And in another universe Simon takes over every UA-cam channel and run the Monopoly on UA-cam and is a billionaire and found a way to upload his conscience into a cybernetic body and has became immortal running UA-cam for all times for his minions
in one other universe Simon has very long hair on his head and is shaved…. imagine that weird universe… pigs fly probably in it and cows give chocolate milk and we are all slaves of the crab people also his last name is Shouter, Simon Shouter… also hes a communist and likes Lord of the Rings lets call the long haired and shaved Simon the evil Simon Shouter…
I love how Simon can get savage at times, but also not take himself too serious. Also, his reactions to some of the script given him. Love all of your content, man. Always feel like I get entertained and learn something. Win win.
There is a multiverse where Simon has hair and let Danny out of the basement? No...statistically that's still as much of a likelihood as the Scarlett Johansson chance.
It is my estimation that if a traversable infinite multiverse did exist, we wouldn't have to worry about it, because in at least one of them, some horrible despot would have already crossed through to all the other multiverses and destroyed them so his could be the only one.
Very interesting video. I love all of your channels. It’s not often that you someone can both entertain and educate.. you do both perfectly! Well done Simon and team 😊👏🏻💯🙌🏻
although I want to believe in a multiverse, when does a dream become just a dream, one could argue that fiction and science fiction are portals to other dimensions and multiverses, but aren't they just dreams. but then again we don't understand the brain enough to discount that if we can dream it, it may exist somewhere.
This channel is wild I like it, since BB got it’s nuts chopped off this is my new real blaze zone 😂. The OG BB is just like a podcast now and Simon sits down and just reads not true blazing
Simon, I hope you see this. You’re my favorite UA-cam personality. I know you work lots of channels but you are just so enjoyable to watch on all of them.
what about a serial multiverse? What I mean is, what if there is only 1 universe at a time, but it is alternating - there is a big bang, the universe expands but starts to slow down until gravity pulls it all back into a a single point which then explodes into a new big bang which creates a new universe that might be different from the last one.
In the multiverse who is me? Or nature vs nurture? The closest one might expect is, of course, identical twins, but even with the same inherited trait and learned behaviors, they are still different. Thus should a me, from a different universe, is not me, but is more, a weird identical twin?
I think the sensation of Deja Vu is caused by the brief synchronization in time of an action performed by an individual and their alternate self from another universe
There may never be a way to prove if other universes exist, but the best clues may be in Quantum Mechanics. I have always believed in the Infinite Earths Theory even before I know a name for it as I believe that every discission branches to a different reality and all of these happen simultaneously. I am also sure there is an Earth that is still ruled by dinosaurs because Earth was never hit by an asteroid that devastated life. I also believe there is a universe where Simon and Scarlett are in an alley sharing a needle.
Here, animated Simon runs from the one eyed tentacle monster, in another he's married to it, and in a third he is the tentacle monster, sharing a needle with Scarlett Johansen.
Ahhh the age old rivalry between science and philosophy, or as I call it: the battle between Eggheads and Thinkers. Also, I could *realllllly* start a flame-war on this with...other topics...but I’m not in the mood today.
13:00 a big smile slowly creeps across my face as Simon begins to reacquaint us all with paradigm shifts in science. The one that's coming is a big'n !:-)
3:20 - Chapter 1 - 4 levels of multiverse 3:45 - 1st level 6:00 - 2nd level 6:55 - 3rd level 9:05 - 4th level 9:55 - Chapter 2 - Why does anyone believe this ? 12:35 - Chapter 3 - Doing science backwards 14:40 - Chapter 4 - Dangerous for science ? 17:10 - Wrap up PS: Knowing the Whistlerverse and the many personas Simon employs, i can definitively affirm that it exists
So what you're saying, is that somewhere out there, I have just uploaded this video to UA-cam. While Simon watches it after a line of "battle powder" while being locked in Danny's basement?
It is a bit presumptuous to talk about multiverse as basically a belief system because lack of experimentation but string theory is in a similar situation. Just has pretty math to justify its belief. Which really just a pretty idea.
Sometimes i watch and then i will think "but what about THIS theory?"... and then I remember I'm watching a fun science channel, and not one of the field specific physics lectures I watch lol. But god do I miss Star Trek's dedication to putting in real effort when it came to the science. The new stuff hurts my fucking soul. It isn't the only part of the older trek series that they left behind, but it feels so empty without.
