China Is Winning The ENERGY WAR (And More) | Dr. Kingsley Jones

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 242

  • @AnnieT369
    @AnnieT369 3 місяці тому +191

    Australia's problems comes from not being a sovereign country.

    • @TeohLieongChuan
      @TeohLieongChuan 3 місяці тому +10

      australia is the problem

    • @Soyepita-Pay-lh5eq
      @Soyepita-Pay-lh5eq 3 місяці тому

      Australia choses to be sinophobic and paranoid about its nearby neighbor and major trading partner, who has never attempted to colonize Australia or cause wars and conflict. Instead, Australia prefers to trust war mongers thousands of miles away to engage in alliances to further political intrigue, drama, and provocations. Australia thinks joining racist Anglo-alliances like Five Eyes is wise diplomacy 🙄

    • @yaoliang1580
      @yaoliang1580 3 місяці тому +24

      Australia is the only country that is not sovereign by choice and not due to force.
      They willingly encourage the US to take over all of their biggest and most profitable businesses and industries due to reasons best known to them

    • @StephenChung-mk9kc
      @StephenChung-mk9kc 3 місяці тому

      Dd

    • @theaconite1400
      @theaconite1400 3 місяці тому +9

      ​@@yaoliang1580idk if that's entirely fair. The US used force to coup Australia multiple times so far.

  • @gunsumwong3948
    @gunsumwong3948 3 місяці тому +30

    Actually there is no competition and China isn't wining either. The plain fact is China does what is right. China doesn't have vast oil and gas like the America or Australia so its energy has been dependent of coal. Solar, hydro and wind power generation helps China to lower the cost of electrical power.
    Already in China the installation costs of onshore wind and solar have reached parity at about US$580/kW which is cheaper than any other form of electricity generation. It is only natural for China to pursue and develop these renewable energy. Today China is the leader in each of solar, hydro, wind, battery and EV. All major public transportation in China in the form of HSR and metro are all electrified. That is how China manages its own affairs!
    Everything in China is based on necessity is the mother of invention. Like solar power China initially had to buy raw material, every component and part from the west and sell the finished products back to the west to earn money. It was taken to the cleaner by the western manufacturers manipulating the price. To save the last companies of the annihilated foreign-dependent solar power industries the Chinese government started building solar farm domestically and gave out subsidies like the west. China then realizes the only way to survive is to innovate and cut cost. It is responsible for cutting at least 95% of the global solar cost. In Wood Mackenzie 2023 report it was indicated EU solar cell cost double and the US 2.66 times of the Chinese. In fact in 12 month of 2023 China installed 217GW solar power which is more than any country's total capacity as the second rounder-up US had 179GW at the end of 2023.
    Once China has significant renewable energy it turns its attention to battery and EV. Today China manufactures about 60% of global EV. The combination of renewable energy and EV means mankind has no energy crisis and is independent on fossil fuel for goo! This is not to win the energy war but an endeavor to be sustainable and green.

    • @codzymajor
      @codzymajor 2 місяці тому

      Appreciated you taking the time to add clarity to China's approach to new renewable energy development.

  • @gandhi9936
    @gandhi9936 3 місяці тому +12

    The narratives in relation to Russia's energy has been anything but sensible.

  • @Gunni1972
    @Gunni1972 3 місяці тому +8

    I am glad that the Big Mac-index is not a viable indicator for GDP or CPI. There should be a CPI-Standard, so Governments can evade certain values important to it. Like the US one, that does not include Living(rent) or Transport costs. which make up a large percentage of "Living expenses".

  • @bjorntorlarsson
    @bjorntorlarsson 3 місяці тому +12

    As I have understood it, the sanctions and Taiwan's chip lead concerns only the most high end chips, and that China is the world leader in lower end chips. And only the lower end chips are used in cars and all kinds of machines (and missiles, aircrafts, communication, imaging). They do everything they need to do in their limited application and are on standby most of the time. Being faster only results in more standby time.
    The highest end chips are used for stuff like AI training and Bitcoin mining where the value created increases with chip speed without limit. Apparantly they are still useful in smartphones to psychologically give the user a true realtime feeling, but I would think that there is a limit closeby now beyond which faster chips have nothing more to add in that application.

    • @steinbauge4591
      @steinbauge4591 3 місяці тому +6

      Western factories were pressured to also limit lower end chips. China answered with a 2 fold strategy: first replace imports of legacy chips. This was a disaster for Western producers who lost the entire Chinese market. 2nd was a massive drive and investment which already has produced a result that is on the way to close the gap (with the notable new Huawei phone which is not quite on par yet, but performance was achieved in part by other means). They have far more engineering candidates etc, they will get there with high end chips too in a few years.

    • @Universe.Singer
      @Universe.Singer 3 місяці тому

      @@steinbauge4591DUV2 lithograph machines invented by China recently are able to produce 5nm chips and 3nm with QUAD technology patented by Huawei. They have been successfully used in some new semiconductor foundry companies in China. EUV lithography machine made by China will be released in 2025.since then China semiconductor industry no longer relies on western technology.

  • @Jay...777
    @Jay...777 3 місяці тому +12

    Julian Assange is free & is on his way to Australia.

    • @peanut0brain
      @peanut0brain 3 місяці тому

      His useless country Australia didn't fight for his freedom.

    • @level1selamat155
      @level1selamat155 3 місяці тому +1

      To be extradited to stand trial in the US

    • @Way827
      @Way827 3 місяці тому

      @@level1selamat155 He'd be safer away from the western world.

