles-tested is battle-tested.

    • @jkmcgregor7797
      @jkmcgregor7797 2 роки тому

      @@alainprostbis no opposition fighters not tested

  • @arupdas4657
    @arupdas4657 4 роки тому +6

    Great Info. Now I know why India ordered Rafale to handle a two front war as it does not have dedicated SEAD capability unlike the US.

  • @anilbundhoo7486
    @anilbundhoo7486 4 роки тому +3

    I salute you sir. Thank you for this excellent analysis. You definitely know what you are talking about. You have a new subscriber.

  • @supratiksaha2001
    @supratiksaha2001 4 роки тому +6

    Rafael is good. But nobody in India can ever forget those beautiful Mirage-2000 fighters launching bunker blasters on the hills of Kargil and of course Balakot air strike.👍👍👍👍

    • @Millennium7HistoryTech
      @Millennium7HistoryTech  4 роки тому +3

      I don't know what you think but I can't look back at destruction with nostalgia, any of it, anywhere.

    • @sharequsman596
      @sharequsman596 2 роки тому

      How u people can still talk about that mess as a victory is just laughable

  • @celtoroma4013
    @celtoroma4013 4 роки тому +2

    Greece has just fast tracked the acquisition of 18 Rafales. When facing an aggressive regime, there is diplomacy and there is Rafale diplomacy. I predict additional orders from India very soon. If your neighbours are cool and wealthy, buy Gripen. If not, and if America doesn't really care about you (like Greece or India), Rafale is a good option. If your sky is safe, do as the French, have a Baguette!

  • @darveshzamindar
    @darveshzamindar 4 роки тому +8

    A good video 👍 after a long time.

  • @AFMR0420
    @AFMR0420 3 роки тому +4

    I hadn’t previously realized that the Rafale had such a high loiter time or super cruise capabilities.

    • @NATObait
      @NATObait 2 роки тому

      Rafale can Supercruise at Mach 1.4 Clean
      EFT can Supercruise at Mach 1.5 with weapons
      F22 can Supercruise at Mach1.82 with weapons
      Impressive but even Gripen E claims it can Supercruise at Mach 1.2 with weapons and its top speed is Mach 2.

  • @oclastax
    @oclastax 4 роки тому +2

    Very nice video man, you really deserv way more subscribers than what you have !

  • @VishnuKamath
    @VishnuKamath Рік тому +1

    I feel India should have gone for JAS as we could have brought more. India should have taken license production of Rafale. Compared to PLAAD, IAF has less fighters. We need atleast 200-300 of rafales.

  • @hectorherbert6585
    @hectorherbert6585 3 роки тому +8

    Note that France is a very small country but the 5th military power in the world with a nasty Nuclear Submarine fleet ,builds some of the best commercial planes with AIRBUS ,build the most effective nuclear power plants/reactor all over the world(including China) and has a massive space program with ARIANE E-SPACE....also makes great cheese,bread and best wine in the world...not bad...(and lose women..!!)

  • @harishkiran3663
    @harishkiran3663 4 роки тому +11

    Can Brahmos be integrated with Rafael?!

    • @neelscooldude1
      @neelscooldude1 4 роки тому +9

      Pretty sure it is. But the customisation specifics are not made public. But just looking at the price that India has paid, its pretty obvious they asked for Brahmos mounting capability

    • @mayankrajsinghchauha
      @mayankrajsinghchauha 4 роки тому

      No because brahmos is of russian origin . Its nearly impossible ...We are buying Hammer missile though

    • @depakranjanb6717
      @depakranjanb6717 4 роки тому

      @@mayankrajsinghchauha brahmos was jointly developed by India and Russia. So India definitely would like the option of arming rafale with brahmos.

    • @Kal_sengupta
      @Kal_sengupta 4 роки тому

      @@mayankrajsinghchauha Too little of information to a underdeveloped brain is a very dangerous thing !!!

  • @Pranith_
    @Pranith_ 4 роки тому +5

    Excellent.... really informative video...

  • @KernowekTim
    @KernowekTim 4 роки тому +7

    Good on ya France. Yet another really very fine fighter aircraft.

  • @sudhakarbe
    @sudhakarbe Рік тому +1

    All the more reason why India chose Rafael!!!

  • @FlamesOfThought
    @FlamesOfThought 3 роки тому

    such an excellent presentation video. Thank you, that was top draw. Off to Patreon now

  • @aleksandarjevremovic1028
    @aleksandarjevremovic1028 3 роки тому

    Best, most informative, extremely well explained aviation Chanel available. Great job man. Its plesure to follow you. Greetings from Serbia.

