I was once in a position like the lawyer where I witnessed an accident. Except it was a older man who just drove off the road and I just parked and asked him if he was okay and told him I would call 911. Fortunately I went to Warren the next car that was coming to slow down on the curve in the road and it was a State trooper. A briefed the trooper on what just happened and went on my way. The lady in the video should learn sometimes less is more. I just wonder what kind of law school she went to.
She isn't just a good Samaritan. She knew him. How did they think she knew he was a minor and how did she know the father's phone number? In the full video, she says she's a family friend. I understand why she was trying to help their friend. Once AGAIN they don't play the FULL video. Her only problem was how she handled it. The cops didn't handle it right either.
She’s annoying af and I don’t blame them for taking her down. She’s trying to tell him how things are gonna happen, they don’t even know yet. And for her to say he’s “beating the sh!t” out of her shows she rarely faces adversity. If any domestic abuse victim saw this, they would never choose her to defend them. Smh. Sit in your damn car and watch them and get in for for the father when you can. Dont act like you have authority over any police officers there.
Great stuff for “ Karen-the-alleged-roadside-attorney gets butt hurt and looks for a payday! The screaming banshee just can’t believe that cops are underwhelmed with her alleged profession. As I said on another’s rendering of this video “David Shuster” who claimed this woman knew the kid and or father, she not only put everyone on scene at further risk on a busy highway, but even herself as she resisted arrest and pulled away from police. It wouldn’t be the first time a UA-cam video depicted someone who resisted and ran into traffic and got killed as a result. Thanks for the critique, it’s most welcome & realistic.
8:20The phone could clarify many questions that the officer asked this young man and avoid unnecessary confusion. That is what every good police officer should know after encountering someone who suffered a brain trauma.
Listen to what she claims in her lawsuit. This woman is pathetic! “In the lawsuit Hall filed on Aug. 31, she alleges that she suffered injuries to her shoulders, teeth, breasts and bladder, along with “psychological damage, emotional distress, embarrassment, humiliation and loss of bodily functions” when she was “assaulted, restrained, forcefully thrown to the ground, and had a knee placed on her body before she was handcuffed.” Loss of bodily function. You can’t make this up
Narcissists seek attention no matter the situation. If the accident had been more serious, she'd have done the same thing as the victims bled out. The fact that it's negative attention is meaningless. She makes herself the center to boost her ego, and when all you have is a grandiose delusional ego, it must be boosted at all cost in the face of reality. It's a never ending, exhausting compulsion.
Seems so. The way she was acting was crazy, but she had the idea to help(even if potentially selfish reasons). To me there is no innocent side here other than the kid, however the most guilty still by far is the lawyer woman. Kid wasnt even detained or arrested, she just made it 100x worse though
The worst part is she filled the lawsuit before she got out of the charges. If the charges stick then that makes the lawsuit soooo much harder. Not a very smart or good lawyer if you ask me.
I’ve pulled over to be a Good Samaritan and once in an almost identical situation. The cops seemed appreciative that I and another woman stopped to help and take care of calling parents and comforting the teen so they could do whatever nonsense they do. That lady seemed a little… *much*. No need for stepping in the middle of something so aggressively. If outside help is needed, it’ll be obvious
I happened to stumble upon this video in my recommended list & I’m thrilled that I clicked on it!! Had a blast listening to y’all joke w some sass, wit & sarcasm yet at the same time gave us some good factual info too ❤❤
4:31 - Calling Claire Hall a bitch would be disrespectful to real bitches aka the good girl dogs who are full of love and joy if you keep ‘em fed, sheltered, and loved; but she is a charlie-uniform-november-tango of an individual for obstructing the traffic stop and resisting arrest. • She been told. Now look at her.
I think the officers get an A. Mainly because she was demanding and it was clear that she wasn't going to budge on the pedestal she she standing on. This isn't a situation that demanded the amount of push back she was giving.
I might be taking back my comment. If this starts from first contact. It took a minute and a half from first contact to them putting hands on her. Do I still think she may be a Karen...yes. However the LEOs could've have handled this much better. When she mentioned a hospital the question should've been, why do you think he needs medical attention. I now think the officers reacted too quickly
According to a different video, one of the teens had suffered a minor head injury, and was having trouble working his own cell phone to call his dad. That is why the lady had inserted herself to be the mouthpiece for that kid and use his phone.
Sure, but the cops don't know that. To them some random lady with a random guy on their phone is asking questions about a minor, including medical information, at an accident scene that they're still trying to get under control
@@tsmcgu she was definitely annoying, but the other video was much longer and included more information than what was seen here. I do think the cop was aware of the head injury because they didn’t allow him to move the car out of the road because of it.
Provide a link to this mysterious video that exonerates this Karen then. If it’s a video of yet another ‘guess’ trying to understand this Karen’s puzzling roadside court appearance, then I’ll expect to hear more excuses for Karen’s bad behaviour from you without the video you claim to have seen. Or you’ll pretend you didn’t read this post and say nothing.
@@AndyJayroe The minor's condition is immaterial to what the woman is doing. He's a minor, he's the cops responsibility, they can't release him or his information to some person they (and the minor) don't know. She wanted to help. Great. She helped. The kid is with professionals now who can take care of him. Give your information and walk away, or at the very least step back and let them do their job
She doesn't have a right to be this kids representative though. She doesn't have a right to demand information about the kid. If she wants to let the officers know the kid is concussed and needs medical attention and pass the phone over, awesome. Shouting "WHAT AM I SUPPOSED TO TELL THE DAD THEN??!?!?!" Is like "idc lady, tell him whatever you want, let me do my job."
I honestly hope this channel blows up! You guys are so good on these videos. I've watched them all. Informative & Hilarious. I hope this also makes your business boom. Use genuinely deserve it. Keep posting 👍
Cars, trucks barreling down at 80,90 mph. These police officers need to secure the highway NOW. No time to argue with some deranged 'good samaritan' attorney.
She should be disbarred for putting everybody’s lives at risk including her own by arguing with police officer at a traffic investigation around fast moving traffic. Also, I think she’s trying to help that young good looking boy so he’ll befriend her and give her some. That’s not a good Samaritan, I think she’s trying to groom her next victim.
If she's an attorney and she was supposed to represent me, I think I speak for plenty of people when I say I'd either fire her to get a different attorney or choose to represent myself. If this is how she acts outside of a courtroom I'd imagine her screaming inside a courtroom and how uncomfortable it'd make everyone feel. It sounds like a good defense strategy to make a jury want to be done with hearing her or seeing her but when it'd be my butt on the line, I don't think so.
