Given the numerous requests for more evidence, we have created a second video that presents a wealth of supporting material. We hope this will satisfy your inquiries and demonstrate that the Mahabharata is not just fiction. ua-cam.com/video/UJpEbaAraS4/v-deo.html
@@huzaifaattarwala9615 The Tectonic Plate and the Ocean where the subcontinent rests is called Indian. Fun Fact: The name India existed even before Islam came to earth and the 'countries' in the Indian Subcontinent were created by the British. The geographic region of Indian Subcontinent will always be addressed as Indian subcontinent.
@@adityasundar324 Yes, India word is derived from our River Indus. Indus was named by the Greeks, the outsiders. Thousands of years back there was no India, not geographically nor as a political entity.
@huzaifaattarwala9615 India is the term given to the Indian subcontinent. Period. It is like saying there was no America before the Europeans came. India has been called Bharat time immemorial. India / Bharat is a geographical area and not a political identity. There is absolutely no necessity to appease anyone. Like it or not, it is the Indian subcontinent.
Excellent and correct explanation - Mahabharat and Ramayana are History (Itihaas) not mythology and every Indian needs to know it in detail।and spread this news worldwide. Just look at all these evidences from archaeology, climatology, geography, genetics, religious traditions, astronomy
It upsets me that archeology concentrates on ancient Egypt, Roman and Greek, the Mayas and the Incas, Great Britain and so on. I’ve never heard of nor seen any talk or documentary about India. Why is it so? Thank you for this vid. Very uplifting.
If its from Bharat and Sanatan Dharma Hide it Thats the communist Marxist philosophy If Bharateeya philiosphybis freely available theres no ground for bith Capitalist mechanisms like patents will become reduntant and ao will communism
It is not a myth... But myth was introduced in it deliberately... To make it look like a myth i think you got it right... Read the og version of mahabharat... Jaya samhita... Its really has the history though.
@@Pontiff03 colonialism racist mentality of the ones who poisoned the world with the myth thing. Let's give Bharat it's true due of respect. Jai Bharata 🕉️
@@Jamuna-Atma I don't give a fk about the colonials... What my perception of reality shows truth to me... is something that I believe in... Because I trust myself and I am rational... Mahabharat's Jaya Samhita was History... people were normal... they had fortified cities, had their set of problems and rejections... People created fan fanctions of Mahabharat and Ramayan, to make them seem anime with plot... Supernatural powers. Humans... will never have supernatural powers... because we have no trace of it's existence... nor did the person who actually wrote down the alternative series knows anything about it... It's just a piece of imagination... that was carved, and now the people of India Thinks It's History... as they can't seem to see the true light that I see. They never question the intention of the author... why is the way it is supposed to be, the origins. All the Indian Mythical stories from Puranas, give explanation to the events of the mainstream stories, which absolutely lacks any details... and in certain case feels Hollow and Incomplete, and the whole crux, feels kind of hopeless to me.
@@riddunyra4373 you a hole ... You're a fooder kid... I am talking about the goddamn events that took place... In Mahabharat were real... War was real... But the superhuman concept, the unnatural birth from gods... Are all bullshit... This is why I told everyone to read og Mahabharat version Jaya samhita, which contains original version of Mahabharat... You need to read between lines ... Batman's helicopter.
And we call ourselves modern generation......still can't able to find why the iron pillar of ancient India doesn't rust....and you are expecting to find the technology used at that time periods and also after burning the historical and scientific records recorded and preserved in one of worlds largest libraries....Nalanda.. 😅😅
@@MahabharatUntoldStories-up7rv Please consider doing it in order of the book. There is a great need for this story to be told. My knowledge of the story is very limited hence I am and many others are looking to understand it better. I suggest do it academically translating from Sanskrit at first. Then draw on the various sages commentaries. Its a huge task.
Hey everyone! I just want to say a big thank you for all your comments and support. I've started a new video series on the Mahabharata, focusing on how its characters can inspire personal growth and improve our lives. I believe this series can truly benefit everyone, here is the link, let me know what you think :) ua-cam.com/video/mrZNowFnozU/v-deo.html
Mahabharat war negates Aryan invasion. Infact after the devastating Mahabharat war Vedic Aryans migrated from India. Mahabharat war was plan of Bhagvan Krishna to lessen burden of earth.
That obviously didn't work. Indians are still "overburdening" the earth by their mass-birthing (making a billion babies) and migrating to every other country. Kalki will now have to come and subdue them. 😢
Just because a ruler/leader is female doesn't mean the society is matriarchal. Vast majority of men who die in war are mostly poor soldiers..the ones who can royally ascend a position only makes less than top 1%.
It happened in a different Space-time (yuga) dimension in the multiverse (Brahmhanda). And the event has been recorded in CBRE later , the event is decoded by the yogic masters.
It is said that kakabhushundi has seen different ramayanas 11 times and different mahabharatas 16 tumes in different versions. That means every cycle of 4 yugas ramayana and Mahabharata will be enacted. If everything us written abd will take place as per plan then what is their to judge right or wrong.
Possible, but coincidence does not necessarily equal causation. But I do believe that the ancient Vedic cultures were instrumental in shaping many belief systems and practices throughout the world.
always wondered if, india was so advanced during 4000-5000 BC.,when mahabharat and ramayan happened that things could fly etc,,,,then how come no one figured out writing at the time ..why no writing or paintings on walls etc. telling about the war stories....it was finally written down in 300 AD...how can someone remember stories accurately after 4000 years of passing down the story....its like if someone wrote about buddha's life today on basis of hear say passed to generations over 2500 years ...how accurate you can be??
@@evilgetsraw278124 as per hindu mythology the great flood happened much before Rama....and even if you consider another great flood wiping off civilization (western)...then that makes it even more absurd that some one will be able to write down the story after 5000 or so years later of any event that has no witnesses
@@sodea13 Hindus had a very advanced concept of Shruti and Smriti. They had learnt and memorized all the events and teachings of the past efficiently. When you look at ancient Indian temples(mostly in South India), you could see how advanced ancient Indians were. Today such temples are next to impossible to even think forget about erecting them.
No matter what anyone says, I believe in Indian legends and epics and it truly happened. As far as things about DNA and other facts it is being not very conclusive but rather confusing because in one video on UA-cam a Indian guy by the way of world population of that time and DNA evidence subtly suggested Mahabharata is just a story nothing else and Indian original population were of steppe herders who impregnated Indian women.
The so-called Neolithic Y-chromosome bottleneck is thought to have resulted from several battles and conflicts between various tribes worldwide rather than the Mahabharata conflict alone in India. This might be the result of social changes as opposed to environmental ones.
In the beginning, it has been stated that the war happened 7500 years ago. Then it has been stated that the Y-chromosome bottleneck occurred at the same time in South Asia. Which one does the narrator try to assume and which one does he intend to prove? The time of the war or the war really did happen? Has he any evidence that humans had a capacity to arrange for such a huge war 7500 years ago that according to his narrative collected soldiers from Syria to Indonesia? These kind of narratives are mere speculations which need to be presented modestly as heuristics instead of claiming those in an assertive way. Then only some further scope of discussion remains. Otherwise, these are considered by the rational mind as mere beliefs that have only entertainment value.
But we have to take under consideration the British & mughal invasions.... I would like to blame them that the real pages of mahabharat is extinct along with the followers of lokayat from that era, cuz yk everything has it's opposite like good has bad....Believer had non believers... Quiet controversial
Great video and I’ve seen Oak’s work. But somehow we don’t seem to have any chariots, weapons, or remains from the war at the site. It’s baffling why all the people who feel strongly haven’t asked for ASI to work on this. Plus, some aspects, like Ashwattama’s gem or Ghatotkacha’s abilities that turned the war make no sense. I’m a huge proponent of revival of those principles by inquiry but these points are somehow never addressed and cause people to consider it myth.
