You read my mind, I'm currently debating between these two exactly. I really love the understated, rugged design of the Pelagos, but the MM300 has many more interesting surfaces that play with the light and change hue depending on how light hits it. Not just in the dial and bezel, but all around the case as well. I'm afraid the Pelagos might not be very interesting to look at after a while because it's all matte all the time.
I think it's a matter of preference if you want an elegant diver that feels luxurious then get the marinemaster or the seamaster ceramic but if you want an understated tool watch get the Pelagos
marinemaster has no rival! I currently have a rolex ceramic submariner, I had a professional ceramic seamaster 300! and currently I also have a Planet ocean! and what the marinemaster transmits to me has not made any clock! it is wonderful the finished the box, the structure a magnificent piece! for me in its segment it has no rival
some say the Orient saturation diver is close to the mm300 quality wise and really shines pre loved as it's half the price of a pre loved mm300. cheers
mulberrybush1967 filmfan! I have not seen that piece in the metal and Ike it apart from the lower reserve indicator on the dial. The magic of the MM300 is a bug once bitten, is hard to forget.
+Jatthew Mackson I have a black dial osd coming in. It's the power reserve indicator I really like, makes it different to most other diver plus it's solid build. I got it for £610 with a extra strapcode bracelet with ratcheting clasp with it. mm300 pre loved is next for me. pre loved mm 300's in the uk seem to run around £1,400 pre loved. Cheers
I think the Marinemaster is outclassed in every way here. On the Pelagos you get an in-house movement with a 70 hour power reserve, all titanium construction, matte ceramic bezel with awesome gimping for solid control, the stepping on the dynamic dial, a COSC certification, all while flowing together seamlessly. The Marinemaster is very blocky looking, cheesy looking band, dial and bezel. The dial is too small while the bezel and case is too big. Not good flow and form. For the money you get Rolex fit and finish with some materials they don’t even use on their Subs. I personally can’t stand Rolex Subs, but for some reason the Pelagos is a working mans watch that has a classy look.
Great review and photography work. These MM-300 reviews finally persuaded me to get one. I have a Rolex Ceramic so the Tudor would have been redundant, but if I did not have the Rolex and had to choose between the MarineMaster and Pelagos, that would have been a tough decision. Tudor has really upped their game in the last few years. The Seiko MM-300 is a great value in premium divers. Only wish they'd have used a sapphire crystal instead of mineral glass at that price point. The size also worried me but it actually wears much smaller in real life. The Pelagos appears larger in diameter when held side by side but the calipers tell the true story.
evan h Thanks for your comments and I agree with what you say. I used to have a non date 14060M but since owning the Pelagos I find it impossible to justify almost double the price for a sub. Best regards.
Great comparison. Have watched this video before. Currently own a MM300 and have been considering the Tudor LHD for a couple years. I'm a lefty, so I keep going back to wanting one. Thanks for the review.
I just bought the new Marine Master 300 SBDX023 from my trip to Japan, also known as the SLA021. such a beutiful watch, very happy with my purchase. The new model has ceramic zerconium bezel and sapphire crystal glass from the hardlex of this model.
I have Tudor heritage 41 and marine master sla21 and marine master is better in everything although it constantly loses 6 seconds a day it compares and probably beats the submariner too it just has so much value.
@Uno Bassman somewhat inspired but not a copy of a sub, by your logic any dive watch with a black dial, black bezel and round hour markers are copies of a submariner. The marinemaster is different enough from a sub due to the following: crown @ 4 o'clock, monoblock case, hands designs that are different and imo far more refined from the submariner's hands with its brushed and angled polished finish.
@Uno Bassman oh and another thing, even though the marinemaster's bezel is not a ceramic bezel but seiko came up with the glossy bezel look since the year 2000, rolex only came up with the glossy bezel in 2007-08 when they changed to a ceramic bezel. So is rolex copying seiko's glossy bezel look as well???
@Uno Bassman in a way it is but to me it's different enough, remember that the mm300 came out in 2000-01 which did not look too much like the pre-ceramic sub. It does look like the SubC but the SubC only came out in 2007-08. Compare the submariner from the era with which the mm300 was launched, i.e. submariner 16610 vs the sbdx001, they're quite different imo. The seamaster bond from the same era apart from the blue color actually look more like a submariner.
@Uno Bassman I have both and I don't see a subbie at all when I look at the MM300, which is very obviously NOT a subbie. Don't know what filters you're looking at it through.