  • @katejudson8907
    @katejudson8907 3 місяці тому +3

    Totally agree about the company imperative to improve their product for the generation of Chinese most discriminating consumers. It's so refreshing to hear this analysis from an Australian. I had just about given up on the brainwashing of Australians in their ignorance of China. Thanks Pascal for having this guest speaker. Not that I have a fond attachment to what financial industries have done and are doing for the world ! 😂

  • @charlesyang4923
    @charlesyang4923 3 місяці тому +3

    Modern time civilization, especially post-industrial revolution, builds on energy or specifically hydrocarbon fuel whilst yesteryears civilization featuring either agrarian or nomadic builds on # of land & manpower or land & cattle. The tricky part is human can harness green energy without limitations by geographic locations, and this is where heaven lay flat ground for all competitors and power politics will shift to whoever country that can dominant this technology which is China today.

  • @dryeoh2023
    @dryeoh2023 3 місяці тому +2

    Great video! Intelligent and frank!

  • @chriswong9158
    @chriswong9158 2 місяці тому

    After Mao: Deng Xiaoping famously said "It doesn't matter whether a cat is black or white, as long as it catches mice."

  • @chew5461
    @chew5461 3 місяці тому

    @32:25 This is because they (customers) are spoilt for choice. Competition is really tough for the sellers who must offer better prices, more features at same/lower prices, better follow-up services, etc.

  • @peetsnort
    @peetsnort 3 місяці тому +1

    Australia has iron plus good engineering staff.
    Build coal fired powered electrical supply and invent good scrubbers.
    The captured co 2 has a good market

  • @MyVoice-bn1vj
    @MyVoice-bn1vj 3 місяці тому +5

    all country nations interest new global economy new currency support with China and kuck out old dollar old currency, we want new global currency

  • @davidschlessinger9945
    @davidschlessinger9945 2 місяці тому

    very anglo thing to think Hong Kong their former colony is so important

  • @harveytadman
    @harveytadman 3 місяці тому +2

    There is too much talk of cars here. A least in cities bicycles need to be promoted far more. Pedal cycles also benefit mental and physical health while being easy on the pocket. Come on get more progressive please.

  • @horridohobbies
    @horridohobbies 3 місяці тому

    16:12 America is the greatest nation on earth? Where are America's manufacturing supply chains? What happened to America's manufacturing base?

  • @AlbertoGonzalez-fz2zr
    @AlbertoGonzalez-fz2zr 2 місяці тому

    Traduzcan por favor

  • @kevinlaw6191
    @kevinlaw6191 2 місяці тому

    Chinese Over - the F - capacity

  • @kristoffervalen2935
    @kristoffervalen2935 3 місяці тому

    Don't Japan struggle with very low relative wages compared to other developed nations?

  • @mkuc6951
    @mkuc6951 3 місяці тому +2

    It's pretty complicated. China's big problems on the horizon are like the most amount of millionaires exiting, one child policy with huge amounts of men and no women, demographic issues, government corruption... I'd probably rather go long on the USA. When my wife went to china during university, all the Chinese friends she made moved overseas. People want to not be in a controlling dictatorship.

    • @Time4Peace
      @Time4Peace 3 місяці тому +2

      The mood has changed quite a lot.

    • @danwelterweight4137
      @danwelterweight4137 3 місяці тому

      Stop being an ignoramus who believes in American any propaganda about China without doing the minimum critical thinking and research or going there to see the country with your own eyes.
      Here are a couple of facts to disprove all the BS you just mentioned.
      The approval rate of Western Governments in the West is in the high 20% to low 30%.
      The approval rate for the government in China is over 88%
      Thete is no more one child policy. They finished that almost 10 years ago.
      Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Thailand and most European countries demographic situation is even worse than China. South Korea birth rate is 0.72 children per woman. The lowest in the world. The replacement rate for a population to replace itself is 2.01 child per woman.
      Demographics does not determine economic growth or success.
      All Eastern Europeans after the end of the cold war experienced massive population declines due to emigration, or women simply stopping having children.
      Yet in the last 30 years with the exception of Ukraine all these Eastern European countries from the Baltics to the Balkans have seen their economies grow at an break neck exponential rates.
      Meanwhile countries like Nigeria, Democratic Republic of Congo and Pakistan have seen their populations grow at a massive scale and yet their economies have either stagnated or gone backwards.
      Back in the 1980s and 1990s 80% of all Chinese students who went abroad to study in the West used to stay in the West.
      Today 80% of all Chinese students who go to West to study go back to China after they finish their studies.
      There are millions of women in China who are unmarried. They call them "left over women"
      There are no shortage of women for men.
      There are many reasons why Rich Chinese leave China.
      Not wanting to live in a "Dictatorship" is definitely not one of them since their number one destination is Singapore.
      Singapore is much more repressive than China. You can't even drive every day, buy chewing gum, litter or Jay walk in that country without either going to jail or getting a hefty fine.
      The number one reason why Chinese people immigrate is due to their children education. China's education system is incredibly competitive. If you don't get into the best universities , it's as if you never went to university.
      By going abroad their children will have a much better chance at getting into University.
      This is why so many rich Chinese immigrate.
      You don't understand the nature of the relationship between the Chinese people and their government or Chinese civilization and culture.
      In Chinese civilization and culture the government is the patriarch of the family.
      The government's role is provide security, order, food, shelter.
      The government is involved in the daily lives of its people.
      The government role is to look at what is good of the collective.
      Chinese civilization is based on Confucius teaching that emphasize a strong government, filial piety, respect for authority, the good of the collective over individualism. The Chinese people have a concept called the mandate of heaven, a need for a strong Emperor.
      Western philosophy is based on individualism, the rights of the individual over the collective, the philosophers of enlightenment like John Lock, Russou, Mills and the French Revolution.
      Dont apply your Western philosophies to Chinese people, culture and civilization.
      If you try to apply your Western values and Western philosophy to China and Chinese civilization nothing in China will make sense to you.
      Chinese people have a completly different perspective of what their government should be and do to Western people.
      They want a strong government that will provide them with order, security, prosperity, food, shelter and improve their living standards.
      In China they can't change political parties but they can change and shift core fundamental policies according their circumstances.
      They don't want that soft weak, inefficient, broken liberal democracy you see in the west where you cns change parties but the fundamental policies will always remain the same
      Furthermore, China is not a dictatorship.
      China has many different types of government.
      Each province has their own political system..
      Most of the decisions and policies in China are taken at the provincial and municipal level.
      The central government allows each province and municipalities a tremendous amounts of autonomy and freedom to run their own affairs according to their own situations.
      China is an incredibly decentralized system of government.
      The Central government is there to mediate between the various provinces and municipalities.