If you would have done some research, you would hv know that archaeologists have found remains of chariots & female vests (kavach) which dates back before Harappan civilization
No, there is a different between stories and history. Anyone can tell a story but in order for a story to become history, it must be backed up with accurate information and data which can be verified. A drunkard can claim he went to Mars - that is his story. Whether it become a history or not is depends whether he can verify it with proof. Otherwise he is just a drunkard.
Mahabharat war actually happened between the kuru clan but around 1000-900bc as per the archaeological findings. The stuff related to mahabharat was dated to belonging from the mahajanapada period of our history. The claims that mahabharat war happened 7500 or 5000 years ago are baseless, they don’t have any historical evidence.
Just because there are different theories and timelines regarding the Kurukshetra war doesn't mean it didn't happen. Historical events often have multiple interpretations due to varying evidence and perspectives. While the exact details of how and what occurred are subjects of ongoing debate, there is substantial evidence in ancient scriptures like the Mahabharata and other shastras supporting its significance. Faith plays an essential role in interpreting and understanding religious and cultural histories. Dismissing these accounts outright overlooks the rich heritage and the profound impact they have had on shaping society and culture. It's important to approach such topics with an open mind and consider the depth of evidence and faith that surrounds them.
@@MahabharatUntoldStories-up7rv exactly just because the time frame isnt clear we can’t outright deny the existence of this event. Literature architecture etc have always supported it that mahabharata war has happened at some point in time but there no concrete historical evidence of its “timeline”, i.e., when it happened. And as long as there is no concrete evidence of kurukshetra war this timeline debate will go on and everyone will present there own perspective on it
@@anshulmalviya5468how do you pin point that year. Archeological findings are insufficient to find actual dates. Have archeology unearthed each and every site possible. Have they done enough research. Only considering pot and pans, spear and arrow as evidence can't let you find real timeline of such historic events. There could have happened less significant wars in same areas which has not been mentioned anywhere in literary records. If you find weaponry for this less significant war. How can you definitely call it is related to Mahabharata. Archeology has its limitations and their timelines will keep changing as per new findings. Their insights are important in determining what kind of life people used to live, what rituals they performed, technology what they had,..........their findings are incredibly good but timeline decisions they make is very much inaccurate as that is bound to change as per findings. Literary data of astrology is available in Mahabharata epic. Once you run computer simulation as per condition mentioned in Mahabharata epic. You are bound to reach year around 5500bc. This gives you convincing match. Also City of Dwarka submerged in sea after some years of Mahabharata war as described in epic. Oceanographic data too supports the same conditions of rising sea level and then sea ports of Indus valley civilization lothal , balakot, sutkagen dor becoming a port is also established by same archeological findings. But if you visit these places today they are landlocked. There are many other significant evidences which are not dirt archeology based. But if you connect dots properly Mahabharata timeline goes far backward than what these pot pan people say 😆😆😆😆😆
🤨 😏 ancient aliens came together in this planet, to do what they did/do best, which is, to destroy "en masse". I wonder who/what created this mass negativity among living creatures?😢And for what reason?
Iron was found around 1000 BC in india for the first time during post vedic period to made weapons. Mahajanpadas came into existence in 600 BC and u want us to believe that Mahabharata and ramayana happened within 400 years?
if something is found for the first time in a region doesn't mean it is the be all and end all of things found there. It doesn't mean things cannot be older than that. Knowledge can be lost and so can be evidence, and most evidence is lost. Archaeologists used to believe our civilisation was 2000 years, then it became 5000 years from parts of Indus Valley, now the latest evidence in Harappa points to 9000 years old. One reason why I believe archaeology is such an imprecise science!
Because of War Rules. Both army must use similar weapons, astra and vehicles in order to be considered a dharmic (righteous) war. Thos with spear will attack those with spears, swordmen vs swordmen, archers vs archers etc. Use of Astras are the only exception here because even so the astra are aimed at specific individual, it can have area-effect which kills others around (like the infamous Brahmastra). As for vimanas, throughout Mahabratha epic, very little people actually used vimana as tool which may indicate that the use of vimana in war during that time was forbidden as it could lead to unfair advantage to one group.
@@GobiSubramaniam you kinda are saying what I cleas concluding with the stuff I know. Thank you for your indepth information. It was very insightful. Hari Om
@@Jamuna-Atma - Did you notice that during Mahabratha times, there was very little people who actually flew, except maybe the Gods like Hanuman? In Ramayana times, Ravana and his son, Indrajit both used vimana in battles and Sri Rama (and Laksamana) both had to devise means of detecting and destroying aerial vehicles similar to Surface to Air missiles we have today. Perhaps the technology of Vimana itself had been lost at the time of Mahabratha which may explain why there were no vimanas used.
Even in modern warfare armies use tanks and vehicles although there are fighter jets, the reason is cost and effectiveness. In Mahabharata times warfare was carried out with values i.e they believed in 1:1 combat and the combatants were in close proximity to each other. Imagine using a fighter jet on an area where you have both yours and opposing armies.
❤🌊 ➕ merci Beaucoups for sharing 👐 🖐!✨ Cher soulsolidarity sacred sisters brothers with gratitude love respect from Indigo from Lyra namaste 🙏 peace ✌ Goddess galactique cosmoschristia dharmakaya world's within 🗺 without end 🌟 ketharic El ayin Soph Aur EL-SHADDAI universalitia 🌌 🏆 🔹 💕
not thinking it can be conformed mahabharath and ramayan is myth, what is the period of treta yuva chathur yuga , its near to 9 laksh years before ramayan and archeology says its 5000 years before , and same for mahabharatha , 20 ,000years before there were only naga people in full india speaking only tamil language , and nagas and mayans seperated from india according to ambedkar research, and nepal prime minister said rama is born in nepal with evidence , so dont portrait ramayana and mahabharath is fact its only myth always .
I dont know if u will take this comment seriously...still... Lord Krishna is the fabled King David (Dawood in Islam) of Israel..his Capital was in Judah..from which we get the clan "Jadu Bangsha". Nation of Israel later got divided into two kingdoms and these two factions clashed against each other. The "Star of David'" depicted on the flag of present Israel is The "Sudarshan Chakra" of Lord Krishna. After the war the defeated faction (Kurus)moved to southern side (Present Arabia)..from the Kurus, came the "Koraesh" Clan of Arabia Mecca...and You know from which Arabic Clan did come Mohammad(PBUH), Prophet of Islam..rings a bell?... Nation of Israel later got conquared and vandalised by Babylonians..just what happened to Jadus after passing of Lord Krishna(they did not mention babylon, they mentioned barbaric aggresive people in Mahabharata taking away the ladies of Jadus from the protection of Arjuna).. The last hint...have you heatd of Psalms of David?..in Islam, the book that was given to Dawood (King David) is called "Jabur" and the meaning of the word "Jabur" is Music or "Geet" in Sangskrit.."Geeta".."Bhagabat Geeta" = Music from God.. Israel= Isra+ El = Ishwar+ Aloy = House of God. The Whole Sindhis, Punjabis, Kashmiris, Rajputs, Pathans = Lost tribes of Israel... Time line of King David = 1000 BC I have lot more to hint at...i wish i could put them in this one comment...Jews are lost brothers of Indians, specially North Indians.
Arrey bhai naam tera Pritam hai, ulti kahani bata raha hai, Islam ki koi history nahi hai woh jews aur christian se copy pasted hai aur jo purani arabia ki pagan religions thi unhi ki stories hain yeh flow hai knowledge ka. Sanatan -> Judaism -> Christianity -> Islam
But the narayani sena it self had 10 million warrior how could there be only 20 million people that time . Maybe your prediction us wrong. Or the truth is Mahabharata is a fiction.