@@lettuce1305 The current MM300, though the "marinemaster" name has been removed from the dial, now sports a ceramic bezel, sapphire crystal (unfortunately) and a couple of internal improvements as well.
Excellent video. The MM300 is a very interesting watch. It's big, but, looks small, even, in my 6.25" wrist. The crafter blue strap is perfectly made for this watch. Absolutely transformed. So easy and comfortable to wear. Rugged and look different.
I think we can all agree that these are two fantastic watches and purley down to personal preference which to buy. I already own this Seiko and I know that you would have missed it. i would never sell mine and it will be passed down to my son. I am also considering the Pelagos to add to my collection however my choice would be the beautiful blue colour with standard crown.
The blue version Pelagos is my favorite, I would really struggle to buy the MM300 over it, and I love Seiko and pretty much despise everything about Rolex.
It’s a shame that Pelagos’ seem to lose value, whereas Rolexes only seem to go up. The Tudor strikes me as a modern and better interpretation of the Submariner. I think some people aren’t ready for titanium at the higher end of watches, although, they do mark rather easier than Stainless steel, I guess and that might be the issue.
@@itsallrobbish it's all because of brand image, many people buy a rolex just because it says rolex on the dial. Don't get me wrong, rolex makes fantastic watches but quality wise they're not 2-3x better than a tudor yet 2-3x the price.
I greatly prefer the Seiko, but, I do like this titanium Tudor; it has its own character, and a good one at that. It's the first one that doesn't scream "buy ME if you can't afford a Rolex!"
Excellent! Came here searching for this comparison - it occurred to me, if I had "higher end" watches like the Tudor, would I even need to add the Seiko MM300 to my collection? Well damn it, I think I will! Want SLA017 too..... dang.
Great video- I currently own the sbdx017 and have been tempted to sell it for the blue Pelagos but I worry the titanium will not age as well as steel. Although the mm300 is polished and brushed so beautifully I feel like it will age well and scratches and marks will improve it, not so sure on the Pelagos... but I love the Matt blue dial and bezel... decisions decisions. Thanks for your informative video anyway, you’ve made me reconsider the Tudor watch 🤦🏻♂️😁
FatSamEIE thanks for your comment. I don't find that the Pelagos scratches that bad. If you love the mm300 then trust me don't sell it and save for the Pelagos. I love the Pelagos and for the money it is the best out there.
Jatthew Mackson cheers mate will do- everyone I know(or more accurately who I’ve seen on the internet) who has sold their mm300 has either re-bought it or regretted it so I think you’re right. I clearly need a blue and a black diver... right?😁
@@FatSamEIE i wouldn't sell the mm300 if i were you especially if it's the sbdx001/017 as they're discontinued now. And yes i regretted selling my sbdx001 and have re-bought it.
@@krit5339 I guess how overpriced it is for for a ridiculously thick 300m water resistant watch with an unadjusted movement.I only mentioned the Pelagos in my original comment, but neither is the MM.
@@БојанПавловић-е3й As per your anecdote, my 200 USD Orient Ray is also unadjusted, and keeps as good time as any Marine Master. That makes it legendary as well.
I just watched your NDC strap video and was wondering when the heck you got another MM300. I haven’t watch this video yet but will soon and I’m looking forward to it. Congrats on the rebuy and new arrival.
I have a pelagos LHD, the bezel is slightly out at 12oclock and actually stopped working for no good reason after 3 years. it was still under warranty and was fixed immediately. I caught my pelagos on my door handle in my bedroom after 6months of ownership. Wasn’t best pleased with myself. Now I don’t have a marine master, but looking at the sheer thickness of its case id be catching that everywhere I went. The pelagos is a beautiful watch to wear and admire however the finishing on the seiko is real treat on the eyes. To other marine master owners, how does the large case wear on your wrists taking your own wrist size into account?
MM300 no doubt. It will be hard for me to keep the Pelagos because Seiko is just a better watch overall. I'd sell Tudor and get a nice chronograph or a pilots watch of the same price.
Even at the currently elevated prices of the Prospex/MM300, it's still a great bargain relative to most watches. Frankly, I think they should just offer it only on the rubber strap and drop the price a few hundred bucks.