    • @FallenLeavesBackToRoots
      @FallenLeavesBackToRoots 3 місяці тому +3

      When did your wife go to university in China ? Forty years ago ?

    • @chiangkohsien9120
      @chiangkohsien9120 3 місяці тому +1

      又是一個沒有去過中國 而在無地放矢

    • @mkuc6951
      @mkuc6951 3 місяці тому

      @@chiangkohsien9120 my wife went to china, she said Tienemen square was full of cameras and guards, it felt like a psychological torture operation. One of her friends went past a hospital and there was a man with an open rotting flesh would sitting out the front, left to die. We have more freedom in western countries. Thats why people move here, from China.

  • @MrJchang27
    @MrJchang27 2 місяці тому

    China understand that electricity is the key for modernization. However, China is short of oil. Therefore, they got into wind, solar, etc. Yes, it costed a lot to develop. However, China is eating sweet fruit from their investment.

  • @SuhandiWijaya
    @SuhandiWijaya 3 місяці тому +159

    China is an example where taxpayers' money goes to the people: infrastructure, lifted 850 million out of poverty, green energy, etc, whereas the US is the perfect example where the government is working for the corporations' interests where the people have no more power in their hands.

    • @peanut0brain
      @peanut0brain 3 місяці тому +26

      But they are continued to be fed the delusion that they have a choice every 4yrs therfore "dêmókrazy" is the best lol.

    • @SuhandiWijaya
      @SuhandiWijaya 3 місяці тому

      @@peanut0brain Indeed. It's more like DemonCrazy 🤣 They are fighting each other over Republicans and Democrats while they are balls from the same 🍆

    • @SuhandiWijaya
      @SuhandiWijaya 3 місяці тому +1

      @@peanut0brain more like DemonCrazy 😈 They always choose one of the two🏀🏀 of the same 🍆

    • @SuhandiWijaya
      @SuhandiWijaya 3 місяці тому +17

      @@peanut0brain more like DemonCrazy 😈🤣

    • @goransnow2180
      @goransnow2180 3 місяці тому

      This is definition of Fashism

  • @honahwikeepa2115
    @honahwikeepa2115 3 місяці тому +101

    BRICS all day. Happy to see NZ PM welcome Chinese business into NZ without an AUKUS problem.

    • @yaoliang1580
      @yaoliang1580 3 місяці тому

      Both Australia and New Zealand are insignificant markets for Chinese products. In fact it's Australia that benefited the most from trade with a prosperous China. They benefited so much that they are labelled, the lucky nation. The Chinese FM is there just to give these little rascals some lessons in discipline

    • @thisiskevin1000
      @thisiskevin1000 3 місяці тому +4

      NZ foreign policy is very flexible.
      It even has disagreements with Australia by the way over nuclear weapons deployment in the South Pacific.

    • @cart172
      @cart172 2 місяці тому

      Don't be like Australia. I'm ashamed to say our government will follow the USA off the edge of a cliff if they commanded it.

  • @deanzaZZR
    @deanzaZZR 3 місяці тому +81

    Not only is China being denied high end CPU/GPUs for EVs, China is being denied high end CPU/GPU for medical imaging, civil engineering, high energy physics, climate studies, etc. That the Western media glibly ignores such "side effects" is truly sad.

    • @marcobsomer5574
      @marcobsomer5574 3 місяці тому +2

      le monde n'existerait que grâce à des "puces" ? Encore une doxa de financier.
      Je ne partage pas cette émission, c'est la première fois.

    • @vgstb
      @vgstb 3 місяці тому +4

      @@marcobsomer5574 Signification ?

    • @steinbauge4591
      @steinbauge4591 3 місяці тому

      climate studies is BS

    • @ziegle9876
      @ziegle9876 3 місяці тому

      China will quickly build their own…. And leapfrog the western ones.

    • @raymonddon8875
      @raymonddon8875 3 місяці тому +1

      China only can depend on China... that was the key to success!

  • @horridohobbies
    @horridohobbies 3 місяці тому +23

    4:44 "...having a different form of government..."
    This is KEY. Global economics should have NOTHING to do with how China is governed. China's form of government is China's business and it does not concern anybody else.
    China respects all nations. China trades with all nations. China is all about win-win cooperation.
    Unlike the USA and Europe, China has fought NO WARS in the last 45 years, making it the most peaceful world power the world has ever known. China has sanctioned no nation, except to push back on foreign interference (e.g., Australia and Lithuania). China demands respect and it has earned it.
    The issue is that the United States is jealous and fearful of China's rise. China's success has exposed the cracks in the West's economic and political system, so China must be "contained."