  • @GenoGENOVA
    @GenoGENOVA 4 роки тому +9

    Astra - Matra - MICA IR/EN - Meteor

  • @marc9080
    @marc9080 Рік тому

    Vous êtes un vrai passionné et un connaisseur, c'est rare sur YTube! merci, cet avion est le meilleur dans sa catégorie voir plus mais la France communique d'une manière différente des autres pays! Dassault est un fabuleux constructeur d'avion de guerre! et il n'a rien a envier à personne pas même à LM! pour terminer j'apporte une modification nouvelle plus récente sur la capacité et la détection via le pod de Thales, le Damocles a été remplacé par le Thalios!

  • @sufianansari4923
    @sufianansari4923 7 місяців тому

    26:35 hey a little of topic my good sir, but what is the tune in the background here? ps great video

  • @off_grid_javelin
    @off_grid_javelin 2 роки тому +1

    Although nato has been very "do gooding" kind of organization for middle east (lolz),
    but I don't think even F35s will be flying anywhere near eastern libyan airspace if S400s are ACTUALLY deployed there, Nato clearly does not wants to find that fight's outcome, as we saw with turkey too.

    • @NATObait
      @NATObait 2 роки тому +1

      F35 and it's stand off weapons are designed for S400. We are not seeing great ability from S400 in Ukraine are we.

  • @KingKong-os7iv
    @KingKong-os7iv 3 роки тому +3

    Great aircrafts. But by favourite is still the Mirage of the french ACs :)

  • @jenuvs4886
    @jenuvs4886 4 роки тому +7

    Absolutely loved the detailed content and highly appreciate the quality of the content. I genuinely wish people showed a little more appreciation to such quality awesome videos, than the normal click bait ones.. Kudos guys.. Lots of love from India.

  • @morso1
    @morso1 3 роки тому +2

    Love the long Version breakdown

  • @vikkris
    @vikkris 4 роки тому +5

    You haven't mentioned anything specific to the Indian version and Customisation... would have been good to provide this as the title mentions India

    • @anupampaul7342
      @anupampaul7342 4 роки тому +1

      that cannot be public information ofcourse 🙂

    • @neelscooldude1
      @neelscooldude1 4 роки тому

      Indian customization is still not made public for obvious reasons

    • @bolzdk9032
      @bolzdk9032 4 роки тому

      It's for algorithm, the video probably showed up in your feed right?

    • @vikkris
      @vikkris 4 роки тому

      @@neelscooldude1 @Anupam Paul
      there are already few articles online on this....
      www.businessinsider.in/slideshows/tech/rafale-fighter-jets-special-features/slidelist/71278070.cms
      m.hindustantimes.com/india-news/france-speeds-up-rafale-fighter-jet-deliveries-on-iaf-s-special-request/story-d52eideBabhi6BG9Nhmu5J.html

  • @richardcarr6493
    @richardcarr6493 3 роки тому +1

    l like the way french defenses think ,if opportunity presents itself take it :)

  • @emmanuelcarre6796
    @emmanuelcarre6796 7 місяців тому

    vous avez réussi à m'apprendre tellement de choses sur mon jet préféré ! Merci Monsieur !

  • @Kenny-yl9pc
    @Kenny-yl9pc 3 роки тому +4

    This jet is such a beauty

  • @KarthikSoun
    @KarthikSoun 4 роки тому +19

    50 cent PLA trollololo are reading this but where are they? Tired.. Michel, Michelle, Pedro what name did you select today?

  • @michaelrunnels7660
    @michaelrunnels7660 2 роки тому +1

    If you feel an obligation to show a baguette if you show a French fighter, then please show a hot dog when you show an American fighter.

  • @martinabowm1786
    @martinabowm1786 2 місяці тому

    Rafale - a typically French product! So very elegant! Only thing missing is a Bèret on the Canopy!😉

  • @campeador94
    @campeador94 4 роки тому +7

    These are the same videos uploaded earlier, just merged into one.

    • @Millennium7HistoryTech
      @Millennium7HistoryTech  4 роки тому +11

      Yes, sometimes I do it. Many of my videos are fragmented in different episodes that have different viewership. Some may not even be aware that there are other videos or may not find them. As a secondary video of the week, it may be a decent service for the viewers.

    • @campeador94
      @campeador94 4 роки тому +4

      @@Millennium7HistoryTech oh okay. Thanks for the clarification. Huge fan here. I have watched many of your videos. Thank you for the quality content. Appreciate it and love from India!