My only problem with the marine master is it ridiculously thick. I know it’s not actually that much thicker then the Tudor but it wears wayyyyy thicker. I tried one on it felt like it was an inch off my wrist
I fail to agree with you. The bottom half of the case just melts into your arm so it wears like a watch that is half or 2/3 at most as thick as it really is. When you initially try it on it might jolt you if you are used to thin watches but after a day or two your eyes realize the watch wears significantly smaller and thinner than it is. In fact, it wears like a slightly chunky 40 mil watch. There is a perfection to how the design elements just work together to provide a very exceptional ergonomic effect that is not easily comparable to anything else. It also has another kind of magic in that it reflects every Seiko diver you’ve ever owned back to you. I won’t compare it but I will say that Seiko has created a masterpiece to honor its lineage that stands on its own league beyond comparison. The watch is a profesional diver’s dream and it is all about that business. It is mesmerizing, subtle, subdued and yet boldly in your face.
Pelagos is the only decent Tudor... the rest feel like Rolex homages - which cheapens them to me. The Pelagos bracelet is my favorite on any watch. The LHD is great looking and I would love it since I can't stand crown bite on the back of my hand. MM300 is just too heavy and clunky for me - albeit I love the look and respect it's place in horology.
I like the Seiko more... but no way I'm spending $2,000 on a Seiko. I enjoy my Seiko Monster, Turtle, and SBDC051... but the new SLA021/SBDX023 is selling new for $3,000... insane.
Seiko is a vertically integrated company. You can buy a $100 Seiko 5 or a $2000 Seiko MM300 or a Grand Seiko diver. To each their own, but I actually enjoy that. The fit and finish (as well as the movement) are superb and the average Joe or criminal will be none the wiser about whats on wrist. A watch lover (the demographic for these pieces) would give props seeing this on anyones wrist.
i've been thinking about a MM300 for a long time now... if they just made it 1-1,5mm thinner, it would've already been mine years ago. but that behemoth is sooo weird looking on my small wrist :( but i want one so bad, goddamnit
LHD all the way (Original design from the same company, awesome Marina Nationale history). Seiko looks amazing but i don't like homages (People should accept what happened in 1953 with Rolex and Blancpain, after those designs the rest are homages).
The pelagos just looks so pedestrian compared directly to an MM300, its like parking a golf next to a Porsche. The golf may be a better tool but which would you rather own?
Mm300 for sure
I’d pick the Marine Master all day long 👍🏻
You read my mind, I'm currently debating between these two exactly. I really love the understated, rugged design of the Pelagos, but the MM300 has many more interesting surfaces that play with the light and change hue depending on how light hits it. Not just in the dial and bezel, but all around the case as well. I'm afraid the Pelagos might not be very interesting to look at after a while because it's all matte all the time.
I think it's a matter of preference if you want an elegant diver that feels luxurious then get the marinemaster or the seamaster ceramic but if you want an understated tool watch get the Pelagos
Did you get any bits falling off the pelagos?
marinemaster has no rival! I currently have a rolex ceramic submariner, I had a professional ceramic seamaster 300! and currently I also have a Planet ocean! and what the marinemaster transmits to me has not made any clock! it is wonderful the finished the box, the structure a magnificent piece! for me in its segment it has no rival
I AGREE!!!
some say the Orient saturation diver is close to the mm300 quality wise and really shines pre loved as it's half the price of a pre loved mm300. cheers
mulberrybush1967 filmfan! I have not seen that piece in the metal and Ike it apart from the lower reserve indicator on the dial. The magic of the MM300 is a bug once bitten, is hard to forget.
+Jatthew Mackson I have a black dial osd coming in. It's the power reserve indicator I really like, makes it different to most other diver plus it's solid build. I got it for £610 with a extra strapcode bracelet with ratcheting clasp with it. mm300 pre loved is next for me. pre loved mm 300's in the uk seem to run around £1,400 pre loved. Cheers
I think the Marinemaster is outclassed in every way here. On the Pelagos you get an in-house movement with a 70 hour power reserve, all titanium construction, matte ceramic bezel with awesome gimping for solid control, the stepping on the dynamic dial, a COSC certification, all while flowing together seamlessly. The Marinemaster is very blocky looking, cheesy looking band, dial and bezel. The dial is too small while the bezel and case is too big. Not good flow and form. For the money you get Rolex fit and finish with some materials they don’t even use on their Subs. I personally can’t stand Rolex Subs, but for some reason the Pelagos is a working mans watch that has a classy look.