    • @mijmijrm
      @mijmijrm 2 місяці тому

      Exactly. USA is the international dictator ... but somehow that isn't important because the folks at home get to choose between psychopaths to threaten the world.

  • @moniruzzamankhan8218
    @moniruzzamankhan8218 3 місяці тому +36

    A rational Australian

    • @chriswong9158
      @chriswong9158 2 місяці тому

      One kind of "Energy" Australian cannot waste !!! Brain Power..

  • @MediaFolkus
    @MediaFolkus 3 місяці тому +26

    The US’s manufacturing envy of China is a mismatch of desire to do that which it put itself in the position to not be able to do through an atrophied manufacturing sector.
    At a time when every nation is to be radically reinventing their infrastructure and economies while the individual, family and communities change - fighting over who gets to be the preeminent ‘green transitioner’ is defeating the whole effort TO change.
    It’s bad enough that the US has such economic envy of China over green manufacturing, but the US with its western cronies go onto blow holes in pipelines to stop the other nation (that they have economic envy with instead of relations) from selling gas that they want to be selling instead - all the while encouraging and funding war, causing greater greenhouse emissions, not stopping it.
    Instead, the US and the west could be working in tandem with China, Russia and the rest of the world.
    *Imagine where we’d be right now - if only ONE nation would decide to cooperate instead of sabotage.*

    • @Way827
      @Way827 3 місяці тому

      The US is the problem.

    • @chriswong9158
      @chriswong9158 2 місяці тому

      Your too long in the messaging !!! Get to the point !!! next time.

  • @SuhandiWijaya
    @SuhandiWijaya 3 місяці тому +78

    “It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal.” - Henry Kissinger

    • @archstanton5973
      @archstanton5973 3 місяці тому

      Try to find something original.

    • @chriswong9158
      @chriswong9158 2 місяці тому

      @@archstanton5973 What about this: Australia's Defence Policy In 2023 Explained
      ua-cam.com/video/sgspkxfkS4k/v-deo.html

    • @chriswong9158
      @chriswong9158 2 місяці тому

      @sandponics Should had join ASEAN long ago... instead of QUAD and AUKUS.

    • @chriswong9158
      @chriswong9158 2 місяці тому

      @sandponics Sorry, BRICS+ does not welcome USA Lap Dogs. Ask France why they were rejected 2023.

  • @ricardocitera8663
    @ricardocitera8663 3 місяці тому +19

    Great interview Pascal.

  • @peetsnort
    @peetsnort 3 місяці тому +68

    Julian is free

    • @dinnerwithfranklin2451
      @dinnerwithfranklin2451 3 місяці тому +1

      Brilliant news this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • @level1selamat155
      @level1selamat155 3 місяці тому +1

      Partially for now, indicted yet to stand trial if home country extradites him to US

    • @chriswong9158
      @chriswong9158 2 місяці тому

      No help nor leadership of the Australian government.... How much of a Lap Dog is Australian to the American.
      How does the World compare Russia to America in this kind of issue..... Russian do a better job in Jailing ????

  • @nadiawheeler4772
    @nadiawheeler4772 3 місяці тому +17

    US can never keep other Nations from progressing
    Great international

    • @chriswong9158
      @chriswong9158 2 місяці тому

      and yet, European and Australian are lead by the American in the U.S.A. when all others are laughing...

  • @lucjansobol2024
    @lucjansobol2024 3 місяці тому +12

    Świetna dyskusja ! One of the best short discussion explaining Chinese economy crucial issues from the current standpoint with glimpse into the future , we all need more . Pascal you are the top-notch interviewer, and Dr Jones insight is breathtaking, thanks both of U❤

  • @peggymog
    @peggymog 3 місяці тому +14

    Very interesting. Thanks from Ireland 🇮🇪

  • @KennyL0009
    @KennyL0009 3 місяці тому +3

    This guy is mistaken. Hong Kong is never oppressed politically. He is still biased with western political view. Deep inside, he wants to return to the past.

    • @davidbosak7503
      @davidbosak7503 2 місяці тому

      Hong Kong was essentially an apartheid dictatorship under Great Britain. The Governor was always a white guy picked by the British monarch to rule over the 99% non-white majority. No Chinese person ever held power in Hong Kong until China took over. Now at least a native Chinese Hong-Konger is in charge. Furthermore, the Governor is elected from a set of approved candidates. Previously, there were no elections at all. Amazing to me how many people miss the big picture. The Hong Kong government is much more representative of the people now than it was under Great Britain.

  • @DundeeDazza
    @DundeeDazza 3 місяці тому +6

    I have been spending quire a bit of time in Hong Kong, without doubt, like Taiwan, any unrest was fed by the US & UK. Had a good look around Macau as well, gambling houses packed with mainland China people.

  • @leondee918
    @leondee918 3 місяці тому +7

    The problem with the West and China relations is that deep in the West's psyche, China always perceived as a threat, maybe simply because China adopts different ideology. It's strange actually, since China doesn't tangibly impose nor spread its ideology to any other countries at all times

    • @nobodyli6543
      @nobodyli6543 2 місяці тому

      maybe because it's simply a better system

    • @mijmijrm
      @mijmijrm 2 місяці тому

      China is a threat because it shows it has a functioning, thriving social/political/economic system that is an alternative to what the parasitic US Empire has to offer.

