US Javelin vs Russian Kornet | Which is a better anti-tank system?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 тра 2024
- Video Description: The Russian-Ukraine war appears to be more of a fight between standoff anti-tank missiles rather than tank-on-tank battles. Anti-tank missiles are getting increasingly effective. You've probably heard about thousands of anti-tank missiles that the West has sent to Ukrainian military. The Javelin missile, which has proven to be extremely efficient against Russian tanks, is the best amongst these systems. However, the Russians have anti-tank missiles which they claimed are superior to those used by the US. The Kornet is the best anti-tank weapon on the battlefield according to them. So which is better between the US Javelin missile and the Russian Kornet anti-tank system?
The FGM-148 Javelin is a man-portable fire-and-forget anti-tank missile manufactured in the United States by Texas Instruments which is now Raytheon missiles systems and Martin Marietta which is now Lockheed Martin Javelin is a fire-and-forget missile with autonomous self-guidance and lock-on before launch. While The Russian Kornet anti-tank guided weapon was designed and manufactured by KBP Instrument Design Bureau and Degtyarev plant. It is meant to demolish fortifications, entrenched infantry, and small-scale targets, including tanks equipped with explosive reactive armour.. The FGM-148 Javelin entered service since 1996. It was used in many conflicts around the world of which it is now currently use in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. While the kornet was introduced into service with the Russian army in 1998. It was first used in combat in 2003 and has since has also been used in many conflicts.
------------
Credits:
www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/...
www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/... by Mr Army
www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/... by Alex Kontz
------------
FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER * Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use. The Buzz does not own the rights to these videos and pictures. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images removed, please contact us by email at-thebuzz938@gmail.com. - Розваги
Javelin can be carried and fired by one person. Kornet requires a heavy tripod mount requiring at least 2 people to carry it anywhere. Javelin has better target acquisition system making it more successful as well. No comparison Javelin wins hands down.
also Kornets are usually multiple mounted on a vehicle. Javelins take out vehicles....thus one javelin destroys many Kornets. Javelin FTW!
Javelin flavour of the month? 🤦♂️Well reality is Kornet has a much longer range in such a duel, as simple as that, it can destroy javelin without javelin not being able to do much about it, stop bs'ing yourselves, kornet wins over javelin no matter what technical crap on the sidelines you bring out of the hat, longer range wins at the end no matter what. The guy with kornet can reload as many times as he wants to too. Javelin stops short against it. Kornet wins 👍, Javelin out 👎🏼
@@tamanako2507 hate to break it to you sonny, but kornet wasnt designed as an anti personnel system to fire at a single person and needs someone to actively target a vehicle or building, AND kornet are usually mounted on a vehicle which is the Javelins preferred target in top attack mode...and it follows the target if moving, kornet doesnt, so it isnt about how far a missile can travel it is about being able to target and track a moving target and hit it..so Javelin wins by a country mile. You cant reload a kornet once its blown up. Javelin wins every time. Nice try troll, back to your basement. Kornet is junk, that is why every country in the world is begging for javelin and not asking for krumpets....LOL
AND,,,most vehicle mounted guided anti tank missile NATO makes have greater distance than the Kornet, so according to your logic kornet loses AGAIN. BAHAHA!
@@tamanako2507 Dunce
Kornet also damaged numerous leopard 2 MBTS of Turkey in Syria
Kornets decimated battalions of Merkavas in the 2006 Israel-Hezbollah War...
Not just damaged, but destroyed as well.
Kornet did very well against Israeli Merkava tanks in 2006. Hezbollah took out a lot of Israeli tanks during the war.
@KRIZAR Wikipedia says 20+ tanks. And Wikipedia is in Israel’s favour 😉. Wikipedia also states it was 30k Israelis against 1k Hezbollah fighters 🤪. IDF are only effective against Palestinian civilians. Trash army
Yes how many merkava destroyed
@@jhokierhd 70 to 100
@@jhokierhd u should watch news,i think u r out of this earth....
@@MS-pe7jx 4
The proper comparison is Stugna-P vs Kornet, they are comperable in that they are tripod mounted and laser guided requiring the operator to paint the target durring flight, while Javelin is a fire and forget shoulder fired weapon. That's a radically different system so your comparing apples to oranges, most differences will be from the nature of the system, not it's quality.