Great review and photography work. These MM-300 reviews finally persuaded me to get one. I have a Rolex Ceramic so the Tudor would have been redundant, but if I did not have the Rolex and had to choose between the MarineMaster and Pelagos, that would have been a tough decision. Tudor has really upped their game in the last few years. The Seiko MM-300 is a great value in premium divers. Only wish they'd have used a sapphire crystal instead of mineral glass at that price point. The size also worried me but it actually wears much smaller in real life. The Pelagos appears larger in diameter when held side by side but the calipers tell the true story.
evan h Thanks for your comments and I agree with what you say. I used to have a non date 14060M but since owning the Pelagos I find it impossible to justify almost double the price for a sub. Best regards.
Great comparison. Have watched this video before. Currently own a MM300 and have been considering the Tudor LHD for a couple years. I'm a lefty, so I keep going back to wanting one. Thanks for the review.
Thanks for your kind comments. I still have the Pelagos LHD and have had a few MM300's amongst many other watches.
I just bought the new Marine Master 300 SBDX023 from my trip to Japan, also known as the SLA021. such a beutiful watch, very happy with my purchase. The new model has ceramic zerconium bezel and sapphire crystal glass from the hardlex of this model.
Alex Carydis nice. Aren't the hands different too?
@@HammerK99 yes, the second hand is gold now, also the bezel illuminates to the 20 minute mark.
how u feeling about the prospex logo instead of the MM text?
What is the price of 021 in Japan?
I don't mind the prospect logo. The price I purchased it at was equivalent to $3200AUD which is currently around $2500USD.
I have Tudor heritage 41 and marine master sla21 and marine master is better in everything although it constantly loses 6 seconds a day it compares and probably beats the submariner too it just has so much value.
marine master is the most beautiful diver every made , Seiko have nailed it and they will milk this design like Rolex milk it's Sub.
@Uno Bassman somewhat inspired but not a copy of a sub, by your logic any dive watch with a black dial, black bezel and round hour markers are copies of a submariner. The marinemaster is different enough from a sub due to the following: crown @ 4 o'clock, monoblock case, hands designs that are different and imo far more refined from the submariner's hands with its brushed and angled polished finish.
@Uno Bassman oh and another thing, even though the marinemaster's bezel is not a ceramic bezel but seiko came up with the glossy bezel look since the year 2000, rolex only came up with the glossy bezel in 2007-08 when they changed to a ceramic bezel. So is rolex copying seiko's glossy bezel look as well???
@Uno Bassman in a way it is but to me it's different enough, remember that the mm300 came out in 2000-01 which did not look too much like the pre-ceramic sub. It does look like the SubC but the SubC only came out in 2007-08. Compare the submariner from the era with which the mm300 was launched, i.e. submariner 16610 vs the sbdx001, they're quite different imo. The seamaster bond from the same era apart from the blue color actually look more like a submariner.
@Uno Bassman I have both and I don't see a subbie at all when I look at the MM300, which is very obviously NOT a subbie. Don't know what filters you're looking at it through.
@@lettuce1305 The current MM300, though the "marinemaster" name has been removed from the dial, now sports a ceramic bezel, sapphire crystal (unfortunately) and a couple of internal improvements as well.
Excellent video. The MM300 is a very interesting watch. It's big, but, looks small, even, in my 6.25" wrist. The crafter blue strap is perfectly made for this watch. Absolutely transformed. So easy and comfortable to wear. Rugged and look different.
I've owned several since this video and no they have all gone, even the Pelagos!
@@goldtoothjacko several MM300? Gone where?
@@canonyeo4286 sold and gone to new homes!
@@goldtoothjacko oh, you are a retailer. Nice
@@canonyeo4286 no just a collector!
Marine master all the way
Pelagos any day of the week, and twice on Sunday.
I think we can all agree that these are two fantastic watches and purley down to personal preference which to buy. I already own this Seiko and I know that you would have missed it. i would never sell mine and it will be passed down to my son. I am also considering the Pelagos to add to my collection however my choice would be the beautiful blue colour with standard crown.
i like the tudor more for the amount of features in the clasp alone! Its amazing these cost WAY WAY less than a Sub. Def the one Id buy.
The blue version Pelagos is my favorite, I would really struggle to buy the MM300 over it, and I love Seiko and pretty much despise everything about Rolex.