    • @WinstonSmite
      @WinstonSmite 2 місяці тому

      different ideology' is just a bullshit excuse. The West just want to hold on to their global dominance/hegemony.
      U.S. had no problem working with, investing in and importing from China in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s. China's governing system/ideology is the same then as now, so what has changed?
      Heck, now the U.S. wants to court Vietnam as a friend/ally. Barack Obama, Donald Trump, Kamala Harris and Joe Biden all tripped over themselves to visit Vietnam. And Vietnam is more communist than China!
      Also, Russia is no more 'Soviet', and now holds elections. Apparently this means nothing to the West.

    • @pb3392
      @pb3392 2 місяці тому

      Not only different ideology, but also race!

  • @nurainiarsad7395
    @nurainiarsad7395 3 місяці тому +7

    Ultimately most countries wasted time in denial of the necessity of the energy transition, whereas China quickly got over the stages of grief and got on with it, while also being able to ignore all the armchair critics who expect a systemic transition to happen exactly perfect every step of the way.
    Also China understood that the energy transition needs to be themselves but also the developing countries whose peak energy demand is yet to come, whereas Europe was busy trying to be “first” and either missed or purposely delayed the business value of simultaneously transitioning their energy systems as well as developing markets.

  • @RobertOwen-u2i
    @RobertOwen-u2i 3 місяці тому +16

    One thing I really appreciate about Neutrality Studies is the diversity of interviewees with different views. Although I have the highest respect for other anti US involvement in Ukraine, the speakers are usually the same and I know what they are going to say.

  • @jjg8981
    @jjg8981 3 місяці тому +2

    Your looking at it way too simplistically. Australia made the decision to not focus on manufacturing, politicians said to the people don't worry we will be the smart country. The western countries have open sourced 95% of its technology through universities. They have trained foreign students on mass, this has allowed countries like china to leap frog in terms of years it What the would normally take to acquire tech. Then there is long held practice of intellectual theft, in every area including military.
    In China's case what they could not learn by having thousands of joint ventures with western manufacturers, they paid for, employing the western engineers when needed, even designers from Italy and Germany.
    Getting back to Australia being the smart country, most rising countries are as smart as us or smarter, are hungrier for success than we are. The authoritarian governments just give the order and a times the whole counties gets behind it. Chinese government makes things happen, Australian politicians fight amongst themselves for years and then wonder what happened.
    China has already won the renewables race and are now working on the nuclear race, out of the 59 new nuclear reactors under construction, 25 are in China and are being built by China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC). Solar and wind just are not reliable enough, you will need a over capacity of up to 300% to allow for the days and weeks of cloudy weather on a week of no wind, China is well aware of this. If there is a small scale nuclear war, or a large meteor hits earth, solar out put will be significantly reduced.
    Unfortunately Australia will need nuclear technology at some point in the future from a military stand point. Just look at what Russia has been able to do because the threaten everyone with nukes. Australia will need nuclear weapons we don't know if the USA will always be willing or able to defend us if they are kept busy. China has already threatened Australia with a potential missile attack reminding us they have the capability. If we get USA subs they will need to be nuclear armed to have a effective deterrent.
    Australia needs nuclear just like most other countries have realized they will. Australia is handing out financial help because of high power bills even though we have massive amounts of roof top solar, people got rebates and grants for cheap instillation, the replacement costs over the next 20 years is going to wipe out a lot of the house energy saving from solar. Now lets imagine that every car, motorcycle, bus, tram and train is electric. In that world we simply will not be able to produce and store enough from renewables alone with back up in case of disasters, massive hail storms, carrington event or an emp attack most likely would take out large solar farms. People need to stop living in a world of rainbows and pixy dust.

  • @GMATveteran
    @GMATveteran 3 місяці тому +3

    10:00 - America's pre-war oil embargo vs Japan is, at best, a loose analogy to its current semiconductor "embargo" vs the PRC, & inadequately reflects the current situation, because:
    1. Unlike Japan, China is not in a war, & doesn't have an urgent, life-or-death shortage of semiconductors that could doom it;
    2. The PRC can create bottlenecks for the US, just as the US can do so for it; China produces & refines a significant percentage of critical raw materials (e.g. gallium), without which cutting-edge semiconductors (the market segment in which the US has a leading advantage) cannot be manufactured;
    3. If there was an armed conflict over Taiwan, the semiconductor supply chain disruption would be comparably harmful for both, since the US relies on TSMC's fabs in Taiwan for the majority of its semiconductor production;
    4. The PRC is actually closer to building a complete, indigenous, end-to-end semiconductor value chain inside its own borders than the US, despite being behind on leading edge nodes.
    Bottom line - if there was a full scale conflict between the US & PRC, both sides will suffer significant disruptions, but in many ways, the PRC - NOT the US - will be the one that is better positioned to mitigate those disruptions.

  • @eberger02
    @eberger02 3 місяці тому +4

    I have long thought the war in Ukraine was about mineral wealth. Long before Lindsay Graham said as much. Just look up where the lithium is in Europe, North America and Russia. The USA may have a fair amount but it can’t get to it because on the environmental destruction it causes, western Europe has little meanwhile Russia has loads of other minerals but not that much lithium, although it gets on with China who has lots. Add the precariousness of getting lithium from Australia to Europe/North America and the USA’s unpopularity in South America and a fight over the lithium stores in Ukraine was almost inevitable. The odd thing is that the USA/west wasn’t happy to get 80% and wanted 100%, but now risks getting less than 10%. Those mines in a devolved Donbas would have still sold to the EU and USA before. Chile and Bolivia are just lucky they are so too far away for a US invasion.