Kornet M is a fire and forget system as well.
@lol shit Stugna feels like a copy / mod of Kornet. Similar to Polish Grom beeing a copy / mod of Igla 2. But Polish Piorun is already so far beyond Igla 2 that its like saying NLAW is from Panzerfaust - distant relative.
@@tomk3732 oh lol. do you know something about stugna?)))
It's about the best portably anti-tank weapons of the Russians and the Americans, which are those they talk about here, I guess (I really don't know for sure). Russia has nothing like the Javelin
Cornet missiles are guided by infrared instead of laser.
Kornet seems more akin to the US TOW system, not the man portable Javelin
Totally incomparable missiles. The Kornet is a TOW analog, it's not a shoulder fired/mobile weapon.
Even the TOW is inferior to the Kornet. I think the Hellfire missiles are more comparable to Kornet.
@@medved4030 keep in mind that kornet can be deployed in a minute
@@progoku196 True
@@medved4030 Again, totally incomparable missiles.
analog?🤡🤡
Comparing these two is like comparing a Barrett .50 to a Mosin. Different rolls, similar use, different tactics.
I wouldn’t like to be at the receiving end of neither one.
that is an too extreme example you are bringing up /
more like comparing a Barrett .50 to a Soviet PTRS-41 anti material rifle
kornet proved itself when it took out abrams and malkava israeli tanks during the lebanon 2006 war
@@briant5685 PTRS-41 was used by pro russian troops in Donbas, so that? Kornet and Javelin is a different generation of antitank weapon.
Ohh really?🤣🤣
They are not same. You must compare KORNET and TOW
Yep
For what we need top attack mode if you can destroy a tank like leopard or Abraham or merkava from 8 km win 1/4 the cost of javline
Isn't the TOW wire guided.
@@homerj806 yep , but javelin is not laser guided neither.
This!
Kornet is a very formidable and dangerous AT missile, but more analogous to the US TOW missile system.
The real answer is "Both". Both are very good systems that are the better system depending on the circumstances.
However, the comparison is not really a good one because the Javelin is not intended to fulfill the role of a Kornet type system but is in fact a weapon intended to fit in a role in between a traditional man portable AT system and a crewed ATGM system, giving you many of the advantages of both systems.
And it's not even fair to say the Javelin is the "best" ATGM that has been sent to Ukraine, as each of these systems has a slightly different intended tactical purpose. The Javelin gives you a man portable stand-off fire and forget AT weapon. But as a stand off weapon with a complicated 3D flight path, it's not really much use in close quarters fighting. In street fighting you'd probably be better off with the short range German Panzershrek III. And at medium ranges, the British NLAW works like a more compact and portable Javelin system. And if you are attacking low value targets like trucks, then the Russian RPG-7 or the Swedish Carl Gustaf might be a better choice.
Tactics are a combination of weapons and terrain. What weapon is best often depends on the situation.
BEST ANSWER , thanks
Merkava 4 touted to be the world best MBT, and was trashed when it encountered kornet in lebanon.✌️
One thing is strategy. In early Ukraine war javelins, nlaw and panzerfier were able to hit Russian tanks. But later, they are not. Russian tanks simply remain out of range while tank rounds can still hit them. And kornet-E mounted on armoured vehicles and tripod mounted still destroy Ukraine tanks and armoured vehicles due to its range. But jungle fight is different than desert or open fight. Trees reduce the effectiveness of these weapons. Overall both good with their pros and cons
Nice to explain to these stupid people cause here everyone knows about javelin from video games. Video games experts.
Also most Javelins miss, bounce off, because the warhead isn't working as it should (old, bad maintained crap) or not able to penetrate the tank. Overall the success rate of them is very low.
Kornet is a larger heavier system designed for defense - it is far more useful for say Ukraine then Javelin. Here is why:
Kornet can be placed in a house, sticking through a small hole in the wall while operator is in the basement of another house, nice and safe, well away from the action & no heat signature. Operator can be comfy in a chair, can easily switch etc.
You cannot do any of these things with a Javelin.