BIG fan of, and much respect for, Derek & Kelly! With seemingly infinite channels of police bodycam vids, this is the only channel providing truly informed & entertaining commentary with law-based practicality. THANK YOU!!! I watch every DDTeam vid b/c this channel often feels like the only safe haven of sanity, fairness, & rational (informed) thought. Again, THANK YOU! I googled this 'lawyer' out of curiosity about what others, especially in RI, are saying. After 5 min of reading commentary on social media, I had to watch 3 past DDTeam vids to calm down. ~80% of the commentary (I know, I know--not representative of reality, or is it?) on Twitter & UA-cam say the officers are in the wrong b/c they had a duty to deescalate the situation, & the dept failed in not training these officers properly..................... Please tell me if I'm wrong, but the officers' DUTY was (1) to the HEALTH & SAFETY of the driver (who was reported to have sustained leg, and potentially serious head injuries), and anyone on the highway - standing, pacing, exhibiting irrationality; and (2) investigating, upholding, & enforcing THE LAW. Scientific research (which I am educated, informed, & experienced) supports the theory that law enforcement would likely be more efficient in carrying out these duties (1) & (2) by manipulating the "mirroring effect" (when communicating, especially 1-on-1, both individuals are likely to consciously or subconsciously 'mirror' the other in thought process, emotion, behavior, or some combination of the three). But, customer service & restorative therapy are NOT police DUTIES. The 2 are likely to be 'Best Practices,' or ideal methods, but if law enforcement can't fulfill their actual duties, then legally detaining/arresting is what has to happen. Or am I wrong? This woman's behavior was escalating in a way that prevented at least 1 officer (at least 2, according to her own lawsuit) from investigating, upholding, or enforcing, and had already posed a specific threat to at least 3 people's H&S (not including any motorist). WHY? Again, correct me if I'm wrong...She KNOWS that she is right. About everything. And everyone. Everywhere. All the time. It's an unfortunately pervasive perspective. Research is being done across the country studying the effects of the Covid lockdown, specifically the need to be confident that I/ME is/am more right/informed/smarter than anyone, including the most experienced professionals in that area, even with no reasonable justification. 'I was never told my rights, so you can't arrest me;' 'I can't be arrested if I don't agree with anything the officer says,' 'I say I'm a SovCit, so no laws apply to me,' 'It's against the law for police to be rude, or anything I say is rude or against the law,' 'I have to hear AND acknowledge AND receive paperwork stating the words "FINAL WARNING" before I can be arrested." Translate any of the above to any profession, and just the thought drives me to play All the DDTeam videos on a loop 24 hrs a day. I can't remember the first vid that Derek and Kelly said, "...regardless, just do what the officers tell you to do, and let us go to court and deal with the problem there. You can't solve a problem, but you CAN make it so much worse." Why is it so hard for so many people to listen to the professionals (multiple, not singular)?
I don't think the cop was actually too quick because she was identifying herself as a lawyer. If she's really a lawyer who actually understands the laws pertaining to this situation then the cops shouldn't have to explain them to her.
The husband is probably the one suing for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress because of having to hear her go on and on about what a victim she is. Actually, he probably does deserve some money! LOL!
The actions of a good samaritan are only allowed and necessary until the arrival of personnel with higher qualifications to handle the emergency situation, medical or public safety. When the police arrived they automatically assumed the responsibility of taking care of the situation, assesding the medical needs of any victims and ensuring the safety of motorists and pedestrians in the accident scene area. Her presence and actions were a willful hindrance to the cops in trying to do their jobs.
Attorneys always tell their clients not to argue w police on the roadside & wait for court. This lady however ignored all good advice from other lawyers and argues w police on the roadside in something she admits she wasn’t even involved in.
Lawyers argue that’s their job. Her mistake was not having the legal guardian of the minor hire her as their attorney. Had she done that then she’d have much more legal standing to be involved. But she’s an idiot so she was carted off like a suitcase q
@@robertcahill9942She probably would have been allowed to stay but honestly that kid would have been better off by himself, the police don't have to let you speak to your lawyer until after you have been processed anyway, the most she could have learned is where he would be going but he could have just told that to his dad over the phone himself. It's hard to say what would make a lawyer come across as this ignorant of what to do in this situation, it honestly looks like she may be having psychotic delusions. Or perhaps she got through law school despite being this irrational when confronted with law enforcement. It's like her frontal lobe just stopped working and she is processing information with her amygdala like a child would, with emotions not logic.
@@TheBasedTyrant yeah I wouldn’t hire her but she could have advised the minors of their rights and told them to remain silent. However she was a Moron like you said and really just made things worse.
She’s like a gnat, buzzing around irritating the officers, interfering with their investigation. You’ve been the Good Samaritan, now get out of the way and let them do their freakin job.
As a lawyer, this woman should have known better. If I was there, I would have asked for her business card just so I know what lawfirm not to call. If she was just an ordinary good Samaritan, I would have given her a D. But since she is a lawyer and should have known better, I give her an F. I give the officers a B for the same reasons you guys mentioned.
the good: this is one of my favorite UA-cam channels of all time. the bad: the audio has kind of a inside-of-a-submarine thing going on it's not super distracting but it is noticeable.
Tbh... I dont think I would have been so nice if I was a cop. She definetly probably would have had a law suite because the amount of anger that develops inside my brain as you realize that these people may have unknown injuries and this lady is not allowing those people to get help. When that adrenaline wears off, people can collapse for a variety of reasons. If the cops dont do their job then the insurance company will love to make sure to use that against paying for anything.
1:18 - This suspect is clearly a Caren-with-a-C, after ex-Port Authority Commissioner from Tenafly NJ, Caren Turner. • She’s clearly entitled; threw weight around that she didn’t have; disrespected the officers; disobeyed their commands; refused to own her mistakes…. I could go on.
This is exactly why most Americans don't like lawyers and this is to you two. The Policeman shouldn't have yelled at her. That's making excuses in my book.
I'm just super surprised that she actually is an attorney. I thought a real attorney would have more sense than to act like she did to get arrested. AND then resist arrest etc. If she was legit, I would've expected her to calmly thank the cops for wrongfully arresting her and giving her grounds for a lawsuit. All the attorneys I hace encountered say to be respectful, follow orders, and fight it in court. Not on the side of the road.
I'd like to point out that the video doesn't start at the beginning of the interaction and not once do you see the police do any assessment or question if anyone is ok.