If you want an interesting multiverse show there is an old 90's one called Sliders where they go to a different multiverse in almost every eppisode. I don't know if any of the streaming services is showing it though.
Another thing that a multiverse could allow is Faster than Light travel without the risk of causing causal loops (aka paradoxes), because if you travelled back in time and altered the timeline the alteration would merely be swallowed by another universe, instead of making the main one inconsistent.
Yet, you're making a comment. You've engaged in a pointless endeavor! This will send anti-matter particles across the multiverse, in a butterfly-effect manner, that no living astral physicist can even comprehend! (Which, as a multi-dimensional being, I'm totally down with.)
I would love to see a piece on the Three Laws of Robotics, Asimov "rules". Mainly because they keep getting brought up after the robot broke that kid's finger in a chess match, as if they are actual "laws", not something created by a science fiction writer as a basis for many of his books and stories.
It's a nice idea, but even in Asimov's work it only applied to sapient robots that think for themselves as opposed to just running through a programmed tree of options, a built-in safety to prevent the things shown in Terminator and The Matrix and Westworld &c. Current robots, it's on the human writing the code.
Ah, but sapient robots or androids- what if they began writing their own code? Robots improving their own AI, using pure logic, with no human unput? Would they still follow Asimov's Three Laws (which are flawed, as it is)? Or would they ditch them and create their own laws? Would we have Data or T-800?
@@striker8961 This video shows it- the chess playing robot grabbed a 7-year old kid's finger while they were playing chess. Broke the kid's finger: ua-cam.com/video/fixQWq3HNZg/v-deo.html
The multiverse concept is fascinating. The Mandela Effect, the people who lost their minds when they fired up the Hadron at Cern....thanks for the script Kevin, great writing as usual!!! Im a big sci fi and fantasy fiction fan, the "hard science" theories are a bit harder for my small brain are fascinating but mind bending, but the more fantasy rewrites of history are just plain fun sometimes, like the Whatif Machine in Futurama, or an "alternate history" series...
FWIW, It doesn't have anything to do with the Mandela effect; there is no way to end up in the "wrong" universe, there is no way one could possibly know which universe one's in, and the number of total universes is beyond anything we could possibly comprehend. To be clear: A given universe "splits" every time there is a quantum event (any interaction between subatomic particles, including a measurement). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Event_(particle_physics) I don't think Simon gave it a fair shake. Does it really make any more sense to propose that a given subatomic particle doesn't have an actual location until it's measured?
I think it's ok for 'we don't know and can't prove this one way or the other yet' to be a valid scientific stance. It's a good way to avoid rampant scepticism which in my opinion is incredibly unscientific in itself. Also as a side note I was interested while watching this video to realise that the multiple universe theory is entirely separate from the idea of additional spatial dimensions. It's so great to live in a world (perhaps one of many worlds even) so full of possibilities.
I think that the multiverses aren’t off at some infinite distance, I think they’re right here with life forms and everything but they have more or less dimensions and we can’t perceive them.
2:58 I thought for every choice you make, an alternate reality exists where you made a different choice, and each choice expands upon the other. If anything; the ability to traverse other realities will be a possibility long before time travel.
Human organs are now a thing. Star Trek teleportation could kind of work. We just need to remove the ban for experiments on human clones to work out the memory and habits transfer.
Technically we “could” find evidence if, and only if, another universe impacted our own. The result would likely (speculation at best) leave a so-called “cold spot” where no matter is found cause it was pushed out of the way. This is extremely unlikely and only possible in “certain” types of multiverse so it may as well be impossible to test. On top of that even IF we were to find such a “cold-spot” it’s not even necessarily from such an event as it could be explained away as large quantum fluctuations being exponentially expressed in matter spread as the universe expanded.
Okay. At least the Level 3 Multiverse is somewhat testable... But its a Major Engineering feat. There are some recent papers released in the last 2 years from multiple PhD's (Eric Lenz, Shaun Fell, Lavina Heisenberg to name a few) That show Positive Energy FTL warp field solutions are possible within GR. And that FTL Travel does not break causality in a Many Worlds universe. So "Simply" all we gotta do is Engineer a Warp drive Ship capable of theoretical FTL speeds. And see if it goes FTL. Or just relativistic. If it goes FTL, multiverse. If it just goes relativistic, Single universe.