Bhai itihas pdho yarr tum. Mtlb I can't tell you in the comment on how many accounts you are wrong. Arz kiya hai, "tum aana poori zindagi le kr k kbhi fhir bataunga ki tumhari galati kya thi?"
Well done My friend 👏 Brilliant and on top of it How did it start from a insult 🤔 which then lead to Conflict and because the 5 brothers marrying 1 women is a very bad notions and sound very disturbing. On top of this all these So called Power Teacher Kings holy Men sat on there Seats while a Man grabbed a women from her hair for the insulting remark she made and brought her stripping to his brother Kings Court in front of her husband who used her as a Gambling 🎰 piece no worth no dignity no honour no justice And were on there knees in till a spiritual God covered her. Sets a bad tone for a population that women are like treated worse then Animals and justice ⚖️ is very lacking.
nilesh himself got wrong history, watch janaki ram telugu cosmic youtube channel to know when this happened exactly directly from the inscriptions of Mahabharat and Bhagavadgita from Archaeological evidences, and astronimical evidences. Nilesh Oak is a good writer but not good researcher.
Maha bharata war is true but only in india north region it was there. Were from all India. Previous pakistan. Bangladesh may have fought kings . But not from north eastern china jsoan korea. Hongkong. Singapore. Or African Cambodia. Morocco Egypt etc .this is fake
Mahabharatha is just a mythical exaggeration of war, that happened between 2 opposing divisions formed out of mahajanapadas. The literary form of mahabharatha and ramayana came into existence because of the greek influence at the mauryan period
We cant fully make every scene historical and evidenced . We just have a narrative book snd we cant verify each sequence happened or not . We generally know the war occurred. It wasnt world war but mostly regional war as it occurred only in ancient india. We cant question the author nor the book now. Anyway i have no use it war occurred or not but the present time. I am not living in the past with krishna or ram but in the now without any of them. My job is to live my life truthfully. It doesnt even matter krishna comes back or not because own karma is the decider of everything. Not even krishna can bypass karma.
all this macassar just because of 2 greedy families mazak mazak mai razak bhai margai ( RAZAK BHAI REFERS TO ALL THOSE WHO WERE KILLED EXCEPT THOSE 2 FAMALIES)
Maybe this make sense to me. Since a kid I used to dream to visit india, until I heard about Mahabharata, after that, I threw that dream away. I hate wars imo war is equal to a primitive human. Just violent countries with violent leaders support wars for pleasure or power. This made me kind of understand why I don't like hindu tradition.
Mahabharat is more than just a war is almost as a microcosmos of human behaviour and patterns that we all carry, once you start reading Mahabharata and once you have right perspective you start to notice how relevant is for the world, and for yourself. there is many thing we can learn from it :)
War happens everywhere not just in Hindu tradition, The Mahabharat war happened between 2 cousins clans Pandavas(sons of King Pandu) and Kauravas(sons of King Dhritarashtra, Pandu's elder brother). The reason of war was many bad acts done by Kauravas, however the tipping point which started the war was when Draupadi(wife of pandava) was insulted and humiliated as one of the Kauravas tried to disrobe her in public. It was in this war where Arjun(son of Pandu) seeing his cousins, grandfathers, uncles and all the relatives in-front of him taking up arms against him after his wife was humiliated by his cousin Duryodhan(son of Dhritarashtra) fell into a moral dilemma of how by killing his our family will bring any peace to him. That is when GOD(in the form of a human(Shri Krishna)) explained him about his responsibility and fighting for the good, that is when GOD explained him about life and death and how dying is not the end for us, he inspired him to get up and fight the evil doers in front of him. Those word spoken by GOD is written in Bhagwat Gita. You can read here - bhagavadgita.io/chapter/1
If you dont like visiting places with history of war, then I probably think there is no place in this world you can visit or stay... Why you dont like Hindu tradition can you explain.
@@rameshgopinathennair8720 my comment was focused on the genie part. I just assumed that maybe that is the reason why I don't want to visit India, who knows, memories from the past? My mother had indian ancestors. As a kid she talked to me about India and even talked to me about krishna, brahma, Vishnu and Shiva. Once I heard about Arjuna whom I used to like, listening my mother stories and her fascination for her India roots was my drive to visit once. All of a sudden, I started having dreams of a huge war, then in my youth I read some part of a huge war called Mahabharata. And, my dreams were worst. So, I just distamce my self from any Hindu scriptures. Seems like the gene may carry some information that,l cause those memories. Fun fact, I had a dream once, a man driving a chariot around the SUN and another man talking to him while he drove, when I read the book krishna and Arjuna had a conversation in a similar scenario. War is everywhere. Should I accept war just because of that? It is just a feeling.
@ArjunVB666 no, crucifixion of jesus is real. Buddha is real hajarat md is real. They are historical figures with evidence. But some story related to them are fake.
Mahabharata storyline 10% only original, 90% is myth and imagination of Someones 10% original story is that South Indian peoples war story between ancient Kerala Kuravar and Ancient tamilnadu pandyar of ancient Tamilakom.
You’re right, but unfortunately, many young Indians themselves are forgetting their own culture. I'm not doing this for any kind of approval, but to showcase the greatness of the Mahabharata, including to Indian, which sometimes downplay their own culture
@@rakesharamaiah2737 You’re right, but unfortunately, many young Indians themselves are forgetting their own culture. I'm not doing this for any kind of approval, but to showcase the greatness of the Mahabharata, including to Indian, which sometimes downplay their own culture
don't know whether the creator of this video himself knows what he is talking about and on what basis he is talking? and a funny part is; in comment section someone talks about 7000 yrs someone talks about 5000 yrs. Don't know how many theories are there. 😂
The Mahabharata and the Kurukshetra war are complex subjects that have been studied for centuries. The differences in timelines, such as 7000 or 5000 years ago, stem from various scholarly interpretations based on astronomical data, archaeological findings, and historical records. Instead of dismissing the content it might be beneficial to delve deeper into the research and evidence presented. its not always black and white brother :)
@@AashishPandey-ls1rc this sentence alone tells me then your knowledge is very limited and out of context, I would suggest that you educate yourself a bit more, and then we could actually have civilised debate/ conversation
The mahabharatas war of 18 days which led to the killings of innocent human beings and animals at the call of leaders because of ego and power is not justified. Bhagwan Krishna could have avoided this unnecessary war. Mankind has been fighting wars for hundreds and thousands of years. When will all these stop and peace reign over all mankind.
Before talking about anything related to India, first learn how to spell the Hindi words correctly. Are you India by birth? "Mahabharattttta" what man? Stop putting "aa" after everything which has been criticized as angrizikaran of Hindi words.
How else would you explain the fall of Y chromosome diversity 7500 years ago? The ratio of X to Y chromosome diversity fell to 16:1 in that period. Before it was 3:1. After a few millennia, it recovered to 3:1 again. The epicenter of this fall of genetic diversity was in Indian subcontinent. This conclusion has been derived by modern day genetic scientists after conducting their super intensive research. So which event could have caused this except a War?
@@AashishPandey-ls1rc A man has XY chromosomes and a woman has XX chromosomes. So a couple has 3 Xs and 1 Y chromosome. That's 3:1 ratio. In a population with close to 50-50% population of men & women, the ratio will be 3:1. The genetic study conducted by WESTERN scientists has concluded that around 5500 & 5000 BC, there was a sudden decline in that ratio from 3:1 to 16:1 and it's epicenter was Indian subcontinent. It's ripple effect went as far as Europe & South East Asia. They don't know the cause of this decline! And being Western, they probably don't know about Mahabharat and it's timeline! But their research fits perfectly with the timing of Mahabharat and the War where 4 million men died out of 10 million population (5 million men). So 1 million men & 5 million women left. That's 5:1 by head count & (3:1 x 5:1 =) 15:1 by chromosome count. Hence proved! You can study their research for scientific queries.