@@amathy9690I will give you someone was eventually asked but this was after he was asked to move this car and after Claire got involved in calling his father because he was too confused to call himself.
This video better clarifies the bad attitude of these bad police officers, the video is made by someone who was already a police officer with many years of experience ua-cam.com/video/sZHua4ivq-M/v-deo.htmlsi=g3WEoHjmsOGf_NAx
He wish he was in the jury, but he doesn't believe the cops would/could/ has anything to charge at the same time... ( Funny wibe jury for two baby attorneys )
The cops were asking the kid with a head injury to get back in his car and drive it to move it. He could not dial the phone himself because he was impaired. This is why she was trying to help. Listen to the full unedited video to see the cops completely ignore what she was trying to tell them.
Her heart was in the right place but she conducted herself like a fool. She should have stated that she was hired by the legal guardian of the minor. Once that relationship is established then she would have legal standing to involve herself so aggressively. She did not however and left herself vulnerable to arrest. You have to be smart when dealing with law enforcement. They have the trump card with qualified immunity. Know your rights
You’re making up information that doesn’t exist. The only mention of a head injury came well after the fact via this Karen’s lawsuit. It’s interesting to note that ‘the kid’ involved in the accident doesn’t appear as a plaintiff in her lawsuit thereby further making your suppositions unlikely or irrelevant.
@@robertcahill9942 she can’t claim she was hired by the family when clearly she was not. She merely came upon the scene and thought she’d insert herself. Now she’s got charges to deal with, and rightly so.
Sorry, feel like your defending her too much. She was out of line, she had no business stopping, creating a more dangerous situation for everyone. The officers had just got to the scene and had to help everyone, assess the situation and call appropriate people needed. He asked the kid if he was okay ( the boy was standing there when he approached) and instructed him to sit down. She wanted to control the situation and thinks she is better than the cops. A minor can be arrested for crimes, as you know. If they rob, steal or commit murder, they do not need the parents to do so. I am not a cop, but I would have raised my voice too, when they were not doing what she wanted she got closer and keep waving the phone in his face and raising her voice.
I think that the officers are tired of the people like her that try to take over and try to make their jobs harder because they think they know better. These guys gave her plenty of warnings and she just would not back down. They are first and foremost only human and can not live up to these expectations we place on them of being 💯 professional 24/7, when dealing with people like her that like to throw their status at them and expect preferential treatment. Did you know that an officers life insurance is in a different bracket because their job is considered high risk and the stress they deal with leaves them open to a higher rate of divorce and suicide. So let’s give these guys a break. You can’t blame them for losing their patience when they know in the end they have to defend themselves and the Place they work for will probably just pay her off. Now that’s a moral buster. Nothing like being told you really didn’t do anything wrong but we are going to pay her and make her feel like you did.
If it happened as fast as this shows, I think he took it physical way to fast! Why didn't the officer answer her question? She had 2 questions. What if she was having anxiety from seeing the accident, calming the kid down and now the Dad might be having huge anxiety that she didn't tell anyone. Al he had to do was tell her I will let you know as soon as we know…but he just started yelling at her and then suddenly he went physical! I think it's wrong.
You can check the body camera timestamps to see how long it took them to go hands on. Less than 3 minutes from the start of the conversation to her on the ground. Definitely a short fuse even though she was being obnoxious
The video is too choppy and jumps around. I would have liked to have seen the body camera footage more fully. How things escalated would be important. How "jumbled" the kid is is also important, since it sounds like she was there first, maybe he did ask her to call his dad.
You are correct. She was there before the cops and witnessed the boy's confusion over how to use a cell phone. She assisted him by calling his father. When the police wanted him to move his car she told them about his head injury and confusion so they wouldn't put everyone in danger by making him drive in that condition.
“the civil rights attorney”…….the WV based one that has been repeatedly sanctioned by numerous state bar’s for violations of ethics, frivolous cases and is often dishonest about the outcomes of his cases? THAT clown?
Last year, my daughter got pulled over for speeding (40 in a 35) and called me while the officer was writing the ticket. That kid DEFINITELY contacted his father.
I am sorry, I don't see the same.. I pulled over was on the phone with the minors father i would of left his side intell I could give the father the right Imformation, the officer was escalating from the start not listening to anyone. She just wanted to get Imformation for the father. No Deescalating just yelling and use of force. If the officer was calm in his approach from the start. The woman was yelling because the hiway noise and way she was being treated.. But a jury of her peers will be the real judge in this case..
These people call themself REAL lawyers ???? Only thing real about them is they are bias and insensitive.. I like to see these Karen's caught up with a Titan cop....😂😂😂
Put yourself in the shoes of the parents of these young men, especially the one who seemed to have a head injury, and having trouble using his own phone to call his family. The first concern of these LEOs should've been the safety of these young men. Obviously, they were not competent enough to make a quick assessment of their condition especially if the LEO was instructing the impaired young man to operate his car and move it. The LEO's ego was so large, he had to be in charge, and he was not going to listen to anyone, no matter what. Granted they were still "trying to control the whole situation", Claire having gotten there first had already made a crucial observation. The young man had a head injury and was unable to use his phone. How much time does it take to consider what Claire was telling them? A few seconds! Then the LEO with the big ego would not have been instructing that kid with the head injury to move his car.
I never threw a resisting arrest charge on anyone. That is some new 22-year-old patrolman crybaby charge. What that really means is you hurt my feelings because you didn’t listen to me and you acted as any human being would do when a bunch of 210 pound men jump on 110 pound female. I’m really sick of police officers crying about resisting arrest that is such a broad term. Resisting arrest basically means is a police officer said you’re under arrest and because we are all pre-programmed with the fight or flight and you don’t just roll over and allow yourself to be bludgeoned like that poor girl who had her phone stolen from her by the abnormal police department Like seriously do you know anyone who is just going to be like yeah, go ahead and pull my arm up past my shoulder blade Oh, you want to slam me to the ground let me just lie down and count sheep What police officers should do first, but they don’t because they get butt hurt and that’s why they slam people, they should tell people that they are under arrest because this lady was not being violent. She wasn’t pulling a gun or a knife. She wasn’t attacking them they attacked her. But just tell someone you need to put your hands behind your back. I’m placing you under arrest and then tell them a couple of times because yes, people like to argue but if you let them know it’s having common decency. As police officers we are supposed to be better than other people we are held to a higher standard. We crushed that standard, when slam a 13-year-old to the ground and smash her head on a rock or break some ladies arm who has dementia They go from you need to leave to almost seriously injuring someone and I don’t understand why that needs to happen. I mean it doesn’t but you put a 24-year-old patrol officer who takes a bunch of testosterone every week it’s going to happen.