When it comes to the question of if there are multiple universes, I think about it like this name anything in our universe that there is only one of lol. It's definitely not a definite answer I do believe if you see one of something there are probably more than one of them.
11:30 Your conclusion does not follow from your premise. One can simultaneously believe that there are an infinite amount of universes with an infinite amount of conditions **and** that we are 'incredibly, ridiculously lucky' to live in one that supports the conditions for life. The two beliefs are not mutually exclusive.
@4:35 and @4:44 is a logical impossibility. There's either infinite universes or the multiverses that do exist follow the same physics. Infinite as described would have to include different physics laws possibilities. Unless you are specifically referring to an Infinite set defined by the count of possible Universes who do follow the same laws, though that set would have to be smaller than the set of all possible Universes with any physics as this smaller set is defined by a smaller entropy or set of possible values (ie. you have removed two variables thus two dimensions of possible results by limiting the set to same laws of physics, same laws of matter, of course here we're simplifying both into a single variable (set) instead of considering the likely uncountable (likely infinite) number of variables defining either (laws of physics, laws of matter) and the likely infinite amount of possible values for each set of variables, also just using the terms mentioned as it seems to me that the (set of the) laws of physics includes or defines the laws of matter, regardless of this, either method of simplification would in reality have to cover the the same set and dimensionality whether split in two or or not)
The Metro Map at 16:25 is that of the Washington D.C. Metro rail system. But, it's rotated 90 degrees and also backwards from the point of view of the person in the video. Or maybe this is proof he is living in another universe.
And that's the beauty of Stience. never satisfied that we've figured it all out, even our understanding of gravity isn't completely off the table, as far as at the Macro and Quantum levels.
I am offended SIR!!!! I am neither dumb or very young lol, it's not outside the realms of possibility. A few weeks ago many people thought that galaxies take billions of years to form, but that has now been reduced to millions of years. Thanks to JWST, imagine what we will know in another 1000 years ( thank you dark ages ) BTW I love your videos 😀
There are types of multiverse where it would be possible to observe the effects of another “universe” forces like gravity could leak across from other dimensions (a possible cause of dark matter), edge effects from other “universes” which share some coordinates in say spacial dimensions with our observable universe have been proposed a lot of them would be visible with gamma ray astronomy. One way of looking at it is we could be in the same position as someone proposing a heliocentric solar system with stars being other suns before the invention of the telescope. We can’t just look up and see the moons of Jupiter orbiting it, we can’t measure angles in the sky finely enough to observe parallax and get an idea of the distance to the sun etc etc.
I saw some physicist, maybe Michio Kaku, talking about how it is possible there is a univers where 1+1=3. So if that is true, then other universes could actually have vastly different laws of physics...and then maybe "superheros" could be a thing. Seems unlikey but still...
...I wouldn't doubt there is a universe where English evolved so that two equals (***) things and three equals (**) things. Wow. That is actually really hard to describe.
@@ravenwraith1017language would definitley be possible to have changes…but this physicist was literally talking math. I can’t even wrap my head around how that would work. I understand string theory before I can understand that. Lol.
1:02 Ok; love Simon, and get what he’s saying, but as the version of me fighting an opiate addiction and wondering if under other circumstances I would have resorted to heroin, it’s not that funny. Getting clean, the withdrawal was so bad, I got really close.
I think about this a lot. If the universe is consistent with the laws of physics, as we experience them, then the stuff that can happen is limited to the periodic table of the elements. The number of configurations of particles in accordance with the periodic table is limited; incomprehensibly huge, but still limited, and if the universe actually is infinitely large, then every configuration is being calculated out in real time, meaning that everything that CAN happen, IS happening somewhere else, even within the same universe, let alone a full-on multiverse.
I am very upset that the entire video wasn’t just an extended version of the three-minute intro of high-energy ranting for the entire eighteen minutes.
Hi Simon, you're certain don't have a shot at Scarlett Johansson? I'm an excellent conversationalist and my parents said I was handsome when I was growing up. Also, Quark's bar at the Hilton in Vegas was amazing. I still have a bottle of Romulan Ale somewhere, that would totally impress her I think.