It’s a shame that Pelagos’ seem to lose value, whereas Rolexes only seem to go up. The Tudor strikes me as a modern and better interpretation of the Submariner. I think some people aren’t ready for titanium at the higher end of watches, although, they do mark rather easier than Stainless steel, I guess and that might be the issue.
@@itsallrobbish it's all because of brand image, many people buy a rolex just because it says rolex on the dial. Don't get me wrong, rolex makes fantastic watches but quality wise they're not 2-3x better than a tudor yet 2-3x the price.
@@lettuce1305 mrsp is 2x the price but since Rolex plays the hard to get game the prices in gray market become 2.5x or 3x times. Sick game I reckon.
I’ve got both as you have Michael.Love them both the same,excellent watches.
I greatly prefer the Seiko, but, I do like this titanium Tudor; it has its own character, and a good one at that. It's the first one that doesn't scream "buy ME if you can't afford a Rolex!"
My two favorite watches! Awesome!
Excellent! Came here searching for this comparison - it occurred to me, if I had "higher end" watches like the Tudor, would I even need to add the Seiko MM300 to my collection?
Well damn it, I think I will! Want SLA017 too..... dang.
Great video- I currently own the sbdx017 and have been tempted to sell it for the blue Pelagos but I worry the titanium will not age as well as steel. Although the mm300 is polished and brushed so beautifully I feel like it will age well and scratches and marks will improve it, not so sure on the Pelagos... but I love the Matt blue dial and bezel... decisions decisions. Thanks for your informative video anyway, you’ve made me reconsider the Tudor watch 🤦🏻♂️😁
FatSamEIE thanks for your comment. I don't find that the Pelagos scratches that bad. If you love the mm300 then trust me don't sell it and save for the Pelagos. I love the Pelagos and for the money it is the best out there.
Jatthew Mackson cheers mate will do- everyone I know(or more accurately who I’ve seen on the internet) who has sold their mm300 has either re-bought it or regretted it so I think you’re right. I clearly need a blue and a black diver... right?😁
@@FatSamEIE i wouldn't sell the mm300 if i were you especially if it's the sbdx001/017 as they're discontinued now. And yes i regretted selling my sbdx001 and have re-bought it.
You produce very good content, keep doing it!
Well that is very kind of you of you're being serious but it was just a bit of fun and I am shocked so many people have viewed it!
This is a really good vid. Well done
Thank you
The Pelagos has quite a long way to go before it is considered legendary!
I'm genuinely curious, what makes the MM300 lengendary?
@@krit5339 I guess how overpriced it is for for a ridiculously thick 300m water resistant watch with an unadjusted movement.I only mentioned the Pelagos in my original comment, but neither is the MM.
@@БојанПавловић-е3й As per your anecdote, my 200 USD Orient Ray is also unadjusted, and keeps as good time as any Marine Master. That makes it legendary as well.
got my lhd few days ago...and putting my 116710 in the safe today. thx for the review.
Pelagos for me! Such a better strap and an understated tool watch!
Fantastic comparison
Thank you.
I absolutely love the lume on my Pelagos LHD, the lumed bezel is amazing and the roulette date is great too.
I just watched your NDC strap video and was wondering when the heck you got another MM300. I haven’t watch this video yet but will soon and I’m looking forward to it. Congrats on the rebuy and new arrival.
Rob Couch I just got the MM300 this week! I missed it! Enjoy the video. Best regards.
No doubt MM300 all the way...
I prefer The Tudor Pelagos LHD with a rubber strap .
I have a pelagos LHD, the bezel is slightly out at 12oclock and actually stopped working for no good reason after 3 years. it was still under warranty and was fixed immediately.
I caught my pelagos on my door handle in my bedroom after 6months of ownership.
Wasn’t best pleased with myself.
Now I don’t have a marine master, but looking at the sheer thickness of its case id be catching that everywhere I went.
The pelagos is a beautiful watch to wear and admire however the finishing on the seiko is real treat on the eyes.
To other marine master owners, how does the large case wear on your wrists taking your own wrist size into account?
It wear a lot smaller than you think it should.
Marine Master looks better.
MM300 no doubt. It will be hard for me to keep the Pelagos because Seiko is just a better watch overall. I'd sell Tudor and get a nice chronograph or a pilots watch of the same price.
Great review thanks. For me I'm afraid the MM was just waay too top heavy. Flopped around on my wrist and kept hitting things. Cheers
Thank you for making a detailed comparison.