Next, you cannot easily use Javelin in top attack mode in a city and it even has issues in a forest.
Javelin cannot be easily used in direct mode as the warhead is pointed down at 30 degrees and is about 1/3 smaller then that of Kornet. So maybe only rear hit would penetrate - even side hits are probably only damage hits.
Korent can be used for ambushes more easily. You can attack from 2x the distance so return fire would be difficult. You can also be safely away from the firing position, just lock in enemy tank, fire and forget - from long way off.
Main issue with Javelin is also its heat seeking tracker - it can hit on the 1/2 of the turret that is not above soldiers heads - so at least 50% of hits on the turret are only minor damage. It can also hit engine bay - a mobility kill not more.
Secondary issue is 1 trick pony with the top attack only mode. Against anything other then trucks or maybe enemy bunkers you cannot do direct attack. It has to be top attack. City fighting becomes difficult or impossible. You cannot fire from cover. Even if you fire without cover you may hit buildings etc.
Ukraine has its own anti-tank system, called "stugna" or "skif", which is similar to a cornet
Javelin = Dodge Viper
Kornet = Lada Riva
Stuhna=Skoda Octavia
Javelin has been battle proven which would help its sales
For Cost of One Javelin you can 25 of them only thing is Kornet is a portable one
So is kornet
@@ChandranPrema123 Who told you that the price is that. At this point if I tell you that the Russian crap costs 1 million dollars my words has the same exact worth as the Russian word
@@ChandranPrema123 • The Kornet requires a two-man crew with a bypod while the javelin is actually portable and only needs a single operator to fire so rewatch the vid...
Kornet has been destroy numerous brand new Saudi Arabia M1 Abrams tanks in Yemen and Kornets used were some old Iranian Kornets they bought in 90s
Lebanon war 2006 many Israeli Merkava tank destroyed and disabled by Kornets.
Javeline hits the tank.. tank begin to burn, the russians get out of tank… then tank explodes…… Kornet hits the tank… everyone are dead..tank is destroyed !
Kornet is the best ATGM....👍👍👍
If your inside the range of the Javelin the Javelin is better and if your outside the Javelin range than the Kornett is better so the military need to choose there position to favor there weapon and avoid the ennemy weapon range.
Kornet-em 10 km, fire and forget-yes, top atack-yes 1000-1300 mm. Jawelin 2,5 km , fire anf forgeith -yes, top atack-yes, 900mm. Prices? Kornet -em much better.
its not fire and forget stupid the operators have to sit with their thumbs in their mouths while painting the laser guided munition to the target.
@@kyleshirley80 Yess.
Oh lol. Top attack by laser-guided rocket?)) 10 km and fire and forget without any proofs. Weight - Kornet em - few tones, Javelin - 22 kg. And the main thing Kornet EM doesn’t exists in real life
Kornet in fireable configuration needs a tripod and is twice as heavy as the Javelin. It's not really the correct comparison. Closer to a Metis.
We see in Ukraine, that Kornet is the better system. Because it has more range and significant better accuracy. 85% of Javelin shot dont hit their target in real condition. And only 40% destroy their traget. It has problems hits targets, where the engine is on the other side. Kornet has around 75% accuracy and dont care about how the target stay.
90%+ of hits destroy their target. But the advantege of Javelin is that is lighter and can be carried by one man
The Ukraine army are using both anti-tank systems so what's your point..?
javelin's accuracy is 0.3. kornet's is 0.8.
Ma'am..
Kbi world anti Sat weapons pr video bny..
By time you read the IKEA like instructions and mount that thing, you'll be dead. Javelin all the way. 🇺🇸 💪
Haha true. Javelin>T90, T14, T72 and all the other T’s before them
@@tylerclayton6081 Kornets>Abrahams, leopard etc.
@@randomdude6441 no kornet cant destroy a panzer III lmao
@@randomdude6441 Maybe against Abrahams but against Abrams they are unproven
@@pjdu5yifutd 😂😂😂don't underestimate your enemy
Ma'am kbi taiwan weapons pr video bny jo China ke against useful ho
You didn’t comment on battery life of Javelin, 30min!