I believe in a virtual multiverse. A single finite universe that happens over and over in every possible way until this exact universe reoccurs. As on a long enough time scale every possibility becomes a certainty every possibility is virtually real.
Where the script talks about there must be other universes because ours is perfectly suited to humans is a logical fallacy. In actuality, humans are evolved to suit the specific narrow parameters of the environment here on Earth; not the other way round. A consistent application of scientific method is needed throughout the script.
5'32'': "There should be an observable universe inside our infinitely large universe that is identical to our own roughly 10^10^115 meters away from us." 1. Observable to whom? 2. That estimate depends solely on presupposition that the metrics for any physical phenomena within our Multiverse is discrete, i.e. may contain only a finite number of values within any finite volume of spacetime. If it is continuous instead, this inference doesn't hold.
What about the cold spot? Like the possibility of a bubble universe that bumped ours or somehthing. I think it was proposed, but maybe just as one remote possibility.
The multiverse is real, as each channel Simon owns is actually hosted by his multiversal variants, which is exactly how he makes all the content.
This also explains why he doesn’t always remember whether he’s covered a particular topic before. 😊
This is Canon
Sounds right to me.
He uses a quantum computer. 😅
And one of him they oddly replaced with Simon Cowell which freaked me out a bit
In another universe, Simon restrains himself to one channel and the UA-cam Gods reward him for doing so
And in another universe Simon takes over every UA-cam channel and run the Monopoly on UA-cam and is a billionaire and found a way to upload his conscience into a cybernetic body and has became immortal running UA-cam for all times for his minions
Also in another universe he lets Sam and Danny out the basement 🤣
@@StevenLockey NEVER! That is a constant in every universe!
in one other universe Simon has very long hair on his head and is shaved…. imagine that weird universe… pigs fly probably in it and cows give chocolate milk and we are all slaves of the crab people also his last name is Shouter, Simon Shouter… also hes a communist and likes Lord of the Rings
lets call the long haired and shaved Simon the evil Simon Shouter…
😂😂😂😂
Somewhere out there are universes where Simon is watching videos on UA-cam presented by us, the audience 🤯
Allegedly.
Oh sh*t!!!🤔
Mind blown!
I'm glad I'm not in that version. I'm too lazy for all that mess
I read the same comment on an other of Simon's videos... Did I travel to another universe? 🧐😅
i was about to file a case but I saw allegedly 😢
I love how Simon can get savage at times, but also not take himself too serious. Also, his reactions to some of the script given him. Love all of your content, man. Always feel like I get entertained and learn something. Win win.
i like how i'm getting more Simon a week than i could ever need :D
There is a multiverse where Simon has hair and let Danny out of the basement? No...statistically that's still as much of a likelihood as the Scarlett Johansson chance.
I'll take a universe that doesn't have any ads or commercials. That would be a good multiverse to live in.
Ya just a word of mouth for a product.
Maybe that's just a subscriptions to paid UA-cam will get you there?
But then we wouldn't have Simon, who as we all know, loves that sweet sweet ad revenue 😁
Whoever is editing these is doing a great job. I love the new channel, it's like a sci-fi brain blaze.
Keep the videos coming Simon learning more from ur videos than I did at school and I've never been tempted to skip one, yet😮
Simon was animated AF in this video. Liked the info too. Another channel to subscribe to
It is my estimation that if a traversable infinite multiverse did exist, we wouldn't have to worry about it, because in at least one of them, some horrible despot would have already crossed through to all the other multiverses and destroyed them so his could be the only one.
Aspen is really bringing out Simon's chaotic side.
This is fantastic! Awesome channel. Now. Stargate Wormholes vs DS9 Wormhole video, when? Or Warp Drive science video, also when? :)
Just have to say the way you you do your thing is unique and awesome.....as Frank Carson said...its the way i tell em....keep up the great work mate
This is very quickly becoming my favorite SW channel.