  • @Robert_Kawalec
    @Robert_Kawalec 4 роки тому +1

    As usually, Great piece of material. Really interesting. Please cover SAAB JA 37 Viggen in future videos. Keep it up.

  • @chandrachurniyogi8394
    @chandrachurniyogi8394 Рік тому +1

    Indian Air Force needs to upgrade it's existing fleet of 36 Dassault Rafale EH (F3-R) multi role interdictor strike fighter to F4-1R & F4-2R standards asap . . . the 50 kN Snecma M88-4E afterburning turbofan engines needs to be upgraded with high thrust variants of the Snecma M88-4E afterburning turbofan engines, either from off the shelf or tailor made . . . it'll generate somewhere around 62.9 kN of dry thrust & 88.3 kN in full afterburner mode . . . a 4.5 gen multi role fighter jet able to supercruise at Mach 2.3 needs way more powerful turbofan engines, period . . . especially when a Rafale F4-R is laden with fuel & weaponry . . . new built brand new Dassault Rafale EH (F4-R) multi role interdictor strike fighter will feature 56% composite airframe & 44% advanced lithium alloys . . . specific reinforcements incorporated into the fuselage & wings, wherever necessary in the airframe . . . plus strengthened forward & aft landing gears . . . all glass touchscreen cockpit & new highly advanced zero-zero Martin Baker Mk21 pilot ejection seat, that is custom made for the Dassault Rafale F4-R multi role interdictor strike fighter only . . . improved fly-by-wire controls & AESA radar . . . the Indian Air Force is seriously considering acquiring an additional fleet of 83 - 89 brand new Dassault Rafale F4-R multi role interdictor strike fighter by 2028 . . . alongwith it's dedicated airframe specific air-to-air & air-to-surface ordinance . . .

  • @zfriendlybiz
    @zfriendlybiz 4 роки тому +2

    Rafale will help to keep topnotch tech touch for France alive. It will also help boos defense economy of France.

  • @onesec8005
    @onesec8005 4 роки тому

    Very thorough, detailed, and informative. Great work. Thank you.

  • @rajendrakumarshivalingarad724
    @rajendrakumarshivalingarad724 4 роки тому

    Very frank, bold , straightforward, neat analysis with proper inputs 😎

  • @gandigooglegandigoogle7202
    @gandigooglegandigoogle7202 10 місяців тому +1

    RAFALE the great !

  • @huizhang54
    @huizhang54 2 роки тому

    Great post! Big fan here

  • @piwi2005
    @piwi2005 4 роки тому +1

    Hi,
    I tried to found this interview from the Rafale pilot that you are citing in the end, but I could not find it. Could you post the link to that interview ?
    Many thanks !

    • @szwrph
      @szwrph 4 роки тому

      I've read it some years ago, i think you must research an 5-6 years old interview.

    • @Lapantouflemagic0
      @Lapantouflemagic0 4 роки тому +1

      i can't tell you which interview it is, but there is a former Rafale pilot on YT who said extremely similar things (look for "ATE" CHUET). that's probably something pilots are taught in military school.

  • @VELS436
    @VELS436 3 роки тому +1

    Your are best aviation channel ...❤️😍 Thank you ..Please talk about helicopters too...

  • @Tetemovies4
    @Tetemovies4 4 роки тому +1

    1:10 and there's also that there was pressure to build a new fighter for the navy which the 2000 wasn't.
    If there was only the air force i wonder if they would have went for the 2000-9.
    Regarding active cancellation it is physically doable and it seems believable that it would work against older radars, but against an Aesa that can use multiple frequencies and quickly switch frequency, i have a hard time believing they would be able to effectively cancel the signal.

    • @stupidburp
      @stupidburp 4 роки тому

      Theoretically active cancellation could still work but would require a powerful computer and highly capable sensors. With the advances in computing power and sensors over the last decades, I find it plausible that such methods could still be effective, at least to some degree. There would also be a variety of other electronic warfare methods available using the same hardware and some combination of these should be able to make it much more difficult to isolate the Rafale as a target. Enough to give the Rafale an advantage in many scenarios anyways.

    • @Tetemovies4
      @Tetemovies4 4 роки тому

      @@stupidburp I see how lightning kick reaction times or knowledge of the frequencies program the enemy will use - assuming it's not randomized - would help but how could computer power solve that problem?