She knew one of the kids involved and called the father and who knows how the father was acting on the other side of the phone call. She was probably projecting the dad when she approached the officer for information.
My bet is she was hoping to get a job and it failed miserably. You're not going to win an argument and try to hold court on the side of a busy highway with an Officer period, full stop. She should have known better being an "Attorney". But, it seems she's not a very good one.
I hear where ya'll are coming from I think the original story was the lady was telling the officers the kid had a head injury. She was on scene before they were. The kid wasn't even able to dial the father without her assistance and her phone. The cops were then trying to make the kid drive and then this video ...
That’s all BS. There exists on UA-cam the entire BWC interaction. Look it up. You’re putting in information you couldn’t possibly know to fill your mind voids, therefore your conclusions are moot.
Sorry that last bit was meant for the David Shuster video. Here’s a link to that one where he erroneously claims that the attorney knew the kid/father m.ua-cam.com/video/OmiI6LQoZGI/v-deo.html
It's difficult to asses the police performance without seeing the full video. Perhaps there had been many, many unsuccessful attempts to deescalate the situation before the arrest.
As long as this matter is considered, she is a person involved in the scene . Not escalating the situation is the job of the cop. (As he says short fuse )
She inserted herself and escalated a situation that was under control. Disgusting ….she is so entitled that she put everyone at the scene in danger as well as cars passing by ON A HIGHWAY. How would she like it if a cop showed up at one of her court hearings and tried to tell her what to do?
This is the problem with the legal system …two “lawyers” who don’t know that “interference” is a physical act….whether we agree, or not, mere words don’t meet the standard and there are countless court cases that came to the same conclusion - this is why people end up pleading guilty to non-crimes
Your comment might make sense if she was charged with “interference.” But she wasn’t. She was charged with “obstruction” and “disorderly conduct.” Go look those up and reply back.
@@driverdefenseteam disorderly doesn’t fly, cops can’t be the aggrieved victim and it doesn’t matter if it’s called obstruction or interference, there is a ton of case law with rulings that found that obstruction, or interference, has to be a physical act …if they want to claim she physically got in the way then that as one thing, and maybe she did, but the video doesn’t show it - whether I agree is another issue, but every case I’ve read found that First Amendment protections block the police from being the aggrieved party for disorderly conduct since we have the right to redress out govt officials and the same applies to “interference or obstruction” laws from the standpoint there used here
The polices are too self important and seem not to want to listen what happened and contact teenager's parents.... Poor handling will result in a future society with increasingly fewer bystanders willing to help others.
The gloaters look disturbing. The two hosts seem to have one man of Indian descent and one woman of Mexican descent? How would you guys react if you also encountered such treatment by police personnel? It is clear in the original video that more experienced police officers have already stated that the innocent lady in the video should be released. As for the rest of you, defending the police is your favorite isn't it? Is it in your nature to go to extremes like diodes? Do you have to hate all white people who do what is right and help others?
Honestly I side with the "Karen". She was there before the officers arrived and provided aid. They wanted a boy with a possible head injury to drive his car. All she wanted to know is which hospital he was going to be taken to, not for herself but for the father.
@@FatherofheroesandheroinesI disagree. She didn't attack. She never touched them. She only asked for some information for the father and to just talk to the father.
This video didn't show that much but they wasn't going to have the kid move it, if I remember right one of them was going to. As they stated she's going to be one of the last people a cop will talk to. They want to get what happened from each driver first as well as clear the road then get her statement. Also as they said the EMS is going to be the ones that decide if the kid need to go to the hospital or not and which one. The cops are not going to know any of that because it's not there feild of expertise.
I remember seeing this full video. They were definitely demanding the kid move it. Cops will rarely move someone else's car. And side note as high pitched as she sounds and I would likely believe she was in the wrong. The fuller video really does paint a very different picture of this incident. The cops were out of line in this. They escalated before this video started. The full one was different.@@kirklund962
Police acting like brutal tyrants. I hope she wins in court. A few lazy numb skulls here asking people to post the video explaining her "bad behavior". I've watched a few of them. Do your own research before talking from both sides of your mouth.
I'm glad y'all covered this
"Saul Goodman: Don't say anything!!!"
😂😂
I was once in a position like the lawyer where I witnessed an accident. Except it was a older man who just drove off the road and I just parked and asked him if he was okay and told him I would call 911. Fortunately I went to Warren the next car that was coming to slow down on the curve in the road and it was a State trooper. A briefed the trooper on what just happened and went on my way. The lady in the video should learn sometimes less is more. I just wonder what kind of law school she went to.
She isn't just a good Samaritan. She knew him. How did they think she knew he was a minor and how did she know the father's phone number? In the full video, she says she's a family friend. I understand why she was trying to help their friend.
Once AGAIN they don't play the FULL video. Her only problem was how she handled it. The cops didn't handle it right either.
The Halls Attorney has filled a motion to withdraw as the Halls Attorney on October 19th.
Not surprised. Do you have a link to this information?
She's a handful
She’s annoying af and I don’t blame them for taking her down. She’s trying to tell him how things are gonna happen,
they don’t even know yet. And for her to say he’s “beating the sh!t” out of her shows she rarely faces adversity. If any domestic abuse victim saw this, they would never choose her to defend them. Smh. Sit in your damn car and watch them and get in for for the father when you can. Dont act like you have authority over any police officers there.
Great stuff for “ Karen-the-alleged-roadside-attorney gets butt hurt and looks for a payday! The screaming banshee just can’t believe that cops are underwhelmed with her alleged profession. As I said on another’s rendering of this video “David Shuster” who claimed this woman knew the kid and or father, she not only put everyone on scene at further risk on a busy highway, but even herself as she resisted arrest and pulled away from police. It wouldn’t be the first time a UA-cam video depicted someone who resisted and ran into traffic and got killed as a result. Thanks for the critique, it’s most welcome & realistic.
You guys always leave me wishing I could have a beer w/ y'all. I bet you guys have a great time in your office!
Every time! Especially when they used to have that sassy intro. It was like “I’m sure you’re tell us where we went wrong in the comments” 😂😂😂
Love this channel! Great information, entertaining, great chemistry between you two. This channel is going to skyrocket!
8:20The phone could clarify many questions that the officer asked this young man and avoid unnecessary confusion. That is what every good police officer should know after encountering someone who suffered a brain trauma.
Listen to what she claims in her lawsuit. This woman is pathetic!