@@AashishPandey-ls1rc bro 3:1 ratio is the standard ratio, use some logic please, girls have 2 X chromosomes and boys have 1 X and 1 Y. every child gets all the chromosomes of parents which means 3 x and 1 y so the default ratio is 3:1 As for the nuclear weapons, even plastic gets dissolved in a thousand year, if romans had invented plastic we would never know because even that get dissolved, this war happened in 5561 BCE, that's seven thousand years ago, nothing from that era can survive so long, except the story which was passed down orally from generation to generation in a perfect language(Sanskrit)
with all rdue respect, Indian culture is great and as a hindu monk obviously I see immense value, but unfortunate its happening that people who are born in India cannot see what they have in front of their noses, so its not me explaining, but me honouring the culture and in this case Mahabharata itself.
It was most likely a tribal war between 2 prevalent tribes there. These guys were then taken over or were Aryans of Central Asia who brought Sanskrits parent language to what is modern India and Pakistan and Nepal and Bhutan and became the new Indians. It’s possible they wrote these tales of their battles from Central Asia or of their ancestors in India and Pakistan. There’s very little historical proof of this. It’s also filled with ridiculousness like a guy being able to choose his own time of death which is not possible, esp for prehistoric primitive tribes. Just like Marvel Avengers today is just entertainment and not real, Mahabharata is also their entertainment imo and not to be taken as real. 100 kids and 1 woman in group marriage with 5 brothers and having children with all is just entertainment and not real. Imagine a polygamy relationship like this today. It would be illegal. So it shouldn’t be in the supposed “holy books”. They’re all like that.
That is the reason the Britishers and foreigners call you peoples tribal.......and also these tribes' understandings in language astronomy makes them even better developed than us don't you think......I mean people of this era even can't write such complex writings in such smooth manner...the way Mahabharat was written
@@neelamanus2022 you for real? Primitive tribal people existed everywhere from Britain to India to China in prehistoric times. They were all tribal back then. And they had very low and basic understanding of astronomy. Yes they could see the stars and identify planets but that’s about it. They did simple math based on these objects. For calendars. That’s about it. Our knowledge and understanding today improved based on their work over time to the point we’re landing rockets on the planets and you and I are talking to each other via the internet. No they were nowhere close to being more advanced than modern humans
@@fr9714 Your belief system is based on Aryan invasion theory brought by the britishers which has no evidences and now someone busting this belief system...😂😂😂 I can understand your pain...also those primitive tribals only from India made the highly geometrical structured temples, sur of songs sa re ga ma....a highly developed language Sanskrit , number systems and many things........now you guys don't want other possibilities to explore and hell bent on everything the bhritishers have wrote and taught don't want to come out from the colonial mindset then what can anyone do......why don't you ask the Europeans to give evidence on Iliad and odyssey and from where they get their God culture...
Given the numerous requests for more evidence, we have created a second video that presents a wealth of supporting material. We hope this will satisfy your inquiries and demonstrate that the Mahabharata is not just fiction. ua-cam.com/video/UJpEbaAraS4/v-deo.html
South Asia was a term coined to appease Pakistan. Right word should be Indian subcontinent as per Nilesh Neelkanth Oak
Dats true. Now tryin to change name of Indian Ocean.
Subcontinent yes, India no. There was no India then. Even today there are three countries in the Subcontinent.
@@huzaifaattarwala9615 The Tectonic Plate and the Ocean where the subcontinent rests is called Indian. Fun Fact: The name India existed even before Islam came to earth and the 'countries' in the Indian Subcontinent were created by the British. The geographic region of Indian Subcontinent will always be addressed as Indian subcontinent.
@@adityasundar324 Yes, India word is derived from our River Indus. Indus was named by the Greeks, the outsiders. Thousands of years back there was no India, not geographically nor as a political entity.
@huzaifaattarwala9615 India is the term given to the Indian subcontinent. Period. It is like saying there was no America before the Europeans came. India has been called Bharat time immemorial. India / Bharat is a geographical area and not a political identity. There is absolutely no necessity to appease anyone. Like it or not, it is the Indian subcontinent.
We really need to stop being so insecure about it... It's Itihaas... We don't see the Greeks trying to prove the Trojan war, do we?
it's the bitter truth that is hard to engulf by hindus ...as a hindu
Aryan migration theory make us doubt. Our ancient history lies in IVC scripts!!!! And evn world history.
Cause that never happened
@@prakharsinha7how much will u cry
And it's not abt atheism
It's abt the culture
Ruins of city of troy, has been found
But still no clue about mahabharatha 😂
Excellent and correct explanation - Mahabharat and Ramayana are History (Itihaas) not mythology and every Indian needs to know it in detail।and spread this news worldwide. Just look at all these evidences from archaeology, climatology, geography, genetics, religious traditions, astronomy
It upsets me that archeology concentrates on ancient Egypt, Roman and Greek, the Mayas and the Incas, Great Britain and so on. I’ve never heard of nor seen any talk or documentary about India. Why is it so? Thank you for this vid. Very uplifting.
Because indian don't interest in there history 😏
If its from Bharat and Sanatan Dharma
Hide it
Thats the communist Marxist philosophy
If Bharateeya philiosphybis freely available theres no ground for bith Capitalist mechanisms like patents will become reduntant and ao will communism
It is not a myth... But myth was introduced in it deliberately... To make it look like a myth i think you got it right... Read the og version of mahabharat... Jaya samhita... Its really has the history though.
@@Pontiff03 colonialism racist mentality of the ones who poisoned the world with the myth thing. Let's give Bharat it's true due of respect. Jai Bharata 🕉️
@@Jamuna-Atma I don't give a fk about the colonials... What my perception of reality shows truth to me... is something that I believe in... Because I trust myself and I am rational... Mahabharat's Jaya Samhita was History... people were normal... they had fortified cities, had their set of problems and rejections... People created fan fanctions of Mahabharat and Ramayan, to make them seem anime with plot... Supernatural powers. Humans... will never have supernatural powers... because we have no trace of it's existence... nor did the person who actually wrote down the alternative series knows anything about it... It's just a piece of imagination... that was carved, and now the people of India Thinks It's History... as they can't seem to see the true light that I see. They never question the intention of the author... why is the way it is supposed to be, the origins.
All the Indian Mythical stories from Puranas, give explanation to the events of the mainstream stories, which absolutely lacks any details... and in certain case feels Hollow and Incomplete, and the whole crux, feels kind of hopeless to me.
even batman is not a myth ... he used to fly in india with batcar 10000 years ago
@@riddunyra4373 you a hole ... You're a fooder kid... I am talking about the goddamn events that took place... In Mahabharat were real... War was real... But the superhuman concept, the unnatural birth from gods... Are all bullshit... This is why I told everyone to read og Mahabharat version Jaya samhita, which contains original version of Mahabharat... You need to read between lines ... Batman's helicopter.
I think it is the supernatural references in the epic that classifies the story as Myth.
And we call ourselves modern generation......still can't able to find why the iron pillar of ancient India doesn't rust....and you are expecting to find the technology used at that time periods and also after burning the historical and scientific records recorded and preserved in one of worlds largest libraries....Nalanda.. 😅😅
Where do you think your Brave Hanuman was hiding during Mughal attack ?
@dukenukemforever6912 Fighting the Mughals....😁😁
nalanda largest library ? joking ?