Your BEST channel, man. Keep it up! & big thank you :-)
Very interesting video. I love all of your channels. It’s not often that you someone can both entertain and educate.. you do both perfectly! Well done Simon and team 😊👏🏻💯🙌🏻
I'm torn on this channel. I love the subject of it, but some of the videos are so full of sound effects that it is distracting.
multiverse theory explains how simon manages to run so many youtubes accounts at once. he must have twins from other universes
What if each of Simon’s channels is hosted by Simons from different universes? That’s the only way he could do so many channels at the same time
Your delivery has improved immensely over the years. I find all of your channels informational and entertaining.
Ryan Reynolds watched this and is now sad that you aren't keeping up on his life.
That was again awesome but when I saw you running away from that monster I laughed so hard it hurt. Thank you 😂 I needed that 👍
although I want to believe in a multiverse, when does a dream become just a dream, one could argue that fiction and science fiction are portals to other dimensions and multiverses, but aren't they just dreams. but then again we don't understand the brain enough to discount that if we can dream it, it may exist somewhere.
This channel is wild I like it, since BB got it’s nuts chopped off this is my new real blaze zone 😂. The OG BB is just like a podcast now and Simon sits down and just reads not true blazing
Simon, I hope you see this. You’re my favorite UA-cam personality. I know you work lots of channels but you are just so enjoyable to watch on all of them.
Just when I thought I had all the Simon Fact Boy channels, bam! One escaped me
This channel is Brain Blaze crossed with Proper Simon and it’s amazing!
what about a serial multiverse? What I mean is, what if there is only 1 universe at a time, but it is alternating - there is a big bang, the universe expands but starts to slow down until gravity pulls it all back into a a single point which then explodes into a new big bang which creates a new universe that might be different from the last one.
It's like you took the excited, coked-up (allegedly) Simon clone who used to host Brain Blaze and put him on this channel.
Loving this new channel Simon & team! Keep up the good work!
In the multiverse who is me? Or nature vs nurture? The closest one might expect is, of course, identical twins, but even with the same inherited trait and learned behaviors, they are still different. Thus should a me, from a different universe, is not me, but is more, a weird identical twin?
That intro was powered by a lot of .... ummm energy drinks
I think the sensation of Deja Vu is caused by the brief synchronization in time of an action performed by an individual and their alternate self from another universe
There may never be a way to prove if other universes exist, but the best clues may be in Quantum Mechanics. I have always believed in the Infinite Earths Theory even before I know a name for it as I believe that every discission branches to a different reality and all of these happen simultaneously. I am also sure there is an Earth that is still ruled by dinosaurs because Earth was never hit by an asteroid that devastated life. I also believe there is a universe where Simon and Scarlett are in an alley sharing a needle.
That means there's a universe where I sold them the heroin.
Here, animated Simon runs from the one eyed tentacle monster, in another he's married to it, and in a third he is the tentacle monster, sharing a needle with Scarlett Johansen.
@@BaronVonQuiplytrue
There's a universe where Truman recognized Vietnams independence and avoid one of history's grestest blunders.
Tricks on you Simon, I'm not wearing socks!
Ahhh the age old rivalry between science and philosophy, or as I call it: the battle between Eggheads and Thinkers.
Also, I could *realllllly* start a flame-war on this with...other topics...but I’m not in the mood today.
13:00 a big smile slowly creeps across my face as Simon begins to reacquaint us all with paradigm shifts in science. The one that's coming is a big'n !:-)
3:20 - Chapter 1 - 4 levels of multiverse
3:45 - 1st level
6:00 - 2nd level
6:55 - 3rd level
9:05 - 4th level
9:55 - Chapter 2 - Why does anyone believe this ?
12:35 - Chapter 3 - Doing science backwards
14:40 - Chapter 4 - Dangerous for science ?
17:10 - Wrap up
PS: Knowing the Whistlerverse and the many personas Simon employs, i can definitively affirm that it exists
So what you're saying, is that somewhere out there, I have just uploaded this video to UA-cam. While Simon watches it after a line of "battle powder" while being locked in Danny's basement?
HOLY SHIT!!! LMAO 11:11 That's brutal!! Well played sir.
It is a bit presumptuous to talk about multiverse as basically a belief system because lack of experimentation but string theory is in a similar situation. Just has pretty math to justify its belief. Which really just a pretty idea.
really enjoyable video. the only thing I can ask if you can cut back on the wired and wonderful graphics
Weird?
