Part 3: Submitting the weird manager's plan to the head of HR for trying to sabotage the company

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 15

  • @nampamom
    @nampamom 14 днів тому +14

    When i was a junior manager I witnessed an employee come forward with recorded evidence of wrongdoing, and the senior manager fired the employee for recording at work. They really missed the point.

    • @maxalberts2003
      @maxalberts2003 13 днів тому +4

      No, they were well aware of the point and decided for whatever reason(s) to quash any investigation, fire a scapegoat and shut the whole thing up.

  • @kenfenske5002
    @kenfenske5002 6 днів тому +1

    In my experience the person reporting this is always screwed.

  • @FARBerserker
    @FARBerserker 14 днів тому +12

    And then Jennifer was fired and the Managers actions got swept under the rug.

  • @elliotthefennekin6506
    @elliotthefennekin6506 14 днів тому +9

    What the most unrealistic part about this is the company siding with you

    • @Nyperold018
      @Nyperold018 14 днів тому

      You're saying a company has no interest in protecting its bottom line?

    • @maxalberts2003
      @maxalberts2003 13 днів тому

      @@Nyperold018 Its "bottom line" in this instance played out exactly as management wanted it to. I would guess that there were several people involved in this plot, members of upper management among them.

    • @stephanien6237
      @stephanien6237 13 днів тому

      We don’t yet know who they are investigating, Jennifer or the manager…

  • @Hear-Me-Roar-Some-More
    @Hear-Me-Roar-Some-More 15 днів тому +2

    Your channel is awesome, Thank you very much, @Kein 🎬👏👏👏

  • @surfingonmars8979
    @surfingonmars8979 14 днів тому +5

    I predict Jennifer gets fired!

  • @Grumpy-Curmudgeon
    @Grumpy-Curmudgeon 14 днів тому +4

    Then HR says, "Jennifer, we are in a two-party jurisdiction, did you obtain permission before recording your manager?"

    • @FARBerserker
      @FARBerserker 14 днів тому +6

      That is only for court admissable stuff, not for anything else.

    • @Grumpy-Curmudgeon
      @Grumpy-Curmudgeon 14 днів тому

      @@FARBerserker Actually, it is called Unlawful interception of oral communication: This offense occurs when someone intentionally intercepts or records a private conversation without all parties' consent. Unlawful interception of oral communication is a third-degree felony, punishable by up to five years in prison and a fine of up to $5,000.