“In the lawsuit Hall filed on Aug. 31, she alleges that she suffered injuries to her shoulders, teeth, breasts and bladder, along with “psychological damage, emotional distress, embarrassment, humiliation and loss of bodily functions” when she was “assaulted, restrained, forcefully thrown to the ground, and had a knee placed on her body before she was handcuffed.”
Loss of bodily function. You can’t make this up
Narcissists seek attention no matter the situation. If the accident had been more serious, she'd have done the same thing as the victims bled out. The fact that it's negative attention is meaningless. She makes herself the center to boost her ego, and when all you have is a grandiose delusional ego, it must be boosted at all cost in the face of reality. It's a never ending, exhausting compulsion.
👍👍
Seems so. The way she was acting was crazy, but she had the idea to help(even if potentially selfish reasons). To me there is no innocent side here other than the kid, however the most guilty still by far is the lawyer woman. Kid wasnt even detained or arrested, she just made it 100x worse though
The worst part is she filled the lawsuit before she got out of the charges. If the charges stick then that makes the lawsuit soooo much harder. Not a very smart or good lawyer if you ask me.
She probably a real estate lawyer.
she has no experience in traffic or criminal law. Entitled Karen.
I’ve pulled over to be a Good Samaritan and once in an almost identical situation. The cops seemed appreciative that I and another woman stopped to help and take care of calling parents and comforting the teen so they could do whatever nonsense they do. That lady seemed a little… *much*. No need for stepping in the middle of something so aggressively. If outside help is needed, it’ll be obvious
I happened to stumble upon this video in my recommended list & I’m thrilled that I clicked on it!! Had a blast listening to y’all joke w some sass, wit & sarcasm yet at the same time gave us some good factual info too ❤❤
Some of the best personalities on UA-cam! Love the Driver Defense Team!
She’s self-important & clueless! Oh, an Attorney! No surprise there!
4:31 - Calling Claire Hall a bitch would be disrespectful to real bitches aka the good girl dogs who are full of love and joy if you keep ‘em fed, sheltered, and loved; but she is a charlie-uniform-november-tango of an individual for obstructing the traffic stop and resisting arrest.
•
She been told. Now look at her.
She needs to get over herself
I think the officers get an A. Mainly because she was demanding and it was clear that she wasn't going to budge on the pedestal she she standing on. This isn't a situation that demanded the amount of push back she was giving.
I might be taking back my comment. If this starts from first contact. It took a minute and a half from first contact to them putting hands on her. Do I still think she may be a Karen...yes. However the LEOs could've have handled this much better. When she mentioned a hospital the question should've been, why do you think he needs medical attention. I now think the officers reacted too quickly
@ggatzjr4755 the priority was clear the highway to stop another accident, they done the right thing
According to a different video, one of the teens had suffered a minor head injury, and was having trouble working his own cell phone to call his dad. That is why the lady had inserted herself to be the mouthpiece for that kid and use his phone.
Sure, but the cops don't know that. To them some random lady with a random guy on their phone is asking questions about a minor, including medical information, at an accident scene that they're still trying to get under control
@@tsmcgu she was definitely annoying, but the other video was much longer and included more information than what was seen here. I do think the cop was aware of the head injury because they didn’t allow him to move the car out of the road because of it.
Provide a link to this mysterious video that exonerates this Karen then. If it’s a video of yet another ‘guess’ trying to understand this Karen’s puzzling roadside court appearance, then I’ll expect to hear more excuses for Karen’s bad behaviour from you without the video you claim to have seen. Or you’ll pretend you didn’t read this post and say nothing.
@@AndyJayroe The minor's condition is immaterial to what the woman is doing. He's a minor, he's the cops responsibility, they can't release him or his information to some person they (and the minor) don't know. She wanted to help. Great. She helped. The kid is with professionals now who can take care of him. Give your information and walk away, or at the very least step back and let them do their job
She doesn't have a right to be this kids representative though. She doesn't have a right to demand information about the kid. If she wants to let the officers know the kid is concussed and needs medical attention and pass the phone over, awesome. Shouting "WHAT AM I SUPPOSED TO TELL THE DAD THEN??!?!?!" Is like "idc lady, tell him whatever you want, let me do my job."
The officers get a A and she is repeating the whole grade and will have sanctions against her!
I cant wait for these guys to find Fridays with Frank videos, for the sake if some levity
I honestly hope this channel blows up! You guys are so good on these videos. I've watched them all. Informative & Hilarious.
I hope this also makes your business boom. Use genuinely deserve it.
Keep posting 👍
Cars, trucks barreling down at 80,90 mph. These police officers need to secure the highway NOW. No time to argue with some deranged 'good samaritan' attorney.
I agree with both of you on this one.
I agree with most of what you said but I don’t think she was trying to get with the kid, she sniffed out a lawsuit.
She should be disbarred for putting everybody’s lives at risk including her own by arguing with police officer at a traffic investigation around fast moving traffic. Also, I think she’s trying to help that young good looking boy so he’ll befriend her and give her some. That’s not a good Samaritan, I think she’s trying to groom her next victim.
If she's an attorney and she was supposed to represent me, I think I speak for plenty of people when I say I'd either fire her to get a different attorney or choose to represent myself. If this is how she acts outside of a courtroom I'd imagine her screaming inside a courtroom and how uncomfortable it'd make everyone feel. It sounds like a good defense strategy to make a jury want to be done with hearing her or seeing her but when it'd be my butt on the line, I don't think so.
this lady does not go to court. She is not a criminal law attorney or civil law attorney. She's a glorified paper pusher.
"A Fool for a Client." She's just a plain old FOOL!
She's not even a defense attorney. She's a consultant with a J.D.!
She didn't witness it. She drove up on it and her attorney kicked in.
BIG fan of, and much respect for, Derek & Kelly! With seemingly infinite channels of police bodycam vids, this is the only channel providing truly informed & entertaining commentary with law-based practicality. THANK YOU!!! I watch every DDTeam vid b/c this channel often feels like the only safe haven of sanity, fairness, & rational (informed) thought. Again, THANK YOU!
I googled this 'lawyer' out of curiosity about what others, especially in RI, are saying. After 5 min of reading commentary on social media, I had to watch 3 past DDTeam vids to calm down. ~80% of the commentary (I know, I know--not representative of reality, or is it?) on Twitter & UA-cam say the officers are in the wrong b/c they had a duty to deescalate the situation, & the dept failed in not training these officers properly.....................