It indeed was the largest library in its time before it was destroyed @@codyt1617
Why iron didnt rust isnt a question we dont know. We know because phosphorus was used with iron 🤷
Mahabarath means the history of Greater India.
according to wikipedia :D
@@MahabharatUntoldStories-up7rv Are you planning a video series about the events in the Mahabharata ? Like from beginning to end
@@VJ592 yes I do, I have some out already, check and let me know if thats what's you mean
@@MahabharatUntoldStories-up7rv Please consider doing it in order of the book. There is a great need for this story to be told. My knowledge of the story is very limited hence I am and many others are looking to understand it better.
I suggest do it academically translating from Sanskrit at first. Then draw on the various sages commentaries.
Its a huge task.
0:23 - "Involving 18 armies, also known as Akshauhinis" should probably be "involving 18 battalions, known as Akshauhinis, split between two armies"
yes correct, thank you :)
Hey everyone! I just want to say a big thank you for all your comments and support. I've started a new video series on the Mahabharata, focusing on how its characters can inspire personal growth and improve our lives. I believe this series can truly benefit everyone, here is the link, let me know what you think :)
ua-cam.com/video/mrZNowFnozU/v-deo.html
any proofs or your own imagination ? batman stories
Mahabharat war negates Aryan invasion. Infact after the devastating Mahabharat war Vedic Aryans migrated from India. Mahabharat war was plan of Bhagvan Krishna to lessen burden of earth.
That obviously didn't work. Indians are still "overburdening" the earth by their mass-birthing (making a billion babies) and migrating to every other country. Kalki will now have to come and subdue them. 😢
Great job! Thank you for your work.
Thank you, Dr. Nilesh. Your explanations are always incredibly helpful.
Makes sense. Losing so many men from war will force kingdoms to have matriarch female leaders
Just because a ruler/leader is female doesn't mean the society is matriarchal.
Vast majority of men who die in war are mostly poor soldiers..the ones who can royally ascend a position only makes less than top 1%.
@@JamesBond-cd2pj That is the definition of a matriarch. Having a female ruler lol
It happened in a different Space-time (yuga) dimension in the multiverse (Brahmhanda). And the event has been recorded in CBRE later , the event is decoded by the yogic masters.
Pls brother.. From where you got the information
Suggest me the books you read if possible
...if that's correct, it should be called 'World-War Zero'...! 😞😱
No pan Asia war except china and Japan.
HISTORY.. THE TRUTH
👍👍👍❤❤
Great explanation 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Glad you liked it!
But doesn't mahabharat dates back 5000 yrs ago.... How's it 7500 yrs ago here?
Can't thank you enough for all the efforts you've taken to present this amazing video. Jai Hind 🫡
So nice of you
It is said that kakabhushundi has seen different ramayanas 11 times and different mahabharatas 16 tumes in different versions. That means every cycle of 4 yugas ramayana and Mahabharata will be enacted. If everything us written abd will take place as per plan then what is their to judge right or wrong.
Possible, but coincidence does not necessarily equal causation. But I do believe that the ancient Vedic cultures were instrumental in shaping many belief systems and practices throughout the world.
ये जय नाम का इतिहास है. "This History Has a Name of Victory "
always wondered if, india was so advanced during 4000-5000 BC.,when mahabharat and ramayan happened that things could fly etc,,,,then how come no one figured out writing at the time ..why no writing or paintings on walls etc. telling about the war stories....it was finally written down in 300 AD...how can someone remember stories accurately after 4000 years of passing down the story....its like if someone wrote about buddha's life today on basis of hear say passed to generations over 2500 years ...how accurate you can be??
Its a myth
bro myths dont have relics like ones in haryana nepal up go there you will find it
Ever heard of great flood.... civilization reset?
@@evilgetsraw278124 as per hindu mythology the great flood happened much before Rama....and even if you consider another great flood wiping off civilization (western)...then that makes it even more absurd that some one will be able to write down the story after 5000 or so years later of any event that has no witnesses
@@sodea13 Hindus had a very advanced concept of Shruti and Smriti. They had learnt and memorized all the events and teachings of the past efficiently. When you look at ancient Indian temples(mostly in South India), you could see how advanced ancient Indians were. Today such temples are next to impossible to even think forget about erecting them.
🙏🏼👍Jai Hind Jai Bharath
How did they come from so far, so quickly
Nice work❤
Thanks
May be this sudden drop male population was the reason behind preference for male child in Indian culture, which can be seen even today.
No matter what anyone says, I believe in Indian legends and epics and it truly happened. As far as things about DNA and other facts it is being not very conclusive but rather confusing because in one video on UA-cam a Indian guy by the way of world population of that time and DNA evidence subtly suggested Mahabharata is just a story nothing else and Indian original population were of steppe herders who impregnated Indian women.
Not for the south indian
The so-called Neolithic Y-chromosome bottleneck is thought to have resulted from several battles and conflicts between various tribes worldwide rather than the Mahabharata conflict alone in India. This might be the result of social changes as opposed to environmental ones.
In the beginning, it has been stated that the war happened 7500 years ago. Then it has been stated that the Y-chromosome bottleneck occurred at the same time in South Asia. Which one does the narrator try to assume and which one does he intend to prove? The time of the war or the war really did happen? Has he any evidence that humans had a capacity to arrange for such a huge war 7500 years ago that according to his narrative collected soldiers from Syria to Indonesia? These kind of narratives are mere speculations which need to be presented modestly as heuristics instead of claiming those in an assertive way. Then only some further scope of discussion remains. Otherwise, these are considered by the rational mind as mere beliefs that have only entertainment value.
I too have a question if mahabharat was 5000 yrs ago then why it's mentioned 7500 yrs ago here?
But we have to take under consideration the British & mughal invasions.... I would like to blame them that the real pages of mahabharat is extinct along with the followers of lokayat from that era, cuz yk everything has it's opposite like good has bad....Believer had non believers... Quiet controversial
Great video and I’ve seen Oak’s work. But somehow we don’t seem to have any chariots, weapons, or remains from the war at the site. It’s baffling why all the people who feel strongly haven’t asked for ASI to work on this. Plus, some aspects, like Ashwattama’s gem or Ghatotkacha’s abilities that turned the war make no sense. I’m a huge proponent of revival of those principles by inquiry but these points are somehow never addressed and cause people to consider it myth.
If you would have done some research, you would hv know that archaeologists have found remains of chariots & female vests (kavach) which dates back before Harappan civilization
First of all it is not Mahabharta war but Kurukshetra war.
its just for the sake of understanding, it doesn't make so much of a difference, does it? the point that it happen stands
@@MahabharatUntoldStories-up7rv it does to Indians because there are many wars in Mahabharta granted Kurukshetra war is the biggest of them.
ok fair point.
evidence? no weapons left, no golden pots and jewelry.... any arheological discovery?
@@bojankojic108 Ruins of Dwaraka city/ castle beneath the sea level.
Mahabharata is an epic poem, all the human construct. We are supposed to talk with the fact based narrative, and with logical reasoning.
Everyone is telling their own story and saying its HIS STORY (HISTORY)
No, there is a different between stories and history.
Anyone can tell a story but in order for a story to become history, it must be backed up with accurate information and data which can be verified.
A drunkard can claim he went to Mars - that is his story. Whether it become a history or not is depends whether he can verify it with proof. Otherwise he is just a drunkard.
అంత పెద్ద యుద్ధం ఏ గొప్పల కోసం?
అన్నదమ్ముల మధ్య పంపకాలలో తేడాలలననే కదా -- అతి కొద్ది మంది ప్రయోజనాలకు అందరిని బలి చేయడం
ఇదేనా అంత గొప్ప విషయం😢
Mahabharat war actually happened between the kuru clan but around 1000-900bc as per the archaeological findings. The stuff related to mahabharat was dated to belonging from the mahajanapada period of our history. The claims that mahabharat war happened 7500 or 5000 years ago are baseless, they don’t have any historical evidence.