In any complicated weapons system there are components and operations that make it better in some ways then it's competition and worse in others. For instance the javelin is extremely portable requiring time to get out of the way once you fire it the cornet is based on a tripod making it more difficult to use. Training doctrine and availability are also important components that can outweigh any individual superiority or deficiency, if any of the above are not implemented well.
kornet having the tripod is not much of a disadvantage since javelin requires 2 people to carry the system.
Javelin' range is 2.5km, Kornet' 5.5km and Kornet is far more destructive.
Gotta love the bias tho 😂
Not really comparable to each other imo. A closer comparison would be Kornets vs TOWs, ad both are tripod mounted optically tracked missile emplacements that can also be mounted on vehicles. Currently the Russian military doesn't have a man portable fire and forget top attack capable ATGM that's analogous to the Javelin and other similar systems.
Destructivity over Tech
Economic over Expensive
Manual over Automatic
Reliability over Complexity
Multi-Usage over Specific-Usage
Apples compared to Oranges?
Kornet's price is only 1/3 of Javelin's which is important. The Russians do everything cheaply and with the same or superior features with only 1/3 of the budget. Javelin is too expensive and difficult to reach customers :D . with Javelin Just missed and you lost $80,000. Originally during the war in Ukraine, Javelin was heavily used and now we no longer see Javelin on the battlefield.
I like how there're stupids that compared Kornet to Javelin and then call Javelin a "superior design"
It is a superior design.
Cornet is laser guided,javelin is infrared guided.
Yes and that's why I think kornet is better since it can't be jammed until there is apoor visibility but in 2020 Indian forces destroyed Pak bunker in winter with poor visibility
And the javlin is also too good it's ir seeker can't be jammed until there is a dedicated electronic warfare vehicle
Actually that is what the shtora system was invented for,the Chinese have an anti laser system that uses another laser to blind the operator,the us uses the black raven soft kill aps on tanks,Bradleys and planes and helicopters which were their original purpose.
The javelin compensates for the inferior performance of the missile by hitting from above, which brings everything into question.
It can also be used by one person. The Chinese are also developing theirs. The javelin is better.
The Kornets missile explodes above the turret as well blowing it off in pieces.The Abrams tank is not going to survive a hit from the Kornet.
You can aim like you want in Kornet and hit him from above
The latest version of Kornet has top-down attack mode similar to Javelin.
It,s definitely gona be bought more now that it has been proven it,s pretty good against standart tanks
Cornet: Missile 8.2 kg, warhead 7 kg? Must be something wrong. Perhaps it is mass of missile without warhead.
Why are all the specifications given in metric except for the range, which is in miles?
Javelin costs are steep per shot is 200k.. Kornet is cheap 20k and a tank killer. both US dollar amounts.. there is also a super abundent amount of Kornet missles, and take a fraction of the time to build, compared to the far mor expensive and complex Javelin.
Because Kornet is nowhere near as good against modern tanks. They will get spotted easily by the APS on NATO tanks.
With much newer NLAWs for example, which are also quite cheap and popped a LOT of T-72/T-90s. There is nothing the Russian tanks can do to stop it, it's self guided after launch.
@@BlatentlyFakeName Didn't you see how easily Kornet destroyed tanks like Leopard 2A6 and Challenger 2?
moving tanks or ones already mobility killed?@@user-kn2em3iy6d
Javelin advantage - top attack mode, fire and forget mechanism due to inbuilt guidance on the launcher.
Kornet advantage - range, cost and penetration.
Javelin is great for flanking in close range combat within built up areas, Kornet is better at sniping armored columns from standoff range and can be fielded in higher numbers at different vantage points. For every Javelin , three Kornet can be fielded.
Both are lethal in ambush and in defensive operations.
Javelins will help Ukraine so long their fight remains defensive - the moment it turns offensive, Kornets are going to wreak havoc on Ukrainian mechanized units .
Russian Kornet just sounds better than Javelin.
Did you conveniently forget hundreds of M1Abrams lost in Yemen? UA-cam is full of Abrams lost videos from Yemen. Kornet is ancient but it definitely has a bigger bite.
22 Abrams destroyed in Yemen not hundreds through poor deployment. The Saudi tanks don't have the armor the us have,the era or the black raven soft kill aps and not all us abrams are equipped with the era or aps even though they should be.