Please tell me if I'm wrong, but the officers' DUTY was (1) to the HEALTH & SAFETY of the driver (who was reported to have sustained leg, and potentially serious head injuries), and anyone on the highway - standing, pacing, exhibiting irrationality; and (2) investigating, upholding, & enforcing THE LAW. Scientific research (which I am educated, informed, & experienced) supports the theory that law enforcement would likely be more efficient in carrying out these duties (1) & (2) by manipulating the "mirroring effect" (when communicating, especially 1-on-1, both individuals are likely to consciously or subconsciously 'mirror' the other in thought process, emotion, behavior, or some combination of the three).
But, customer service & restorative therapy are NOT police DUTIES. The 2 are likely to be 'Best Practices,' or ideal methods, but if law enforcement can't fulfill their actual duties, then legally detaining/arresting is what has to happen. Or am I wrong? This woman's behavior was escalating in a way that prevented at least 1 officer (at least 2, according to her own lawsuit) from investigating, upholding, or enforcing, and had already posed a specific threat to at least 3 people's H&S (not including any motorist).
WHY? Again, correct me if I'm wrong...She KNOWS that she is right. About everything. And everyone. Everywhere. All the time. It's an unfortunately pervasive perspective. Research is being done across the country studying the effects of the Covid lockdown, specifically the need to be confident that I/ME is/am more right/informed/smarter than anyone, including the most experienced professionals in that area, even with no reasonable justification. 'I was never told my rights, so you can't arrest me;' 'I can't be arrested if I don't agree with anything the officer says,' 'I say I'm a SovCit, so no laws apply to me,' 'It's against the law for police to be rude, or anything I say is rude or against the law,' 'I have to hear AND acknowledge AND receive paperwork stating the words "FINAL WARNING" before I can be arrested." Translate any of the above to any profession, and just the thought drives me to play All the DDTeam videos on a loop 24 hrs a day.
I can't remember the first vid that Derek and Kelly said, "...regardless, just do what the officers tell you to do, and let us go to court and deal with the problem there. You can't solve a problem, but you CAN make it so much worse." Why is it so hard for so many people to listen to the professionals (multiple, not singular)?
I don't think the cop was actually too quick because she was identifying herself as a lawyer. If she's really a lawyer who actually understands the laws pertaining to this situation then the cops shouldn't have to explain them to her.
How would you feel if your son got hit by a car because the officers were having to deal with this lunatic?
The husband is probably the one suing for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress because of having to hear her go on and on about what a victim she is.
Actually, he probably does deserve some money! LOL!
Happy to see Kelly doing the intro!
The actions of a good samaritan are only allowed and necessary until the arrival of personnel with higher qualifications to handle the emergency situation, medical or public safety. When the police arrived they automatically assumed the responsibility of taking care of the situation, assesding the medical needs of any victims and ensuring the safety of motorists and pedestrians in the accident scene area. Her presence and actions were a willful hindrance to the cops in trying to do their jobs.
Every second you’re on the side of the highway, you risk being hit by a driver. Cops are 100% right.
She has no work in her field seriously.
I've been watching police pullovers of intoxicated drivers and those crazy drunk women! This attorney looked just like those screaming drunks!
Self righteous behavior who thinks she is in charge of every situation.
I like the reading the comments idea
Omg the imitation of her with the phone 😂😂
Don't the cops know.... She pays their salary!🤣🤣😎
She thought because shes a lawyer and so is her husband that she's entitled to be there and they are beneath her.
I haven't been this early since 2020! Karens think they own the road..apparently even lawyer Karens!
Attorneys always tell their clients not to argue w police on the roadside & wait for court. This lady however ignored all good advice from other lawyers and argues w police on the roadside in something she admits she wasn’t even involved in.
Lawyers argue that’s their job. Her mistake was not having the legal guardian of the minor hire her as their attorney. Had she done that then she’d have much more legal standing to be involved. But she’s an idiot so she was carted off like a suitcase q
@@robertcahill9942She probably would have been allowed to stay but honestly that kid would have been better off by himself, the police don't have to let you speak to your lawyer until after you have been processed anyway, the most she could have learned is where he would be going but he could have just told that to his dad over the phone himself.
It's hard to say what would make a lawyer come across as this ignorant of what to do in this situation, it honestly looks like she may be having psychotic delusions. Or perhaps she got through law school despite being this irrational when confronted with law enforcement. It's like her frontal lobe just stopped working and she is processing information with her amygdala like a child would, with emotions not logic.
@@TheBasedTyrant yeah I wouldn’t hire her but she could have advised the minors of their rights and told them to remain silent. However she was a Moron like you said and really just made things worse.
She’s like a gnat, buzzing around irritating the officers, interfering with their investigation. You’ve been the Good Samaritan, now get out of the way and let them do their freakin job.
As a lawyer, this woman should have known better. If I was there, I would have asked for her business card just so I know what lawfirm not to call. If she was just an ordinary good Samaritan, I would have given her a D. But since she is a lawyer and should have known better, I give her an F. I give the officers a B for the same reasons you guys mentioned.
the good: this is one of my favorite UA-cam channels of all time. the bad: the audio has kind of a inside-of-a-submarine thing going on it's not super distracting but it is noticeable.
The audio sounds perfectly fine to me.
Once they get more subs they will likely invest in a better soundproof room.
Tbh... I dont think I would have been so nice if I was a cop. She definetly probably would have had a law suite because the amount of anger that develops inside my brain as you realize that these people may have unknown injuries and this lady is not allowing those people to get help. When that adrenaline wears off, people can collapse for a variety of reasons. If the cops dont do their job then the insurance company will love to make sure to use that against paying for anything.
A good Samaritan would have helped quietly, not scream to the point of an obstruction charge. Maybe she should do some FSTs lol
She has no ears and think the cops dont arrest lawyers and judges. Disgrace despicable mind your own business Claire Hall
5 mile rule applies to lawyers too. Stay 5 miles away from leos at all time.
1:18 - This suspect is clearly a Caren-with-a-C, after ex-Port Authority Commissioner from Tenafly NJ, Caren Turner.
•
She’s clearly entitled; threw weight around that she didn’t have; disrespected the officers; disobeyed their commands; refused to own her mistakes…. I could go on.
Fabrication of injuries she's not making money at all
This is exactly why most Americans don't like lawyers and this is to you two.
The Policeman shouldn't have yelled at her.
That's making excuses in my book.
Only one officer was wearing a body camera, the first officer on scene was not wearing one, and she was first on scene.