@@AashishPandey-ls1rc ASI findings architecture, other artifacts which were carbon dated these things supposedly claim this
Just because there are different theories and timelines regarding the Kurukshetra war doesn't mean it didn't happen. Historical events often have multiple interpretations due to varying evidence and perspectives. While the exact details of how and what occurred are subjects of ongoing debate, there is substantial evidence in ancient scriptures like the Mahabharata and other shastras supporting its significance. Faith plays an essential role in interpreting and understanding religious and cultural histories. Dismissing these accounts outright overlooks the rich heritage and the profound impact they have had on shaping society and culture. It's important to approach such topics with an open mind and consider the depth of evidence and faith that surrounds them.
@@MahabharatUntoldStories-up7rv exactly just because the time frame isnt clear we can’t outright deny the existence of this event. Literature architecture etc have always supported it that mahabharata war has happened at some point in time but there no concrete historical evidence of its “timeline”, i.e., when it happened. And as long as there is no concrete evidence of kurukshetra war this timeline debate will go on and everyone will present there own perspective on it
@@anshulmalviya5468how do you pin point that year. Archeological findings are insufficient to find actual dates. Have archeology unearthed each and every site possible. Have they done enough research. Only considering pot and pans, spear and arrow as evidence can't let you find real timeline of such historic events. There could have happened less significant wars in same areas which has not been mentioned anywhere in literary records. If you find weaponry for this less significant war. How can you definitely call it is related to Mahabharata. Archeology has its limitations and their timelines will keep changing as per new findings. Their insights are important in determining what kind of life people used to live, what rituals they performed, technology what they had,..........their findings are incredibly good but timeline decisions they make is very much inaccurate as that is bound to change as per findings. Literary data of astrology is available in Mahabharata epic. Once you run computer simulation as per condition mentioned in Mahabharata epic. You are bound to reach year around 5500bc. This gives you convincing match. Also City of Dwarka submerged in sea after some years of Mahabharata war as described in epic. Oceanographic data too supports the same conditions of rising sea level and then sea ports of Indus valley civilization lothal , balakot, sutkagen dor becoming a port is also established by same archeological findings. But if you visit these places today they are landlocked. There are many other significant evidences which are not dirt archeology based. But if you connect dots properly Mahabharata timeline goes far backward than what these pot pan people say 😆😆😆😆😆
@anshulmalviya5468 3102 bce is the date according ancient telegu aihole inscriptions
🤨 😏 ancient aliens came together in this planet, to do what they did/do best, which is, to destroy "en masse". I wonder who/what created this mass negativity among living creatures?😢And for what reason?
Yeah, still think after this
Knowledge ideas are Good, but it doesn't mean you should speculate.
Do u mean the invention of metallurgy happened in India 7500 BC or just new fabrics of story...
Thanks for another fabulous piece.
Thanks for listening
Why not repeated with WWI and WWII?
WWII 75m died mostly men
Iron was found around 1000 BC in india for the first time during post vedic period to made weapons. Mahajanpadas came into existence in 600 BC and u want us to believe that Mahabharata and ramayana happened within 400 years?
Can't u see the evidence?
if something is found for the first time in a region doesn't mean it is the be all and end all of things found there. It doesn't mean things cannot be older than that. Knowledge can be lost and so can be evidence, and most evidence is lost. Archaeologists used to believe our civilisation was 2000 years, then it became 5000 years from parts of Indus Valley, now the latest evidence in Harappa points to 9000 years old. One reason why I believe archaeology is such an imprecise science!
It is simply not possible that people were not using Iron during the vedic period.
Its like saying Gravity didn't exist till Newton discovered it.
Very well summarized 🙏🏽
appreciate it
Vedas are right and vedas are Shruti, Gita, Ramayana, mahavarat are all smriti
Same data Monika carwin
So maybe an off topic question or not... But why did they use charioteers if they had advanced technology such as the vamana?
Charioteers I read as pilots. The narrator didn’t have that word at that time.
Because of War Rules. Both army must use similar weapons, astra and vehicles in order to be considered a dharmic (righteous) war. Thos with spear will attack those with spears, swordmen vs swordmen, archers vs archers etc. Use of Astras are the only exception here because even so the astra are aimed at specific individual, it can have area-effect which kills others around (like the infamous Brahmastra).
As for vimanas, throughout Mahabratha epic, very little people actually used vimana as tool which may indicate that the use of vimana in war during that time was forbidden as it could lead to unfair advantage to one group.
@@GobiSubramaniam you kinda are saying what I cleas concluding with the stuff I know. Thank you for your indepth information. It was very insightful. Hari Om
@@Jamuna-Atma - Did you notice that during Mahabratha times, there was very little people who actually flew, except maybe the Gods like Hanuman?
In Ramayana times, Ravana and his son, Indrajit both used vimana in battles and Sri Rama (and Laksamana) both had to devise means of detecting and destroying aerial vehicles similar to Surface to Air missiles we have today.
Perhaps the technology of Vimana itself had been lost at the time of Mahabratha which may explain why there were no vimanas used.
Even in modern warfare armies use tanks and vehicles although there are fighter jets, the reason is cost and effectiveness. In Mahabharata times warfare was carried out with values i.e they believed in 1:1 combat and the combatants were in close proximity to each other. Imagine using a fighter jet on an area where you have both yours and opposing armies.
Maybe mixed with myth and facts
one baboon prince barks rhetorically that India is not a nation but union of states.
❤🌊 ➕ merci Beaucoups for sharing 👐 🖐!✨ Cher soulsolidarity sacred sisters brothers with gratitude love respect from Indigo from Lyra namaste 🙏 peace ✌ Goddess galactique cosmoschristia dharmakaya world's within 🗺 without end 🌟 ketharic El ayin Soph Aur EL-SHADDAI universalitia 🌌 🏆 🔹 💕
This was actually the first World War! :)
👍👍👍❤❤❤
not thinking it can be conformed mahabharath and ramayan is myth, what is the period of treta yuva chathur yuga , its near to 9 laksh years before ramayan and archeology says its 5000 years before , and same for mahabharatha , 20 ,000years before there were only naga people in full india speaking only tamil language , and nagas and mayans seperated from india according to ambedkar research, and nepal prime minister said rama is born in nepal with evidence , so dont portrait ramayana and mahabharath is fact its only myth always .
Cmmon dude.
I dont know if u will take this comment seriously...still...
Lord Krishna is the fabled King David (Dawood in Islam) of Israel..his Capital was in Judah..from which we get the clan "Jadu Bangsha". Nation of Israel later got divided into two kingdoms and these two factions clashed against each other. The "Star of David'" depicted on the flag of present Israel is The "Sudarshan Chakra" of Lord Krishna. After the war the defeated faction (Kurus)moved to southern side (Present Arabia)..from the Kurus, came the "Koraesh" Clan of Arabia Mecca...and You know from which Arabic Clan did come Mohammad(PBUH), Prophet of Islam..rings a bell?...
Nation of Israel later got conquared and vandalised by Babylonians..just what happened to Jadus after passing of Lord Krishna(they did not mention babylon, they mentioned barbaric aggresive people in Mahabharata taking away the ladies of Jadus from the protection of Arjuna)..
The last hint...have you heatd of Psalms of David?..in Islam, the book that was given to Dawood (King David) is called "Jabur" and the meaning of the word "Jabur" is Music or "Geet" in Sangskrit.."Geeta".."Bhagabat Geeta" = Music from God..
Israel= Isra+ El = Ishwar+ Aloy = House of God.
The Whole Sindhis, Punjabis, Kashmiris, Rajputs, Pathans = Lost tribes of Israel...
Time line of King David = 1000 BC
I have lot more to hint at...i wish i could put them in this one comment...Jews are lost brothers of Indians, specially North Indians.