    • @stupidburp
      @stupidburp 4 роки тому

      @@Tetemovies4 It helps to react to multiple simultaneous transmissions on different frequencies and determine the matching opposite waveforms for each without delay. With a single or just a few sources this can be done with simple hardware - like noise cancellation headphones. But with a thousand different channels hopping frequencies in different patterns it becomes a much more demanding task. There are other secret ways that can use computing power to enhance electronic warfare and I am only vaguely aware of how a few of them might work but I do know that processing power is required.

    • @shi01
      @shi01 4 роки тому

      In case of fooling older Radars, it was already proven that this is possible with a simple hook on ECM-Pod. ua-cam.com/video/6KBmv6HBltM/v-deo.html

  • @jacobcyriac432
    @jacobcyriac432 10 місяців тому

    Appreciate the details of the Rafale , but I don't see anything about the Indian Rafale, which as I understand, is slightly different. Was looking to hear some of that, but there was none! Anyways greatly appreciated.

  • @kajjansson9481
    @kajjansson9481 3 роки тому

    Wonder if there would be an episode with the eurofighter upcoming upgrades? Also, I cannot see any coverings of the Eurofighter - why not?

  • @zagrepcanin82
    @zagrepcanin82 3 роки тому +1

    we;Croatia,have great relations with France....We bought 12 Rafale jets and became owner of Bugatti so big like to our cooperation

  • @titouanreynaud1345
    @titouanreynaud1345 4 роки тому +2

    The M88 has 75kN of thrust with the afterburner, you said 50kN ans that’s right but just without the afterburners.

    • @stupidburp
      @stupidburp 4 роки тому +1

      Safran has also tested uprated variants of M88 with over 100kN wet thrust.

    • @ludovicbon5903
      @ludovicbon5903 4 роки тому +2

      @@stupidburp yes but the the structure of the plane must be modified and it needs bigger air intakes

  • @vishalyadav3816
    @vishalyadav3816 4 роки тому +6

    You pointed the finger but no linked or video popedup 😅

    • @TuxPanther
      @TuxPanther 4 роки тому +3

      It's because of stealth fingers.

  • @geekdaddy5351
    @geekdaddy5351 4 роки тому +1

    Great presentation! Thanks!

  • @atlet1
    @atlet1 4 роки тому +5

    Rafale spercruise at M1.4 clean. Gripen E supercruise at M1.2+ with 6missiles and centertank. Rafale can carry 14000kg of fuel an weapons. Gripen E can carry 8500kg of fuel and weapons and need much less fuel.

    • @unepintade
      @unepintade 4 роки тому

      "Need much less fuel" I wonder why 🤔

    • @MS-pm7rh
      @MS-pm7rh 4 роки тому +10

      Rafale supercruise at Mach 1.4 with 6 Mica missiles and Mach 1.2 with 4 Mica missiles and a 1250 l center tank . It is the only fighter who can carry 150% of its empty load.

    • @atlet1
      @atlet1 4 роки тому +1

      @@unepintade less drag and single engine.

    • @atlet1
      @atlet1 4 роки тому +1

      @@MS-pm7rh 14/10*100=140% 8.5/8*100=106%. Rafale can take 14/8.5*100=165% of Gripen E load. To compare usefull load, we have to guess the difference in fuel consumption: Gripen E have internal fuel of 3400kg and Rafale may need 180% of that. 1.8*3400=6120. 6120-1400=1420. Gripen E can take 8500-3400=5100. 6120/5100*100=120% of useful load, compared to Gripen E. Yes, Rafale seem to be a very potent fighter airplane in many different missions. Just as Gripen E. One reason is the close coupled delta-canard configuration. The two fighters is the only ones in the world with that.

    • @unepintade
      @unepintade 4 роки тому +3

      @@atlet1 that was a joke ...

  • @googlebhai7529
    @googlebhai7529 4 роки тому +4

    What's is the part in tail ? Box type 😁

    • @benmol_
      @benmol_ 4 роки тому +3

      It's a part of the spectra system (electronic warfare / incoming missiles detection / "active stealth")

    • @googlebhai7529
      @googlebhai7529 4 роки тому +1

      @@benmol_ wow , thank you 🙏

  • @GSteel-rh9iu
    @GSteel-rh9iu Рік тому +1

    Mirage looks very bad ass.

  • @RP-qs1tp
    @RP-qs1tp 4 роки тому +12

    I think we should order 90 more as, 45 for IAF and 45 for IN as Navy also needs extra fighters.
    Reason is, we planned 126 aircraft, with the new uniform command policy we will have all 90 available when required. Rafale is very costly so we cannot invest more even if we want and we should spend the rest on Indian projects. Having one plane will save ISE costs and SCM costs as well. ( Having one more foreign plane F18 for IN even though good will not have these advantages )

    • @amitwali3565
      @amitwali3565 4 роки тому

      Rafale naval version may not be compatible with vikramaditya or any of the future aircraft carriers of Indian navy which under construction as rafale naval version doesn't come with foldable wings.