Rule of thumb even if they didn't do anything wrong you have to convict anyone named Karen
I'm just super surprised that she actually is an attorney. I thought a real attorney would have more sense than to act like she did to get arrested. AND then resist arrest etc. If she was legit, I would've expected her to calmly thank the cops for wrongfully arresting her and giving her grounds for a lawsuit. All the attorneys I hace encountered say to be respectful, follow orders, and fight it in court. Not on the side of the road.
I'd like to point out that the video doesn't start at the beginning of the interaction and not once do you see the police do any assessment or question if anyone is ok.
Yeah I would have like to have seen the whole video. That was my one big caveat.
Literally one of the first questions I heard the officer ask is if the kid is okay.
@@amathy9690 what's the time index?
@@hawhite2000 3:16
@@amathy9690I will give you someone was eventually asked but this was after he was asked to move this car and after Claire got involved in calling his father because he was too confused to call himself.
She was making it dangerous for the people involved in the accident as well as the police officers.
This video better clarifies the bad attitude of these bad police officers, the video is made by someone who was already a police officer with many years of experience ua-cam.com/video/sZHua4ivq-M/v-deo.htmlsi=g3WEoHjmsOGf_NAx
He wish he was in the jury, but he doesn't believe the cops would/could/ has anything to charge at the same time...
( Funny wibe jury for two baby attorneys )
The cops were asking the kid with a head injury to get back in his car and drive it to move it. He could not dial the phone himself because he was impaired. This is why she was trying to help. Listen to the full unedited video to see the cops completely ignore what she was trying to tell them.
Her heart was in the right place but she conducted herself like a fool. She should have stated that she was hired by the legal guardian of the minor. Once that relationship is established then she would have legal standing to involve herself so aggressively. She did not however and left herself vulnerable to arrest. You have to be smart when dealing with law enforcement. They have the trump card with qualified immunity. Know your rights
You’re making up information that doesn’t exist. The only mention of a head injury came well after the fact via this Karen’s lawsuit. It’s interesting to note that ‘the kid’ involved in the accident doesn’t appear as a plaintiff in her lawsuit thereby further making your suppositions unlikely or irrelevant.
@@robertcahill9942 she can’t claim she was hired by the family when clearly she was not. She merely came upon the scene and thought she’d insert herself. Now she’s got charges to deal with, and rightly so.
Sorry, feel like your defending her too much. She was out of line, she had no business stopping, creating a more dangerous situation for everyone. The officers had just got to the scene and had to help everyone, assess the situation and call appropriate people needed. He asked the kid if he was okay ( the boy was standing there when he approached) and instructed him to sit down. She wanted to control the situation and thinks she is better than the cops. A minor can be arrested for crimes, as you know. If they rob, steal or commit murder, they do not need the parents to do so. I am not a cop, but I would have raised my voice too, when they were not doing what she wanted she got closer and keep waving the phone in his face and raising her voice.
@@MarkJones-n she absolutely could she was talking to one of the kids guardians. They can hire her on the spot. Then she has legal standing.
didn't know ralph macchio had a youtube channel
😂😂
I think that the officers are tired of the people like her that try to take over and try to make their jobs harder because they think they know better. These guys gave her plenty of warnings and she just would not back down. They are first and foremost only human and can not live up to these expectations we place on them of being 💯 professional 24/7, when dealing with people like her that like to throw their status at them and expect preferential treatment. Did you know that an officers life insurance is in a different bracket because their job is considered high risk and the stress they deal with leaves them open to a higher rate of divorce and suicide. So let’s give these guys a break. You can’t blame them for losing their patience when they know in the end they have to defend themselves and the Place they work for will probably just pay her off. Now that’s a moral buster. Nothing like being told you really didn’t do anything wrong but we are going to pay her and make her feel like you did.
Thanks Kelly! Whose that other guy with you? ;-P
get lost lady
Why are the body cameras videos so blurry?
It was only blurry at first.
If it happened as fast as this shows, I think he took it physical way to fast! Why didn't the officer answer her question? She had 2 questions. What if she was having anxiety from seeing the accident, calming the kid down and now the Dad might be having huge anxiety that she didn't tell anyone. Al he had to do was tell her I will let you know as soon as we know…but he just started yelling at her and then suddenly he went physical! I think it's wrong.
Please keep going, it takes a while to get subs, but you will catch the algorithm godz soon. 🎉❤
She should have ñever shopped
You can check the body camera timestamps to see how long it took them to go hands on. Less than 3 minutes from the start of the conversation to her on the ground. Definitely a short fuse even though she was being obnoxious
The video is too choppy and jumps around. I would have liked to have seen the body camera footage more fully.
How things escalated would be important. How "jumbled" the kid is is also important, since it sounds like she was there first, maybe he did ask her to call his dad.
You are correct. She was there before the cops and witnessed the boy's confusion over how to use a cell phone. She assisted him by calling his father. When the police wanted him to move his car she told them about his head injury and confusion so they wouldn't put everyone in danger by making him drive in that condition.
I don't know. For cops that were sooo concerned with clearing the road way. This resulted in the roadway being blocked for far longer 🤣
Watched this on Civil Rights Attorney channel and I’m still wondering when 12 years olds were allowed to be cops
“the civil rights attorney”…….the WV based one that has been repeatedly sanctioned by numerous state bar’s for violations of ethics, frivolous cases and is often dishonest about the outcomes of his cases?
THAT clown?
Last year, my daughter got pulled over for speeding (40 in a 35) and called me while the officer was writing the ticket. That kid DEFINITELY contacted his father.
wrong! it was her phone...she called. she was awful
It is getting easier and easier to spot progressive liberals.
Two people can definitely be wrong, the attorney was definitely in the wrong here but the officers certainly went hands on pretty quick.
She could have offered to represent someone on the scene, pro bono, right?
Its not against the law to be annoying. She has a right to talk. He's being an ass.
Her all-self-important ego told her stop.
I am sorry, I don't see the same.. I pulled over was on the phone with the minors father i would of left his side intell I could give the father the right Imformation, the officer was escalating from the start not listening to anyone. She just wanted to get Imformation for the father. No Deescalating just yelling and use of force. If the officer was calm in his approach from the start. The woman was yelling because the hiway noise and way she was being treated..
But a jury of her peers will be the real judge in this case..
These people call themself REAL lawyers ????
Only thing real about them is they are bias and insensitive..