Arrey bhai naam tera Pritam hai, ulti kahani bata raha hai, Islam ki koi history nahi hai woh jews aur christian se copy pasted hai aur jo purani arabia ki pagan religions thi unhi ki stories hain
yeh flow hai knowledge ka.
Sanatan -> Judaism -> Christianity -> Islam
@@gs-e2dsanatan then Zoroastrianism. Both are sister religion
Your claim sounds like
"Kya yahudi hi yaduvanshi hai"
@@arsh_arora10 koi Sister religion nahi hai Sanatan purana hai, Zorastrian 10000 saal se pehle nahi jaata.
But the narayani sena it self had 10 million warrior how could there be only 20 million people that time . Maybe your prediction us wrong. Or the truth is Mahabharata is a fiction.
Virat Kohli has no 18
If we can’t change the world towards a positive direction, we have to rely on mythical subjects comprised with history. It will lead us backwards.
Bhai itihas pdho yarr tum. Mtlb I can't tell you in the comment on how many accounts you are wrong.
Arz kiya hai,
"tum aana poori zindagi le kr k kbhi fhir bataunga ki tumhari galati kya thi?"
Well done My friend 👏
Brilliant and on top of it
How did it start from a insult 🤔 which then lead to Conflict and because the 5 brothers marrying 1 women is a very bad notions and sound very disturbing.
On top of this all these So called Power Teacher Kings holy Men sat on there Seats while a Man grabbed a women from her hair for the insulting remark she made and brought her stripping to his brother Kings Court in front of her husband who used her as a Gambling 🎰 piece no worth no dignity no honour no justice
And were on there knees in till a spiritual God covered her.
Sets a bad tone for a population that women are like treated worse then Animals and justice ⚖️ is very lacking.
Any archeological evidence??
Dwarka city
Even wikipedia says the owner of dwarka is krishna
India itself
@@barberianking9272 gg
in matura his home is there
The Bridge made by Lord Rama between India and Sri Lanka
nilesh himself got wrong history, watch janaki ram telugu cosmic youtube channel to know when this happened exactly directly from the inscriptions of Mahabharat and Bhagavadgita from Archaeological evidences, and astronimical evidences.
Nilesh Oak is a good writer but not good researcher.
Ramanayana and Mahabharata are stories 😂😂
Maha bharata war is true but only in india north region it was there. Were from all India. Previous pakistan. Bangladesh may have fought kings . But not from north eastern china jsoan korea. Hongkong. Singapore. Or African Cambodia. Morocco Egypt etc .this is fake
addition of kuch bhi story
7000 years ago, Rama ravan udha happened, 5000 years ago mahabharat happened.. Don't miss lead the audience
different timing base don different soureces, nobody can really say- no misleading happening
He is not misleading. He is saying the truth.
@@MahabharatUntoldStories-up7rv what's ur source of information
you dont have any knowledge. ... so it's better you read bhahavat geetha ( then you will know wat is mahabrata/ kuruksetra)
@@manihari890 I have read it so I am telling here to correct the mistake.., if u calculate rama star and planets may be you'll find the truth
Mahabharatha is just a mythical exaggeration of war, that happened between 2 opposing divisions formed out of mahajanapadas.
The literary form of mahabharatha and ramayana came into existence because of the greek influence at the mauryan period
Mahabharata is not about war.
its about many things, mainly Dharma :)
@MahabharatUntoldStories-up7rv exactly. Unfortunately many people think it's a war story.
this why men can have many wives
Not now, Now there are less females.
It's literally mythology.
Looks like a desperation but why?
😂😂😂😂 soo funny 7500 year
We cant fully make every scene historical and evidenced . We just have a narrative book snd we cant verify each sequence happened or not . We generally know the war occurred. It wasnt world war but mostly regional war as it occurred only in ancient india. We cant question the author nor the book now. Anyway i have no use it war occurred or not but the present time. I am not living in the past with krishna or ram but in the now without any of them. My job is to live my life truthfully. It doesnt even matter krishna comes back or not because own karma is the decider of everything. Not even krishna can bypass karma.
If the male female ratio was so skewed towards the women why didn’t more areas become matriarchal ??
all this macassar just because of 2 greedy families
mazak mazak mai razak bhai margai
( RAZAK BHAI REFERS TO ALL THOSE WHO WERE KILLED EXCEPT THOSE 2 FAMALIES)
It seems you are from WhatsApp university. Can you give data so called bottle neck effect. Do you even know what are you talking about?
Bro just quoted Nilesh Oak word by word.
There's nothing new in this video.
Good graphics without any first hand research.
Maybe this make sense to me. Since a kid I used to dream to visit india, until I heard about Mahabharata, after that, I threw that dream away. I hate wars imo war is equal to a primitive human. Just violent countries with violent leaders support wars for pleasure or power. This made me kind of understand why I don't like hindu tradition.
Mahabharat is more than just a war is almost as a microcosmos of human behaviour and patterns that we all carry, once you start reading Mahabharata and once you have right perspective you start to notice how relevant is for the world, and for yourself. there is many thing we can learn from it :)
War happens everywhere not just in Hindu tradition, The Mahabharat war happened between 2 cousins clans Pandavas(sons of King Pandu) and Kauravas(sons of King Dhritarashtra, Pandu's elder brother).
The reason of war was many bad acts done by Kauravas, however the tipping point which started the war was when Draupadi(wife of pandava) was insulted and humiliated as one of the Kauravas tried to disrobe her in public.
It was in this war where Arjun(son of Pandu) seeing his cousins, grandfathers, uncles and all the relatives in-front of him taking up arms against him after his wife was humiliated by his cousin Duryodhan(son of Dhritarashtra) fell into a moral dilemma of how by killing his our family will bring any peace to him.
That is when GOD(in the form of a human(Shri Krishna)) explained him about his responsibility and fighting for the good, that is when GOD explained him about life and death and how dying is not the end for us, he inspired him to get up and fight the evil doers in front of him. Those word spoken by GOD is written in Bhagwat Gita.
You can read here - bhagavadgita.io/chapter/1
If you dont like visiting places with history of war, then I probably think there is no place in this world you can visit or stay... Why you dont like Hindu tradition can you explain.
@@rameshgopinathennair8720 my comment was focused on the genie part. I just assumed that maybe that is the reason why I don't want to visit India, who knows, memories from the past? My mother had indian ancestors. As a kid she talked to me about India and even talked to me about krishna, brahma, Vishnu and Shiva. Once I heard about Arjuna whom I used to like, listening my mother stories and her fascination for her India roots was my drive to visit once. All of a sudden, I started having dreams of a huge war, then in my youth I read some part of a huge war called Mahabharata. And, my dreams were worst. So, I just distamce my self from any Hindu scriptures. Seems like the gene may carry some information that,l cause those memories. Fun fact, I had a dream once, a man driving a chariot around the SUN and another man talking to him while he drove, when I read the book krishna and Arjuna had a conversation in a similar scenario. War is everywhere. Should I accept war just because of that? It is just a feeling.
@@AashishPandey-ls1rcu can just check who is vyasa really is and how did he wrote this long tale... it's right there in youtube too
🤣🤣😅😅😅😅
7'500 years ago? What a lie. NEXT
Not Mahabharata it's mahabharat, not bgwat bhagwat
yes I never claimed different, but of course BG is part of Mahabharat
Yeah it's mahabharatam.
No matter how much you try. A myth always is a myth.
Just like Virgin birth and splitting moon is it?
@ShSh-xi4rd yes.
@@rishuhu3886and man getting nailed on cross! So,e nepali dude becoming buddha and islam and prok fry is aslo myth😂😂 too
@ArjunVB666 no, crucifixion of jesus is real. Buddha is real hajarat md is real. They are historical figures with evidence. But some story related to them are fake.