Could you do an episode on lightsabres please? These videos are solid gold by the way 👌👌
Sometimes i watch and then i will think "but what about THIS theory?"... and then I remember I'm watching a fun science channel, and not one of the field specific physics lectures I watch lol. But god do I miss Star Trek's dedication to putting in real effort when it came to the science. The new stuff hurts my fucking soul. It isn't the only part of the older trek series that they left behind, but it feels so empty without.
This has got to be the most blips I heard from one of your videos got to say its funny to hear
The ‘now know’ at 7:45 was dangerously close to Nigel Thornberry. I can’t unhear it, neither should you.
If you want an interesting multiverse show there is an old 90's one called Sliders where they go to a different multiverse in almost every eppisode. I don't know if any of the streaming services is showing it though.
Another thing that a multiverse could allow is Faster than Light travel without the risk of causing causal loops (aka paradoxes), because if you travelled back in time and altered the timeline the alteration would merely be swallowed by another universe, instead of making the main one inconsistent.
It’s pointless to even think about this concept.
Yet, you're making a comment. You've engaged in a pointless endeavor! This will send anti-matter particles across the multiverse, in a butterfly-effect manner, that no living astral physicist can even comprehend!
(Which, as a multi-dimensional being, I'm totally down with.)
Been a while since I've seen one of Simon's videos...has he started doing speed?
I would love to see a piece on the Three Laws of Robotics, Asimov "rules". Mainly because they keep getting brought up after the robot broke that kid's finger in a chess match, as if they are actual "laws", not something created by a science fiction writer as a basis for many of his books and stories.
It's a nice idea, but even in Asimov's work it only applied to sapient robots that think for themselves as opposed to just running through a programmed tree of options, a built-in safety to prevent the things shown in Terminator and The Matrix and Westworld &c. Current robots, it's on the human writing the code.
And if we’ve learned anything, it’s that humans are awful at writing code.
Ah, but sapient robots or androids- what if they began writing their own code? Robots improving their own AI, using pure logic, with no human unput? Would they still follow Asimov's Three Laws (which are flawed, as it is)? Or would they ditch them and create their own laws? Would we have Data or T-800?
Excuse me , a robot did what?
@@striker8961 This video shows it- the chess playing robot grabbed a 7-year old kid's finger while they were playing chess. Broke the kid's finger: ua-cam.com/video/fixQWq3HNZg/v-deo.html
By the way, a slight curve has been found in space/time. The universe is not infinite, but a closed system. Albeit an expanding one.
The multiverse concept is fascinating. The Mandela Effect, the people who lost their minds when they fired up the Hadron at Cern....thanks for the script Kevin, great writing as usual!!! Im a big sci fi and fantasy fiction fan, the "hard science" theories are a bit harder for my small brain are fascinating but mind bending, but the more fantasy rewrites of history are just plain fun sometimes, like the Whatif Machine in Futurama, or an "alternate history" series...
Thanks! I really wanted to include the Futurama machine somehow but couldn't get it in there
FWIW, It doesn't have anything to do with the Mandela effect; there is no way to end up in the "wrong" universe, there is no way one could possibly know which universe one's in, and the number of total universes is beyond anything we could possibly comprehend. To be clear: A given universe "splits" every time there is a quantum event (any interaction between subatomic particles, including a measurement).
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Event_(particle_physics)
I don't think Simon gave it a fair shake. Does it really make any more sense to propose that a given subatomic particle doesn't have an actual location until it's measured?
3:35 Is there a universe out there where Simon learns to trim his beard and it doesn’t look like a dead badger full of crumbs?
I think it's ok for 'we don't know and can't prove this one way or the other yet' to be a valid scientific stance. It's a good way to avoid rampant scepticism which in my opinion is incredibly unscientific in itself. Also as a side note I was interested while watching this video to realise that the multiple universe theory is entirely separate from the idea of additional spatial dimensions. It's so great to live in a world (perhaps one of many worlds even) so full of possibilities.
Simon has multiple channels in this Universe, image how many there are in the multitude of multiverses!
Hey! Hey! Do more of these right now! This channel has the potential to be epic!
I think that the multiverses aren’t off at some infinite distance, I think they’re right here with life forms and everything but they have more or less dimensions and we can’t perceive them.