I like to see these Karen's caught up with a Titan cop....😂😂😂
Put yourself in the shoes of the parents of these young men, especially the one who seemed to have a head injury, and having trouble using his own phone to call his family. The first concern of these LEOs should've been the safety of these young men. Obviously, they were not competent enough to make a quick assessment of their condition especially if the LEO was instructing the impaired young man to operate his car and move it. The LEO's ego was so large, he had to be in charge, and he was not going to listen to anyone, no matter what. Granted they were still "trying to control the whole situation", Claire having gotten there first had already made a crucial observation. The young man had a head injury and was unable to use his phone. How much time does it take to consider what Claire was telling them? A few seconds! Then the LEO with the big ego would not have been instructing that kid with the head injury to move his car.
you guys sound like you want to be distric attorneys so bad. Wouldn't hire you as a defense attorney 😂
I never threw a resisting arrest charge on anyone. That is some new 22-year-old patrolman crybaby charge. What that really means is you hurt my feelings because you didn’t listen to me and you acted as any human being would do when a bunch of 210 pound men jump on 110 pound female.
I’m really sick of police officers crying about resisting arrest that is such a broad term. Resisting arrest basically means is a police officer said you’re under arrest and because we are all pre-programmed with the fight or flight and you don’t just roll over and allow yourself to be bludgeoned like that poor girl who had her phone stolen from her by the abnormal police department
Like seriously do you know anyone who is just going to be like yeah, go ahead and pull my arm up past my shoulder blade
Oh, you want to slam me to the ground let me just lie down and count sheep
What police officers should do first, but they don’t because they get butt hurt and that’s why they slam people, they should tell people that they are under arrest because this lady was not being violent. She wasn’t pulling a gun or a knife. She wasn’t attacking them they attacked her.
But just tell someone you need to put your hands behind your back. I’m placing you under arrest and then tell them a couple of times because yes, people like to argue but if you let them know it’s having common decency. As police officers we are supposed to be better than other people we are held to a higher standard.
We crushed that standard, when slam a 13-year-old to the ground and smash her head on a rock or break some ladies arm who has dementia
They go from you need to leave to almost seriously injuring someone and I don’t understand why that needs to happen. I mean it doesn’t but you put a 24-year-old patrol officer who takes a bunch of testosterone every week it’s going to happen.
She knew one of the kids involved and called the father and who knows how the father was acting on the other side of the phone call. She was probably projecting the dad when she approached the officer for information.
My bet is she was hoping to get a job and it failed miserably. You're not going to win an argument and try to hold court on the side of a busy highway with an Officer period, full stop. She should have known better being an "Attorney". But, it seems she's not a very good one.
I hear where ya'll are coming from I think the original story was the lady was telling the officers the kid had a head injury. She was on scene before they were. The kid wasn't even able to dial the father without her assistance and her phone. The cops were then trying to make the kid drive and then this video ...
That’s all BS. There exists on UA-cam the entire BWC interaction. Look it up. You’re putting in information you couldn’t possibly know to fill your mind voids, therefore your conclusions are moot.
@@MarkJones-n I heard the same thing from another channel. Can you link to the original video?
@@MarkJones-n I actually did see the whole BWC, she was on the scene before they were.
@@Immortan_Bob obviously.
Sorry that last bit was meant for the David Shuster video. Here’s a link to that one where he erroneously claims that the attorney knew the kid/father
m.ua-cam.com/video/OmiI6LQoZGI/v-deo.html
It's difficult to asses the police performance without seeing the full video. Perhaps there had been many, many unsuccessful attempts to deescalate the situation before the arrest.
As long as this matter is considered, she is a person involved in the scene .
Not escalating the situation is the job of the cop. (As he says short fuse )
She inserted herself and escalated a situation that was under control. Disgusting ….she is so entitled that she put everyone at the scene in danger as well as cars passing by ON A HIGHWAY. How would she like it if a cop showed up at one of her court hearings and tried to tell her what to do?
This is the problem with the legal system …two “lawyers” who don’t know that “interference” is a physical act….whether we agree, or not, mere words don’t meet the standard and there are countless court cases that came to the same conclusion - this is why people end up pleading guilty to non-crimes
Your comment might make sense if she was charged with “interference.” But she wasn’t. She was charged with “obstruction” and “disorderly conduct.”
Go look those up and reply back.
@@driverdefenseteam disorderly doesn’t fly, cops can’t be the aggrieved victim and it doesn’t matter if it’s called obstruction or interference, there is a ton of case law with rulings that found that obstruction, or interference, has to be a physical act …if they want to claim she physically got in the way then that as one thing, and maybe she did, but the video doesn’t show it - whether I agree is another issue, but every case I’ve read found that First Amendment protections block the police from being the aggrieved party for disorderly conduct since we have the right to redress out govt officials and the same applies to “interference or obstruction” laws from the standpoint there used here
You guys love the taste of boots?
The polices are too self important and seem not to want to listen what happened and contact teenager's parents.... Poor handling will result in a future society with increasingly fewer bystanders willing to help others.
The gloaters look disturbing.
The two hosts seem to have one man of Indian descent and one woman of Mexican descent? How would you guys react if you also encountered such treatment by police personnel?
It is clear in the original video that more experienced police officers have already stated that the innocent lady in the video should be released.
As for the rest of you, defending the police is your favorite isn't it?
Is it in your nature to go to extremes like diodes?
Do you have to hate all white people who do what is right and help others?
Honestly I side with the "Karen". She was there before the officers arrived and provided aid. They wanted a boy with a possible head injury to drive his car. All she wanted to know is which hospital he was going to be taken to, not for herself but for the father.
No that's not what's happening here. She attacked like a barracuda for no reason. Please watch the video again.
@@FatherofheroesandheroinesI disagree. She didn't attack. She never touched them. She only asked for some information for the father and to just talk to the father.
This video didn't show that much but they wasn't going to have the kid move it, if I remember right one of them was going to. As they stated she's going to be one of the last people a cop will talk to. They want to get what happened from each driver first as well as clear the road then get her statement. Also as they said the EMS is going to be the ones that decide if the kid need to go to the hospital or not and which one. The cops are not going to know any of that because it's not there feild of expertise.
I remember seeing this full video. They were definitely demanding the kid move it. Cops will rarely move someone else's car. And side note as high pitched as she sounds and I would likely believe she was in the wrong. The fuller video really does paint a very different picture of this incident. The cops were out of line in this. They escalated before this video started. The full one was different.@@kirklund962
Bullshit.
Ridiculous use of excessive force.
Police acting like brutal tyrants. I hope she wins in court. A few lazy numb skulls here asking people to post the video explaining her "bad behavior". I've watched a few of them. Do your own research before talking from both sides of your mouth.