The Economist, you are asking the question that you already know the answer. Stop playing smart with foolishness. The Chinese Military has already surpassed the American Military.
The Chinese Military has not surpassed the US military. Having a pile of stuff isn't the same as having well-practiced logistics to get it where you want it to go. And we don't know how much of that stuff is "tofu dreg" quality like Chinese housing and roads collapsing every week. Or the lack of drainage making yearly flooding so much worse. Or the Road & Belt Initiative projects that are falling down all over the world.
China should be scared of Donald Trump starting another trade war of tariffs. Russia won't fill the trade gap in the Chinese economy if US trade is priced out of the Chinese market.
Having more tonnage does not mean "they beat" anyone. Is 100000 tons of coastal patrol boats the same as one Gerald R. Ford-class aircraft carrier? China has two aircraft "cruisers" based on the Kuznetsov-class. Considering how poorly the _Admiral Kuznetsov_ has managed during the Ukraine War, China's decision to buy Russian carriers might not turn out as well you expect. Unlike western naval ships that use gas turbines or nuclear power, Admiral Kuznetsov is a conventionally powered ship that uses mazut as a fuel, often leading to a visible trail of heavy black smoke that can be seen at a great distance.
@sammiller6631 Gube it some time. No armed conflict will appear for atleast a decade. By that time China will have a real working navy that rivals ours. It's a numbers game and they can out produce and support a way larger navy, easy.
The Chinese navy, airforce and army are not nowhere near those of the West, not to mention the mighty US ones. The Chinese military assets are many but they are not tested in the battle field.
>>>I always look up your videos for update! Our government has no idea how people are suffering these days. I feel for people in crypto market tjat has no mentor and not getting the help they deserve, Thank you Mrs Holly Wright imagine investing $25,000 and receiving $100,300
technology and plus the "overcapacity".... haha
The Economist, you are asking the question that you already know the answer. Stop playing smart with foolishness. The Chinese Military has already surpassed the American Military.
The Chinese Military has not surpassed the US military. Having a pile of stuff isn't the same as having well-practiced logistics to get it where you want it to go. And we don't know how much of that stuff is "tofu dreg" quality like Chinese housing and roads collapsing every week. Or the lack of drainage making yearly flooding so much worse. Or the Road & Belt Initiative projects that are falling down all over the world.
haha, you are so right about China, please keep it, you are doing amazing
@@sammiller6631You are an anti China devil. Get outta here with your China hate.
It's over for the Empire.
Already done...
It's not done yet. Building more stuff does not mean you can get it where you want it quickly.
That DOLLAR PEG currency 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🎉🎉
Under Trump? Absolutely!
I'm shocked to see how far and fast how the Chinese military has come, the Donald Trump should be pretty scared.
China should be scared of Donald Trump starting another trade war of tariffs. Russia won't fill the trade gap in the Chinese economy if US trade is priced out of the Chinese market.
The Economists admirstion to the New Boss sounds like Monty Phythons Frying Circles 😅😅
But I thought that's why we developed nuclear weapons😳 exactly who got all that money???
Define surpass, then the answer to your question is easy.
Never in a quadrillion years
On the sea they beat us. On the land and air it's still us.
Having more tonnage does not mean "they beat" anyone. Is 100000 tons of coastal patrol boats the same as one Gerald R. Ford-class aircraft carrier? China has two aircraft "cruisers" based on the Kuznetsov-class. Considering how poorly the _Admiral Kuznetsov_ has managed during the Ukraine War, China's decision to buy Russian carriers might not turn out as well you expect. Unlike western naval ships that use gas turbines or nuclear power, Admiral Kuznetsov is a conventionally powered ship that uses mazut as a fuel, often leading to a visible trail of heavy black smoke that can be seen at a great distance.
Uh no.
@sammiller6631 Gube it some time. No armed conflict will appear for atleast a decade. By that time China will have a real working navy that rivals ours. It's a numbers game and they can out produce and support a way larger navy, easy.
@@phil20_20 Explain.
I LOVE AUKUS !!!
😂so you love losers?
do better content, don't stay mainstream.
The Chinese navy, airforce and army are not nowhere near those of the West, not to mention the mighty US ones. The Chinese military assets are many but they are not tested in the battle field.
Where usa weapons tested in weak countries where no air defence & weak
>>>I always look up your videos for update! Our government has no idea how people are suffering these days. I feel for people in crypto market tjat has no mentor and not getting the help they deserve, Thank you Mrs Holly Wright imagine investing $25,000 and receiving $100,300
Yeah, since meeting expert Wright , i now agree that with an expert managing your portfolio, the rate of profit is high with less risk
I really recommend Mrs Holly Wright's .she has been the key to my successful life and three of my friends also trade with her
Exactly her name!! Holly Wright's many have recommended highly of her and I'm just starting recently from Holland
I have reach up to 178k since i came across Holly my life has completely changed all thanks to her
Please enlighten me, I've come across this before, how can i get to her please?
a ha ha ha !
such naive and low end analysis befitting a propaganda outfit. shameful little trash paper