@@jeffreyprezalar220 I was quoting from 2016 news articles. BTW there are more than 22 videos of Abrams being blown up in Yemen.
Those weren't Abrams...
The advantage of the javelin being able to attack a tank from its upper side, is that the armor is considered thin at the top compared to the rest of the tank body, but at the same time the kornet can penetrate deeper and according to what I know there is no tank that has an armor that can deal with 1200 mm of penetration from all sides
The biggest advantage the javelin has is that they use it against Russian Tanks which synergistically produce that kabooom effect. Surely it could take out any tank, but that post-hit-fanfare from a Russian T72 is a sight to be seen. Honestly, one has to be clinically insane to design a tank like this, it's a tracked coffin.
The Ukraine soldiers who have used Javelin are the most capable answering this question.
kornet proved itself when it took out abrams and malkava israeli tanks during the lebanon 2006 war
@@briant5685 but there are no abrams or merkava tanks in ukraine only t-72s, t-80s and t-90s getting blown up by Javelin EVERYDAY!
@Kotomine Berndrewd then besides the T-72s getting destroyed by Javelins they will also get destroyed by Abrams. Not much of a competition. You lose.
@Kotomine Berndrewd clown in your dreams...all I see is new videos everyday of another 5 T-72s and T-80s with their turrets popped off and burning! Courtesy of Javelins, NLAWS Artillery, Mortars, or a dozen other Man portable anti tank missile or rocket....Javelin for the win still!
@Kotomine Berndrewd I dont own them, I live in Canada. Why are you so scared of Javelin? Besides the fact they are destroying hundreds of tanks already in Ukraine? bring the T-90 and T-14s out...Javelin wants to dominate YOU TOO!☠💩🤡👺🤣🤣🤣
russian does not have a counterpart for javelin..kornet should be compared to TOW i guess
They captured many trophy Javelins from running Ukrainians.... maybe in cooperation with China they can copy it. And we all know everything China copy is much cheaper.
RPG 29
29.2 kg is not an Kornet total weight with launcher, it’s only rocket weight. Launcher itself has same weight. So total Kornet weight with launcher more than 55 kg
This comparison isn't really great, you should compare Javelin with NLAW system
Kornet kills Abram's and leopards, thats all you need to know.
Isn’t a Kornet for icecream
It turn tanks into liquid cream
Stefan Markovski lol
Cadillac Escalade Vs Lada Kalina
😂🤣😁😄😅
Lada kills better at longer and safety range. The tanks are toast !
Корнет стоит очень дёшево, джавилин одна ракета 178000 долларов, корнет пробивает 1300 мм брони за динамической защитой, джавилин 600 мм, корнет бьёт на 5 км джавилин на 2 км. Корнет лучше.
I agree, Javelin is the best.
@@markosd7950 джавилин какашка, корнэт в 1000 раз лучше.
@@markosd7950 корнет д дальность 10 км. Джавилин не может поражать ДОТы и не заведённые танки.
@@gosha5172 I agree with you. It is so nice to see how Javelin blows these russian tank turrets up to the sky like little birds.
@@markosd7950 хахаха т 72 б3м выдержал 4 попадания джавелина, а нам приятно смотреть как в Ираке РПГ7 уничтожает Абрамс.
Kornet is doing very well against the Challenger 2’s🔥
one that was detracked and stationary?
Even by just comparing cost per missile, Kornet doesn't win by an inch but by a mile. It outperforms Javelin in many aspects particularly range. Unless US diplomatic arm twisting is done, which it often does, one would be a nut job to buy a single missile of worth 80000 USD than buying 4 in the same amount of comparable performance.
за ценник первого, можно сделать 4 вторых
Not a problem for the U.S though. Which is kinda crazy, would imagine they are very interested in NLAW as well.
Viermal russischer Schrott bringt auch nichts
How many Vankas with РКГ grenade you can make instead of Kornet?))
I've never heard of the Korn
The Javelin is designed to destroy tanks, while the Kornet is a multi-purpose missile: Not the same!