  • @bowenb9336
    @bowenb9336 3 місяці тому +2

    I agree with the idea of energy and currency from Professor Jones. But I don't agree with his view that currency devaluation will help Japan revive its economy. Japan's decline was profound. The efficiency of government operations, dependence on imported raw materials and food, people's education level, infrastructure construction, lack of labor, etc. are all problems that cannot be solved by monetary policy.

  • @brudamo9203
    @brudamo9203 3 місяці тому +2

    Yanis Varoufakis acknowledges Chinas cloud capital capabilities as being comparative to the US.

  • @pravdaseed64
    @pravdaseed64 3 місяці тому +1

    🛰️ Taikonaut 🛰️
    🛰️ Space Station
    🛰️ Satellites. 🛰️
    🌀 5-G + 6-G &...
    🚀 Hyper Sonics
    🚀 Submarines
    🚀 Craft Carriers
    🚀 Jet fitters
    🚀 C 119.crafts
    🚀 Drones ...🚀
    🧞 Master of:
    Land, Marin &
    Space
    Construction...
    & Beautiful people
    With over + 8.000
    Years intelligent
    And cooperative
    Culture...🥇🐉
    💚🐉🇨🇳🐉💚
    🌀☸️☯️🕉️🌀
    🌜🌍👀🌎🌛
    i wish i was
    💙Chinese💙

  • @andrewcruz-nz1eb
    @andrewcruz-nz1eb 3 місяці тому +3

    Renewable energy hv help China improve the quality of air in China n lower air pollution 😅😅😅

    • @davidbosak7503
      @davidbosak7503 2 місяці тому

      Yes, everyone forgets this. West used to bash China relentlessly for the filthy air and water. So China developed their clean power tech and turned the pollution around. Now all the clean power tech is under sanctions and tariffs. They can't win.

  • @ramed1954
    @ramed1954 3 місяці тому +2

    Why to use the word "war" constantly, almost in every subject? Guess it's not gently.

  • @michaelto2813
    @michaelto2813 2 місяці тому +1

    To say cheap Chinese imports caused low U.S. CPI and hence a low interest rate policy is the culprit of current US problem, is missing a major factor. That is the over supply of money printed. Without easy supply of money, just cheap Chinese import can not cause enormous reality rise.

  • @liamporter1137
    @liamporter1137 3 місяці тому +3

    Thanks for sharing and surfacing the truth. 👏👍

  • @shaundudley4576
    @shaundudley4576 3 місяці тому +3

    Pascal can really try to contain his blubbering. Just when the guest gets to where you most want to hear where he is going Pascal has to interrupt and blubber.

    • @ziegle9876
      @ziegle9876 3 місяці тому

      And such snipes like “when people stop wanting gold the price goes down”…. Must have learned that in high school economics class….

  • @alphaomega1969
    @alphaomega1969 3 місяці тому +1

    For your information the litography machine was invented by china and sold to the west. You got the story all wrong! The turbine or jet engine was also a chinese invention given to the British during colonial wars as a peace treaty.

  • @Lost_Johnny
    @Lost_Johnny 3 місяці тому +5

    Dr. Kingsley Jones has a very good understanding of China, its consumers and its industries. He is right about Tesla - although they still sell quite well in China, they do look stale and dull compared to even most BYD cars, let alone Zeekr or Nio. BTW, Hong Kong will be a SAR after the 50 years is up. The only thing that has really changed in HK is that there can be no more outside interference. I am not sure why using the Hong Kong $ necessarily means that the US$ has to be used. It will be pegged to the RMB one day.

  • @unreliablenarrator6649
    @unreliablenarrator6649 3 місяці тому +1

    China made it hard for foreign investors? Um, no. Look at the FDI stats fr the last 30 years.,

  • @craigrik2699
    @craigrik2699 3 місяці тому +2

    Australia missed a huge opportunity in renewable energy. I travel a lot around WA, I noted the Aboriginal communities around the place. In 2012, Premier Barnett started closing them down, I wondered why. They were too expensive to run, I wondered that. It turns out, the governments (both State and Federal), when setting up a community, would install services and infrastructure, for a small town, the smallest possible, i.e. sewage plant, power needs etc. Most communities numbered between 8-15 families, with infrastructure for 5000 people! This was the norm!!! Over at least 60 years!!! Come on Aussie? This shows the power of the fossil fuel industry in Australia, and the power they wield

  • @bundleofperceptions1397
    @bundleofperceptions1397 3 місяці тому +1

    22:58 - “...and you know the assumption underlying that is that, oh well of course Democrats
    innovate and cooperate and collaborate, and autocrats can't innovate, because they're autocratic, they …. by definition autocracy has one person telling everybody what to do, so how could you be innovative?” Are you kidding me with this? From the White House -- "Healthy market competition is fundamental to a well-functioning U.S. economy. Basic economic theory demonstrates that when firms have to compete for customers, it leads to lower prices, higher quality goods and services, greater variety, and more innovation.[1] Competition is critical not only in product markets, but also in labor markets.[2] When firms compete to attract workers, they must increase compensation and improve working conditions." Communists and Socialists collaborate and cooperate, not "democracies".

  • @PatrickFgWiLeung
    @PatrickFgWiLeung 2 місяці тому +1

    don't forget there is also the high pressure long distance of electricity transmission techniques 😱

  • @chriswong9158
    @chriswong9158 2 місяці тому

    Issue risk China - Australia's Defence Policy In 2023 Explained - ua-cam.com/video/sgspkxfkS4k/v-deo.html

  • @qake2021
    @qake2021 3 місяці тому +1

    👌👍🇧🇷🇷🇺🇮🇳🇨🇳🇿🇦➕️👍👌

  • @philipzaccheus8398
    @philipzaccheus8398 2 місяці тому

    Informative Information for knowledge seekers listening is an important asset. GET INFORMED THROUGH THE LEARNING VERY NEEDED PROCESS.