    • @RP-qs1tp
      @RP-qs1tp 4 роки тому

      @@amitwali3565 Yes, but its already smaller in size than F18 so thats the reason it does not have and need those foldable wings

    • @bjornnordstrom
      @bjornnordstrom 4 роки тому

      Who are ”we”?

    • @RP-qs1tp
      @RP-qs1tp 4 роки тому

      @@bjornnordstrom Indians, as the heading pointed to India so I used it general as its about Rafale and Indian aircraft purchases

    • @RP-qs1tp
      @RP-qs1tp 4 роки тому +1

      @@bjornnordstrom Story is around 2004 India put out a request for 126 medium weight fighters, Rafale won in around 2012 but nothing moved forward. In 2016 GOI decided to purchase 36 Rafale as stop gap and so India is still short by 90 aircrafts from original plan after 16 years :) . There is again a tender out in market for 114 MWF aircrafts. There is also a 2nd tender for 57 carrier based aircrafts for 2nd carrier. That is short summary and background :).

  • @celtoroma4013
    @celtoroma4013 3 роки тому +1

    Greece outnumbered with an aggressive and well equipped enemy (the Ottomans) has learnt from the Indian defense strategy policy against China. Get Rafales now!

  • @gorabose334
    @gorabose334 3 роки тому

    How is the combination of Rafael and SU-30MKI currently with the IAF ?
    How does Mirage 2000, Jaguar, MIG29 and Tejas set into the basket

  • @KRW628
    @KRW628 4 роки тому +3

    Sacre Bleu!. I'm in Chicago. I haven't had a true baguette in 10 years or more.

    • @Millennium7HistoryTech
      @Millennium7HistoryTech  4 роки тому

      Oh no!

    • @williamf.7655
      @williamf.7655 4 роки тому +1

      @@Millennium7HistoryTech oh mon Dieu! 10 ans sans baguette!!! But it means that you haven't eat any cheese sice as long!!! Your life must be so sad! I will enjoy bread and camembert or roquefort for you this evening, and a glass of burgundy. Probably Crozes Hermitage. (Of course, i'm french) .

    • @KRW628
      @KRW628 4 роки тому +2

      William, in Chicago we do have DEEP dish pizza The T-Rex of pizza, A meal in every slice. But a real baguette is heaven in your mouth.

    • @philblou3832
      @philblou3832 4 роки тому

      Et vous n en aurez jamais , vous n avez pas la bonne farine ( adequat)

  • @seanpaulluke
    @seanpaulluke 4 роки тому

    Great content once again! Bravo 👏

  • @billwhoever2830
    @billwhoever2830 3 роки тому +2

    the indians are planning to use brahmos missiles (brahmos ng) on the rafales

  • @mhorasail
    @mhorasail 4 роки тому +1

    Is Indian choice the right one.. what is the 5 th generation option..

  • @denhed78
    @denhed78 4 роки тому +16

    Nice with some Swedish made baguette ;)

    • @Millennium7HistoryTech
      @Millennium7HistoryTech  4 роки тому +3

      😋

    • @Raj-nh3fc
      @Raj-nh3fc 4 роки тому +4

      Nice catch. They are actually Swedish baguettes! But at least they are made with sour dough technique as it says on the label. It is perhaps a fine way of paying tribute to the land of the DRAKEN, the father of odd Delta wings.😃

    • @WorldCitizenX
      @WorldCitizenX 3 роки тому

      @@Raj-nh3fc wrong, the first delta wing fighter was convair F102, usa, but nice joke anyway

    • @Raj-nh3fc
      @Raj-nh3fc 3 роки тому

      @@WorldCitizenX why let the historical facts get in the way of a cool story? 😃

    • @WorldCitizenX
      @WorldCitizenX 3 роки тому

      @@Raj-nh3fc Because history is not his story? :)

  • @SM_Fato
    @SM_Fato 4 роки тому +8

    Congrats from Pakistan to India for Rafale Acquisition

  • @ritwikg2818
    @ritwikg2818 4 роки тому +2

    Your videos has best analysis

  • @keshavkishore3745
    @keshavkishore3745 4 роки тому +1

    That conformal fuel tanks look so cool