Russia has top attack atgm's that are tank destroyers too bud! sorry to burst your drooling over American/western military weapons
@@ethanmac639 If those systems are single man portable then that is what should have been compared here instead.
@@kebertxela941 agreed
@@kebertxela941 Russia definitely lags behind atgm quality and innovation right now!
Javelin can also take down helicopters.
Next video:
°
Cornet range from 100 to 5.500 meters.
Armour penetration Up to 1.200mm.
Ja, scheint nur in der Ukraine Scheiße zu funktionieren. Oder die russischen Soldaten sind zu blöd oder zu besoffen...
At a cost of 3:1 for the Kornet, longer range and deeper penetration, i'd take the Kornet over the Javelin every-time ---- I can afford to hit the same tank 3 times from a safer distance, for the same cost of a single Javelin.....
Regardless of whether the two can be compared i just watched a video of the kornet vs Abrams tank.The guy who did the research says Kornet is more effective.Distance 8 km vs Javelin at 1.5 km and when the missile explodes it is above the turret.The turret goes flying and has a much deeper penetration.Therefore it is the best for self protection and blowing up tanks.Abrams blow up big time guaranteed.Stop bullshitting please.Thank you.
Stupidity of tank driver is the best anti-tank system
El TOW es filoguiado, similar al metis
El kornet es guiado por laser
FJM-148 is a superior design. It's top down attack and infrared homing system is far more effective.
Why are you comparing a tow system to a man portable system???
Javelin have more battle expierience and 90% effective on Early Russian tanks like T80,T72,T64,T62,T54/55
But its will strugle destroying Tanks like T90 and T14 which consist of Double plated explosive reactive armor.
Kornet has only been use in testing but if the N.A.T.O. deploy tanks like Abrams,Leo 2a7,Challenger 3,Leclerc
It would perform just like the javelin and would be known as Leopard killer that would help more sales as if its more cheaper than javelin.
Javelin never fought against T-64 T-62 T-55/54
And ur forgetting merkava
T-90 was already destroyed by javelin in Ukraine.
T-14 is not an real tank, it is just russian fairytale
Actually, the javelins are proving less effective in Ukraine nowadays. Small battery, jamming, Ukrainians are selling them off instead.
T14 cant even get to the front line.
do you belives eveything Moscosw tells you?@@francismusali676
Some guy once said "The beginning of every war is like opening the door into a dark room. One never knows what is hidden in the darkness" these are just instruments, they make no logic that you have an overpriced guitar and you play lousy music.
Kornet by body slam!
la práctica ha demostrado q los misiles antitanque de segunda generación son más confiables y eficaces q los de tercera generación q son más costosos y no dan resultados solo son infladas sus maravillas
The proper comparison is TOW-2A vs Kornet. How can you compare a F&F man portable launcher vs a crew served wire guided SACLOS static launched system.
That's like comparing.. "whats better, M982 EXCALIBUR vs OG-7VL 40mm rpg launched frag grenade
I suppose you didn't mention the cost differences. You can equip 20x more soldiers wtih the Kornet at the same cost; so which do you want then? 1 guy about to take out 1 tank or 20 guys able to possibly take out 20 but likely to take out at least 10. Duh.
Let's see how many people I can piss off....If a $15 million tank is setting there smoking right beside of the supply vehicles because of a $40k rocket. Or even still a $3k artillery round guided by a $20k drone. Armor is over in the application that we know. 70 tons of vehicle, 100 tons of supply, over 10 people, (maint, fuel, and crew), maybe 500 miles of travel without maintenance, only to be effectively countered by 2 guys and $40k...... Things are always changing, I just hope entitlement and corruption doesn't prevent us from putting budgets where they need to go.
This has already been disproven, but go off
@@power3480 It's being proven right now. The British proved it in Africa almost 80 years ago. What happened to Rommel's tanks, with little truck mounted fast moving, logistically sound guns? Those we're vehicle bound.
Charge of the Light Brigade, not the first, and not the last time outmoded equipment will see the troops paying the price.