I don't know about the multiverse, but with how many channels you appear in, I'm starting to believe in the MultiSimonWhistler
2:58 I thought for every choice you make, an alternate reality exists where you made a different choice, and each choice expands upon the other.
If anything; the ability to traverse other realities will be a possibility long before time travel.
I see a Simon from universe 2003.4-a7 has leaked into our universe. I am taking note of this and continuing to watch with interest.
Suggestion: How close are we to having real food replicators as seen in Star Trek The Next Generation? I know that 3D printer cookies are now a thing.
Human organs are now a thing. Star Trek teleportation could kind of work. We just need to remove the ban for experiments on human clones to work out the memory and habits transfer.
I have ADHD and I love fast paced videos but doggam Simon the energy here!
Technically we “could” find evidence if, and only if, another universe impacted our own. The result would likely (speculation at best) leave a so-called “cold spot” where no matter is found cause it was pushed out of the way. This is extremely unlikely and only possible in “certain” types of multiverse so it may as well be impossible to test. On top of that even IF we were to find such a “cold-spot” it’s not even necessarily from such an event as it could be explained away as large quantum fluctuations being exponentially expressed in matter spread as the universe expanded.
Lol ok bud
Love your new channel, Simon! But do you happen to sleep from to time ?
Simon m8, like you make enough cash to own a place big enough for all these people in your basement?
Okay. At least the Level 3 Multiverse is somewhat testable... But its a Major Engineering feat.
There are some recent papers released in the last 2 years from multiple PhD's (Eric Lenz, Shaun Fell, Lavina Heisenberg to name a few) That show Positive Energy FTL warp field solutions are possible within GR. And that FTL Travel does not break causality in a Many Worlds universe.
So "Simply" all we gotta do is Engineer a Warp drive Ship capable of theoretical FTL speeds. And see if it goes FTL. Or just relativistic. If it goes FTL, multiverse. If it just goes relativistic, Single universe.
When it comes to the question of if there are multiple universes, I think about it like this name anything in our universe that there is only one of lol. It's definitely not a definite answer I do believe if you see one of something there are probably more than one of them.
Van Swan Science has some staunch objections to your tone good sir!
11:30 Your conclusion does not follow from your premise. One can simultaneously believe that there are an infinite amount of universes with an infinite amount of conditions **and** that we are 'incredibly, ridiculously lucky' to live in one that supports the conditions for life. The two beliefs are not mutually exclusive.
@4:35 and @4:44 is a logical impossibility. There's either infinite universes or the multiverses that do exist follow the same physics. Infinite as described would have to include different physics laws possibilities. Unless you are specifically referring to an Infinite set defined by the count of possible Universes who do follow the same laws, though that set would have to be smaller than the set of all possible Universes with any physics as this smaller set is defined by a smaller entropy or set of possible values (ie. you have removed two variables thus two dimensions of possible results by limiting the set to same laws of physics, same laws of matter, of course here we're simplifying both into a single variable (set) instead of considering the likely uncountable (likely infinite) number of variables defining either (laws of physics, laws of matter) and the likely infinite amount of possible values for each set of variables, also just using the terms mentioned as it seems to me that the (set of the) laws of physics includes or defines the laws of matter, regardless of this, either method of simplification would in reality have to cover the the same set and dimensionality whether split in two or or not)
If there is a bright center of the multiverse, we're in the universe that's furthest from.
Damn, lighten up, mate! I guess there is always one misanthropic, nihilistic person.
The Metro Map at 16:25 is that of the Washington D.C. Metro rail system. But, it's rotated 90 degrees and also backwards from the point of view of the person in the video. Or maybe this is proof he is living in another universe.
According to one paper there is no universe in which a star will appear naturally green to our eyes
The Cool Words channel, hosted by Prof. David Kipping, explains this is detail too in "The Star that can't exist."
And that's the beauty of Stience.
never satisfied that we've figured it all out, even our understanding of gravity isn't completely off the table, as far as at the Macro and Quantum levels.
I am offended SIR!!!! I am neither dumb or very young lol, it's not outside the realms of possibility. A few weeks ago many people thought that galaxies take billions of years to form, but that has now been reduced to millions of years. Thanks to JWST, imagine what we will know in another 1000 years ( thank you dark ages ) BTW I love your videos 😀
There are types of multiverse where it would be possible to observe the effects of another “universe” forces like gravity could leak across from other dimensions (a possible cause of dark matter),
edge effects from other “universes” which share some coordinates in say spacial dimensions with our observable universe have been proposed a lot of them would be visible with gamma ray astronomy.