@@rishuhu3886 lol! Anything you want to belive becomes truth and other thing become irrelevant isnt it? Typcal blind faith christian kid😹😹
If Mahabharata is true then Game of thrones is also true
Yes,it's true it's based on European history😂😂😂
It's true...
Mahabharata storyline 10% only original, 90% is myth and imagination of Someones
10% original story is that South Indian peoples war story between ancient Kerala Kuravar and Ancient tamilnadu pandyar of ancient Tamilakom.
It's a myth. Ok find history of Kuru Kingdom👍🏼
Total nonsense... no such research has been published in any prestigious peer reviewed journals
Our Mahabharat book is very big, it's already published very detailed,
We don't need Western approval,
You’re right, but unfortunately, many young Indians themselves are forgetting their own culture. I'm not doing this for any kind of approval, but to showcase the greatness of the Mahabharata, including to Indian, which sometimes downplay their own culture
@@rakesharamaiah2737 You’re right, but unfortunately, many young Indians themselves are forgetting their own culture. I'm not doing this for any kind of approval, but to showcase the greatness of the Mahabharata, including to Indian, which sometimes downplay their own culture
@@MahabharatUntoldStories-up7rv Bhai uski baat ka reply toh de de, ki aisa kuch hua tha 7500 saal pehle.
Indian history start where mythology starts. No repsected historian take it seriously ❌🚫
don't know whether the creator of this video himself knows what he is talking about and on what basis he is talking?
and a funny part is; in comment section someone talks about 7000 yrs someone talks about 5000 yrs. Don't know how many theories are there. 😂
The Mahabharata and the Kurukshetra war are complex subjects that have been studied for centuries. The differences in timelines, such as 7000 or 5000 years ago, stem from various scholarly interpretations based on astronomical data, archaeological findings, and historical records. Instead of dismissing the content it might be beneficial to delve deeper into the research and evidence presented. its not always black and white brother :)
@@AashishPandey-ls1rc this sentence alone tells me then your knowledge is very limited and out of context, I would suggest that you educate yourself a bit more, and then we could actually have civilised debate/ conversation
theres the marxist colonizer answer and the uncolonized answer, 7000 years ago buddy
The mahabharatas war of 18 days which led to the killings of innocent human beings and animals at the call of leaders because of ego and power is not justified. Bhagwan Krishna could have avoided this unnecessary war. Mankind has been fighting wars for hundreds and thousands of years. When will all these stop and peace reign over all mankind.
Krishna tried many times to prevent a war.
If that is not a myth where are the dead men's skeletons
are you kidding? skeleton or human bones takes 20 years to degrade we are talking about 5000 - 7500 year ago
Indian continent Bharat Aryavart
India 7000 years ago never had that amount of people, or the capacity to have a war of that caliber. 😊
it wasn't just India, watch the video :)
oh it did u j sound like an infidel lol
based on what?
Says who??? An illiterate dummy
Before talking about anything related to India, first learn how to spell the Hindi words correctly. Are you India by birth? "Mahabharattttta" what man? Stop putting "aa" after everything which has been criticized as angrizikaran of Hindi words.
I don't know what war he was talking about, regardless he couldn't convince me that it happened.
Then you must read Mahabharata which can take several months or even years to complete. It was the greatest wars ever happened in the human History .
How else would you explain the fall of Y chromosome diversity 7500 years ago?
The ratio of X to Y chromosome diversity fell to 16:1 in that period. Before it was 3:1. After a few millennia, it recovered to 3:1 again. The epicenter of this fall of genetic diversity was in Indian subcontinent.
This conclusion has been derived by modern day genetic scientists after conducting their super intensive research.
So which event could have caused this except a War?
@@AashishPandey-ls1rc
A man has XY chromosomes and a woman has XX chromosomes. So a couple has 3 Xs and 1 Y chromosome. That's 3:1 ratio.
In a population with close to 50-50% population of men & women, the ratio will be 3:1.
The genetic study conducted by WESTERN scientists has concluded that around 5500 & 5000 BC, there was a sudden decline in that ratio from 3:1 to 16:1 and it's epicenter was Indian subcontinent. It's ripple effect went as far as Europe & South East Asia.
They don't know the cause of this decline!
And being Western, they probably don't know about Mahabharat and it's timeline!
But their research fits perfectly with the timing of Mahabharat and the War where 4 million men died out of 10 million population (5 million men). So 1 million men & 5 million women left. That's 5:1 by head count & (3:1 x 5:1 =) 15:1 by chromosome count.
Hence proved!
You can study their research for scientific queries.
@@AashishPandey-ls1rc bro 3:1 ratio is the standard ratio, use some logic please, girls have 2 X chromosomes and boys have 1 X and 1 Y.
every child gets all the chromosomes of parents which means 3 x and 1 y so the default ratio is 3:1
As for the nuclear weapons, even plastic gets dissolved in a thousand year, if romans had invented plastic we would never know because even that get dissolved, this war happened in 5561 BCE, that's seven thousand years ago, nothing from that era can survive so long, except the story which was passed down orally from generation to generation in a perfect language(Sanskrit)
If this is a myth then jesus and Allah are also myths .
EVERY PURANAS AND GODS ARE MYTH, THEY R JUST METAPHORS. INCLUDING GREEK, ROMANS, CHRISTIAN EVERYTHING...
It's still myth
Cannot hear in his trying voice try to explain our culture to us
with all rdue respect, Indian culture is great and as a hindu monk obviously I see immense value, but unfortunate its happening that people who are born in India cannot see what they have in front of their noses, so its not me explaining, but me honouring the culture and in this case Mahabharata itself.
It was most likely a tribal war between 2 prevalent tribes there. These guys were then taken over or were Aryans of Central Asia who brought Sanskrits parent language to what is modern India and Pakistan and Nepal and Bhutan and became the new Indians. It’s possible they wrote these tales of their battles from Central Asia or of their ancestors in India and Pakistan. There’s very little historical proof of this. It’s also filled with ridiculousness like a guy being able to choose his own time of death which is not possible, esp for prehistoric primitive tribes. Just like Marvel Avengers today is just entertainment and not real, Mahabharata is also their entertainment imo and not to be taken as real. 100 kids and 1 woman in group marriage with 5 brothers and having children with all is just entertainment and not real. Imagine a polygamy relationship like this today. It would be illegal. So it shouldn’t be in the supposed “holy books”. They’re all like that.
That is the reason the Britishers and foreigners call you peoples tribal.......and also these tribes' understandings in language astronomy makes them even better developed than us don't you think......I mean people of this era even can't write such complex writings in such smooth manner...the way Mahabharat was written
ah the infidel is here lol
@@neelamanus2022 you for real? Primitive tribal people existed everywhere from Britain to India to China in prehistoric times. They were all tribal back then. And they had very low and basic understanding of astronomy. Yes they could see the stars and identify planets but that’s about it. They did simple math based on these objects. For calendars. That’s about it.
Our knowledge and understanding today improved based on their work over time to the point we’re landing rockets on the planets and you and I are talking to each other via the internet. No they were nowhere close to being more advanced than modern humans
@@serratedDharma ah the blind ignorant fool is here
@@fr9714 Your belief system is based on Aryan invasion theory brought by the britishers which has no evidences and now someone busting this belief system...😂😂😂 I can understand your pain...also those primitive tribals only from India made the highly geometrical structured temples, sur of songs sa re ga ma....a highly developed language Sanskrit , number systems and many things........now you guys don't want other possibilities to explore and hell bent on everything the bhritishers have wrote and taught don't want to come out from the colonial mindset then what can anyone do......why don't you ask the Europeans to give evidence on Iliad and odyssey and from where they get their God culture...
It is a myth
What evidence?! Total crap.