The issue is just as much about bad Russian tactics as it is about their bad tanks. The Russians are not using combined arms attacks, which entails coordinating your artillery, infantry and armor into a coherent assault package. They don't fire artillery barrages to get the ambushers to put their heads down, and don't dismount their infantry to sweep into the towns behind the artillery barrages. Instead, the send armor columns onto narrow roads in forested areas and into urban areas. They might as well be painting bullseyes on themselves. And whenever they are ambushed they run off. Having served in the military, I can tell the Russian soldiers are poorly trained and led by donkeys.
@@nicholasconder4703 Oh......I get it now....you realize you just said why?
Why you don't speak about the 32 merkav that destroyed by kornet and the hundreds of Saudi's m1a2 tanks destroyed by Houthis
this is how propaganda works
@@lek8630 source:pls trust me
@@lek8630 merkava tanks have been destroyed by Kornet is factual
@@lek8630 their is a lot of video about this
@@berkaneanis3912 ofc, israeli dont have as much money as americans and as much tank building experience as russians so merkava tanks heavily overhyped
Many of you comments here probably never heard before the Russian version. It proved itself throughout Syria, Iraq, Mali etc. No need for unreliable UA-cam opinion for the sake of subscribers.
Imposible comparation... Kornet and for exemp. TOW.
As a Ukranian i can say that javelin is on a another level, kornet would be in use in the WW2 but today its junk.
I'm American. We need to send your country M1A2-sep3 Abrahms Tanks And F-15 Jets NOW.
@@juliodyarzagaray Thank you people of America for your help🇺🇸🤝🇺🇦❤
Junk* lol
This is why Ukraine copied Kornet and call it Stugna P
LOl ..they how Saudis lost Abrams M1 tanks at such high rate in Yemen that only few actualy menage to return ..and that was with Iranian copy
Lol, where did the information about the "efficiency" of javelins come from? I have not found a single confirmed case of the destruction of a tank by a javelin filmed on video))) Only fakes and commercials?!))) On the Internet you can find effective shots of Stugna, Tou, Cornet, Nlow, RPG, but not 1 video with a javelin? ))))))
Both the Iranian Dehlavieh and Toophan 5 is also better than US Javlin anti-tank system
Kornet-EM has twice the distance and twice the magnification of a Javelin. You do the math. For the poor Ukrainians the math has already been done.
Kornet is not a fire and forget missile. They have to hold the laser on the target to hit the target. That means the launcher and crew are toast.
Sure it is. You designate a target and computer tracks it from now on.
NOt true
Not really considering u can fire from long range
I'd rather have a point and forget system. That would give me better time to jump in a foxhole if necessary for what may be coming my way than not. ... in this world of instantaneous computerized defense systems.
Ukraine army should give the effectiveness of javelins. They are ones who used it the most. Since it's fire and forget, we can rule out the factor of skill soldier. We can get absolute true data here assuming they are honest with their data
Kornet in my Oppinion.
Javelin vs hj12 & type 1 lmat & at1k raybolt mpatgm
The Javelin is now a headache for Russian tanks..
Let the Ukrainian army first learn how to use it, otherwise the morons will not be able to hit a Soviet T-72 tank with your Javelins...)
And your personal wet dream: by this day, DNR and LNR militia already picked up 3000 Javelins, which they now using against Ukrainians. Stop living in the world of fantasies, you dork: what's good is a weapon, if you don't have the guts to fire it? Those lousy ukrainian nationalists sure runs fast as they can from the russians, dropping everything they have, including ATGM's. And if you think, that i'm lying - well, that's because your own government doesn't allow you to see the truth.
Iranian-made tank hunter is the best.
Javelin all day long.
Το Javelin απέτυχε στην Ουκρανία η απόδοσης του ήταν μικρότερες από αυτά στα χαρακτηριστικά του....
The kornet cheeper and same effect
Kornet >Challenger 2
Kornet > Leopard 2
Kornet > merkava 4
Kornet > abrams m1a2
Kornet 20k dollars
Kornet wins
Haha. Let alone kornet, just rpg took out a dozen of Turkish leopard tanks
you have to be a superhuman to hit a moving tank with an rpg. lets admit it.
The stats are all wrong
Unit cost of javelin is 126000£
Kornet is the best anti tank system at the world !