  • @chriswong9158
    @chriswong9158 2 місяці тому

    54:00 low value of currency does mean better export, BUT one fact changes that rule "Trust".
    If you app is true, ask why does not world purchase more from Africa, India, Japan, So America today...
    One other issue in question is with low value of one own currency mean INFLATION of cost of living aka $1.00 US single Egg

  • @rogerstarkey5390
    @rogerstarkey5390 2 місяці тому

    China very specifically DOES invest in the SMALL companies and NOT the large established corporations.

  • @chriswong9158
    @chriswong9158 2 місяці тому

    46:00 The US Dollars: Yes some trade will be done in US Dollar, but now others currency can and will be use in world trade.
    The underling again in this issue is $20 Trillions $$$ printed US Dollar are going back to USA in exchange for goods.
    And now, some good worldwide if choice must be purchase in local currency other then Dollar. Thanks to US Sanction.

  • @chriswong9158
    @chriswong9158 2 місяці тому

    34:00 today, China is like WATER.... it can move where all other fail....

  • @jaswindersian3159
    @jaswindersian3159 Місяць тому

    Idealogy is a spent force. The better focus is to use any technology, systems, pathways, or design. China has proved the limitations of the new dynamic thinking.

  • @chriswong9158
    @chriswong9158 2 місяці тому

    China action: refer to Queen Victoria Great Britain Era, expand, share British Tech and develop new market for Brits goods.

  • @jaswindersian3159
    @jaswindersian3159 Місяць тому

    Each currency has a natural way of holding its own value just like water finds its own level.

  • @othmanmajid6380
    @othmanmajid6380 2 місяці тому

    Kingsley Jones really says it as it is, and has an old school innocence capable of depth and humour. Nice😂😊

  • @rcrinsea
    @rcrinsea 2 місяці тому

    I'm old enough to remember when Japan was seen as pre-eminent. How times have changed. I can't believe how irrelevant Japan has become.

  • @jaswindersian3159
    @jaswindersian3159 Місяць тому

    Australia is smart to protect its own way and autonomous sovereignty.

  • @Michaelfrikkie
    @Michaelfrikkie 3 місяці тому

    Solar power will always be a highly commoditized & transactionally intensive form of energy, unlike other energy infrastructures that are less dependent on commodities and far less transactional dependencies i.e. it is almost in a hidden sphere of the market, while enabling the market. This reality is exposed when considering that the US has demonstrated that energy independence can be achieved within a few decades - the shale gas revolution. The US is already advancing toward the next phase of energy independence with next-generation thorium-based nuclear energy, which is extremely exposed to global proliferation due to the low resource need and thorium's more abundant and widely distributed globally. Thorium-based nuclear energy is, at this stage, the only true form of energy supply that can sustain economic activity in any future modern community. Debating the merits of energy supply as the essential product of globalised commerce is not wise. Energy should not be the primary reason for commerce; rather, it should enable all other forms of commerce, just as the sun has always done.

  • @gerardy7500
    @gerardy7500 2 місяці тому

    @30:08, Regarding Tesla, he is right, the inside is 'tired'.

  • @haoruchen4216
    @haoruchen4216 2 місяці тому

    the west should have a sense of shame but it doesn't. what can u do?

  • @trevortucker1
    @trevortucker1 2 місяці тому

    Was great until the Tesla bit then l turned off

  • @chenseongchin8600
    @chenseongchin8600 2 місяці тому

    An informative article!

  • @aleaiactaest8354
    @aleaiactaest8354 3 місяці тому

    Great interview and fantastic guest!
    For similar analysis of interaction of markets and macro economics with geopolitics you might consider eg Louis-Vincent Gave, Doomberg and even Luke Gromen.
    Anyway, love the channel.

  • @leonchu4330
    @leonchu4330 3 місяці тому +1

    The semi-conductors that EV needs are of higher nanometer types that China can produce even under sanction. BYD produces and uses semi-conductors that it's own factory produces ad is mostly self-sufficient in all the important components in its own EVs. That's one of the main reasons that BYD could offer EVs with such attractive prices!

  • @philipzaccheus8398
    @philipzaccheus8398 3 місяці тому

    Informative Information for knowledge seekers listening is an important asset.
    FOR ME NOW I'VE MORE ATTENTIVELY LISTENED BECAUSE THERE AN ACCEPTANCE TO A NON CONCURRENT ATTITUDE "BUSINESS" ALWAYS IN THE FOREFRONT OF ECONOMIC CONTROLL FROM THE UK'S IMPERIAL DAYS WITH ALL RACIAL INFERIOR SUBJECTS.