Even at the currently elevated prices of the Prospex/MM300, it's still a great bargain relative to most watches. Frankly, I think they should just offer it only on the rubber strap and drop the price a few hundred bucks.
Why does everyone say that the clasp on the MM300 is Titanium? On the back of mine, it is clearly stamped Stainless Steel -B.
Love the Tudor lhd
I love seiko, but in this case I love tudor even more.
Tudor looks stamped 🙄
Seiko looks scarpltured 🤗🤗
My only problem with the marine master is it ridiculously thick. I know it’s not actually that much thicker then the Tudor but it wears wayyyyy thicker. I tried one on it felt like it was an inch off my wrist
I fail to agree with you. The bottom half of the case just melts into your arm so it wears like a watch that is half or 2/3 at most as thick as it really is. When you initially try it on it might jolt you if you are used to thin watches but after a day or two your eyes realize the watch wears significantly smaller and thinner than it is. In fact, it wears like a slightly chunky 40 mil watch. There is a perfection to how the design elements just work together to provide a very exceptional ergonomic effect that is not easily comparable to anything else. It also has another kind of magic in that it reflects every Seiko diver you’ve ever owned back to you. I won’t compare it but I will say that Seiko has created a masterpiece to honor its lineage that stands on its own league beyond comparison. The watch is a profesional diver’s dream and it is all about that business. It is mesmerizing, subtle, subdued and yet boldly in your face.
that seiko is huge
No, it is not. It is a small watch on the wrist, and that is the design Genius of it.
So which one has strong lume? the Seiko actually looked brighter? But I keep hearing the pelagos is #1
This is a tough one. Probably MM cuz of the price.
Tudor all the way !!! I own one its tank 💪
Pelagos is the only decent Tudor... the rest feel like Rolex homages - which cheapens them to me. The Pelagos bracelet is my favorite on any watch. The LHD is great looking and I would love it since I can't stand crown bite on the back of my hand. MM300 is just too heavy and clunky for me - albeit I love the look and respect it's place in horology.
Shipmate Tudor and Rolex are from the same company and they have been borrowing designs since the 50s..
Seiko for sure
I have the MM300 and am looking at the Tudor. Do you feel the Tudor wears much larger than the Marinemaster?
I like the Seiko more... but no way I'm spending $2,000 on a Seiko. I enjoy my Seiko Monster, Turtle, and SBDC051... but the new SLA021/SBDX023 is selling new for $3,000... insane.
Seiko is a vertically integrated company. You can buy a $100 Seiko 5 or a $2000 Seiko MM300 or a Grand Seiko diver. To each their own, but I actually enjoy that. The fit and finish (as well as the movement) are superb and the average Joe or criminal will be none the wiser about whats on wrist. A watch lover (the demographic for these pieces) would give props seeing this on anyones wrist.
If u can only keep one, which would u choose?
The MM300
Nice video, thanks. What is the weight of the watches? Thanks.
i've been thinking about a MM300 for a long time now... if they just made it 1-1,5mm thinner, it would've already been mine years ago. but that behemoth is sooo weird looking on my small wrist :( but i want one so bad, goddamnit
The Pelagos dial looks much bigger.
Couldnt afford both so i bought a Doxa
I LIKE TUDOR just coz i hate polished on the watches all brushed is way better looking.
Why the tudor lookd bigger ?
The MM300 is nice but the Pelagos for the easy win.
mm300 for me
Seiko's bezel is way too thick at the edge for my liking.....also the dial looks too small like many Seikos......
Each to their own
good taste good sir
LHD all the way (Original design from the same company, awesome Marina Nationale history). Seiko looks amazing but i don't like homages (People should accept what happened in 1953 with Rolex and Blancpain, after those designs the rest are homages).
Why don't you send me that Tudor!!!
Jeremy Corrao because I'd never see it again!
Jatthew Mackson haha!! 😂😂
Seiko MM300 > Tudor Pelagos
Tudor is rubbish... even the date is not calibrated.
Lol ....Ya , Tudor sure is garbage.....Not sure how they get away selling such crap!
Well coz Tudor is related to overpriced Rolex junk, that’s how they getting their sales.
@@Mint-cb2vc I gotta third gen 40mm squale ceramic on now the latest mk3.. Can not believe the quality for the price.. Rivals my seamaster easily.
The pelagos just looks so pedestrian compared directly to an MM300, its like parking a golf next to a Porsche. The golf may be a better tool but which would you rather own?