Not even close...
best atgm: 9M123M
Javelin>T90, T14, T72 and all the other T’s before them
kornet proved itself when it took out abrams and malkava israeli tanks during the lebanon 2006 war
@@briant5685 but there are no abrams or merkava tanks in ukraine only t-72s, t-80s and t-90s getting blown up by Javelin EVERYDAY!
@@jtf2dan but abrams are 'invincible' aren't they..??
@@briant5685 You mean like t-14 Armata that wont go to Ukraine? BAHAHA! Javelin for the WIN!
@@jtf2dan please give Ukraine some abrams pretty please, you will be embarrassed with your so called invincible tank
Ok lemme guess; Javelin is better. It will just come down to the price, the Javelin is way more costly
it's worse in every respect.
How to say it politely. Russian propaganda featured much about their power, but the real war showed how far reality is from propaganda. So I think the same about this comparison. Kornet is only propaganda, while Javelin is reality.
Ask this US army veteran in Afghnistan and Iraq what Kornet mean.😏😏😏 They had to counter the kornet launcher with Ah-64 gunship.
What happening in Ukrain is that the russian govt just pushed them into the Ukrain without any precautions. You may have seen those captured russian soldiers interview, how much they morally down. Even if Ukrainan army use Kornet it would have created more destruction then javelin. But they using javelin just because they are out of ammo.
Remember what happened in vietnam ahahha
Lol ..see all that brand new Abrams M1 tanks off Saudi Arabia that finished life in Yemen ...becase that your one sided propaganda in US does not show does not mean its not happen..in US they only show selective news..what they like..what news they dont like they just ignore ...Your Abrams were slotered by poor Yemen and Kornets 25 years old
@@ritabratagoswami7724 Really. Kornets are kinda recent and I don't think Ukraine has much or any.
There is no debate. Javelin’s are better than Russia’s best tanks. Did you not see the Russians lose the battle of Kyiv and run away
What you see is what Western media is showing you. Russia did not even use T-14 Armata tanks and sure many a Russian tanks are destroyed. Also, Ukraine is a pile of rubble now.
Yeah because Russia did not use their top end, Heavy armored tanks, they used cheap models
They are both good both have pro and con. The Kornet are cheaper and easier to produce. The javelin on the other hand is expensive and can only shot one time. Maybe when NATO get involved will see modern tank like the Abrams get smash by the corner.
Now we know Javelin can target Kornet... so Javelin wins.
javelin won't be able to target infantry with kornet whereas kornet can target anything including buildings. also kornet has a greater effective range and velocity. kornet can use a thermobaric charge that makes sure anyone carrying javelin is a walking dead.
Javelin, even a modern tank has never seen how Kornet has already broken Challenger2, Merkava and even the modernized Leopard2 of Sweden (strv122)
Javelin has made swiss cheese out of Russian tanks in Ukraine. As far as targeting capability somehow I highly doubt a Russian system beats Javelin's.
Ukraine doesn't have air force/air defence....so russian drone can guide this Kornet rocket.
@@mishkosimonovski23 150 russian planes and 140 helicopters don't think so
Not only is Russian tanks & planes Swiss cheese, the Red army is as well...
@@VolodyaUaPl LOL..its 16 planes and 14 helicopters..there is comlete list that is udpdated daily ...Ukraine lost 30 planes...but i would still say Ukraine victoru becase Russian fail to neutralise Ukrain air deffence
kornet proved itself when it took out abrams and malkava israeli tanks during the lebanon 2006 war
kornet launches 2 missiles in succession guided by the same laser beam. that way it penetrates any armor. it's not subject to any interference, javelin fails to aim successfully if the target uses smoke or aerosol. kornet's effective range is higher and the velocity of the projectile is higher. it can also be used against fortifications especially if equipped with a thermobaric charge.
Javeling does a top attack which is superior to all 'normal' frontal attacks, because the armor in top is way way thinner. A javeling has 2 detonations, 1st to block countermeasures and 2nd to penetrate. But, you believe your Russian propaganda and I will stick to mu Western propaganda and we will both be played against each other while I personally don't carry a grudge towards you, maybe you even have add like me and we can talk on another level
@@aighti javelin's accuracy is 0.3 whereas kornet's accuracy is 0.8. every other kornet's spec is higher than that of javelin.