  • @CharlesBrown-xq5ug
    @CharlesBrown-xq5ug 3 місяці тому

    A thought experment, an impractical device that is easy to check for mechanical workability. Its parts are large enough to act as everyday mechanisms but small enough to work well with the nanometer scale thermal motions of gas molecules. This device hypothetically creates self powered thermal diversification:
    Sketch made with keyboard characters:
    COLD ())--:PARTITION:-->> HOT
    Key
    ()) = Paddlewheel.
    -- = Axle. (Continuous from end to end)
    : : = Axle tunnel going through a wall.
    >> = Lumped friction element
    Please visualize two chambers full of inert gas separated by a very thin partition. The partition is thin to delicately support billions of separate nanometer scale short axles running straight through loosely enough to rotate freely but not leak very much heat so the chambers can hold separate temperatures.
    On the left side, a very small paddlewheel is mounted at the left end of each axle. On the right side, lumped friction elements are mounted stationary in place on the partition, one for each axle, for the right end of each axle to run through. The lumped friction elements convert the mechanical rotation of their axle into heat. The lumped friction elements do not impart Brownian motion to their axle.
    Brownian motion (a nanometer scale effect) turns the paddlewheels at random speeds randomly clockwise or counterclockwise. This random rotation is turned into heat by the lumped friction elements.
    The committed, linked, and functional roles of the walls, paddlewheels, axles, and lumped friction elements in differnt places should systemically produce a divergence in the thermal energy in the two chambers without adding external energy.
    Aloha

  • @mariesc5996
    @mariesc5996 3 місяці тому +3

    I just want to point out how much of a gentleman Mr Jones is for smoothing over Pascal's mistake (normal when using one's second language) by integrating it into his comments from then on... so nice to see. His parents raised him well. Also, I always feel so much smarter after one of Paval's videos. Thank you!

  • @junli6065
    @junli6065 3 місяці тому

    😂😂😂intransparent process of getting government money in China vs. extremely transparent process of lobbying in US. Which process is more friendly to the smaller guys, I wonder?

  • @mikelluna5925
    @mikelluna5925 3 місяці тому

    Where I live they call a Tesla car a washing machine.

  • @herminator250
    @herminator250 3 місяці тому

    Thanks for sharing this fascinating discussion on the relationship of such complicated topics such as geopolitics and global economics.

  • @aryaman05
    @aryaman05 3 місяці тому

    For ships, plenty of alternative bio-sourced fuel types, e.g.: DME, DEE, methanol or even biomass, and solar sourced - NH3 and Hydrogen.

  • @JBear-in1ql
    @JBear-in1ql 3 місяці тому

    Based on data it is not true that China has monopolies that operate similar to the monopolies in the US. In the last few years China has even cracked down on many of their large companies’ monopolistic behavior, including Alibaba and Tencent. Another example is BYD and CATL does not have a monopoly, since they have to compete with scores of other companies in the EV and battery market. They are just currently the largest and have to remain very innovative to stay competitive. These large incumbents cannot easily do backroom deals to gain political financial support given the crackdowns on corruption. All one has to do is walk into one of the many expos or electronic markets in China and see the multitude of small innovators and entrepreneurs striving to make their mark.

  • @3dagedesign
    @3dagedesign 3 місяці тому

    currency is a man made, "agreed system of exchange", capable of great fluctuation, including collapse.
    gold is a finite resource, and as more is mined, used, sent off planet or removed from the available usable resource, the price of the remaining commodity on earth will naturally increase.

  • @horridohobbies
    @horridohobbies 3 місяці тому

    Ironically, US weapons (missiles, planes, etc.) are highly reliant on Chinese chips!!!

  • @voice4voicelessKrzysiek
    @voice4voicelessKrzysiek 3 місяці тому

    He has no idea what's coming from Tesla! He speaks with such confidence while being so outrageously misinformed.

  • @mechannel7046
    @mechannel7046 3 місяці тому

    45:30 USD pegged to HKD, so USD will not disappear in international trade 49:00 gold returns in Australian dollars after China joined WTO

  • @humdrum40
    @humdrum40 3 місяці тому

    Mr Lottaz, if only you could interview Mr Daniele Ganser!❤❤

  • @GarrethOriley
    @GarrethOriley 3 місяці тому

    52:00 And the gap is getting accumulated in ever smaller amounts of the basket of people with all the implications that has on living cost etc.. I understand if an investor might not go there willingly.
    I do not understand how dedollarisation is mixed up with currency those are different things.

  • @thisiskevin1000
    @thisiskevin1000 3 місяці тому

    There is BRICS+ partners Russia, Iran and the Arab world as well

  • @tonyoostenbrink7808
    @tonyoostenbrink7808 3 місяці тому

    earlier today I watched Lottaz interview an Argentinian fellow and this interview seems no longer to be available, so what's going on?

  • @thomasho4825
    @thomasho4825 3 місяці тому

    I remember Hong Kong still under Chinese government security law. Another word has a steel one country two system.

  • @Nauda999
    @Nauda999 3 місяці тому

    While the Sun shines everywhere, there are places like Egypt that has clear sky and long days almost all year long, and then there are many countries that have short summer where days are longer, and most of these days have clouds which significantly reduces energy produces.

  • @icf6830
    @icf6830 3 місяці тому

    The reference to China as water is sport-on. Remember Bruce Lee said: “ Be like water…”

  • @TheWerelf
    @TheWerelf 3 місяці тому

    People who are concerned with weak currency are either those who invested in that currency in FX or/and those who travel or import stuff.

  • @goodphone156
    @goodphone156 3 місяці тому

    But will be possible that China always wjn ?!

  • @gelinrefira
    @gelinrefira 3 місяці тому

    It's not a war.

  • @karenhodges7545
    @karenhodges7545 3 місяці тому +1

    Transition ti stuff ti make a few rolls ch and litter the landscape

  • @junli6065
    @junli6065 3 місяці тому +1

    Which Chinese dynasty changed because the last emperor got poisoned?

  • @hermanhsu5994
    @hermanhsu5994 3 місяці тому +1

    The barter economy is to come back, the exchange of international trades will be on tangibles like metals, grains, oils, meats, ....etc. and fiat money as needed.