One way of looking at it is we could be in the same position as someone proposing a heliocentric solar system with stars being other suns before the invention of the telescope. We can’t just look up and see the moons of Jupiter orbiting it, we can’t measure angles in the sky finely enough to observe parallax and get an idea of the distance to the sun etc etc.
I saw some physicist, maybe Michio Kaku, talking about how it is possible there is a univers where 1+1=3. So if that is true, then other universes could actually have vastly different laws of physics...and then maybe "superheros" could be a thing. Seems unlikey but still...
...I wouldn't doubt there is a universe where English evolved so that two equals (***) things and three equals (**) things. Wow. That is actually really hard to describe.
@@ravenwraith1017language would definitley be possible to have changes…but this physicist was literally talking math. I can’t even wrap my head around how that would work. I understand string theory before I can understand that. Lol.
1:02 Ok; love Simon, and get what he’s saying, but as the version of me fighting an opiate addiction and wondering if under other circumstances I would have resorted to heroin, it’s not that funny.
Getting clean, the withdrawal was so bad, I got really close.
Im jealous of the version of myself that can afford heroin.
ikr? niml!
Have you already done a video on the theory we are a computer simulation due to the double slot experiment?
I think about this a lot. If the universe is consistent with the laws of physics, as we experience them, then the stuff that can happen is limited to the periodic table of the elements. The number of configurations of particles in accordance with the periodic table is limited; incomprehensibly huge, but still limited, and if the universe actually is infinitely large, then every configuration is being calculated out in real time, meaning that everything that CAN happen, IS happening somewhere else, even within the same universe, let alone a full-on multiverse.
5:27 If that were the case, shouldn’t there be a universe where it is possible to reach another universe?
I love that you've never seen any movie ever but you have seen the greatest star trek. I salute your pickiness today.
the double slit experiment proves magic may be real. it is not proof of magic, but the possibility it is a law of nature, somehow.
I did not expect you to solve the multiverse problem I expected someone smarter than you to have figured it out.
I keep seeing your face in thumbnails Simon, and it’s ALWAYS a different channel.. WTF how many channels does this man have?!
This channel makes you seem a lot more intelligent than the others. Rather interesting
In another universe Simon has ha real job to earn money.
I'm a little surprised more people haven't mentioned Sliders.
An obscure TV show from 30 or so years ago?
I am very upset that the entire video wasn’t just an extended version of the three-minute intro of high-energy ranting for the entire eighteen minutes.
Somewhere there is a universe composed entirely of my missing socks...
They didn't call him Shuma-Gorath for copyright reasons (heaven forbid Disney share its profits with creators), but good catch!
Hi Simon, you're certain don't have a shot at Scarlett Johansson? I'm an excellent conversationalist and my parents said I was handsome when I was growing up. Also, Quark's bar at the Hilton in Vegas was amazing. I still have a bottle of Romulan Ale somewhere, that would totally impress her I think.
I believe in a virtual multiverse. A single finite universe that happens over and over in every possible way until this exact universe reoccurs. As on a long enough time scale every possibility becomes a certainty every possibility is virtually real.
Where the script talks about there must be other universes because ours is perfectly suited to humans is a logical fallacy. In actuality, humans are evolved to suit the specific narrow parameters of the environment here on Earth; not the other way round. A consistent application of scientific method is needed throughout the script.
The multiverse is a scape goat for theoretical physics that would otherwise run into paradoxes and dead ends.
Great new channel man! Also u deff have a problem lol.
5'32'': "There should be an observable universe inside our infinitely large universe that is identical to our own roughly 10^10^115 meters away from us." 1. Observable to whom? 2. That estimate depends solely on presupposition that the metrics for any physical phenomena within our Multiverse is discrete, i.e. may contain only a finite number of values within any finite volume of spacetime. If it is continuous instead, this inference doesn't hold.
What about the cold spot? Like the possibility of a bubble universe that bumped ours or somehthing. I think it was proposed, but maybe just as one remote possibility.